WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Skid control system    
United States Patent3966267   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/3966267.html
Inventor(s)McNinch, Jr.; Joseph H. (Oak Park, MI); Urban; John A. (Livonia, MI); Hopkins; Gary L. (Southfield, MI)
AbstractA skid control system is provided for use with a vehicle having a pair of spaced apart wheels and having a braking system for applying braking forces to the wheels. A brake control circuit responds to a skid signal obtained from any one of a plurality of incipient detector circuits to act upon the braking system to release the braking forces. A delayed skid signal is provided whenever the difference in wheel speeds of the two wheels exceeds a given amount. A delayed skid signal is also provided if the average wheel speed of the two wheels decreases at a rate greater than a desired decreasing rate. If both wheels decelerate, a skid signal is provided upon sensing that the faster wheel is decelerating at a rate greater than a reference rate. As the wheels spin-up toward an ideal velocity for a braked vehicle, an acceleration detector serves to insure wheel roll up on low friction surfaces. If the wheels spin up at an acceleration greater than an acceleration level, the acceleration detector output is inhibited. If the acceleration is less than the preceding level and more than a second level, a skid signal is provided. Also, as the wheels spin-up to a desired velocity, braking forces are restored when the rate of acceleration declines below the second acceleration level. Monitoring circuits are provided for monitoring various operations of the skid control system and deactivate same when the operation is not within prescribed limits.
   














 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History
Drawing from US Patent 3966267
Skid control system - US Patent 3966267 Drawing
Skid control system
Inventor     McNinch, Jr.; Joseph H. (Oak Park, MI); Urban; John A. (Livonia, MI); Hopkins; Gary L. (Southfield, MI)
Owner/Assignee     Eaton Corporation (Cleveland, OH)
Patent assignment
All assignments
Publication Date     June 29, 1976
Application Number     05/528,218
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     November 29, 1974
US Classification     303/149 303/122.06 303/159
Int'l Classification     B60T 008/02
Examiner     Kunin; Stephen G.
Assistant Examiner    
Attorney/Law Firm     Teagno & Toddy
Address
Parent Case     This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 326,676, filed Jan. 26, 1973, now abandoned.
Priority Data    
USPTO Field of Search     188/181 303/20 303/21 307/10 R 317/5 324/161 324/162 340/53 340/62
Patent Tags     skid control
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
3545817



[0 after 0 votes]
3556610



[0 after 0 votes]
3751117



[0 after 0 votes]
3768872



[0 after 0 votes]
3863993



[0 after 0 votes]
3650575
Okamoto
303/156
Mar,1972

[0 after 0 votes]
3586385
Florus
425/556
Jun,1971

[0 after 0 votes]
3578819
Atkins
568/422
May,1971

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


What is claimed is:

1. A skid control system for use with a vehicle having at least first and second spaced apart independently rotatable wheels and having a braking system for applying braking forces to said wheels and comprising:

brake control means responsive to a skid signal for controlling said braking system to release the braking forces on said wheels;

means for providing first and second wheel speed signals of magnitudes respectively representative of the wheel speeds of said first and second wheels;

logic circuit means for providing a skid signal when the acceleration rate of the faster of said wheels exceeds a predetermined positive acceleration; and

means for inhibiting said logic circuit means from providing said skid signal when the positive acceleration rate of the faster wheel attains a level representative of a second predetermined acceleration greater and more positive than that of said first predetermined acceleration.

2. A skid control system as set forth in claim 1 and wherein said means for inhibiting includes circuit means for varying said second predetermined acceleration rate in dependence upon the speed of the faster wheel.

3. A brake control system for a vehicle having at least first and second independently rotatable spaced apart wheels and having a braking system for applying braking forces to said wheels and comprising:

brake control means responsive to a skid signal for controlling said braking system to release the braking forces on said wheels;

means for providing first and second wheel speed signals having magnitudes respectively representative of the wheel speed of said first and second wheels;

logic circuit means for providing a skid signal when the wheel speed signal for one of said wheels differs from that of the other said wheel by a predetermined amount;

means for delaying application of said skid control signal to said brake control means to permit additional braking force to be applied for a limited time to said wheels so that the faster rotating wheel may have additional braking effect for slowing the vehicle; and

means for varying said delay period in dependence upon the speed of the faster rotating wheel.

4. A skid control system for use with a vehicle having at least first and second spaced apart independently rotatable wheels and having a braking system for applying braking forces to said wheels and comprising:

brake control means responsive to an applied skid signal for controlling said braking system to relieve the braking forces on said wheels;

means for providing first and second wheel speed signals having magnitudes respectively representative of the wheel speeds of said first and second wheels;

means for providing from said first and second speed signals an average wheel speed signal having a magnitude respectively representative of the average speed of said first and second wheels;

first means for comparing said average wheel speed signal with a reference signal and providing a skid signal whenever the magnitude of the average signal is less than that of said reference signal;

reference signal means for providing a reference signal which continuously decreases in magnitude as the speed of the faster wheel decreases and from an initial value representative of the speed of the faster wheel just prior to the time the faster wheel decreased in speed and at a decay rate initially representative of a first deceleration rate;

said reference signal means including circuit means responsive to said skid signal to vary the decay rate of said reference signal from said first rate to a second rate representative of a slower rate of deceleration so that said reference signal continuously further decreases in magnitude as the speed of the faster wheel decreases;

time delay means connected to the output circuit of said comparing means for delaying application of said skid signal to said brake control means; and

means for adjusting said time delay in dependence upon the wheel speed of the faster wheel.

5. A skid control system for use with a vehicle having at least first and second spaced apart independently rotatable wheels and a braking system for applying braking forces to said wheels and comprising:

braking control means responsive to a skid signal for controlling said braking system to release the braking forces on said wheels;

means for providing first and second wheel speed signals having magnitudes respectively representative of the wheel speeds of said first and second wheels;

logic circuit means for providing said skid signal when said wheel speed signal are decreasing in magnitude such that the average magnitude of said wheel speed signals is less than that of a predetermined reference;

time delay means for delaying the time of applying said skid signal to said brake control means for a limited time duration so that the faster of said wheels may be braked for an additional period of time to slow the vehicle before the brake forces are released in response to the skid signal; and

means for varying said time delay in dependence upon the speed of the faster wheel.

6. A skid control system for use with a vehicle having at least first and second spaced apart independently rotatable wheels and having a braking system for applying braking forces to said wheels and comprising:

brake control means responsive to an applied skid signal for controlling said braking system to relieve the braking forces on said wheels;

means for providing first and second wheel speed signals having magnitudes respectively representative of the wheel speeds of said first and second wheels;

means for providing from said first and second speed signals an average wheel speed signal having a magnitude representative of the average speed of said first and second wheels;

reference signal means for providing a reference signal which continuously decreases in magnitude as the speed of the faster wheel decreases and from an initial value representative of the speed of the faster wheel just prior to the time the faster wheel decreased in speed and at a first decay rate initially representative of a first deceleration rate;

first comparator means for comparing said average wheel speed signal with said reference signal and including means for initiating a skid signal in response to reduction of the magnitude of said average signal to below that of said reference signal while said reference signal was decreasing at said first decay rate;

said reference signal means including circuit means responsive upon initiation of said skid signal to change the decay rate of said reference signal from said first rate to a second rate representative of a slower rate of deceleration so that said reference signal continuously further decreases in magnitude;

said first means for comparing said average wheel speed signal with said reference signal including means for interrupting said skid signal in response to increase of the magnitude of said average signal to above said reference signal while said reference signal was decreasing at said second decay rate.

7. A skid control system as set forth in claim 6 wherein said reference signal means includes energy storage means for storing a signal having a magnitude representative of the magnitude of the speed of the faster wheel and energy discharge circuit means for discharging said energy storage means when the faster wheel speed signal decreases to a value less than the magnitude of the signal stored by said energy storage means, said discharge circuit means having first and second discharge paths to provide a rate of discharge in accordance with said first decay rate and switch means responsive to a said skid signal for deactivating one of said discharge paths so that said energy means discharges at a rate in accordance with said second decay rate.

8. A skid control system as set forth in claim 6 including acceleration detecting means for providing said skid signal when the rate of acceleration of the faster wheel exceeds a first positive acceleration level and is below a second positive acceleration level so that said brake control means and said reference signal means respond to the skid signal first provided by either said first comparing means or by said acceleration detecting means to respectively release said braking forces and vary the decay rate of said reference signal to said second decay rate.

9. A skid control system as set forth in claim 6 and further including second comparator means for comparing the deceleration rate of said faster wheel with a reference deceleration rate for providing a skid signal to said brake control means when the magnitude of the deceleration rate of said faster wheel exceeds the magnitude of said reference deceleration rate;

time delay means connected with the output of said first comparator means, at such a place as to delay application of said skid signal of said first comparator means to said brake control means but not to delay said skid signal of said second comparator means.
 Description Submit all comments and votes
 


This invention relates to the art of skid control systems for controlling braking forces applied to the wheels on a vehicle having a braking system, and, more particularly, to a skid control system for use with a vehicle having a pair of spaced apart wheels.

When a vehicle operator actuates the vehicle's braking system, braking forces are applied to the brake controlled wheels to slow the vehicle. The vehicle is preferably decelerated to a desired lower speed or to a stop condition, without a skid condition taking place. To prevent a skid condition, the vehicle should be decelerated with decreasing wheel speed which is slightly less than that of the vehicle. If, however, the wheel speed decreases at a rate substantially faster than that of the vehicle speed, then this is indicative of an impending wheel lock or skid condition. To prevent the wheel lock, skid control systems serve to sense this impending condition and release the brake forces. When the brake forces are released, the wheels are permitted to spinup toward the vehicle velocity. The braking forces are then restored to continue slowing the vehicle.

As a vehicle is being decelerated, a condition may arise where the wheel speed of one wheel being monitored by the skid control system is substantially different than that of the other wheel. This is normally indicative of a split coefficient of friction between the road surface and each of the two wheels. The slower wheel may be approaching a skid condition. Consequently, when the wheel speed difference becomes too great it is desirable to release the brake forces to prevent wheel lock up of the low speed wheel. However, the faster of the two wheels may still provide effective braking of the vehicle and it is frequently desirable, paticularly in a split coefficient of friction situation, that the braking forces applied to the faster wheel be continued for an added time duration even though the differential wheel speed exceeds the desired limits for differential wheel speed.

If both wheels being monitored by the skid control system are decelerated too fast, then this is indicative of an incipient wheel lock condition. Since the faster wheel produces less braking than the slower wheel, it is desirable to compare the deceleration of the faster wheel with a deceleration reference. If the deceleration of the faster wheel is greater than the reference the brake forces may be released.

Once an incipient skid condition has been sensed and the vehicle brake forces have been released, the vehicle wheels will be permitted to spin-up. It is known that the ideal wheel velocity for slowing a vehicle is below the vehicle's speed. During an incipient skid condition, the wheel velocity decreases substantially below this ideal velocity. Once the brake forces are released by an anti-skid system, the wheels are permitted to spin-up toward the ideal velocity and then the brake forces are permitted to be reapplied. On a dry surface, the coefficient of friction between the vehicle wheels and the surface is relatively high, and it has been determined that a spin-up rate on the order of 5g will quickly bring the wheels up to the ideal velocity and there is no need to keep the brakes off, since the wheels will probably reach the ideal velocity even if the brakes are applied. It is important that the wheel velocity does not overshoot the ideal velocity since this would tend to increase the vehicle stopping distance. Consequently, it is desirable to sense a high spinup rate, such as a 5g rate, and then permit brake reapplication so that the braking forces may take effect as the wheel speed approaches ideal wheel speed.

On low coefficient of friction surfaces, such as ice, the wheel spin-up rate will be between 0.5g and 5.0g which may allow a fixed bleed reference to fall too low to prevent wheel lock up. To correct this condition, it is desirable that the brakes be held off by the acceleration of the wheel, with the limits being 0.5g to 5.0 g. On any surface the wheel acceleration will drop to zero as the wheels reach vehicle speed and with an acceleration logic, the brakes may be applied when the acceleration falls below 0.5g. In addition to the foregoing, it is further desirable that a skid control system be provided with monitoring circuits for monitoring various operating conditions of the skid control system to determine whether the operation is within prescribed limits. Thus, if the skid control system employs a voltage regulating circuit to provide regulated DC voltage to operate the skid detector circuits, erroneous indication of either an incipient skid condition or no skid incipient condition may result if the regulated voltage decreases in magnitude below a limit level. Also, the typical skid control system employs a valve solenoid which, when actuated, serves to act upon the vehicle's brake control system to release braking forces. This valve solenoid should not be energized when no incipient skid condition has been detected and it should be energized when the incipient skid condition has been detected. In addition, if a skid detector circuit provides a skid signal representative of an incipient skid condition for an unduly long time period, this may be indicative of a malfunction in the control system. If any such faulty operating condition takes place, it is desirable that the skid control system be, at least temporarily, deactivated.

It is therefore a primary object of the present invention to provide a skid control system which satisfies the above enumerated needs.

It is a specific object of the present invention to provide a skid control system which, upon noting that the wheel speeds of the two wheels being monitored by the skid control system exceeds a predetermined magnitude, provides a time delayed skid signal so that a slight delay is provided in releasing the brake forces, permitting additional braking forces to be applied to the faster wheel.

It is an additional object of the present invention to provide a skid control system to provide brake release when the average wheel speed of the two wheels being monitored by the skid control system decreases below a declining reference signal representative of a desired rate of decline in the speed of the faster wheel.

It is still further object of the present invention to provide a skid control system which serves to release braking forces applied to a pair of wheels being monitored by the skid control system are decelerating and, more particularly, when the faster of the two wheels decelerates at a rate greater than a reference deceleration.

A still further object of the present invention is to provide monitoring circuits for a skid control system to monitor the operation thereof and deactivate the anti-skid system when the operating characteristics are not within prescribed limits.

The present invention contemplates that the skid control system be used with a vehicle having at least a pair of spaced apart independently rotatable wheels and in which a braking system is provided for applying braking forces to the wheels. It is also contemplated that a brake control means be provided which responds to an applied skid signal for controlling the braking system to release the braking forces on the wheels. Still further, it is contemplated that sensor means provide first and second wheel speed signals having magnitudes respectively representative of the wheel speeds of the first and second spaced apart wheels.

In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, circuitry is provided for generating from the first and second wheel speed signals an average wheel speed signal having a magnitude respectively representative of the average speed of the first and second wheels. Also, circuitry is provided for comparing the average wheel speed signal with a reference signal to provide a skid signal whenever the magnitude of the average signal is less than that of the reference signal. The reference signal is obtained from a reference signal generating means which serves to provide a reference signal which decreases in magnitude when speed of the faster wheel decreases. The reference signal decreases from a magnitude having an initial value representative of the speed of the faster wheel and at a decay rate initially representative of a first deceleration rate. The reference signal generating means also includes circuitry for responding to a skid signal to vary the decay rate of the reference signal from the first rate to a second rate, representative of a slower rate of deceleration so that when the braking forces are released the wheel speed must increase to a higher velocity than that when the first decay rate is effective before the brakes may be reapplied.

In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, logic circuitry serves to provide a skid signal when the wheel speed of one of the wheels differs from that of the other by a predetermined amount. The application of the skid signal to the brake control circuitry is delayed so that additional braking forces may be applied for a limited time to the faster rotating wheel.

In accordance with a still further aspect of the present invention, circuitry is provided for releasing the brake forces so that the wheels may spin-up to the vehicle velocity.

Still further in accordance with the present invention, monitoring circuitry is provided for monitoring at least one operational characteristic of the skid control system and inhibiting operation of the brake control circuitry so that the brakes will not be released if the monitored operating characteristics is not within desired operating limits .

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The foregoing objects and advantages of the invention will become more readily understood from the following description of the preferred embodiment of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings which are a part hereof and wherein:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustration of the skid control system constructed in accordance with the present invention:

FIG. 2 is a schematic circuit diagram illustrating a portion of the circuitry of FIG. 1:

FIG. 3 is a schematic circuit diagram illustrating other portions of the circuitry of FIG. 1; and,

FIG. 4 is a schematic illustration showing still further portions of the circuitry of FIG. 1.

Referring now to the drawings wherein the showings are for purposes of illustrating a preferred embodiment of the invention only and not for purposes of limiting same, FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustration of the skid control system constructed in accordance with the present invention. It is contemplated that the skid control system as disclosed herein be used for controlling the brake forces applied to a pair of spaced apart wheels. Any number of axles may be controlled by applying a like plurality of the control systems, one for each axle.

Generally, the skid control system serves to monitor the wheel speed of the two wheels on the axle being controlled and develop a control signal, referred to hereinafter as a skid signal, if one or more conditions prevail indicative of an incipient or actual skid condition. The skid signal is used to actuate a valve driver circuit which, in turn, energizes a solenoid which acts on the braking system to relieve brake forces. The vehicle's brakes may be air pressure operated or hydraulic operated, and in either case it is contemplated that upon sensing an incipient skid condition, the brake forces on the wheels be relieved to prevent wheel lock-up. If, for example, differences in wheel speeds of the two wheels on the axle being controlled exceeds a reference level a skid signal is developed. A skid signal is also developed if the acceleration of the faster wheel on the monitored axle exceeds a reference level; however, if the acceleration continues and becomes greater than a second reference level the skid signal is removed. Also, if the deceleration rate of the faster wheel is greater than a reference level a skid signal is developed.

The reasons for and conditions causing a skid signal will be explained in greater detail hereinafter, it being the purpose at this point to indicate the general purpose of the skid control system.

Referring now to FIG. 1, the skid control system employs wheel sensors WS-1 and WS-2 for respectively sensing the wheel speeds of the two wheels on the axle being controlled. Any suitable mechanism may be employed for sensing wheel speed. Preferably, however, each wheel speed sensor includes a tachometer generator for developing an alternating signal having a frequency proportional to wheel speed. The frequency signals developed by sensors WS-1 and WS-2 are respectively applied to signal conditioner circuits SC-1 and SC-2. Each signal conditioner circuit includes a frequency to voltage converter for developing a DC signal having a magnitude proportional to the applied frequency signal and, hence, to the wheel velocity. Preferably, although not necessarily, the DC signal is of positive polarity. The wheel velocity signals V.sub.1 and V.sub.2 obtained from the signal conditioner circuits SC-1 and SC-2, respectively, are applied to both a summing amplifier SA as well as to a high wheel speed selector HS. The summing amplifier SA serves to provide an output signal which has a magnitude representative of the average wheel speed of the two wheels being monitored, whereas the high wheel speed selector HS determines which wheel exhibits the greater velocity and to provide an output signal representative of the magnitude of the speed of the faster wheel.

The high wheel speed selector HS is shown in greater detail in FIG. 2 and includes common emitter connected NPN transistors 10 and 12 each having their collectors connected to a B+ voltage supply source and their emitters connected in common through a resistor 14 to ground. The DC velocity signal V.sub.1 is applied to the base of transistor 10 whereas the DC velocity signal V.sub.2 is applied to the base of transistor 12. Consequently, the output signal V.sub.H is proportional to the speed of the higher velocity wheel less a small drop.

The summing amplifier SA is also illustrated in greater detail in FIG. 2 and includes an operational amplifier 16 having a feedback network including resistors 18 and 20. The wheel velocity signals V.sub.1 and V.sub.2 are respectively applied through summing resistors 22 and 24 to the noninverting input of amplifier 16. Consequently, the amplifier serves to provide a positive DC output signal having a magnitude equal to the average of the input signals V.sub.1 and V.sub.2 times the gain (1.5) of the amplifier, as dictated by feed back resistors 18 and 20.

ACCELERATION -- DECELERATION CIRCUITRY

As shown in FIG. 1, the higher wheel speed signal V.sub.H obtained from the high wheel speed selector H.sub.S is applied to an acceleration-deceleration logic circuit AD as well as to a variable deceleration reference circuit DR. Briefly, circuit AD serves to differentiate the high speed signal V.sub.H to provide an output signal representative of rate of velocity change. As will be brought out in greater detail hereinafter, the rate of change output signal is in a positive direction as vehicle wheel speed decreases, and is in a negative direction as the wheel speed increases. The positive, or deceleration, signal is applied to a deceleration comparator circuit DC which serves to compare the deceleration signal with a variable deceleration reference signal obtained from circuit DR. If the deceleration signal exceeds the reference signal then the deceleration comparator circuit DC provides a high or binary "1" output signal which is applied through OR gate OG to actuate the valve driver circuit VD. The valve driver circuit, in turn, actuates a valve solenoid VS to relieve the brake forces.

Similarly, the negative or acceleration signal obtained from circuit AD is applied to an acceleration comparator AC where the acceleration signal is compared with a reference signal. If the acceleration is greater than the reference signal comparator AC provides a skid signal in the form of a binary 1 signal which is applied through OR gate OG to actuate valve driver circuit VD. As will be brought out in greater detail hereinafter, the acceleration comparison is a two-stage comparison in that a skid signal is developed when the acceleration signal obtained from circuit AD exceeds a level representative of 0.5g. If, however, the acceleration increases sufficiently to attain a level representative of 5.0g then an acceleration inhibitor circuit AI responds to this condition to inhibit comparator AC from providing a skid signal. The circuitry to accomplish the foregoing acceleration and deceleration comparison functions is illustrated in greater detail in FIG. 3, to which reference is now made.

The high speed signal VH obtained from the high wheel speed selector HS is applied to the base of an NPN transistor 30 in a low speed cutoff circuit LSC-1. The emitter of transistor 30 is connected to ground through a resistor 32. Transistor 30 serves as an emitter-follower with unity gain. Since it does not conduct below the base-emitter threshold voltage, the derivative circuits are inactive for speeds below this threshold voltage, i.e., under 5 miles per hour. Above this speed, the output voltage from the low speed cutoff circuit is applied to the inverting input of an operational amplifier 36 through resistor 34 and a capacitor 38, in the acceleration-deceleration logic circuit AD. A feedback resistor 40 is connected between the output of the amplifier and its inverting input. Capacitor 38 and resistor 40 provides a differentiation path and a capacitor 42, connected in parallel with resistor 40, serves in conjunction with resistor 34 to provide immunity to high frequency noise. The output signal from amplifier 36 varies in proportion to the rate of change of the velocity of the faster wheel. The signal varies in a positive sense as wheel speed decreases and varies in a negative sense as wheel speed increases.

The output signal from circuit AD is applied to the noninverting input of an operational amplifier 50 in the deceleration comparator circuit DC. The reference signal applied to the inverting input of operational amplifier 50 is comprised of a fixed level and a velocity variable level. The fixed level is obtained from a voltage divider network made up of resistors 52, 54 and 56 connected together in series between a B+ voltage supply source and ground. The velocity variable level is obtained from a second low speed cutoff circuit LSC-2 which includes an NPN transistor 60 having its base connected to receive the high speed signal V.sub.H and its collector connected to a B+ voltage supply source. The emitter of transistor 60 is connected through series connected resistors 62 and 64 to a B- voltage supply source. Consequently, above a low speed level, such as 5 miles per hour, the output signal obtained from the low speed cutout circuit LSC-2, through resistor 66, is proportional to the speed of the faster wheel. Resistors 66 and 56 serve as a voltage divider for this signal which is then applied through resistor 54 to the inverting input of the operational amplifier. When the deceleration signal applied to the noninverting input of amplifier 50 becomes greater, in a positive sense, than the variable reference signal applied to the inverting input, amplifier 50 will provide an output skid signal in the form of a positive or binary 1 signal. This positive skid signal is applied through a diode 70, poled as shown, to actuate the valve driver VD. This will energize the solenoid valve VS to relieve the brake forces on the wheels, permitting them to spin-up toward the vehicle velocity.

As the wheels spin-up, circuit AD provides a negative going acceleration signal representative of the spin-up rate. This spin-up rate is monitored by acceleration comparator AC to provide a skid signal for brake release for acceleration rates between 0.5g and 5.0g. The acceleration produced signal is therefore ignored when the wheels spin-up at a rate greater than 5.0g. This is desirable to offset electrical and pneumatic system delays so that the wheel does not overshoot the ideal velocity for braking. But, the spin-up should not cause the wheel velocity to overshoot that ideal level. It has been determined that a spin-up rate of over 5.0g is indicative of a fast wheel speed recovery and, unless the acceleration produced skid signal is removed, the wheel speed may overshoot the desired level. For this reason, the acceleration comparator is programmed to remove its generated skid signal at the 5g spin-up rate. But, on a low coefficient of friction surface, such as ice, the wheel spin-up rate may never exceed 5.0g and as the wheels approach vehicle speed the spin-up rate will fall off to zero, the brakes being applied when the rate is 0.5g. Therefore, below this acceleration rate the acceleration comparator does not provide a skid signal.

The output signal from circuit AD is applied to the inverting input of an operational amplifier 80 in the acceleration comparator circuit AC. Here the negative going acceleration signal is compared with a fixed reference taken from a voltage divider consisting of resistors 82 and 84 connected between ground and a B-voltage supply source. The junction of resistors 82 and 84 is connected to the non-inverting input of amplifier 80. Consequently, a fixed reference is defined and the values of the resistors are chosen such that the fixed reference is representative of an acceleration level of 1.5g. When the acceleration signal attains a level such that it is more negative than the reference signal, then amplifier 80 will provide a skid signal in the form of a positive or binary 1 signal and this is applied through a diode 86, poled as shown, to actuate the valve driver VD to cause the brake forces to be released.

The positive skid signal provided by acceleration comparator AC will be inhibited if the acceleration signal increases beyond a higher reference level, preferably on the order of 5.0g. The acceleration inhibit circuit AI serves, when this condition is sensed, to remove the positive skid signal to permit brake reapplication. The acceleration inhibit circuitry is illustrated in FIG. 3, to which reference is now made.

The acceleration signal obtained from circuit AD is applied to the noninverting input of an operational amplifier 90 in the acceleration inhibit AI. The acceleration signal is compared against a reference signal applied to the inverting input of operational amplifier 90. The reference signal is obtained from the voltage divider comprised of resistors 62 and 64 and is made speed dependent by its inter-connection with the low speed cutoff circuit LSC-2. When the acceleration signal exceeds the reference signal, i.e., it becomes more negative than the reference signal, the output of amplifier 90 will change from a high level to a low level so as to forward bias a diode 92, poled as shown, connected in its output circuit. This diode forces the input to the noninverting input of amplifier 80 in the acceleration comparator circuit AC to become more negative and thereby prevent the output circuit of amplifier 80 from carrying a positive skid signal. Capacitor 94 connected between ground and the junction of diode 92 and the noninverting input of amplifier 80 serves, in conjunction with resistor 84, to provide an RC time delay to return the acceleration reference signal to its normal level once the output of amplifier 90 has returned to its normal high level. Consequently, so long as the acceleration signal is greater than the fixed reference for the acceleration comparator circuit AC, but less than the reference signal for the acceleration inhibitor circuit AI, a positive skid signal is provided and this signal is applied through diode 86 in OR gate OG to actuate the valve driver VD.

DIFFERENTIAL WHEEL SPEED-FIXED BLEED CIRCUITRY

The average wheel speed signal VA obtained from the summing amplifier SA is applied to a differential wheel speed fixed bleed comparator DFC. This comparator has two different modes of operation. In one mode it compares the two wheel speeds on the axle being controlled, and if the speed of one wheel exceeds that of the other by a fixed amount a positive skid signal is transmitted to the valve driver VD through a time delay network DFD and OR gate OG. In the second mode of operation, comparator DFC serves to compare the average wheel speed (times a gain of 1.5 as dictated by the gain of amplifier SA) with a reference signal having a two stage decay rate. As will be developed in greater detail hereinafter, the decay rate is dependent on the state of the logic circuitry and initially presents a high decay rate followed by a slow decay rate, respectively representative of high and low decelerations.

The first mode of operation takes place whenever the high speed signal VH, representative of the speed of the faster wheel on the axle being controlled, is constant, or is decreasing at a rate less than the first stage delay rate referred to above. With reference to the circuitry illustrated in FIG. 2, the comparator DFC includes an operational amplifier 100 having its inverting input connected to summing amplifier SA to receive the average wheel speed signal VA. The noninverting input of operational amplifier 100 is connected to the output side of a computed speed reference circuit CR which has its input circuit connected to receive the high velocity signal VH from the high wheel speed selector HS. The computed speed reference circuit CR serves to provide a reference signal essentially equal to high velocity signal VH less a diode drop. This is accomplished by applying the high speed signal VH through a diode 102 and a resistor 104 to charge capacitor 106. The capacitor 106 is thereby charged to a level representative of the speed of the faster wheel, less the voltage drop through the charging circuit. Reference circuit CR also includes a diode 110 in the discharge circuit of capacitor 106 together with a diode 112 connected across the series connected circuitry comprised of diode 102, resistor 104 and diode 110. Consequently, at constant speed or during acceleration the voltage at the junction of diode 110 and diode 112, serving as the output of reference circuit CR, is equal to or greater than the voltage stored by capacitor 106. The reference signal applied to the noninverting input of operational amplifier 100 is essentially equal to that of the faster wheel speed VH less the voltage drop across diode 112.

If one of the wheels is rotating substantially faster than the other wheel by a sufficient amount, then the average speed signal VA will be less than the reference signal and, hence, amplifier 100 will serve to provide a positive skid signal. This skid signal is delayed in time by delay circuit DFD before being applied through OR gate OG to actuate the valve driver VD to release the brake forces. This mode of operation ensues so long as the faster wheel speed VH is constant or increasing or is decreasing at a rate less than a predetermined rate.

The second mode of operation of comparator DFC comes into play once the circuitry senses that the faster wheel speed VH is decreasing at a rate greater than a predetermined rate. That is, once the circuitry senses that the faster of the two wheels is decelerating, capacitor 106 will discharge through diode 110 with the discharge rate being controlled by a two stage, fixed bleed circuit FB. The discharge rate of capacitor 106 is controlled in two states so that it initially decays at a rate representative of a percentage of the speed of the faster wheel decreasing at a rate of 1.0g. This is accomplished by limiting the discharge current with a pair of constant drain NPN transistors 120 and 122 in the fixed bleed circuit FB. NPN transistors 120 and 122 have their collectors connected together in common and thence to the junction of diodes 110 and 112. The emitters of the two transistors are connected through resistors 124 and 126 terminating in a common connection and then through a Zener diode 128, poled as shown, to ground, as well as through a resistor 130 to a B-voltage supply source. The base of transistor 120 is connected to ground whereas the base of transistor 122 is connected to ground through a resistor 132. Consequently, both transistors are normally forward biased to drain discharge current from capacitor 106 through the parallel current drain paths provided by the two transistors at a controlled decay rate of 1g. Hence, the computed speed reference signal applied to the noninverting input of amplifier 100 will decay from an initial level, representative of the speed of the faster wheel before that wheel decelerated, at a fast decay rate, on the order of 1g, representative of a maximum brake controlled deceleration rate to be permitted before the brake forces are released.

If the average wheel speed signal VA decreases sufficiently fast then its magnitude will become less than the decaying reference signal and operational amplifier 100 will provide a positive skid signal. The signal, however, is delayed by delay circuit DFD before application through OR gate OG to actuate valve driver VD to relieve the brake forces. This time delay permits the faster wheel to be braked for a longer duration before the brake forces are released in response to the skid signal.

The delayed skid signal or any skid signal is used to actuate the fixed bleed circuit FB to its second stage so that the discharge rate of capacitor 106 iis decreased from a 1g decay rate to 0.5g decay rate. This is accomplished by a feedback network wherein the positive skid signal is applied to the inverting input of an operational amplifier 140. The noninverting input for amplifier 140 is held at a fixed reference level from a voltage divider including resistors 142 and 144 connected between ground and a B+ voltage supply source. The positive skid signal is sufficiently positive relative to the reference level to cause the output of amplifier 140 to be switched to a low level. This level ch