|
|
|
| United States Patent | 4548498 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/4548498.html |
| Inventor(s) | Folestad; Sven S. (Krukmakaregatan 1 C, S-414 60 Goteborg, SE);
Galle; Bo G. (Norska gatan 32, S-417 22 Goteborg, SE);
Johnson; Lars Goran I. (S.Viktoriagatan 52, S-411 30 Goteborg, SE);
Josefsson; Bjorn O. (Vaktmastareg.ang.ngen 16, S-413 18 Goteborg, SE) |
| Abstract | In a method and a device for laser induced fluorescence detection in liquid
chromatography a light beam (1) is directed from a laser source (2)
towards a liquid flowing in a chosen flow direction for the detection of
the presence of one or several substances. At a flow point illuminated by
the light beam (1) the liquid is brought to emit a fluorescence radiation
(3) which is received by a receiving unit (6). The light beam (1) is
directed substantially perpendicularly to the flow direction of the
liquid. The liquid is brought to pass the illuminated flow point in the
form of a column with an accurately defined surface. The fluorescence
radiation (3) is received in a direction which deviates from directions
emanating from the illuminated flow point perpendicularly from the flow
direction of the liquid column. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing from US Patent 4548498 |
|
|
Laser induced fluorescence detection in modern liquid chromatography
with conventional and micro columns |
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
October 22, 1985 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
January 3, 1983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Priority Data |
May 04, 1981[SE]8102772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
We claim:
1. A method of detecting laser induced fluorescence in a liquid flowing in
a chosen flow direction, to detect the occurrence of at least one chemical
component in the liquid, comprising the steps of: directing a single light
beam from a laser source substantially perpendicularly to the direction of
flow to thereby cause molecules at one point of flow illuminated by the
light beam to emit a fluorescent radiation; causing the liquid to pass
said point in the form of a column with an accurately defined surface; and
receiving the fluorescent radiation, by a receiving unit, in a direction
deviating from the direction emanating from the illuminated flow point
perpendicularly to the direction of flow.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein, for detection at relatively low
flow rates, said liquid column is a capillary consisting of quartz with a
low inherent fluorescence, said capillary being highly transilluminable at
said flow point.
3. A method according to claim 1, wherein, for flow rates from
substantially 1 ml/min, said liquid column is a freely falling liquid jet
with an accurately defined surface.
4. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein said accurately
defined surface is a cylinder mantle with a highly even surface structure.
5. An apparatus for detecting laser induced fluorescence in a liquid,
comprising: means for causing said liquid to flow in a chosen flow
direction; a laser source for directing a single light beam substantially
perpendicularly to the direction of flow to thereby cause molecules at one
point of flow illuminated by the light beam to emit a fluorescent
radiation; means for causing the liquid to pass said point in the form of
a column with an accurately defined surface; and means for receiving the
fluorescent radiation, in a direction deviating from the direction
emanating from the illuminated flow point perpendicularly to the direction
of flow.
6. An apparatus according to claim 5, wherein said liquid column is a
capillary consisting of quartz with a low inherent fluorescence, said
capillary being highly transilluminable at said flow point.
7. An apparatus according to claim 5, wherein, for flow rates from
substantially 1 ml/min, said liquid column is a freely falling liquid jet
with an accurately defined surface.
8. An apparatus according to any one of claims 5 to 7, wherein said
accurately defined surface is a cylinder mantle with a highly even surface
structure.
9. An apparatus according to claim 5, comprising means for focusing the
light beam substantially in the area of the illuminated flow point.
10. An apparatus according to claim 9, wherein said focusing means focuses
the light beam in a point, positioned somewhat in front of the liquid
column.
11. An apparatus according to claim 10, wherein said focusing means focuses
the light beam substantially 15 mm in front of the liquid column. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Extra column band broadening in detectors has been paid attention to since
high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was introduced. Accordingly,
as columns and injectors have been improved the requirement on detector
performance has increased to minimize peak broadening by dispersion. In
this respect the cell volume as well as connections play an important
role. The whole detector arrangement may influence the flow properties
which in turn affect the band spreading.
There is a growing interest in the use of miniaturized HPLC systems based
on packed microbore columns or open tubular columns. These chromatographic
systems may exhibit high resolving power together with a low flow rate of
the mobile phase. The microbore packed column technique was introduced by
Scott and Kucera [1,2] (for these and other references indicated in
brackets please refer to list at end of the specification). They pointed
out the importance of diminishing the detector cell volume to utilize the
separation effiency of the column. Ishii et al [3,4] constructed a
miniaturized HPLC system with open tubular columns which have essentially
smaller inner diameters of about 50 .mu.m. With this technique the
detector cell requires still smaller volumes, in the range of 0.1-1 .mu.l.
Knox and Gilbert [5] calculated that the effective detection volumes
should be in the order of 1-10 nl before there is any hope of operating
capillary HPLC systems under optimal conditions. They also stated that the
practical limitation to capillary HPLC arises from the dispersion by the
detector.
When considering different small volume detectors the fluorescence
technique is promising because of its high sensitivity. HPLC fluorescence
detectors utilizing laser excitation radiation have recently been
introduced [6, 7, 8]. Laser fluorimetry has some important characteristics
which may be advantageous with small volume detectors. The produced
emission radiation is directly proportional to the intense laser
excitation light which leads to extreme sensitivity. Another property is
the spatial coherence of the laser beam which facilitates the irradiation
of small detector volumes. In addition the monochromaticity of the laser
makes it easier to suppress scattered light from Rayleigh and Raman
processes as well as reflexions without sacrificing sensitivity.
Diebold and Zare [6] presented a windowless flow cell where the HPLC
effluents flow from a steel capillary tube down to a rod 2 mm below
forming a droplet bridge of 4 .mu.l volume. Focusing the laser beam to a
small spot inside the droplet facilitates rejecting the elastically
scattered light. With a pulsed HeCd laser and the use of gated detection
electronics they achieved very high sensitivity when determining
aflatoxins. Hershberger et al. [7] designed a HPLC cell based on the
sheath flow principle where the affluent is injected in the center of an
ensheathing solvent stream under laminar flow conditions. The laser beam
enlighted cell volume is very small or in the range of 6-150 nl. Since the
windows are not in contact with the sample flow the stray light from the
windows is reduced. Sepaniak and Yeung [8] used a quartz capillary tube
where the HPLC effluent moved upwards. A focused laser beam was placed in
the effluent underneath an optical fiber. The emitted light was collected
through the fiber perpendicular to the laser beam. The construction leads
to a minimal influence of scattered and fluorescent light from the
capillary tube walls. The limiting factors of fluorescence detectability
are to a great part connected with background noise from the cell, optical
components, solvent and sample contaminants. The reduction of the
background emission is highly dependent on the detector cell design. The
objective of this invention is to design a laser based detector ideal to
use with conventional HPLC columns as well as microbore columns. Special
attention has been paid to the effective cell volume regarding extra
column effects by comparing the efficiency of the two systems.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
The invention is illustrated, by way of example, in the accompanying
drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of detector cell arrangements, namely, (a)
free falling jet, and (b) a microbore column quartz capillary;
FIG. 2 shows a schematic diagram of the experimental instrumentation
arrangement;
FIG. 3 shows the relative fluorescence intensity versus focus location on
the falling jet;
FIG. 4 shows stability of the falling jet with hexane as mobile phase;
FIG. 5 shows separation of a standard mixture of 11 Dns-hydrazones;
FIG. 6 shows the minimum detectable quantity of fluoranthene;
FIG. 7 shows log h versus log .nu. for conventional HPLC with different
detectors;
FIG. 8 shows log h versus log .nu. for microbore column with different
detectors; and
FIG. 9 shows schematic view of laser inducing fluorescence detection
directly on a HPLC quartz capillary column.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of detector cell arrangements, namely (a)
free falling jet, (b) microbore column quartz capillary. In this figure, A
is a laser focusing point; B a syringe needle SGE, 17 mm, ID 0.12 mm, OD
0.5 mm. C is a cyanoacrylate adhesive. D is SS tubing 1/16", 15 mm, ID 0.2
mm. E is a fused silica capillary, 60 mm, ID 0.20 mm, OD 0.30 mm. F is SS
tubing 1/16", 17 mm, ID 0.35 mm.
FIG. 2 shows a schematic diagram of the experimental instrumentation
arrangement.
FIG. 3 shows the relative fluorescence intensity versus focus location on
the falling jet (OD 0.3 mm). Maximum response is found 15 mm ahead of the
jet. Column Nucleosil 7.5 .mu.m, mobile phase hexane containing
fluoranthene, flow rate 2 ml/min.
FIG. 4 shows stability of the falling jet with hexane as mobile phase. Drop
formation occurs in the shaded area. The flow rate is plotted against the
distance between the column effluent exit and the laser excitation point.
FIG. 5 shows separation of a standard mixture of 11 Dns-hydrazones. The
column is 200.times.4.6 mm, Nucleosil RP-18 5 .mu.m. Mobile phase,
methanol:water, linear gradient 50 to 100% in 12 min. Flow rate 1.3
ml/min. 10 .mu.l injected and 1=Dns-hydrazine, 2=Formaldehyde,
3=Acetaldehyde, 4=Acetone, 5=Propanal, 6=Butanal, 7=Pentanal,
8=Benzaldehyde, 9=Hexanal, 10=Heptanal, 11=Octanal, 12=Nonanal.
FIG. 6 shows the minimum detectable quantity of fluoranthene. The column is
200.times.4.6 mm, Nucleosil 7.5 .mu.m, mobile phase hexane. Flow rate 2
ml/min. Injected volume 10 .mu.l. 1=Anthracene, 2-Fluoranthene 20 fg.
FIG. 7 shows the plot of log h versus log .nu. for conventional HPLC with
different detectors. Column 150.times.4.6 mm, Nucleosil 7.5 .mu.m, mobile
phase hexane:methylene chloride 5%. Solution anthracene.
FIG. 8 shows the plot of log h versus log .nu. for microbore column with
different detectors. Column 400.times.1.0 mm, Nucleosil 7.5 .mu.m, mobile
phase hexane:methylene chloride 5%. Solution anthracene.
EQUIPMENT
Conventional HPLC system
An LDC chromatographic system consisting of two Constametric III pumps and
a Gradient Master was used. Injections were made with a Valco injector
with a 10 .mu.l loop. Separations were performed on a 150 mm.times.4.6 mm
column packed with Nucleosil 7.5 .mu.m Silica and on a 200 mm.times.4.6 mm
Nucleosil 5 .mu.m RP18 column. The columns were mounted in a rack and
pinion arrangement which allowed vertical adjustment. Hexane, methanol and
methylenechloride solvents from Rathburn Chemicals (HPLC grade) and double
distilled water were used in different mobile phase compositions.
For comparative studies an FS 970 LC Fluorimeter from Schoeffel Instruments
were used, equipped with a Corning 7-54 primary filter and a 418 nm cut
off secondary filter. The excitation wavelength was set to 360 nm.
Microbore HPLC system
The low flow-rates were maintained with a Waters M-6000 A pump. The
frequency generator of the pump was disconnected and replaced by a
Tektronix FG 502 Function Generator. Samples were injected with a Valco
air actuated valve having a fixed sample volume of 0.5 .mu.l. Columns were
constructed from 10 and 20 cm lengths of 1/16" OD, 1 mm ID SS tubing.
Nucleosil 7.5 .mu.m Silica particles were suspended in methanol and pumped
into the columns at a pressure of 600 bar using a Haskel DST 150 air
driven fluid pump. Acetone, methylenechloride and the appropriate effluent
composition were used for conditioning purposes.
Laser detectors
Free Falling jet
The effluent from the conventional HPLC columns was arranged by means of a
free falling thin jet. The jet stream was produced by a small bore
capillary which is shown in FIG. 1. A short piece of a SGE syringe needle,
OD 0.5 mm and ID 0.12 mm, is inserted in a 1/16" SS tubing ID 0.2 mm,
drilled out to fit the syringe needle. The needle is fixed with
cyanoacrylate adhesive. The capillary was then connected to the column
end. The construction gives a very fine jet of the column effluent at
flow-rates down to approximately 1 ml/min.
Quartz capillary tube
An alternative detector design to the falling jet was required at
flow-rates below 1 ml/min. Different quartz capillary tubes were tested
for flow rates typical of miniaturized HPLC systems. It was found that
fused silica capillary ID 0.2 mm and OD 0.3 mm from Hewlett Packard
commonly used as GC/GC columns yielded lowest fluorescence background. The
capillary was mounted to the column end inside a steel capillary tube as
shown in FIG. 1. The polyimide coating on the fused silica capillary was
carefully burnt off on a distance of 5 mm just below the end of the SS
tubing using a gas flame. The uncovered area was then washed with
methylenechloride. The laser beam is focused on the uncovered part of the
capillary. The capillary tube allows any flow rate commonly used in
conventional as well as microbore HPLC.
Optical arrangements
In FIG. 2 a schematic view of the optical system is outlined. As excitation
source the monocromatic output from a Coherent Radiation CR 3000 K Krypton
ion CW laser run in the UV-mode was used. This laser emits radiation at
351 and 356 nm with a total effect of 1-2 W. After suppressing the bluish
fluorescence light, emanating from the laser cavity by means of a bandpass
color filter UG1, the laser beam was focused with a quarts lens onto the
detector cell underneath the column. Due to circumstances out of
applicants' control different lenses were used with focal lengths ranging
from 15 to 60 cm. In order to avoid the strong scattered light in the
horizontal plane emanating from the cylindrical surface of the vertically
mounted detector cell, detection was achieved at an angle of approximately
30.degree. to this plane. After reflexion in a front surface mirror the
fluorescence light is collected and focused onto the entrance slit of a
Jobin Yvon HL monochromator using a quartz lens (f=15,.phi.=10). Depending
on the nature of the experiment the entrance slit was varied between 1-6
mm, while the exit slit was fixed at 17 mm yielding a bandpass of 28 nm.
For convenience the monochromator was centered at 450 nm during all
experiments. A compromise was made between maximum fluorescence yield and
rejection of the Raman peak of water and hexane as well as elastically
scattered light. The elastically scattered light was further suppressed
with a cut-off filter WG 385 or GG 420 before reaching the
photomultiplier-tube (EM1 9558 QB). The output of the PMT is then, after
amplification, fed to a stripchart recorder. All experiments were
performed under dark room conditions.
Procedure and results
Detection by means of the free falling jet
Investigations were carried out to find the maximum signal response by
varying the focusing point of the laser beam vis-a-vis the falling jet.
Different distances between the lens and the jet were tested at which the
focus was located in front of, inside and behind the jet. The results are
shown in FIG. 3. The experiment was facilitated by pumping a hexane
solution containing a constant concentration of fluoranthene as marker.
The maximum response was expected to be symmetrical around the distance
corresponding to the focal length of the lens. However, maximum response
was found when the laser beam was focused 15 mm ahead of the falling jet,
corresponding to a laser beam diameter comparable to the diameter of the
jet. No other maxima were found. One possible explanation of this
discrepancy is that the distance from the lens to the true focus is not
identical with the lens focal length. This effect may be due to the
divergence of the laser and imperfections in the optical components.
Scanning the laser beam horizontally, maximum response was achieved when
the laser beam was in the center of the jet. At maximum response an
intense disc of reflected light appeared in the plane perpendicular to the
jet stream.
The optical properties of the jet are dependent on e.g. flow rates, solvent
properties and diameter of the capillary. With the capillary diameter of
0.12 mm different flow rates were run to establish the minimum flow
without turbulence. As shown in FIG. 4 the hexane as mobile phase could be
used down to a flow of 1.2 ml/min. For gradient runs (methanol:water 0 to
100% in 10 min.) an unaffected baseline was achieved at a flow rate of 1.5
ml/min. Droplet formation appeared at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min when water
content was approximately 55%. An example of a gradient run is shown in
FIG. 5.
A brief test of how the signal depended upon varying the effect of the
laser resulted in that no saturation could be observed.
Quartz capillary cell
The laser beam was focused directly on the quartz capillary in the same way
as with the falling jet. The background noise increased six times.
However, the signal increased with the same factor, thus the signal to
noise ratio remained constant. The increased signal may be a result of a
more favorable geometry of the quartz capillary tube which results in
multiple internal reflexions.
Detection limit
Under the conditions used for the falling jet, the minimum detection limit
was established. FIG. 6 shows a chromatogram of an injected sample
containing 20 fg fluoranthene (20.times.10.sup.-15 g in 10 .mu.l hexane).
The capacity value was 3.2 and the signal to noise ratio was 13. The
linear flow through the quartz capillary detector was about 300 cm/s.
Since the laser excitation volume is about 1 nl there are very few
molecules present in the measured volume.
Applications
There are a limited number of compounds which emit fluorescent light.
Furthermore they should be excited at the laser wavelengths available.
Partly these restrictions may be overcome by using the fluorescence
labeling technique [9]. A chromatogram of 11 Dns-hydrazone derivatives of
carbonyl compounds is shown in FIG. 5. The laser free falling jet detector
was used to illustrate a gradient elution application.
Comparison of different detector systems coupled to a conventional HPLC
column
A conventional fluorescence detector as well as the two different laser
detectors were coupled to an HPLC column. The column system and the
separation conditions were the same in the three experiments. Thus the
cell arrangements could be compared according to band broadening on the
detector side. The HETP curves for the three cases are shown in FIG. 7.
The respective detector dead volumes were: Schoeffel detector
approximately 5 .mu.l; the falling jet 0.6 .mu.l and the quartz capillary
1.0 .mu.l. The illuminated volume with the two laser detectors was about 1
nl. Thus the differences in the HETP curve are mainly derived from the
connections.
The band broadening in the capillary connection tubes was calculated from
the formula by Taylor [10] which is valid under conditions of laminar
flow. The falling jet variance was .delta..sup.2 =1.49 .mu.l.sup.2 and
the quartz capillary yielded .delta..sup.2 =2.84 .mu.l.sup.2 at the flow
rate of 1.5 ml/min. These band broadening contributions are very small
compared to the total dispersion in the connection tubings.
Comparison of different detectors coupled to a microbore column
The quartz capillary detector cell was tested with a micro bore column. A
comparison under same conditions was made with a conventional HPLC
fluorescence detector with a relatively small detector cell dead volume.
The HETP curve is shown in FIG. 8. In the experiment the pump flow rates
were in the range 100 to 400 .mu.l/min.
Discussion
In a recently published review Yeung and Sepaniak [11] discussed the
potential to use laser fluorimetric detection in HPLC. The previously
reported laser based detectors are characterized by complicated
constructions e.g. to suppress straylight. Furthermore the detectors are
not designed to be used with a miniaturized system or gradient elution.
The only detector that may be used with gradient operation, is the cell
based on an optical fiber inside a quartz tube cell (20 .mu.l cell
volume). However, this detector is difficult to make smaller without
concomitant decrease in sensitivity. The free falling jet principle is a
straightforward approach and it has been practised in turbidimeters to
measure scattered light from particles. The jet is characterized by
stability and a well defined smooth surface also during gradient elution
with flow rates typically of conventional HPLC columns. The background is
easy to suppress with the collecting optics out of the perpendicular plane
to the jet stream. Actually a 30.degree. angle results in a background
signal decrease of 6 magnitudes. This arrangement yields the highest
sensitivity or a detection capacity is the fg-level. When using laser
excitation with its well defined beam it is far easier to manipulate the
optics than to complicate the construction of the flow cell.
The use of quartz capillaries as flow cells in fluorescence is very common.
The most critical factor with quartz materials is the background
fluorescence. Compared to the falling jet cell the quartz capillary flow
cell has only one advantage, namely that low flow rates are possible which
in turn is necessary for HPLC-systems.
As mentioned in the introduction one main advantage of laser excitation is
the possibility to irradiate small detector volumes. Therefore laser based
detectors may be successful with miniaturized systems. Hershberger et al.
[7] reported the possibility to use a detector volume down to 1 nl. This
is true for the laser irradiated volume in their detector, however, by no
means for the whole detector volume including the connections.
Miniaturized HPLC systems are characterized by narrow peaks. The peaks
should not be dispersed anywhere in the detector system. Conventional
detectors with dead volumes of 5 .mu.l are not feasible to use without an
additional make-up liquid to sweep the detector [12, 13]. The decrease of
sensitivity by dilution effects may be partly compensated by laser
excitation, however, this does not constitute an adequate solution. The
central point to achieve detectors with minimal or nearly no dead volume
is to take into account the connecting tubes. The results in this report
show the advantage to transfer the solutions to the detection area in a
straight short small bore capillary. Then the maintained laminar flow
produces a negligiable dispersion. The quartz capillary detection cell in
this report is 33 mm long and has a volume of 1.04 .mu.l. By using a
smaller ID column e.g. 0.05 mm the volume is 65 nl. The final solution is
to locate the laser beam directly on the separation quartz capillary
column, FIG. 9.
In the above there has consequently been described a method and a device
for the detection of the presence of certain substances in a liquid by
measuring the fluorescence radiation of the substances. The substances
have been brought to fluorescence by means of a laser beam which is
brought to illuminate the liquid over a minimum of volume at a flow point,
where the liquid is flowing in a certain direction from a device for
chromatographic separation. This device is represented in FIG. 1 by means
of a unit 5 designated HPLC and a column 9, in which different substances
are separated by means of their different physical and chemical properties
and in this way the substances are brought to consecutively pass said flow
point. This flow point can consequently be either a free falling liquid
jet or a liquid channel in a capillary. Common is that the liquid passes
the illuminated flow point in the form of a column with an accurately
defined surface. The accurately defined surface is for example cylindrical
with a highly even surface so that no disturbing refractive phenomenons
are obtained. Essential is further that the laser beam is directed
perpendicularly to the longitudinal direction of the liquid column, that
is to say the flow direction of the liquid.
The device further includes a receiving unit 6 for the reception of the
fluorescence radiation 3 emitted from the illuminated flow point.
Essential is that the fluorescence radiation 3 is received in a direction
outside the plane through the flow point which is perpendicular to the
flow direction of the liquid. In this way scattering light and other
nondesirable radiation is avoided caused by the radiation from the laser
beam source, which is especially dominating in said direction and in this
way the fluorescence radiation with a longer wavelength can be received
with a minimum of disturbance level.
The above method and device has been described in connection with
separation of a plurality of substances, but it is of course imaginable
that the invention can be applied in such cases where the presence of a
single substance will be detected.
REFERENCES
[1] R. P. W. Scott and P. Kucera, J. Chromatogr. 125 (1976) 251
[2] R. P. W. Scott and P. Kucera, J. Chromatogr. 169 (1979) 51
[3] D. Ishii, K. Asai, K. Hibi, T. Jonokuchi and M. Nagaya, J. Chromatogr.
144 (1977) 157
[4] Ishii and Takeuchi, J. Chrom. Sci. 18 (1980) 462
[5] J. H. Knox and M. T. Gilbert, J. Chromatogr. 186 (1979) 405
[6] G. J. Diebold and R. N. Zare, Science 196 (1979) 1444
[7] L. W. Hershberger, J. B. Callis and G. D. Christian, Anal. Chem. 51
(1979) 1444
[8] M. J. Sepaniak and E. S. Yeung, J. Chromatogr. 190 (1980) 377
[9] L. Johnson, B. Josefsson, P. Marstorp and G. Eklund Int. J. Enviro.
Anal. Chem., 9 (1981) 7
[10] G. Taylor, Proc. R. Soc. (London) 219A (1953) 186
[11] E. S. Yeung and M. J. Sepaniak, Anal. Chem. 52 (1980) 1465A
[12] T. Tsuda and M. Novotny, Anal. Chem. 50 (1978) 271
[13] M. Krejci, T. Tesarik and J. Pajurek, J. Chromatogr. 191 (1980) 17.
* * * * *
|
|
|
|
|
Description  |
|