|
|
|
| United States Patent | 4799023 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/4799023.html |
| Inventor(s) | Firooz; Kamran (Loveland, CO);
Harwood; Vance R. (Loveland, CO);
Illick, Jr.; Robert C. (Loveland, CO);
Crook; David T. (Loveland, CO) |
| Abstract | An improved digital testing device is presented which includes the
capability to detect and avoid a pair of common sources of measurement
error. One source of error occurs when measurements are made within a
Setup time before a transition in the signal under test or during a Hold
time after such a transition. This device includes the ability to detect
when this occurs and to insert a relative delay between the measurements
and transitions to eliminate such errors. The device also detects the
existence of a 3-state condition of a point of the circuit under test
during the period of a measurement and provides an output indication when
such occurs. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing from US Patent 4799023 |
|
|
Circuits and apparatus which enable elimination of setup time and hold
time testing errors |
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
January 17, 1989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parent Case |
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 318,529, filed
Nov. 5, 1981, now abandoned. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
|
|
|
| Market Size |
|
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market
sector:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Market Share |
|
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Reasonable Royalty |
|
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
|
| | |
| |
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
|
| Market Size | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Market Share | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Reasonable Royalty | N/A | [No votes] |
| | N/A | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Technical Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
We claim:
1. A circuit for use in a circuit tester, said circuit comprising:
a first input on which a data signal is to be applied;
a second input on which a detection signal is to be applied, said detection
signal indicating the times at which detection of said data signal is
initiated;
coincidence means, connected to the first and second inputs and responsive
to the data signal and the detection signal, for detecting whether a time
at which detection of the data signal is initiated occurs within a hold
time prior to the initiation of a transition of the data signal or a setup
time subsequent to the initiation of a transition of the data signal;
said setup time being the length of the interval immediately succeeding the
initiation of a transition in the data signal in which accurate detection
of the data signal cannot be made if the detection is initiated within
that interval and said hold time being the length of the interval
immediately succeeding the initiation of detection of the data signal in
which accurate detection of the data signal cannot be made if the data
signal makes a subsequent transition in thes hold time interval;
wherein each time at which said data signal is to be detected is indicated
by a trigger edge in the detection signal and wherein said coincidence
means comprises:
means, responsive to the data signal, for producing a first signal having
at each transition of the data signal a pulse of duration equal to the sum
of the setup and hold times; and
means for producing from the detection signal a delayed detection signal
which has trigger edges delayed by a fixed amount relative to the trigger
edges in the detection signal, said fixed amount of delay being selected
so that a trigger edge of the delayed detection signal occurs during one
of the pulses if and only if a trigger edge of the detection signal occurs
within a setup time after a transition in the data signal or within a hold
time begore a transition in the data signal; and
means, responsive to said first signal and responsive to the delayed
detection signal, for detecting whether a trigger edge in the delayed
detection signal occurs during one of the pulses in the first signal.
2. A circuit as in claim 1 further comprising: means, connected to the
first input, for delaying the signal on said first input, whereby a signal
on said first input can be delayed to remove a near coincidence.
3. A circuit as in claim 1 further comprising: means, connected to the
second input, for delaying the signal on said second input, whereby a
signal on said second input can be delayed to remove a near coincidence.
4. A circuit for use in a circuit tester, said circuit comprising:
a first input on which a data signal is to be applied;
a second input on which a detection signal is to be applied, said detection
signal indicating the times at which detection of said data signal is
initiated;
coincidence means, connected to the first and second inputs and responsive
to the data signal and the detection signal, for detecting whether a time
at which detection of the data signal is initiated occurs within a hold
time prior to the initiation of a transition of the data signal or a setup
time subsequent to the initiation of a transition of the data signal;
said setup time being the length of the interval immediately succeeding the
initiation of a transition in the data signal in which accurate detection
of the data signal cannot be made if the detection is initiated within
that interval and said hold time being the length of the interval
immediately succeeding the initiation of detection of the data signal in
which accurate detection of the data signal cannot be made if the data
signal makes a subsequent transition in these hold this hold time
interval;
wherein each time at which said data signal is to be detected is indicated
by a trigger edge in the detection signal and wherein said coincidence
means comprises:
means, responsive to the detection signal, for producing a second signal
having at each trigger edge of the detection signal a pulse of duration
equal to the sum of the setup and hold times; and
means for producing from the data signal a delayed data signal which has
transitions delayed by a fixed amount relative to the transitions in the
data signal, said fixed amount of delay being selected so that a
transition of the delayed data signal occurs during one of the pulses if
and only if a trigger edge of the detection signal occurs within a setup
time after a transition in the data signal or within a hold time before a
transition in the data signal; and
means, responsive to said second signal and responsive to the delayed data
signal, for detecting whether a transition in the delayed data signal
occurs during one of the pulses in the second signal.
5. A circuit as in claim 4 further comprising:
means, connected to the first input, for delaying the signal on said first
input, whereby a signal on said first input can be delayed to remove a
near coincidence.
6. A circuit as in claim 4 further comprising:
means, connected to the second input, for delaying the signal on said
second input, whereby a signal on said second input can be delayed to
remove a near coincidence. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The qualitative difference between the type of signals present in digital
devices and the type of signals present in analog devices has led to the
development of a number of techniques for testing digital devices.
Typically, these testing techniques apply a set of test signals to various
points of the circuit and then observe the digital data stream produced at
one or more test points. For example, FIG. 7 shows a 2-input AND gate, a
pair of input signals to test the operation of the AND gate, and the
correct output signal at its output port corresponding to the displayed
test input signals. This AND gate is tested by observing the digital data
stream produced at its output port and comparing this observed data stream
with that corresponding to a good (i.e. properly functioning) AND gate.
In complex circuits, the data stream must be observed at a number of test
points and each of these data streams will typically contain many more
bits than the 4 bit data stream of the example in FIG. 7. Because of the
large amount of test data generated in a test of a typical digital device,
many of the test techniques process the data streams to produce output
data which is more easily used by the person performing the test. In one
scheme known as transition counting, the test device produces for each
data stream a number representing the number of times its associated data
stream made a low-to-high or high-to-low transition.
In another digital test scheme known as signature analysis (See U.S. Pat.
No. 3,976,864 entitled "Apparatus and Method for Testing Digital Circuits"
issued to Gary B. Gordon et al on Aug. 24, 1976), each data stream is
divided by a characteristic polynomial to produce a residue (known as a
signature) of significantly shorter length than the data stream.
Typically, each signature is chosen to be 16 or 20 bits long so that the
residue can be displayed as a 4 or 5 digit display using a hexadecimal
character set. Signature analysis is implemented by measuring the
signature for each test point of a circuit under test and comparing these
signatures with those for a circuit which is known to be good. When these
two signature sets are not identical, the circuit under test is considered
to be bad. The actual element or elements in the circuit which are bad can
often be determined by locating those elements which have input signals
with correct signature and yet produce output signals with incorrect
signature.
Each of these digital testing techniques relies on the accurate detection
of the data stream being observed. One source of possible inaccurate
detection of data streams is the occurrence of measurements of the data
stream near the times of transitions in the data streams. When this
occurs, small variations between circuits can cause a data stream for one
unit under test to be detected slightly before such transitions while
causing the corresponding data stream for another unit under test to be
detected slightly after such transitions. This problem in the testing
technique could therefore produce a "bad" signature for a unit under test
thereby causing some "good units" to be tested as being bad.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In general, digital data does not make low-to-high or high-to-low
transitions along the square wave curves drawn to represent idealized data
streams. These transitions instead occur along curves with finite slope so
that there is a non-zero time for such transitions. In addition, such
rapid transitions are accompanied by transient oscillations which must
decay to a certain level before accurate detection of the digital signal
can be performed. As a result of such effects, the accurate measurement of
digital data requires that a measurement not be initiated within a short
time, known as the Setup time T.sub.s, after a data transition. Similarly
the measurement process is not instantaneous so that no data transitions
should be allowed within a short time, known as the Hold time T.sub.h,
after a measurement is initiated.
In digital devices, data streams throughout the device are typically
generated in synchronism with a clock signal. It is therefore natural to
utilize such a clock signal to control the selection of times at which the
measurement of data streams in a unit under test are performed. In some
test situations the clock signal is produced by the unit under test but in
other situations the testing device provides the clock signal. The clock
signal is usually periodic, but in some cases it can be aperiodic. For
example, in the a synchronous interface HP-IB defined by IEEE standard
488, data is transmitted a synchronously and one of the data lines carries
a signal DAV which defines when the data on the other data lines is valid.
Therefore, in testing the operation of such an interface, the DAV signal
can be utilized as the signal controlling the selection of measurement
times. In general, the signal used to control the times at which
measurements are performed on a data signal will be referred to herein as
the "detection signal". However, the particular examples discussed below
will be in terms of a periodic detection signal and will be referred to as
a clock signal. Because in each of these cases, measurement times are
initiated in response to the clock signal, it is important to detect
whether the clock signal transitions occur within the interval around the
data transitions determined by the Setup time and the Hold time.
The timing of data transitions relative to clock transitions can vary
depending on which test point in a unit under test is being tested. For
example, in the HP 3060 Board Test System by Hewlett-Packard Company,
contact is made from the HP 3060 to a circuit board under test by means of
bed-of-nails contact scheme. In that scheme each test point in the circuit
board is contacted by one of a set of test probes in the HP 3060.
Therefore, the data gathered at the various test points are subject to
relative delays caused by differences in signal delays within the circuit
board under test in reaching the test point at which the signal is tested.
This measured data is subject to further relative delays because of the
variation in delays among the various circuit paths within the HP 3060.
Therefore the detected data at each of the data points can have differing
delays relative to the clock signal, so that data at some test points can
be accurately tested even though data at other test points is inaccurately
tested. It is therefore important to check the timing of the data
transitions in each data stream from each of the test points relative to
the clock transitions.
In accordance with the disclosed preferred embodiment of the invention, the
incidence of the undesired near coincidence of clock and data transitions
is detected by first producing from the data signal a supplementary signal
having pulses in synchronism with the transitions in the data signal. Each
of these pulses has a width T.sub.1 +T.sub.2 (where T.sub.1 is the time
after a data transition in which a repeatable measurement can't be
initiated and T.sub.2 is the time before a data transition in which a
repeatable measurement can't be initiated) equal to the width of the
window about each transition in which measurements should not be
performed. The near coincidence of clock and data transitions is checked
by delaying the clock signal by the time T.sub.2 and then checking whether
the clock signal executes during any of the pulses a transition on which
data measurements are triggered. If such a transition does occur during a
pulse in the supplementary signal then a flag is set to apprise the user
of that occurrence. When a near coincidence occurs, the person testing the
unit under test can select a fixed delay T.sub.d by which the clock signal
is delayed to eliminate the near coincidence.
DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
FIG. 1 shows a circuit suitable for detecting a clock trigger edge within
the window about a low-to-high data transition defined by the Setup and
Hold times.
FIG. 2 is a timing diagram for the circuit of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 shows a circuit suitable for producing pulses of length T.sub.1
+T.sub.2 in response to negative transitions of a data signal.
FIG. 4 is a timing diagram for the circuit of FIG. 3.
FIG. 5 shows a variable delay circuit suitable for delaying a signal by a
user selectable amount.
FIG. 6 is a block diagram of a circuit tester capable of detecting whether
a clock trigger edge is within a window about a data transition defined by
the Setup and Hold times.
FIG. 7 shows input signals suitable for testing an AND gate to produce an
expected output signal.
FIG. 8 is a block diagram of a circuit tester capable of detecting whether
a data transition is within a window about a clock trigger edge defined by
the Setup and Hold times.
FIG. 9 is a block diagram of a circuit tester in which a data signal can be
delayed by a controlled amount to eliminate an unwanted near coincidence
of a clock trigger edge and transitions in the data signal.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT In FIG. 1 is shown a circuit
suitable for detecting the near coincidence of a trigger edge of a clock
signal and a low-to-high transition of a data line. A data signal is
applied to data line 11 which is connected to one input of a 2-input AND
gate 12. The data signal is also inverted by an inverter 13 and then
delayed by a delay circuit 14 to produce a delayed data signal which is
applied to the second input of AND gate 12. The output signal of the AND
gate is only high when the data signal and the delayed data signal are
both high--the relationship between these three signals is illustrated in
FIG. 2.
The output signal of the AND gate is applied to the D input of an edge
sensitive D-type flip-flop 15. The clock signal is applied to a clock line
16 which is connected through a delay circuit 17 to the clock input of
flip-flop 15. The relationship between the delayed clock signal and the
output signal of AND gate 12 is shown in FIG. 2. In that figure it is
assumed that measurements are made in response to the low-to-high
transition of the clock signal so that the edge sensitive flip-flop is
selected to respond to the low- to-high transition of the signal at its
clock input Ck. In the opposite case in which measurements are initiated
in response to a high-to-low transition of the clock signal, flip-flop 15
is also selected to be responsive to the high-to-low transition of the
signal at its clock input Ck.
The components of delay circuit 14 and 17 are selected to produce delays of
T.sub.1 +T.sub.2 and T.sub.2 respectively. This choice of delays will make
the delayed clock signal occur during the pulse in the output signal of
AND gate 12 only if the clock signal occurs within a time T.sub.1 after
the data transition or within a time T.sub.2 before the data transition
thereby initiating a measurement during the window about a data transition
in which repeatable measurements can't be initiated.
It should be noted that the combination of elements 11, 12, 13 and 14 will
produce a pulse only for low-to-high data transitions. In order to produce
a pulse for high-to-low transitions, the combination of elements 11-14 in
FIG. 1 should be replaced by the combination of elements 31-34 in FIG. 3.
In that circuit the data signal is applied on a data line 31 which is
connected through an inverter 33 to one input of an AND gate 32. The data
signal is also passed through a delay circuit 34 to the other input of AND
gate 32. FIG. 4 shows the signals which result in this circuit from the
application of the data signal to data line 33.
The circuit shown in FIG. 1 enables the detection of a clock transition
near a low-to-high data transition. The substitution of the circuit in
FIG. 3 for the combination of elements 11-14 in FIG. 1 enables the
detection of clock transitions near a high-to-low data transition.
Alternatively, the output of AND gate 12 and AND gate 32 could be applied
to the inputs of a 2 input OR gate to produce a supplementary signal
having pulses at both types of data transitions. The application of this
supplementary signal to the D input of flip-flop 15 would enable the
detection of clock transitions near either type of data transition.
When an undesired near coincidence of clock and data transitions is
detected, the problem can be alleviated by generating a delay of one
signal relative to the other. Since this problem can occur for any of the
data lines, it is easier to insert a variable delay circuit into the clock
line than to insert a variable delay circuit into each of the data lines.
One choice of a variable delay circuit is shown in FIG. 5 in which a clock
signal is passed through 4 parallel paths having inserted delays of O,
D.sub.1, D.sub.2, and D.sub.3 respectively. In response to user control, a
pair of control signals A and B select which of the input lines to
Multiplexer 51 is connected to output line 52. Initially, the A and B
inputs are both zero to select zero delay. If appear coincidence is
detected then the delay is changed to D.sub.1. If the near coincidence
persists then D.sub.2 is selected and finally if D.sub.2 is inadequate
then D.sub.3 is selected.
In general, in any given test, a data line from each of several test points
will supply data. Since each line can have different delays relative to
the clock signal, near coincidence might occur for some lines but not
others. The choice of more than 2 selections for clock delay improves the
chance that one of the choices will eliminate near coincidences for all
data times. If in a given test the 4 choices of delay provided by the
circuit in FIG. 4 are not sufficient to remove near coincidences of all
data and clock transitions, then several alternatives can be employed to
accurately test all of the test points. In one alternative, the number
and/or range of delays can be increased. In a second alternative, variable
delays can be inserted in some or all of the data lines. In a third
alternative, only data on lines having no near coincidences will be
processed when the choice of delay is zero. Then when the delay is changed
to D.sub.1, only those lines which have not been tested and which now have
no near coincidences will be tested. If some lines again show near
coincidences then this step will be repeated with D.sub.2 and then if
necessary also with D.sub.3. For a tester which is constructed to handle
clock rates up to 10 megaherz (i.e. clock periods greater than 100 nsec),
a useful choice for D.sub.1, D.sub.2 and D.sub.3 is 30, 60 and 90 nsec
respectively. Typical values for the T.sub.1 and the time T.sub.2 are 30
nsec and 20 nsec respectively so that this selection of delays should
enable near coincidences with the clock signal transitions of transitions
on any given data line to be eliminated.
In FIG. 6 is shown a data tester containing a near coincidence detector 64
like the circuit shown in FIG. 1 and a controllable delay circuit 61 like
the circuit shown in FIG. 5. A clock signal used to control the times at
which data is detected is applied on an input 62 to produce a delayed
clock signal 63. Near coincidence detector produces on line 65 a signal
indicating whether any trigger edges in the delayed clock signal occur
within a window defined by the Setup and Hold times about transitions in
data applied on a data input 66. A detector 67 is utilized to detect the
data and provide an output signal on output 68.
* * * * *
|
|
|
|
|
Description  |
|
|
|
|
|