|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed is:
1. In a microlithographic system for optically projecting circuit patterns
on semiconductor wafers in which alignment between successive exposures is
provided by means of a microscope mounted to one side of the optical
projection column, there being a metered stage for transporting a wafer
between the microscope and the optical projection column, the method of
correcting the the baseline vector between the projection column and the
microscope, which method comprises:
placing, on said stage, a wafer with a light sensitive coating;
transporting said wafer to said column using an appropriate baseline vector
for controlling movement of said stage;
exposing said wafer from a reticle which includes pattern reference
markings to produce a visible latent image;
without removing said wafer from said stage, transporting said wafer to
said microscope;
by observing, with said microscope, the latent image on said film,
measuring the actual stage movement required to align the latent image of
said fiducial markings on said wafer with the microscope; and
correcting said baseline vector based on said actual measurement.
2. In a microlithographic system for optically projecting circuit patterns
from projection reticles onto semiconductor wafers in which alignment
between successive exposures is provided by means of a microscope mounted
to one side of the optical projection column, there being a metered stage
for transporting a wafer between the microscope and the optical projection
column, the method of correcting alignment between a projection reticle
and a wafer, which method comprises:
placing, on said stage, a wafer with a light sensitive coating;
transporting said wafer to said column using an appropriate baseline vector
for controlling movement of said stage;
exposing said wafer from a reticle which includes a plurality of pattern
reference markings to produce a visible latent image;
without removing said wafer from said stage, transporting said wafer to
said microscope;
by observing, with said microscope, the latent image on said film,
measuring the actual stage movement required to align each of the latent
image reference markings on said wafer with the microscope; and
calculating, from said several measurements, the relative positioning
corrections necessary for correcting alignment. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to microlithographic systems of the type used
for the manufacture of semiconductor devices by the printing of successive
circuit patterns on the surface of a semiconductor wafer, and more
particularly, to such a system in which alignment between successive
exposures is provided by means of a microscope mounted to one side of the
optical projection column.
As is understood by those skilled in the art, the successful manufacturer
of complex semiconductor devices requires that very precise registration
be maintained between the successive exposures which are used to produce
the successive layers required in building up such devices. To provide a
basis establishing registration between successive exposures, alignment
systems typically employ a system of fiducial markings. These markings
start out on a reticle or mask of the type used for forming the
semiconductor circuits themselves and are transferred to the surface of a
wafer by the lithographic process. After development of the first exposure
the mark is observed by means of a microscope and is used to initially
position each wafer prior to its being moved into the projections column
for subsequent exposures.
One of the problems with this prior art system is that it relies on there
being a precisely defined separation or base line vector between the point
of observation and the point in the optical projection column which
corresponds to the original location of the fiducial mark on the wafer
surface. To establish this base line vector, it has been typically
necessary to employ an elaborate setup or initialization procedure in
which two successive reticles are used to expose the wafer and, after
respective developments, the accuracy of the registration was determined
by microscopic observation. Typically, the two successive reticles
provided patterns which included x-and-y-axis vernier scales to facilitate
quantitative measurement of any offset.
Not only is this procedure time consuming and therefore expensive,
involving as it does two successive development procedures before any
feedback information is obtained, but the end result is a function not
only of the base line vector but also of the accuracy with which the
second reticle was aligned with the first and also the degree of accuracy
with which the wafer was initially positioned prior to its second trip
into the optical column for exposure. Further, the time required for this
procedure is so long, i.e., in the order of twenty five minutes or
greater, that the base line vector may in fact drift during this period.
As is understood by those skilled in the art, baseline drift can arise
through a variety of causes including such innocuous effects as slight
thermal changes in the optical column itself, barometric changes or
mechanical shock. While these changes may be small in an everyday context,
they can have considerable significance when it is desired to reduce an
overlay of complex optical patterns with an accuracy finer than a micron.
Among the several objects of the present invention it may be noted the
provision of an alignment scheme for a microlithographic system which
provides high accuracy; the provision of such an aligning method which
permits corrective information to be rapidly generated; the provision of
such a method of which permits baseline correction to be determined
substantially independently of other possible variables; the provision of
such a method may be implemented with existing equipment; and the
provision of such a method which is relatively simple and inexpensive.
Other objects and features will be in part apparent and in part pointed
out hereinafter.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Briefly, the present invention is applicable to a microlithographic system
for optically projecting circuit patterns on semiconductor wafers in which
alignment between successive exposures is provided by means of a
microscope mounted to one side of the optical projection column, there
being a metered stage for transporting a wafer between the microscope and
the optical projection column. A wafer provided with a light sensitive
coating is placed on the stage and is transported to the projection column
using an approximate baseline value for metering movement of the stage. At
the image plane of the column, the wafer is exposed from a reticle which
includes fiducial markings. Without removing the wafer from the stage, it
is then transported to the microscope and, by observing the latent image
on the coating, the actual stage movement required to align the latent
image of the fiducial markings on the wafer with the microscope reticle is
measured. Then the base line value is corrected based on this actual
measurement.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a diagramatic side view of a microlithographic system of a type
to which the method of the present invention is applicable;
FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a preferred way of practicing the method of the
present invention;
FIG. 3 is a diagramatic illustration of a projection reticle pattern useful
in the practice of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a diagramatic illustration of an alignment microscope system
reference reticle pattern useful in the practice of the present invention;
and FIG. 5 is a diagramatic illustration of a production reticle pattern
useful in the practice of another form of the present invention.
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout
the several views of the drawings.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring now to FIG. 1, the microlithographic system illustrated there is
adapted for the manufacturer of semiconductor circuits by projecting
circuit patterns onto a semiconductor wafer coated with a light sensitive
resist.
A preferred type of apparatus for the practice of the present invention is
the microlithographic step and repeat system manufactured and sold by the
GCA Corporation of Bedford, Mass., under the trademark DSW, and designated
by it as the GCA 6300/B fitted with the AWA II alignment system and high
contrast microscope. This is a direct step on a wafer type of machine
which typically exposes a wafer with a repeated pattern by stepping the
wafer at the image plane of the projection column.
In FIG. 1 the platen which is provided to hold a reticle at the object
plane of the projection column is indicated by reference character 11,
while a chuck for holding a semiconductor wafer is indicated by reference
character 13. Chuck 13 is carried on an x-y stage 15 for movement which
allows a wafer held in a chuck to be moved outside of the optical
projection system for unloading and loading and for inspection under a
microscope, designated by reference character 17. For purposes of
simplification, the loading station is not shown in FIG. 1. Motion of the
stage 15 is provided by suitable servo motors, metering of the stage
movement being provided by a laser interferometer apparatus which detects
and measures movement for each orthagonal axis. In FIG. 1 the laser
interferometer for the X-axis is indicated by reference character 19.
In addition to the reticle holding platen, the optical projection column
includes a precision projection lens 21, a light source 23, and a
condenser lens 25 for directing light from the source 23, through the
reticle held in platen 11 into lens 21 and then down onto the wafer
surface. As is usual with systems of this type, operations of the
subcomponents of the GCA 6300/B machine are coordinated under computer
control. In particular, the computer control system can direct the stage
to certain XY coordinates and the servo system electronically causes the
stage to be traversed to that location, using information provided by the
laser interferometer system which tracks stage position.
As indicated previously, one of the parameters stored in and utilized by
the computer is the so-called base line value or vector, this being the
distance between the optical axis of the microscope and the optical axis
of the projection column. As with other parameters utilized in driving the
stage 15, the base line value contemplates both the X and the Y axis and
is thus a vector rather than a mere scalar value. In the operation of the
system, various vectors and locations, including the base line vector are
initially defined as a nominal value and then progressively updated,
starting from a simple physical measurement, progressing through various
prior art alignment techniques up to the system of the present invention.
In normal wafer production techniques, the wafer, after loading, is
transported to the microscope for alignment with previous layers and,
after alignment, is moved into the projection column for exposure, the
movement being predicated on the base line vector. In making the
calibration exposure, in accordance with the practice of the method of the
present invention, however, the wafer may be moved directly from the
loading station to the projection column. It will be understood by those
skilled in the art, however, that this movement is still based or
predicated upon the stored base line vector, this vector, whether
approximate or accurate, being used in calculations to achieve the actual
movement of the stage to arrive at the desired destination.
In accordance with the practice of the present invention, laid out in a
step wise fashion in FIG. 2, a wafer provided with a light sensitive
coating is loaded into the stage 15 and is moved into approximate
alignment with the projection column using an approximate baseline vector
in the movement calculations.
While thusly positioned at the nominal axis of the projection column, the
coated wafer is exposed from a reference radial including various fiducial
markings. A preferred form of such markings is shown in simplified fashion
in FIG. 3. As may be seen in FIG. 3, the pattern includes a series of
similar markings, one at the center of the reticle field and eight around
the perimeter of the reticle, one at each 45 degree angular increment. For
the purpose of initial base line correction, the central marking is of
principle interest.
In accordance with the practice of the present invention, the coated wafer
is exposed at a sufficient intensity or time to produce a latent image
which is in fact visible. In one aspect the present invention involves the
discovery that certain lithographic resists exhibit a visible latent
image. In other words, even though the image has not been developed in
accordance with the usual manufacturing process, a change occurs which can
be observed. This change is believed to be due to bleaching of the
materials used. Polymer type positive resist appears to be particularly
useful in this regard, one particular resist being the AZ 1470 resist
available from the Shipley Company of Newton, MA. While the bleaching
effect is relatively slight, e.g. producing a contrast ratio of only about
7 percent, the change can be observed with the use of a high contrast
microscope. The effect is in fact sufficient to permit either visual
observation or observation through a video camera such as that typically
employed in wafer align systems such as the AWA II referenced previously.
After exposure, the wafer is transported on the XY stage to the microscope
17. Initially this movement is predicated on the approximate base line
vector, i.e., to bring the latent image of the central fiducial mark
within the operative field of the microscope. However, further movement of
the stage is provided to bring the latent image of the central fiducial
mark into exact registration with the microscope reticle, the movement at
all time being tracked by the laser interferometer system. A preferred
form of pattern for a microscope reticle which facilitates aligning of the
latent image fiducial marking is illustrated in FIG. 4. Preferably,
illumination at the microscope is provided by a light source which is
filtered to minimize further exposure of the light sensitive coating.
The movement to bring about exact registration may be either manually
controlled or under the servo control of an electronic wafer alignment
system. e.g., the AWA II system. This additional movement is then applied
by the computer as a correction to the stored base line vector so that an
updated or highly exact value for the base line vector is obtained. This
initialized or calibrated value can then be utilized in actual production
where wafers, having had an initial pattern applied and developed, are
upon introduction to the system, first brought into postion under the
microscope 17 for alignment and are then transferred to a postion under
the projection column for further printing using the updated and refined
base line vector.
If desired, the method of the present invention can also be performed
periodically during production runs by bringing wafers back to the
microscope after exposure, e.g. to perform "on the fly" checking of
alignment.
In addition to base line correction, the alignment technique of the present
invention may also be used to facilitate the rapid correction of various
other alignment registration and overlay parameters during the wafer
fabrication process. Referring to FIG. 5, a reticle pattern is shown which
includes four fiducial markings, similar to those in FIG. 3, in addition
to rectangular integrated circuit patterns 55. As is understood by those
skilled in the art, the circuit patterns are normally rectangular, both
individually and in assemblage suitable for step and repeat
microlithography, while the useful field of the projection lens 21 is
circular. Thus the fiducial marks 55 are conveniently located in the
normally unused areas of the field outside the chordal lines which define
the rectangular circuit pattern area.
By exposing the coated wafer with such a fiducial mark pattern and then
transporting the wafer on the stage using nominal stored vectors to put
each of these fiducial marks in succession within the field of a
microscope 17, error or offset values may be obtained for each mark. By
mathematically combining or finding the center of the these marks, a value
corresponding to the nonexistent central fiducial mark can be obtained and
the base line vector can thereby be updated even during a run of
production wafers. Further, to the extent that the individual errors or
offsets do not correspond to the ideal values, computational analysis can
determine the cause of the deviation from among various possible effects.
Corrections may be made in the magnification ratio for the projection
column or corrections may be made in the position of the reticle itself if
errors in that position have produced a rotated or skewed (trapezoidal)
dislocation of the corresponding latent images on the wafer surface.
If, for example, the reticle held in platen 11 is not perfectly parallel to
the wafer held in chuck 13 or if the lens axis is not perfectly
orthogonal, the image on the wafer may be slightly trapezoidal. This
deviation from rectangular will show up in the offset values determined by
measuring the distance actually required to position the corresponding
fiducial components of the latent image in alignment with the reticle in
the microscope. Based on this information corrections may be made, either
manually or under servo control, in the positioning of the platen and
reticle. Likewise, if the reticle has been somewhat rotated in the platen
11, corresponding offsets will occur in the measurements taken when the
corresponding fiducial marks are aligned with the microscope so that
corrective action may be taken. In this case the corrective action may be
performed either by correction of the position of the radical or by
producing a compensating rotation of the wafer since the chucks employed
for holding such wafers typically include a provision for small angular
rotations to achieve initial alignment.
In view of the foregoing, it may be seen that several objects of the
present invention are achieved and other advantageous results have been
attained.
As various changes could be made in the above constructions without
departing from the scope of the invention, it should be understood that
all matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying
drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
* * * * *
|
|
|
|
|
Description  |
|