|
|
|
| United States Patent | 3985467 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/3985467.html |
| Inventor(s) | Lefferson; Peter (St. Petersburg, FL) |
| Abstract | A controller maintains a constant desired fluid pressure in a fluid load
driven by a variable flow fluid pump with a variable speed motor. A set
point signal representing desired pressure and a signal from a pressure
transducer representing actual pressure are applied to an error amplifier.
The resulting error signal is applied through a variable gain stage to the
motor control. The variable gain stage includes first and second variable
gain amplifiers the first of which has a gain which is controlled
inversely to pressure. The second variable gain amplifier has a gain which
is controlled in proportion to flow. In this manner, the gain of the
controller changes in inverse proportion to the restriction of the fluid
load. This makes the performance of the controller independent of changes
in the fluid load by keeping the total loop gain constant. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing from US Patent 3985467 |
|
|
Constant pressure pump |
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
October 12, 1976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed is:
1. A control system for maintaining a constant desired fluid pressure in a
fluid load driven by a variable flow fluid pump having a variable speed
motor comprising:
means for generating a set point signal representing said desired pressure;
a pressure transducer responsive to said fluid load for generating an
actual pressure signal;
an error amplifier, said set point signal and said actual pressure signal
being applied to said error amplifier to produce an error signal;
a variable gain amplifier stage including first and second variable gain
amplifiers, said error signal being applied to said variable gain stage,
the output of said variable gain stage being applied to control the speed
of said motor, a signal proportional to pressure being applied to said
first amplifier to change the gain thereof in inverse proportion to said
pressure; and
means for generating a signal representing fluid flow in said load, said
signal representing flow being applied to said second variable gain
amplifier to control the gain thereof in proportion to said flow so that
the gain of said amplifier stage is controlled in inverse proportion to
the variable restriction of said fluid flow.
2. The control system recited in claim 1 wherein said set point signal is
applied to control the gain of said first variable gain amplifier.
3. The control system recited in claim 1 wherein said actual pressure
signal is applied to control the gain of said first variable gain
amplifier.
4. The control system recited in claim 1 further comprising:
a minimum gain loop connected in parallel with said first and second
variable gain amplifiers and between said error amplifier and said motor,
said minimum gain loop providing a small fixed gain between said error
amplifier and said motor to facilitate motor startup.
5. The control system recited in claim 4 further comprising a second
minimum gain loop connected in parallel with said second variable gain
amplifier and between the output of said first variable gain amplifier and
said motor, said second minimum gain loop thereby coupling the output of
said first variable gain stage to said motor when said second variable
gain stage is off during motor startup.
6. The control system recited in claim 1 wherein said first variable gain
stage includes a transconductance amplifier controlled by input bias
current.
7. The control system of claim 1 in combination with a metering pump
comprising:
a cylinder having a piston reciprocating therein, said cylinder having
inlet and outlet ports, said piston transferring quantities of liquid
between said inlet and said outlet as said piston reciprocates. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to constant pressure pumps and more particularly to
a pump which will drive a fluid load with a constant pressure over a wide
range of restrictions of the fluid load.
Precision pumps find many applications in industry and the laboratory.
Metering pumps are used to deliver precise quantities of fluid. Examples
of such metering pumps are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,149,469 and
3,335,670, W. A. Williams.
Metering pumps of the type shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,263,429 and 2,367,893,
Sheen and in U.S. Pat. No. 2,260,734, Saalfrank include a piston moving in
a cylinder with inlet and outlet ports. The piston transfers precise
quantities of liquid between the inlet and outlet ports as the piston
reciprocates. Typically, the piston stroke is controlled by a motor driven
micrometer drive.
Providing a pump which maintains a constant pressure is difficult because
changes in the hydraulic load change the error and stability of the
controller for the pump. It is difficult to neutralize the effect of the
user's hydraulic system and provide constant performance with all fluid
loads.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with this invention, a control system for a pump neutralizes
the effect of the user's hydraulic system and provides constant
performance with all fluid loads.
In accordance with this invention, the loop gain of the entire system is
independent of the fluid load by controlling the gain of a variable gain
stage in response to the restriction of the load. More particularly, the
pressure and the flow of the load control the gains of two variable gain
amplifiers in the control loop.
In accordance with another aspect of this invention, a minimum gain loop is
connected in parallel with the first and second variable gain amplifiers
to provide a small fixed gain thereby facilitating motor startup.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a second minimum loop
is connected in parallel with the second variable gain amplifier to
further reduce the startup time required for the system to reach the
desired flow and pressure upon startup.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention
will be better understood from the following more detailed description and
appended claims.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of the present invention; and
FIGS. 2A and 2B are circuit diagrams of the controller.
DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring to FIG. 1, the pump 11 is of the type having a piston
reciprocating in a cylinder. The cylinder has an inlet and an outlet
indicated at 12 and 13. The piston transfers quantities of liquid between
the inlet and outlet as the piston reciprocates. A variable speed motor 14
drives the piston.
The pump is shown driving a fluid load including valves 15 - 20. Assume
that it is desired to maintain the pressure supplied to these 10 loads in
parallel constant at 100 p.s.i. The pump controller compares the pump
output pressure as sensed by the pressure transducer 21 to a desired set
point pressure from the potentiometer 22. An error amplifier 23 compares
the desired or set point pressure V.sub.r with the actual pressure and
produces an error signal which is applied to the motor control circuit 24
to adjust the speed of the pump 14 thereby maintaining the pressure of the
load constant.
However, this control is quite difficult because the fluid load is
constantly changing. The controller sensitivity error and stability are
normally dependent upon fluid load. Consider an example. Start this
example with only the bottom valve 20 open for a flow rate of 10
gal./hour. A 1 gal./hour change in pump speed will produce a pressure
change of 1 gal./hour .times. fluid load (100 psi/10 gal./hour) = 10 psi.
Next, let all of the valves be open for a pump flow rate of 100 gal./hour.
The same (1 gal./hour) pump speed change will now produce a pressure
change of only 1 gal./hour .times. fluid load (100 psi/100 gal./hour) = 1
psi. Therefore, the fluid load controls the sensitivity of the system
pressure with respect to flow change. If the flow had been turbulent
rather than laminar, this pressure change would have changed by 100 to one
rather than 10 to one. Control error is the difference between desired or
set point pressure and the actual fluid pressure. Assume the error was 1%
of desired pressure in the above 10 load example with only the bottom
valve open. The loop gain went to one tenth of this when all valves were
opened and the error became 9% of desired pressure.
Loop stability is a broad name to describe the pressure overshoot when
desired pressure is quickly changed and the tendency for loop oscillation.
These are functions of hydraulic and electronic time delays and loop gain.
If this simple proportional control system is optimized for fast response
time when all valves are open, it may become unstable as the valves are
closed and the loop gain is increased ten-fold.
Stated another way, the gain of the system including controller and load is
a function of the restriction of the load.
For the foregoing reasons, it is desirable to make the loop gain of the
entire system independent of the fluid load. This is accomplished in
accordance with the present invention by providing a variable gain stage
including a first variable gain amplifier 25 and a second variable gain
amplifier 26 between the error amplifier 23 and the motor control circuit
24. The gain of this variable gain stage is controlled in inverse
proportion to the restriction of the fluid load.
The restriction of the fluid load is proportional to pressure and inversely
proportional to fluid flow. In accordance with this invention, pressure
and flow are sensed. The gain of the amplifier 25 is controlled so that it
is inversely proportional to pressure. In the embodiment shown, the set
point pressure V.sub.r is fed back to the amplifier 25 through gain
control 27. It will be appreciated that actual pressure from the pressure
transducer 21 could also be fed back to control the gain of amplifier 25
because in the steady state, the actual pressure is equal to the desired
pressure so either can be used.
A signal proportional to fluid flow is available at the input of the motor
control circuit 24. Since this signal V.sub.m controls motor speed, it is
also directly proportional to fluid flow. Other signals representing fluid
flow are available in the system and could be obtained, for example, from
a flow sensor at the output of the pump. The flow signal V.sub.m is
applied through the gain control circuit 28 to control the gain of the
variable gain amplifier 26 so that its gain is directly proportional to
flow. Where the flow is turbulent instead of laminar the gain of amplifier
26 is controlled in proportion to the square of flow.
Because the gain of amplifier 25 is inversely proportional to pressure and
the gain of amplifier 26 is proportional to flow, the gain of the stage
which includes these two amplifiers is inversely proportional to the fluid
load restriction. That is, as the fluid load restriction goes up, the gain
of the stage including amplifiers 25 and 26 goes down. In this way, the
overall system gain remains constant regardless of changes in the load.
In this manner, the response time and loop error can be maintained constant
over a wide dynamic range. For example, accuracy of 1% of desired pressure
can be maintained over a dynamic range of 10,000. This can best be
appreciated when it is considered that the ten valve example described in
FIG. 1 has a dynamic range of only 10 whereas the controller of this
invention is capable of handling a dynamic range of 10,000.
When the pump is first started, the variable gain amplifier stage will be
shut off. Therefore, a minimum gain loop 29 is provided for startup. This
has an electronic gain of 0.99 (0 db). If the fluid load is light, that
is, the fluid gain is small (low pressure and high flow rate) the time to
reach the steady state will be quite long. The pump must start at a very
low flow rate because the desired pressure is low and because the
electronic gain is at its lowest value. This startup situation is greatly
improved by providing a second minimum gain loop 30 in parallel with the
second amplifier stage and between the output of amplifier 25 and motor
control 24. By adding the minimum gain loop 30, the pump starts fast and
the controller gain is no longer unity. This can be better understood from
the example given in the following table.
__________________________________________________________________________
CONTROLLER
GAIN AT CONTROLLER
START UP FLOW
START WITH-
GAIN WITH
RATE FOR ZERO
DESIRED OUT START
START UP LOOP
ACTUAL START UP
PRESSURE UP LOOP AT START PRESSURE
__________________________________________________________________________
50 psi
= 0.5V 1.0 110 3 ml/min.
500 = .5 1.0 11.0 3 ml/min.
5000 = 5.0 1.0 1.1 3 ml/min.
__________________________________________________________________________
The advantages of the invention will be better understood with reference to
the specific example shown in FIG. 2.
The error amplifier 23 is the first stage with a gain of 1. The error
signal is applied to a voltage divider including resistors 31 and 32 and
then to the first variable gain stage 25. The variable gain stages are
transconductance amplifiers which are current sources controlled by the
input signal voltage and by the gain control input bias current. The gain
of the variable gain amplifier 25 is a function of desired pressure. In
this example, the gain has a range of -14 to +26 db (0.2 to 20). The
output of amplifier 25 is applied to the variable gain amplifier 26 the
gain of which is a function of flow rate. The gain range of amplifier 26
is -26 to 14 db (0.05 to 5.0) for a flow of 0.1 to 10 ml/min.
The output of the variable gain amplifier 26 is converted into voltage by a
conventional operational amplifier circuit 33, the output of which is
applied to the output stage 34. The output stage 34 has a constant gain of
100.
The minimum gain of the complete controller is set by a minimum gain loop
which includes resistor 35, resistor 36, resistor 37 and resistor 38. When
both variable gain stages 25 and 26 are off, the controller gain is 1.
A second minimum gain loop includes resistor 39. This makes the controller
startup as short as possible. The first variable gain stage 25 is set
before startup by the desired pressure or set point signal from the
potentiometer 22. When the second variable gain stage 26 is off, the first
variable gain stage output is applied directly through the minimum gain
loop including resistor 39 to the input of the amplifier 33.
The gains of the variable gain stages 25 and 26 are controlled by two
identical bias current sources. The source controlling the variable gain
amplifier 25 includes transistor 40 and an operational amplifier 41 which
converts voltage to current. A DC set point signal V.sub.r representing
desired pressure is derived from potentiometer 22. It is applied through
operational amplifier 42 to operational amplifier 43. The output of
operational amplifier 43 is equal to 0.5/V.sub.r. This signal is converted
to current by the transistor 41 which controls the bias current supplied
to the variable gain amplifier 25. The gain stages have memory which, in
this instance, is provided by the capacitor 44. Assume the control system
has reached steady state into some fluid load. Desired pressure is then
changed. With a constant fluid load, the controller gain should not
change. The capacitor 44 in the bias current source provides this memory.
The new steady state of pressure and flow is seen with little delay. Then
the variable gain stages slowly shift with one going up while the other
goes down. The total gain is unchanged.
The bias current source for the second variable gain amplifier 26 includes
transistor 45 and operational amplifier 46. This circuit receives a signal
proportional to flow and controls the gain of amplifier 26 in proportion
to flow.
The transistor 47 provides a startup time delay.
Operational amplifier 48 is a conditioning amplifier for the actual
pressure signal from the pressure transducer. The output of amplifier 48
is applied to the error amplifier 23.
The output of the controller shown in FIG. 2 is taken from the amplifier
34. It is applied to a motor control circuit. While various types of motor
control circuits may be used, a phase lock loop type of control circuit is
particularly suitable.
While a particular embodiment of the invention has been shown and
described, various changes may be made without departing from the true
spirit and scope of the invention. The appended claims are, therefore,
intended to cover all such modifications.
* * * * *
|
|
|
|
|
Description  |
|