|
|
|
| United States Patent | 4202365 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/4202365.html |
| Inventor(s) | Aoki; Tadashi (Ohmiya, JP);
MacAfee; Jerry D. (Northborough, MA);
Donnelly; James F. (Leicester, MA) |
| Abstract | Disclosed is a fire-tested butterfly valve having an annular resilient seat
member and an annular, flexible metal seat member, both held in place in a
valve housing by being clamped between cooperating surfaces of the valve
housing and a valve seat retaining ring insert. In a first embodiment, a
fusible washer with a lower destruction temperature than that of the
annular resilient seat is positioned between the resilient seat and the
metal seat. In a second embodiment, an integrally formed protrusion on the
annular resilient seat contacts the metal seat. In both embodiments, the
metal seat is held out of contact with the butterfly disc until exposure
to a fire melts the fusible washer or the seat protrusion, at which time
the metal seat comes into contact with the disc to establish a secondary,
metal-to-metal, fire resistant seal. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing from US Patent 4202365 |
|
|
Fire tested butterfly valve |
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
May 13, 1980 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
January 4, 1978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application is related to the commonly assigned patent application
Ser. No. 866,870 entitled "Fire-Safe Butterfly Valve" by Tadashi Aoki,
filed Jan. 4, 1978.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to rotary fluid control valves of the butterfly
valve type. These valves have a circular fluid flow channel therethrough
and a circular disc mounted for rotation between an open position, in
which the disc lies substantially parallel to the axis of the fluid flow
channel through the valve, and a closed position in which the disc lies
perpendicular to this axis. Conventionally, the disc edge contacts a
relatively soft or resilient annular seat circumscribing the fluid flow
channel when the valve is in the closed position, and the sealing contact
between these members will shut off fluid flow through the channel.
Valves of the type just described have not commonly been used in certain
applications requiring fire-tested valves. Briefly stated, fire-tested
valves are valves that must function as conventional valves in general
service, but which must be able to survive exposure to a fire occurring in
their environment. Many older, conventional valve types such as gate
valves, globe valves and plug valves are metal-to-metal seated, and thus
are assumed to be fire resistant. Soft-seated valves, on the other hand,
must be certified fire-tested because of several industrial fires several
decades ago which were eventually attributed to leakage from rubber or
soft-seated valves during a "small" fire, which thus spread out of control
when fed by that leakage. Thus, as is apparent, fire-tested valves are
often used in flammable fluid service. One of the basic requirements for a
fire-tested valve is that there be no loss of performance attributable to
the safety feature. Since normally a fire does not occur during the life
of the valve, it is expected to function just as a conventional valve
would, with equivalent pressure and temperature ratings and cycle life.
But, it is also expected to seal within standardized limits after a fire.
Several examples of industry standards for fire testing are: American
Petroleum Institute (Division of Refining) Standard 607 for Fire Test for
Soft Seated Ball Valves; American Petroleum Institute (Division of
Production) Standard for Fire Test for API SPEC 6A and 6D Valves; and Oil
Companies Materials Association Specification No. FSV. 1, Fire Safe Test
for Soft Seat Ball Valves. As is apparent from the titles of those
specifications, the most common fire-tested soft seated valves are the
ball valve type.
A further desirable feature in butterfly valves is the ability to shut off
liquid flow coming from either side of the disc. Many existing butterfly
valves are unidirectional, i.e., only one side of the valve may face the
upstream side of the flow line if sealing efficiency is to be maintained.
It is, of course, desirable for the valve to be capable of shutting off
and controlling fluid flow regardless of the direction from which the
fluid pressure is applied to the valve.
Still a further desirable feature in butterfly valves is the ability to
enhance the sealing effectivenss of the valve by means of the pressure
against the seat by the fluid being controlled. Many existing butterfly
valves have seat configurations that cannot take advantage of the forces
generated by the line pressure when the valve is closed.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a butterfly valve
suitable for service with flammable liquids that may be certified as a
fire-tested valve, yet provide a simple structure with improved sealing
characteristics.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a butterfly valve
with the aforementioned fire-tested feature and also to be capable of
shutting off and controlling fluid flow regardless of the direction from
which fluid pressure is applied to the valve.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a butterfly
valve with a fire-tested feature, an ability to control fluid flow
regardless of its direction, and also to enhance the sealing effectivenss
of the valve by means of the line pressure, at least as it bears against
the resilient seat.
Other objects will become apparent from a consideration of this disclosure.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The butterfly valve of this invention is of a type wherein the butterfly
disc element is mounted on a shaft for rotation about an axis
perpendicular to the axis of the fluid flow channel. The butterfly disc
has a flange extending from one planar surface thereof, and the shaft
passes through and is attached to this shaft so that the disc edge will
form an unbroken sealing surface circumscribing the entire circumference
of the disc.
The annular resilient seat member circumscribes the fluid flow channel and
is located so that it will cooperate with the disc sealing surface when
the valve disc is closed. An interference fit exists between the resilient
seat and the disc edge to improve the sealing effectiveness therebetween.
An annular, flexible metal seat member also circumscribes the fluid flow
channel and is adjacent the resilient seat. Interposed between the metal
seat and the resilient seat is either an annular fusible washer, in a
first embodiment, or a protrusion integrally formed on the resilient seat
member, in a second embodiment. The metal seat is constructed in a flat
form, but during assembly of the valve, the metal seat is forced into a
conical or Belleville-like shape so that it is biased toward the resilient
seat although the washer or protrusion prevents the metal seat from
normally coming into contact with the disc.
Both the resilient seat member and the metal seat member are clamped in a
groove formed by cooperating surfaces in the valve housing and a ringlike
valve insert member. The insert is bolted to the housing by a plurality of
bolts spaced about its extent.
If the valve of the first embodiment should be exposed to fire, the fusible
washer melts and is destroyed, and the inherent flexing or biasing action
of the metal seat causes it to displace toward the resilient seat.
Continued exposure to heat will destroy the resilient seat but the metal
seat comes into contact with the sealing edge of the butterfly disc and
establishes a secondary, metal-to-metal, fire resistant seat.
The integral protrusion on the resilient seat of the valve of the second
embodiment serves essentially the same function as the just discussed
fusible washer. When the valve is exposed to fire, the resilient seat
begins to melt and deforms. The protrusion also melts and deforms, thereby
allowing the metal seat to flex and come into contact with the sealing
edge of the disc to establish a secondary, metal-to-metal, fire resistant
seat.
As a further feature of the valve of the present invention, the resilient
seat is constructed consistent with the teachings of commonly assigned
U.S. Pat. No. 3,608,861 so that line pressure from either direction
enhances the sealing effectivenss between the disc and the seat.
Further features of the invention will be apparent from a consideration of
the detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the butterfly valve
and a consideration of the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is an elevation view, partially in cross-section, of a butterfly
valve of the type disclosed as this invention;
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the zone of cooperation between the
annular resilient seat, the metal seat, and the sealing surface of the
disc of a first embodiment of the valve of the instant invention.
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the zone of cooperation between the
annular resilient seat, the metal seat, and the sealing surface of the
disc of a second embodiment of the valve of the instant invention.
DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Depicted in FIG. 1 is a valve 10 having a housing 11 defining flow channel
12 of circular cross-section therethrough, butterfly disc 13 mounted for
rotation with shaft 14, annular resilient seat 15 and seat retainer ring
16.
The fluid flow channel 12 has an imaginary flow axis indicated at 13a.
Shaft 14 is essentially perpendicular to flow axis 13a. The shaft is
mounted for rotation in valve housing 11 with the aid of lower bearing
means 17 and upper bearing means 18. Lower shaft plug means 19, not
described in detail, is inserted in the bottom of the shaft bore to
prevent the escape of internal fluid pressure.
Shaft seal 21 prevents the escape of internal fluid pressure at the top of
valve 10. Actuator 22, not shown in detail, is employed to rotate the
valve between open and closed position.
FIG. 2 shows, in enlargement, the zone or cooperation between resilient
seat 15 and disc 13 in a first embodiment of the invention.
Seat 15 has an inclined lip portion 30 configured to sealingly cooperate
with disc sealing surface 31. The dimensions of seat 15 are such that an
interference fit exists between seat and disc to enhance sealing
effectiveness. Annular seat 15 further includes a narrowed linking portion
32 that connects lip portion 30 with heel portion 33.
Annular metal seat 34 is formed in a flat configuration and includes a
generally thickened central portion 35, an outer portion or support tang
36, and an inner, curved seat portion 37. Groove 38 is formed by facing
surfaces of valve housing 11 and insert 16, and annular metal seat 34 is
fixed in the housing by trapping outer support tang 36 in groove 38.
Insert 16 is attached to valve housing 11 by a plurality of bolts passing
through corresponding bolt holes 39 formed in insert 16.
Fusible washer 40 is interposed between thickened central portion 35 of
metal seat 34 and surface 41 of resilient seat 15. Metal seat 34 is formed
flat so that outer support tang 36 is a planar extension of thickened
central portion 35. Upon assembly, tang 36 is trapped in groove 38, but
because of the presence of fusible washer 40, metal seat 34 is formed into
a Belleville shape. Seating portion 37 of metal seat 34 is thus normally
held out of contact from disc sealing surface 31, yet the spring force of
the metal seat exerts enough force through washer 40 to clamp that portion
of surface 41 that is contacted by the washer. Thus resilient seat 15 is
held in place in the valve by being clamped between fusible washer 40 and
the valve housing 11.
A fulcrum 43, formed as an integral part of valve housing 11, projects into
resilient seat groove 42. The radially inner most edge 44 of fusible
washer 40 acts as a second fulcrum on the other side of seat 15. The
radial spacing of valve housing fulcrum 43 and washer fulcrum 44 are
controlled in the manner disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No.
3,608,861 to ensure that the line pressure may be employed to enhance the
disc and seat sealing effectiveness regardless of the direction from which
pressure is applied. Briefly described, when the valve is closed and when
pressure is from the left side of FIG. 2, the disc is designed to displace
a given amount to the right. Lip 30 of seat 15 will tend to displace a
greater amount to the right since it is relatively free to flex about
fulcrum 43. The pressure in the line thus enhances the already existing
interference fit between the disc and seat. When pressure is applied from
the right side of FIG. 2, the displacement of disc 13, although to the
left, is essentially of the same magnitude as the disc displacement was to
the right, but lip 30 of seat 15 tends to displace less than the
displacement of the disc. This is due to the radial placement of fulcrum
44 which is radially inward of fulcrum 43. Fulcrum 44 restrains a greater
portion of linking portion 32 of seat 15 than does fulcrum 43, with an
attendant greater resistance to flexure. Once again, the pressure in the
line enhances the already existing interference fit between the disc and
seat.
Fusible washer 40 should be made of a material having a lower destruction
temperature than the resilient seat 15 so that exposure of the valve to
fire will allow the washer to destruct before the resilient seat. When the
washer is destroyed the metal seat 34 is flexed or biased, by virtue of
its Belleville shape, toward the disc so that seating portion 37 comes
into contact with disc sealing surface 31, thereby establishing a
secondary, metal-to-metal, fire resistant seal.
In a second embodiment of the invention, illustrated in FIG. 3, an integral
protrusion 45 is formed on the linking portion 32 of resilient seat 15.
This protrusion replaces fusible washer 40 and, in normal operation, holds
metal seat 34 out of contact with disc sealing surface 31. When this valve
is exposed to fire, the resilient seat and its integral projection begin
to melt and deform. As this deformation occurs, the metal seat 34 flexes
into contact with the disc and establishes a secondary, metal-to-metal,
fire resistant seal.
Examples of materials for the various components of this valve may be
stainless steel, monel, or like metal for annular metal seat 34,
polytetrafluoroethylene for resilient seat 15, and nylon, polyethylene,
polyvinylidene fluoride, chlorotrifluroethylene, or fluorinated
ethylenepropylene-polymer for fusible washer 40, depending on temperature
and corrosive requirements of the application.
Obviously, many modifications and variations of the present invention are
possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood
that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be
practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.
* * * * *
|
|
|
|
|
Description  |
|