 |
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates prostheses for human joints, and more
particularly to prostheses for knee, elbow, or other joints of the body,
and more particularly to a method for designing the same. In particular,
the present invention has a preferred application as a knee prosthesis.
The movement of the knee joint in flexion and extension does not take
place in a simple hinge-like manner, as in some other joints, but in a
complicated movement, that includes displacements and rotations, so that
the same part of one articular surface is not always applied to the same
part of the other articular surface, and the axis of motion is not fixed.
Furthermore, the knee joint is formed between the longest bones of the
body, consequently with high lever arms relative to the foot and to the
hip, and therefore, the forces and moments across the joint at the
interface between the articulating surfaces exceeds that of any other
joint in the body.
Attempts to implant knee prostheses employing a metal hinge and
intramedullary stems for anchoring the hinge to the femur and tibia date
back to the 1930's. Because of the complexity of the knee joint action,
and the forces and moments across the joint, these prostheses were
unsuccessful. The elements were subject to wear resulting in dispersion of
metal into the surrounding tissue with consequent complications, and in
high stresses at the implant-bone interfaces resulting in bone resorption,
pain, and implant failure. However, a hinge does not permit ready access
of natural lubrication to the joint, and, by its nature, permits rotation
only through a single plane. It cannot duplicate the complex movements of
the knee joint. Thus, a less than satisfactory result is inevitable. See,
e.g., D. V. Girzadas et al., "Performance of a Hinged Metal Knee
Prosthesis", J. Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol. 50-A, No. 2, March 1968, pp.
355 et seq.
Since that time, unlinked condylar replacement knee replacements have been
designed. These allowed some freedom of motion between the femoral and
tibial replacement surfaces. The first example was the polycentric knee by
Gunston. (Gunston, J. Bone & Joint Surgery)
Another early design was by Ewald, in which he proposed surfaces
representing the anatomical to allow normal joint motion. The Ewald
prosthesis was an advancement over the earlier knees in that it permits
rotation of the tibia with respect to the femur (i.e., pivoting of the
medial condyle about the lateral condyle), and translation of the femur
with respect to the tibia-movements in different planes at once (sagittal
and transverse). All of those movements are necessary to duplicate the
movement of a natural knee. For a detailed description of the control
mechanism and the guiding components of the knee joint during normal
extension and more particularly flexion, see O. C. Brantigan et al., "The
Mechanics of the Ligaments and Menisci of the Knee Joint", J. Bone and
Joint Surgery, Vol. XXIII, No. 1, January 1941, pp. 44 et seq.; and A. J.
Helfet, "Control and Guide Mechanism of the Knee Joint", A.A.O.S.
Instructional Course Lectures (1970), pp. 64-65.
However, although the Ewald prosthesis provided a more natural movement
than the prior art knee joints, the Ewald knee was not designed to allow
for the natural knee movement known as laxity. Laxity can be defined as
the partially restrained motion or free play in a specified direction
before substantial ligamentous restraint takes place at the extremes of
motion (see generally, Markolf, K. L., et al, Journal of Bone & Joint
Surgery, 63-A; 570-585, 1981; Walker, P. S. Ch. 4, p. 202-204, Human
Joints & Their Artificial Replacements, pub. C. C. Thomas, Springfield,
Ill., 1977). Since laxity is limited by certain ligaments that are
resected during implantation of a prosthesis, primarily the cruciate
ligaments, prior to the present invention, there was a need in the art for
a prosthesis capable of duplicating the laxity characteristics of a
natural knee joint.
Several designs allowed freedom of motion, by providing partial conformity
between the femoral and tibial surfaces, using geometrical radii of
curvature. These designs included the DuoPatella, Townley, Total Condylar,
and Anametric. However, the shape of the surfaces is not related to the
actual motion and laxity of the normal knee joint.
The femoral condyles of a knee prosthesis can be joined to the femur in
several different ways. One method is to provide two pegs which insert
into the trabecular bone of the medial and lateral femoral condyles.
Another method is to provide a stem that projects from the center of the
condyles and is inserted into and locked within the medullary canal of the
femur. Because of the valgus angle of the femur, it was necessary to
provide both right and left femoral components, which were not
interchangeable with each other. In addition, certain situations require a
short stem, while others require a long stem. Thus, it was necessary to
maintain in stock four different femoral components--long stem and short
stem versions of both left and right leg components.
OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
It is therefore, a general object of this invention, to provide a method of
designing a prosthesis which overcomes the foregoing limitations of the
known prostheses.
A more specific object of the invention is to provide a method of designing
a prosthesis that provides joint motion which accurately simulates the
motion of the natural joint.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a method of designing a
prosthesis that accounts for laxity in the motion of the joint.
It is yet a further object of the invention to provide a knee joint
prosthesis that facilitates walking, stair climbing, stair descending,
rising from a chair, and other uses of the joint.
It is still a further object of the present invention to provide a
prosthesis that facilitates the access of the natural lubricating synovial
fluid to the mating surfaces and escape of wear and other abrasive
particles within and around the prosthesis.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a prosthesis
which acts cooperatively with the natural ligaments remaining after the
surgery to cause the respective components of the prosthesis to move
substantially as in nature including flexion-extension, varus-valgus,
internal-external rotation, anterior-posterior displacement, and laxity.
Briefly described, the joint prosthesis made by the process of the present
invention includes a substantially smooth male portion and a mating female
portion designed to interact. In general, the male portion is similar in
shape and size to the end of the bone which it replaces, as determined by
sectioning measurements of a plurality of actual specimens.
The female portion is considerably different in shape from the natural
female member since it includes articular surfaces which are shaped to
provide the required stability, motion and laxity, previously provided by
structures such as menisci and ligaments, which are necessarily resected
at surgery or are made ineffective by the disease. In other joints such as
the elbow, etc., the articular surfaces of the prosthesis likewise
function as the capsular or the like ligaments which may have been
destroyed by disease or injury, or necessarily resected during prosthetic
replacement.
The knee prosthesis of the present invention comprises in combination two
components: a femoral component and a tibial plateau. These components are
mated, preferably by the method herein described, so that they operate in
conjunction to permit normal knee-joint functioning. In particular, the
tibial plateau comprises articular surfaces, described in greater detail
hereinafter, which operate in conjunction with the femoral component, to
accomplish substantially the same result as the combination of the tibial
surfaces, the collateral and cruciate ligaments, and menisci in the
natural knee.
The femoral component may comprise a pair of condyles and is similar in
size and shape to the distal end of a normal average femur, and has a
range of sizes to span the normal size ranges of human knee joints. A
model for the femoral component may be imagined by cutting the articular
surfaces from the outer surfaces of an anatomical distal femur, while
forming medial and lateral condyles, substantially smooth and rounded in
shape.
A particular improvement of one form of the present invention over the
prior art knee joint prostheses is that the femoral component bearing
geometry is a piecewise mathematical analog of the average anatomical
femoral surface geometry, with a range of sizes.
The tibial plateau component of the method of the present invention is
considerably different from the proximal end of a normal tibia. Part of
the reason for this difference is the objective that the component, in
conjunction with the ligaments remaining after surgical intervention and
the femoral component, perform the function of the cruciate ligaments and
the menisci in the normal knee joint. Thus, the tibial plateau includes
means to provide for the appropriate amount of stability, guide the joint
surfaces in an anatomical motion path, but allow for normal laxity, as the
knee moves in its full flexion-extension range. Such means may include
means to guide the lateral condyle of the femoral component during flexion
in a substantially anterior-posterior direction through a curved articular
surface of the tibial plateau while rotating and translating the
femur-tibia in the sagittal plane. These means may be provided by
extension surfaces in the tibial plateau mated at extension with the
condyles of the femoral component with maximal surface contact, flexion
surfaces mated during flexion with the condyles with substantial surface
contact, and raised extending upwardly curved guiding-bearing laxity
surfaces for guiding the movement during flexion and resisting dislocation
gradually but increasingly as respective components depart from the
desired path.
The tibial plateau component is created from a computer generated design
originated by sweeping the femoral bearing surface through the prescribed
motion, including three displacements and two rotations defined as a
function of flexion in polynomial equations, with laxity superimposed. The
superimposed laxity consists of anterior-posterior displacement,
medial-lateral displacement, and internal-external rotation. The laxity
curves are polynomial equations describing increasing resistance as a
function of deviation from the central motion path, and as a function of
flexion angle.
These and other objects, advantages and features of the invention will be
more clearly understood by reference to the following detailed description
thereof, the appended claims, and to the several views illustrated in the
attached drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The present invention will be better understood by reference to the
attached drawings, which illustrate the present invention, and wherein:
FIGS. 1 and 3 are anterior views of a condylar replacement total knee;
FIG. 2 is a side view of FIG. 1;
FIGS. 4, 4A, and 4B are computer generated views of a femur;
FIG. 5 is a piecemeal mathematical representation of the anatomical femoral
surfaces;
FIGS. 5A-C are geometric analogs of femoral
FIG. 6 is a mathematical representation of a complete femoral component;
FIG. 7 is a side view of the femoral component showing the femoral peg;
FIG. 8 is a front view of the femoral component showing the long stem in
place;
FIG. 9 is a bottom view of the tibial component;
FIG. 10 is a perspective view of the tibial blades;
FIG. 11A is a tibial surface generated by sweeping the femoral component
through an average knee motion path;
FIG. 11B is a computer generated series of curves representing laxity
motion of a knee;
FIG. 11C is a computer generated superimposition of the laxity curves of
FIG. 11B onto the average knee motion of FIG. 11A;
FIGS. 12A and B illustrate a stabilized version of the present invention;
and
FIG. 13 illustrates an alternative means of stabilizing the tibial plateau
in accordance with the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to a method for designing joint
prosthesis comprising a male portion and a mated female portion having
articular surfaces for mating with the male portion in the full range of
positions of joint flexion. The female portion preferably has flexion
surfaces for mating throughout the joint movement during flexion, as well
as raised guiding-bearing surfaces to guide the joint through flexion and
to resist dislocation, thereby performing or supplementing the functions
of collateral or cruciate ligaments, and, depending on the joint function,
optionally an extension surface for mating with the male portion at
extension.
An important aspect of the present invention is that the femoral and tibial
components are totally designed by computer programs.
The invention in a preferred embodiment comprises a method for designing a
knee prosthesis consisting of two components, a femoral component and a
tibial plateau, which are mated and operable in conjunction along with the
natural members remaining after resection to simulate the natural movement
of a knee joint. However, the concepts of the present invention can be
applied to other joints as well.
FIGS. 1-3 illustrate the femoral component 10 (referred to as the femoral
component) of the present invention. FIG. 1 is an anterior view of a
condylar replacement total knee, fitted into a knee joint. FIG. 2 is a
side view, and FIG. 3 is an anterior view with the patella removed to show
the posterior cruciate liament. The femoral component 10 comprises a
lateral condyle 12, medial condyle 14, intramedullary stem 16 (see FIG.
12A), and a trochlear surface 18. As best shown in FIG. 1, the femoral
component 10 comprises extension surfaces (lateral) 20 and (medial) 22, as
well as flexion surfaces (lateral) 24 and (medial) 26.
Descriptions of femoral geometry have been provided by several authors.
See, e.g., Mensch, J. S. et al., "Knee Morphology As A Guide To Knee
Replacement", Clin. Orth. No. 112, October 1975, pp. 231-241. Profiles of
the femoral condyles in the sagittal plane were shown in 1972 (Seedhom, B.
B., et al., "Dimensions of the Knee", Annals of Rheumatic Disease, Vol.
31, pp. 54-58 (1972)), and modelled by various mathematical curves (Langa,
G. S., "Experimental Observations and Interpretations on the Relationship
Between the Morphology and Function of the Human Knee Joint", Acta Anat.,
Vol 55, pp. 16-38 (1963); Erkman, M. J. et al., "A Study of Knee Geometry
Applied to the Design of Condylar Prosthesis", Biomedical Engineering,
Vol. 9, pp. 14-17 (1974); and Rehder, U., "Morphometrical Studies on the
Symmetry of the Human Knee Joint: Femoral Condyles", Journal of
Biomechanics, Vol. 16, pp. 351-361 (1983)). However, the above data is
limited in its ability to describe the three-dimensional geometry of the
surfaces. Such description could have application in computer modelling of
the knee joint in order to study joint mechanics. Another area of
application is in knee prosthesis design and evaluation.
To design the femoral component of one form of the present invention,
piecewise mathematical analog of an average anatomical femoral surface
geometry was used. The preferred method of calculating the femoral surface
comprises the sectioning of embedded cadaver knees into twenty-five
sections. The sections were copied and digitized into a computer, using
thirty to forty points per section, with a greater point density around
the condylar surfaces. A typical set of sections viewed from the anterior
and lateral sides are shown in FIGS. 4, 4A and 4B.
FIG. 4 shows a view of the average femur as seen from the
anterior--lateral. In that computer model, there are twenty-five parallel
sagittal sections, each section having forty points. FIG. 4A shows front
and side views (note that front view seen on the right side of FIG. 4A has
only seventeen sections), and FIG. 4B shows a sketch of the sections from
the front. The information on average profiles and shapes of the bearing
surfaces was used to develop geometrical analog. By parametrising the
various regions of the bearing surfaces, a computer model was created
which is useful for prosthetic design.
Using the computerized average, it was determined that regions along the
posterior femoral condyles, critical to the mechanical function of the
knee, could best be described as spheroidal sections. Additional
geometrical analogs, including toroidal and conical surfaces, were used to
describe the bearing surfaces. This led to a mathematical model, an
important feature being that the three bearing surfaces, the lateral
condyle, the medial condyle, and the patella groove, are each
substantially parallel to one another in differing sagittal planes.
The femoral component is preferably constructed of an inert metal
alloy--stainless steel, cobalt-chromium alloy, for example, those sold
under the trademarks VITALLIUM or ZIMALLOY, or a titanium alloy being
suitable and preferred. The component may be formed by molding molten,
softened or powdered alloy metal, or by machining or otherwise shaping the
metal or other material, e.g., using computer numerical control (CNC). The
computer design lends itself to CNC machining of an all plastic knee or of
machine molds using CNC from which the knee can be made from injection
molding.
FIG. 5 represents a piecewise mathematical representation of the anatomical
femoral surfaces. This is the basis for the femoral component surface. The
surface is contained in a computer program, which will generate a surface
of required size and shape, by expanding, contracting, or distorting the
average surface.
One method contemplated is to take the overall dimensions of a patient's
natural joint, and then to distort the average surface which has been
stored, in three dimensions so as to approximate the three dimensional
size of the patient's joint, and then to make the prosthesis by CNC
(computer numerical control) machining techniques to arrive at a
prosthesis which will fit in the patient's system precisely as his natural
joint, but in which the articulating surfaces will conform operationally
to the surfaces generated by the computer synthesis of the average
surfaces. Another method is to develop a number of average surfaces
covering different size ranges, and then to select the nearest one in size
to the joint of the patient. FIG. 5A shows the geometrical analog of
femoral condyles, including the posterior 28, distal 30, anterior 32,
patella 34, and superior 36 regions. FIG. 5B is a geometrical analog of
condylar surfaces showing the lateral condylar, medial condylar, and
patellar bearing surfaces 12, 14, 18. FIG. 5C is a third geometric analog
of the condylar surfaces showing the spherical, toroidal, and conical
surface analogs, referred to by reference numerals 38, 40, and 42,
respectively.
The tibial plateau component 48 of the present invention is also shown in
FIGS. 1-3. The tibial plateau 48 includes lateral articular surface 50,
medial articular surface 52, and therebetween raised surface 54. As used
herein, "articular surface" refers to the part of the surface of a
component of the prosthesis which during normal joint movement is in
pressure receiving relation (either by direct contact or by near contact
with a lubricating medium therebetween) with another component. Thus in
the case of the tibial plateau 48, its articular surfaces 50, 52 are those
portions which contact (usually with a fluid film therebetween) the
femoral component. Articular surfaces 50, 52 include upwardly raised
guiding-bearing lateral surfaces 56, and upwardly raised guiding-bearing
medial surfaces 58. Within guiding-bearing surfaces 56 and 58 are
extension surfaces 60 and 62. Between guiding-bearing surfaces 56 and 58
and extension surfaces 60 and 62, respectively, are flexion surfaces
(lateral) 64 or (medial) 66. The flexion, extension, and guiding surfaces
56-66 overlap and coincide at certain points.
Preferably, the tibial plateau is constructed of an inert molded, high
density plastic, such as high density polyethylene. The CNC machining
advantages discussed above with respect to the femoral component also
apply to the manufacture of the tibial plateau component 48.
Tibial plateau 48 and femoral component 10 are shown together in a flexion
position in FIG. 2. In this view, the leg bones, namely the femur 68, the
tibia 70, and the fibula 72, are also shown. The cement, e.g., methyl
methacrylate 74, used to seat the tibial plateau 48, is also shown.
Femoral component 10 contacts the flexion surfaces 64, 66 of the tibial
plateau 48 at two or more lateral-medial spaced substantial points, which
lend stability to the joint during flexion. FIG. 3 illustrates the two
components in the position of extension, in which position three or more
lateral, medial, and anterior-posterior spaced substantial points of
contact exist between the opposed surfaces, whereby the joint is
effectively locked in extension.
The term "substantial points of contact" are used herein to describe the
contact betweeen two mating curved surfaces, the male member of which is
slightly smaller in curvature. In theory a point or line contact is made,
but in practice, when at least one member is resilient, more than a point
or line of contact results under pressure.
With the exception of the design of the femoral component, as decribed
above, and the details set forth hereinbelow, the prosthesis of the
present invention is similar to the Ewald prosthesis described in U.S.
Pat. No. 3,798,679, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein
by reference.
An important distinction and advancement over the prior art is the
incorporation of laxity concepts within the design parameters of the
tibial plateau. Laxity is generally defined as the partially restrained
motion or free play of a joint in a specified direction, before
substantial ligamentous restraint takes place at the extremes of motion.
Laxity can include linear or rotational translation in any of the three
mutually perpendicular coordinate axes. For purposes of the present
invention, laxity is only considered in anterior-posterior displacement,
medial-lateral displacement, and internal-external rotation, these being
the most significant.
The term "total laxity" is the total amount of laxity movement or rotation
which occurs between the limits of the applied force or torque. In the
natural joint, the limits of laxity are determined by the interaction of
the menisci, the ligaments, the femoral component, and the tibial plateau.
However, in a prostheses, the menisci and several ligaments are removed,
and the limits of laxity are determined by the natural components
remaining after resection acting cooperatively with forces introduced by
the contour of the prosthetic interface and the user's weight.
A simple tibial surface can be generated by the above-mentioned femoral
surface by simply moving the femoral surface about a fixed axis, producing
a cylindrical type of surface. However, to produce a surface which
incorporates features of anatomical knee motion, laxity characteristics,
and stability, the tibial plateau of the prosthesis must be contoured in
an non-anatomical way. Therefore, in accordance with the present
invention, the tibial plateau can be designed in different ways, for
example by incorporating the average three-dimensional femoral motions
along each of the three coordinate axes, plus internal-external rotation
and anterior-posterior displacement. The 3-dimensional motion of the femur
on the tibia is mathematically described by using data of anatomical knee
motion such as published by Kurosawa, et al (Kurosawa, H.; Walker, P. S.;
Abe, S.; Garg, A.; Hunter, T.; Journal of Biomechanics, 18:487-499, 1985).
The mathematical equations enable the femur to be positioned correctly on
the tibia as a function of knee flexion angle. A tibial surface generated
by sweeping the aforementioned femoral surface through an anatomical knee
motion path is shown in FIG. 11A.
Next, laxity, otherwise thought of as flexibility of the knee, was
considered. The laxity behaviour for the anatomical knee has been reported
by several authors including Markolf, et al (Markolf, K. L.; Bargar, W.
L.; Shoemaker, S. C.; Amstutz, H. C.; Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery,
63-A:570-585, 1981). The laxity curves show that the resistance to
displacement from the neutral position, steadily increase with the
displacement, the more so when the knee is weight-bearing. Cubic equations
to express this laxity behaviour were determined, and then the theory of
Walker (Walker, P. S.; Ch. 4, p. 202-204, Human Joints & Their Artificial
Replacements, publ. C. C. Thomas, Springfield, Ill., 1977) was used to
express this in terms of horizontal, rotational and vertical movements of
the femur on the tibia. A tibial surface generated by sweeping the femoral
surface through laxity curves at different flexion angles is shown in FIG.
11B Different motions can be superimposed, for example average knee motion
and average laxity, as shown in FIG. 11C. The tibial surfaces of the
present invention differ from hitherto known prostheses, because they have
built into them surface geometries which produce precise and
mathematically defined motion, laxity, and stability. These tibial
surfaces do not have simple geometries which can be defined by simple
radii, but have continuously changing radii all over the surface. These
surfaces of the present invention differ additionally from hitherto known
prostheses. These surfaces of the present invention, especially when they
include characteristics of normal knee motion such as rollback, are
especially advantageous. Motion along different paths will be smooth with
no sudden stops in any direction but gradually increasing resistance. Such
surfaces will readily accomodate different motion paths for different
activities and individuals, and will allow a degree of latitude in
surgical placement.
Further, the addition of laxity parameters as specifically defined above,
provides provide a narrow gap between the femoral component and the tibial
plateau laterally of the primary articular surface. This is advantageous
because it facilitates access to the articular surface of the synovial
fluid around the prosthesis, and also enables debris to be removed,
thereby improving the life and operation of the prosthesis.
The tibial plateau can be similarly made more versatile by replacing the
conventional stem blade with a design shown in FIGS. 9-10. The stem blades
of the present invention comprise transverse blades 76 and 78. A specially
deigned gap 80 between blades 76 allow a longer stem to be press fit
within, for situations calling for a long stem. FIG. 9 shows a bottom view
of the tibial component 48. The location of the blade fixation is shown
located anteriorly so as to be in line with the canal of the bone. Thus,
when a long stem is added, it goes directly down the canal.
FIG. 10 is a perspective view of the tibial blades. This provides fixation
for standard components, and gives resistance to shear forces and bending
moments in all planes. For added fixation, a long stem is pressed into the
space 80 between the blades.
FIG. 13 is another embodiment of the tibial fixation means. Instead of
using the arrangement shown in FIGS. 9 and 10, a tapered peg 86 can be
attached to the base of the tibial component 48. Onto peg 86 can be
cemented a longer stem 88 or a stem 90 having blades 92 extending
therefrom. Such an arrangement provides added flexibility in case of bone
loss or other situations.
FIGS. 12A and B illustrate a stabilized version of the standard condylar
knee. The femoral component has an intercondylar box 82 which receives a
raised part or post 84 of the tibial component. If the post 84 is about
half the height shown, then anterior-posterior stability is obtained. This
substitutes for the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments. If the post
is about the height shown, varus- valgus stability is also obtained,
substituting for the lateral and medial collateral ligaments.
Although only preferred embodiments of the invention are specifically
illustrated and described above, it will be appreciated that many
modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in
light of the above teachings and within the purview of the appended claims
without departing from the spirit and intended scope of the invention.
* * * * *
|
|
 |
|
 |
Description |
|
