|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed is:
1. A communications loop testing arrangement comprising an impedance
measuring means (214) for measuring the impedance of a connected load;
characterized in that
said impedance measuring means is adapted to generate an impedance signal
having an amplitude representative of the real part of the impedance of
said connected load, and said loop testing arrangement further comprises a
reference signal source (304) for providing a reference signal having a
reference amplitude and comparator means (320) for comparing said
impedance signal to said reference signal and for generating an output
signal, whereby said output signal indicates a nonloaded loop if the real
part of the impedance of a connected loop is less than a reference value
and indicates a loaded loop if the real part of the impedance of a
connected loop is greater than the reference value.
2. The arrangement in accordance with claim 1 characterized in that said
impedance measuring means comprises:
generator means (203, 204) and applying said excitation signal to said
connected load for generating an excitation signal; and
filter means (205) connected to said generator means and to said connected
load for generating an output signal representative of the amplitude and
phase of the response signal which results from applying said excitation
signal to said connected load, said generator means being responsive to
the output signal of said filter means for generating said excitation
signal in phase with the output signal of said filter means, whereby an
oscillatory feedback loop is formed.
3. The arrangement in accordance with claim 2 characterized in that said
generator means comprises a voltage controlled current source (204).
4. The arrangement in accordance with claim 2 characterized in that said
filter means comprises a two pole bandpass filter.
5. The arrangement in accordance with claim 2 characterized in that said
generator means comprises a comparator circuit for comparing the output
signal of said filter means to a fixed potential.
6. The arrangement in accordance with claim 2 characterized in that said
impedance measuring means further comprises a transformer circuit (206)
for coupling said excitation signal to said connected load.
7. The arrangement in accordance with claim 1 characterized in that said
reference signal source comprises a capacitor (304) and said arrangement
further comprises reference means (207, 208, 209, 302, 305, 306, 307, 308,
310, 318) responsive to the output signal of said comparator means for
adjusting the amplitude of said reference signal, whereby said loop
testing arrangement is self-calibrating.
8. The arrangement in accordance with claim 7 characterized in that said
reference means comprises:
a reference impedance (209);
connector means (318, 207, 208) for switchably connecting said reference
impedance to said impedance measuring means; and
generator means (302, 305, 306, 307, 308, 310) for generating said
reference signal in response to the output signal of said comparator means
while said reference impedance is connected to said impedance measuring
means.
9. The arrangement in accordance with claim 8 characterized in that said
generator means comprises:
charging means (302, 305, 306) responsive to a start signal for charging
said capacitor;
discharging means (308, 310) responsive to a stop signal for discharging
said capacitor; and
control means (307) responsive to the output signal of said comparator
means for generating said stop signal.
10. The arrangement in accordance with claim 9 characterized in that said
connector means is responsive to said control means to connect a loop to
said impedance measuring means and to disconnect said reference impedance
therefrom and said loop testing arrangement further comprises delay means
(323) for delaying a defined period of time before said impedance signal
generated in response to said loop is compared to the generated reference
signal, whereby transients introduced by the switched connection of said
unknown loop impedance have settled sufficiently to allow a reliable
comparison.
11. The arrangement in accordance with claim 10 characterized in that said
delay means comprises a counter circuit for counting periodially occurring
pulses. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application is related to the application of R. G. Sparber, Serial No.
019,367, entitled "Impedance/Admittance Measuring Circuit" which was filed
concurrently herewith and assigned to the assignee of the present
application.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to the identification of telephone customer loops as
loaded loops and nonloaded loops and, more particularly, to an arrangement
for electronically performing such customer loop identification. For this
application, a loaded loop is defined as a customer 2-wire metallic loop
into which lumped inductive loads have been connected to reduce the
effects of distributed loop capacitance in accordance with well-known
telephone loop design practices.
Until recently, local telephone switching offices generally switched
telephone messages as analog signals on 2-wire metallic switching paths.
Such analog local switching offices are nearly transparent to the
transmission of telephone messages and introduce minimal signal loss
(typically less than 0.5 db) across the switching network. Accordingly,
present transmission design practices only include an allowance for this
negligible cross office loss.
However, with the introduction of local digital switching, cross office
loss may no longer be negligible. The use of a digital switch, which is
inherently a 4-wire device, with existing analog transmission facilities
requires a 2-wire to 4-wire to 2-wire conversion. This conversion is
performed by hybrid circuits with their attendant stability problems. That
is, a signal injected into the forward transmission path can pass across
the hybrid and return to the starting point through the reverse
transmission path. The resulting return signals can cause reverberations
which make telephone messages sound distorted or give the voice signals a
hollow sound. If the return signals are sufficiently high, the circuit
goes into oscillation which is referred to as singing. The stability of
the hybrid circuits can be assured by increasing the loss around the
4-wire path through the digital switch. However, any increase in cross
office loss beyond that encountered in an analog switching office is in
conflict with existing transmission design practices and could result in
degradation of transmitted signals.
A well-known solution to the dilemma of providing low cross office loss
while preventing singing is to provide improved balance networks for the
hybrids. Improved balance networks provide better impedance balance at the
hybrids to reduce the return signals. It is further known that additional
singing margin can be gained by utilizing two different balance networks,
one for loaded loops and one for nonloaded loops. This separate treatment
for loaded loops and nonloaded loops is referred to as "loop segregation".
Local telephone switching offices maintain office records which identify
each of the customers' loops and indicate whether those loops are loaded
or nonloaded. By referring to the office records, loop segregation can be
performed by connecting the appropriate balance network in accordance with
the records. Unfortunately, office records are often inaccurate and out of
date. Additional error may be introduced by inaccurate use of the office
records and, as the office records are frequently updated, frequent
changes are required. Furthermore, a loop which is properly identified in
the office records but improperly designed may have the quality of service
degraded by applying the balance network indicated by the office records.
These problems lead to administrative headaches as well as introducing a
high probability of error in the treatment applied to the customer loops
served by a local switching system.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Our electronic loop identification circuit eliminates these problems by
allowing local telephone switching offices to electronically perform loop
identification. In accordance with our invention, each customer loop is
connected to an impedance measuring dircuit which generates an output
signal representative of the real part of the impedance of a connected
load. The output signal of the impedance measuring circuit is compared to
a reference signal. If the magnitude of the output signal is greater than
the reference signal, a loaded loop signal is generated; and, if the
magnitude of the output signal is less than the reference signal, a
nonloaded loop signal is generated.
The impedance measuring circuit comprises an excitation signal generator
and a two pole bandpass filter circuit connected together to form a
feedback loop such that the circuit oscillates at approximately the center
frequency of the filter circuit. The excitation signal is applied to a
load and the resulting response signal is passed through the filter. The
phase relations imposed by the feedback loop result in the magnitude of
the filter output signal being proportional to the real part of the
impedance of the load which is driven by the excitation signal. The
illustrative embodiment utilizes a voltage controlled current source as
the excitation signal generator, an active two pole bandpass filter, and a
comparator circuit to connect the two into a feedback loop.
The reference signal to which the filter output signal is compared is
generated by the loop identification circuit prior to each loop
identification operation. The generation of the reference signal prior to
each loop identification calibrates the loop identification circuit to
correct any variations in circuit components due to time and temperature
changes, and serves to avoid costly manufacturing techniques and high cost
components. The loop identification circuit initially connects a reference
load to the impedance measuring circuit. An initially fully charged
capacitor is discharged until a comparator circuit which compares the
charge on the capacitor to the output signal of the impedance measuring
circuit indicates that the two signals have intersected. At that time the
capacitor discharging is discontinued such that the potential on the
capacitor is equal to the desired reference voltage. The loop
identification circuit disconnects the reference load and connects a
customer loop to be identified. After a defined stabilizing time period
has elapsed, the output signal of the impedance measuring circuit is
compared to the reference voltage on the capacitor. The result of the
comparison is stored by a flip-flop circuit and a completion signal is
generated.
Analysis of data collected in a Bell System customer loop survey led to the
recognition that loop identification can be performed by measuring only
the real parts of the impedances of customer loops. Customer loops which
present an on-hook impedance at 3200 hz having a real part greater than
approximately 500 ohms were observed to be loaded while those having an
on-hook impedance with a lesser real part were observed to be
predominantly nonloaded loops.
Advantageously, the loop identification circuit can be connected in turn to
each of the customer loops connected to a switching office so that the
customer loops can be identified as loaded or nonloaded and treated
accordingly for loop segregation. Automatic identification by the loop
identification circuit of our invention eliminates the administrative
problems encountered when office records are relied upon for loop
segregation. Furthermore, by actually measuring the customers' loops, the
best selection of the two alternative balance networks can be made
regardless of inaccurate office records or improperly designed loops.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
The invention will be better understood from the following detailed
description when read with reference to the drawing in which:
FIG. 1 is an illustrative schematic diagram of a measuring circuit for
measuring the real and imaginary parts of impedances and admittances of a
connected load;
FIG. 2 is an illustrative schematic diagram of an impedance measuring
circuit which is used in a loop identification circuit and measures the
positive real part of the impedance of a connected load;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of one embodiment of circuitry used to
compare the output signal of the impedance measuring circuit of FIG. 2 to
a reference signal and for generating the reference signal; and
FIG. 4 is a composite drawing indicating how FIGS. 2 and 3 are arranged to
form a schematic diagram of an electronic loaded/nonloaded telephone loop
identification circuit.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an illustrative embodiment of a novel
impedance/admittance measuring circuit which can measure the real or
imaginary parts of the complex impedance or the complex admittance of a
connected load. The measuring circuit is a positive feedback oscillatory
loop comprising the comparator 101, the phase control circuit 102, the
load 103, the terminals 114 and 115 for connecting the load to the
measuring circuit, the operational amplifier (OP amp) 104, the resistors
110 and 111, the switch contact sets 112 and 113 of a function selection
switch, and the two pole bandpass filter 106 which comprises the inductor
107, the capacitor 108 and the resistor 109. The load 103 is selectively
connected by the switch contacts 112 and 113 as the input element or the
feedback element of the OP amp 104 for measuring admittances or
impedances, respectively. The function selection switch contacts are
represented as detached contacts. A cross or x on a conductor path
represents make or normally open contacts through which a path is
completed only when the switch is operated. A line perpendicularly drawn
across a conductor path represents break or normally closed contacts
through which a path is completed only when the switch is not operated. A
combination of make and break contacts is referred to as transfer contacts
which complete a path from a common contact to a make contact only when
the switch is operated and complete a path from the common contact to a
break contact only when the switch is not operated.
By setting the proper phase relation between the excitation signal V.sub.1
and the output voltage V.sub.0 via the phase control circuit 102, the
measuring circuit oscillates and the magnitude of the ouput voltage
V.sub.0 is proportional to the real or imaginary part of the impedance if
the function selection switch is operated or the admittance if the switch
is not operated, of the connected load 103. A variety of phase control
circuits are well known in the prior art as disclosed in Circuits for
Electronics Engineers edited by Samuel Weber, and published by McGraw-Hill
Incorporated in 1977, at page 278 et seq.
If the function selection switch comprising the contact sets 112 and 113 is
operated and the load 103 is represented by an impedance Z.sub.1, the
output voltage V.sub.0 is related to the excitation signal V.sub.1 by the
following general equation:
##EQU1##
Solving for Z.sub.1 yields:
##EQU2##
The phase relation between the output voltage V.sub.0 and the excitation
signal V.sub.1 determines whether the real part or the imaginary part of
an admittance or impedance is measured and whether the real part of
imaginary part which can be measured is positive or negative. For example,
if a zero phase shift is introduced by the phase control circuit 102 such
that the output voltage V.sub.0 and the excitation signal V.sub.1 are in
phase, the equation for the impedance Z.sub.1 becomes:
##EQU3##
For this phase relation, the output voltage V.sub.0 is proportional to the
real part of the impedance connected as the load 103 for impedances having
a negative real part. This is true regardless of the imaginary part of the
impedance. However, if a connected load impedance has a positive real
part, the circuit fails to oscillate and the output voltage V.sub.0 goes
to zero.
To measure the real part of an impedance having a positive real part, a 180
degree phase relation must be introduced between the output voltage
V.sub.0 and the excitation signal V.sub.1. For a 180 degree phase relation
between V.sub.0 and V.sub.1, V.sub.0 /V.sub.1 will be equal to minus the
magnitude of V.sub.0 /V.sub.1 which leads to the following equation for
the impedance Z.sub.1 :
##EQU4##
For a given value of V.sub.0, the plot of the impedances which will produce
that V.sub.0 is a straight line parallel to the imaginary axis and
crossing the real axis at a positive real part defined as R.sub.2 times
the magnitude of V.sub.0 /V.sub.1. Accordingly, V.sub.0 for this case is
proportional to the positive real part of the connected load impedance.
By making the phase relation of the excitation signal V.sub.1 to the output
voltage V.sub.0 +90 degrees or -90 degrees, the output voltage V.sub.0
becomes proportional to the positive imaginary part or the negative
imaginary part, respectively, of the impedance connected as the load 103.
For a positive 90 degree phase relation, V.sub.0 /V.sub.1 is equal to -j
times the magnitude of V.sub.0 /V.sub.1. The equation for the impedance
Z.sub.1 then becomes:
##EQU5##
For a given value of V.sub.0, the plot of the impedances which will
produce that V.sub.0 is a straight line parallel to the real axis and
crossing the imaginary axis at a positive imaginary part defined as
R.sub.2 times the magnitude of V.sub.0 /V.sub.1. Accordingly, V.sub.0 for
this case is proportional to the imaginary part of the impedance connected
as the load 103.
For a negative 90 degree phase relation, V.sub.0 is equal to j times the
magnitude of V.sub.0 /V.sub.1 and the equation for the impedance Z.sub.1
becomes the following:
##EQU6##
For a given value of V.sub.0, the plot of the impedances which will
produce that V.sub.0 is a straight line parallel to the real axis and
crossing the imaginary axis at a negative imaginary part defined as
-R.sub.2 times the magnitude of V.sub.0 /V.sub.1. Accordingly, V.sub.0 is
proportional to the negative imaginary part of an impedance connected as
the load 103.
If the real or imaginary parts of an admittance are to be measured, the
function selection switch is set to admittance or placed in the not
operated position. If the load is represented as Z.sub.2, the equation for
the admittance Y.sub.2, which is the reciprocal of the impedance Z.sub.2,
is as follows:
##EQU7##
For a zero phase relation between the output voltage V.sub.0 and the
excitation signal V.sub.1, the equation for the admittance Y.sub.2
becomes:
##EQU8##
For a given value of V.sub.0, the plot of all admittances which will
produce that V.sub.0 is a straight line parallel to the imaginary axis and
crossing the real axis at a negative real part defined as -1 times the
magnitude of V.sub.0 /V.sub.1 divided by R.sub.1. Accordingly, V.sub.0 is
proportional to the negative real part of an admittance connected as the
load 103.
If a phase relation of 180 degrees is imposed between the output voltage
V.sub.0 and the excitation signal V.sub.1, V.sub.0 will be proportional to
the positive real part of the admittance Y.sub.2. An analysis similar to
that performed above for an impedance measurement shows that a phase
relation of +90 degrees and -90 degrees between the excitation signal
V.sub.1 and the output voltage V.sub.0 will allow the measurement of a
positive imaginary part of an admittance and a negative imaginary part of
an admittance, respectively.
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of the impedance measuring circuit 214 for
measuring the real part of the impedance of a connected load. The
impedance measuring circuit 214 comprises the comparator 203, the current
source 204, the transformer 206, and the two pole bandpass filter 205. The
relay make contacts 207 and the relay transfer contacts 208 selectively
connect either the reference resistor 209 or a customer loop which is
connected to the tip and ring terminals 201 and 202.
A fixed amplitude square wave excitation signal generated by the current
generator 204 is coupled to a connected load via the transformer 206. The
signal resulting from applying the excitation signal to the connected load
is filtered by the two pole bandpass filter 205 resulting in the nearly
sinusoidal output voltage V.sub.0 which has a magnitude proportional to
the positive real part of the impedance of the connected load. The output
voltage V.sub.0 controls the comparator 203 to form an oscillatory
positive feedback loop for loads having a positive real part. The
comparator 203 in response to the output voltage V.sub.0 generates a fixed
amplitude square wave signal which controls the current source 204 and
serves as a clock signal for the circuitry shown in FIG. 3 as will be
described hereinafter.
The impedance measuring circuit 214 of FIG. 2 is an embodiment of the
generalized impedance/admittance measuring circuit of FIG. 1 which is set
up to measure the positive real part of the impedance of the load 103. The
correlation between the measuring circuits of FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 is most
easily observed by noting that the OP amp 104 and the resistor 110 form a
current source which drives the load 103 if the function selection switch
is operated. Further, the negative input terminal of the OP amp 104 is at
virtual ground such that one side of the load to be measured is
effectively at ground potential in both circuits. Finally, the phase
shifts around the feedback loop of the impedance measuring circuit 214
correspond to those of the circuit of FIG. 1 if the circuit of FIG. 1 is
set up to measure the positive real part of the impedance of the load 103.
A mathematical analysis similar to that previously performed relative to
FIG. 1 shows that the magnitude of the output voltage V.sub.0 of the
impedance measuring circuit 214 is proportional to the positive real part
of the impedance of a connected load.
The output of the comparator 203 is a square wave having a positive
amplitude approximately equal to the positive supply voltage of the
comparator 203 and a negative amplitude approximately equal to the
negative supply voltage of the comparator 203. The resistors 210 and 211
form a voltage divider to set the voltage level at the base terminal of
the transistor 212. If the output signal of the comparator 203 is high,
the transistor 212 is turned off. If the output signal of the comparator
203 is low, the transistor 212 is turned on and the current flow from the
collector terminal is equal to the supply voltage +V minus the
emitter-base voltage drop of the transistor 212, minus the base voltage of
the transistor 212, divided by the resistance value of the resistor 213,
and multiplied by the .alpha. of the transistor 212.
A two pole active filter which can be utilized in the impedance measuring
circuit of FIG. 2 is fully described in Burr Brown Operational Amplifiers
Design and Applications edited by Tobey, Graeme, and Huelsman, and
published by McGraw-Hill Incorporated in 1971, at page 293 et seq.
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of an illustrative embodiment of circuitry
for utilizing the impedance measuring circuit of FIG. 2 to identify loaded
loops and nonloaded loops. For this application, a loaded loop is defined
as a telephone customer 2-wire metallic loop into which lumped inductive
loads have been connected to reduce the effects of distributed loop
capacitance in accordance with well-known telephone loop design practices.
Prior to a loop identification operation, the signal on the start lead 301
is low which maintains the transistor 302 in its off state via the current
limiting resistor 303. While the transistor 302 is in its off state, the
capacitor 304 is charged through the diode 305 and the resistor 306 to
approximately the supply voltage +V. The flip-flop 307 is in its clear
state which maintains the transistor 308 in its off state via the current
limiting resistor 309 so that the capacitor 304 is not discharging via the
resistor 310 and the transistor 308.
The signal on the start lead 301 goes high to signal the start of a loop
identification operation. A high signal on the start lead 301 places the
transistor 302 into its on state which clamps the anode of the diode 305
to approximately ground potential to stop the charging of the capacitor
304 through the resistor 306 and the diode 305. The turn on of the
transistor 302 also triggers the monostable multivibrator or monopulser
311 which provides a short ground potential synchronizing pulse to clear
the flip-flop 312 and the flip-flop 313 and to set the flip-flop 307.
Setting the flip-flop 307 places the transistor 308 into its on state which
starts to discharge the capacitor 304 through the resistor 310 and the
transistor 308. The Q output signal from the flip-flop 307 is low so that
the transistor 314 is in an off state via the AND gate 315 and the current
limiting resistor 317. Accordingly, the relay coil 318 is de-energized.
The relay contacts 207 and 208 shown in FIG. 2 are controlled by the relay
coil 318. With the relay coil 318 de-energized, the reference resistor 209
is connected to the impedance measuring circuit via the relay contacts
208.
The impedance measuring circuit 214 of FIG. 2 provides an output voltage
V.sub.0 having a magnitude which is proportional to the real part of the
connected impedance, in this case, proportional to the resistance value,
463 ohms for the loop identification circuit, of the reference resistor
209. The sinusoidal voltage V.sub.0 is compared to the voltage on the
capacitor 304 by the comparator 320. A high signal is applied to the
strobe input S of the comparator 320 to enable the output signal of the
comparator 320. The high signal on the strobe input S of the comparator
320 is provided by the low signal on the Q output of the flip-flop 307 and
the NAND gate 322.
The low signal on the Q output of the flip-flop 307 and the low signal from
the counter circuit 323 force the output signals of the NAND gates 322 and
325 and the inverter 324 to be high. The voltage on the capacitor 304 is
initially greater than the peak magnitude of the V.sub.0 signal.
Accordingly, the output signal of the comparator 320 is low and the output
of the inverter 326 is high. Due to the discharge through the resistor 310
and the transistor 308, the voltage on the capacitor 304 decreases
gradually relative to the period of oscillation of the impedance measuring
circuit 214, which is approximately 3200 hz for the loop identification
circuit. Eventually the voltage on the capacitor 304 crosses at or near a
peak of the V.sub.0 signal and the output signal of the comparator 320
goes high. A high output signal from the comparator 320 forces the output
signal of the inverter 326 to go low which clears the flip-flop 307. A
high signal on the Q output of the flip-flop 307 clamps the output signal
of the comparator 320 low via the NAND gate 322 and energizes the relay
coil 318 through the AND gate 315, the current limiting resistor 317 and
the transistor 314.
Energizing the relay coil 318 operates the relay contacts 207 and 208 shown
in FIG. 2 to connect the unknown loop impedance connected to the terminals
201 and 202 to the impedance measuring circuit 214 of FIG. 2 and to
disconnect the reference resistor 209 therefrom. Clearing the flip-flop
307 also removes the hard clear on the binary counter 323 and it begins to
count clock pulses generated by the impedance measuring circuit of FIG. 2.
The low signal on the Q output of the flip-flop 307 turns off the
transistor 308 to stop the discharge of the capacitor 304 so that the
voltage on the capacitor 304 is representative of the real part of the
reference resistor 209 which was connected across the impedance measuring
circuit 214, i.e., the reference resistor 209 itself. After counting 64
clock pulses, the carry output signal on the counter 323 goes high to
unclamp the output of the comparator 320 through the inverter 324 and the
NAND gate 322. The counter 323 counting to 64 provides a time period
during which the transient signals associated with switching the loads
connected to the impedance measuring circuit can settle down. After this
delay period, the output voltage V.sub.0 of the impedance measuring
circuit can be reliably compared to the reference voltage on the capacitor
304. Strobing the output signal from the comparator 320 with the carry
output signal from the counter circuit 323 also serves to reduce the noise
susceptibility of the loop identification circuit.
If the peak value of the output voltage V.sub.0 is less than the reference
voltage on the capacitor 304, the output signal of the comparator 320 is
low and the flip-flop 313 remains in its cleared state so that its Q
output signal is low. If the peak value of the output voltage V.sub.0 is
greater than the reference voltage on the capacitor 304, the output signal
of the comparator 320 is high during the portion of the V.sub.0 waveform
which exceeds the reference voltage and the flip-flop 313 is set so that
its Q output signal is high. The next clock pulse counted by the counter
circuit 323 causes the output signal of the counter circuit 323 to go low
which clocks the flip-flop 312 and places it into its set state so that
its Q output signal is high indicating that the comparison is complete and
that the result is indicated by the signal on the Q output of the
flip-flop 313. When the start signal again goes low, the transistor 302 is
turned off so that the capacitor 304 can again charge to approximately the
supply voltage +V. The diode 329 serves to suppress high voltage noise
spikes which are generated when the current flow through the relay coil
318 is abruptly halted.
It is to be understood that the above described embodiment is merely
illustrative of the principles of the invention and that other
arrangements may be devised by those skilled in the art without departing
from the spirit and scope of the invention.
* * * * *
|
|
|
|
|
Description  |
|