|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed is:
1. An alignment system for an ophthalmic instrument comprising,
(a) illuminating means for illuminating an eye with diverging rays from a
light source,
(b) a first detecting means for defining a first light detecting area, said
light detecting means including a first pinhole occluder to pass a small
bundle of reflected rays producing a first signal identifying the XY
location of reflected light on said first area,
(c) a second detecting means for defining a second light detecting area,
said second detecting means including a second pinhole occluder to pass a
small bundle of reflected rays and producing a second signal identifying
the XY location of reflected light on said second area,
(d) means evaluating said first and second signals for providing a third
signal, and
(e) means for selectively positioning the instrument relative to the eye
responsive to said third signal.
2. The alignment system according to claim 1, wherein said positioning
means includes manually operated means for moving the instrument and
display means for presenting a visual indication of the instrument
position.
3. The alignment system according to claim 2, wherein said illumination
means includes two light paths, one of said two paths directing light
toward an eye from one side and the other of said two paths directing
toward the eye from the other side.
4. The alignment system according to claim 3, wherein said first detecting
means is impinged by reflected light from said first light path and said
second detecting means is impinged by reflected light from said second
light path.
5. The alignment system according to claim 1, wherein each of said first
and second detecting means includes a positive lens adjacent said pinhole
occluder.
6. The alignment system according to claim 2, further including
electro-optical means for producing a fourth signal representing a macro
image of the eye.
7. The alignment system according to claim 1, wherein said evaluating means
includes storage means for retaining information representing first and
second reference locations on said first and second areas respectively,
said reference locations symbolizing first and second locations impinged
by reflected light when the instrument is positioned at a chosen position
relative to an eye and said third signal includes a comparison of said
first and second signals with said information.
8. The alignment system according to claim 7, wherein said positioning
means includes manually operated means for moving the instrument and
display means for presenting a visual indication of the instrument
position.
9. The alignment system according to claim 8, wherein said illumination
means includes two light paths, one of said two paths directing light
toward an eye from one side and the other of said two paths directing
toward the eye from the other side.
10. The alignment system according to claim 9, wherein said first detecting
means is impinged by reflected light from said first light path and said
second detecting means is impinged by reflected light from said second
light path.
11. The alignment system according to claim 10, wherein each of said first
and second detecting means includes a positive lens adjacent said pinhole
occluder.
12. The alignment system according to claim 11, further including
electro-optical means for producing a fourth signal representing a macro
image of the eye.
13. The alignment system according to claim 11, wherein said first
detecting means is located on said other side and said second detecting
means is located on said one side.
14. The alignment system according to claim 1, wherein said positioning
means includes electromechanical means for moving the instrument.
15. The alignment system according to claim 14, wherein said illumination
means includes two light paths, one of said two paths directing light
toward an eye from one side and the other of said two paths directing
toward the eye from the other side.
16. The alignment system according to claim 15, wherein said first
detecting means is impinged by reflected light from said first light path
and said second detecting means is impinged by reflected light from said
second light path.
17. The alignment system according to claim 16, wherein said first
detecting means is located on said other side and said second detecting
means is located on said one side.
18. The alignment system according to claim 17, wherein each of said first
and second detecting means includes a positive lens adjacent said pinhole
occluder.
19. The alignment system according to claim 18, wherein further including
display means for presenting a visual indication of the instrument
position.
20. The alignment system according to claim 19, further including
electro-optical means for producing a fourth signal representing a macro
image of the eye.
21. The alignment system according to claim 20, wherein said evaluating
means includes storage means for retaining information representing first
and second reference locations on said first and second areas
respectively, said reference locations symbolizing first and second
locations impinged by reflected light when the instrument is positioned at
a chosen position relative to an eye and said third signal includes a
comparison of said first and second signals with said information.
22. The alignment system according to claim 16, wherein said first
detecting means is located on said one side and said second detecting
means is located on said other side.
23. An alignment system for an ophthalmic instrument comprising,
(a) first illuminating means for providing light having rays from a source
diverging to an eye from one side thereof,
(b) second illuminating means for providing light having rays from a source
diverging to an eye from the other side thereof,
(c) detecting means for defining an area, said light detecting means
including an occluder having two spaced pinholes to pass two small bundles
of reflected rays, one of said bundles comprising rays from said first
illuminating means and the other of said bundles comprising rays from the
second of said illuminating means for producing first and second signals
identifying the XY location of reflected light passing through each of
said pinholes on said area,
(d) means evaluating said signals for providing an output signal, and
(e) means for selectively positioning the instrument relative to the eye
responsive to said output signal.
24. The alignment system according to claim 23, wherein said detecting
means includes a positive lens adjacent said occluder.
25. The alignment system according to claim 24, further including
electro-optical means for producing a video signal representing a macro
image of the eye.
26. The alignment system according to claim 24, wherein said positioning
means includes manually operated means for moving the instrument and
display means for presenting a visual indication of the instrument
position.
27. The alignment system according to claim 26, further including
beamsplitter means for producing a macro image of the eye using a portion
of the light from at least one of said first and second illuminating
means. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
It is frequently desirable to be able to repeatedly position an instrument,
such as an ophthalmic instrument, in a predetermined spatial location
relative to an object. For example, a non-contact tonometer must be
carefully positioned relative to an eye under test in order to obtain an
accurate intraocular pressure reading. It is desirable that the operator
be able to position the instrument rapidly, since non-contact tonometers
are frequently used to screen a large number of individuals for early
warning signs of glaucoma by measuring their intraocular pressure.
Instruments, such as non-contact tonometers, must be positioned not only
relative to the eye laterally, but also spaced a proper distance axially
from the eye. In such instruments, the patient normally places his
forehead against a rest and his chin in a cup-like support. The operator
then moves the instrument towards the eye to be tested, while observing
various indicia until the predetermined location relative to the eye under
test is achieved as indicated by the indicia.
The alignment system of the first commercial non-contact tonometer is
disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,756,073, issued Sept. 1973 to Lavallee et al.
The optical system included a projected target, which the operator
centered inside an aiming reticle by looking through an eyepiece, in order
to obtain correct lateral positioning. The proper distance from the eye
under examination was achieved by moving the instrument toward the
patient's eye until the image of the reflected target was observed to be
sharply focused. Since operator's were aware that they would not be able
to observe the eye through the optical system during the alignment
process, they usually performed an initial positioning of the instrument
by observing the location of the instrument relative to the eye from the
side, while moving the instrument into an approximated proper position.
After approximated positioning, the operator then looked through the
eyepiece to obtain accurate positioning of the instrument. This procedure
avoided inadvertent contact with the eye. A light detector was used to
verify the operator's correct alignment before testing.
The miniaturization of electronic components and particularly those
relating to television, i.e., cameras and monitors, has permitted
adaptation of earlier optical systems to permit the operator to observe
the positioning indicia on a CRT screen. U.S. Pat. No. 4,665,923, issued
May 19, 1987 is an example of such an alignment system and includes three
optical subsystems. Two of the optical subsystems are symmetrically
disposed about the instrument axis and provide visible indicia indicating
the position of the instrument relative to a predetermined location. The
third optical subsystem is used to provide the operator with a macro image
of the eye. All of the embodiments disclosed in the patent, as well as the
commercial product utilizing disclosed concepts, present the three images
to a single observation means, i.e. image pickup tube 53. It is readily
apparent that the patented system has the distinct disadvantage that
proper adjustment can only be achieved by meticulous adjustment of each
component of the two symmetrically disposed systems and manufacturing all
components to close tolerances. For example, the first embodiment requires
precise alignment of eight reflective surfaces in the two alignment
optical subsystems, and even the simplest system, that shown in FIGS. 9
and 10, requires precision alignment of five reflective surfaces.
Obviously, the dimensions of each component as well as the mounting
thereof and spacing therebetween are extremely critical. An additional
disadvantage of the disclosed optical systems is the requirement that at
least four of the reflective elements be beam dividers. This substantially
reduces the amount of original illumination that can be presented to the
image pickup tube. A further disadvantage of the disclosed systems is that
optically presenting three separate images to a single camera tube or CCD
array causes the macro image of the eye to be washed out or at least very
faint. Similar to the earlier system, a spot detector was used to verify
correct alignment by the operator before testing in all of the disclosed
embodiments.
The criticality in alignment is partly due to the use of a "spot" detector
to verify alignment. It is only after light has passed through or been
reflected by numerous elements that the spot or spots are evaluated to
determine how much light is falling on the detector. introducing errors
because of alignment or quality. Another factor affecting the system
adversely is the quality of the optics required. Since the disclosed
system projects a target image that is imaged on the observation means and
the detector, the quality of the final images is controlled by the quality
and alignment of all the intervening optical components.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,705,045, issued Nov. 10, 1987, discloses a tonometer
alignment system having two oblique target projection systems that
re-image the targets through an imaging optical system that is parallel to
the discharge tube axis. Only imaging light that is reflected from the eye
parallel to the imaging optical system axis is imaged on the detector,
with both images being superimposed when the tonometer is aligned properly
.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION AND
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
It is an object of the present invention to significantly reduce the number
of optical elements requiring critical positioning in an optical alignment
system. It is a further object of the present invention to provide an
optical alignment system presenting a major portion of the initial
illumination to the detector.
It is a still further object of the present invention to provide a clear
image of the object relative to which the instrument is being aligned.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide an
electronic alignment of an ophthalmic instrument.
A still further object of the present invention is to provide an alignment
verification system that does not require additional detectors.
A still further object of the present invention is to provide a macro view
of the eye without a light source in addition to that used for alignment.
It is a still further object of the present invention to automatically,
i.e. electro-mechanically, align a test instrument using information
provided by at least one CCD array.
Briefly, the present invention includes two light sources for reflecting
spots from opposite sides of a spherical object, such as an eye. The
reflected images are directed to at least one position sensitive detector,
such as a CCD array. The signal produced by such a detector indicates the
location of the image on the light sensitive area. Alignment of the optics
may be achieved electronically by positioning the instrument in a
predetermined location relative to the spherical object and storing the
position of the spot as a reference location. The position of the
instrument at any future time can then be presented relative to that
stored reference location. Alternatively, the system can be aligned by
moving each array normal to the light path until the spot is centered on
both arrays when the instrument is properly positioned. In the latter
case, the signal can simply be sent to a monitor to indicate the position
of the instrument relative to the eye or other test object. In the former
case, the signal is modified to treat the stored location as if it were
the center of the CRT screen. In both cases, the signal sent to the CRT
can also be evaluated electronically to verify that the instrument is
correctly aligned before conducting a test.
A separate image tube or CCD array is used for a macro image of the eye, if
desired. The macro optical system is designed to provide an image of the
eye which appears sharp and uniformly illuminated. Illumination reflected
from the eye by the alignment system is usually sufficient for the macro
imaging system when the system of the preferred embodiment is utilized.
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an ophthalmic instrument of a type suitable
for use with the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a diagrammatical view of a first embodiment of the present
invention;
FIG. 3 is a diagrammatical view of a second embodiment of the present
invention;
FIG. 4 is a diagrammatical view of a third embodiment of the present
invention;
FIG. 5 is an optical diagram of the first embodiment of the present
invention; and
FIGS. 6 and 7 are block diagrams for explaining electronics supporting the
present invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Referring to FIG. 1, an ophthalmic instrument shown generally at 1, has a
base 2 with a frame 3 to provide a steadying rest for the head of a
patient. The test mechanism (not shown) of instrument 1 is contained
within housing 4 movably mounted on base 2. Member 5 represents a portion
of the instrument to be positioned in a predetermined relationship to the
patient's eye. To accomplish this relationship, the operator uses joystick
6 to move housing 4 three dimensionally on base 2, while watching the
resulting movement of symbols (not shown) relative to reticle 7 on screen
8. When the operator has achieved alignment by moving housing 4 until the
symbols are contained within or superimposed on reticle 7, he presses
button 9 on joystick 6 to initiate the desired test.
Referring to FIG. 2, eye 10 is flooded with light on one side of its axis
12 by light from source 14 and on the other side of its axis with light
from source 16. Sources 14 and 16 may conveniently be LEDs emitting light
in the infrared region. The advantage of infrared illumination resides in
the insensitivity of the human eye to the infrared region. This avoids any
discomfort, when high levels of radiation are required. Center ray 18 from
source 14 is reflected from cornea vertex 20 along path 22 and
sequentially through pinhole occluder 24, and lens 26 to CCD array 28.
Similarly, center ray 30 of source 16 is reflected from cornea vertex 20
along path 32 and sequentially through pinhole occluder 34 and lens 36 to
CCD array 38. A small bundle of rays closely adjacent to center rays 18
and 30 will remain substantially parallel thereto and pass along with the
respective center ray through the respective pinhole occluder. A portion
of the remaining light from each of sources 14 and 16 is reflected toward
lens 40 to produce an image of eye 10 on video image detector 44. In the
case of a non-contact tonometer, lens 40 is located behind air-pulse
discharge tube 42.
The alignment system components may be conveniently mounted on plate 46
which has a plurality of mounting members 48 for holding sources 14 and
16; pinhole occluders 24 and 34; lenses 26 and 36; CCD arrays 28 and 38;
objective lens 40 and video image detector 44. One advantage of the
present invention which may be realized is that mounting members 48 do not
require precise machining to close tolerances in order to provide exact
angles and dimensions, since normal variations may be corrected
electronically rather than optically. Electronic correction is achieved by
positioning the instrument, containing the alignment system of the present
invention, in the chosen relationship to the object such as a replica of a
human eye. If the spot produced by occluders 24 and 34 is relatively
close, e.g. <0.1 mm, to the center of the respective arrays, the XY
location of the spot is conveniently stored in a device such as an EEROM.
However, gross errors may be compensated for by moving the CCD to a new
position in a plane normal to the respective paths 22 and 32. The
reference locations (the locations of the respective spots on the CCD
arrays) are thereafter considered to be the "center" of the respective CCD
array.
Referring now to FIG. 3, another embodiment of the present invention is
illustrated. Light from sources 14 and 16 is reflected back from corneal
surface 120 in the same general direction from which it came along paths
122 and 132, respectively to CCD arrays 28 and 38. In other respects, this
embodiment operates in substantially the same manner as the embodiment of
FIG. 2.
FIG. 4 illustrates still another embodiment. Light from sources 14 and 16
is reflected by the respective sides of cornea 120 along paths 222 and 232
toward objective 20. Beam splitter 250 diverts a portion of the light
toward occluder 224 having two pinholes 252 and 254. Light passing through
pinholes 252 and 254 is imaged by lens 226 on CCD array 228. In this
embodiment, sources 14 and 16 are alternately strobed in order for CCD
array 228 to identify which of sources 14 and 16 produced the spot being
observed.
Referring again to FIG. 2, signals identifying the XY location of the spots
on CCD arrays 28 and 38 are delivered to CCD evaluating electronics 56 by
leads 58 and 60. Electronics 56 compares the reported XY position of the
spot to the stored reference location for each CCD array. An output from
electronics 56 representing the location of the spot relative to the
reference location is provided to display electronics 62 which in turn
drives CRT 66 through leads 64 to provide symbols on CRT 66. The signal
from video image detector 44 is similarly provided to display electronics
62 through lead 68 in order to provide a macro image of the eye on CRT 66.
The location of the spot on a CCD array can be identified conveniently
using a raster sweep of the CCD pixel signals. The signal and location
values of the first pixel are stored until a higher signal value is
encountered during the sweep. Each time a higher signal value is
encountered, the new pixel signal and location values are stored replacing
the values previously stored until the sweep is complete. The location
values stored at the end of the sweep identify the center of the spot on
the respective CCD array. If a minimum signal threshold is set, artifacts,
such as glare spots that can result from illumination for the macro view,
are ignored by the system. When an optical system of the type illustrated
by FIG. 4 is used, the timing of the raster sweep of CCD array 228 is
synchronized with the strobe of sources 14 and 16 in order that even
raster sweeps relate to one source and odd raster sweeps to the other.
A preferred optical system according to FIG. 2 is diagrammatically
presented in FIG. 5 and has the following values:
______________________________________
Ele- Index of
ment Radius Thickness Spacing Refraction
______________________________________
14
S1 = 55.0
20
S2 = 60.0
24 D1= 0.5 T1 = 0.5
S3 = 0.5
R1= 30.489
26 T2 = 3.00 N1 = 1.5168
R2= -30.489
S4 = 60.0
28
16
S5 = 55.0
20
S6 = 60.0
34 D2= 0.5 T3 = 0.5
S7 = 0.5
R3= 30.489
36 T4 = 3.00 N2 = 1.5168
R4= -30.489.
S8 = 60.0
38
20
S9 = 12.30
42
S10 = 87.7
R5= 50.813
40 T5 = 5.00 N3 = 1.5168
R6= -50.813
S11 = 100.0
44
______________________________________
wherein, radii, R1 to R6, thicknesses, T1 to T5, spacings, S1 to S11,
pinhole diameters, D1 and D2, are in mm; radii having their center of
curvature on the eye 10 side of the lens are indicated by a minus (-)
sign; and indexes of refraction, N1 to N3, are absolute values. The
pinhole-lens combinations can be replaced by small diameter lenses if
desired. The model Texas Instruments TC211 CCD array is suitable for
practicing this invention.
The amount of instrument movement necessary to obtain distance (S9) of
object 10 from component 42 of the instrument being aligned can easily be
calculated using the location value related to movement in a direction
parallel to the plane containing the optical elements of the alignment
system obtained from each CCD array. For example, if .alpha.=45.degree.
and .alpha.'=42.degree. and x and x' are the relative locations in the
directions indicated by the arrows labeled x and x' in FIG. 5,
.DELTA.S9=(x-X)-(x'-X'), where X and X' are the reference locations for
the respective CCD array. The amount of movement can be presented two
dimensionally, for example on the CRT, by using one symbol for the
horizonal (x) axis and another for the vertical (y) axis. The space
between the symbols can be used to represent .DELTA.S9. When .DELTA.S9=0,
the two symbols are superimposed. A simpler and more user-friendly
procedure is the use of a cursor which moves above the screen center, if
the instrument is too far from the object and below the screen center, if
the instrument is too close. The cursor type of presentation is preferred
because it has several advantages. One advantage is the ease with which
the user can recognize whether the instrument is too close or too far
away. Another advantage is that the x and y positions can be displayed by
means that do not require superimposition of symbols to indicate correct
positioning. For example, a narrow vertical line can be used to represent
the relative horizonal position and a narrow horizonal line to indicate
the relative vertical position, while the cursor indicates the relative
distance from the object. Prior art alignment systems did not permit a
choice of display formats.
Referring now to FIG. 6, signals from timing generator 350 drive x/y
counters 352, the raster sweep of CCD array 354 and timing of A/D
converter 358. Each pixel signal is amplified by amplifier 356, sent to
A/D converter 358, whose output is evaluated by peak detector 360. The
outputs of x/y counters 352 are stored by latches 362, each time peak
detector 360 signals a new high for the pixel signals from CCD array 354.
Obviously, each array requires an amplifier, A/D converter, peak detector
and output latches. The outputs of latches 362 are evaluated at the end of
each raster sweep by alignment and calibration electronics 364 which
updates operator display 366. If an automatic alignment system is desired,
motor controllers 368 and motors 370, 372 and 374 can be added as shown in
FIG. 7. The value of .DELTA.z is determined as explained previously for
the determination of .DELTA.S9,
##EQU1##
These .DELTA. values are provided to motor controllers 368 by alignment
and calibration electronics 364 to position the system until all three
.DELTA.'s=0.
* * * * *
|
|
|
|
|
Description  |
|