 |
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a method for conducting a competition.
More particularly, the present invention relates to a method for
conducting a tournament which is more interesting, equitable and
competitive.
2. Description of the Prior Art
It is well known to conduct competitions in a wide variety of activities.
For example, it is common to conduct tournaments in athletic events such
as tennis, basketball, soccer, wrestling, baseball, fencing, hockey, etc.,
and in such non-athletic events as beauty contests, quiz shows, spelling
bees, etc. In many instances, tournament competitions are conducted at the
conclusion of a full schedule of competitions. For example, the NCAA is
well known for its post-season basketball tournament in which 64 teams are
selected from all Division I basketball teams to compete for the national
championship. Similarly, in professional basketball and hockey, teams
qualify for post-season competition based upon their regular season
performance.
In such prior art tournaments, it is common for competitors to be seeded
based upon their prior performances. Thus, the competitor with the best
record or best positional finish, e.g., first place, would be seeded first
whereas the tournament-qualifying competitor with the worst record or
positional finish would be seeded last. The seeding of tournament
competitors determines the matched opponents in the first round of the
tournament, and quite often for all succeeding rounds. Generally, in the
first round of the tournament, the first seed is matched against the last
seed, the second seed against the second-to-last seed, and so on, thereby
giving the top seeded competitors a decided advantage.
In such prior art tournaments, early tournament rounds are generally
non-competitive in that the competitors matched for play are of widely
diverse ability. As a result, quite often there is little spectator
interest in early tournament rounds. This low level of spectator interest
translates to reduced attendance and therefore lower gate revenue.
Moreover, television ratings are generally lower for early tournament
rounds which typically translate to lower revenues to tournament
organizers for broadcast rights.
Other prior art tournaments are conducted without seeding of competitors.
In unseeded tournaments, there is a risk that the two best competitors
will meet in the first round. The loser of this first round match is then
generally excluded from further tournament participation, thereby
depriving the tournament of one of its most competitive participants. The
loss of a top competitor early in a tournament can also have a negative
impact on spectator interest and tournament revenue at later stages of the
tournament Moreover, the loss of a top competitor in the first round of an
unseeded tournament, e.g., by losing to another top performer, prevents
this losing competitor from pursuing a top finish in the tournament, e.g.,
as a silver or bronze medalist This result can be extremely unfair to
tournament participants.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for conducting
a tournament which is more interesting and competitive at all tournament
levels It is a further object to provide a tournament method that is
equitable to tournament competitors, and that is more likely to match the
most-skilled competitors in the final tournament stage or stages,
regardless of first round match-ups.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a method for conducting athletic or
non-athletic competitions which involves:
(a) means for dividing competitors into a plurality of zones, wherein each
zone comprises four or eight lower stage groups, and wherein each lower
stage group comprises a plurality of competitors;
(b) means for collecting a first place finisher from one lower stage group
in each of said zones to form an intermediate group, whereby the first
place finishers in each of said lower stage groups are part of n
intermediate group, and wherein the number of intermediate groups is equal
to the number of lower stage groups;
(c) means for collecting all first place finishers from said intermediate
groups to form one or two final groups of competitors, wherein the number
of final groups is equal to one quarter the number of lower stage groups
in each zone;
(d) means for collecting second place finishers from:
(i) each of the lower stage groups in which one of the final group
competitors competed and
(ii) each of the intermediate stage groups in which one of the final group
competitors competed, to form one or two additional tournament groupings,
each additional tournament grouping comprising eight competitors, wherein
the number of additional tournament groupings is equal to one fourth the
number of lower stage groups in each zone, and wherein the second place
finishers from the lower stage group and from the intermediate stage group
in which a final group competitor competed are separated so as to be
matched against each other in said additional tournament grouping no
earlier than the last round therein;
(e) means for adding the first place finisher from each of said one or two
additional tournament groupings to a final group of competitors, such that
each final group of competitors comprises five competitors; and
(f) displaying the winner from said final group of competitors.
The present invention also provides for a competition for a regional
championship, e.g., of a continent, to be combined with the competition
described above. Thus, the invention provides means for collecting all of
the first place finishers in a zone, i.e., the first place finishers from
each of the lower stage groups in a zone, to form a final zone group.
Thus, if a zone comprises four lower stage groups, the final zone group
comprises four competitors, and if a zone comprises eight lower stage
groups, the final zone group comprises eight competitors. In the latter
case, the present method provides means for pairing the eight competitors
within the final zone group to form four elimination round matches, and
means for collecting the four winners from the elimination round matches
to form a reduced final zone group of four competitors. The method then
provides means for displaying the winner from the final zone group (in the
case of four lower stage groups) or the reduced final zone group (in the
case of eight lower stage groups).
In addition, the invention provides means for dividing six teams, each team
comprising players from countries where the same language is the primary
spoken language, into two groups, each group comprising three teams. The
method then provides means for pairing the first place finishers from each
group and means for pairing the second place finishers from each group,
and means for displaying the final positions of the teams.
The method of the present invention thus displays the final positions of
competitors from competitions that are more interesting and competitive,
and that are more equitable to participating competitors.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
As used in the drawings herein, the term "pretender" is meant to describe a
competitor in a competition of the present invention.
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a preferred tie-breaking means for the
competitions of the present method.
FIGS. 2 and 3 are score-tables for finals of zone championship competitions
(sport games).
FIGS. 4 and 5 are score-tables for finals of zone championship competitions
(non-sport games).
FIG. 6 is a score-table for an international soccer competition (Lingua
Cup) of the present invention.
FIGS. 7A-7H, 8A-8H, 9A-9D, 10A-10F, and 11A-11C are score-tables showing
various competitions of the present invention.
FIG. 12 is a schematic diagram showing the placement of competitors in an
additional tournament and final.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The method of the present invention may be used in conducting competitions
that are athletic or non-athletic in nature, and in competitions in which
the competitors are teams or individuals. For example, the present method
may be employed for team athletic events such as basketball, soccer,
baseball, hockey, etc., and for individual athletic events such as tennis,
wrestling, fencing, gymnastics, and the like. Examples of team
non-athletic events include quiz shows, academic competitions, e.g., math
team meets, etc. Examples of individual non-athletic competitions include
beauty contests, spelling bees, and the like. The present method is
particularly suitable for use in competitions which include competitors
from various geographic regions, e.g., Europe, America, Africa, and Asia.
In such instances, it is advantageous to use these geographic regions in
defining the zones which are discussed below.
The present method may be used for competitions which involve almost any
number of competitors. To avoid byes in the earliest stage of the
competition, however, it is preferred to have at least 36 competitors. As
will be apparent to one of ordinary skill, there is no upper limit to the
number of competitors that may be included in the present method.
The present method provides means for dividing the competitors into a
plurality of zones. The number of zones is not critical to the invention,
but generally there are from 3 to 8 zones, and preferably there are 4
zones. The competitors may be divided into zones according to any
criterion. For example, zones preferably comprise competitors who are from
the same geographic region.
Within each zone, competitors are divided into four or eight lower stage
groups. The division of competitors into lower stage groups may also be
accomplished based on the geographic location of competitors with
attention given to distributing competitors of different skill level into
each lower stage group. The number of competitors within each group is
also not critical. If the number of competitors assigned to each zone is
roughly equal, it may be desirable to divide competitors into lower stage
groups of relatively equal size. However, the present method does not
require groupings to be any minimum or maximum size. Typical groupings
contain at least three competitors.
Within a zone, it is also possible to collect competitors into two or three
subgroups. Typically, each subgroup comprises four or five competitors. If
competitors within a lower stage group are collected into two subgroups,
the present method may be provided with means to match the first place
finisher from the first subgroup against the first place finisher from the
second subgroup. The winner of this match between first place finishers
from the two subgroups is then the first place finisher for the lower
stage group to which the subgroups belonged, and the loser is the second
place finisher for the lower stage group.
If competitors within a lower stage group are collected into three
subgroups, the present method may be provided with means to collect the
first place finishers from each subgroup into a lower stage grouping. The
first place finisher from this lower stage group would thus advance to an
intermediate stage group and optionally a final zone group, e.g., for a
continent championship, as described below.
In sporting game competitions, each of the competitors within a lower stage
group competes twice against each other competitor in the lower stage
group, one time at each of the competitor's home stadium or arena. In most
other athletic non-game and non-athletic competitions, competitors
generally compete in a single round-robin competition in a single
location. In some athletic events, e.g., gymnastics, and some non-athletic
events, e.g., quiz shows, all competitors typically compete in a single,
all-inclusive competition.
The present method is typically provided with means to score the
competition results. Conventional scoring systems may be employed, e.g.,
for soccer two points may be awarded a winner, one point each to tying
competitors and zero points to a loser. However, in the case of soccer, a
preferred means for scoring competitions involves awarding 2.5 points to a
competitor who wins a match in regulation time, i.e., without entering an
overtime period. If a match is tied at the end of regulation time, the
number of points awarded to the overtime winner depends on the manner in
which the winner is determined. Thus, if a winning goal is scored during
an established sudden-death overtime period, e.g., 30 minutes, then the
winner is awarded 1.5 points. However, if the overtime winner is
established by some other means after the conclusion of the established
overtime period, e.g., by penalty shots, then the winner is awarded 1.0
points. In any event, the losing competitor in each match is awarded zero
points. This preferred scoring means more accurately reflects the degree
to which the winning competitor outperformed the losing competitor in the
match, and therefore will more accurately reflect the relative skill of a
group of competitors.
After the conclusion of the lower stage competitions, the position of each
competitor (with the exception of a lower stage group containing two
subgroups, as described above), is determined in each lower stage group by
the number of points awarded during the lower stage competitions. Thus,
the competitor with the most points is the first place finisher, the
competitor with the second highest point total is the second place
finisher, etc.
In the event two or more competitors are tied for any position,
tie-breaking means are employed. Although any tie-breaking means may be
employed, a preferred tie-breaking means is shown in FIG. 1. As shown
therein, the first criterion for determining a first or second place
finisher is the total number of points. If two competitors have the same
number of points, the first tie-breaker is the number of goals scored. If
both competitors scored the same number of goals in lower stage group
competitions, the second tie-breaker is the number of points earned by
each of the tied competitors in head-to-head competitions against
competitors having equal total points. If the tied competitors each earned
an equal number of points in head-to-head competition, the next
tie-breaker is the number of goals scored between tied competitors in
head-to-head competition. If this tie-breaker also fails to break a tie,
the final tie-breaker is by lot, e.g., by flipping a coin.
According to the present method, the first place finishers from each of the
lower stage groups within a zone may compete for a zone championship
(regional or continental championship). In the case of sporting game
competitions, if there are eight lower stage groups in each zone as shown
in FIG. 2, the present method provides means for randomly dividing the
eight first place finishers from the lower stage groups into four pairs.
Each of the paired competitors compete twice, once at the home field or
arena of each competitor. The winner from each of these pairs is
determined by the means shown in FIG. 1. The winners from each of the
pairs are collected into a zone championship group (regional or
continental championship). Thus, the zone championship comprises four
competitors. If the zone contained only four lower stage groups, as shown
in FIG. 3, the first place finishers from each of these lower stage groups
advance directly to the zone championship group.
The competitors in the zone championship group compete in a single
round-robin tournament. The positions of the competitors are determined
according to the criteria shown in FIG. 1. Otherwise, as shown in FIG. 4
(eight groups) and FIG. 5 (four groups), all the first place finishers are
collected directly in a final of the zone championship. These competitors
compete in a single round-robin competition and their final positions are
determined by the criteria shown in FIG. 1.
The present method also provides means for displaying the final positions
of the competitors in the zone championship group. The present method thus
allows for the combination of regional tournaments, e.g., continental
championships, with tournaments of larger scope, e.g., world
championships, by utilizing the same lower stage group competitions in
both tournaments, i.e., using the same eliminatory competitions.
The present method also provides means for collecting a first place
finisher from one lower stage group from each zone to form an intermediate
group. The number of competitors in each intermediate group is equal to
the number of zones, with one competitor in each intermediate group being
drawn from each zone. The number of intermediate groups formed according
to the present method depends on the number of lower stage groups in each
zone. If there are four lower stage groups in each zone, then four
intermediate groups are formed. However, if eight lower stage groups are
included in each zone, then eight intermediate groups are formed. The
first place finishers of lower stage groups are typically formed into
intermediate groups in a random fashion.
According to the present invention, means for collecting first place
finishers from the intermediate groups into one or more final groups is
provided. If there are four lower stage groups within each zone and
therefore four intermediate groups, then a single final group is formed
that comprises the four intermediate stage first place finishers and, as
described below, an additional tournament winner. However, if each zone
contains eight lower stage groups and therefore eight intermediate stage
groups are formed, then two final groups are formed in a random fashion,
each final group containing four intermediate group first place finishers
and one additional tournament winner, as described below.
The present method further provides means for collecting second place
finishers from:
(a) each of the lower stage groups in which one of the final group
competitors competed; and
(b) each of the intermediate stage groups in which one of the final group
competitors competed; to form one or two additional tournament groupings.
The number of additional tournament groupings is equal to one fourth the
number of lower stage groups in each zone. Thus, if there are eight lower
stage groups in each zone, then two additional tournament groupings are
formed. Each additional tournament grouping contains eight competitors.
The second place finishers are collected into additional tournament
groupings such that two second place finishing competitors, one from a
lower stage group and one from an intermediate stage group, who competed
in groups containing the same final group competitor would be matched no
earlier than the final round of the additional tournament. By way of
illustration, if Competitor A was the first place finisher both in Lower
Stage Group 1 and in Intermediate Group 3, and is therefore a final group
competitor, then the second place finishers in Lower Stage Group 1 and
Intermediate Group 3 are collected into an additional tournament grouping.
If there is more than one additional tournament grouping, it is determined
randomly whether these two second place finishers are grouped in the same
additional tournament grouping. However, in the event that they are
grouped in the same additional tournament grouping, and if the additional
tournament is conducted such that teams are eliminated from further
tournament competition based on match outcomes, e.g., a single elimination
tournament based on two competitions (one competition at the home field of
each competitor), then these two competitors are positioned within the
additional tournament grouping such that they meet in head-to-head
competition no earlier than the last round. The placement of competitors
in the additional tournaments is described in greater detail below with
reference to FIGS. 7-12.
The competitors within the additional tournament grouping compete in a
single elimination tournament, but each elimination round is based on two
competitions, one at the home field of each competitor. The collection of
competitors in additional tournament groupings gives these competitors a
fresh opportunity to get over an "unlucky fate" and to advance to the
final group of competitors.
The preset method provides means for adding the first place finisher or
finishers from the additional tournament grouping or groupings to the
final group or groups of competitors. Therefore, as set forth above, each
final group contains a total of five competitors which comprise four first
place finishers from intermediate groups and one first place finisher from
an additional tournament group. If there is more than one final group then
the first place finisher from an additional tournament grouping is placed
in the final group which does not contain the first place finisher from
its lower group stage or intermediate group.
The competitors in each final group compete in a single round-robin
competition. If there are two final groups, the top three finishers in the
first final group based on points and, if necessary, tie-breaking
criteria, compete once against each of the top three finishers in the
second final group. Thus, each of the top three finishers in each of the
two final groups participates in seven matches, i.e., four matches as part
of the single round-robin tournament and three additional matches against
the top three finishers in the other final group.
The competitor having the most points or the best tie-breaking position is
the winner of the competition. The second place finisher and third place
finisher are determined in the same way. Additional tournament formats for
use in establishing a winner from the final group or groups of competitors
will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art.
The present method displays the winning competitor, e.g., by lighting or
flashing the winning competitor's name on an electronic scoreboard or
other suitable displaying means. The final positions of other final group
competitors, e.g., second and third place finishers overall, may also be
displayed according to the present method.
The present method also provides means for randomly dividing six teams,
each team comprising players from countries where the same language is the
primary spoken language, into two groups as shown in FIG. 6. For example,
the team may comprise players who speak English, German, Italian, French,
Portuguese or Spanish. The teams within each group compete in a single
round-robin tournament and the first, second and third place finishers in
each group are determined by the criteria shown in FIG. 1. The present
method then provides means for pairing the first place finishers and the
second place finishers from each group, as also shown in FIG. 6. The
paired first place finishers compete in a single match to determine the
overall first place (winner) and second place (loser) finishers. The
paired second place finishers also compete in a single match to determine
the overall third place (winner) and fourth place (loser) finishers. The
method further provides means for displaying the final team positions,
i.e., first to fourth place finishers, of the competition. This
competition may be entitled a Lingua Cup.
The present method may be programmed using any computer language, e.g.,
BASIC, FORTRAN, COBOL, etc. for processing on a computer capable of
operating a program written in the language selected, e.g., an IBM
personal computer. The programming of the present method is well within
the skill of one of ordinary skill in the art using known computer
programming principles. The design of a suitable interface between the
computer program and means for displaying the tournament winner is also
well within the skill of one of ordinary skill in the art.
The present method is further illustrated by reference to the score-tables
of FIGS. 7-11, each of these figures is broken into a series of component
figures. Thus, FIG. 7 comprises FIGS. 7A-7H, FIG. 8 comprises FIGS. 8A-8H,
FIG. 9 comprises FIGS. 9A-9D, FIG. 10 comprises FIGS. 10A-10F, and FIG. 11
comprises FIGS. 11A-11C.
FIG. 7 shows a score-table for a soccer competition which comprises three
zones, a European zone, an American zone and an African-Asian zone. The
European and American zones each comprise eight lower stage groups. As
shown in FIG. 7A, European group 1 (EU-1) contains 4 competitors and
European group 2 (EU-2) contains 5 competitors, while American group 1
(AM-1) contains 4 competitors and American group 2 (AM-2) contains 3
competitors. The remaining lower stage groups within the European and
American zones are shown schematically in FIGS. 7A and 7C, i.e., only the
top two competitors are shown in each group. However, it is to be
understood that these lower stage groups each contain more than two
competitors.
The first place finisher in each of these lower stage groups qualifies for
an intermediate group. Each intermediate group is formed randomly. Thus,
as shown in FIGS. 7A, 7C, and 7E, the first place finisher in lower stage
group EU-2 advances to intermediate group E by lead line 110 and the first
place finisher in group AM-6 advances to intermediate group E by lead line
120.
In the African-Asian zone, each lower stage group is broken into subgroups,
as shown in FIGS. 7B and 7D. African group 1 (AF-1) is broken into 3
subgroups, subgroups 1 and 2 each containing 4 competitors and subgroup 3
containing 5 competitors. The remaining lower stage groups in this zone
are each broken into two subgroups.
As shown in FIG. 7B, in each subgroup to lower stage group AF-1, after
competitions on the home field of each competitor, the first place
finisher qualifies for a three team lower stage group. The winner in this
lower stage group advances to intermediate group E (FIG. 7E) as shown by
lead line 115. However, in the remaining lower stage groups within the
African-Asian zone, the first place finishers in the first subgroup
advance to compete against the first place finisher in the second subgroup
twice, once on the home field of each competitor. The winner in each of
these head-to-head competitions advances to an intermediate group (none
pictured).
As shown in FIGS. 7E and 7G, the first place finisher in intermediate group
E advances to final group A by lead line 130. This competitior originally
competed in the European zone in lower stage group EU-2. Thus, the second
place finisher in group EU-2 qualifies for an additional tournament, as
does the second place finisher in intermediate group E. These competitors
advance to Additional Tournament (Section II) in FIG. 7H, as shown by lead
lines 105 and 125, respectively. These two competitors are positioned with
the additional tournament such that they would not directly compete until
the final stage of the additional tournament.
The positioning of competitions within the additional tournament is
determined based on the criteria set forth in FIG. 12. As shown therein,
in sporting game competitions wherein each zone contains 8 lower stage
groups, the final group positions for first place finishers in the
intermediate groups are numbered from 1 to 4 and from 6 to 9 (see FIGS. 7G
and 7H). The first place finisher from intermediate group E is randomly
placed in position 3 (Final Group A). As shown in FIG. 12, if the second
place finisher from intermediate group E is placed in an additional
tournament position from 9 to 12, then the second place finisher from
lower stage EU-2 is placed in an additional position from 13 to 16.
Conversely, if the second place finisher from intermediate group E is
placed in position 13 to 16, then the second place finisher from lower
stage EU-2 is placed in position 9 to 12. Thus, as shown in FIG. 7H, since
the first place finisher from intermediate group E has been placed in
position 3, the second place finisher from Group EU-2 has been placed in
additional tournament position 10 and the second place finisher from
intermediate group E has been placed in position 13.
The winner from the Additional Tournament (Section II) is placed in
position 5 of Final Group B (overall position 10). Thus, if the second
place finisher from lower stage group EU-2 or intermediate group E
qualifies for a final group by winning this Additional Tournament, that
competitor will be placed in the opposite final group from the final group
containing the first place finisher against whom it has already competed.
FIG. 8 shows a score-table for a sporting game competition. The competitors
are divided into four zones and each zone contains eight lower stage
groups. The lower stage groups in Zone IV are each divided into subgroups;
Lower Stage Groups IV-1 and IV-5 are each divided into three subgroups
while the remaining six lower stage groups in Zone IV are each divided
into two subgroups.
The first place finishers in Lower Stage Groups I-4, II-5, III-2, and IV-5
are each shown advancing to Intermediate Group E by lead lines 215, 210,
220 and 225, respectively. The first place finisher in Intermediate Group
is shown advancing to Final Group A by lead line 235 (position 2). Thus,
the second place finishers in Lower Stage Group III-2 and Intermediate
Group A are shown advancing to Additional Tournament (Section II) by lead
lines 205 and 230, respectively, and are placed in positions 10 and 13,
respectively.
FIG. 9 shows a second score-table for a sporting game competition, the
competitors being divided into four zones and each zone being divided into
four lower stage groups. The first place finishers in Lower Stage Groups
I-3, II-3, III-2 and IV-1 are shown advancing to Intermediate Group B by
lead lines 315, 310, 320 and 325, respectively. The first place finisher
in Intermediate Group B advances to the sole Final Group (lead line 335).
The second place finishers from Lower Stage Group III-2 and Intermediate
Group B advance to the sole Additional Tournament by lead lines 305 and
330, respectively, and are placed in positions 5 and 3, respectively.
FIG. 10 shows a score-table for sporting non-game competitions and
non-sporting competitions. The competitors (pretenders) are divided into
six zones and each zone contains eight lower stage groups. The first place
finishers from Lower Stage Groups I-4, II-6, III-8, IV-1, V-5, and VI-8
are shown advancing to Intermediate Group A. The first place finisher in
Intermediate Group A is shown advancing to the sole Final Group (position
2). The second place finishers in Lower Stage Group II-6 and Intermediate
Group A are shown advancing to Additional Tournament (Section I). The
positioning of competitors within the additional tournaments is not
critical for the sporting non-game competitions and non-sporting
competitions of FIG. 10 (For details, see FIG. 12).
FIG. 11 shows a second score-table for sporting non-game competitions and
non-sporting competitions. The competitors are divided into six zones and
each zone contains four lower stage groups. The first place finishers in
Lower Stage Groups I-2, II-1, III-2, IV-4, V-2 and VI-3 are shown
advancing to Intermediate Group A. The first place finisher in
Intermediate Group A is shown advancing to the sole Final Group. Thus, the
second place finishers in Lower Stage Group II-1 and Intermediate Group A
advance to the sole Additional Tournament.
* * * * *
|
|
 |
|
 |
Description |
|
