WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Method and apparatus for diastolic pressure measurement    

Custom CD of patents similar to US4271843 : Method and apparatus for diastolic pressure measurement - $19.95
United States Patent4271843   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/4271843.html
Inventor(s)Flynn; George J. (16 Rolling La., Medfield, MA 02052)
AbstractThe rate of change in a selected portion of an arterial pressure pulse changes with applied constricting pressure, and the pattern of the change undergoes a progressive transition at a value of constricting pressure that is offset by a fixed amount below the true diastolic value. Diastolic pressure measurement based on this transition examines the rate of change of the arterial pressure pulse as the constricting pressure changes over a range of sub-diastolic values, determines the occurrence of the transition, and identifies the applied pressure at which the transition occurs. The offset pressure is added to the determined value of applied pressure to yield the desired measure of diastolic pressure.
   














 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History
Drawing from US Patent 4271843
Method and apparatus for diastolic pressure measurement - US Patent 4271843 Drawing
Method and apparatus for diastolic pressure measurement
Inventor     Flynn; George J. (16 Rolling La., Medfield, MA 02052)
Owner/Assignee    
Patent assignment
All assignments
Company News
Publication Date     June 9, 1981
Application Number     05/949,674
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     October 10, 1978
US Classification     600/494
Int'l Classification     A61B 005/02
Examiner     Michell; Robert W.
Assistant Examiner     Jaworski; Francis J.
Attorney/Law Firm     Kenway & Jenney
Address
Parent Case    
Priority Data    
USPTO Field of Search     128/667 128/679 128/680 128/681 128/682 128/683 128/684
Patent Tags     diastolic pressure measurement
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
3412729



[0 after 0 votes]
3527197



[0 after 0 votes]
3885551



[0 after 0 votes]
3903872



[0 after 0 votes]
4154238
Link
600/494
May,1979

[0 after 0 votes]
4105021
Williams
600/496
Aug,1978

[0 after 0 votes]
4074711
Link
600/494
Feb,1978

[0 after 0 votes]
4058117
Kaspari
600/495
Nov,1977

[0 after 0 votes]
4011860
Lee
600/496
Mar,1977

[0 after 0 votes]
4009709
Link
600/494
Mar,1977

[0 after 0 votes]
3939824
Arneson
600/485
Feb,1976

[0 after 0 votes]
3905354
Lichowsky
600/494
Sep,1975

[0 after 0 votes]
3552381
Burns
220/592.06
Jan,1971

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B

[0 market size comments]
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%

[0 market share comments]
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%

[0 reasonable royalty comments]
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

[0 Guesstimation of Royalty Value Comments]
License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
[0 license availability comments]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
[0 owner/assignee comments]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

[0 competitive advantage comments]
Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

[0 commercial alternatives comments]
 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


Having described the invention, what is claimed as new and secured by Letters Patent is:

1. A method for measuring diastolic pressure of a subject comprising the steps of

A. sensing arterial pressure signals with a pressure transducer applied non-intrusively to the subject's body,

B. applying arterially-constricting pressure to the artery being sensed and changing the applied pressure value over a range of at least sub-diastolic values,

C. determining the minimum sub-diastolic value of applied pressure at which the rate of change of the portion of sensed signal corresponding to left ventricle ejection undergoes a progressive change in response to monodirectionally-changing applied pressure, and

D. producing a value indicative of diastolic pressure for the subject in response to said determined value of sub-diastolic applied pressure for that subject.

2. A method according to claim 1 in which said value-producing step includes the step of adding a subject-independent pressure value to said determined value of applied pressure.

3. A method according to claim 1 in which said determining step comprises the steps of

A. producing a measure of the rate of change of the portion of sensed signal corresponding to left ventricle ejection, for each of a succession of arterial pressure pulses sensed at different applied pressures,

B. producing a representation of the graph of said measures for said successive signals as a function of applied pressure,

C. identifying a progressive change in the slope of said graphical representation, and

D. identifying the applied pressure at which said progressive change occurs.

4. A method according to claim 3 in which said step of producing said measure of rate of change includes the step of filtering each sensed pressure signal for removing selected low frequency components thereof.

5. A method according to claim 3 in which said step of producing said measure of rate of change includes differentiating each sensed pressure signal as a function of time and thereby providing a derivative signal providing said measure of rate of change.

6. A method according to claim 3 including the further steps of storing information identifying each measure of rate of change and storing information identifying the corresponding value of applied pressure.

7. A method according to claim 3 in which said step of producing said measure of rate of change includes verifying each measure of rate of change signal by testing the duration thereof.

8. A method according to claim 1 in which said pressure-applying step includes

A. changing the applied pressure monodirectionally over said range of sub-diastolic values, and

B. extending said range above and below a pressure value below the expected diastolic value by an offset amount of substantially 26 millimeters of mercury for monodirectionally-increasing applied pressure, and of substantially 16 millimeters of mercury for monodirectionally-decreasing applied pressure.

9. A method according to claim 1 in which said determining step includes

A. sensing plural pressure signals at different sub-diastolic values of applied pressure,

B. producing for each sensed pressure signal a signal having a parameter which is a measure of the rate of change of the portion of the sensed signal corresponding to left ventrical ejection, and

C. determining said progressive change as a progressive change in said signal parameter as a function of applied pressure.

10. A method according to claim 1 in which said determining step includes

A. sensing plural pressure signals at different sub-diastolic values of applied pressure,

B. producing, for each sensed arterial pressure signal, a measure of the rate of change of the portion of sensed signal corresponding to left ventricle ejection,

C. producing a graphical representation of the slope of said rate of change measures as a function of applied pressure,

D. determining said progressive change as a progressive change in the slope of said graphical representation, and

E. identifying the value of applied pressure at which said change in slope occurs.

11. A method for measuring diastolic pressure of a subject with the steps of

(i) sensing arterial pressure signals with a pressure transducer applied non-intrusively to the subject's body, and

(ii) applying arterially-constricting pressure to the artery being sensed and changing the applied pressure monodirectionally over a selected range,

said method comprising the further steps of

A. identifying the occurrence of a progressive change in the rate of change of the portion of sensed signal corresponding to left ventricle ejection at a value of applied pressure between 20 millimeters of mercury and 125 millimeters of mercury, and

B. determining the value of applied pressure at which said progressive change occurs, thereby to determine, at said value of applied pressure, a sub-diastolic pressure which is offset below the diastolic value of the subject by a known amount.

12. In apparatus for measuring diastolic pressure of a subject in response to arterial pressure signals sensed for each of a succession of arterial pulses under different values of applied arterially-constricting pressure, the combination comprising

A. means for changing the applied pressure over a range of sub-diastolic values,

B. means responsive to said sensed pressure signals and to said applied pressure for determining the minimum subdiastolic value of applied pressure at which the rate of change of the portion of sensed signal corresponding to left ventricle ejection undergoes a progressive change as a function of monodirectionally-changing applied pressure, and

C. means responsive to said determining means for producing a value indicative of diastolic pressure in response to said determined value of sub-diastolic applied pressure for that subject.

13. In apparatus according to claim 12, the further combination in which said value-producing means includes means for adding a known subject-independent pressure value to said determined applied pressure.

14. In apparatus according to claim 12, the further combination in which said means for determining comprises

A. means for producing a measure of rate of change of the portion of sensed signal corresponding to left ventricle ejection for each of a succession of arterial pressure signals sensed at different applied pressures,

B. means for producing a representation of a graph of said measures as a function of applied pressure,

C. means for identifying a progressive change in slope of the graphical representation in response to a monodirectionally-changing sub-diastolic applied pressure, and

D. means for identifying the value of applied pressure at which said progressive change occurred.

15. In apparatus according to claim 14, the further combination in which said means for producing a measure includes means for filtering each sensed pressure signal for removing selected low frequency components thereof.

16. In apparatus according to claim 14, the further combination in which said means for producing a measure includes means for differentiating each sensed pressure signal as a function of time and thereby producing a derivative signal providing said measure of rate of change.

17. In apparatus according to claim 14, the further combination of means for storing information identifying each measure of rate of change and means for storing information identifying the value of applied pressure corresponding with each such measure.

18. In apparatus according to claim 14, the further combination in which said means for producing a measure includes timing verification means for verifying each measure of rate of change signal by testing the duration thereof.

19. In apparatus according to claim 12, the further combination in which said pressure-changing means includes means for changing the applied pressure monodirectionally over a range of sub-diastolic pressure values extending above and below a pressure value below the expected diastolic value of the subject by an offset amount of approximately 26 millimeters of mercury for a monodirectionally increasing applied pressure and of substantially 16 millimeters of mercury for monodirectionally decreasing applied pressure.

20. In apparatus according to claim 12 the further combination in which said means responsive to signals includes

A. means for sensing plural pressure signals at different sub-diastolic values of applied pressure,

B. means for producing for each sensed pressure signal a signal having a parameter which is a measure of the rate of change of the portion of the sensed signal corresponding to left ventricle ejection, and

C. means for determining said progressive change as a progressive change in said signal parameter as a function of applied pressure.

21. In apparatus according to claim 12, the further combination in which said means responsive to sensed signals comprises

A. means for sensing plural pressure signals at different sub-diastolic values of applied pressure,

B. means for producing, for each sensed arterial pressure signal, a measure of the rate of change of the portion of sensed signal corresponding to left ventricle ejection,

C. means for producing a graphical representation of the slope of said rate of change measures as a function of applied pressure,

D. means for determining said progressive change as a progressive change in the slope of said graphical representation, and

E. means for identifying the value of applied pressure at which said change in slope occurs.

22. In apparatus for measuring diastolic pressure of a subject in response to arterial pressure signals sensed with a pressure transducer applied non-intrusively to the subject's body for each of a succession of arterial pulses produced under different values of applied arterially-constricting pressure and having means for applying arterially-constricting pressure to the artery being sensed and for changing the applied pressure monodirectionally over a selected range, the further combination comprising

A. means for identifying the occurrence of a progressive change in the rate of change of the portion of sensed signal corresponding to left ventricle ejection at a value of applied pressure between 20 millimeters of mercury and 125 millimeters of mercury, and

B. means for determining the applied pressure at which said identified progressive change occurs, thereby for determining a sub-diastolic pressure which is offset below the diastolic value of the subject by a known amount.
 Description Submit all comments and votes
 


BACKGROUND

This invention relates to a new measure of diastolic pressure. It provides a method and apparatus for diastolic pressure measurement characterized by accuracy, operator ease, and little patient discomfort. Further, the invention can be practiced with a variety of instrument configurations.

The accurate measurement of blood pressure is an important tool in preventive and recuperative cardiac care. The common sphygmomanometer employing a manually inflated pressure cuff and mercury manometer is accordingly well known. It is used with a stethoscope, with which the medical professional listens for different acoustic pulses, termed Korotkoff sounds.

The prior art regarding the accurate measurement of blood pressure also includes the disclosures in the following U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,527,197; 3,552,381; 3,903,872; 3,905,354; 3,939,824; 4,009,709; 4,058,117; and 4,074,711. Problems with these and other prior sphygmomanometers include operator difficulty in perceiving important changes in Korotkoff sounds and in distinguishing Korotkoff sounds from motion artifacts and other background noise. Also, the common sphygmomanometer first occludes the subject's artery to measure systolic pressure, which can cause sufficient discomfort so that the subsequent measurement of diastolic pressure is not accurate. Electronic techniques for measuring blood pressure also have shortcomings stemming from the difficulty in detecting and identifying pressure pulses properly. These problems are particularly persistent in measuring diastolic pressure, rather than in measuring more readily discernible systolic value.

It is accordingly an object of this invention to provide an improved method and apparatus for measuring diastolic pressure. More particularly, it is an object to provide a diastolic pressure measuring method and apparatus free of problems heretofore encountered in distinguishing Korotkoff sounds of interest from other signals. Accordingly, the objects of the invention include providing such a method and apparatus which are accurate and easy to use without error.

It is a further object of the invention to provide a method and apparatus for the non-intrusive measurement of diastolic pressure which subjects the patient to little discomfort, and which can readily be automated.

It is also an object of the invention to provide a diastolic pressure measuring method and apparatus which can readily be practiced without requiring sound perception by the operator. This both avoids a potential source of error and overcomes one possible source of concern for the patient, as contrasted with prior devices which require the operator to listen carefully for significant sound characteristics.

Other objects of the invention will in part be obvious and will in part appear hereinafter.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The arterial pressure pulse monitored with a conventional sphygmomanometer is known to have a leading side portion correlated to left ventricle ejection and which manifests the fastest rate of pressure change of any portion of the pulse. The rate of change in this fast pulse portion changes with the constricting pressure which a cuff applies, and it has been found that the pattern of the change undergoes a progressive transition at a value of applied cuff pressure that is offset by a fixed amount below the true diastolic value.

The measurement of diastolic pressure according to the invention thus involves determining the applied cuff pessure at which a selected time-dependent function of the pressure pulse monitored in a conventional sphygmomanometer undergoes a unique change in progressive character when examined as a function of the applied cuff pressure. The change is denoted as being progressive to distinguish from a reversal in character. The function of the pressure pulse that manifests the transition of interest is one which measures the rate of change of the rapidly-changed pressure pulse portion which correlates to left ventricle ejection. The desired signal information for practice of the invention accordingly can be produced, by way of example, by separating it from the pressure pulse with a high pass filter, or by differentiating the pressure pulse as a function of time.

The invention thus stems from the finding that the fast portion of the conventionally-monitored pressure pulse manifests a unique progressive change as the applied constricting pressure changes over a sub-diastolic range. Further, the value of the applied pressure at which the change occurs is a substantially constant amount below the true diastolic pressure of the subject.

One practice of the invention thus involves applying a conventional pressure cuff, fitted with a pressure sensor to the patient, and progressively increasing the cuff pressure. The fast signal portion which correlates to left ventricle ejection is separated from the sensed pressure pulse by means of a high pass filter, and the amplitude of the resultant rate-of-change signal is monitored. The rate-of-change signal, which repeats with each cardiac pulse, exhibits little if any increase in amplitude as the cuff pressure is initially increased. However, with continued increase in cuff pressure below the diastolic value of the patient, the monitored signal begins to increase significantly more rapidly. The cuff pressure at which this transition occurs has a subject-independent and substantially constant value below the true diastolic pressure for the patient. Adding this constant offset pressure value to the measured value this yields the desired diastolic measurement.

The signal transition of interest can be determined with any of several pattern recognition techniques. In one illustrative instance, peak detecting equipment senses when the monitored waveform of interest changes relative to preceding pulses by more than a selected threshold amount. The peak detecting equipment preferably stores and compares a number of rate-of-change pulses to increase the accuracy of the determination.

In another instance, the pattern recognition is carried out with a recorder that records both the repeating pulses and the applied cuff pressure, as functions of time. The peaks of successive pulses define a curve which has a significant and readily apparent change in slope at the transition of interest. In particular, at cuff pressures below the value which coincides with the selected transition, the pulse peaks lie along a relatively straight line of small slope, and at pressures above the transition the pulse peaks define a second line of significantly greater slope. The applied cuff pressure of interest is the value which coincides with the intersection of the two slopes. The diastolic pressure of the subject is greater than this identified value by the known pressure offset.

Alternative to operating with an increasing applied pressure, the invention can be practiced by determining the transition of the rate-of-change pulses with progressively decreasing constricting pressure, from a value typically above the expected diastolic value to well below it. In this practice of the invention, the monitored pulses again manifest a progressive transition at a value of cuff pressure which is offset by a fixed value below the diastolic value, but the offset is smaller from that encountered with an increasing constricting pressure. In particular, the offset for measurements made with increasing cuff pressure is in the order of 26 or 27 millimeters of mercury, whereas the offset with decreasing cuff pressure is in the order of 16 to 17 millimeters of mercury. The values of offset pressure discussed herein are in reference to the value of diastolic pressure as determined with a stethoscope.

An instrument employing the invention can provide many advantages, some inherent and other optional but readily provided. The instrument operates without the operator listening to Korotkoff sounds and accordingly is free of acoustic preception problems, both by the operator and by the equipment. The instrument operates readily with patients that do not exhibit the classical Phase IV Korotkoff sounds, or no discernible Phase V. It is readily arranged to provide accurate measurements and analysis of physical conditions, such as pulses alternans, which complicate the conventional occluding cuff/stethoscope sphygmomanometer technique. The instrument also has a relatively high degree of freedom from errors due to background noise, including motion artifacts. Another advantage is a high degree of freedom from variability in pulse waveform frequencies and pressure pulse amplitudes between different subjects, i.e. in variations from subject to subject. Moreover, the instrument readily provides a high and reliable degree of accuracy that stems from analysis of a series of cardiac pressure pulses, rather than on single pulse transitions. Another advantage is that the instrument provides an accurate diastolic measurement quickly, and without first occluding the artery; this minimizes patient discomfort and concern. The instrument moreover can readily be provided in a form suitable for continuous pressure measuring, or monitoring, without occluding the artery and hence with minimal discomfort and with diminished danger of impairing mobility.

The invention accordingly comprises the several steps and the relation of one or more of such steps with respect to each of the others, and the apparatus embodying features of construction, combinations and arrangement of parts adapted to effect such steps, all as exemplified in the following detailed disclosure, the scope of the invention is indicated in the claims .

For a fuller understanding of the nature, objects and advantages of the invention, reference should be made to the following detailed description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a plot of a sensed cardiac pressure pulse, and of a selected rate of change waveform produced from the pressure pulse for practice of the invention;

FIGS. 2 and 3 are graphs of waveforms depicting the practice of the invention;

FIG. 4 is a functional schematic representation of an instrument according to the invention;

FIGS. 5 and 6 are block schematic representations of instruments for practicing the invention; and

FIG. 7 is a block schematic representation of a further instrument for practicing the invention.

DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATED EMBODIMENTS

A pressure pulse detected from an unconstricted systemic artery with a conventional arrangement of an acoustic sensor applied non-intrusively, as under a pressure cuff, has a waveform 10 of the type which FIG. 1 shows. The portion 10a of the pulse having the fastest rise time is the leading edge portion, denoted between the times A and B, which has been correlated to the left ventricle ejection time.

The rate of pressure change in the fast pulse portion 10a changes with constriction of the artery being monitored and accordingly changes with the pressure being applied to the artery by a typical sphygmomanometer cuff. Moreover, it has been found that the pattern of the change undergoes a progressive transition at a value of applied cuff pressure that is offset by an essentially fixed amount below the true diastolic value of the patient.

The invention contemplates measuring the applied cuff pressure at which the transition occurs. To this end, the fast pulse portion 10a is essentially separated from the overall pressure pulse, as can be done with any of numerous rate-of-change detectors. For example, FIG. 1 shows the separated pulse 12 that results from applying the waveform 10 to a high pass filter. The duration of the leading edge of the separated pulse 12 corresponds with the duration of the pulse portion 10a, as the time markers A and B designate. The amplitude of the rate-of-change pulse 12 is a function of the rate of change which occurs in the waveform portion 10a between the times A and B.

The FIG. 1 wavefom 10 and rate-of-change pulse 12 repeat with every cardiac beat. As one increases the pressure in a constricting cuff at a uniform rate at sub-diastolic values, the resultant series of rate-of-change pulses, after separation from the applied cuff pressure on which it is superposed, has a waveform of the type which FIG. 2 shows. The pulses 12 are seen to have essentially the same or only slightly increasing amplitudes for increasing pressure at low values, as denoted with an initial series of pulses P1, P2, P3, P4 and P5, which respectively have relative values V1, V2 . . . V5. A curve 14 defined by the peaks of these initial pulses appears essentially as a straight line having a small slope, of value S1. However, at higher pressure values, the rate-of-change pulses 12 increase in amplitude significantly more rapidly, as shown for the succeeding series of pulses P6, P7 etc., which have progressively increasing values V6, V7 . . . . A curve 16 defined by the peaks of the latter pulses is again substantially a straight line, under at least idealized conditions, but with a slope S2 significantly greater than slope S1.

The transition between the two series of pulses is the point x (pt x) denoted by the intersection of the two slope curves 14 and 16. It occurs at a cuff pressure designated Px, and it has been found that this pressure has a relatively predictable constant value below the true diastolic pressure of the subject. The amount of the offset below the diastolic value has been found statistically to have a value of 26 or 27 millimeters mercury. This offset is consistent not only for any given subject but also from subject to subject. Accordingly, adding the value of this offset to the measured pressure value Px yields the true diastolic pressure of the subject. It should, however, be understood that the diastolic pressure measured with the conventional stethoscope technique evades precise measurement due to human perception factors, variations in procedure, and instrument imprecision.

FIG. 3 is a waveform of rate-of-change pulses 12 produced in the same manner as the waveform of FIG. 2, but for progressively decreasing pressure, again over a sub-diastolic range. The waveform of FIG. 3 is thus in many ways a mirror image, about the y-axis, of the FIG. 2 waveform, except that the offset pressure is different. The pulses 12 produced with progressively decreasing pressure initially decrease in amplitude to define a curve 18 of slope S3. There is a transition in the monitored pulses, however, and at pressures below it the pulses decrease in value at a significantly slower rate to define a peak-following curve 20 of slope S4. The point y (pt y) defined by the intersection of the curves 18 and 20 occurs at a value of applied cuff pressure designated Py, and this pressure again has a predictable and constant value below the true diastolic pressure of the subject. However, in this instance of decreasing cuff pressure, the statistically determined offset is 16 or 17 millimeters mercury. Hence adding this offset to the measured pressure Py yields an accurate measure of the patient's diastolic pressure.

With further refernce to FIGS. 2 and 3, the depicted diastolic measuring technique can for example be practiced with a controlled rate of cuff pressure change of two millimeters mercury per second. In this instance a nominal pulse rate of one beat per second readily yields within a half-minute a series of pulses for calculating the true diastolic pressure with significant accuracy and low error. Further, these procedures enable the pressure measurement to be made without the discomfort of occluding the systemic artery, as occurs with prior art techniques. Further, an instrument for practicing the measuring technique of FIGS. 2 and 3 can be initialized to an initial cuff pressure, and thereby further reduce patient discomfort and measuring time. For example the slope-intersection determination in FIG. 2 can reliably be made with ten or fewer pressure pulses to define the curve 14 of slope S1. Hence the instrument can initialize the pressure cuff to a starting pressure level of roughly 20 millimeters mercury below the point x which, combined with the offset pressure 26-27 millimeters means that the instrument can safely be preset to a starting pressure of some 45 millimeters mercury below the nominal value of the diastolic pressure being measured.

It should further be noted that an instrument operating in accordance with the invention can detect the condition known as the aortic regurgitation, or the lack of Phase V Korotkoff sounds, a condition which is difficult to detect with prior techniques. The diastolic pressure-measuring waveforms which FIGS. 2 and 3 show, however, can readily be obtained from subjects having this condition.

FIG. 4 shows that a diastolic pressure-measuring instrument 21 embodying the invention has a pressure cuff 22 which a pressure source 24 selectively inflates. The pressure cuff and the pressure source can employ known constructions. A pressure meter 26 is connected with the pressure cuff to display or otherwise manifest the constricting pressure which the cuff applies to the subject's arm or other limb at which the pressure is being measured. Also connected with the pressure cuff is a transducer 28 for receiving the sensed arterial pressure waveforms 10 shown in FIG. 1 and for converting them to electrical signals.

A rate of change detector 30 receives the resultant signals and, in response, produces signals, e.g. the FIG. 1 pulse 12, responsive to the rate of change of the FIG. 1 waveform portion 10a. More particularly, the detector 30 produces, for each cardiac beat, a pulse or other signal set having a parameter which is a measure of the time rate of change of the cardiac beat fast portion. The rate of change detector accordingly can, by way of illustrative examples, be a filter or a differentiating circuit. As a further alternative, it can be a metering circuit triggered by the onset of the rapid waveform portion and disabled by the termination thereof.

A pattern recognition element 32 receives the rate-of-change signals from the detector 30, and determines the occurrence of the transition point for those signals, e.g. the slope transition designated in FIG. 2 as point x and in FIG. 3 as point y. The element 32 typically is connected with the pressure meter 26, as designated with the broken line, to display, record or otherwise manifest the value of applied cuff pressure at the time when the element 32 determines the transition has occurred. This value is the FIG. 3 pressure Px, or the FIG. 4 pressure Py, whichever is applicable. The appropriate offset pressure is then added to the determined value of transition pressure, preferably automatically as by the display unit, to yield the true diastolic pressure of the subject.

FIG. 5 shows one specific preferred form of the FIG. 4 instrument 21. Elements of FIG. 5 which correspond to those in FIG. 4 have the same reference numeral with an additional superscript prime. In addition to a pressure cuff 22' connected with a pressure source 24' and a pneumatic-to-electrical transducer 28', the FIG. 5 instrument has a display unit 36 connected with the pressure meter 26' for selectively displaying the measured value of applied cuff pressure; the display typically is in digital format and calibrated in millimeters of mercury. A high pass filter 38 receives the electrical signals from the transducer 28', and in turn is connected to a peak detector 40.

The high pass filter 38 provides the function of the FIG. 4 rate-of-change detector 30, and the peak detector 40 provides the function of FIG. 4 pattern recognition element 32. More particularly, the diastolic pressure measuring instrument of FIG. 5 develops, with the high pass filter 38, a pulse 12 of the type described above with reference to FIG. 1 in response to each sensed arterial pressure waveform 10 as shown in FIG. 1, and accordingly applies to the peak detector 40 a series of pulses as shown for example in FIG. 2. The filter 38 and the detector 40, as well as the display unit 36, can employ any of numerous constructions within the skill of those practiced in the art. The filter blocks low frequency signal components while passing those that identify the rate of change of the FIG. 1 waveform portion 10a. Typically the high-pass filter characteristic has a three db point at about 12 to 14 Hertz. Where desired, a series low pass filter can be added, with a three db point at approximately 50 Hertz to block noise at frequencies above the range of interest.

The illustrated peak detector 40 determines the transition point by comparing rate-of-change pulses from the filter. In an elementary construction with a pressure source 24' of increasing applied pressure, the detector identifies the transition point simply in response to a rate-of-change pulse with an amplitude that exceeds the preceding pulse by a threshold amount. It is preferable that the comparison be made against the average of several prior pulses, for example the average value of the pulses P1 to P2 of FIG. 2. It is also preferable that the detector identify the transition point in response to a determination that not only one but several successive pulses exceed a stored pre-transition pulse value. Thus, in this embodiment the peak detector 40 initially produces an average pre-transition pulse value and updates that value upon sensing each successive pulse having an amplitude within a selected range relative to the average value. Upon sensing a pulse that differs from the average value by a selected relative amount, the detector disables the updating function, holds the average value determined at that point and compares succeeding pulses with the stored average value. Upon determining that each of a selected number of successive pulses, for example three or more, exceeds the average pulse value by a threshold amount, the peak detector produces a signal indicating that the transition point has indeed been detected. This signal actuates the display unit 36 to manifest the value of applied cuff pressure at the time when the peak detector detected the first of the succession of pulses exceeding the average value by the selected amount. In one preferred embodiment of this type, the peak detector 40 rejects potentially erroneous pulses by updating the average pre-transition pulse value only with pulses that do not depart from the value by a relatively small proportional amount, and identifying as post-transition pulses only those which exceed the stored average value by a larger proportional amount.

The threshold level(s) for the peak detector 40 are selected according to the nature of the detector. For example, a detector that simply compares two successive signals will generally have a different--usually larger--threshold than one which compares each new signal with an average of pre-transition signals. Similarly, a detector that responds only to positive results from repeated comparisons can be more sensitive and hence employ a smaller threshold than one which responds to a single positive result. Illustrative threshold values are typically between 10% and 20% of pre-transition signal, but these values are not exclusive of others.

The illustrated FIG. 5 instrument also includes, as part of the FIG. 4 pulse recognition sensor 32, a timing circuit 42 that disables the peak detector from responding to signals having a duration outside of at least one selected limit. The timing circuit 42 thus limits response of the instrument to pulses having a duration within a selected time window. More particularly, the time interval between the times