|
|
|
| United States Patent | 4007309 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/4007309.html |
| Inventor(s) | Sewell; James (Ypsilanti, MI) |
| Abstract | An expandable honeycomb structure adapted to be suspended between stacks of
articles of freight or between a stack of articles of freight and a wall
and having spaced strips of relatively stiff material defining certain
cell walls to resist sagging of the structure by its own weight and undue
"hour glass" distortion due to vertical elongation of certain of the
cells. In one embodiment readily foldable strips are interspersed with
relatively stiff strips of corrugated paperboard having their corrugations
running lengthwise. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing from US Patent 4007309 |
|
|
Sag resistant honeycomb load spacer |
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
February 8, 1977 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
July 12, 1973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
| Market Size |
|
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market
sector:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Market Share |
|
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Reasonable Royalty |
|
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
|
| | |
| |
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
|
| Market Size | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Market Share | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Reasonable Royalty | N/A | [No votes] |
| | N/A | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
I claim:
1. A structure expandable to form a honeycomb structure comprising a stack
of elongated generally flat strips of sheet material, the strips of said
stack being secured to adjacent strips at spaced and staggered positions
whereby said stack may be expanded to define a honeycomb slab having a
multiplicity of cells; a majority of said strips being readily foldable
along lines transverse thereto, at least adjacent those regions where they
are secured to adjacent strips; the strips other than said majority of
said stack being stiffer, in a direction lengthwise thereof, than said
majority of stirps and resistant to folding along said transverse lines,
said other strips being relatively few in number and being separated in
said stack by a plurality of said majority of strips whereby said other
strips prevent undue vertical elongation of said cells when said slab is
suspended from its upper edge portion, said majority of strips comprising
corrugated paperboard arranged with the corrugations thereof extending
transversely of said strips; said other strips being of corrugated
paperboard arranged with the corrugations thereof extending lengthwise of
said strips. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention is in the field of dunnage devices and particularly such
devices formed of expandable honeycomb slabs.
Expandable honeycomb slabs of sheet material, usually corrugated
paperboard, have been used for dunnage in loads of freight. They are
usually suspended in position and held expanded by their own weight. When
such a spacer structure is suspended from its top, and particularly if it
is of considerable depth, the weight of the honeycomb structure tends to
elongate at least the upper and mid portions and the cells therein in a
vertical direction and thus draw the lateral edges of the structure
inwardly to an "hour glass" shape to an excessive degree. U.S. Pat. No.
3,593,671, issued July 20, 1971, to Glenn D. Bramlett, assigned to the
assignee of the present application, describes one proposal for
eliminating excessive hourglassing. The present invention is an
improvement thereon.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention largely eliminates the hourglass effect described
above by replacing some of the freely foldable strips of material normally
used to form the honeycomb with relatively stiff strips to resist undue
vertical elongation of the cells of an expandable honeycomb structure.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic view of an expanded honeycomb structure, illustrating
the undesirable hourglass effect;
FIG. 2 is a schematic view similar to FIG. 1 but showing an expanded
honeycomb structure embodying the present invention; and
FIG. 3 is a fragmentary perspective view of a portion of FIG. 2.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The use of expandable honeycomb slabs as dunnage devices in loads of
freight is known and the construction of the honeycomb slabs is more or
less conventional. The honeycomb structure usually comprises strips of
double-faced corrugated paperboard or the like superimposed to define a
stack of flat strips with adjacent strips being adhered at spaced and
staggered positions so that the stack may be expanded to open-celled
honeycomb configuration. When such a structure is suspended, and
particularly if the vertical dimension is considerable, the weight of the
material forming at least the lower portion of the structure is sufficient
to unduly stretch the slab in a vertical direction and thus draw opposite
side edges of the spacer structure inwardly more than is desired. FIG. 1
illustrates the honeycomb effect referred to. In that figure, numeral 2
indicates generally the conventional honeycomb slab expanded from a stack
of strips adhered as described above. Conventionally, the upper edge of
the slab is adhered to a rigid member 4 by which it is suspended in the
desired location. As illustrated, the upper cells 6 expand downwardly but
as one moves downwardly along the slab, the cells are expanded a greater
amount in a vertical direction and reach a maximum somewhere between the
top and bottom, as illustrated by the cells 8. The cells near the bottom
of the slab are not usually unduly elongated in the vertical direction
because the weight of the slab material therebelow is small. Since the
strips of material from which the honeycomb structure is formed are
substantially inextensible and of constant total length, the side edges 10
of the slab necessarily are drawn inwardly. FIG. 1 illustrates the
hourglass effect in a somewhat exaggerated manner but it is obvious that
when such a structure is intended to be positioned between stacks of
articles of freight, the narrow portions of the slab may not engage and
hold all of the articles in this stack.
FIGS. 2 and 3 illustrate the improvement of the present invention and
wherein numeral 4 also indicates a stiff or rigid supporting member. In
constructing conventional honeycomb devices, all of the strips of material
are readily bendable in a direction transverse to their length and are
usually scored or otherwise treated adjacent those regions where they are
secured to other strips to facilitate bending and opening of the cells.
This ready bendability encourages the hourglass effect previously
described. The present invention comprises the interposition in the stack
of bendable strips of a plurality of relatively stiff strips 12 which are
highly resistant to bending or folding although it is preferred that they
be not completely rigid as is the member 4. By providing a relatively
stiff strip 12, the effect illustrated in FIG. 2 is produced wherein only
a small amount of hourglass distortion occurs between the strips 12 or
between a strip 12 and the supporting member 4. Preferably, the strips 12
are placed in the stack of strips during manufacture only after a
plurality of readily bendable strips have been assembled. In other words,
the relatively stiff strips 12 are separated in the stack by a plurality
of flexible strips. It has been found that in a slab having, for example,
16 plies of strip material two stiff strips 12 are adequate, spaced, for
example, as the fifth and 10th strips from the top.
The relatively stiff strips 12 may be of any suitable material having the
desired characteristics and by way of example, FIG. 3 illustrates one
suitable form. In FIG. 3, numerals 14 identify readily bendable strips of
material each comprising double-faced corrugated paperboard arranged with
its corrugations 16 extending transverse to the length of the strips and
those strips are conventionally provided with score lines at 18 to
facilitate bending thereof at the edges of those areas that are adhered to
adjacent strips, such as the areas 20. The relatively stiff strips 12 may
likewise be of double-faced corrugated paperboard but are constructed with
their corrugations 22 extending lengthwise of the strip to thus give the
strip considerable rigidity and stiffness. While FIG. 3 shows the
honeycomb structure as being expanded with the strips 12 remaining
substantially straight, it is to be understood that the strips 12 will
bend or fold slightly although they will resist such bending and maintain
the expanded structure in generally the form illustrated schematically in
FIG. 2.
As stated previously, the strips 12 may be of any suitable material, not
necessarily corrugated paperboard. If made of corrugated paperboard, they
should be of slightly heavier weight than the other strips in the stack.
They could, for example, be a solid paperboard structure or the like.
Applicant has found that normally only about two relatively stiff strips
are needed for each honeycomb structure and it is preferred that they be
separated by about four or five readily bendable strips 14. It has also
been found that the provisions of the relatively stiff strips is necessary
only in the upper two-thirds of the honeycomb structure.
While a limited number of specific embodiments have been shown and
described, it is understood that other modifications may be resorted to
within the scope of the appended claims.
* * * * *
|
|
|
|
|
Description  |
|