|
Claims  |
|
|
It is claimed:
1. A sun tracking solar energy collector comprising:
azimuth framework means,
means supporting said azimuth framework means for horizontal rotation about
a vertical axis,
a pair of arcuate rails, means supporting said arcuate rails at one end
extending vertically from said azimuth framework means,
a parabolic reflector,
wheel means supporting said parabolic reflector on said arcuate pair of
rails,
counter balance means for counter balancing the weight of said parabolic
reflector,
first motor means coupled to said counter balance means for causing said
parabolic reflector to assume different desired elevations, and
second motor means coupled to said means supporting said azimuth framework
means for causing said azimuth framework means and therewith said
parabolic reflector to assume predetermined azimuthal positions.
2. The apparatus as described in claim 1 wherein said parabolic reflector
has focal point and there is included:
energy converting means fixed in location, and wherein
said rails are curved about a circle whose axis is horizontal and passes
through said energy converting means, so that said reflector is shifted as
it turns so that its focal point can remain on said energy converting
means.
3. Apparatus as recited in claim 2 wherein there is included:
gimbal means for supporting said energy converting means, and
means for pivoting said energy converting means to always face said
parabolic reflector.
4. A sun tracking energy collector comprising:
a solar energy receiving means;
a concave mirror for concentrating sunlight onto said receiving means;
a curved track;
an azimuth frame supporting said curved track;
means for supporting said azimuth frame in rotation about a substantially
vertical axis;
said azimuth frame supporting said curved track so it is curved in a
substantially vertical plane; and
means for moveably supporting said mirror on said track to move therealong
and maintain said mirror at a constant orientation with respect to the
portion of track on which the mirror rests, so that the axis of the mirror
rotates as it moves along the track which is curved in a vertical plane.
5. The apparatus described in claim 4 wherein:
said receiving means is fixed in location with respect to the ground;
said means for supporting said azimuth frame is positioned so that said
vertical axis passes through said receiving means; and
said track is curved about a horizontal axis which extends through said
receiving means, and said means for moveably supporting said mirror on
said track includes a plurality of elements mounted at fixed locations
with respect to said mirror and moveable along said track.
6. A sun tracking energy collector, comprising:
a solar energy receiving means;
means for mounting said receiving means at a fixed location with respect to
the ground;
a concave mirror for concentrating sunlight on said receiving means; and
means for rotatably supporting said mirror in rotation about a vertical
axis passing through said receiving means and in rotation about a
horizontal axis passing through said receiving means.
7. The apparatus described in claim 6 wherein:
said means for rotatably supporting said mirror includes a track extending
along a circle which has a horizontal axis passing substantially through
said receiving means, and means for supporting said track in rotation
about a vertical axis passing substantially through said receiving means.
8. The apparatus described in claim 6 wherein:
said receiving means is rotatably mounted so it can follow said mirror, and
including
cable means connecting said mirror and said receiving means, to turn said
receiving means without forcing it to shift location. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to systems for collecting solar energy and more
particularly to improvements therein.
A comparison of solar energy collected by typical non-tracking systems,
single-axis systems, and two axis systems is able to harvest 78-80% of the
available direct normal radiation, whereas the single axis system collects
30-35% and the non-tracking system collects between 17 and 20%. Of further
interest is that the non-tracking systems provide a collection temperature
of between 300.degree.-400.degree. F., single axis trackers between
500.degree.-600.degree. F., but temperatures in the range of between
1000.degree.-2000.degree. F. may be easily attained by two axis tracking
systems. Thus, from the foregoing, it can be seen that a two axis solar
energy collection system is clearly superior. However, the superior
performance of the two axis system, unfortunately, is not a determinant as
to which system is selected. Such items as initial cost and operating
costs, etc. are also taken into consideration. Accordingly, the key to
taking advantage of a much higher potential performance of a two axis
system is to achieve an initial cost, as well as operating expense levels,
which will be less in proportion to the output derived than those from the
other systems. Stated in another way, the system which should be selected
should be the one that has the lowest cost per kilowatt of electricity
derived.
OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
As object of this invention is to provide a solar tracking and energy
collecting system which has a substantially low manufacturing and
maintenance cost.
Another object of this invention is to provide an improved two axis sun
tracking solar energy collection system which has a lower cost per
kilowatt of output energy than presently known systems.
The foregoing and other objects of the invention may be achieved in an
arrangement whereby a parabolic reflector, which collects the energy, is
supported on an elevation frame which in turn is supported upon an azimuth
frame. The azimuth frame has a triangular support system wherein it pivots
about one point of the triangle and has wheels at the other two points of
the triangle which ride on a peripheral circular track. The elevation
structure is supported on the azimuth structure and has two curved rails
describing a vertical arc and extending sufficiently so that the parabolic
reflector which rides on wheels captured in the rails can be moved from a
horizontal to substantially a vertical position. Suitable propulsion means
are provided for the azimuth frame so that it can describe a 360.degree.
rotation. The means for moving the parabolic reflector include a counter
balance to reduce the amount of energy required to move the reflector from
one end to the other of its curved rails. Suitable and well known sun
tracking circuits are provided to generate the signals required to drive
the azimuthal and elevation motors to maintain the parabolic reflector
facing the sun.
A heat engine or solar flux receiver is mounted separately on a small tower
so as to be positioned at the focal point of the parabolic reflector. The
heat engine may be mounted in a gimbal and tethered to the parabola
structure by a system of cables in order to keep the receiver pointed
along the axis of the parabola.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the
appended claims. The invention will best be understood from the following
description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a view in perspective of an embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 2 is a view in elevation of an embodiment of the invention, with the
parabola shown in section to provide a better view of the supporting
structure.
FIG. 3 is a rear view of the embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 4 is a block schematic diagram exemplifying circuits for a suitable
sun tracking arrangement which may be employed to provide tracking signals
to the embodiment of the invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Considering now the respective FIGS. 1, 2, and 3 of the drawings, the
embodiment of the invention comprises a a parabolic reflector 10 which has
an open grid support structure 12. The support structure 12 rests upon
three pairs of wheels, respectively 14, 16, and 18, only one of each pair
being shown in FIG. 2. The three pairs of wheels are captured by two
spaced, curved rails respectively 20, 22, which describe a curve which
extends vertically and which has a length sufficient to enable the
reflector to move from a horizontal to substantially a vertical position.
The curved rails and their immediate support structure constitute the
elevation frame for the reflector. The curved rails are supported on the
azimuthal frame 24, which comprises two spaced beams respectively 24a, 24b
to which the curved rails are attached as by supports 26, 28, 30.
The azimuthal frame 24 is supported and restrained at the center by a
pivot, 32. The pivot may be anchored in concrete, 34. At two other points,
wheels 36, 38 support ends of the respective rails 24a, 24b of the
azimuthal frame on a circular track 40.
From the foregoing it will be seen that the structural relationship between
the reflector support structure and the azimuthal frame is a triangular (3
point) load transfer configuration. This kinematic relationship will
prevent a deflection of either structure from imposing a strain on the
other. This kinematic feature also permits large tolerances, on the order
of .+-. one inch radial deviation to be used in the fabrication of the
azimuthal frame curved rails. One of the azimuth wheels, 36, is driven by
an azimuth actuator, 42, in order to provide the azimuth drive motion.
The parabolic structure is counterbalanced about its elevation axis by a
pendulum cable system, including a pendulum 50, which rotates about a
pivotal point 52. An azimuthal actuator motor 54, pulls on a cable 56,
which rides over a fixed pulley system 58, and then extends to a moveable
pulley system 60, which is then attached to the pendulum 50.
Both the elevation and azimuth actuators are coupled to their respective
drive systems with effectively anti-back lash linkages. This allows the
use of standard commercial gear boxes for the makeup of the drive
actuators.
The mirror surface of the parabolic reflector may be made by mounting
second surface glass mirror segments to a series of monocoque panels that
will cover the parabolic structure. The glass is attached to the panels by
discrete fasteners in order to be free of strain that is caused by thermal
expansion.
The construction of the system is such that the control axes, both azimuth
and elevation, are arranged to intersect at the focal point of the
parabola. As a result, the solar energy receiving means which comprises a
heat engine 62, may be mounted independently of the parabolic reflector
and its structure at the focal point of the parabolic reflector. It is
mounted on a small tower 64. It may be mounted in a gimbal 66, and
tethered to the parabola structure by a system of cables 68A, 68B, etc.
This will keep the receiver pointed along the axis of the parabola. These
cables may be equipped with spring damping systems, not shown, in order to
minimize dynamic interaction between the separate structures that might be
caused by wind induced vibration. The solar heat receiver, may comprise,
for example, thermionic diodes, which generate electricity in response to
the received heat. The electricity may be conducted down the tower to a
utilization device 70.
It can be seen that the tracks 20, 22 extend along a circle with an axis
which is horizontal (so that the tracks are curved in a vertical plane)
and which also passes through the energy receiving means 62, and that the
tracks are in turn mounted to rotate about a vertical axis which passes
through the energy receiving means 22. The rollers 14, 16, 18, which are
fixed in location relative to the mirror, maintain the mirror at a
constant orientation with respect to the track portion on which the
rollers rest, so that the axis of the mirror rotates as it moves along the
curved track.
FIG. 4 is a block schematic diagram of a system for generating the
electrical signals required to maintain the parabolic reflector oriented
in the direction of the sun. This is shown by way of illustration, and is
not to be considered as a limitation upon the invention since systems of
this sort have been used by such organizations as the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration. A sun position sensor 72, produces as an output,
signals respectively respresentative of elevation and azimuth of the sun.
A solar tracking position signal generator 74 which may comprise two
potentiometers, the respective moveable arms of which are positioned to
represent the location of the parabolic reflector in elevation and azimuth
produce two electrical signal outputs respectively representative of
reflector elevation and azimuth. The respective elevation and azimuth
representative signals are respectively subtracted in subtractors 76 and
78, whereby the subtractor 76 produces a difference signal at its output
representing the difference between the sun's elevation and that of the
parabolic reflector, and the subtractor 78 produces a difference signal at
its output representing the difference in azimuth between the sun's
position and the parabolic reflector. The respective difference signals
are respectively applied to the elevation motor drive unit 80 and to an
azimuth motor drive unit 82. The respective outputs of the elevation motor
drive unit and azimuth motor drive unit are respectively applied to
elevation motor 54 and azimuth motor 42, which operate to maintain the
parabolic reflector tracking the sun in its path across the sky. The sun
is tracked only for the purpose of energy collection, not navigation. This
allows a larger tracking error, 0.1.degree., than is conventionally used
for space navigation, with resultant economies throughout the design of
the mechanism and control system.
The unique design configuration, transfers the load from the azimuth frame
to the parabolic support structure at or near the optimal restrain points
of its radial trusses where the effects of the load distribution moments
are minimized. This reduces the steel usage in the parabolic reflector
with regard to its required loading.
The large tolerances allowed for the fabrication of the curved rails on the
azimuth frame by the kineomatic relationship between it and the parabolic
reflector support structure minimizes construction costs. The sun tracking
deviations .+-. 0.4.degree., occurring at 0.03.degree. per hour, that
might be caused by these tolerance-induced errors are accounted for by the
control system with no increase in complexity or cost.
There has accordingly been described and shown hereinabove a novel and
useful sun tracking solar energy collecting system. Cost estimates which
have been made by breaking the assembly into its component parts, with
each part being separately costed out and including tooling and process
planning as well as the labor required indicates a proposed cost of $16.00
or less per square foot of reflector. A 60-foot reflector appears to
produce a cost optimum.
* * * * *
|
|
|
|
|
Description  |
|