|
Description  |
|
|
Polycarbonates comprise a family of engineering thermoplastics that may be
utilized for diverse applications. When polycarbonates are molded into
complex shapes, it is usually necessary to employ high temperatures to
obtain the proper melt flow to ensure the complete filling of the mold.
The use of high temperatures, i.e. above about 350.degree. C., is
undesirable because certain materials that are employed with
polycarbonates are not stable at high temperatures.
The applicant has discovered that the use of a multiphase composite
interpolymer of an acrylate and a methacrylate; a copolymer which
comprises acrylonitrile, butadiene and an alkenyl aromatic compound; and a
copolymer of an olefin and an acrylate with a major amount of a
polycarbonate will result in a molding composition having good
processability as evidenced by a high melt flow index. By selection of
certain compositions embraced by the invention, it is possible to obtain
polycarbonate molding compositions which significantly retain their impact
strength and possess good compatibility as measured by weld line strength
but have a reduced melt viscosity and are readily processable at lower
temperatures. These compositions are especially advantageous for use in
molding complex shapes or detailed designs.
In U.S. Pat. No. 3,130,177, compositions that consist of a polycarbonate
and an acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) copolymer are described. West
German Pat. No. 1,109,884 describes compositions of a polycarbonate with
styrene-acrylonitrile-styrene resins U.S. Pat. No. 3,880,783 describes
transparent compositions of a particular group of polycarbonates that may
include ABS polymers. Additionally, a composition of a major amount of a
polycarbonate, a multiphase composite interpolymer of an acrylate and a
methacrylate, and a copolymer of an olefin and an acrylate has been on
sale for more than a year and is claimed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,260,693,
issued Apr. 7, 1981.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The compositions of the invention are thermoplastic molding compositions
which comprise:
(a) a major quantity of high molecular weight aromatic polycarbonate resin;
(b) a multiphase composite interpolymer which comprises a C.sub.1-5
acrylate and a C.sub.1-5 methacrylate;
(c) a copolymer of acrylonitrile, butadiene and an alkenyl aromatic
compound; and
(d) a copolymer of a C.sub.2-5 olefin and a C.sub.1-5 acrylate.
The quantities of (b), (c) and (d) are such that a high melt flow index is
obtained.
Specific compositions will have quantities of (b), (c) and (d) such that
impact strength of the compositions in thick section, compatibility as
measured by double gate impact strength, and the melt flow index all
remain high. These preferred results are obtained by utilizing, in
particular, appropriate quantities of the acrylonitrile, the butadiene and
the alkenyl aromatic moieties of (c). This relationship will be
demonstrated in the data of this specification.
The polycarbonate resin may be of the formula:
##STR1##
wherein A is a divalent aromatic radical of a dihydric phenol. Preferred
polycarbonate resins are of the formula:
##STR2##
wherein R.sup.1 and R.sup.2 are hydrogen, (lower) alkyl or phenyl and n is
at least 30 or preferably between 40 and 400. The term (lower) alkyl
includes alkyl groups of from 1-6 carbon atoms.
High molecular weight, thermoplastic, aromatic polycarbonates in the sense
of the present invention are to be understood as homopolycarbonates and
copolycarbonates and mixtures thereof which have a number average
molecular weight of about 8,000 to more than 200,000, preferably of about
10,000 to 80,000 and I.V. of 0.30 to 1.0 dl/g as measured in methylene
chloride at 25.degree. C. These polycarbonates are derived from dihydric
phenols such as, for example, 2,2-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)propane,
bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)methane, 2,2-bis(4-hydroxy-3-methylphenyl)propane,
4,4-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)heptane,
2,2-(3,5,3'-5'-tetrachloro-4,4'-dihydroxyphenyl)propane,
2,2-(3,5,3'5'-tetrabromo-4-4'-dihydroxydiphenyl)propane, and
(3,3'-dichloro-4,4'-dihydroxyphenyl)methane. Other dihydric phenols which
are also suitable for use in the preparation of the above polycarbonates
are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,999,835; 3,028,365; 3,334,154 and
4,131,575.
These aromatic polycarbonates can be manufactured by known processes, such
as, for example, by reacting a dihydric phenol with a carbonate precursor
such as phosgene in accordance with methods set forth in the above-cited
literature and U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,018,750 and 4,123,436, or by
transesterification processes such as are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.
3,153,008, as well as other processes known to those skilled in the art.
The aromatic polycarbonates utilized in the present invention also include
the polymeric derivatives of a dihydric phenol, a dicarboxylic acid, and
carbonic acid, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,169,121.
It is also possible to employ two or more different dihydric phenols or a
copolymer of a dihydric phenol with a glycol or acid terminated polyester,
or with a dibasic acid in the event a carbonate copolymer or interpolymer
rather than a homopolymer is desired for use in the preparation of the
aromatic polycarbonate utilized in the practice of this invention. Also
employed in the practice of this invention can be blends of any of the
above materials to provide the aromatic polycarbonate.
Branched polycarbonates, such as are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,001,184,
can be utilized in the practice of this invention, as can blends of a
linear polycarbonate and a branched polycarbonate.
The multiphase composite interpolymers which comprise a C.sub.1-5 acrylate
and a C.sub.1-5 methacrylate are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,260,693 and
in U.S. Pat. No. 4,096,202, both of which are incorporated by reference.
These interpolymers consist of about 25 to 95 weight percent of a first
elastomeric phase polymerized from a monomer system comprising about 75 to
99.8 percent by weight of a C.sub.1-5 alkyl acrylate, 0.1 to 5 percent by
weight cross-linking monomer, and 0.1 to 5 percent by weight of
graftlinking monomer, and about 75 to 5 weight percent of a final rigid
thermoplastic phase polymerized in the presence of said elastomeric phase.
The crosslinking monomer is a polyethylenically unsaturated monomer having
a plurality of addition polymerizable reactive groups all of which
polymerize at substantially the same rate of reaction. Suitable
crosslinking monomers include poly acrylic and poly methacrylic esters of
polyols such as butylene diacrylate and dimethacrylate, trimethylol
propane trimethacrylate, and the like; di- and trivinyl benzene, vinyl
acrylate and methacrylate, and the like. The preferred crosslinking
monomer is butylene diacrylate.
The graftlinking monomer is a polyethylenically unsaturated monomer having
a plurality of addition polymerizable reactive groups, at least one of
which polymerizing at substantially different rates of polymerization from
at least one other of said reactive groups. The function of the
graftlinking monomer is to provide a residual level of unsaturation in the
elastomeric phase, particularly in the latter stages of polymerization
and, consequently, at or near the surface of the elastomer particles.
When the rigid thermoplastic phase is subsequently polymerized at the
surface of the elastomer, the residual unsaturated addition polymerizable
reactive group contributed by the graftlinking monomer participates in the
subsequent reaction so that at least a portion of the rigid phase is
chemically attached to surface of the elastomer. Among the effective
graftlinking monomers are alkyl group-containing monomers of alkyl esters
of ethylenically unsaturated acids such as allyl acrylate, allyl
methacrylate, diallyl maleate, diallyl fumarate, diallyl itaconate, allyl
acid maleate, allyl acid fumarate, and allyl acid itaconate. Somewhat less
preferred are the diallyl esters of polycarboxylic acids which do not
contain polymerizable unsaturation. The preferred graftlinking monomers
are allyl methacrylate and diallyl maleate.
A most preferred interpolymer has only two stages, the first stage
comprising about 60 to 95 percent by weight of the interpolymer and being
polymerized from a monomer system comprising 95 to 99.8 percent by weight
butyl acrylate, 0.1 to 2.5 percent by weight butylene diacrylate as
crosslinking agent, 0.1 to 2.5 percent by weight allyl methacrylate or
diallyl maleate as a graft-linking agent, with a final stage polymerized
from about 60 to 100 percent by weight methyl methacrylate.
The acrylonitrile-butadiene-alkenyl aromatic compound copolymers are well
known. The preferred copolymers are made from
acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene and acrylonitrile-butadiene-alpha-methyl
styrene. Also useful are acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene wherein the
phenyl group is substituted by alkyl groups, preferably p-alkyl styrene
and more preferably wherein the alkyl group is methyl. The
acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene resins are available commercially.
The weight percents of the preferred acrylonitrile-butadiene-alkenyl
aromatic compound copolymers are from about 15-30 : 20-40 : 30-65,
respectively and more preferably about 17-25 : 22-38 : 37-61,
respectively.
The copolymer of an olefin and an acrylate is a copolymer of a C.sub.2-5
olefin and a C.sub.1-5 acrylate that may be employed in the practice of
the invention is a copolymer of an olefin such as ethylene, propylene,
isobutylene, pentene and the like. The C.sub.2-5 acrylate may be an
acrylate such as ethyl acrylate; n-butyl acrylate; 1,3-butylene
diacrylate; methyl acrylate; 1,4-butanediol diacrylate and isobutyl
acrylate.
The acrylate portion of the olefin-acrylate copolymer based on the total
weight of the copolymer, can range from about 10 to about 30 weight
percent. The olefin portion can range from about 70 to about 90 weight
percent. The preferred olefin-acrylate copolymer is an ethylene-ethyl
acrylate copolymer, in which the weight ratio of the ethylene fraction to
the ethyl acrylate fraction is about 4.5 to 1. These olefin acrylate
copolymers are commercially available or may be prepared by methods that
are well known to those who are skilled in the art.
Generally, the compositions of the invention will comprise about 55 to 95
parts by weight and more preferably from about 80 to 95 parts by weight of
a polycarbonate, from about 2 to 35 parts and more preferably from about 4
to 12 parts by weight of a copolymer of an acrylonitrile-butadiene-alkenyl
aromatic compound, from about 0.5 to 15 parts by weight and more
preferably from about 1 to 12 parts by weight of the multiphase composite
interpolymer which comprises a C.sub.1-5 acrylate and a C.sub.1-5
methacrylate and from about 0.5 to 10 parts by weight and more preferably
from about 1 to 5 parts by weight of a copolymer of a C.sub.2-5 olefin and
a C.sub.1-5 acrylate. All parts by weight are per 100 parts of the sum of
the polycarbonate; acrylonitrile-butadiene-alkenyl aromatic copolymer,
multiphase composite interpolymer and olefin acrylate copolymer in the
composition.
The compositions of the invention may include reinforcing fillers, such as
aluminum, iron or nickel and the like and nonmetals, such as carbon
filaments, silicates, such as acicular calcium silicate, acicular calcium
sulfate, wollastonite, asbestos, titanium dioxide, bentonite, kaolinite
potassium titanate and titanate whiskers, glass flakes and fibers and
mixtures thereof. It is also to be understood that, unless the filler adds
to the strength and stiffness of the composition, it is only a filler and
not a reinforcing filler, as contemplated herein. In particular, the
reinforcing fillers increase the flexural strength, the flexural modulus,
the tensile strength and the heat distortion temperature.
Although it is only necessary to have at least a reinforcing amount of the
reinforcement present, in general, the reinforcing filler may comprise
from about 1 to about 60 parts by weight of the total composition.
In particular, the preferred reinforcing fillers are of glass, and it is
preferred to use fibrous glass filaments comprised of lime-aluminum
borosilicate glass that is relatively soda free. This is known as "E"
glass. However, other glasses are useful where electrical properties are
not so important, e.g., the low soda glass known as "C" glass. The
filaments are made by standard processes, e.g., by steam or air blowing,
flame blowing and mechanical pulling. The preferred filaments for
reinforcement are made by mechanical pulling. The filament diameters range
from about 0.003 to 0.009 inch, but this is not critical to the present
invention.
By glass fibers, it is understood that glass silk, as well as all glass
fiber materials derived therefrom including glass fiber fabrics, rovings,
stable fibers and glass fiber mats are included. The length of the glass
filaments and whether or not they are bundled into fibers and the fibers
bundled in turn to yarns, ropes or rovings, or woven into mats, and the
like, are also not critical to the invention. However, when using fibrous
glass filaments, they may first be formed and gathered into a bundle known
as a strand. In order to bind the filaments into a strand so that the
strand can be handled, a binder or binding agent is applied to the glass
filaments. Subsequently, the strand can be chopped into various lengths as
desired. It is convenient to use the strands in lengths of from about 1/8"
to about 1" long, preferably less than 1/4" in length. These are called
chopped strands. Some of these binding agents are polymers such as
polyvinyl acetate, particular polyester resins, polycarbonates, starch,
acrylic melamine or polyvinyl alcohol. Preferably, the composition
contains from about 1 to about 50 weight percent of the glass fibers.
Flame retardant amounts of flame retardants may also be utilized in the
composition of the invention in amounts of from 0.5-50 parts by weight of
the resinous components. Examples of suitable flame retardants may be
found in U.S. Pat. No. 3,936,400 and 3,940,366 which are inincorporated by
reference. Other conventional nonreinforcing fillers, antioxidants,
extrusion aids, light stabilizers, foaming agents such as those disclosed
in U.S. Pat. No.4,263,409 and Ger. Offen. No. 2,400,086 which are
incorporated by reference and the like may be added to the composition of
the invention if desired.
The manner of preparing the inventive composition is conventional.
Preferably, each ingredient is added as part of a blend premix and the
latter is mixed, e.g., by passage through an extuder, or by fluxing on a
mill at a temperature dependent on the particular composition. The mixed
composition may be cooled and cut up into molding granules and molded into
the desired shape.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The present invention is further illustrated in the following examples
which are set forth as a further description of the invention. All parts
are by weight.
The term double gate (DG) is used in the examples to report the weld line
strength of samples prepared in a double gate mold which have been tested
according to ASTM D256. The superscripts for the impact data in the
examples refer to the percent ductility of the samples. Unless otherwise
stated, the compositions are 100% ductile. The term MFI refers to the melt
flow index obtained according to ASTM D1238, condition O at 300.degree. C.
in terms of grams per 10 minutes. Units for notched Izod are ft. lbs/inch
of notch and performed according to ASTM D256; DG values are in ft/lbs.
EXAMPLE 1
A 1500.0 g molding composition was prepared from 91 parts by weight of a
polycarbonate of 2,2-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)propane having an intrinsic
viscosity of 0.46 dl/g as measured in methylene chloride at 25.degree. C.,
3 parts by weight of a multiphase interpolymer comprising a weight ratio
of about 4 to 1 of n-butyl acrylate to methyl methacrylate*; 5 parts by
weight of a copolymer of acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene**; and 1.0 parts
by weight of an ethylene-ethyl acrylate copolymer*** by mechanically
mixing the ingredients in a tumbler and thereafter extruding and
pelletizing the composition.
The pellets were injection molded and test specimens
1/8".times.5".times.1/4" and 1/2".times.5".times.1/4" were prepared. The
Izod impact values are reported in Table 1.
Acryloid KM 330 Rohn & Haas, Phila. Pa.
Kralastic U.S.S. Chemicals; acrylonitril/butadiene styrene 20/24/56
Bakelite DPD 6169 Union Carbide, Danbury, Conn.
TABLE 1
______________________________________
MFI 1/8" NOTCHED IZOD
1/4" NOTCHED IZOD
DG
______________________________________
A.sup.1
26 12.7.sup.100 .sup. 3.0.sup.0
40.3
B.sup.2
10 14.8.sup.100 .sup. 1.6.sup.0
40.0
C.sup.3
11 14.8.sup.100 13.6 40.0
D.sup.
25 12.6 8.9 30.9
______________________________________
.sup.1 Control: polycarbonate 95; and ABS copolymer 5.0 (Kralastic SLS)
.sup.2 Control: polycarbonate
.sup.3 Control: polycarbonate 95.0, KM330 4.0, ethyleneethyl-acrylate 1.
As shown by the data it is only the proper mix of all the components of the
invention which bring about a composition profile which has very good
processability as shown by a high MFI while substantially maintaining or
even improving the impact strength of the control compositions.
EXAMPLE 2
Following the procedure of Example 1, further 1500 gms samples were
prepared utilizing bisphenol-A polycarbonate of the same intrinsic
viscosity, the same multiphase interpolymer of n-butylacrylate and methyl
methacrylate and the same ethylene ethyl acrylate as used in Example 1 in
the proportions of 86, 3 and 1 weight percent. The remaining weight
percent of the composition, 10 weight percent, is from a particular tested
acrylonitrile (A)-butadiene(B)-styrene(S). The samples were extruded and
molded as in Example 1. The results of the impact and melt viscosity
testing presented below in Table 2 show the effect of the particular A, B
and S quantities in the ABS resin.
TABLE 2
______________________________________
A/B/S IMPACT STRENGTH
(WT. RATIO) 1/8" NI 1/4" NI DG MFI
______________________________________
E.sup.4
0/63/37 7.2 3.4.sup.0
4.0.sup.0
11.6
F.sup.5
13/45/42 13.1 9.1 16.4 10.2
G.sup.6
14/32/54 15.2 11.7 6.9.sup.0
12.7
H.sup.7
17/38/45 11.7 9.5 30.4 19.6
I.sup.8
22/23/55 13.3 8.0 29.4 24.4
J.sup.9
20/24/56 10.0 6.5 16.5 33.0
______________________________________
.sup.4 Solprene 414P (Phillips)
.sup.5 401 (Borg Warner)
.sup.6 Lustran L648 (Monsanto)
.sup.7 Kralastic K2540 (USS)
.sup.8 Kralastic K2938 (USS)
.sup.9 Kralastic SLS (USS)
As shown by the data, a butadiene-styrene polymer without acrylonitrile, E,
provides poor impact resistance, brittle failure and a low melt flow
index. The addition of acrylonitrile in F makes the breaks ductile and
increases the impact resistance. The low melt flow index is maintained.
The ABS of G provides a slightly higher notched impact resistance and melt
flow index but the compatibility of the composition as measured by double
gate has substantially decreased in comparison to F. Samples H, I and J
are all within the preferred ABS ranges. Each one of the compositions
shows substantial retention of impact strength, excellent compatibility as
measured by double gate impact and high melt flow index.
EXAMPLE 3
A 1500.0 g molding composition containing 76 parts by weight of the
polycarbonate of Example 1; 20 parts by weight of the copolymer of
acrylonitrile-butadiene- styrene of Example 1, 3.0 parts by weight of the
multiphase interpolymer of Example 1 and 1.0 parts by weight of the
ethylene-ethyl acrylate copolymer of Example 1 was prepared using the same
procedure employed in Example 1. The test results are set forth in Table
3.
TABLE 3
______________________________________
MFI 1/8" NOTCHED IZOD
1/4" NOTCHED IZOD
DG
______________________________________
K 47.2 10.4 8.2 3.3
L.sup.10
14.3 14.7 12.8 3.2
______________________________________
.sup.10 Control: same as K except no ethyleneethylacrylate and 4.0 parts
of KM330.
As shown by the data, a high melt flow index can be obtained in the
non-preferred area of the composition parameters. However, impact
resistance is significantly impaired and compatibility of the compositions
is not high in either instance. The effect that the olefin acrylate
component has on melt flow is demonstrated by this data.
Obviously, other modifications and variations of the present invention are
possible in the light of the above teachings. It is, therefore, to be
understood that changes may be made in the particular embodiment of the
invention described which are within the full intended scope of the
invention as defined by the appended claims.
* * * * *
|
|
|
|
|
Description  |
|