|
|  Custom CD of patents similar to US4620284 : Qualitative and quantitative analysis using Raman scattering - $19.95 |
| United States Patent | 4620284 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/4620284.html |
| Inventor(s) | Schnell; Robert P. (Deerfield, IL);
Sampson; Robert W. (Wayne, IL);
Pacanowski; Ronald F. (Hoffman Estates, IL);
Bruggema; Donald J. (Wheeling, IL) |
| Abstract | Methods and apparatus are provided for qualitative and quantitative
analysis utilizing the Raman effect. Analyses are obtainable without
exercise of human judgment or human interpretation. Analyses may be
obtained on-line in the field or in a laboratory. A wide range of fluids
and solids are capable of rapid routine analysis without major adjustment
of equipment. An analysis is obtained by comparing a Raman spectrum of the
unknown sample to Raman spectra of samples whose analysis is known. The
known Raman spectra are stored in computing means in digital form and the
comparison is accomplished by the computing means. |
| |
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing from US Patent 4620284 |
|
|
Qualitative and quantitative analysis using Raman scattering |
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
October 28, 1986 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
December 29, 1983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 2527121
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 2527122
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 2940355
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3414354
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3556659
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3625613
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3820897
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4505586 Tochigi 356/301 Mar,1985 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4397556 Muller 356/301 Aug,1983 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4365303 Hannah 702/28 Dec,1982 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4267572 Witte 702/23 May,1981 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4195930 Delhaye 356/301 Apr,1980 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4127329 Chang 356/301 Nov,1978 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4068953 Harney 356/301 Jan,1978 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4030827 Delhaye 356/301 Jun,1977 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3723007 Leonard 356/301 Mar,1973 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4270864 Barrett 356/301 Dec,1969 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Technical Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
We claim as our invention:
1. A method for determining the composition of an unknown sample
comprising:
(a) producing a beam of photons which is substantially monochromatic and
impinges on the unknown sample;
(b) collecting photons scattered by the unknown sample into a stream of
scattered photons;
(c) resolving the photon stream into its component frequencies to form a
Raman spectrum of the unknown sample;
(d) providing said unknown sample Raman spectrum to a computer;
(e) providing to the computer reference spectra obtained in the same manner
as said unknown spectrum, where the reference spectra are of reference
samples whose composition is known; and,
(f) identifying substances present in the unknown sample by comparing said
unknown spectrum to the reference spectra, said comparison being
accomplished by utilizing the computer and comprising the following steps:
(i) inspecting the unknown spectrum and selecting a plurality of separate
spectral analysis regions;
(ii) determining a size characteristic associated with each of said
spectral analysis regions of the unknown spectrum;
(iii) searching the reference spectra and choosing those reference spectra
having in the selected spectral analysis regions features corresponding to
those of the selected spectral analysis regions of the unknown spectrum
and size characteristics substantially identical to those of the selected
spectral analysis regions of the unknown spectrum;
(iv) if more than one reference spectrum is chosen, repeating steps (f)(i),
(f)(ii), and (f)(iii), selecting additional spectral analysis regions,
until only one reference spectrum is chosen, the substances present in
said one chosen reference spectrum being present in the unknown samples;
(v) if no reference spectrum is chosen, establishing a number of working
hypotheses, each hypothesis being that the unknown sample consists of a
different combination of the reference samples which exhibited the spectra
chosen to have features corresponding to those of the selected spectral
regions of the unknown spectrum;
(vi) testing each working hypothesis by combining the spectra of the
hypothesis to produce a single hypothetical spectrum and comparing it to
the unknown spectrum;
(vii) discarding each working hypothesis which is not substantially
identical to the unknown spectrum; and,
(viii) if more than one working hypothesis has not been discarded,
repeating steps (f)(v) through (f)(viii), selecting additonal spectral
analysis regions, until only one working hypothesis has not been
discarded, the unknown sample composition then being that of said one
remaining working hypothesis.
2. The method of claim 1 further characterized in that said size
characteristic is the height of the highest peak of the spectral analysis
region.
3. The method of claim 1 further characterized in that said size
characteristic is the area of the spectral analysis region.
4. The method of claim 1 further characterized with respect to step (f)(vi)
in that said testing is accomplised by:
(a) for each working hypothesis, establishing a set of equations consisting
of one equation associated with each selected region of the unknown
spectrum, which equation describes the area of the region in terms of
concentrations of the reference samples and areas of reference spectra
regions; and,
(b) attempting to solve each set of equations and concluding that each
working hypothesis whose set of equations cannot be completely solved or
yields unreal numbers is not substantially identical to the unknown
spectrum.
5. The method of claim 4 further characterized in that said equation
associated with each region is of the form
X.sub.1 C.sub.1 +X.sub.2 C.sub.2 + . . . +X.sub.n C.sub.n =A,
where
C.sub.1, C.sub.2, . . . C.sub.n =the concentration of the substance of
reference samples 1, 2, . . . n in the hypothetical combination of
reference samples,
X.sub.1, X.sub.2, . . . X.sub.n =the areas of those regions in each of the
reference spectra of the hypothetical combination, and
A=the area of the region of the unknown spectrum.
6. A method for performing a quantitative analysis for preselected
substances of an unknown sample comprising:
(a) producing a beam of photons which is substantially monochromatic and
impinges on the unknown sample;
(b) collecting photons scattered by the unknown sample into a stream of
scattered photons;
(c) resolving the photon stream into its component frequencies to form a
Raman spectrum of the unknown sample;
(d) providing said unknown sample Raman spectrum to a computer;
(e) providing to the computer reference spectra obtained in the same manner
as said unknown spectrum, where the reference spectra are of reference
samples whose quantitative composition is known and where each reference
sample is comprised of at least one of said preselected substances; and,
(f) identifying substances present in the unknown sample by comparing said
unknown spectrum to the reference spectra, said comparison being
accomplished by utilizing the computer and comprising the following steps:
(i) inspecting the reference spectra and selecting a plurality of separate
spectral analysis regions;
(ii) determining the areas of the selected regions for each reference
spectrum and for the unknown spectrum;
(iii) establishing a relationship between said reference spectra region
areas and concentrations of said preselected substances in said reference
samples; and,
(iv) determining the concentrations of said preselected substances in said
unknown sample by applying the relationship established in step (f)(iii)
to the unknown spectrum region areas.
7. The method of claim 6 further characterized with respect to step (f) in
that said relationship is established and said concentrations determined
by:
(a) selecting a number of spectral analysis regions equal to the number of
said preselected substances;
(b) determining the areas of the selected regions for each reference
spectrum and for the unknown spectrum and calculating area fractions for
the reference spectra and for the unknown spectrum;
(c) establishing a set of equations for each reference sample where the
number of equations in each set is equal to the number of said preselected
substances and each equation describes the concentration of one
preselected substance in terms of its contributions to region areas, each
equation having the form
X=C.sub.1x A.sub.1 +C.sub.2x A.sub.2 + . . . +C.sub.nx A.sub.n,
where
X represents the concentration fraction of the preselected substance,
A.sub.1, A.sub.2, . . . A.sub.n are area fractions of the selected regions
of the spectrum of the reference sample where n equals the number of
regions, and
C.sub.1x, C.sub.2x, . . . C.sub.nx are coefficients associated with the
contributions of the preselected substances to the regions;
(d) solving all of the equations established in step (c) for said
coefficients;
(e) establishing one set of equations for the unknown sample as was done in
step (c) for each reference sample; and,
(f) solving said unknown sample equations for the concentrations of the
preselected substances, using the coefficients determined in step (d).
8. The method of claim 6 further characterized with respect to steps
(f)(iii) and (f)(iv) in that said relationship is established and said
concentrations determined by:
(a) expressing said reference sample concentrations in terms of
concentration fractions and arranging the concentration fractions in a
concentration fraction matrix, according to said reference samples and
said preselected substances;
(b) calculating area fractions from said reference spectra region areas and
arranging the area fractions into an area fraction matrix, according to
said reference samples and the selected regions;
(c) determining a transpose matrix, which is the transpose of the area
fraction matrix;
(d) forming a mathematical quantity using said matrices, as follows:
##EQU4##
(e) solving said mathematical quantity to yield a matrix, which consists
of correlation coefficients, arranged according to the selected regions
and said preselected substances;
(f) calculating area fractions from said unknown spectrum region areas and
arranging the area fractions in a matrix; and,
(g) multiplying said correlation coefficient matrix by the matrix formed of
said unknown spectrum area fractions to obtain a product which is a
concentration fraction matrix which expresses the concentrations of the
preselected substances in said unknown sample.
9. The method of claim 6 further characterized in that the substances
comprising said unknown sample are paraffins, naphthenes, and aromatics.
10. The method of claim 6 further characterized in that said beam of
photons is from a laser source.
11. The method of claim 6 further characterized in that the wave lengths of
said beam of photons are closely centered about a value of 6328 angstroms.
12. The method of claim 6 further characterized in that photons are removed
from said stream of photons before it is resolved to form a spectrum, the
removed portion consisting of photons at the same frequency as said beam
of photons and at a higher frequency than the frequency of said beam of
photons.
13. The method of claim 6 further characterized in that composite reference
spectra are used in performing said comparison, a composite reference
spectrum being prepared for each reference sample by providing a plurality
of spectra of each reference sample to the computer and averaging each of
said plurality of reference spectra.
14. The method of claim 6 further characterized in that a portion of said
Raman spectrum is removed and not provided to the computer, such portion
consisting of Rayleigh scattered light and the anti-Stokes lines.
15. The method of claim 6 further characterized in that said unknown
spectrum and said reference spectra are adjusted to substantially remove
false information before said comparison is accomplished.
16. The method of claim 15 further characterized in that said false
information comprises a background spectrum, which is obtained in the same
general manner as a sample spectrum but with said beam of photons
interrupted, and said adjustment to remove false information is
accomplished by subtracting the background spectrum intensity from the
sample spectrum intensity at each frequency.
17. The method of claim 15 further characterized in that said false
information comprises sample fluorescence and stray photons and said
adjustment to remove false information is accomplished by means of
establishing baselines and discarding that portion of the spectrum which
is below the baselines.
18. Apparatus for determining the composition of an unknown sample
comprising:
(a) means for producing a beam of photons which is substantially
monochromatic and impinges on the unknown sample;
(b) means for collecting photons scattered by the unknown sample into a
stream of scattered photons;
(c) means for resolving the photon stream into its component frequencies to
form a Raman spectrum of the unknown sample;
(d) means for converting said unknown sample Raman spectrum to digital form
and transmitting said unknown spectrum to computing means;
(e) said computing means, which contain reference spectra obtained in the
same manner as said unknown spectrum, where the reference spectra are of
reference samples whose composition is known; and,
(f) means within the computing means for identifying substances present in
the unknown sample by comparing said unknown spectrum to the reference
spectra, said computing means accomplishing said comparison by performing
the following functions:
(i) inspecting the unknown spectrum and selecting a plurality of separate
spectral analysis regions;
(ii) determining a size characteristic associated with each spectral
analysis region of the unknown spectrum;
(iii) searching the reference spectra and choosing those reference spectra
having in the selected spectral analysis regions features corresponding to
those of the selected spectral analysis regions of the unknown spectrum
and size characteristics substantially identical to those of the selected
spectral analysis regions of the unknown spectrum;
(iv) if more than one reference spectrum is chosen, repeating functions
(f)(i), (f)(ii), and (f)(iii), selecting additional regions, until only
one reference spectrum is chosen, the substances present in said one
chosen reference spectrum being present in the unknown sample;
(v) if no reference spectrum is chosen, establishing a number of working
hypothesis, each hypothesis being that the unknown sample consists of a
different combination of the reference samples which exhibited the spectra
chosen to have features corresponding to those of the selected regions of
the unknown spectrum;
(vi) testing each working hypothesis by combining the spectra of the
hypothesis to produce a single hypothetical spectrum and comparing it to
the unknown spectrum;
(vii) discarding each working hypothesis which is not substantially
identical to the unknown spectrum; and,
(viii) if more than one working hypothesis has not been discarded,
repeating functions (f)(v) through (f)(viii), selecting additional
regions, until only one working hypothesis has not been discarded, the
unknown sample composition then being that of said one remaining working
hypothesis.
19. The apparatus of claim 18 further characterized with respect to
function (f)(vi) in that said testing is accomplished by:
(a) for each working hypothesis, establishing a set of equations consisting
of one equation associated with each selected region of the unknown
spectrum, which equation describes the area of the region in terms of
concentrations of the reference samples and areas of reference spectra
regions; and
(b) attempting to solve each set of equations and concluding that each
working hypothesis whose set of equations cannot be completely solved or
yields unreal numbers is not substantially identical to the unknown
spectrum.
20. The apparatus of claim 19 further characterized in that said equation
associated with each region is of the form
X.sub.1 C.sub.1 +X.sub.2 C.sub.2 + . . . +X.sub.n C.sub.n =A,
Where
C.sub.1, C.sub.2, . . . C.sub.n =the concentration of the substance of
reference samples 1, 2, . . . n in the hypothetical combination of
reference samples,
X.sub.1, X.sub.2, . . . X.sub.n =the areas of those regions in each of the
reference spectra of the hypothetical combination, and
A=the area of the region of the unknown spectrum.
21. Apparatus for performing a quantitative analysis for preselected
substances of an unknown sample comprising:
(a) means for producing a beam of photons which is substantially
monochromatic and impinges on the unknown sample;
(b) means for collecting photons scattered by the unknown sample into a
stream of scattered photons;
(c) means for resolving the photon stream into its component frequencies to
form a Raman spectrum of the unknown sample;
(d) means for converting said unknown sample Raman spectrum to digital form
and transmitting said unknown spectrum to computing means;
(e) said computer means, which contain reference spectra obtained in the
same manner as said unknown spectrum, where the reference spectra are of
reference samples whose quantitative composition is known and where each
reference sample is comprised of at least one of said preselected
substances; and,
(f) means within the computer for identifying substances present in the
unknown sample by comparing said unknown spectrum to the reference
spectra, said computer accomplishing said comparison by performing the
following functions:
(i) inspecting the reference spectra and selecting a plurality of separate
spectral analysis regions;
(ii) determining the areas of the selected regions for each reference
spectrum and for the unknown spectrum;
(iii) establishing a relationship between said reference spectra region
areas and concentrations of said preselected substances in said reference
sample; and
(iv) determining the concentrations of said preselected substances in said
unknown sample by applying the relationship established in function
(f)(iii) to the unknown spectrum region areas.
22. The apparatus of claim 21 further characterized with respect to element
(f) in that said relationship is established and said concentrations
determined by the following functions:
(a) selecting a number of spectral analysis regions equal to the number of
said preselected substances;
(b) determining the areas of the selected regions for each reference
spectrum and for the unknown spectrum and calculating area fractions;
(c) establishing a set of equations for each reference sample where the
number of equations in each set is equal to the number of said preselected
substances and each equation describes the concentration of one
preselected substance in terms of its contributions to region areas, each
equation having the form
X=C.sub.1x A.sub.1 +C.sub.2x A.sub.2 + . . . +C.sub.nx A.sub.n,
where
X represents the concentration fractions of the preselected substance,
A.sub.1, A.sub.2, . . . A.sub.n are area fractions of the selected regions
of the spectrum of the reference sample where n equals the number of
regions, and
C.sub.1x, C.sub.2x, . . . C.sub.nx are coefficients associated with the
contributions of the preselected substances to the regions;
(d) solving all of the equations established in function (c) for said
coefficients:
(e) establishing one set of equations for the unknown sample as was done in
function (c) for each reference sample; and,
(f) solving said unknown sample equations for the concentrations of the
preselected substances, using the coefficients determined in function (d).
23. The apparatus of claim 21 further characterized with respect to
functions (f)(iii) and (f)(iv) in that said relationship is established
and said concentrations determined by:
(a) expressing said reference sample concentrations in terms of
concentration fractions and arranging the concentration fractions in a
concentration fraction matrix, according to said reference samples and
said preselected substances;
(b) calculating area fractions from said reference spectra region areas and
arranging the area fractions into an area fraction matrix, according to
said reference samples and the selected regions;
(c) determining a transpose matrix, which is the transpose of the area
fraction matrix;
(d) forming a mathematical relationship using said matrices, as follows:
##EQU5##
(e) solving said mathematical quantity to yield a matrix, which consists
of correlation coefficients, arranged according to the selected regions
and said preselected substances;
(f) calculating area fractions from said unknown spectrum region areas and
arranging the area fractions in a matrix; and,
(g) multiplying said correlation coefficients matrix by the matrix formed
of said unknown spectrum area fractions to obtain a product which is a
concentration fraction matrix which expresses the concentrations of the
preselected substances in said unknown sample.
24. The apparatus of claim 21 further characterized in that the substances
comprising said unknown sample are paraffins, naphthenes, and aromatics.
25. The apparatus of claim 21 further characterized in that said beam of
photons is from a laser source.
26. The apparatus of claim 21 further characterized in that the wave
lengths of said beam of photons are closely centered about a value of 6328
angstroms.
27. The apparatus of claim 21 further comprising means for removing photons
from said stream of photons before it is resolved to form a spectrum, the
removed portion consisting of photons at the same frequency as said beam
of photons and at a higher frequency than the frequency of said beam of
photons.
28. The apparatus of claim 21 further comprising means for using composite
reference spectra in performing said comparison, a composite reference
spectrum being prepared for each reference sample by providing a plurality
of spectra of each reference sample to said computer means and averaging
each of said plurality of reference spectra.
29. The apparatus of claim 21 further comprising means for removing a
portion of said Raman spectrum, such portion consisting of Rayleigh
scattered light and the anti-Stokes lines.
30. The apparatus of claim 21 further comprising means for adjusting said
unknown spectrum and said reference spectra to substantially remove false
information before said comparison is accomplished.
31. The apparatus of claim 30 further characterized in that said spectrum
adjusting means comprises means for providing to said computer means a
background spectrum for use in accomplishing said adjustment to remove
false information, said background spectrum being obtained in the same
general manner as a sample spectrum but with said beam of photons
interrupted, and said adjustment to remove false information being
accomplished by subtracting the background spectrum intensity from the
sample spectrum intensity at each frequency.
32. The apparatus of claim 30 further comprising means for substantially
removing those portions of the spectra which comprise sample fluorescence
and stray photons by means of establishing baselines and discarding that
portion of the spectrum which is below the baselines. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to the detection of substances and measurement of
the quantities present. More particularly, it relates to qualitative and
quantitative analysis utilizing Raman spectra of the substances under
analysis.
The Raman effect, or Raman scattering, is well known. Briefly and simply,
when a beam of light impinges on substances, light is scattered. This
scattering is of several different types, the predominant type being
Rayleigh scattering, wherein the wave length of the scattered light is the
same as that of the incident light. In the type utilized in the present
invention, Raman scattering, the scattered light is of different wave
lengths than the incident light; photons are absorbed by the substance and
re-emitted at higher and lower wave lengths. A Raman spectrum of a
substance is constituted of Raman scattered light and is spread across a
wave length band even if the incident light is monochromatic, that is, all
of a single wave length. There is a separate Raman spectrum of a
particular substance for, or associated with, each incident wave length.
In practice, a monochromatic beam of incident light is always used in
Raman spectroscopy because of the difficulties in obtaining spectral
separation. When Raman and Rayleigh scattered light is resolved into a
spectrum by a spectrograph, Raman lines will appear on both sides of the
Rayleigh line. The Raman line or lines on the low frequency side (or low
wave number side or high wave length side) of the Rayleigh line are more
intense than those on the high frequency side and are called the Stokes
line or lines; those on the high frequency side are called the anti-Stokes
line or lines. Not all substances are Raman active; there must be a change
in polarizability during molecular vibration in order that a substance be
Raman active. Substances which do exhibit Raman spectra can be
characterized by means of their spectra. Qualitative analysis of a
substance can be accomplished by comparison of the locations of its Raman
lines with those of known standards. Quantitative analysis can be
accomplished by comparison of intensities of Raman lines; this is
generally a linear relationship. Of course, spectra which are compared
must result from exciting radiation of the same wave length. For purposes
of this document, a substance is defined as any composition of matter,
including a single element and a mixture or solution of chemical
compounds.
Raman spectroscopy has numerous applications and is a major research tool.
It is now a rapidly developing area, having been neglected for many years
in favor of infrared spectroscopy and ultraviolet spectroscopy. Advances
in the equipment available for Raman spectroscopy, particularly the
development of lasers as a source of monochromatic light, have provided
much impetus. A review of the field of Raman spectroscopy, including
theory, applications, potential, and citations to additional literature is
provided by two recent publications: Raman Spectroscopy, Long,
McGraw-Hill, 1977 and Chemical Applications of Raman Spectroscopy,
Grasselli et al., Wiley and Sons, 1981.
Though Raman spectroscopy is an important research technique and is used
for qualitative and quantitative analysis, there has not been available a
Raman analyzer, that is, apparatus which provides, rather than a spectrum,
an output comprising indication of substances present in a sample and, in
the case of a quantitative analyzer, numbers denoting the amounts present
of the constituent substances of a sample. There has not been available a
routine method of analysis utilizing the Raman effect which provides
qualitative or quantitative results which need no further processing or
interpretation. Further lacking has been universal Raman effect apparatus
and methods; that is, those that can be used for a wide variety of samples
without significant change to the apparatus being required when different
substances are to be analyzed. There are significant advantages in
effecting qualitative and/or quantitative analysis using Raman
spectroscopy in place of or in addition to conventional analysis methods.
INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
U.S. Pat. No. 4,068,953 (Harney et al.) deals with methods and apparatus
for measuring isotope ratios and isotopic abundances using the Raman
effect. Apparatus for remote sensing of gaseous materials is described in
U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,820,897 (Roess) and 3,625,613 (Abell) and an improvement
to the latter patent is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,723,007 (Leonard).
U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,414,354 (Siegler) and 3,556,659 (Hawes) describe
laser-excited Raman spectrometers. A Raman microprobe for producing
micrographic images of certain species in a sample is disclosed in U.S.
Pat. No. 4,195,930 (Delhaye et al.). An earlier patent of the same
inventors covering similar subject matter is U.S. Pat. No. 4,030,827.
Work accomplished using the Raman effect to analyze hydrocarbons is
disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,527,121 (Dudenbostel) and 2,527,122 (Heigl
et al.) and in an article by Heigl et al. entitled "Determination of Total
Olefins and Total Aromatics" which appeared in both Analytical Chemistry
(Vol. 21, p. 554, 1949) and Proceedings of the American Petroleum
Institute (Vol. 27-28, p. 90, 1948). Another reference covering the same
work is the report of a conference held by The Institute of Petroleum in
London in 1954 entitled "Molecular Spectroscopy".
Additional U.S. patents dealing with Raman spectroscopy are 4,127,329
(Chang et al.) and 2,940,355 (Cary). U.S. Pat. No. 4,270,864 (Barrett et
al.) is representative of several patents to Barrett dealing with
photoacoustical Raman spectroscopy.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,397,556 (Muller) claims method and apparatus for quality
control in which the Raman effect is used.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of this invention to provide methods and apparatus for
qualitative and quantitative analysis of substances in gaseous, liquid, or
solid form. More specifically, it is an object of this invention to
provide the capability of performing analyses rapidly and through a
relatively unskilled technician or without a technician in attendance at
all. Related is the object of providing methods and apparatus wherein no
human judgment and no human interpretation is necessary to produce
analyses. It is also an object of this invention to provide methods and
apparatus for rapidly analyzing substances which have heretofore required
complex procedures involving much sample handling and/or pretreatment by
various procedures. Also, it is an object of this invention to provide an
analysis which requires only a small amount of sample and to provide a
non-destructive method of analysis such that the sample is not altered or
consumed. This object is related to that of providing apparatus which
consumes little electrical power and does not heat the sample. It is a
further object of this invention to provide a method and apparatus to
analyze a substance in situ, that is, without withdrawing the substance
from a containing vessel or pipeline. It is a still further object of this
invention to provide an analysis apparatus which is modular in design and
construction, to facilitate troubleshooting and repair. Another object of
this invention is | | |