|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed is:
1. In a data processing method employing more than one data processing
workstation in which workstations communicate therebetween, the
improvement for allowing an operator at a first workstation to cause the
utilization of one or more resources of a second workstation, comprising:
determining at said first workstation a specification of resources at said
second workstation which are authorized for utilization by said first
workstation;
displaying at said second workstation, upon actual utilization of one or
more of said resources at said second workstation by said first
workstation, an indication of said utilization of one or more of said
resources;
determining, in the event of an operator logging off said second
workstation, if said one or more resources of said second workstation are
being utilized by said first workstation; and then
displaying an indication at said second workstation that the second
workstation should be maintained in an on state because of utilization of
said one or more resources of said second workstation by said first
workstation.
2. In the data processing method of claim 1 further comprising:
displaying, at a workstation according to said specification of resources
and according to whether or not an operator is logged on at said second
workstation, a message indicating required operator service for one of
said resources at said second workstation.
3. In the data processing method of claim 2 further comprising:
displaying an indication at said second workstation, in the event of
required operator service for one of said resources at said second
workstation being utilized by said first workstation, and in the event
that an operator is logged on at said second workstation, of said required
operator service.
4. In the data processing method of claim 3 further comprising:
displaying an indication at a workstation other than said second
workstation, in the event of required operator service for one of said
resources at said second workstation being utilized by said first
workstation, and in the event that an operator is not logged on at said
second workstation, of said required operator service.
5. In the data processing method of claim 4 further comprising:
displaying an indication at said first workstation, in the event of
required operator service for one of said resources at said second
workstation being utilized by said first workstation, and in the event
that an operator is not logged on at said second workstation, of said
required operator service.
6. In the data processing method of claim 1 further comprising:
displaying at said second workstation, in the event that an operator at
said second workstation attempts a soft power down at said workstation
while said one or more resources of said second workstation are being
utilized by said first workstation, an indication asking the operator if
the power down process should continue; and
continuing the power down process upon an affirmative response by said
operator at said second workstation.
7. In a data processing system employing more than one data processing
workstation in which workstations communicate therebetween, the
improvement for allowing an operator at a first workstation to cause the
utilization of one or more resources of a second workstation, comprising:
means for determining at said first workstation a specification of
resources at said second workstation which are authorized for utilization
by said first workstation;
means for displaying at said second workstation, upon actual utilization of
one or more of said resources at said second workstation by said first
workstation, an indication of said utilization of one or more of said
resources;
means for determining, in the event of an operator logging off said second
workstation, if said one or more resources of said second workstation are
being utilized by said first workstation; and
means for displaying an indication at said second workstation that the
second workstation should be maintained in an on state because of
utilization of said one or more resources of said second workstation by
said first workstation.
8. In the data processing system of claim 7 further comprising:
means for displaying, at a workstation according to said specification of
resources and according to whether or not an operator is logged on at said
second workstation, a message indicating required operator service for one
of said resources at said second workstation.
9. In the data processing system of claim 7 further comprising:
means for displaying at said second workstation, in the event that an
operator at said second workstation attempts a soft power down at said
workstation while said one or more resources of said second workstation
are being utilized by said first workstation, an indication asking the
operator if the power down process should continue; and
means for continuing the power down process upon an affirmative response by
said operator at said second workstation. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
DESCRIPTION
1. Technical Field
This invention relates generally to the sharing of resources associated
with intelligent workstations in data processing systems, and more
specifically to a technique for utilizing available workstation resorces
without requiring the knowledge or presence of an operator associated with
certain ones of the workstations having resources which are utilized.
2. Background Art (Prior Art Statement)
In data processing systems a traditional technique of utilizing system
resources has been to provide a central, host computer having a rather
large random access memory and one or more storage devices such as
flexible diskettes or hard disk files, as well as one or more printers.
Operator input to the system for entering data and supplying updating data
as well as commands to request that the desired data processing operations
take place has often been through remotely connected workstations.
Typically, such a workstation consisted of a keyboard and cathode ray tube
display combination. Necessary electronics were associated with these
workstation components to enable the display of the keyed data on the CRT
screen and also to enable two-way communication of the keyed data to the
central computer and from the central computer back to the CRT screen. It
is important to note, however, that very little, if any, data processing
took place at the workstation itself. Instead, data and task commands were
communicated from the workstation back to the central computer where the
data processing took place. The results of this data processing were then
communicated back to the workstation and, possibly, also to a printer or
storage device directly attached to the central computer. Such a printer
may have been, alternatively, associated with the workstation.
As the evolution of computer technology has led to more compact and lower
cost data processing components, including, in particular, processors,
random access memories, and disk storage devices, there has been a trend
to include more and more of these components at the workstation location.
Thus, workstations including processors, random access memory, magnetic
media storage (and possibly a printer) are referred to as intelligent
workstations and are capable of performing some of the data processing
tasks at the workstations without utilizing the central computer for all
processing capability.
In some data processing configurations, for example, those primarily
configured to do text processing tasks and secondarily utilized for
numerical processing tasks, the trend toward the use of intelligent
workstations has evolved to the point that the central computer performs
only a limited amount of data processing and serves primarily to control
the sharing of its storage and printer resources, while the primary data
processing capability resides at the workstations. Such an arrangement,
nevertheless, provides a great deal of communications capability between
workstations.
The change from large, centralized data processing systems with
non-intelligent terminals to systems employing clusters of distributed
intelligent workstations has resulted in inefficient use of resources such
as processors, memory, storage files and I/O devices because of the
limited ability of one intelligent workstation to share resources with
another intelligent workstation. With the appearance of local area
networks a limited amount of sharing capability is now available. However,
with intelligent workstations a significant challenge is still present
with regard to the effective utilization of computer resources such as the
processing capability and random access memory and file storage available
in intelligent workstations throughout an establishment.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A technique is provided to effectively utilize the resources of a
workstation without requiring an operator to be present at that
workstation. Additionally, resources of a workstation can be shared with
other workstations even if an operator is actively using the workstation
containing the resources to be shared, when it is determined that the
workstation has excess resources beyond those needed by the applications
being invoked by the operator.
More particularly this invention allows an operator at a first workstation
to cause a queue of jobs to be started at a second workstation if no
operator is actively using (logged onto) the second workstation.
Additionally, if an operator is logged onto the second workstation,
resources beyond those needed for the jobs being processed by the operator
on the second workstation can be utilized by the operator of the first
workstation. Messages are displayed on the screen of the second
workstation to warn anyone who might power off the machine that jobs are
running on that workstation, even though it may be the case that no
operator is logged onto the second workstation.
With this technique a queue of jobs waiting for resources to process the
queue can be automatically started when the system identifies a powered on
workstation having the resources needed to run the queue before an
operator is logged onto that workstation.
The foregoing and other objects, features, extensions, and advantages of
the invention will be apparent from the following more particularly
description of preferred embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in
the accompanying drawing.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a flow diagram showing the logic required when a workstation is
powered on.
FIG. 2 is a flow diagram showing the logic required when an interactive
user logs off.
FIG. 3 is a flow diagram showing the logic required to perform soft power
down.
FIG. 4 is a system diagram of the operating environment of this invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
For a description of the operating environment of this invention reference
is made to the system diagram of FIG. 4. This drawing figure shows only
prior art hardware elements which were available and connected as shown
prior to the filing of this application. For example, see U.S. patent
applications, Ser. Nos. 292,081 and 292,070, both filed Aug. 12, 1981, now
U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,437,093 and 4,460,957, respectively, both assigned to the
assignee of this application, which show configurations including elements
such as those described hereinafter which are similarly connected.
Workstations 40, 70 and 80 are connected to a communications link 61. The
communications link is shown as a ring in this example, although other
forms of communications such as the star or multi-drop configurations are
well known to those skilled in the art and may be used with this invention
in place of the ring shown here. Each of the workstations 40, 70 and 80
may comprise, for example, the IBM Personal Computer XT or any number of
other terminals with input/output devices well known to those skilled in
the art. The workstation 40 is shown in more detail as an example of the
architecture that any of the workstations may take, although it is
important to note that it is not necessary that the workstations be alike,
but simply that the workstations include resources beyond those always
necessary to do some of the types of jobs that they are called upon to do.
Workstation 40 comprises a microprocessor which may, for example, be an
Intel 8088 microprocessor. Microprocessor 42 is connected to a
data/address/control bus 41. A keyboard 43, a display 44, a diskette drive
45, a memory 46, a read-only memory 47, a printer 48, and a fixed disk
storage 49 are connected to the bus 41 through adapters 51-57,
respectively. Additionally, a communications adapter 58 is also connected
to the bus 41 and this communications adapter is connected to the
communications link 61 through a cable 50. Similarly, cables 51 and 52
connect workstations 80 and 70, respectively, to the communications link
61. Element 90 in FIG. 4 denotes an operator which may log a workstation,
such as workstation 70, onto the communications link 61 for active use of
other resources connected to the link 61, as explained hereinafter.
Each of the elements of workstation 40 are prior art devices available from
the International Business Machines Corporation in association with the
IBM Personal Computer XT. Some of the devices such as the diskette drive
45, memory 46, and read-only memory 47 and adapters 53-55 therefore are
included with the computer as purchased, although additional memory may be
added by the purchaser. Other ones of the devices and adapters, such as
the display 44, printer 48 and adapters 52 and 56, respectively, may be
purchased separately from the International Business Machines Corporation
for installation in the computer.
Within the read-only memory 47 are stored a plurality of instructions,
known as the basic input/output operating system, or BIOS, for execution
by the microprocessor 42. The BIOS controls the fundamental operations of
the computer. An operating system is loaded into the memory 46 and runs in
conjunction with the BIOS stored in the read-only memory 47. Accordingly,
in view of FIG. 4, those skilled in the art will readily understand that
the workstations connected to the communications link 61 may typically
include a number of devices, the use of which would be greatly
advantageous to the other workstations when those devices are not
presently needed to their fullest extent at the workstation to which they
are directly attached.
For a detailed description of the invention, reference is first made to
FIG. 1. This figure shows the logical steps executed when a workstation is
powered on. The first step at block 1 is the initial program load of the
operating system. Any necessary hardware diagnostics are performed during
this step and after the initial program load the operating system takes
over management of the workstation.
Next, at block 2 the operating system determines which profile is to be
executed at power on. This profile can contain many specifications
required for system operation. Only those specifications which are
relevant to this invention are discussed in the present context, such as
servers to be started, jobs to be automatically initiated, and devices or
memory to be reserved for the interactive user.
For the purposes of this description a server is a program or portion of a
program which allows an application such as printing or storing and
retrieving from a file to take place. Additionally, the server software
includes a queuing function capable of taking a request to execute the
application, knowing where the request came from, starting the application
when able and sending a reply back to the requester when the application
is complete or when it is clear that the application cannot be completed.
This additional function of the server is automatic and non-interactive,
as is well known to those skilled in the art.
Additionally for this description workstation resources which may be shared
include, but are not limited to memory and processor cycles and I/O
devices including disks, diskettes, printers, and communications ports.
Next, at block 3 the operating system checks to see if any servers are to
be started. If so, at block 4 servers are activated. This allows for
sharing of the allowable excess resources specified to be shared, without
requiring an operator to be present on the server workstation to initiate
the server. More specifically, a printer can be made available for use by
any other workstation. The server to which the printer is connected will
accept requests for service from other workstations on a local area
network to which the server for the printer is connected, from a
teleprocessing line to which the server is connected, as well as locally.
All requests are handled the same regardless of their origin. Requests
from any of the sources can be serviced without the presence of an
operator at the server workstation.
After the servers are activated (if any were requested), at block 5 the
operating system then checks to see if any jobs are specified for
auto-initiation. This is particularly useful for communications jobs. An
electronic mail application, for example, may be started at block 6. This
application can request all mail be delivered so that when the users log
onto the system the desired mail will already be available. Job initiation
requests can subsequently be received from workstations on the local area
network, from the teleprocessing line, as well as locally. Again, all
requests are handled the same regardless of their origin.
In addition to initiating a job at power on, jobs may be initiated at a
particular time of day. This allows batch type jobs to be run at night
when no operator is present. For example, an inventory update can be run
after all of the day's input has been received. Then the inventory master
file can be backed up on a diskette.
A third specification in the power on profile is that of the workstation
resources reserved for an interactive user of the workstation if and when
a user logs onto that workstation. This parameter specifies how much
memory and/or what devices are not to be shared with other workstations.
This ensures that an interactive user can always log onto his or her
assigned workstation and perform his or her work. In other words, the
workstation's resources cannot be shared by other workstations to the
extent that the workstation becomes unusable to the interactive user.
Thus, at block 7 a message is displayed at a second workstation having
resources utilized by a first workstation, whether or not an operator is
logged onto the second workstation. The message will instruct anyone at
the second workstation not to turn off that workstation. The message will
also indicate whether or not an operator is logged onto the second
workstation.
Some devices which may be shared, in particular, a printer (and less
frequently, diskette drives), may require service or operator attention
when in use. At block 8 as long as no device service is required the jobs
are executed as described above. In the event it is necessary to post a
message regarding required device service, at block 9 a profile associated
with each server is addressed which specifies the device service message
routing. This profile may specify, but is not limited to, the workstation
that owns the resource, the user that initiated the job, a particular
user, or broadcast to all powered on workstations. More than one option
may be specified. If the first option does not provide service for the
device, the second and succeeding options will be tried until all options
are exhausted. The operating system then returns to the first option in a
continuing attempt to communicate to an appropriate operator the
requirement for device service. It is important to note that the message
routing routine is responsive to whether or not workstations have users
logged on. Thus, in some cases a message waiting to be serviced might
appear or disappear on particular workstation displays as users log on or
off of workstations before the message is responded to.
FIG. 2 shows the steps performed when an interactive user logs off of a
workstation, as indicated at block 20. At block 21 the operating system
will check to see if there are any servers active or if there are any jobs
currently in execution. If not, at block 22 the workstation displays a
message indicating that no active jobs or queues remain to be processed.
If servers and/or jobs are active, at block 23 a message is displayed on
the workstation informing any potential users of that workstation of the
activity and not to power off the workstation. This message remains on the
display until another interactive user logs onto that workstation or until
all resources being utilized at that workstation are released.
Device service messages which would have been routed to the user who just
logged off will now be routed to the next option in the device service
list. Therefore, as mentioned above, at block 24 a device service table
may be set up so that if an operator is present on the server workstation,
that operator receives the device service message. Otherwise, it is routed
to another specified location.
FIG. 3 shows the steps performed when a user initiates soft power down, as
indicated at block 31. Soft power down can be implemented in one of two
ways. First the hardware can be implemented to pass control to the
operating system whenever the power off switch is pressed. Or, secondly, a
software command can be provided. At block 32 the operating system checks
to see if there are any servers active or if there are any jobs currently
in execution. If not, at block 33 the power down request is honored. If
servers and/or jobs are active, at block 34 the operating system will
display a message asking if power off is still requested. At block 35 if
the request is continued, all jobs are ended as soon as possible, as
indicated at block 36. After all jobs have finished the power is turned
off on the workstation. If not requested, at block 37 the workstation
continues execution as normal.
This allows the user to queue the activity at a workstation in an orderly
fashion with a minimum of actions required by the user. It also prevents
the user from inadvertently powering off the workstation when it would
cause abnormal termination of jobs.
The following programming design language of Appendix A is another form of
the above description of this invention. The listing parallels the
operation described above relative to FIGS. 1-3.
##SPC1##
In summary, a technique has been shown to effectively utilize the
processor, memory, and I/O resources of a workstation without requiring an
operator to be present at that workstation. Additionally, resources of
that workstation can be shared with other workstations even if an operator
is actively using the workstation containing the resources to be shared.
Thus, an operator at a first workstation can cause a queue of jobs to be
started at a second workstation, whether or not an operator is logged onto
the second workstation, if the second workstation includes sufficient
resources to assist in the jobs queued by the operator of the first
workstation. The invention provides for the display of messages on
affected workstations if the resources of those workstations are being
utilized beyond the use by the local, logged on operator. The invention
also provides for the display of device service messages in a manner that
best assures the attention of an operator assigned to service the device.
A routine is also included to require an additional decision by the
operator to power down the workstation when resources of the workstation
are being utilized by other workstations for active jobs.
While the invention has been shown and described with reference to
particular embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in
the art that the foregoing and other changes in form and details may be
made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
* * * * *
|
|
|
|
|
Description  |
|