|
|
|
| United States Patent | 4642505 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/4642505.html |
| Inventor(s) | Arvanitis; Aristotelis S. (Addison, IL) |
| Abstract | An improved method of adjusting piezoelectric devices to frequency by
particularized laser trimming is disclosed. The laser removes a single
contiguous area in the center of the electrodes to appropriately increase
the individual resonator frequency without significantly degrading the
filter "Q". In an AT-cut monolithic crystal filter, the particularized
laser trimmed area can be positioned such on the face of the electrodes to
simultaneously control frequency and bandwidth. This method can be
substituted for the more cumbersome process of frequency adjustment by
vapor deposition to provide a rapid inexpensive technique for monolithic
crystal filter manufacture. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing from US Patent 4642505 |
|
|
Laser trimming monolithic crystal filters to frequency |
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
February 10, 1987 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
March 5, 1984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 3535778
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4562370 Von Dach 310/312 Dec,1985 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4468582 Fujiwara 310/312 Aug,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4455500 Savit 310/312 Jun,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4447753 Ochiai 310/312 May,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4418299 Momosaki 310/361 Nov,1983 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4379244 Dinger 310/312 Apr,1983 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4346537 Masujima 451/5 Aug,1982 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4259563 Madeley 219/121.69 Mar,1981 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4218631 Yamaguchi 310/312 Aug,1980 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4211947 Ikeno 310/312 Jul,1980 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4184062 Schmidt 219/121.6 Jan,1980 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4179310 Compton 438/186 Dec,1979 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4169976 Cirri 219/121.72 Oct,1979 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4131484 Caruso 134/1 Dec,1978 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4081653 Koo 219/121.68 Mar,1978 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4062154 Huguenin 451/2 Dec,1977 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3913195 Beaver 29/25.35 Oct,1975 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3781577 Nonaka 310/365 Dec,1973 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3766616 Staudte 29/25.35 Oct,1973 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3683213 Juergen H. Staudte (Anaheim, CA) 310/312 Aug,1972 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
|
|
|
| Market Size |
|
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market
sector:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Market Share |
|
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Reasonable Royalty |
|
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
|
| | |
| |
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
|
| Market Size | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Market Share | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Reasonable Royalty | N/A | [No votes] |
| | N/A | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Technical Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed is:
1. An improved method of adjusting the resonant frequency of a
piezoelectric device having a plurality of electrodes positioned on
opposing surfaces of a crystal wafer to form at least one piezoelectric
resonator, including the steps of:
laser machining the electrode material from the respective resonator
electrode to adjust the frequency of said resonator to a desired value,
said laser machining being effected in the approximate geometric center of
said electrode in a single contiguous area manner, whereby the Q of said
piezoelectric device is minimally affected by said laser machining.
2. The method as described in claim 1, wherein said single contiguous area
manner of laser machining is generated by an outwardly spiralling path of
partially overlapping holes.
3. The method as described in claim 2, wherein said lasered holes are
partially overlapping in both the X and Y directions.
4. The method as described in claim 3, wherein said lasered holes are
approximately one mil in diameter.
5. The method as described in claim 1, wherein said laser machining removes
electrode material from both electrodes positioned on opposing sides of
said crystal wafer substantially simultaneously with a single laser
machining operation.
6. The method as described in claim 1, wherein said piezeoelectric device
crystal wafer is comprised of AT-cut quartz.
7. The method as described in claim 1, wherein said piezeoelectric device
is a monolithic crystal filter.
8. An improved method of adjusting the resonant frequency of a monolithic
crystal filter device having a plurality of electrodes positioned on
opposing surfaces of a crystal wafer to form at least two
acoustically-coupled piezoelectric resonators, including the steps of:
laser machining the electrode material from the respective resonator
electrode to adjust the frequency of said resonator to a desired value,
said laser machining being effected in a single contiguous area manner but
at a location shifted from the geometric center of said electrode so as to
alter the inter-resonator coupling between said resonators, whereby the Q
of said monolithic crystal filter device is minimally affected by said
laser machining.
9. The method as described in claim 8, wherein said laser machining being
effected at a location shifted toward the inter-resonator gap to narrow
the bandwidth of said monolithic crystal filter.
10. The method as described in claim 8, wherein said laser machining being
affected at a location shifted away from the inter-resonator gap to widen
the bandwidth of said monolithic crystal filter.
11. The method as described in claim 8, wherein said single contiguous area
manner of laser machining is generated by an outwardly spiralling path of
partially overlapping holes.
12. The method as described in claim 11, wherein said lasered holes are
partially overlapping in both the X and Y directions.
13. The method as described in claim 12, wherein said lasered holes are
approximately one mil in diameter.
14. The method as described in claim 8, wherein said laser machining
removes electrode material from both electrodes positioned on opposing
sides of said crystal wafer substantially simultaneously with a single
laser machining operation.
15. The method as described in claim 8, wherein said monolithic crystal
filter device wafer is comprised of AT-cut quartz.
16. An improved method of adjusting the frequency difference between a
predetermined pair of acoustically-coupled resonators of a monolithic
crystal filter device having a singular common ground electrode covering
the inter-resonator coupling area on one surface of a crystal wafer and
individual electrodes on the opposing surface, including the steps of:
laser machining the electrode material from the respective resonator
electrode to adjust the frequency of said resonator to a desired value,
subsequently vapor depositing material onto said singular common ground
electrode to adjust the center frequency of said monolithic crystal filter
device,
said laser machining being effected in the approximate geometric center of
said individual electrode in a single contiguous area manner, whereby the
Q of said monolithic crystal filter device is minimally affected by said
laser machining.
17. The method as described in claim 16, wherein said laser machining being
effected upon the lower frequency resonator electrode of said
predetermined resonator pair to decrease the frequency difference between
said resonator pair.
18. The method as described in claim 16, wherein said laser machining being
effected upon the higher frequency resonator electrode of said
predetermined resonator pair to increase the frequency difference between
said resonator pair.
19. The method as described in claim 16, wherein said single contiguous
area manner of laser machining is generated by an outwardly spiralling
path of partially overlapping holes.
20. The method as described in claim 19, wherein said lasered holes are
partially overlapping in both the X and Y directions.
21. The method as described in claim 20, wherein said lasered holes are
approximately one mil in diameter.
22. The method as described in claim 16, wherein said laser machining
removes electrode material from both electrodes positioned on opposing
sides of said crystal wafer substantially simultaneously with a single
laser machining operation.
23. The method as described in claim 16, wherein said monolithic crystal
filter device wafer is comprised of AT-cut quartz.
24. A piezoelectric device adjusted to a desired frequency having minimally
affected Q, comprising:
a piezoelectric crystal wafer having two opposing major surfaces,
at least two electrodes, each of which is positioned on opposing surfaces
in an overlying relationship to form at least one piezoelectric resonator,
at least one electrode having a single contiguous area in the approximate
geometric center of said electrode, said contiguous area comprised of a
plurality of partially-overlapping laser-machined holes, whereby the Q of
said piezoelectric device is minimally affected by said laser machining.
25. A piezoelectric device as described in claim 24, wherein said
contiguous area has the maximum amount of electrode material removed from
within the perimeter of said area.
26. A piezoelectric device as described in claim 24, wherein said
laser-machined holes are partially overlapping in both the X and Y
directions.
27. A piezoelectric device as described in claim 24, wherein said
laser-machined holes are approximately one mil in diameter.
28. A piezoelectric device as described in claim 24, wherein both
electrodes positioned on opposing sides of said crystal wafer each have
said single contiguous area of approximately the same dimensions in
approximately the same location on each electrode.
29. A piezoelectric device as described in claim 24, wherein said
piezeoelectric device crystal wafer is comprised of AT-cut quartz.
30. A piezoelectric device as described in claim 24, wherein said
piezeoelectric device is a monolithic crystal filter.
31. A monolithic crystal filter device adjusted to a desired frequency
having minimally affected Q, comprising:
a piezoelectric crystal wafer having two opposing major surfaces,
a plurality of electrodes, each positioned on said opposing surfaces in an
overlying relationship to form at least two acoustically-coupled
piezoelectric resonators,
at least one electrode having a single contiguous area at a location
shifted from the geometric center of said electrode, said contiguous area
comprised of a plurality of partially-overlapping laser-machined holes,
whereby the inter-resonator coupling between said resonators has been
altered by said laser machining.
32. A monolithic crystal filter device as described in claim 31, wherein
said contiguous areas are positioned at a location shifted toward the
inter-resonator gap so as to narrow the bandwidth of said monolithic
crystal filter.
33. A monolithic crystal filter device as described in claim 31, wherein
said contiguous areas are positioned at a location shifted away from
inter-resonator gap so as to widen the bandwidth of said monolithic
crystal filter.
34. A monolithic crystal filter device as described in claim 31, wherein
said contiguous area has the maximum amount of electrode material removed
from within the perimeter of said area.
35. A monolithic crystal filter device as described in claim 31, wherein
said laser-machined holes are partially overlapping in both the X and Y
directions.
36. A monolithic crystal filter device as described in claim 31, wherein
said laser-machined holes are approximately one mil in diameter.
37. A monolithic crystal filter device as described in claim 31, wherein
both electrodes positioned on opposing sides of said crystal wafer each
have said single contiguous area of approximately the same dimensions in
approximately the same location on each electrode.
38. A monolithic crystal filter device as described in claim 31, wherein
said monolithic crystal filter device wafer is comprised of AT-cut quartz.
39. A monolithic crystal filter device adjusted to a desired frequency
having minimally affected Q, comprising:
a piezoelectric crystal wafer having two opposing major surfaces,
a singular common ground electrode covering the inter-resonator coupling
area on one surface of said crystal wafer,
at least two individual electrodes, both positioned on the opposing surface
of said wafer in an overlying relationship to said common ground electrode
to form a pair of acoustically-coupled piezoelectric resonators,
at least one individual electrode having a single contiguous area in the
approximate geometric center of said individual electrode, said contiguous
area comprised of a plurality of partially-overlapping laser-machined
holes, and
an additional layer of electrode material vapor-deposited onto said
singular common ground electrode, whereby the frequency difference between
said resonator pairs has been altered by said laser machining.
40. A monolithic crystal filter device as described in claim 39, wherein
said individual electrode having said contiguous area is part of the lower
frequency resonator of a predetermined resonator pair, whereby the
frequency difference between said resonator pair has been decreased by
said laser machining.
41. A monolithic crystal filter device as described in claim 39, wherein
said individual electrode having said contiguous area is part of the
higher frequency resonator of a predetermined resonator pair, whereby the
frequency difference between said resonator pair has been increased by
said laser machining.
42. A monolithic crystal filter device as described in claim 39, wherein
said contiguous area has the maximum amount of electrode material removed
from within the perimeter of said area.
43. A monolithic crystal filter device as described in claim 39, wherein
said laser-machined holes are partially overlapping in both the X and Y
directions.
44. A monolithic crystal filter device as described in claim 39, wherein
said laser-machined holes are approximately one mil in diameter.
45. A monolithic crystal filter device as described in claim 39, wherein
both electrodes positioned on opposing sides of said crystal wafer each
have said single contiguous area of approximately the same dimensions in
approximately the same location on each electrode.
46. A monolithic crystal filter device as described in claim 39, wherein
said monolithic crystal filter device wafer is comprised of AT-cut quartz.
47. The method as described in claim 1, wherein the frequency of said
resonator is adjusted on the order of kilohertz.
48. The method as described in claim 8, wherein the frequency of said
resonator is adjusted on the order of kilohertz.
49. The method as described in claim 16, wherein the frequency of said
resonator is adjusted on the order of kilohertz.
50. A piezoelectric device as described in claim 24, wherein said single
contiguous area is dimensioned such that the frequency of said device is
changed on the order of kilohertz.
51. A monolithic crystal filter device as described in claim 31, wherein
said single contiguous area is dimensioned such that the frequency of said
device is changed on the order of kilohertz.
52. A monolithic crystal filter device as described in claim 39, wherein
said single contiguous area is dimensioned such that the frequency of at
least one of said resonator pairs is changed on the order of kilohertz. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
FIELD OF INVENTION
The present invention relates to an improved method of adjusting
piezoelectric devices to frequency by laser beam machining, particularly
AT-cut quartz resonators as used in monolithic crystal filters.
DESCRIPTION OF PRIOR ART
Piezoelectric crystals, such as AT-cut quartz resonators, are well known
and widely used in the art, and are particularly applicable for use in
high frequency filters. One important concern in the crystal filter
industry is the adjustment of crystal resonators to the desired operating
frequency. Typically, this adjustment is accomplished by adding mass to
the crystal electrode through the process of vacuum deposition. This
time-consuming procedure involves the use of numerous masking steps which
must be performed in a contamination-free vacuum deposition chamber under
critical tolerance conditions. Monolithic crystal filters present further
production masking problems since the electrode dimension and
inter-resonator spacing must be accurately controlled to determine the
acoustic coupling. Recently, the laser has been used as a tool for
adjusting the frequency of piezoelectric resonators. J. L. Hokanson, in
his article entitled "Laser Machining Thin Film Electrode Arrays on Quartz
Crystal Substrates", published in the 23rd Annual Frequency Control
Symposium, May 1969, pp. 163-170, teaches the method of laser trimming
AT-cut quartz crystal electrode arrays for performing vernier adjustments
to both frequency and bandwidth of monolithic crystal filters, thereby
eliminating the above-mentioned masking steps. The frequency has been
adjusted upward by vaporizing a regularly-spaced array of holes called
"spot patterns" on the electrode surface, and the bandwidth has been
adjusted downward by removing electrode material from the edge of one
electrode and by removing bits of mass from a stripe of metal evaporated
between adjacent resonators. This "spot pattern" technique for removing
electrode material is not particularly suited for a large change in
frequency on the order of kilohertz, since the laser beam affects the
adhesion properties of the electrode material, creating a significant
accumulation of loosely-adhering particles surrounding the spot removed.
These particles change the electrical parameters of the piezoelectric
device, more specifically, the "Q" of the filter is substantially
degraded.
One proposed solution to this problem of "Q" degradation is disclosed by
Caruso, et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 4,131,484, entitled "Frequency Adjusting
a Piezoelectric Device by Lasering", which teaches the method of adjusting
the resonator frequency of a piezoelectric crystal by laser machining the
electrode while simultaneously overdriving the device at a high current
level to prevent lasered particles from accumulating on the device. This
practice of overdriving a piezoelectric resonator by operating at a high
current level causes distortion of the frequency response of the device,
which makes it difficult to retain control of the laser trimming process
as the desired frequency is approached. Therefore, this technique requires
the operator to sequentially reduce drive levels and decrease laser
machining levels, which reduces the "electronic cleaning" action desired,
to compensate for this distortion. Furthermore, it becomes increasingly
difficult to maintain other electrical parameters, such as high filter
"Q", when this technique is used to perform large adjustments to the
resonant frequency, since the desired cleaning action is sequentially
reduced allowing lasered particles to accumulate. Not only is the
referenced cleaning process complicated, but it is to be noted that the
"Q" of the crystal filter device is no way optimized since Caruso embodies
the same "spot pattern" technique as taught by Hokanson.
The prior art technique of adjusting the bandwidth of monolithic crystal
filters by removing portions of mass from the stripe of metal evaporated
between the electrodes for this purpose, or by removing material from the
edge of the electrode, has the inherent disadvantage that the
inter-resonator coupling can only be decreased with laser trimming.
Additionally, the crystal filter may exhibit a degredation in spurious
response attributed to the trimming stripe located between the electrodes.
A need, therefore, exists for improvement of processes for laser trimming
piezoelectric resonators to frequency for monolithic crystal filters. The
present invention is specifically directed to this improvement.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a method
for adjusting the frequency of piezoelectric resonators by laser trimming
the electrodes in a particular manner to appropriately increase the
frequency without significantly degrading the "Q" of the filter.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a method for
adjusting the bandwidth of a monolithic crystal filter in both increasing
or decreasing increments by laser trimming the electrodes.
A further object of the present invention is to provide an improved
manufacturing process to control the resonator frequency difference of the
monolithic crystal filter by particularized laser trimming of the
electrodes.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide an improved
monolithic crystal filter wherein the frequency and bandwidth have been
adjusted by laser trimming the electrodes in a particular manner such that
the degredation of "Q" is minimized.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to an improved method of adjusting the
resonant frequency of a piezoelectric device by laser machining the
electrodes in a particular manner such that there is an appropriate change
in resonator frequency without a significant change in the "Q" of the
filter. More specifically, the present invention discloses a method of
laser machining a piezoelectric device such that material is removed from
the approximate geometric center of the electrodes in a single "contiguous
area" pattern generated by overlapping holes in both the X and Y
directions.
In another aspect of the present invention, the particularized laser beam
machining pattern may be effected in a location different from the
geometric center of the electrodes so as to simultaneously adjust the
frequency and bandwidth of an acoustically-coupled monolithic crystal
filter. Moving the laser trimmed areas toward the inter-resonator gap has
the effect of decreasing the acoustic coupling, while moving the laser
trimmed areas away from the inter-resonator gap has the effect of
increasing the acoustic coupling, thereby demonstrating that the
monolithic crystal filter bandwidth can be either increased or decreased
during the laser trimming operation.
In still another aspect of the present invention, wherein a two-pole
acoustically-coupled monolithic crystal filter includes a singular common
ground electrode, the particularized laser beam machining pattern may
first be effected on only one electrode pair so as to adjust the resonator
frequency difference, followed by a conventional vapor deposition process
on the common ground electrode to adjust the filter center frequency. If
only the higher frequency resonator is laser trimmed, the frequency
difference will be increased, whereas if only the lower frequency
resonator is laser trimmed, the frequency difference will be decreased,
thereby demonstrating that the resonator frequency difference of a
two-pole monolithic crystal filter may be controlled by the laser trimming
operation.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The features of the present invention which are believed to be novel are
set forth with particularity in the appended claims. The invention,
together with further objects and advantages thereof, may best be
understood by reference to the following description taken in connection
with the accompanying drawings, in the several figures of which like
referenced numerals identify like elements, and in which:
FIG. 1 is a greatly-enlarged perspective view of one form of a two-pole
monolithic crystal filter illustrating the location of the electrode area
removed in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 2a is a planar view of a single resonator quartz wafer illustrating
the location of the electrode area removed in accordance with the prior
art;
FIG. 2b is a cross-sectional view taken generally across the line 2b--2b of
FIG. 2a;
FIG. 3 is an enlarged representation of the laser machined area of FIG. 2
in accordance with the prior art;
FIG. 4a is an enlarged representation of the laser machined area of FIG. 1
in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 4b is an alternate embodiment of the present invention illustrating
another enlarged representation of the laser machined area of FIG. 1.
FIGS. 5a, 5b and 5c are partial planar views of the monolithic crystal
filter wafer of FIG. 1 showing three variations of the positions of the
laser machined areas with respect to the inter-resonator gap;
FIG. 6 is a graphic representation of voltage vs. frequency (obtained by
the short-circuit method) of the two-pole monolithic crystal filter,
showing the relationship of the short-circuit bandwidth to the position of
the laser machined area of FIG. 5.
FIG. 7a is a partial planar view of a two-pole single-phase monolithic
crystal filter wafer showing the location of the laser machined area;
FIG. 7b is a cross-sectional view taken generally across the line 7b--7b of
FIG. 7a.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
FIG. 1 shows one form of a two-pole monolithic crystal filter 10 which is
illustrative of the location of the electrode area removed in accordance
with the method of this invention. The AT-cut quartz crystal wafer 12 is
securely attached to the metal header 14 by means of a plurality of
support leads 16 which extend through apertures in the metal header 14. At
least one of the support leads 16G is used for a ground terminal and is
electrically connected to the metal header 14; the other support leads 16S
which are electrically active are insulated from the metal header by means
of a glass insulating material 18. The quartz crystal wafer 12 has a
plurality of electrodes 20A, 20B, 22A, 22B of a suitable contact metal,
such as gold, vapor deposited or otherwise plated on opposite sides of
wafer 12 in a superimposed relationship to create piezoelectric resonators
20 and 22 separated by an inter-resonator gap 26. Each resonator 20, 22 is
initially designed to have a resonant frequency slightly below the desired
nominal value such that the desired resonant frequency may be achieved by
laser machining material from the electrodes. The present invention
teaches that the laser machined area 24 on the surface of each electrode
20A, 20B, 22A, 22B, be positioned in the geometric center of said
electrodes in a particular pattern which will subsequently be fully
described.
The laser machining apparatus for trimming electrodes on quartz crystals is
well known in the art; and, accordingly, a complete description of the
apparatus is not deemed necessary. It is to be noted, however, that the
laser beam wavelength is such that the quartz crystal is transparent to
the beam. Therefore, the electrode material on both surfaces of the quartz
wafer 12 will be vaporized nearly simultaneously by the laser beam with
only one laser machining operation performed on only one surface of the
wafer.
FIG. 2 illustrates the location of the electrode area removed in accordance
with that known in the prior art. FIG. 2a is a planar view, and FIG. 2b is
a cross-sectional view of a single resonator crystal 30 comprising a
quartz crystal wafer 32 and electrodes 34A, 34B, vapor deposited on both
sides of water 32. The shaded area 36 across the surface of only the front
electrode 34A represents the region in which the laser machining was
performed.
FIG. 3 is an enlarged diagram of the laser machined region 36 of FIG. 2 in
accordance with the prior art. This regularly-spaced array of separate
holes or "spot pattern" was generated by laser machining a row of 0.5 mil
diameter holes separated by 1.4 mils in each pass and then re-indexing at
the end of each pass by 2 mils and repeating this row to achieve the
larger region 36. Each time the laser beam strikes the electrode, a spot
of electrode material is vaporized; thus reducing the mass of the
electrode, thereby raising the frequency of the piezoelectric device.
However, electrode material at the circumference of the spot just removed
has been adversely affected by partial melting to form particles or tiny
beads of mass which remain loosely attached to the surface. If a large
change in resonator frequency is desired such as on the order of
kilohertz, this "spot pattern" technique creates a large accumulation of
loose particles which significantly affect the electrical parameters of
the piezoelectric device as observed by a substantial degradation of the
"Q" of the resonator. It is for this reason that the prior art "spot
pattern" technique was limited to extremely-fine frequency adjustments.
FIG. 4a is an enlarged diagram of the laser machined area 24 of FIG. 1 in
accordance with the present invention. The specific pattern generated by
the laser beam machining process is a single small "contiguous area"
produced by partially-overlapping holes in both the X and Y directions to
remove the maximum amount of electrode material within a given perimeter
of electrode surface area. This "contiguous area" pattern may be generated
by following the "outwardly-spiraling square" path shown in FIG. 4a and
described here: (a) the laser beam is positioned at the approximate
geometric center of the electrode and the first hole of approximately 1
mil in diameter is machined; (b) The beam is moved approximately one-half
the diameter of the hole produced or approximately 0.5 mil in the +Y
direction, and another hole is machined which partially overlaps the first
hole; (c) the beam is moved the same "step" of approximately 0.5 mil in
the -X direction, and another hole is machined which partially overlaps
the previous two holes; (d) the beam is moved the same step in the -Y
direction, and another hole is machined which partially overlaps the
previous three holes; (e) the beam is moved the same step again in the -Y
direction, and another hole is machined; (f through p) the same
outwardly-spiraling path illustrated in FIG. 4a is followed to produce the
desired "contiguous area" pattern of electrode material removed.
FIG. 4b is a modified version of the "outwardly-spiraling square" path of
FIG. 4a demonstrating another embodiment of the present invention. The
same "contiguous area" pattern of laser machining may alternately be
generated by following the path shown in FIG. 4b, wherein the laser beam
is moved in 0.707 mil "steps" to achieve the desired pattern of
partially-overlapping holes in both the X and Y directions. As
illustrated, the 0.707 mil "step" is the maximum distance between center
points of the laser machined holes that will remove all the electrode
material within the total outer perimeter of the laser machined area.
Thus, it becomes obvious that any increment may be used to position the
laser beam, provided that the increment is less than or equal to 0.707
times the diameter of the hole produced. Additionally, FIG. 4b shows that
either a clockwise or counter-clockwise spiral, initiated in any direction
from the first la | | |