|
|
|
| United States Patent | 4797614 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/4797614.html |
| Inventor(s) | Nelson; Roger E. (Northridge, CA) |
| Abstract | A meter for sheet conductance measurements does not touch the conductive
surface of a sample. A probe having a resonant tank coil is positioned
against a parallel supporting surface of the sample, which may be flat or
curved and of unrestricted area. An oscillator incorporating the tank coil
is controlled to stabilize oscillator amplitude in response to eddy
current loading by the sample. An electrostatic shield in a finger
configuration prevents capacitive coupling between the tank coil and the
sample without hindering magnetic coupling. A readout of sheet conductance
is driven by the oscillator control. Direct current can be coupled to the
tank coil for temperature control preventing undesired resistance changes
in the tank coil. The oscillator can be controlled by an optically coupled
variable gain element. Measurements can be made with the tank coil up to
at least 0.75 inch from the conductive surface of the sample. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing from US Patent 4797614 |
|
|
Apparatus and method for measuring conductance including a temperature
controlled resonant tank circuit with shielding |
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
January 10, 1989 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
April 20, 1987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parent Case |
This application is a continuation, of application Ser. No. 667,537, filed
Dec. 3, 1984, abandoned. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
|
|
|
| Market Size |
|
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market
sector:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Market Share |
|
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Reasonable Royalty |
|
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
|
| | |
| |
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
|
| Market Size | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Market Share | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Reasonable Royalty | N/A | [No votes] |
| | N/A | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Technical Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed is:
1. A method for measuring conductance of a sample comprising the steps of:
(a) selecting apparatus comprising:
(i) a resonant tank circuit having a tank coil for loading by the sample;
(ii) an oscillator incorporating the tank circuit;
(iii) a control circuit for the oscillator responsive to the loading of the
tank coil by the sample, the control circuit producing a control signal
proportional to the loading; and
(iv) means responsive to the control signal for indicating the sheet
conductance;
(b) coupling a variable direct current to the tank coil;
(c) measuring the magnitude of the direct current;
(d) measuring an offset voltage produced in the tank coil by the direct
current;
(e) dividing the measured offst voltage by the measured direct current for
producing a resistance signal representing the resistance of the tank
coil;
(f) controlling the direct current in response to the resistance signal for
stabilizing the temperature of the tank coil;
(g) positioning the tank coil in a predetermined relation to the sample;
and
(h) reading the sheet conductance from the indicating means.
2. Apparatus capable of measuring sheet conductance of a sample having
unrestricted area and having a conducting surface and a supporting surface
parallel to the conducting surface, the supporting surface being more than
0.15 inch from the conducting surface, the apparatus not touching the
conducting surface, the apparatus comprising:
(a) a probe comprising:
(i) a tank coil in a resonant tank circuit, the tank coil having an axis;
(ii) means for locating the probe against the supporting surface of the
sample with the axis of the tank coil perpendicular to the sample and a
predetermined distance between the tank coil and the sample;
(iii) a conductive housing for the tank coil, the conductive housing being
open at one end proximate the sample, the conductive housing shielding
magnetic flux associated with the tank coil not directed toward the
sample; and
(iv) a shield for preventing capacitive coupling between the tank coil and
the sample, the shield comprising a plurality of separate, elongated
narrow conductors on opposite sides of an insulating substrate covering
the open end of the housing, the conductors crossing to form an
intersecting pattern, the conductors being electrically connected to the
housing at one location only on each conductor for preventing eddy current
losses in the shield, for providing an electrostatic shield enclosing the
coil;
(b) an oscillator incorporating the tank circuit in resonance, the
oscillator further comprising a high frequency operational amplifier
having optically coupled gain for external control;
(c) means for controlling the temperature of the tank coil by varying a
direct current added to the tank coil in response to changes in measured
resistance of the tank coil, the controlling means comprising:
(i) a DC coupling network for adding the direct current to the tank coil,
the network having a coupler output connected to the tank coil, the
network incorporating a circuit for sensing an offset voltage at the
coupler output, the offset voltage resulting from the direct current in
the tank coil, the sensing circuit including means for blocking oscillator
signals;
(ii) a power amplifier for variably producing the direct current in
response to an external signal;
(iii) meane for measuring the magnitude of the direct current; and
(iv) a circuit for producing the external signal for the power amplifier as
a quotient proportional to the offset voltage divided by the magnitude of
the direct current, the external signal being indicative of the measured
resistance, the direct current being reduced in response to increased
resistance of the tank coil;
(d) a control circuit for the oscillator responsive to loading of the tank
coil by the conducting surface, the control circuit stabilizing the
amplitude of oscillation of the oscillator and producing a control signal
proportional to the loading; and
(e) means responsive to the control signal for indicating the sheet
conductance.
3. Apparatus for measuring conductance of a sample comprising:
(a) a resonant tank circuit having a tank coil for loading by the sample,
the tank coil having an axis;
(b) means for positioning the tank coil in a predetermined relation to the
sample;
(c) an oscillator incorporating the tank circuit;
(d) a control circuit for the oscillator responsive to the loading of the
tank coil by the sample, the control circuit stabilizing the amplitude of
oscillation of the oscillator and producing a control signal proportional
to the loading;
(e) means for controlling the temperature of the tank coil by coupling a
variable direct current into the tank coil, the direct current varying in
response to a circuit for measuring the resistance of the tank coil so
that the direct current is reduced when the resistance of the tank coil
increases; and
(f) means responsive to the control signal for indicating the conductance.
4. The apparatus of claim 3 wherein the means for controlling the
temperature comprises:
(a) a D.C. coupling network for adding the direct current to the tank coil,
the coupling network being connected in the tank circuit;
(b) a power amplifier for variably producing the direct current in response
to a resistance signal, the power amplifier being connected to the
coupling network;
(c) means for measuring a voltage offset in the tank coil in response to
the direct current;
(d) means for measuring the magnitude of the direct current; and
(e) means for producing the resistance signal as a quotient proportional to
the voltage offset divided by the direct current.
5. The apparatus of claim 4 in which the measuring means comprises a
low-pass filter in the D.C. coupling network, the filter having an output
connected to an input of a voltage amplifier, the voltage amplifier
driving the producing means, and the current measuring means comprises a
current-shunt resistor connected between the power amplifier and the
coupling network, opposite ends of the current-shunt resistor being
connected to corresponding inputs of a sensing amplifier, the sensing
amplifier having an output connected to the producing means.
6. The apparatus of claim 3 further comprising a shield for preventing
capacitive coupling between the tank coil and the sample, the shield being
located in fixed relation to the tank coil and comprising a plurality of
separate elongated narrow conductors, the conductors being electrically
interconnected only at one location on each conductor for preventing eddy
current losses in the shield.
7. The apparatus of claim 6 wherein the control circuit is in an
electronics unit and the tank coil, the shield and the positioning means
are in a probe remote from the electronics unit for convenient
manipulation of the tank coil.
8. The apparatus of claim 7 wherein the probe is connected to the
electronics unit by a coaxial cable more than about two feet long.
9. The apparatus of claim 3 wherein the oscillator further comprises a high
frequency operational amplifier circuit having optically coupled gain
control driven by the control signal.
10. The apparatus of claim 6 further comprising a conductive housing for
the tank coil, the conductive housing being open at one end proximate to
the sample, the conductive housing shielding magnetic flux associated with
the tank coil not directed toward the sample, the open end of the housing
being covered by the shield for preventing capacitive coupling, the
interconnection of the conductors being electrically connected to the
conductive housing for providing an electrostatic shield enclosing the
coil.
11. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein the conductors of the shield for
preventing capacitive coupling form at least two closely spaced surfaces,
the conductors of the respective surfaces being oriented to form an
intersecting pattern on opposite sides of an insulating substrate. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND
This invention relates to electrical conductance measurements, and more
particularly to noncontact sheet conductance measurements.
Non-contact conductance measurements based on the loading effects of a
sample on the "Q" of a nearby coil are known in the prior art. Sheet
conductance (G.sub.s) in units of Siemens per unit square is the inverse
of sheet resistance (R.sub.s) in units of ohms per unit square.
The analyses of these loading effects are quite complex, involving the
concepts of alternating magnetic fields, magnetic coupling, mutual
inductance, vector descriptions of induced currents and their interactions
with their associated magnetic fields. When concerned with the
interactions of time varying magnetic fields on conductive or
semi-conductive objects or surfaces, the subject is generally lumped into
the concept of "eddy currents". Eddy currents are induced in the object by
the magnetic field. The resulting losses and interactive magnetic field
are reflected back into the driving inductor. These are seen as the
changes in the resistive and inductive components of the impedance of the
coil. The figure of merit Q is defined as the ratio of the reactive to the
resistive impedance components of a coil at a given frequency. Thus the
reflection of eddy current losses from a sample conductor to a coil
influences the Q of the coil.
The change in Q depends on the conductivity of the sample and the proximity
of the sample to the coil. The magnitude of the eddy current loading
effect is very sensitive to the distance between the sensor coil and a
conductive surface. Therefore, means must be provided to establish a
definite positional relationship between the sensor and the conductive
surface of a sample.
The prior art includes devices for determining resistivities by
measurements of Q in combination with the use of non-linear calibration
curves of resistivity versus Q from samples of known resistivity. For
example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,234,461 to Trent et al discloses the use of a
commercial Q meter connected to a slotted coil with calibration curves
relating actual and relative Q to the resistivity of samples positioned
within the slot.
The prior art also includes U.S. Pat. No. 4,000,458 to Miller et al,
disclosing a method of measuring sheet conductance of a sample as a linear
function of the drive current required in a constant amplitude resonant
circuit loaded by the sample. The Miller patent describes a resonant coil
tightly coupled to both sides of the sample and magnetically shielded by
aluminum cups for confining the magnetic field to a defined area of the
sample. An electrostatic shield of conductive paper covers open ends of
the cups between the coil and the sample for minimizing capacitive
coupling to the sample.
Prior art non-contact sheet conductance and bulk conductivity meters are
commonly used for process control of semiconductor wafers and chips in the
microelectronics industry.
Another application for sheet conductance measurements is in the process
control of large area substrates having an applied conductive surface.
These conductive surfaces are often quite delicate and must not be
touched. The substrates can be panels spanning several feet and having
thicknesses of up to 3/4 inch (20 mm). The substrates can be made from a
non-conductive material such as glass or plastic.
The term "non-contact" has been used in the prior art to distinguish from
earlier prior art meter technology using a traditional four point probe to
establish direct electrical contact with the conductive surface of the
sample.
Usually, the sample is sandwiched in a slot within the coil or in a gap
between portions of the core. Consequently, both sides of the sample are
subject to being touched by the meter through normal handling procedures.
A successful commercial instrument identified as "M-gage 200" Metalization
Monitor", manufactured by Tencor Instruments Company is designed
specifically for semiconductor wafers. It provides for the positioning
requirement by incorporating a transport mechanism to support the wafer
and position it accurately between two sensor coils approximately 1/4 inch
apart. The sample wafers can have a maximum thickness of 0.120 inch.
A disadvantage of prior art non-contact conductivity meters is a
requirement for close proximity (less than 0.15 inch) of the conductive
surface to the sensor (a coil or a high permeability core tightly coupled
to the coil). In order to provide for exact and repeatable spacing of the
sensor to the sample, prior art meters usually compromise the non-contact
feature by requiring physical contact of some part of the sensor assembly
with the conductive surface of the sample in order to establish the
required exact spacing between the sensor and the sample.
A noncontact resistivity meter touching one side only of the sample is
disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 2,859,407 to Henisch. For samples comprising a
conductive material on a thick substrate, the conductive surface must face
the meter to be in close proximity to the coil for proper meter operation.
Therefore, unless the sample is very thin, the meter must touch the
conductive surface of the sample.
A further application for sheet conductance measurements is in the
manufacturing of panels having a conductive surface between thick
laminated substrates, such as for windshields. These panels are sometimes
curved. The prior art resistance meters are not suitable for this
application because the internal conductive surface cannot be in close
proximity to the coil.
A problem encountered in locating the conductive surface a distance from
the instrument is that an interposed conductive surface used as an
electrostatic shield, as described above, interferes with magnetic
coupling to the sample. The more remotely the sample is located from the
coil and the shield, the more dominantly the shield loads the resonant
circuit, rendering the instrument insensitive to the conductivity of the
sample.
Another disadvantage of prior art non-contact sheet conductance and bulk
conductivity meters is that they are not suitable for measurements of
large samples. The non-contact meters of the prior art require samples for
measurement to be placed within or on the instrument. This would be quite
cumbersome, even for measurements near the edge of the sample.
Measurements remote from the edge of the sample would require destructive
cutting of the sample.
Thus there is a need for a noncontact sheet conductance meter that can be
conveniently used on large area flat or curved samples having a variety of
thicknesses and having interior or exterior conductive surfaces that must
not or cannot be touched by the meter.
SUMMARY
The meter of the present invention meets these needs by providing an eddy
current probe for use against a supporting surface of the sample that can
be at a substantial predetermined distance from the conductive surface.
The meter comprises a tank coil used as an inductive element in a tank
circuit, the coil being positioned at a predetermined distance from the
sample, the tank circuit being connected in an oscillator amplifier
circuit, the oscillator amplifier circuit being controlled in response to
eddy current loading of the tank coil by the sample, a control voltage
being produced proportional to sheet conductivity of the sample. The tank
coil is capacitively shielded from the sample by a plurality of separate
conducting fingers for preventing eddy current losses in the shield. The
difference between the control voltage and an adjustable offset voltage
can be amplified by an output amplifier and displayed by a digital
voltmeter as the sheet conductance of the sample.
Preferably the tank coil is in a probe remote from an electronics package
housing the control electronics. The probe is constructed for convenient
alignment of the tank coil perpendicular to the supporting surface at a
predetermined distance from the sample, which surface can be flat or
uniformly curved parallel to the conductance surface. Preferably the probe
is remotely connected to the electronics package by a coaxial cable more
than two feet long for convenient manipulation of the tank coil.
Preferably the oscillator comprises a high frequency operational amplifier
with optically coupled gain control driven by the control signal.
Preferably means are provided for controlling the temperature of the tank
coil to avoid changes in Q caused by the resistance of the tank coil
changing with temperature. Direct current for heating is coupled to the
tank coil. A control circuit varies the direct current in response to
measured changes in the tank coil resistance for stabilizing the
resistance and temperature of the tank coil. Preferably a divider circuit
measures the tank coil resistance as a ratio of tank coil voltage to the
corresponding direct current.
Preferably the probe is provided with a shield connected to the coaxial
cable and surrounding the tank coil, the portion of the shield between the
tank coil and the sample forming closely spaced long narrow conductors
interconnected at one location only on each conductor. Preferably the
conductors form two closely spaced surfaces, the conductors of each
surface crossing at an angle of about ninety degrees. The interconnections
of the conductors are electrically connected to a conductive housing
completing an electrostatic shield for the coil. The conductive housing
provides magnetic shielding for magnetic flux associated with the tank
coil not directed toward the sample. The combination of the conductive
housing and the conductors connected at one location only confines the
magnetic field of the tank coil to an area of the sample substantially
corresponding to an area only slightly larger than that circumscribed by
the diameter of the housing, and electrostatically shields the tank coil
from the sample without interfering with magnetic coupling between the
tank coil and the sample.
The shield configuration of the probe permits meaningful sheet conductance
measurements to be made at very high gain sensitivities so that, when
necessary, the tank coil can be located a substantial distance of at least
0.75 inch from the conductive surface of the sample. In addition, the
remotely connected probe can be conveniently positioned on a large sample
to measure selected areas of a conductive surface without touching the
conductive surface.
Thus a noncontact sheet conductance meter is provided that can measure the
sheet conductance of selected areas within a large flat or curved panel
having substantial thickness and having an interior or exterior conductive
surface that must not or cannot be touched by the meter.
DRAWINGS
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention
will become better understood with reference to the following description,
appended claims, and accompanying drawings where:
FIG. 1 is a fragmentary elevational view showing a probe of the meter of
the present invention positioned against a supporting surface of a sample;
FIG. 2 is a fragmentary plan view of the probe taken along line 2--2 in
FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a sectional elevational view of the probe taken along the line
3--3 in FIG. 2;
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of the meter of the present invention showing the
probe connected to circuitry of an electronic package; and
FIG. 5 is a fragmentary simplified schematic diagram of the meter of FIG. 4
showing a D.C. coupling network and a probe temperature control in the
electronic package.
DESCRIPTION
The present invention is directed to a noncontact sheet conductance meter
that can be used on a variety of samples having conductive surfaces that
must not or cannot be touched by the meter. With reference to FIG. 1, a
conductive sheet or sample 10 rests on a support 12. The sample 10
comprises a subsrate 14 having a conducting surface 16 and an opposite
supporting surface 18, the supporting surface 18 being in contact with the
support 12. A probe 20 is positioned against the supporting surface 18 for
measurement of the conductivity of the conducting surface 16 of the sample
10. Although shown beneath the sample 10 for illustrative purposes, the
probe 20 can be used in any position to provide convenient proximity to
the sample.
MEASUREMENT ELECTRONICS
With reference to FIG. 4, the probe 20 is connected by a coaxial cable 22
to an electronic package 24. The probe 20 includes an inductive element
for a tank circuit, described more fully below. A capacitive element for
the tank circuit is a tank capacitor 25 located within the electronic
package. An oscillator circuit 26 having an oscillator output 27 is
conected to the probe 20 together with the tank capacitor 25 at a tank
node 23.
Preferably the oscillator circuit 26 is a high frequency operational
amplifier circuit having optically coupled gain control for controlling
the voltage amplitude of oscillation. The tank node 23 can be connected
with positive feedback in the operational amplifier circuit to a
non-inverting input of an operational amplifier. Optically coupled gain
voltage amplitude control of operational amplifier circuits are known in
the prior art. For example, a Raytheon CK 2142 optically controlled
variable resistor can be used as a gain control element for the
operational amplifier circuit.
A level comparator 28 compares the voltage at the oscillator output 27 with
a reference voltge 29. The level comparator 28 is connected to drive an
error amplifier 30 to produce a control voltage 32. The control voltage 32
is connected as a filtered feedback control signal 34 optically coupled to
the oscillator circuit 26 for controlling the gain of the oscillator
circuit 26 to stabilize the voltage at the oscillator output 27. The
control voltage 32 can be nominally 6.5 volts.
The magnitude of the control voltage 32 required to sustain oscillation is
an inverse function of the Q of the tank circuit. The control voltage 32
is also directly related to the loading effect imposed on the inductive
element of the probe by eddy currents induced in a lossy conductive
surface placed in the field of the probe. Ignoring certain non-linearities
inherent in the electronics implementation, the net result is a control
voltage 32 which is a linear function of the conductance per unit square
(Gs) of the conductive surface.
Preferably the tank capacitor 25 is adjustable for tuning the resonant
frequency of the tank circuit to the frequency of maximum Q of the tank
coil 64.
An output amplifier 36, balanced by an offset potentiometer 38, is driven
by the control voltage 32 for producing an output voltage 39 which is read
by a voltmeter 40.
Temperature Control
The electronic package 24 is equipped with an electronic temperature
control 42 connected to a heater 44 for stabilizing the temperature of
circuitry within the electronic package 24, thereby reducing variations in
the output voltage 39 caused by thermal drift of the circuitry.
The electronic package 24 also provides temperature control of the probe 20
to prevent changes in the Q of the inductive element of the probe 20 which
would otherwise result from changes in probe inductive element resistance
as a function of temperature. A DC coupling network 46 is connected in
series between the probe 20 and the tank node 23 for superimposing
heat-producing direct current on the inductive element of the probe 20. A
probe temperature control 48 is connected to the DC coupling network 46 to
control the magnitude of the direct current within the probe 20 for
stabilizing the temperature of the inductive element.
The oscillator circuit 26, the tank capacitor 25, and the DC coupling
network 46 of the electronic package 24 can be enclosed in a thermal
shield 47, the thermal shield 47 being thermally coupled to the heater 44.
The thermal shield 47 can have separate cavities, one enclosing the
oscillator circuit 26 and the tank capacitor 25, the other enclosing the
DC coupling network 46. Thus the temperature stabilization by the
electronic temperature control 42 is concentrated where it is most needed.
With reference to FIG. 5, the DC coupling network 46 includes a coupling
capacitor 461 and a grounded bypass inductor 462 connected to the tank
node 23 for coupling the tank node 23 to a coupler output 463, the coupler
output 463 being connected by the coaxial cable 22 to the probe 20.
The coupler output 463 is coupled to the probe temperature control 48 by a
current inductor 464 and a sensing inductor 465, each having a grounded
bypass capacitor 466 for blocking signals at the oscillator frequency. A
grounded power return 467 and a grounded voltage return 468 separately
reference the probe temperature control 48 to the DC coupling network 46.
The probe temperature control 48 has a power amplifier 481, referenced to
the power return 467, for driving the power inductor 464 through a shunt
resistor 482. Direct current from the power amplifier 481 is coupled to
the probe 20 by the current inductor 464, producing a proportional voltage
across the shunt resistor 482. A current sensing amplifier 483 is
connected across the shunt resistor 482 for providing a current signal 484
to an analog divider circuit 485. A voltage sensing amplifier 486 is
connected to the sensing inductor 465 and the voltage return 468 for
providing a voltage signal 487 to the analog divider circuit 485. The
analog divider circuit 485 is connected for providing a resistance signal
488 proportional to the resistance of the probe 20 by dividing the voltage
signal 487 by the current signal 484. The resistance signal 488 is
processed by a control amplifier 489 for driving the power amplifier 481
so that current coupled to the probe 20 is reduced by any increase in the
resistance signal 488, stabilizing the temperature and resistance of the
probe 20.
The control amplifier 489 has an adjustable temperature set point and
proportional, integral and derivative (PID) control modes for dynamic
compensation.
Preferably the power amplifier 481 can provide from approximately 0.1 to
1.5 amperes DC to the probe 20 for temperature control. The current
minimum provides for continuous resistance monitoring while the maximum
provides circuit protection and limits the required dynamic range of
control.
In summary of the above, | | |