WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Teaching apparatus    
United States Patent4012852   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/4012852.html
Inventor(s)Journot; Vida M. (5913 Quality Hill, Smithfield, TX 76080); Deyo; Charles R. (Fort Worth, TX); Hunnicutt; Jack B. (Fort Worth, TX)
AbstractAn electronic speech therapy teaching apparatus for use by a speech therapist includes a silent timer with an associated electronic digital display, an adjustable aural speech rate device, an automatic calculator for computing a student's percentage of correct responses, an electronic display of the accumulation of total and correct responses, and controls to select and operate the various features of the apparatus. The silent timer selectively counts up or down, informing the operator when counting down, through an audio/visual alarm, when a predetermined time period has expired. The adjustable aural speech rate device produces tones at a rate appropriate for the speech student. Manually controlled switches enable the operator to register and display the number of correct and total responses during the evaluation procedure. An automatic computer calculates the percentage of a student's correct responses as they are registered by the operator.
   














 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History
Drawing from US Patent 4012852
Teaching apparatus - US Patent 4012852 Drawing
Teaching apparatus
Inventor     Journot; Vida M. (5913 Quality Hill, Smithfield, TX 76080); Deyo; Charles R. (Fort Worth, TX); Hunnicutt; Jack B. (Fort Worth, TX)
Owner/Assignee     Jounot; said Vida M. (TX)
Patent assignment
All assignments
Publication Date     March 22, 1977
Application Number     05/561,916
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     March 25, 1975
US Classification     434/362 434/185
Int'l Classification     G09B 005/06
Examiner     Oechsle; Anton O.
Assistant Examiner     Hum; Vance Y.
Attorney/Law Firm     McHugh; Charles W.
Address
Parent Case    
Priority Data    
USPTO Field of Search     35/1 35/8 R 35/9 R 35/9 A 35/9 B 35/9 D 35/11 R 35/35 C 35/48 R 35/48 B 179/1 MN 235/61.1 E 235/154 235/156
Patent Tags     teaching
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
2430205



[0 after 0 votes]
2564089



[0 after 0 votes]
3186109



[0 after 0 votes]
3350793



[0 after 0 votes]
3412484



[0 after 0 votes]
3748754
LaBerge
434/335
Jul,1973

[0 after 0 votes]
3656243
Segal
434/336
Apr,1972

[0 after 0 votes]
3579870
Bennett
356/313
May,1971

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


What is claimed is:

1. Apparatus for recording the performance of a student who is responding to a test environment including a first counter recording a quantity of "correct" signals, a second counter recording the quantity of "correct" and "incorrect" signals, the "correct" and "incorrect" signals being generated by an operator in response to a student's answer, and further including a quantity display for selectively displaying a quantity of "correct" signals from the first counter or the quantity of "correct" and "incorrect" signals from the second counter, the improvement comprising:

first circuit means responsive to the quantity of "correct" and "incorrect" signals of the second counter and generating a signal varying in frequency with the recorded quantity,

second circuit means responsive to the quantity of "correct" signals in the first counter and generating a signal varying in frequency with the recorded quantity,

third circuit means responsive to the signals varying in frequency of said first and second circuit means to generate a percentage signal varying with the percentage of "correct" signals generated for the recorded quantity of "correct" and "incorrect" signals, and

percentage display means responsive to the percentage signal for indicating the percentage of "correct" signals generated for the recorded quantity of "correct" and "incorrect" signals.

2. Apparatus for recording the performance of a student as set forth in claim 1 wherein said third circuit means includes:

latch means responsive to the frequency signal of said second circuit means and connected to the second counter and said percentage display means for transferring thereto a signal representing the percentage of "correct" signals.

3. Apparatus for recording the performance of a student as set forth in claim 1 wherein said first circuit means includes a programmable decimal counter responsive to a frequency input and to the quantity of "correct" and "incorrect" signals of the second counter for generating the frequency signal of said first circuit means.

4. Apparatus for recording the performance of a student as set forth in claim 3 wherein said second circuit means includes a programmable decimal counter responsive to a frequency input and to the quantity of "correct" signals recorded in the first counter for generating the frequency signal of said second circuit means.

5. Apparatus for recording the performance of a student as set forth in claim 1 including a third counter also recording the quantity of "correct" and "incorrect" signals and further including accumulator display means connected to the third counter for indicating the accumulated quantity of "correct" and "incorrect" signals generated by an operator in response to a student's answer.
 Description Submit all comments and votes
 


This invention relates to equipment for use by speech therapists and the like in testing, evaluating and modifying the speech habits of those persons who are considered to have a speech handicap.

Among those extraordinary people who have frequently been neglected in times past have been those people who exhibited what is commonly called a speech handicap. This neglect has not always been intentional, because certainly there have been relatives and close friends, as well as professional people such as speech pathologists, etc., who have been very concerned about the welfare of such handicapped persons. But mere "concern" or "sympathy" by others usually has not been enough to make much difference in the speech habits of most persons; what has been needed has been hardware, instruments, programs and other tangible "tools" with which the handicapped can be helped. In particular, there has long been a dearth of equipment with which to evaluate a person's handicap with sufficient accuracy (and speed) so that a therapist could promptly begin constructive work with the person--without spending a lot of time in unfruitful exploration. For example, if a child has a handicap such that he continually stutters, it usually doesn't take an observer very long to discern this fact. And if that child who once stuttered has been helped to full speech fluency, it shouldn't take an observer too long to conclude that the problem has been solved. But, regrettably, there has not really existed any equipment with which to accurately evaluate performance somewhere between these two extremes, i.e., equipment which would permit a clinician to quickly say with assurance that a child is performing 10% or 15% better this week than he did last week. Neither has it been possible to demonstrate with empirical data that a given therapy program is more cost effective than another program because the first program repeatedly provides more improvement at a lower cost. Hence, it is believed that the absence of any specialized equipment for measuring speech abnormalities in a scientific manner has contributed to the prolongation of some rather laborious trial-and-error techniques in speech therapy that should have been abandoned (or at least drastically modified) long ago.

Too, in order to determine if a person with a speech handicap is being helped by a particular program of therapy, it is fairly obvious that tests should first be performed to find out what is the person's beginning level of speech capability. This initial testing of the degree of a person's specific speech errors is commonly referred to as establishing a baseline for the specified speech behavior of the client or "subject". Although it is so logical that a baseline or beginning point should be established at the inception of any program of therapy, until recently there were no widely accepted or standardized procedures which could be used by various clinicians throughout the country in order to evaluate the degrees of a person's speech errors. While each so-called expert in speech therapy usually had his or her preferred test routines and training techniques, there were essentially no empirical data for hundreds or thousands of different handicapped persons which might be useful in discovering which tests or training techniques seemed to be more reliable than others, or which therapy techniques seemed to be more beneficial than others and to which students. Hence, the lack of standardized instrumentation for monitoring the performance of different persons has tended to inhibit major progress in dealing with many difficulties in human speech.

Another way in which speech therapists have been ill-equipped and hence ill-prepared to perform a service is that they have not been able to ascertain within a minimal period of time whether or not a child's speech difficulty was modifiable. That is, therapists usually have not been able to tell with only minimal therapy whether a child's speech problem can be helped (with proper therapy) or whether it is probable that the defect will never respond to therapy. If the problem is not modifiable, and it is not promptly diagnosed as such, then a lot of valuable time can be wasted in trying to train a child to do something which he physically just cannot do.

While it is believed that the absence of specialized equipment for speech therapy has been a hinderance to clinicians, it is not meant to suggest that there have been no tools at all available in the past. Admittedly, there have been certain items which have been adapted for use in measuring speech behavior, but which were not originally designed for such tasks and therefore (in many cases) had characteristics that made them less than fully satisfactory. For example, most all clinicians have worked at some time or another with stop watches, finger-actuated mechanical counters, electric clocks, kitchen timers, metronomes, pencil and paper, etc.; each of these instruments and tools was initially designed for a use which was completely unrelated to speech therapy, and often such tools just would not meet the requirements for efficient speech therapy. For example, commercially available timers (such as one might find offered in a department store for household use) do not measure time as precisely or as accurately as is needed for many types of speech testing, including the establishment of diadochokinetic rates and vocal-weightedness. The inaccuracy (and noise) of household timers could of course be avoided by using reliable stop watches of the type used in competition sporting events, etc.; but a clinician's activities with a handheld stop watch can sometimes be distracting to children who are being tested, such that their test results might not always be valid. In addition, behaviors which are inaudible cannot be counted if the clinician must watch a clock. Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to provide an instrument which is specifically designed for use in testing, evaluating and modifying the speech of those persons who have been considered to have a speech handicap.

A significant part of this invention is concerned with a silent clock or timer which is ideally suited for use by a speech clinician, in that it can be used to count time "up" from zero (in order to give the clinician a ready indication of elapsed time since a testing session began), or, by activation of a suitable switch, the timer may be used to count time "down" from a preset quantity (such as 5 or 15 minutes). When counting down, the expiration of the selected time period is usually announced in either of two ways: visually alone (as with a blinking light), or by the combination of a short noise from a buzzer together with a blinking light.

Another part of the unit comprises what will be referred to herein as an automatic percentage computer, which includes decimal counters for recording the number of correct and incorrect responses by the student being tested; individual judgment as to correctness is provided by either the clinician or the student. Two buttons (switches) are provided on the face of the unit, one of which is pressed when a correct response has been given and the other being pressed when an incorrect response has been given. A first decimal counter records only signals generated when the "correct" button has been pressed; a second decimal counter records signals which are generated by both the "correct" and "incorrect" buttons, and a third decimal counter also records signals which are generated by both the "correct" and "incorrect" buttons, but it is cleared by a separate switch to enable the recording of the accumulation of all "correct" and "incorrect" responses when the first and second counters are reset. A digital display is provided on the face of the instrument to reveal the number of correct responses and/or the total number of responses that have been recorded, as well as a separate display for the accumulation of the total number of responses for some predetermined number of exercises. An additional readout is connected to circuitry which automatically divides the number of correct responses by the total number of responses, after each entry of a response into a memory bank; of course, this readout constitutes the percentage of correct answers--and it provides the clinician with an immediate report of performance by the student.

A third major part of the speech therapy unit constitutes an adjustable aural speech rate device that produces "beep" tones that are adjustably spaced to provide an appropriate "pace" for a stuttering student's speech in order to achieve complete fluency. The device includes not only a manual control for the rate at which pulse tones are generated, but it also includes a volume control so that the intensity of a "beep" tone can be optimized for each individual student. The pulse tones may be projected into a room through a loudspeaker incorporated into the unit, or privately provided to a headset worn by the student. This device constitutes a significant improvement over conventional metronomes, in that it makes it possible for a plurality of students to be working in the same room (with one speech therapy unit per student) under the supervision of a single clinician, and each student may be receiving--through his or her individual headset--a pulse tone of optimum intensity at an individually selected rate. While the clinician may be supervising the use of a variety of therapy programs in the room, neither she nor the students will be exposed to the confusion that would stem from a plurality of different "beep" tones being continually broadcast into the room.

While each of the three above-described sub-units of the speech therapy unit could be operated independently of the other sub-units, when they are combined in operation they tend to provide a synergistic effect that makes the unit described herein a significant contribution to the field of speech therapy. Hence, the unit will be described hereinafter as a composite unit in which all of the display means, switches, controls, power supplies, etc., are physically contained in one housing--because this is the preferred embodiment of the invention, but it should be understood that fragmenting the various devices into separate housings would be feasible. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be measured only in terms of the claims appended hereto, with such reference as is appropriate to the specification and the drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a front elevation view of a preferred embodiment of the invention, showing the various displays, signal buttons, and controls housed in one unit;

FIG. 2 is the block diagram of a programmable up/down clock, capable of displaying the time in minutes and hundredths of minutes;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an automatic percentage computer with counters and displays for the correct, total and accumulated number of responses;

FIG. 4 is the block diagram of an adjustable aural speech rate unit of the speech therapy apparatus;

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of the immediate audio feedback unit of the speech therapy apparatus;

FIG. 6 is a schematic of the programmable up/down clock and the associated alarm unit of the speech therapy apparatus; and

FIG. 7 is a schematic of the circuit components for a crystal oscillator, an automatic percentage computer, an adjustable aural speech rate device and an immediate audio feedback with audio and visual means of alerting students.

Referring specifically to FIG. 1, a speech therapy unit 20 is shown with a face plate 22 which is preferably located such that it is visible by the operator but not by the person being studied--at least during the early or "testing" phase of a program of speech therapy. During a later "speech modification" phase, the unit 20 may well be turned around so that the student can see the face plate and serve as the operator. For convenience hereinafter, the term "student" will usually be employed to refer to the person having a speech handicap, and the term "clinician" will usually refer to that person who is controlling the testing and/or attempting to improve a student's speech.

Referring initially to the first of three major subunits of the device 20, an electric clock 24 is provided at a suitable location on the face 22. The purpose of this clock 24 is obviously to monitor the passage of time, and the unit is descriptively labeled accordingly. The clock 24 comprises a display means including a face or readout means 26 for indicating minutes and portions thereof. Preferably, the readout means 26 includes a digital display face which is adapted to indicate minutes as well as tenths and hundredths of minutes. Two digital display units such as SP 752 displays can be appropriately used in the clock, since they provide a readily visible and silent means of displaying time.

A time selector means 28 is also provided as part of the clock 24, and it preferably comprises a digital selector means in which numerals are displayed on the periphery of a set of wheels, and the wheels are turned by means of protrusions which are easily engaged by a person's finger. A switch 160 is provided in a circuit (to be described) which triggers the transfer of a selected time from the selector means 28 to the readout 26. The circuit is such that it will always cause the readout 26 to register the time which is set in the selector means 28 upon manual activation of the switch 160, regardless of whether the readout 26 was earlier manifesting a greater or smaller time than the time shown on the face of the selector means 28. A reset switch 150 is also provided to drive the readout means 26 to zero. A start/stop switch 100 is provided to make the connection between a source of power and a time keeping circuit for energizing said circuit. The switch 100, then, serves to both initiate and halt the change of time which is manifested by the display means 26.

A switch 108 is electrically connected to the time keeping circuit for establishing whether the clock is to count time "up" (as from zero) or to count time "down" from a preselected time (toward zero). In the "countdown" mode, the time which is manifested by the readout means 26 will eventually reach zero when the clock has run long enough. In order that the clinician need not continually turn to face the display 26, it is appropriate that an alarm of some kind be provided to announce that time has expired. However, there are certain students who might be distracted by an audible alarm. Accordingly, a switch 38 is preferably provided so that the operator may select either an audible alarm or strickly a visual alarm. Visual notification of the expiration of time is preferably given by a blinking light 40 located at the top of the time monitor unit. In order that the audible alarm would not unduly interfere with a testing program which is under way, it is preferred that any sound (such as the noise made by a buzzer) be relatively short; but to make sure that the out-of-time notice rendered by said buzzer is not forgotten, it is preferred that a visual display element (such as the blinking light 40) be energized at about the same time that the buzzer is energized. In such an embodiment, the light 40 should blink continually until it is manually halted by actuation of the "preset" switch 160--which returns the unit to a ready condition for renewed count-down operation.

As a further means of rendering the time-counting operation "fail safe", another alarm feature is advantageously built into the unit . . . in order to prevent the operator from unknowingly pressing the start button 100 for "countdown" operation without first making sure that the display means 26 is not already at zero. That is, if the operator has failed to program a desired time period into the clock by pressing the "Preset" button 160, then the clock would have nothing to count down to; pressing the Start button 100 would be useless. If the operator was unaware that he had failed to set the time monitor 24 correctly, he might spend a substantial period of time before realizing that the display 26 was not changing. To avoid this potential oversight by an operator, an alarm is given if an attempt is made to start the clock in a countdown mode when the display 26 is already at zero. Of course, the actual alarm hardware that is used to provide this result can be essentially the same alarm hardware which is utilized to alert the operator to the fact that a given period of time--which was once imparted to the display means 26--has expired.

Referring next to the second major sub-unit of the device 20, a calculator-type instrument is incorporated in the device to provide an instantaneous readout concerning the performance of a student. Of course, in dealing with students having a speech handicap, there is really no precise way that a student's performance can be mechanically graded--at least with today's technology. Hence, as a student attempts to repeat a series of words or read a sentence, etc., it will still be necessary for a clinician or other person to make a value judgment as to the correctness of the student's performance. Too, there are many ways in which a student may be asked to demonstrate his capability of making certain sounds or vocalizing certain words. For simplicity herein, however, it will probably be most convenient to speak merely in terms of "test questions" which are answered either correctly or incorrectly (even at the risk of taking some liberties with the term "question"). That is, if the student is asked to say the word "red" and he pronounces it like "wed" then the clinician would be expected to record that the student has given an incorrect response--which, of course, is like answering a question with the wrong answer.

In times past, it has been possible for a clinician to sit in front of a student with pencil and paper and record the number of "correct" and "incorrect" responses. And, after a certain period of time, the clinician could count the various answers and even determine what the percentage of correct answers has been--with a slide rule or calculator. However, in speech therapy, it is important not only to listen to a student's performance but also to observe what the student is doing with his lips, his tongue, etc. Accordingly, any manual activity which is required on the part of the clinician that prevents her from devoting full attention to the student has been a hinderance to accurate analysis of the student's handicap. Too, any time which is being consumed by the clinician in making calculations, keeping records, writing down the quantity of responses, etc. is administrative time that truly is not being spent in helping the student.

To overcome these difficulties of the past, the calculator unit 50 includes a first means including a circuit (to be described) and a button or switch 218 for generating an electrical signal in response to an operator's judgment that the student has answered a test question correctly. A first memory within the unit receives and stores the quantity of "correct" signals generated by this first means. A second means including a circuit (to be described) and a button or switch 200 is provided for generating an electrical signal in response to an operator's judgment that the student has answered a test question incorrectly. A second memory is provided in the unit 50 for recording the quantity of all signals which are generated by the operator, including both "correct" and "incorrect" signals. A third memory is provided for recording and accumulating all such signals generated by the operator for both "correct" and "incorrect" signals, and it retains such accumulation when the second memory is blanked. A readout 56 is provided to display for the benefit of the operator the quantity of signals that have been recorded in the first or second memories. To economize on the number of physical readout components, it is possible to employ the same readout to render a status report from these two different memories; and, when this is done, a toggle switch 58 is provided to switch the readout 56 from connection with the first memory to connection with the second memory. The operator, then, would be able to exercise her own judgment as to which of these two quantities she would rather have displayed at any given time. A reset button 260 is provided for erasing the first and second memories in order to return the unit to a cleared condition for recording performance in a subsequent test. In order to prevent the loss of all stored information about a student's work during a test session, however, it is preferable that still another memory be provided which is adpated to provide a cumulative total of all questions asked. The display 62 is provided to make this third memory's contents available to the operator. It would usually be cleared only at the conclusion of a therapy session by actuating the counter clear button 64.

Of course, the electric displays 56, 62 provide a much neater manner of recording answers than the old fashioned pencil and paper; but actually they are probably no more accurate than a pencil and paper, and there might still be a chance of an arithmetical error if the clinician had to study the displays and then transfer the entries from the displays 56, 62 to a remote calculator. To avoid the possibility of human error (such as might happen if the clinician transposed a number, etc.), a dividing circuit is provided to repetitively and automatically divide the number of "correct" signals recorded in the first memory by the total number of signals recorded in the second memory. This division is accomplished after each entry of a signal into the memories, and a display 66 is provided for indicating in visual form the quotient which is obtained from that division step. Of course, that quotient will be recognized as being numerically equal to the percentage of correct answers, i.e., moving the decimal point two places to the right converts the quotient to a percentage. Because this percentage is visible to the operator immediately after each answer has been entered into the instrument, the operator need not turn his or her attention far away from the student in order to have an accurate knowledge of the student's performance. Because of this particular arrangement of on-going information flow to the clinician, she is now able to monitor and continually evaluate the relative success or failure of any given therapy technician in terms of student progress.

The signal buttons 100, 218, 200 are clearly shown as being present on the face of the instrument; but there may well be occasions when an operator's repetitive arm movement toward the unit 20 might become a distraction to a student. Hence, it is preferred that a remote control box 68 be provided with additional buttons or switches mounted thereon--which buttons would be connected in parallel with the buttons 100, 218, 200 for starting and stopping the clock, and recording "correct" and "incorrect" answers. The remote control hand switch also allows the student, once he has been taught to accurately discriminate between correct and incorrect production of target behavior, to record his own correct and incorrect responses without touching the instrument. In this way, childern as young as 6 or 7 years of age may actually conduct much of their own therapy practice sessions with only minimal supervision, and without risk of damaging the instrument. It is also possible that the clinician may prefer that the student have some sort of immediate indication of how each of his responses was graded. To this end, a pair of indicator lights 70, 72 are provided on the top of the unit 20 where they may be seen by both the operator who is scoring a test and the student who is being tested or trained. Toggle switches 71, 73 are also provided so that the lights can be switched out of the circuit when their use is not wanted. A color coordination scheme for the buttons is preferably followed throughout the unit 20, so that a correct answer is recorded by the operator by pressing either the green button 218 on the face 22 or the green button 218A on the remote control device; naturally a green light 70 announces to the student that his response was deemed to be satisfactory. The "incorrect" button 200 on the unit and the button 200A on the remote control box are preferably red; and the lens 72 on top of the unit 20 is also red--for indicating that the student's response was not satisfactory.

While the operation of the switches 100, 218, 200 is essentially silent, it may be desirable from time to time for a clinician to render some sort of an auditory feedback signal to the student without interjecting any particular emotion into the signal. This is made possible with an auxiliary buzzer (which is preferably somewhat offensive) and a button 74 which can be pressed by the operator to generate the offensive buzzing noise. In order to accommodate students whose need for correction or whose sensitivity may be somewhat at variance with other students, a volume control 76 for this offensive buzzer is provided. By use of a yellow button 74 and a yellow light 78, the clinician can communicate with the student in a somewhat formal way, and can--for example-- indicate disapproval of certain behavior, can remind the student to concentrate on the subject matter, can signal the passage of an inordinate amount of time in which to respond, etc. Also, under certain circumstances the student may progress in therapy to the point where he can utilize the unit 20 all by himself, and may grade himself on his pronunciation of certain words, etc. In such a situation, the student may be facing the instrument and pressing either the "correct" button 218 or the "incorrect" button 200; and the clinician can be somewhat removed from the location of the instrument, having only the remote control unit 68 in her possession. If the student then grades himself in a manner that the clinician does not agree with, the clinician can indicate her disagreement by actuating the switch 74A on the remote control box 68, thereby causing the offensive buzzer to be activated.

The third substantial sub-unit of the instrument 20 includes a speech rate generator 80, which includes a pulse rate control 82 and a volume control 84. Of course, this portion of the unit is connected to either a loudspeaker or a headset adapted to be worn by the student, whereby the pulse tones generated by the unit may serve to pace the student's speech. A volume control 88 is provided to adjust the volume of the pulse tones. It is probably easiest for the generator 80 to be simply energized and operating at all times when the unit 20 is powered, and the volume control 84 is adapted to turn the level of pulse tones down so low that they cannot be heard, i.e., essentially zero volume.

A microphone jack 86 and a headphone jack 87 are provided in the device 20 to allow the student to monitor his own amplified speech, as well as to privately hear the pulse tones generated by the unit 80. Too, the headset makes it possible for a clinician to privately inform the student of an error (through the use of the IAF button 74) without anyone else in the room being distracted by her action.

Line power to the instrument 20 is controlled by a toggle switch 90, with an indicator lamp 92 providing a visual indication that power is applied to the instrument.

Referring to FIG. 2, there is shown a logic diagram of a presettable up/down timing apparatus (clock) that displays time in hundredths of minutes. The clock consists basically of a gate controlling a 100 pulse per minute signal that activates four series connected decade counters which simultaneously control displays that give an indication of the time represented by these four counters.

A start/stop flip-flop 102 has one input terminal connected to a timer start/stop switch 100 and a second input terminal receiving a 100 Hz signal from a source (not shown). Starting the clock by momentarily closing the start/stop switch 100 applies a logic low at this input of flip-flop 102, thereby sending a signal from the output terminal Q of the flip-flop that is at a logic high. Similarly, stopping the clock by again momentarily closing startstop switch 100 changes the input terminal of flip-flop 102 to a logic low, thereby reversing the signal from the output terminal Q of the flip-flop to a logic high.

The signal from the output terminal Q of flip-flop 102 is applied to an input terminal C of a timer reset flip-flop 104. When this signal to input terminal C changes from logic low to logic high, then an output terminal Q of flip-flop 104 is logic low, thereby producing the complement of this signal at an output terminal Q that is put in a logic high state.

The signal from the terminal Q of the reset flip-flop 104 is sent to an input terminal of a timer pulse NAND gate 106, which has a second input terminal receiving a 1.66 Hz signal from a source (not shown). Pulse NAND gate 106 produces a 100 pulse per minute signal at its output terminal only when the signal from the flip-flop 104 is in a logic high state. The signal thus generated by pulse NAND gate 106 is applied to a timer up/down switch 108 that enables a series of four decade counters 110, 120, 130 and 140 to count either up or down. When the operator selects the count up mode, the up/down switch 108 is set to send the pulse train from NAND gate 106 to the "up" input terminal of the "hundredths" decade counter 110. Likewise, when the operator selects the count down mode, up/down switch 108 is set to send the pulse train from NAND gate 106 to the "down" input terminal of the "hundredths" decade counter 110.

In the countup mode, the "hundredths" decade counter 110 adds one for each pulse received from the NAND gate 106. When the "hundredths" decade counter 110 has counted nine times in this manner, the next pulse resets this decade counter to zero and carries one pulse forward to the "tenths" decade counter 120, causing it to add one. The minutes decade counter 130 and the "tens" decade counter 140 are similarly connected in series when counting up so that the higher decade counter is pulsed once for every tenth pulse received by the next lower decade counter.

Prior to operation of the countdown mode, the decade counters 110, 120, 130 and 140 are loaded with a starting time in the form of a binary coded decimal digit that is preset from a corresponding ten position BCD complement thumb switch 112, 122, 132 and 142. An operator actuated preset switch 160 enables loading the decade counters 110, 120, 130 and 140 with the predetermined value.

When the countdown mode, the pulse train from NAND gate 106 is received at the "down" input of the "hundredths" decade counter 110. Each pulse to the counter 110 borrows (or subtracts) once from the previous value in this counter. When decade counter 110 steps to zero, the next incoming pulse is unable to borrow from this counter and is sent to the "down" input terminal of the "tenths" decade counter 120, borrowing one from it and reloads the counter 110 to enable the subtraction to continue from the decade counter 110. Thus, the next higher decade counter is pulsed once every ten times the lower decade counter is pulsed. The minutes decade counter 130 and the "tens" decade counter 140 are similarly connected when the clock is in the countdown mode.

In either a countup mode or a countdown mode, a binary coded decimal digit in the "hundredths" decade counter 110 is displayed as a decimal digit in digital display 116 by a "hundredths" digital driver 114 which receives the signal from the "hundredths" decade counter. Similarly, a "tenths" digital display 126, a minutes digital display 136, and a "tens" digital display 146 simultaneously display the decimal value of their corresponding decade counters 120, 130 and 140. Each of the displays 126, 136, and 146 is connected to the corresponding decade counter through respective digital drivers, i.e., a "tenths" digital driver 124, a minutes digital driver 134, and a "tens" digital driver 144.

An operator actuated switch 150 enables resetting the decade counters 110, 120, 130 and 140 to zero and shutting off the signal from the NAND gate 106. First, momentarily closing reset switch 150 enables a signal to be sent through a zero reset inverter 152 that changes its output from a logic low to a logic high. This signal from the reset inverter 152 is applied to decade counters 110, 120, 130 and 140, thereby resetting these counters to zero. Secondly, momentarily closing the reset switch 150 applies a logic low signal to an input of a preset/reset NAND gate 170, thereby changing the logic low outpt signal to a logic high. This output signal is applied to the input of a preset/reset inverter 172 which produces an output signal at a logic low state. This output signal is in turn applied to an input terminal R of the timer reset flip-flop 104 which operates to toggle or reset the logic state at the output terminal Q of this flip-flop. Reversing the logic state at the output terminal Q from high to low changes the logic state of the signal at the input terminal of pulse NAND gate 106 from logic high to logic low, thereby terminating the pulse output from the NAND gate.

Momentarily closing preset switch 160 enables the presettable up/down clock to perform three functions. The operation of loading decade counters 110, 120, 130 and 140 with a BCD value preset in thumb switches 112, 122, 132 and 142 has already been mentioned. Secondly, closing preset switch 160 applies a signal at a second input terminal of the preset/reset NAND gate 170 that is at a logic low. This provides a logic high signal at the output terminal of NAND gate 170, and the effect of this signal is the same as described above in the operation of reset switch 150.

Finally, closing preset switch 160 enables the operator to set a zero alarm latch 162 that holds a logic output state indicating that some valve has been loaded into the decade counters. The borrow output terminal of the "tens" decade counter 140 applies a pulse signal to a second input terminal of the alarm latch 162, when all decade counters have reached zero. This signal resets the logic state at the output terminal of the alarm latch 162. This output is applied to an input terminal T of a zero alarm one shot 164. The one shot 164 produces an output signal at its terminal Q that is applied to the input terminal of an alarm 166 signaling that either a countdown operation has been attempted when all decade counters are zero, or that the countdown operation has been completed. Alarm 166 may use either audio or visual means of signaling the operator.

The following example will serve to illustrate the operation of the up/down clock of FIG. 2. If the operator desires to time a ten minute exercise, then ten minutes are preset on BCD thumb switches by placing a "1" in BCD thumb switch 142 and "0's" in BCD thumb switches 112, 122 and 132. These numbers are loaded into decade counters 110, 120, 130 and 140 by momentarily closing preset switch 160, and these numbers are simultaneously displayed in the displays 116, 126, 136 and 146. The up/down switch 108 is moved to the down position so that the clock is now ready for operation. Momentarily closing start/stop switch 100 starts the clock by generating a signal of 100 pulses per minute at the output of pulse NAND gate 106. The clock begins to count down and simultaneously displays the remaining time in the counters, continues counting until either the start/stop switch 100 is again closed, or the decade counters step to zero to indicate the preset time has expired. When time expires, all decade counters will show zero and a borrow pulse will set zero alarm latch 162, thereby signaling the operator through alarm 166 that the ten minute period has elapsed.

The operation of the clock in counting up is similar to the operation described above. The operator sets up/down switch 108 in the up position and has the option of counting up from time zero or some preset time loaded through BCD thumb switches 112, 122, 132 and 142. The operator actuates the clock in the same manner by momentarily closing start/stop switch 100. The clock will continue to run until the operator closes start/stop switch 100.

Referring to FIG. 3, there is shown a block diagram of a percentage computer for the computation of the percentage of the correct responses given by a speech student during the operation of the testing apparatus. The percentage computer includes means to compute and to display the percentage of correct responses, means to count both correct and total response and means to display either the n