|
|
|
| United States Patent | 4140007 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/4140007.html |
| Inventor(s) | Bosland; Steven C. (Enfield, CT);
Kingston; William H. (Windsor Locks, CT) |
| Abstract | In order to determine the percentage of suspended solids in a slurry, a
hollow tube is extended into a slurry tank in which the solids are kept in
suspension by a mixer. The tube allows the liquid within it to be isolated
from the action of the mixer, so the solids settle out of the tube. A
pressure difference between points at the same elevation inside and
outside of the tube is measured, and this gives a percent-solids
indication in which error due to dissolved solids is negligible. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing from US Patent 4140007 |
|
|
Suspended-solids meter |
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
February 20, 1979 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
March 24, 1978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to determining the amount of solids present
in a slurry. This determination is necessary in the operation of certain
types of air-quality control systems in which a slurry is sprayed into
fume-laden gases in order to remove certain pollutants. It is necessary
for proper operation that the percentage of solids in the slurry remain
within predetermined limits.
In the past, the percent-solids determination was made by measuring the
density of the slurry. It was found that this method was not entirely
satisfactory because the specific gravity of the slurry is affected not
only by the presence of suspended solids but also by solids dissolved in
the liquid. If the effect of dissolved solids were ignored, large
inaccuracies would result because small changes in the specific gravity of
the liquid portion of the slurry could appear to be large changes in the
percentage of suspended solids. Thus, it was necessary to calibrate the
instruments repeatedly in order to take into account the change in
specific gravity of the "process liquid."
This recalibration problem was solved by Schuetz (U.S. Pat. No. 4,047,891),
who suggested employing the process liquid in a bubbler pressure sensor in
order to eliminate the effect of a change in process-liquid specific
gravity. In one of the normal methods of testing specific gravity, the
difference in pressure between two elevations in a container of liquid is
sensed. The pressures are transmitted to a differential pressure sensor
through two fluid lines through which fluid is continually fed into the
container. Schuetz suggested using the process liquid as the fluid, and
this had the result of virtually eliminating the effect of the
process-liquid specific gravity on the percent-solids measurement. As can
be seen in the drawings in the Schuetz Patent, which is hereby
incorporated by reference, the process liquid used in the bubbler is taken
from a thickener tank. The thickener tank is located outside the reaction
tank in which the slurry that is to be used in the scrubber is contained.
The process liquid from the thickener then flows through appropriate
valving to the reaction tank, and in doing so it serves as the medium
through which the pressure to be sensed is transmitted.
The present invention is an improvement over the Schuetz method in that the
method and apparatus of the present invention permit the measurement to be
carried out more simply. In addition, they avoid the possibility that
operator error could permit the slurry to back up through the wrong tubes
and thereby damage equipment. Furthermore, they ensure that the properties
of the process liquid used in the measurement are as close as possible to
those of the process liquid that is actually in the reaction tank.
The present invention is a method and apparatus for measuring the
suspended-solids content of a liquid in which the suspended solids have a
tendency to settle. A vessel for containing liquids is provided, as are
means for agitating liquid contained in the vessel. The agitating means
are provided so that any solids in the liquid remain in suspension. A tube
extends into the vessel interior, and the tube is hollow and open at its
lower end so that it will contain some liquid when the vessel contains
liquid up to a level high enough to reach the tube. This tube isolates the
liquid contained in it from the action of the agitation means, so the
solids in the tube are allowed to settle out. The difference between the
pressures at two points of equal elevation, one inside and one outside the
tube, is sensed, and this gives an accurate indication of the
suspended-solids content of the liquid in the vessel.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
These and further features and advantages of the present invention are
described in connection with the drawing, which is a somewhat
diagrammatical rendering of the apparatus of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
The FIGURE shows a vessel 10 that contains a slurry up to a level 12.
Appropriate agitating means are suggested by member 14, a diagrammatic
respresentation of a mixer. Though a mixer is not necessary, some
agitating means is required, even if it only comprises an inlet and outlet
that set up the currents in the slurry, so that the solids suspended in
the slurry will not settle out. A hollow tube 16 is shown extending into
the vessel, and its bottom end is open so that liquid can enter it. As
will be appreciated from the description below, the liquid inside the tube
16 will in general have a specific gravity lower than that of the rest of
the slurry, and it is for this reason that the level inside the tube is
shown as being higher than the general level 12. Appropriate pressure
sensors 18 and 20 are located at equal elevations in the liquid, one being
inside the tube 16 and the other being outside it. Both sensors 18 and 20
are suspended at a vertical distance H above the bottom of the tube 16.
Pressure signals are shown being transmitted by means of lines 22 and 24
to an appropriate difference-indicating means 26, the output of which is
set to whatever control or indicating equipment is desired. Sensors 18 and
20 could be transducers that send electrical signals to a differential
amplifier included as part of element 26. Alternatively, elements 18 and
20 could be nothing more than the inlets to fluid conduits represented by
elements 22 and 24, and element 26 would then be a differential pressure
transducer. Whether these or other means are used, the essence is that
some means be provided for sensing the difference in pressure between
points of equal elevation in a liquid, one being inside and the other
being outside the tube 16.
In operation, vessel 10 would typically be the reaction tank of an
air-quality control system. Slurry would be contained in the tank and
would be continuously withdrawn to be sprayed into flue gases, the spray
passing through the flue gases and falling back into the reaction tank.
The makeup of the slurry in the reaction tank is continually controlled by
adding water and reactants and bleeding off some of the slurry. This
control would be performed at least partially in response to the signal
from the means for sensing pressure differences. The mixer 14 keeps the
solids in the slurry in suspension, so the solids are homogeneously
dispersed in the slurry. Within the tube 16, however, the currents caused
by the mixer 14 are not present, and the solids can settle out, leaving
only the process liquid. As a result, the pressure at sensor 18 is equal
to the pressure at the bottom of the tube, in inches of water, diminished
by the product of the vertical distance H and the specific gravity of the
process liquid. The pressure at sensor 20, on the other hand, is equal to
the pressure at the bottom of the tube 16 diminished by the product of the
vertical distance H and the specific gravity of the slurry. Thus, the
output signal from the element 26 is proportional to the difference
between the specific gravity of the slurry and the specific gravity of the
process liquid:
.DELTA.P = (P.sub.O - H .multidot. SG.sub.PL)-(P.sub.O - H .multidot.
SG.sub.SL) (1)
.DELTA.p = h (sg.sub.sl - sg.sub.pl), (2)
where .DELTA.P is the pressure difference in inches of water indicated by
the sensors 18 and 20, P.sub.O is the pressure at the bottom of the tube
16, H is the vertical distance in inches between the bottom of the tube
and the sensors, SG.sub.SL is the specific gravity of the slurry, and
SG.sub.PL is the specific gravity of the process liquid.
Solids content can be inferred from the .DELTA.P indication and equation
(2) by taking advantage of the fact that the difference in specific
gravities is approximately equal to the difference between unity and the
specific gravity that the slurry would have if the process liquid were
pure water:
SG.sub.SL - SG.sub.PL .apprxeq. SG.sub.W/SS - 1, (3)
where SG.sub.W/SS is the specific gravity that the slurry would have if
there were no dissolved solids in the process liquid. By using equations
(2) and (3), one can determine SG.sub.W/SS from the .DELTA.P indication,
and it is a simple matter to determine solids content from SG.sub.W/SS :
##EQU1##
where SG.sub.SS is the specific gravity of the solids and r is the
fraction of suspended solids in the slurry by weight.
It is to be noted that this method assumes as an equality the approximation
given by Equation (3), so there is still some inaccuracy introduced by the
method. However, this inaccuracy is quite small, and it compares favorably
with the method in which the solids content is inferred from the specific
gravity of the slurry alone without consideration of process-liquid
specific gravity.
Consider, for example, a slurry that has 10% undissolved solids suspended
in a process liquid with a specific gravity of 1.02. Assuming a
suspended-solids specific gravity of 2.5, the present invention will
indicate a suspended-solids content of 10.05%. If the suspended-solids
content were to be inferred merely from the specific gravity of the
slurry, on the other hand, an assumption of no dissolved solids would
yield an indication of 12.9%. Clearly, the inaccuracy introduced by
Equation (3) is more than made up for by the elimination of the error
inherent in the other method.
It can be appreciated that the foregoing description discloses a very
simple method of measuring solids content. In addition is simplicity,
increased accuracy is also afforded because the process liquid used in the
measurement is the same liquid that is in the vessel at the very instant
of measuring. Furthermore, since the tube is located in the vessel, any
inaccuracy that could be caused by a difference in temperature between the
process liquid used for measurement and the process liquid actually in the
tank is eliminated. Finally, since the method and apparatus of the present
invention do not use a bubbler, there is no possibility of damage
resulting from slurry backing up into the equipment.
* * * * *
|
|
|
|
|
Description  |
|