|
Claims  |
|
|
I claim:
1. A refrigeration process comprising employing as a refrigerant the
composition comprising:
(a) a first hydrocarbon,
(b) a first halocarbon, and
(c) a second hydrocarbon;
wherein the boiling point of (a) is less than the boiling point of (b);
wherein the boiling point of (b) is less than the boiling point of (c);
and wherein (b) is substantially nonflammable.
2. A process according to claim 1 wherein (b) is fluorocarbon.
3. A process according to claim 1 wherein neither the molecular weight of
(a) nor the molecular weight of (c) exceeds about 72.
4. A process according to claim 1 wherein said refrigerant further
comprises (d) a second halocarbon; wherein the boiling point of (c) is
less than the boiling point of (d); and wherein (d) is substantially
nonflammable.
5. A process according to claim 1 wherein said refrigerant further
comprises (d) a second halocarbon; wherein the boiling point of (d) is
less than the boiling point of (a); and wherein (d) is substantially
nonflammable.
6. A process according to claim 1 wherein said refrigerant further
comprises (d) a second halocarbon and (e) a third halocarbon; wherein the
boiling point of (c) is less than the boiling point of (d); wherein the
boiling point of (e) is less than the boiling point of (a); and wherein
(d) and (e) are substantially nonflammable.
7. A process according to claim 1 wherein (a) is propane, (b) is
dichlorodifluoromethane, and (c) is isobutane.
8. A process according to claim 7 wherein the amount of isobutane does not
exceed about 9 weight percent; wherein the amount of propane does not
exceed about 9 weight percent; wherein the total amount of isobutane and
propane does not exceed about 12 weight percent; and wherein said weight
percentages are based upon the total weight of (a), (b) and (c).
9. A process according to claim 7 wherein the amount of isobutane does not
exceed about 5 weight percent; wherein the amount of propane does not
exceed about 5 weight percent; wherein the total amount of isobutane and
propane does not exceed about 7 weight percent; and wherein said weight
percentages are based upon the total weight of (a), (b) and (c).
10. A process according to claim 1 wherein the amount of (a), in terms of
weight, is about 70 to about 130 percent of the amount of (c).
11. A process according to claim 10 wherein the total amount of (a) and (b)
does not exceed about 12 weight percent based upon the total weight of
(a), (b) and (c).
12. A process according to claim 10 wherein (a) is propane, (b) is
dichlorodifluoromethane, and (c) is isobutane.
13. A process according to claim 12 wherein the amount of propane, in terms
of weight, is about equal to the amount of isobutane.
14. A process according to claim 1 wherein neither the amount of (a) nor
the amount of (c) exceeds about 9 weight percent based upon the total
weight of (a), (b) and (c).
15. A process according to claim 1 wherein the total hydrocarbon content of
said refrigerant does not exceed about 12 weight percent based upon the
total weight of hydrocarbon and halocarbon in said refrigerant.
16. A process according to claim 4 wherein (a) is propane, (b) is
dichlorodifluoromethane, (c) is isobutane and (d) is
trichlorofluoromethane.
17. A process according to claim 4 wherein (a) is propane, (b) is
dichlorodifluoromethane, (c) is isobutane and (d) is
1,2-dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane.
18. A process according to claim 17 wherein the amount of (a) does not
exceed about 9 weight percent; wherein the amount of (c) does not exceed
about 9 weight percent; wherein the total amount of (a) and (c) does not
exceed about 12 weight percent; and wherein said weight percentages are
based upon the total weight of (a), (b), (c) and (d).
19. A process according to claim 4 wherein the amount of (d) does not
exceed about 20 percent by weight of (b).
20. A process according to claim 5 wherein the amount of (d) does not
exceed about 20 percent by weight of (b).
21. A process according to claim 6 wherein neither the amount of (d) nor
the amount of (e) exceeds about 20 percent by weight of (b).
22. A refrigeration process comprising employing as a refrigerant the
composition comprising:
(a) a first halocarbon,
(b) a first hydrocarbon, and
(c) a second halocarbon;
wherein the boiling point of (a) is less than the boiling point of (b);
wherein the boiling point of (b) is less than the boiling point of (c);
and wherein (a) and (c) are substantially nonflammable.
23. A process according to claim 22 wherein (a) is about 70 to about 130
percent by weight of (c).
24. A process according to claim 22 wherein the amount of (b) does not
exceed about 12 weight percent based upon the total weight of (a), (b) and
(c).
25. A process according to claim 22 wherein the total hydrocarbon content
of said refrigerant does not exceed about 12 weight percent based upon the
total weight of hydrocarbon and halocarbon in said refrigerant.
26. A composition comprising:
(a) a first hydrocarbon,
(b) a first halocarbon,
(c) a second hydrocarbon, and
(d) a second halocarbon;
wherein the boiling point of (a) is less than the boiling point of (b);
wherein the boiling point of (b) is less than the boiling point of (c);
wherein the boiling point of (c) is less than the boiling point of (d);
and wherein (b) and (d) are substantially nonflammable. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
This invention relates to refrigeration and refrigerants.
The art of refrigeration is a relatively mature art in that much is known
about it. The related technology has been successfully put into wide
commercial practice. Broadly, refrigeration can be described as the
utilization of physical change in a substance to produce a cooling effect.
That physical change can be, for example, a change from the solid state to
the liquid state or a change from the liquid state to the vapor state. The
substance employed in this manner is known as a refrigerant.
An example of a refrigeration process is described in The Encyclopedia of
Chemistry, Third Edition, Clifford A. Hampel at page 963;
The most commonly used process for making use of the change from liquid to
vapor state of the refrigerant is the vapor compression cycle, which
involves a recirculation of the refrigerant by means of a positive
displacement compressor driven by a prime mover. In this process,
high-pressure refrigerant vapor from the compressor enters a heat
exchanger (condenser) in which it condenses, rejecting sensible heat from
work done upon it during compression plus its latent heat of vaporization.
The condensate flows through a restriction (expansion valve or other
similar device) thus undergoing a drop in pressure, during which a
sufficient portion of the refrigerant vaporizes to reduce the temperature
of the remaining liquid to that consistent with the lower pressure. The
liquid-vapor mixture then enters a heat exchanger (evaporator) and absorbs
heat equivalent to the latent heat of vaporization of that portion of the
refrigerant existing as liquid. The resulting low pressure vapor then
passes to the compressor to complete the cycle. Thus it is evident that a
refrigerant acts as an agent for transporting heat from a lower to a
higher temperature level.
The principles and technology of refrigeration are well known to persons of
skill in the art. For others desiring more knowledge concerning the
subject many books, articles, etc. are available for study. More
information can be obtained, for example, from the Kirk-Othmer
Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Third Edition, Volume 20, pages
78-107, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Among the substances available for use as refrigerants are the halocarbons.
The halocarbons include fluorinated carbon compounds, chlorinated carbon
compounds and brominated carbon compounds. The fluorocarbons (i.e.,
fluorinated aliphatic compounds) are the most commonly used halocarbon
refrigerants. A discussion relating to fluorocarbons (i.e., fluorinated
aliphatic compounds) can be found in the Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of
Chemical Technology, Third Edition, Volume 10, pages 856-870. Examples of
halocarbon refrigerants include, but are not limited to, the following:
______________________________________
Refrig-
erant Chemical
Number Chemical Name Formula
______________________________________
10 carbon tetrachloride CCl.sub.4
11 trichlorofluoromethane
CCl.sub.3 F
12 dichlorodifluoromethane
CCl.sub.2 F.sub.2
13 chlorotrifluoromethane
CClF.sub.3
13B1 bromotrifluoromethane CBrF.sub.3
14 carbon tetrafluoride CF.sub.4
20 chloroform CHCl.sub.3
21 dichlorofluoromethane CHCl.sub.2 F
22 chlorodifluoromethane CHClF.sub.2
23 trifluoromethane CHF.sub.3
30 methylene chloride CH.sub.2 Cl.sub.2
31 chlorofluoromethane CH.sub.2 ClF
32 methylene fluoride CH.sub.2 F.sub.2
40 methyl chloride CH.sub.3 Cl
41 methyl fluoride CH.sub.3 F
110 hexachloroethane CCl.sub.3 CCl.sub.3
111 pentachlorofluoroethane
CCl.sub.3 CCl.sub.2 F
112 1,1,2,2-tetrachloro-1,2-difluoroethane
CCl.sub.2 FCCl.sub.2 F
112a 1,1,1,2-tetrachloro-2,2-difluoroethane
CCl.sub.3 CClF.sub.2
113 1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
CCl.sub.2 FCClF.sub.2
113a 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2,2-trifluoroethane
CCl.sub.3 CF.sub.3
114 1,2-dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane
CClF.sub.2 CClF.sub.2
114a 1,1-dichloro-1,2,2,2-tetrafluoroethane
CCl.sub.2 FCF.sub.3
114B2 1,2-dibromo-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane
CBrF.sub.2 CBrF.sub.2
115 chloropentafluoroethane
CClF.sub.2 CF.sub.3
116 hexafluoroethane CF.sub.3 CF.sub.3
120 pentachloroethane CHCl.sub.2 CCl.sub.3
123 1,1-dichloro-2,2,2-trifluoroethane
CHCCl.sub.2 CF.sub.3
124 1-chloro-1,2,2,2-tetrafluoroethane
CHClFCF.sub.3
124a 1-chloro-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane
CHF.sub.2 CClF.sub.2
125 pentafluoroethane CHF.sub.2 CF.sub.3
133a 1-chloro-2,2,2-trifluoroethane
CH.sub.2 ClCF.sub.3
140a 1,1,1-trichloroethane CH.sub.3 CCl.sub. 3
142b 1-chloro-1,1-difluoroethane
CH.sub.3 CClF.sub.2
143a 1,1,1-trifluoroethane CH.sub.3 CF.sub.3
150a 1,1-dichloroethane CH.sub.3 CHCl.sub.2
152a 1,1-difluoroethane CH.sub.3 CHF.sub.2
160 ethyl chloride CH.sub.3 CH.sub.2 Cl
218 octafluoropropane CF.sub.3 CF.sub.2 CF.sub.3
C316 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane
C.sub.4 Cl.sub.2 F.sub.6
C317 chloroheptafluorocyclobutane
C.sub.4 ClF.sub.7
C318 octafluorocyclobutane C.sub.4 F.sub.8
1112a 1,1-dichloro-2,2-difluoroethylene
CCl.sub.2 .dbd.CF.sub.2
1113 chlorotrifluoroethylene
CClF.dbd.CF.sub.2
1114 tetrafluoroethylene CF.sub.2 .dbd.CF.sub.2
1120 trichloroethylene CHCl.dbd.CCl.sub.2
1130 1,2-dichloroethylene CHCl.dbd.CHCl
1132a vinylidene fluoride CH.sub.2 .dbd.CF.sub.2
1140 vinyl chloride CH.sub.2 .dbd.CHCl
1141 vinyl fluoride CH.sub.2 .dbd.CHF
______________________________________
Hydrocarbons, especially the lower molecular weight hydrocarbons (i.e.,
molecular weight no more than about 72), have also been used as
refrigerants. Examples of hydrocarbon refrigerants include, but are not
limited to, the following:
______________________________________
Refrigerant Chemical
Number Chemical Name Formula
______________________________________
50 methane CH.sub.4
170 ethane CH.sub.3 CH.sub.3
290 propane CH.sub.3 CH.sub.2 CH.sub.3
600 butane CH.sub.3 CH.sub.2 CH.sub.2 CH.sub.3
600a isobutane (2-methylpropane)
CH(CH.sub.3).sub.3
1150b ethylene CH.sub.2 .dbd.CH.sub.2
1270b propylene CH.sub.3 CH.dbd.CH.sub.2
______________________________________
Most halocarbon refrigerants are nonflammable and nontoxic. They have been
widely used in refrigeration processes with great success. The halocarbon
refrigerants, however, generally cost more than the hydrocarbon
refrigerants. Furthermore, halocarbons, such as the fluorinated
aliphatics, are believed to have an adverse environmental effect on the
ozone layer in our atmosphere
By employing a refrigerant that is a mixture of hydrocarbon and halocarbon
instead of a refrigerant consisting only of halocarbon at least two
advantages are gained. First, a savings in cost is realized because the
hydrocarbon is less expensive than the portion of halocarbon replaced by
it. Second, the use of less halocarbon mitigates the damage to the
atmosphere.
A disadvantage associated with the use of a mixture of hydrocarbon and
halocarbon as a refrigerant is found in the fact that the hydrocarbon is
flammable. Hydrocarbon vapor in air forms a flammable mixture when the
concentration of hydrocarbon vapor in the air falls within a range defined
by the upper and lower flammability limits. The presence of a nonflammable
halocarbon narrows this flammability range. As the amount of halocarbon is
increased relative to the amount of hydrocarbon, the flammability range is
further narrowed. At some point the amount of the halocarbon is sufficient
to render the hydrocarbon/halocarbon combination completely nonflammable
because the combination is incapable of forming a flammable mixture with
air (i.e., the flammability range has been narrowed such that the upper
and lower flammability limits coincide).
The problem of flammability associated with a hydrocarbon/halocarbon
refrigerant is not as simple as the above discussion might seem to
suggest. The danger of flammability is not completely eliminated by merely
selecting an initial halocarbon concentration sufficiently high to render
the initial mixture completely nonflammable. The complexity of the problem
is illustrated by the following example.
Consider a refrigerant consisting of a hydrocarbon and a halocarbon wherein
the concentration of halocarbon is sufficiently high such that the mixture
is completely nonflammable. Assume that the refrigeration apparatus is
damaged and the refrigerant is allowed to escape from confinement in the
form of vapor. As the vapor refrigerant escapes liquid refrigerant
evaporates to take its place. The evaporation will proceed so long as
vapor continues to escape. The evaporation results in a fractionation of
the components. The composition of the vapor escaping from confinement and
of the liquid will differ and will change continually. If the hydrocarbon
has a boiling point below that of the halocarbon the initial vapor phase
fraction will have a hydrocarbon concentration higher than that of the
liquid. Thus the initial vapor phase fraction may be flammable. As the
evaporation (fractionation) proceeds the concentration of hydrocarbon in
the vapor phase will decrease and the vapor will eventually become
nonflammable. If the hydrocarbon has the lower boiling point the initial
vapor phase fraction will have a halocarbon concentration higher than that
of the liquid. Thus the initial vapor phase fraction will be nonflammable.
As the evaporation (fractionation) proceeds the concentration of
halocarbon in the vapor will decrease. The concentration of halocarbon in
the vapor at the later stages of evaporation will be less than the
concentration of halocarbon in the initial nonflammable refrigerant. The
vapor becomes flammable when the amount of halocarbon relative to the
amount of hydrocarbon falls below the point of nonflammability. This
occurs despite the fact that the initial refrigerant was nonflammable.
It is one objective of this invention to provide a hydrocarbon-containing
refrigerant of reduced flammability. This objective and other objectives,
advantages and aspects of this invention will become apparent upon
studying this disclosure and the appended claims.
In accordance with this invention, the refrigerant of this invention is
used as a refrigerant in a refrigeration process. The refrigeration
process can be any type that employs a refrigerant. The essence of this
invention lies in the choice of refrigerant and not in any other aspect of
refrigeration. For this reason, the terms refrigeration and refrigeration
process should be broadly interpreted.
The refrigerant of this invention is a mixture of at least three components
(a), (b) and (c) where the boiling point of (a) is lower than the boiling
point of (b) and the boiling point of (b) is lower than the boiling point
of (c). In one embodiment of this invention (a) and (c) are hydrocarbons
and (b) is a substantially nonflammable halocarbon. In another embodiment
of this invention (a) and (c) are substantially nonflammable halocarbons
and (b) is a hydrocarbon. Note that in either case the boiling point of
(b) is bracketed by the boiling points of (a) and (c).
This bracketing concept is utilized to reduce the problem of flammability
associated with hydrocarbon/halocarbon refrigerant mixtures. Consider
first the case where (a) and (c) are hydrocarbons. By dividing the total
hydrocarbon content between the lowest boiling component (a) and the
highest boiling component (c) the flammability-inhibiting influence of the
substantialy nonflammable halocarbon is increased. Recall that the
halocarbon will narrow the flammability range and, if a sufficient amount
is present, render the mixture completely nonflammable. If the total
hydrocarbon content is in (a) the initial vapor fractions will be high in
hydrocarbon content and low in halocarbon content. During the later stages
of evaporation the halocarbon content will be unnecessarily high. If the
total hydrocarbon content is in (c) the initial vapor fractions will be
unnecessarily rich in halocarbon content. The hydrocarbon will dominate
the later stages of evaporation. By dividing the hydrocarbon content
between (a) and (c), the halocarbon (b) will be useful during both the
initial and later stages of evaporation.
Consider now the case where (a) and (c) are halocarbons and (b) is a
hydrocarbon. The flammability-inhibiting influence of (a) is greatest
during the first half of the evaporation. The flammability-inhibiting
influence of (c) is greatest during the last half of the evaporation. By
dividing the total halocarbon content between (a) and (c) the flammability
of the mixture is more efficiently inhibited.
This invention is not limited to any amounts, relative or absolute, of the
various components (a), (b) and (c). The most effective amounts of each
will depend upon a number of factors such as, for example, the
flammability of the hydrocarbon components, the boiling points or rates of
evaporation of the components relative to each other, etc. With this in
mind the guidelines given below are contemplated to be generally useful in
the practice of this invention.
With respect to the mixture where (a) and (c) are hydrocarbons and (b) is a
halocarbon, it is generally contemplated that the amount of (a) will be
about 70 to about 130 percent by weight of the amount of (c). In one
embodiment of the invention neither the amount of (a) nor the amount of
(c) exceeds about 9 weight percent; and the total amount of (a) and (c)
does not exceed about 12 weight percent based upon the total weight of
(a), (b) and (c). More hydrocarbon can be used but the risk of increased
flammability should be recognized.
With respect to the mixture where (a) and (c) are halocarbons and (b) is a
hydrocarbon, it is generally contemplated that the amount of (a) will be
about 70 to about 130 percent by weight of the amount of (c). In an
embodiment of the invention the amount of (b) does not exceed about 12
weight percent based upon the total weight of (a), (b) and (c). More
hydrocarbon can be used but the risk of increased flammability should be
recognized.
The refrigerant of this invention is not limited to only three components.
The refrigerant mixture containing (a) hydrocarbon, (b) halocarbon, and
(c) hydrocarbon can further include (d) a second substantially
nonflammable halocarbon where the boiling point of (d) is either lower
than the boiling point of (a) or greater than the boiling point of (c). In
this manner, the boiling point of either (a) or (c) is bracketed by the
boiling points of (b) and (d). If the boiling point of (d) is less than
the boiling point of (a), then (d) will primarily help reduce flammability
during the initial stages of evaporation. If the boiling point of (d) is
greater than the boiling point of (c), then (d) will primarily help reduce
flammability during the later stages of evaporation. Although this
invention is not limited thereto, it is generally contemplated that the
amount of (d) will not exceed about 20 percent by weight of the amount of
(b).
The refrigerant can include five or more components. A five component
refrigerant could include, for example, (a) hydrocarbon, (b) halocarbon
and (c) hydrocarbon as above plus (d) a substantially nonflammable
halocarbon and (e) a substantially nonflammable halocarbon where the
boiling point of (d) is greater than the boiling point of (c) and the
boiling point of (e) is less than the boiling point of (a). In this manner
the boiling points of both (a) and (c) are bracketed. Although this
invention is not limited thereto, it is generally contemplated that
neither the amount of (d) nor the amount of (e) will exceed about 20
percent by weight of (b).
Although this invention is not limited thereto, it is contemplated that the
total amount of hydrocarbon in the refrigerant will generally not exceed
about 12 weight percent based upon the total weight of hydrocarbon and
halocarbon. For example, halocarbons (d) and (e), if used, should be
included in the calculation of hydrocarbon weight percent. More
hydrocarbon can be used but the risk of increased flammability should be
recognized.
The hydrocarbons of this invention can be any of the hydrocarbons
previously identified or any others that are useful for refrigeration
purposes.
The halocarbons of this invention can be any of the halocarbons previously
identified that are substantially nonflammable. Other substantially
nonflammable halocarbons that are useful as refrigerants can also be used.
The fluorinated aliphatic refrigerants are well suited for this invention.
The examples which follow are provided to help more clearly and more
completely describe this invention.
EXAMPLE I
This example describes the procedure used for determining the flammability
of the various hydrocarbon-fluorcarbon blends disclosed herein. Each test
began by evacuating either a 6 ounce aerosol can without an induction
(dip) tube or a heavy-duty tempered glass Fischer-Porter compatibility
bottle having valves at both ends. The aerosol can was approximately 4.25
inches.times.2 inches having a 223 milliliter capacity. The Fischer-Porter
compatibility bottle was approximately 9 inches.times.2 inches having a
350 milliliter capacity. The evacuated container (i.e., can or bottle) was
pressure filled with the components of the desired blend to about
two-thirds full. The pressure on the container did not exceed about 130
psig at 25.degree. C. Each blend to be studied (liquid and gas phase) was
generally analyzed prior to testing for flammability by GLC (gas-liquid
chromatography) analysis using a 30 foot.times.0.125 inch copper tubing
packed with a standard material, 19 weight percent bis (2-methoxy ethoxy)
ethyl ether and 1 weight percent squalene on 60-80 mesh chromosorb P. The
column was operated isothermally at 40.degree. C. using a flame ionization
detector and a helium flow of 30 milliliters per minute. The blends were
analyzed initially with the can full and after venting a specific amount
of material, usually after 25, 50, 70, 90 and/or 95% vented.
The apparatus used for determining the flammability of these blends was a
630 milliliter capacity (10 inches .times.50 millimeter I.D.) tempered
glass cylinder into which air and the desired amount of vapor or liquid
phase of the blend were directly admitted. The top of the glass cylinder
was sealed with a rubber stopper containing a small vent, which was closed
during ignition attempts, and the bottom of the cylinder was sealed with
aluminum foil adhered to the cylinder with silicone grease. This permitted
the safe release of combustion gases when ignition occurred. Two
electrodes spaced 4 millimeters apart (gap) were situated approximately in
the middle of the vertical cylinder. Each electrode entered the cylinder
from opposite sides of the cylinder wall. One electrode was grounded and
the other was attached to a high frequency, Tesla type, coil which
consisted of an adjustable interruptor, a vibrating spark gap, a
condenser, a resonator coil and a gap tip. The coil was capable of
producing an adjustable spark from 0 to 50,000 volts.
The hydrocarbon-fluorocarbon blend vapor and an air stream were metered
through separate calibrated rotameters and blended into a single stream
which entered the bottom of the glass cylinder. Air entered the cylinder
at 200 milliliters per minute. The rate at which the blend vapor entered
the cylinder was varied from 27 to 51.5 milliliters per minute thus
permitting testing of the blend/air mixture through much of its
flammability range. An electric spark from the high frequency coil was
passed across the electrode gap to ignite the vapor, if flammable.
Flammability determinations of the liquid phase was accomplished by
injecting 0.2 to 0.4 milliliters of liquid, using a 5 milliliter capacity
Pressure-Lok "Syringe" (Precision Sampling Corp.), directly into the
air-filled ignition chamber. Since the syringe was calibrated into 0.1
milliliter divisions, small amounts of the liquids could be accurately
dispensed. Usually 0.2 to 0.4 milliliters were used. The liquids was
vaporized upon entering the ignition chamber. If flammable, the vaporized
liquid was ignited in the manner described above.
EXAMPLE II
A hydrocarbon-fluorocarbon blend was prepared by weighing the amount of
each component charged to the can or bottle. A typical analysis of the
hydrocarbon used herein is shown in Table I.
TABLE I
______________________________________
Hydrocarbon Composition
A-70.sup.a A-108.sup.a
Boiling Point .degree.F.
______________________________________
Ethane 0.1 mol % 0.1 mol % --
Propane
50.4 mol % 99.0 mol % -43.7
n-Butane
1.9 mol % 0.1 mol % 31.1
Isobutane
47.6 mol % 0.8 mol % 10.9
______________________________________
.sup.a Available from Phillips Petroleum Co. A70 .RTM. and A108 .RTM. are
registered trademarks of Phillips Petroleum Company.
The A-70 is principally propane and isobutane. The A-108 is principally
propane.
The fluorocarbons used herein are listed in Table II. These are referred to
hereinafter as "FC".
TABLE II
______________________________________
Fluorocarbons
Identification
Formula Boiling Point .degree.F.
______________________________________
FC-11.sup.a CCl.sub.3 F
74.8
FC-12.sup.b CCl.sub.2 F.sub.2
-21.6
FC-22.sup.b CHClF.sub.2
-41.4
FC-114.sup.c CClF.sub.2 CClF.sub.2
38.4
______________________________________
.sup.a Available from Kaiser Chem. Co., 14 or 16 ounce cans
.sup.b Purchased locally in 1 pound cans (14 or 16 ounces).
.sup.c Available from Matheson Division of Searle Medical Products, Inc.
EXAMPLE III
This example illustrates the level of flammability of a
fluorocarbon-hydrocarbon mixture when subjected to various levels of
venting. In this example, the fluorcarbon FC-12 has a boiling point
between that of the two principal hydrocarbon components, propane and
isobutane. The data listed in Table III indicate that the mixture was
flammable in air whenever the fluorcarbon to hydrocarbon molar ratio was
below about 2.7/1.
TABLE III
__________________________________________________________________________
Flammability Level of a
Hydrocarbon-Fluorocarbon Mixture
Ratio
Composition
FC-12:
Blend, Wt. %
Wt. %
Phase
Mole %.sup.a
Hydro-
Flamm-
Blend
FC-12
A-70
Vented
Tested
C.sub.3
FC-12
C.sub.4
carbon
ability
__________________________________________________________________________
1 86.5
13.5
0 Liquid
14.6
71.4
14.0
2.50
Yes
Vapor
20.1
70.9
9.0
2.44
Yes
50 Liquid
8.0
70.5
21.5
2.39
--
Vapor
13.0
74.0
13.0
2.85
No
90 Vapor
6.0
70.5
23.5
2.39
Yes
2 88.0
12.0
0 Liquid
12.0
75.0
13.0
3.00
No
Vapor
17.0
73.7
9.3
2.80
No
50 Liquid
8.0
74.2
17.8
2.88
No
Vapor
12.5
76.3
11.2
3.00
No
90 Vapor
5.2
74.7
20.1
2.95
No
3 90 10 0 Liquid
11.1
78.7
10.2
3.69
No
Vapor
16.5
76.3
7.2
3.22
No
25 Liquid
8.9
78.5
12.6
3.65
No
Vapor
14.1
78.3
7.6
3.61
No
50 Liquid
5.3
78.2
16.5
3.59
--
Vapor
9.0
80.0
11.0
4.00
No
70 Liquid
5.5
77.3
17.2
3.41
No
Vapor
8.8
79.9
4.3
6.1 No
90 Vapor
3.8
76.4
19.8
3.24
No
95 Liquid
1.4
62.8
35.8
1.69
Yes
Vapor
2.1
72.6
25.3
2.65
Yes
4 92 8 0 Liquid
8.6
82.8
8.6
4.80
No
Vapor
11.0
82.0
7.0
4.56
No
25 Liquid
7.0
82.5
10.5
4.71
No
Vapor
9.7
83.7
6.6
5.13
No
70 Liquid
4.2
81.5
14.2
4.43
No
Vapor
7.2
83.4
9.4
5.02
No
95 Liquid
1.1
71.8
27.1
2.54
Yes
Vapor
1.7
76.6
21.7
3.27
No
5 93.5
6.5
0 Liquid
7.1
85.8
7.1
6.04
No
Vapor
-- -- -- -- No
70 Liquid
2.8
85.0
12.2
5.67
No
Vapor
4.6
87.6
7.8
7.06
No
95 Liquid
2.0
82.5
15.5
4.71
No
Vapor
3.0
86.8
10.2
6.58
No
6 95.0
5 0 Liquid
5.6
88.8
5.6
7.93
No
Vapor
-- -- -- -- No
70 Liquid
2.9
89.7
7.4
8.7 No
Vapor
4.1
90.4
5.5
9.4 No
95 Liquid
1.0
83.4
15.1
5.18
No
Vapor
1.8
88.2
10.0
7.47
No
__________________________________________________________________________
.sup.a Analysis includes small amount of ethane and nbutane. Ingredients
from left to right are listed in order of increasing boiling point.
EXAMPLE IV
This example illustrates the flammability of a fluorocarbon-hydrocarbon
mixture where a portion of a fluorocarbon (FC-12) having a boiling point
between that of the two principal components of the hydrocarbon mixture
(A-70) is partially replaced with a fluorocarbon (FC-11) having a boiling
point significantly higher than the boiling point of the highest boiling
principal hydrocarbon component (isobutane). The data listed in Table IV
indicate that flammability began at a fluorocarbon-to-hydrocarbon ratio of
about 3.0/1.
TABLE IV
__________________________________________________________________________
| | |