|
Claims  |
|
|
I claim:
1. Composition for cleaning or for preventing fouling of a semipermeable
membrane comprising 20-60% by weight of a weak organic acid selected from
the group consisting of citric acid, malic acid, tartaric acid, ascorbic
acid, lactic acid, oxalic acid, sulfamic acid and mixtures thereof; and
2-40% by weight phosphorus compound selected from the group consisting of
alkali metal salts of metaphosphoric acid, amino alkyl phosphonic acids,
hydroxyalkyl diphosphonic acids, aminoalkyl and hydroxyalkyl phosphonic
acids and phosphonates, phosphonoalkanepolycarboxylic acids and salts
thereof, polyphosphoric acids and salts thereof, polyol phosphate esters,
and mixtures thereof; the amounts are based on the weight of the entire
composition.
2. Composition of claim 1 wherein said weak organic acid is selected from
the group consisting of citric acid, malic acid, oxalic acid, sulfamic
acid, and mixtures thereof.
3. Composition of claim 2 wherein said phosphorus compound is selected from
the group consisting of sodium hexametaphosphate, 1-hydroxyethane-1,
1-diphosphonic acid, amino tris methylene phosphonic acid, salts of such
acids, and mixtures thereof.
4. Composition of claim 3 also including 0.1-1% by weight of a surfactant
selected from the group consisting of anionic surfactants, nonionic
surfactants, and mixtures thereof.
5. Composition for cleaning or for preventing fouling of a semipermeable
membrane comprising 5-50% by weight of a bifluoride selected from the
group consisting of ammonium bifluoride, alkali metal bifluorides, and
mixtures thereof; 2-40% by weight of a weak organic acid selected from the
group consisting of citric acid, malic acid, tartaric acid, ascorbic acid,
lactic acid, oxalic acid sulfamic acid and mixtures thereof; and 2-40% by
weight phosphorus compound selected from the group consisting of alkali
metal salts of metaphosphoric acid, amino alkyl phosphonic acids,
hydroxyalkyl diphosphonic acids, aminoalkyl and hydroxyalkyl phosphonic
acids and phosphonates, phosphonoalkanepolycarboxylic acids and salts
thereof, polyphosphoric acids and salts thereof, polyol phosphate esters,
and mixtures thereof; the amounts are based on the weight of the entire
composition.
6. Composition of claim 5 wherein said weak organic acid is selected from
the group consisting of citric acid, malic acid, oxalic acid, sulfamic
acid, and mixtures thereof.
7. Composition of claim 6 wherein said phosphorus compound is selected from
the group consisting of sodium hexametaphosphate, 1-hydroxyethane-1,
1-diphosphonic acid, amino tris methylene phosphonic acid, salts of such
acids, and mixtures thereof; and wherein said bifluoride is selected from
the group consisting of ammonium bifluoride, sodium bifluoride, potassium
bifluoride, and mixtures thereof.
8. Composition of claim 7 also including 0.1-1% by weight of a surfactant
selected from the group consisting of anionic surfactants, nonionic
surfactants, and mixtures thereof.
9. Composition of claim 8 wherein said bifluoride is ammonium bifluoride,
wherein said weak organic acid is citric acid, and wherein said phosphorus
compound is sodium hexametaphosphate.
10. Process for cleaning or for preventing fouling a semipermeable membrane
in a water purification system wherein water is passed through said
membrane, said process comprising the step of adding to water an effective
amount for cleaning or for preventing fouling of said membrane a cleaner
composition comprising 20-60% by weight of the entire composition of a
weak organic acid selected from the group consisting of citric acid, malic
acid, tartaric acid, ascorbic acid, lactic acid, oxalic acid, sulfamic
acid and mixtures thereof; and 2-40% by weight of the entire composition
of phosphorus compound selected from the group consisting of alkali metal
salts of metaphosphoric acid, amino alkyl phosphonic acids, hydroxyalkyl
diphosphonic acids, aminoalkyl and hydroxyalkyl phosphonic acids and
phosphonates, phosphonoalkanepolycarboxylic acids and salts thereof,
polyphosphoric acids and salts thereof, polyol phosphate esters, and
mixtures thereof; and contacting said membrane with said water containing
said composition.
11. Process of claim 10 wherein said weak organic acid is selected from the
group consisting of citric acid, malic acid, oxalic acid, sulfamic acid,
and mixtures thereof.
12. Process of claim 11 wherein said phosphorus compound is selected from
the group consisting of sodium hexametaphosphate, 1-hydroxyethane-1,
1-diphosphonic acid, amino tris methylene phosphonic acid, salts of such
acids, and mixtures thereof.
13. Process of claim 12 wherein cleaner composition also includes 0.1-1% by
weight of a surfactant selected from the group consisting of anionic
surfactants, nonionic surfactants, and mixtures thereof.
14. Process for cleaning or for preventing fouling a semipermeable membrane
in a water purification system wherein water is passed through said
membrane, said process comprising the step of adding to water an effective
amount for cleaning or for preventing fouling of said membrane a cleaner
composition comprising 5-50% by weight of the entire composition of a
bifluoride selected from the group consisting of ammonium bifluoride,
alkali metal bifluorides, and mixtures thereof; 2-40% by weight of the
entire composition of a weak organic acid selected from the group
consisting of citric acid, malic acid, tartaric acid, ascorbic acid,
lactic acid, oxalic acid, sulfamic acid and mixtures thereof; and 2-40% by
weight of the entire composition of phosphorus compound selected from the
group consisting of alkali metal salts of metaphosphoric acid, amino alkyl
phophonic acids, hydroxyalkyl diphosphonic acids, aminoalkyl and
hydroxyalkyl phosphonic acids, and phosphonates,
phosphonoalkanepolycarboxylic acids and salts thereof, polyol phosphate
esters, and mixtures thereof; and contacting said membrane with said water
containing said composition.
15. Process of claim 14 wherein said weak organic acid is selected from the
group consisting of citric acid, malic acid, oxalic acid, sulfamic acid,
and mixtures thereof.
16. Process of claim 15 wherein said phosphorus compound is selected from
the group consisting of sodium hexametaphosphate, 1-hydroxyethane-1,
1-diphosphonic acid, amino tris methylene phosphonic acid, salts of such
acids, and mixtures thereof.
17. Process of claim 15 wherein said cleaner composition also includes
0.1-1% by weight of a surfactant selected from the group consisting of
anionic surfactants, nonionic surfactants, and mixtures thereof.
18. Process of claim 17 wherein said phosphorus compound is selected from
the group consisting of sodium hexametaphosphate, 1-hydroxyethane-1,
1-diphosphonic acid, amino tris methylene phosphonic acid, salts of such
acids, and mixtures thereof; and wherein said bifluoride is selected from
the group consisting of ammonium bifluoride, sodium bifluoride, potassium
bifluoride, and mixtures thereof.
19. Process of claim 17 wherein said bifluoride is ammonium bifluoride,
wherein said weak organic acid is citric acid, and wherein said phosphorus
compound is sodium hexametaphosphate. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Removal of organic and mineral deposits from solid surfaces has been
accomplished in the past with limited success. This, of course, includes
removal of organic and mineral deposits from semipermeable membranes which
are used in reverse osmosis systems to purify water and from ion-selective
membranes used in electrodialysis systems.
Osmosis concept is based on the use of a semipermeable membrane which is
semipermeable to water but which rejects certain dissolved salts. If pure
water is separated from a salt solution by a semipermeable membrane, water
will flow through the membrane from the pure water side to the impure
water side or from dilute solution side to the more concentrated solution.
This results in diluting the more concentrated solution and such process
continues until osmotic equilibrium is reached at which point, osmotic
pressure or solution concentration on both sides of the membrane is about
equal.
It is known, however, that if positive pressure is applied to the salt
solution sufficient to overcome the osmotic pressure, the flow will be
reversed and water will flow from the salt solution through the membrane
to the pure water side. This is what is meant by reverse osmosis. To
accomplish this, pressure of 600 to 800 psi is usually applied to the
feedwater side in order to reverse the flow of water to the pure water or
product water side. Product water is 95 to 99% free of dissolved material.
Such pressures are generally used to purify saline water by forcing the
water through the membrane which rejects minerals.
Electrodialysis is an electrochemical separation process in which salts
that are dissolved in water are forced through ion selective membranes
under the influence of an applied electric field. The net result of this
dialytic process is the transfer of ions from a less concentrated solution
to a more concentrated solution. Electrodialysis reversal is simply an
electrodialysis process in which the polarity of the applied direct
current potential is automatically reversed at regular 15 to 30 minute
intervals. Polarity reversal changes the direction of ion movement within
the membrane stack.
Operational limitations on unidirectional membrane processes are imposed by
the chemistry of the concentrate or brine stream. Long term, stable system
performance is of critical importance for industrial operations and
municipal supplies. Membrane fouling and mineral scale formation radically
degrade system performance. Typical pretreatment for unidirectional
membrane processes includes presoftening or treatment of the feedwater
with acid and/or complexing agents such as polyphosphates. Such
pretreatment and chemical feed requirements add the burdens of cost and
waste treatment to the desalting process.
The semipermeable membranes are generally thin and delicate. They can be
supported on spongy or foamed matrix to provide mechanical support for the
membrane. Such matrices have open cells which allow passage of water or
liquid. Semipermeable membranes are made from any suitable material such
as cellulose acetate, cellulose triacetate, a polyamide, or a polysulfone.
The continued efficiency of a reverse osmosis system depends on the
maintenance of the membrane in an unfouled condition. Probably the
greatest problem experienced in the use of these systems is fouling of the
membrane by scale. Typically, the membrane becomes fouled by scale
build-up to a point where it must be replaced quite often. The cartridge
containing the membrane must be removed and replaced by a clean cartridge.
The used cartridge is then treated to remove scale. Obviously, it is
desirable to prevent scale build-up or at least, prolong the time between
cartridge changes. This is ordinarily done by injecting certain chemical
additives to the impure water, which are used for the purpose of
preventing the build-up of foulants.
Cleaning of the membrane can be made in place whereby the piping is
provided to allow for recirculation of a cleaner solution. In this
fashion, valves are manipulated to allow for recirculation of the cleaner
solution through the membrane until the membrane is cleaned to the point
where it can be returned into a reverse osmosis system. In some
commercially operating systems, a membrane cartridge is removed and placed
in a cleaner mode where a cleaner solution is recirculated through the
membrane in the cartridge until the membrane is sufficiently clean for
reuse. In either case, a cleaning solution is prepared which is capable of
removing scale and other foulants from the membrane. Also, in some
situations, an additive can be added to infeed water to prevent or reduce
formation of foulants which, otherwise, would deposit on the membrane and
thus clog it.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,357,254 describes various prior art which generally relates
to removal of calcium and magnesium scale. That patent itself is directed
to compositions for cleaning solid surfaces and reverse osmosis membranes
for removal of calcium, magnesium and iron scale. The iron scale is
generally iron oxide which is primarily formed by the use of steel pipes
or fittings which gradually raise the level of ferrous iron in water. The
ferrous iron is then oxidized by dissolved oxygen to form ferric iron
which hydrolyzes to ferric oxide or hydroxide which deposits on the
membrane. Ferrous ion can also enter via the feedwater.
For cleaning reverse osmosis membranes containing little or no iron scale,
U.S. Pat. No. 4,357,254 discloses compositions comprising a monobasic or
dibasic sodium phosphate, citric acid, malic acid, and a nonionic
surfactant. Citric and/or malic acids are used in amount of at least 20%.
That patent also discloses that in reverse osmosis systems where there is
a significant amount of iron oxide scale, oxalic acid should also be
included. Such compositions are effective for cleaning fouled reverse
osmosis membranes by dissolving and dispersing organic and mineral
deposits, which primarily are calcium and magnesium scale as well as
silicates and colloidal clay.
As is noted in U.S. Pat. No. 4,357,254, the disclosed composition is
dissolved in water to a concentration of from about 0.1% by weiqht to
about 5% by weight. Any concentration within that range will effectively
clean the membrane, the primary effect of varying concentration being in
the cleaning time. At a preferred concentration of about 2%, the average
system can be cleaned in from 1/2 to 1 hour at about 25.degree. C. As the
concentration goes to the higher end of the range, the saving in cleaning
time, due to the kinetics of the system, is not appreciably shortened over
the 1/2 to 1 hour cleaning time at the preferred concentration of 2%. As
the concentration goes to the low end of the range, the cleaning time can
become inconveniently long. Even at the low end of the range, however, the
capacity of the solution is more than adequate to effectively clean the
membrane.
By means of another approach, the composition can be injected into the
input water to provide 0.01 to 5000 ppm, preferably 0.1 to 50 ppm, for the
purpose of maintaining the membrane in a relatively clean condition or to
prolong the use of the membrane by keeping it cleaner longer. Pursuant to
this approach, membranes are kept in operation for extended periods before
they are cleaned or replaced.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,386,005 discloses the synergistic relationship of a low
molecular weight polyacrylic acid and phytic acid compositions to reduce
build-up of calcium, magnesium, and/or iron scale. In col. 3, this patent
discloses pertinent prior art and the unique feature of iron scale which
can damage the membrane by growth of crystals within the membrane.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,496,470, which is a c-i-p of U.S. Pat. No. 4,357,254,
describes similar semipermeable membrane cleaner compositions as U.S. Pat.
No. 4,357,254 but additionally discloses that sulfamic acid can be used in
place of or in conjunction with citric acid and/or malic acid, i.e., weak
organic acids. Sulfamic acid is also a weak organic acid.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,386,005 describes scale-inhibiting compositions of low
molecular weight polyacrylic acids which are effective against calcium and
magnesium scale to a point where cleaning of a semipermeable membrane is
not necessary for several months. This patent also discloses that phytic
acid is at least as effective as low molecular weight polyacrylic acid for
inhibiting calcium and magnesium scale build-up on reverse osmosis
membranes. Phytic acid is also very effective in inhibiting formation or
deposition of iron scale on a reverse osmosis membrane where the feedwater
is saline or brackish. Although saline water has a low concentration of
iron, brackish water has an extremely high iron concentration.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention pertains to removal of organic and mineral deposits from
solid surfaces, such as cleaning of semipermeable membranes used in
reverse osmosis systems, using cleaning compositions and to the cleaning
compositions themselves. The novel cleaning compositions are the cleaners
for alkaline earth metal salts and metal oxides and hydroxides, and the
silica and silicate cleaners to which are added one or more phosphorus
compounds selected from phosphates and phosphonates in sufficient amount
to inhibit precipitation of metal salts of active cleaning ingredients
such as calcium fluoride, calcium oxalate, and the like.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
This invention pertains to the use of a phosphorus compound selected from
phosphates and phosphonates in cleaners for alkaline earth metal salts,
alkaline earth metal oxides and hydroxides, and silica and silicate salts
for the purpose of making such cleaners more tolerant to hardness ions.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,375,254 describes a cleaner for silicates, colloidal clay
and alkaline earth metal salts, particularly calcium carbonate, magnesium
carbonate, calcium sulfate, barium sulfate and strontium sulfate. Such
cleaners comprise 10-40% monobasic or dibasic sodium phosphate, 0-60%
citric acid or 0-60% malic acid, and 0.1-5% of a nonionic surfactant.
Total amount of citric and/or malic acid must be at least 20% and a
suitable surfactant is a low-foaming nonionic surfactant, such as
polyoxyethylene (12) tridecyl ether. Such cleaners are particularly
effective in cleaning fouled reverse osmosis membranes.
The phosphates in the silicate cleaner compositions serve the dual purpose
of cleaning as well as buffering the cleaning solution at a pH of about 2
to 4. The use of chelating agents, such as citric acid or malic acid,
serves the dual function of dissolving alkali metal and alkaline earth
metal salts, such as calcium and magnesium, and of preventing
precipitation of phosphates caused by iron. The surfactant dissolves
organic materials and emulsifies inorganic solids. It is necessary to
remove and emulsify solids, such as colloidal materials, in order to
expose the scale which can then be removed by other ingredients in the
cleaner composition.
While monobasic and dibasic sodium phosphates can be used in or be a part
of the silicate cleaners, the corresponding potassium phosphates can be
substituted. In the past, phosphoric acid was used in place of the
monobasic and dibasic alkali metal salts. Also, while the preferred
compositions contain both citric and malic acids, such compositions are
also effective with only one of these acids.
A cleaner composition which is particularly adapted for removal of
silica/silicate scales is based on ammonium bifluoride and/or alkali metal
bifluoride, such as sodium bifluoride. Silica/silicate scales include
divalent cation scales such as calcium silicate and magnesium silicate and
trivalent silicate scales such as ferric silicate and aluminum silicate.
Such compositions contain 10 to 50% ammonium bifluoride (NH.sub.4
HF.sub.2) or an alkali metal bifluoride such as sodium bifluoride, 15 to
55% citric and/or malic acid, 15 to 55% monosodium and/or disodium
phosphate or phosphoric acid, and 0.1 to 2% surfactant. This composition
can also be further modified by the addition of malic acid in place of or
in addition to the citric acid, and oxalic acid for iron scale
solubilization or inhibition.
The prior art cleaners which are effective against alkaline earth metal
salts but are not effective against silica/silicate salts are devoid of
monobasic and dibasic alkali metal phosphates, phosphoric acid, ammonium
or alkali metal bifluoride. Such cleaners are particularly effective in
solubilizing and inhibiting formation of scales such as calcium carbonate.
The cleaning compositions described above are primarily useful for cleaning
reverse osmosis membranes in systems where there is little or no iron
scale. In a system where there is a significant amount of iron scale,
oxalic acid is also included in amount of 5-30%.
The cleaning compositions of this invention are intended for use at an acid
pH of about 2 to 4. A composition to be used at high pH can be used to
clean membranes fouled with fats, oils and other organic matter. In such a
case, an anionic surfactant would be used since such surfactants are
effective on oils or oily deposits.
Anionic or nonionic surfactants are suitable herein, although non-foaming
or low-foaming nonionic surfactants are preferred. Mixtures of one or both
can be used.
Typical low foaming nonionic detergents are well known in the art and
generally comprise the class of compounds formed by condensation of an
alkyl phenol, an alkyl amine, or an aliphatic compound having a
polyoxyethylene chain within the molecule, i.e., a chain composed of
recurring (--O--CH.sub.2 --CH.sub.2 --) groups. Many compounds of this
type are known and used for their detergent, surface active, wetting and
emulsifying properties. The detergents of this type which are useful in
the present invention are those produced by condensation of about 4-16
moles of ethylene oxide with 1 mole of a compound selected from the group
consisting of (1) alkyl phenols having about 1-15 carbon atoms in the
alkyl group; (2) alkyl amines having about 10-20 carbon atoms in the alkyl
group; (3) aliphatic alcohols having about 10-20 carbon atoms in their
molecules; and (4) hydrophobic polymers formed by condensing propylene
oxide with propylene glycol. The nonionic detergent used in the invention
should have sufficient ethylene oxide units to insure solubility thereof
in the detergent composition or in any dilution thereof which may be used
in practice. Furthermore, the nonionic detergent used in this invention
must be low- or non-foaming.
I have described above two kinds of cleaners: one which is particularly
effective against alkaline earth metal scales such as calcium and
magnesium scales, and one which is particularly effective against
silica/silicate scales, such as silicates of calcium, magnesium, aluminum,
and iron. The alkaline earth metal cleaners are also effective against
metal oxides and hydroxides such as iron aluminum and manganese oxides and
hydroxides. The cleaner composition which is particularly effective
against alkaline earth metal scales and the oxide and hydroxide scales is
based on at least one alkali metal phosphate and citric, malic, sulfamic
acid, and/or oxalic acid whereas the cleaner composition which is
particularly effective against silica/silicate scales, is based on
ammonium or alkali metal bifluorides. For brevity, the first one will also
be referred to hereinafter as an alkaline earth metal cleaner whereas the
second one, as a silicate cleaner.
The problem with the known cleaners is their inability to produce desired
results in the form of less deposition of organic and inorganic matter on
semipermeable reverse osmosis membranes. Although the known cleaner
compositions, which contain one or more weak organic acids such as citric
acid, malic acid, oxalic acid, tartaric acid, ascorbic acid, and lactic
acid, are effective in solubilizing alkaline earth metal scales and metal
oxides and hydroxides, such compositions lose effectiveness after a time,
about one-half hour or less since at low pH they start precipitating
alkaline earth metal salts of citric acid, malic acid, oxalic acid and/or
sulfamic acid, and other scales which are insoluble in water and which
deposit on semipermeable membranes. Specific salts contemplated herein
which can precipitate on a membrane include calcium citrate, calcium salts
of malic acid, calcium oxalate, calcium sulfamate, and the like. This is
an existing problem since it takes about one-half hour to one hour to
clean a semipermeable membrane. In the case of silicate cleaners, alkaline
earth metal bifluorides, such as calcium fluoride, are also formed which
are insoluble in water and which can precipitate out on a semipermeable
membrane.
The invention herein pertains to extending tolerance of the known cleaner
compositions to precipitation of insoluble scales which deposit on
semipermeable membranes. Since it takes at least one-half hour to one hour
to clean a semipermeable membrane in a cleaning mode, precipitation of
insoluble scales must be delayed or deferred at least one hour after the
membrane is brought into contact with a cleaning composition.
It was discovered that the use of a phosphorus compound selected from
phosphates and phosphonates with ingredients which characterize the
alkaline earth metal cleaners and silicate cleaners can reduce or delay
precipitation substantially and thus maintain salts in solution which
would normally precipitate out in absence of such phosphorus compounds.
Effectiveness of the cleaner compositions containing one or more of the
phosphorus compounds is limited to the acid or low pH side below neutral
pH of 7, preferably to pH of 2 to 4.
Suitable phosphorus compounds for inhibiting precipitation of scales
include aminoalkyl, hydroxy alkyl phosphonic acids and phosphonates,
phosphonalkanepolycarboxylic acids and salts thereof, polyphosphoric acids
and salts thereof, and polyol phosphate esters. Particularly suitable
herein are alkali metal salts of metaphosphoric acid, such as sodium
hexametaphosphate, and aminoalkyl phosphonic acids and hydroxyalkyl
diphosphonic acids and salts thereof.
Certain organophosphorous compounds, such as aminoalkyl phosphonic acids,
N-substituted aminomethylene phosphonic acids, and both N- and
C-substituted aminomethylene phosphonic acids, can be employed as the
phosphorus compounds in membrane cleaning compositions. These compounds
can be prepared pursuant to the disolosure of U.S. Pat. No. 3,288,846.
Generally, such compounds can be characterized as containing at least one
N-C-P linkage in their molecules, and have the following structural
formula:
##STR1##
wherein R.sup.3 and R.sup.4 are individually selected from hydrogen and
organic radicals, preferably hydrogen; R.sup.1 and R.sup.2 are
individually selected from hydrogen, organic radicals, and alkylene
phosphonic radicals, such as are within the brackets, above. Salts of the
above compounds can also be used. Examples of this group of compounds
include aminotri(methylene phosphonic acid), potassium salt of
hexamethylenediamine tetra(methylene phosphonic acid), diethylenetriamine
penta (methylene phosphonic acid) and polyhexylene polyamine polymethylene
phosphonic acid.
The hydroxyalkyl -1, 1-diphosphonic acids described in U.S. Pat. No. Re.
28,553 are useful herein. Preferred compounds in this group are defined by
the following structural formula:
##STR2##
wherein R is a lower alkyl radical of 1 to 5 carbon atoms. The OH groups
can be in esterified and two or more molecules can be converted to
corresponding anhydrides. An especially useful compound in this group is 1
- hydroxyethane -1, 1- diphosphonic acid, also referred to as HEDP.
Certain of the phosphono alkanepolycarboxylic acids disclosed in U.S. Pat.
No. 3,886,205 can be used as the phosphorus compounds referred to herein.
These compounds are generally defined as follows:
##STR3##
wherein R can be hydrogen, lower alkyl of 1 to 5 carbons, or carboxyl and
R.sup.1 can be hydrogen or methyl. Alkali metal, ammonium or amine salts
of the above compounds are also suitable. These compounds can also be
characterized as phosphonoalkane di- and tricarboxylic acids containing 2
to 6 carbon atoms in the alkane group. The above compounds have a strong
complex-forming effect on alkaline earth metal ions. An especially
effective compound in this group is 2-phosphonobutale-1, 2,
4-tricarboxylic acid.
Useful polyphosphoric acid compounds or polyphosphates are also disclosed
by U.S. Pat. No. 2,358,222. This group of compounds include
pyrophosphates, metaphosphates, and complex phosphates. The
polyphosphates, such as pyrophosphates, triphosphate, tetraphosphate,
hexametaphosphate, and complex phosphates, are generally derived by
molecular dehydration of orthophosphoric acid compounds.
Useful polyolphosphates contain one or more 2-hydroxyethyl groups and one
or more of the following groups:
##STR4##
and salts thereof. Preparation of such compounds is disclosed in U.S. Pat.
No. 3,462,365, of which, glycerine phosphate esters are preferred. Also
included in this group of compounds are the phosphated mixed esters of
non-surface active polyols containing at least one hydroxyethyl group and
monohydric surface active compounds containing oxyethylene groups,
described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,723,420.
The amino phosphonates useful herein are defined as follows:
##STR5##
where R is
##STR6##
and R.sup.1 is R or --CH.sub.2 CH.sub.2 OH and R.sup.2 is R, --CH.sub.2
CH.sub.2 OH or
##STR7##
where M is H, NH.sub.4, alkali metal, or a combination thereof, and n is 1
to 6. Such compounds are described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,336,221. Other
useful amino phosphonates are described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,434,969.
Amount of the phosphorus compound used in the cleaning compositions
described herein can vary from 0.5 to 70%, preferably 2 to 40%, based on
the weight of the entire composition. Representative silicate cleaner
compositions of this invention are illustrated below in weight percent:
______________________________________
Broad Preferred
Range Range
______________________________________
Ammonium Bifluoride 1-60 5-50
Citric Acid and/or Malic Acid
0-60 2-40
Phosphorus Compound 0.5-70 2-40
Surfactant 0-2 0.1-1
100.0% 100.0%
______________________________________
Representative alkaline earth metal cleaner compositions of this invention
are illustrated below, in weight percent:
______________________________________
Broad Preferred
Range Range
______________________________________
Citric Acid and/or Oxalic Acid
10-99 20-60
Phosphorus Compound 0.5-70 2-40
Surfactant 0-2 0.1-1
100.0% 100.0%
______________________________________
The above cleaning compositions can include different phosphorus compounds:
SHMP, which designates sodium hexamethaphosphate, and the phosphonate
compound, which designates aminotri (methylene phosphonic acid) or
Dequest.RTM. 2000, available from Monsanto Comapny. Dequest.RTM. 2000 is
in a liquid form and is, for that reason, used to prepare a liquid
cleaning composition.
The cleaning compositions can be shipped in concentrated forms, whether
solid or liquid, and then diluted with water at the site of use. Cleaning
compositions ready for use are normally liquid. Such compositions diluted
in water to the extent of 2-5% concentration, can be used in recirculating
water streams to clean semipermeable membranes. Also, such cleaning
compositions can be added to the infeed stream in amount of 0.1 to 5000
ppm, preferably 1-50 ppm, so that the treated water can be passed through
the semipermeable membrane and thus keep foulants to a minimum whereby
cleaning of the membrane would be needed less frequently.
The invention is more specifically demonstrated by examples which follow.
EXAMPLE I
This example demonstrates the use of a phosphorus compound in a silicate
cleaner where the primary ingredient was ammonium bifluoride (NH.sub.4
HF.sub.2).
Experiments were conducted by dissolving 0.60 grams of ammonium bifluoride
in 50 ml of distilled water containing 0-0.70 gram citric acid, and 0-0.7
gram of various phosphorus compounds, as given in Table A. To this cleaner
composition was then added dropwise and with continuous stirring, dilute
(0.1M) calcium solution. The onset of turbidity was monitored with a fiber
optic probe connected to colorimeter (PC-1000 Brinkman).
Results of the experiments are given in Table A, below, where certain of
the phosphorus compounds show a higher calcium ion tolerance, which is
translated into improved protection against precipitation of calcium
fluoride. Calcium fluoride, as noted earlier, is insoluble in water and
would normally settle-out on a semipermeable membrane in a reverse osmosis
system if a cleaner were used without the phosphorus compound.
TABLE A
______________________________________
CIT-
RIC
EXP. NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2
ACID PHOSPHATE (g)
Ca TOLER-
NO. (g) (g) MSP SHMP STPP ANCE (ppm)
______________________________________
1 0.60 -- -- -- -- 38
2 0.60 -- -- 0.01 -- 55
3 0.60 -- -- 0.025
-- 82
4 0.60 -- -- 0.10 -- 133
5 0.60 -- -- 0.25 -- 240
6 0.60 -- -- 0.50 -- >350
7 -- 0.69 -- -- -- >350
8 0.60 0.69 -- -- -- 40
9 0.60 0.69 -- 0.01 -- 100
10 0.60 0.69 -- 0.10 -- 160
11 0.60 0.69 -- 0.30 -- 280
12 0.60 0.69 -- 0.50 -- >350
13 0.60 0.69 0.68 -- -- 40
14 0.60 0.69 0.68 0.01 -- 100
15 0.60 0.69 -- -- -.50 48
______________________________________
In the above Table A, MSP represents monosodium phosphate, SHMP represents
sodium hexametaphosphate, and STPP represents sodium tripolyphosphate.
Results in Exp. 1 in Table A show that with 0.60 gram of ammonium
bifluoride in solution, only 38 ppm of calcium ions was maintained in
solution. When 0.01 gram of sodium hexametaphosphate was added along with
0.60 gram of ammonium bifluoride in Exp. 2, amount of solubilized calcium
increased to 55 ppm which increased to in excess of 350 ppm on addition of
0.50 gram of sodium hexametaphosphate. Exp. 7 shows that 0.69 gram of
citric acid alone can solubilize in excess of 350 ppm of calcium, however,
it should be remembered that in siicate cleaner compositions, ammonium or
an alkali metal bifluoride is also employed to solubilize the silicate
scales. In Exp. 8, where ammonium bifluoride was used with citric acid,
only 40 ppm of calcium was maintained in solution. It appears that
ammonium bifluoride has an adverse affect on calcium tolerance. In Exp. 9,
where the use of ammonium bifluoride, citric acid and 0.01 gram of sodium
hexametaphosphate is demonstrated, amount of calcium maintained in
solution was increased to 100 ppm due to the presence of sodium
hexametaphosphate which increased to above 350 when amount of SHMP was
increased to 0.050, see Exp. 12. In Exp. 13, relative ineffectiveness of
0.68 gram of monosodium phosphate is shown with ammonium bifluoride and
citric acid, the two principal ingredients of silicate cleaners. Relative
ineffectiveness of sodium tripolyphosphate is demonstrated in Exp. 15.
Exp. 14 demonstrates the salutary effect of sodium hexametaphosphate on
cleaners containing ammonium bifluoride, citric acid, and monosodium
phosphate.
EXAMPLE II
The experiments in this example demonstrate effectiveness of phosphonates
in silicate cleaners for improving tolerance to calcium ions. Such
cleaners are characterized by the presence of ammonium bifluoride or an
alkali metal bifluoride, such as sodium bifluoride, which solubilize
silica and silicate salts. Results of these tests are given in Table B,
below, where experimental procedures was the same as that in Ex. I.
TABLE B
__________________________________________________________________________
EXP.
NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2
CITRIC ACID
PHOSPHONATES (g)
Ca TOLERANCE
NO. (g) (g) A B C D E F (ppm)
__________________________________________________________________________
1 0.60 0.69 -- --
--
--
--
--
40
2 0.60 0.69 0.50
--
--
--
--
--
200
3 0.60 0.69 -- .15
--
--
--
--
300
4 0.60 0.69 -- .25
--
--
--
--
>350
5 0.60 0.69 -- .50
--
--
--
--
>350
6 0.60 0.69 -- --
.25
--
--
--
>350
7 0.60 0.69 -- --
--
.50
--
--
40
8 0.60 0.69 -- --
--
--
.50
--
80
9 0.60 0.69 -- --
--
--
--
.50
70
__________________________________________________________________________
The following designations appear in the above table:
A=Dequest-2000, amino tris methylene phosphonic acid (Monsanto)
B=Dequest-2010, 1-hydroxyethane 1,1-diphosphonic acid (Monsanto)
C=Lonza-106, 1-hydroxyethane 1,1-diphosphonic acid (Lonza)
D=Lonza-905, diethylenetriamine penta (methylene phosphonic acid) (Lonza)
E=Lonza-1704, polyhexylene polyamine polymethylene phosphonic acid (Lonza)
F=Bayhibit-AM, 2-phosphono-1,2,4 - butane tricarboxylic acid (Mobay)
The above results show that without any phosphonates, calcium tolerance was
only 40 ppm, which means that only 40 ppm of calcium ions were solubilized
by the composition. This increased substantially when the various
phosphonates were added. The best results were obtained with Dequest-2010
at a level of 0.25 gram. With 0.50 gram of Lonza-905 phosphonate, only 40
ppm calcium tolerance was attained, which is about the same as without any
phosphonate.
EXAMPLE III
These experiments demonstrate effectiveness of certain additives in
alkaline earth metal cleaners.
Here, experimental procedure at room temperature involved the addition of
0-0.5 gram of an additive scale inhibitor to 80 ml of distilled water. To
this solution was then added 10 ml of 0.1M oxalic acid followed by
dropwise addition of 10 ml of 0.1M calcium chloride. The solution was
continually stirred at about 400 revolutions per minute with a
teflon-coated stirring bar. During each experiment, the time to onset of
turbidity or the start of calcium oxalate precipitation, was noted.
Results of the experiments, which were carried out at pH of 2, are set
forth in Table C, below:
TABLE C
______________________________________
Oxalic
acid
Exp. Dosage (0.1M, CaCl.sub.2
Time To
No. Additive (ppm) ml) (0.1M, me)
Precipitate
______________________________________
1 None -- 10 10 15 sec.
2 NaH.sub.2 PO. | | |