WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Adaptive waveform radar    
United States Patent4901082   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/4901082.html
Inventor(s)Schreiber; Heinz H. (Centerport, NY); O'Connor; Martin G. (Massapequa, NY)
AbstractPrior art radar systems do not adapt the transmitted signal to avoid the interference bands but only filter the unadaptive receiver signal to eliminate the interference with resulting loss in detectability and distortion that in turn causes loss in resolution and increased ambiguity. The present invention allows a radar system to operate in an electromagnetic environment where co-channel narrow band interference is present, without loss of detectability, resolution and ambiguity. The present invention system adapts the radar transmitted signal so that its spectral energy is significant only in the interference free portions of the radar channel. It next adapts the receiver to detect this transmitted spectrum and then equalizes the signal by means of transversal equalizer coefficients to reduce distortions to the signal sidelobes.



 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History
Drawing from US Patent 4901082
Adaptive waveform radar - US Patent 4901082 Drawing
Adaptive waveform radar
Inventor     Schreiber; Heinz H. (Centerport, NY); O'Connor; Martin G. (Massapequa, NY)
Owner/Assignee     Grumman Aerospace Corporation (Bethpage, NY)
Patent assignment
All assignments
Publication Date     February 13, 1990
Application Number     07/272,374
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     November 17, 1988
US Classification     342/89 342/162 342/192 342/196
Int'l Classification     G01S 007/34
Examiner     Moskowitz; Nelson
Assistant Examiner     Sotomayor; John B.
Attorney/Law Firm     Pollock, VandeSande & Priddy
Address
Parent Case    
Priority Data    
USPTO Field of Search     342/89 342/159 342/160 342/195 342/196 342/16 342/13
Patent Tags     adaptive waveform radar
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
2881321



[0 after 0 votes]
3039092



[0 after 0 votes]
3044060



[0 after 0 votes]
3050726



[0 after 0 votes]
3325736



[0 after 0 votes]
3618094



[0 after 0 votes]
4752969
Rilling
455/278.1
Jun,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4736460
Rilling
455/283
Apr,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4608569
Dickey, Jr.
342/384
Aug,1986

[0 after 0 votes]
4578676
Harrison, Jr.
342/89
Mar,1986

[0 after 0 votes]
4568938
Ubriaco
342/87
Feb,1986

[0 after 0 votes]
4476575
Franke
455/76
Oct,1984

[0 after 0 votes]
4408332
Sari
375/232
Oct,1983

[0 after 0 votes]
4317221
Toya
455/76
Feb,1982

[0 after 0 votes]
4237461
Cantrell
342/194
Dec,1980

[0 after 0 votes]
4218678
Fowler
342/22
Aug,1980

[0 after 0 votes]
4207624
Dentino
367/135
Jun,1980

[0 after 0 votes]
4204211
Cavelos
342/380
May,1980

[0 after 0 votes]
4137532
Taylor, Jr.
342/93
Jan,1979

[0 after 0 votes]
4003054
Goldstone
342/174
Jan,1977

[0 after 0 votes]
3680105
Goldstone
342/194
Jul,1972

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


We claim:

1. A radar system for operating in an electromagnetic environment including in-band and out-of-band interferences, comprising:

means for sampling the environment to provide a spectral electromagnetic profile representative of the environment;

processor means for obtaining from the profile an optimal channel for the environment and for generating a receiver matched filter corresponding to the channel and equalizer coefficients from responsive pulses, the optimal channel having an optimum center frequency and maximum channel bandwidth with fewest in-band interferences;

means for receiving an echo of a target signal transmitted to the environment;

means for multiplying the frequency spectrum of the echo with the matched filter and for notching out the interferences in the frequency spectrum;

means for transforming the interference free frequency spectrum into a responsive pulse to be transmitted to the processor means;

wherein the processor means, using the responsive pulse, calculates transversal equalizer filter coefficients for reducing temporal sidelobes of the responsive pulse to effect an interference free signal having a desirable main lobe to sidelobe ratio.

2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the sampling means comprises an automatic channel monitor that continually examines the environment for updating the spectral electromagnetic profile representative thereof.

3. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the multiplying means comprises a matched filter having frequency coefficients for eliminating the interferences from the frequency spectrum of the received echo.

4. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the transforming means comprises an inverse Fast Fourier Transformer.

5. The apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising:

a Fast Fourier Transformer for converting the echo of the target signal into its corresponding frequency spectrum.

6. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the processor means further generates from the profile waveform parameters to be used for generating test target signals.

7. The apparatus according to claim 6, further

means using the waveform parameters for synthesizing the test target signals;

wherein the test target signals are transmitted to the environment when the radar system is activated to transmit signals thereto and are fed to the receiving means for recursive calculations to generate an optimal main lobe to sidelobe ratio for the interference free signal.

8. In a radar system operating in an electromagnetic environment including in-band and out-of-band interferences, a method of maintaining signal detectability, optimizing resolution and restoring non-ambiguous performance for the system, comprising the steps of:

sampling the environment;

estimating from the sampled environment an electromagnetic profile including the interferences;

determining from the profile an optimal channel for the environment and channel transmit waveform parameters, the channel having an optimum center frequency and maximum channel bandwidth with fewest in-band interferences;

generating a receiver matched filter corresponding to the determined optimum channel;

transmitting a test target signal based on the waveform parameters into the environment;

receiving an echo of the target signal and converting the same into a corresponding frequency spectrum;

multiplying the frequency spectrum with the matched filter for notching out the interferences in the signal spectrum;

compressing the multiplied frequency spectrum into a responsive pulse; and

utilizing the responsive pulse to calculate transversal equalizer filter coefficients for reducing temporal sidelobes of the responsive pulse to realize an uncontaminated pulse signal with a desirable main lobe to sidelobe ratio.

9. The method of claim 8, further comprising the step of:

repeating the utilizing step until an optimal main lobe to sidelobe ratio is obtained.

10. The method of claim 8, wherein the sampling step comprises the step of:

continually updating the sampling of the environment.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the generating step comprises the steps of:

generating different matched filters in response to different electromagnetic profiles effected from environmental sample updates; and

utilizing responsive pulses from the compressing step to generate respective transversal equalizer filter coefficient.

12. A radar system for operating in an electromagnetic environment including in-band and out-of-band interferences, comprising:

means for sampling the environment to provide a spectral electromagnetic profile representative of the environment;

processor means for obtaining from the profile an optimal channel for the environment and for generating a receiver matched filter corresponding to the channel, notch filter coefficients and equalizer coefficients from responsive pulses, the optimal channel having an optimal center frequency and maximum channel bandwidth with fewest in-band interferences;

means including an antenna having an array of elements for receiving a plurality of reflected signals representing echoes of target signals transmitted by the antenna to the environment;

a plurality of filter means each for notching out the interferences in the frequency spectrum of a corresponding one of the reflection signals;

beam forming means for accepting all of the interference notched out reflection signals and for automatically combining the reflection signals to form a beam signal having pattern nulls in the direction of the interferences, the beam signal being substantially devoid of sidelobe interferences;

compressor and equalizer means for utilizing information from the receiver matched filter and the equalizer coefficients to compress the beam signal and to perform equalization to compensate for possible temporal sidelobes introduced thereto by the notch filter means;

whereby a substantially interference free signal having a desirable main lobe to sidelobe ratio is generated

13. The radar system according to claim 12, further comprising:

second filter means for receiving the main beam signal and for removing any residual interferences from the main beam signal, the second filter means further providing feedback to the beam forming means to insure the removal of the residual interferences.

14. The radar system according to claim 12, wherein the sampling means comprises an automatic channel monitor that continually examines the environment for updating the spectral electromagnetic profile representative thereof.

15. The radar system according to claim 12, wherein each of the notch filter means comprises:

a Fast Fourier Transformer for converting the reflection signal to its corresponding frequency spectrum;

a filter connected to the output of the Fast Fourier Transformer and being supplied by the processor means with data relating to the notch filter means for correlating the notch filter mean data with the corresponding frequency spectrum; and

an inverse Fast Fourier Transformer connected to the output of the filter for inverse transforming the correlated frequency spectrum to a corresponding time domain signal.

16. The radar system according to claim 12, wherein the compressor and equalizer means comprises:

a Fast Fourier Transformer for converting the beam signal from the beam forming means to its corresponding frequency spectrum;

a filter connected to the output of the Fast Fourier Transformer and being supplied by the processor means with data relating to the receiver matched filter and equalizer coefficients for correlating the data with the corresponding frequency spectrum; and

an inverse Fast Fourier Transformer connected to the output of the filter for inverse transforming the correlated frequency spectrum to a corresponding time domain signal.

17. The radar system according to claim 12, wherein each of the notch filter means comprises:

at least one IMS A100 type, programmable transversal filter integrated circuit.

18. In a radar system operating in an electromagnetic environment including in-band and out-of-band interferences, a method of maintaining signal detectability, optimizing resolution and restoring non-ambiguous performance for the system, comprising the steps of:

sampling the environment;

estimating from the sampled environment an electromagnetic profile including the interferences;

determining from the profile an optimal channel for the environment and channel transmit waveform parameters, the channel having an optimum center frequency and maximum channel bandwidth with fewest in-band interferences;

generating a receiver matched filter corresponding to the determined optimum channel, notch filter and equalizer coefficients;

transmitting a plurality of target signals based on the waveform parameters to the environment;

utilizing an array antenna to receive a plurality of reflection signals representative of echoes of the target signals, each array of the antenna receiving one of the reflection signals and any interference superposed thereon;

suppressing the interference in each of the reflection signals and converting the reflection signals into corresponding frequency spectrums;

combining the corresponding frequency spectrums to form a beam signal having pattern nulls in the direction of interferences and substantially eliminating sidelobe interferences from the beam signal;

utilizing data relating to the receiver matched filter and the equalizer coefficients to compress and to equalize the beam signal for compensating possible temporal sidelobe interference introduced thereto during the suppressing step;

thereby generating a substantially interference free signal having a desireable main lobe to sidelobe ratio.

19. The method according to claim 18, wherein the combining and eliminating step comprises the step of:

utilizing an adaptive array digital beam-former for receiving the interference suppressed reflection signals and for outputting the beam signal.

20. The method according to claim 19, further comprising the step of:

feedbacking data to the digital beam-former to ensure that no interference exists in the main beam and that the beam-former suppresses only the sidelobe interferences.
 Description Submit all comments and votes
 


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to radar systems and more particularly to a technique and apparatus for operating radar and narrow band communications-type emitters in the same frequency band such that the radar transmitter and receiver maintain good signal detectability, optimized resolution and non-ambiguous performance.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

It is well known by those versed in the art of radar pulse waveform design that radar target resolution is inversely related to radar waveform bandwidth. It is also well known that the optimum theoretical detection performance of any radar system is dependent only upon the pulse waveform energy and the receiver noise configuration. In an effort to increase waveform energy using peak power limited radar transmitters, long pulse duration, constant envelope and wide bandwidth signals are used. These efforts are covered by the general category of large time-bandwidth product or pulse compression waveforms and are disclosed by the following references: Huttman German Patent Ser. No. 768,068; Cauer German Pat. No. 892,772; Sproule, et al. British Patent Ser. No. 604,429; Dicke U.S. Pat. No. 2,624,876; and Darlington U.S. Pat. No. 2,678,997.

In general, the long duration, high energy radar pulse in the above-mentioned systems is phase (or frequency) modulated (or coded) to realize a bandwidth that is orders of magnitude greater than that predicted by its pulse width alone. And it is this phase (or frequency) modulation (or code) that must be removed by a receiver of the system when its received echoes are processed. To do so, the received long duration pulse is compressed by the receiver into a narrow, high amplitude pulse. In most existing systems, this compression is performed in a fixed analog dispersive delay line. However, in accordance with copending application Ser. No. 196,579 entitled "FM Modulation Technique for Producing Frequency Rejection Bands" by Cermignani, et al., and also copending application Ser. No. 196,578 entitled "Narrow Band Interference Suppressor for Pulse Compression Radar," by Schreiber, et al., both applications having been assigned to the same assignee as the instant invention, it may presently be performed digitally, using a real time programmable discrete Fourier transform/inverse Fourier transform device. The discrete Fourier transform of the received time waveform is taken in real time, conjugate phase weighted to cancel the phase modulation (or code), amplitude weighted to control temporal sidelobes or ambiguity, and then transformed back into the time domain.

There exists, however, electromagnetic environments under which such radar systems must operate where narrow bandwidth, high-power interference sources are active at frequencies within the same bandwidth as that of the pulse compression radar. If, as presently done, the combination of the received interference and the desired, small echo signal is processed by an analog dispersive delay line, the resulting compressed time pulse may become distorted and undetectable, due to the presence of the much larger interference.

One approach to correct this problem is to design and implement narrow, fixed bandwidth, band eliminate filters in the radar receiver, prior to pulse recompression, so that the unwanted interference frequencies are attenuated prior to passing the received echo signal through the dispersive delay line. Yet because the interference changes its center frequency and bandwidth as a function of time and radar antenna azimuth angle, the narrow band eliminate filters must track the interference. Consequently, the radar must perform a spectral analysis of the environment; that is, precisely locating the interference emitters in the radar band of operation and tuning the band eliminate filters to the undesired emitter center frequency.

In practice, however, since the narrow, fixed bandwidth, band eliminate filters would attenuate, besides the interference and noise, the signal itself, there is a significant net loss in the signal-to-noise ratio, especially if multiple narrow band cancellers are needed to remove multiple in-band interferences. As is well known in the signal processing art, this result follows directly from the fact that the resulting receiver transfer function is not the "matched filter" for the transmitted signal; hence, there is the degradation in post-detection signal-to-noise ratio caused by the mismatch filter loss.

Degradation in post-detection signal-to-noise ratio notwithstanding, the narrowed, fixed bandwidth, band eliminate filters also introduced intolerable increases in the compressed pulse temporal sidelobes. As is well known in the signal analysis art, this increase in the compressed pulse temporal sidelobes follows directly from the fact that receiver transfer function causes "paired echo" distortion of the recompressed pulse, i.e., the amplitudes of the paired echoes are proportional to the relative bandwidth of the band eliminate filters, and their locations relative to the main pulse of the signal are determined by their displacement from the center frequency of the original signal. Oftentimes this degradation of main lobe to sidelobe ratio is referred to as ambiguity, since there would appear to be many targets when in fact there is only one. Thus, present systems do not adapt the transmitted signals to avoid the interference bands but only filter the unadapted receiver signal to eliminate the interference, with resulting loss in detectability and distortion that causes loss of resolution and increases ambiguity.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is a technique and the apparatus thereof for restoring radar detectability, optimizing radar resolution and restoring non-ambiguous performance when the radar is required to operate in an electromagnetic environment that includes many simultaneous in-band and out-of-band narrow bandwidth interferences.

In particular, the present invention uses an automatic channel monitor to sample the electromagnetic environment in which the radar system is to operate. From the sampling of the environment, an electromagnetic interference (EMI) profile, which serves as a data base for calculation of the necessary bandwidth and waveforms later on, is obtained. Next, the appropriate bandwidth and the center frequency for a signal is determined. And with these pieces of information, a radar waveform is designed by means of an adaptive waveform processor, the waveform having a spectrum which contains no energy in-band with the interferences. At the same time, the processor also designs a matched filter that notches out the interferences and reduces their levels below receiver noise. The receiver is next equalized, by certain equalizer coefficients, so that when the radar pulse is received, an appropriate proper main lobe to sidelobe ratio is obtained in the compressed pulse. As a result, since there is no energy in-band with the interferences and an acceptable main lobe to sidelobe ratio is present, an optimum detection, i.e. a matched filter solution, is obtained. Thus, the present invention permits a radar system to operate in an electromagnetic environment which includes many simultaneous in-band and out-of-band narrow bandwidth interferences.

Therefore, it is an objective of the present invention to allow both radar and narrow band communications-type emitters to operate in the same frequency band.

It is another objective of the present invention to provide a radar system that has optimal resolution, non-ambiguous performance and good signal detectability.

It is yet another objective of the present invention to provide for a radar system that does not need to increase its transmitter power to restore detection range nor increase its data processing load to work around range ambiguity in target tracking.

The above-mentioned objectives and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent and the invention itself will be best understood by references to the following description of an embodiment of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram indicating the different components needed for the present invention adaptive waveform radar system;

FIG. 2 shows an EMI profile, an idealized transmitter signal spectrum for a linear FM, fixed bandwidth and center frequency radar for a nonadaptive waveform;

FIG. 3 illustrates the deficiencies of linear FM radar signals operating in the presence of interferences;

FIG. 4 illustrates the situation for an adaptive waveform operating in an EMI environment identical to that shown in FIG. 2;

FIG. 5 shows pulse compression with the adaptive waveform, both without EMI and with EMI and narrow band cancellers;

FIG. 6 is a block diagram of the real time Fast Fourier Transformer simulator used in the present invention;

FIG. 7 is a table that demonstrates the matched filter detection performance with no interference;

FIG. 8 is a table illustrating the simulation results with interference;

FIG. 9 is a table demonstrating that matched filter detection performance can nominally be achieved in an environment with interference by using the present invention technique and apparatus; and

FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating the difference between a waveform obtained as a result of the instant invention and a waveform similar to that obtained in FIG. 5, and

FIG. 11 is a block diagram illustrating a second embodiment of the invention which uses an antenna array instead of a corporate feed antenna.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENT INVENTION

It is well known that the spectrum of a pulse compression waveform is determined by its phase (or frequency) modulation (or code). It is further well known that the optimum detection of such a pulse is achieved using a matched filter, i.e., a filter having an amplitude response identical to the pulse's Fourier transform amplitude and with phase response conjugate to the pulse's Fourier transform phase.

It has also been well documented that any band limited signal may be represented by its sampled values taken at a rate greater than twice the bandwidth of the signal, i.e., the Nyquist rate. Furthermore, it has been well documented that the discrete Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of blocks of those samples is a discrete (sampled) representation in the frequency domain of the pulse's true Fourier transform and that complex multiplication of the FFT and subsequent inverse discrete Fast Fourier Transformation (IFFT) under nonrestrictive conditions constitute a linear filtering, i.e., a linear convolution.

In copending application by Schreiber, et al. entitled "Narrow Band Interference Suppressor for Pulse Compression Radar", having application Ser. No. 196,578, assigned to the same assignee as the instant invention and incorporated herein by reference, it is disclosed that the relevant information carried by any received pulse compression signal is in its phase only and that the amplitude information is irrelevant. Conventional linear FM, pulse compression radar receivers are tacit acknowledgement of this because the pulse compression dispersive delay line operates on the received radar pulse to cancel its phase. The receiver amplitude tapering is conventionally invoked to control compression pulse temporal sidelobes and is independent of pulse spectrum amplitude, usually being selected from several known tapers such as Hamming, Hanning, Tschebyscheff, Taylor, etc.

Referring to FIG. 1, there is shown a functional block diagram of the present invention adaptive waveform radar. As shown, the adaptive waveform radar system uses a conventional antenna such as rotodome antenna 2 connected to a duplexer 4. It should be appreciated that an antenna array may also be used. In fact, such will be discussed as a second embodiment of the invention, infra.

The output of duplexer 4 is connected to an automatic channel monitor 6 and a radar receiver 8. As is well known, pulses may both be received and sent by duplexer 4. Connected and providing input to duplexer 4 is a radar transmitter 10, which also has an output line 24 connected to radar receiver 8. The radar transmitter is connected to a radar pulse waveform synthesizer and is being fed thereby. An adaptive waveform processor 14, which receives its input data base from automatic channel monitor 6, provides the input for waveform synthesizer 12 via line 13. Processor 14 also provides an input to a filter 16 via line 15 which has as its input and output a Fast Fourier Transform circuit (FFT) 18 and an inverse Fourier transform circuit (IFFT) 20, respectively. For ease of discussion, FFT 18, filter 16 and IFFT 20 may be combined and refer to as a real time Fast Fourier Transformer (FFT) 22.

Automatic channel monitor 6, which is made by The General Electric Company, continually samples the electromagnetic environment in which the system is being operated to provide a spectral estimation thereof. The estimation is constantly updated to provide in real time the interference spectrum and the best channel for the radar system to operate in. The best channel would be that which has the widest bandwidth with the least number of interferences. The interference spectrum provides the emitter center frequency, the bandwidth and amplitude as a function of radar azimuth angle. From these pieces of information, and electromagnetic interference (EMI) data base for the system is formed.

The EMI profile is provided as an input to adaptive waveform processor 14, which is a special purpose computer employing a microprocessor and a memory, which are available from Motorola, INTEL, and Cypress Semiconductor Corporations. In essence, processor 14 is an algorithmically specialized computational system having a design reflecting the requirement of the specific algorithms for the system. It is programmable in the sense that it can solve the same algorithms for different initial conditions and coefficient sets. This programmability is a non-real time overhead function and is not a reconfiguration of the processor. And the algorithms that the processor must execute, in terms of Fast Fourier Transforms and inverse Fast Fourier Transforms, are well known and described, for example, by Bowen, et al. in "VLSI Systems Design for Digital Signal Processing", Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New York (1982).

For the instant invention system, adaptive waveform processor 14 analyses the EMI data base (or profile) provided by monitor 6 and determines the best available channel for each azimuth sector. In other words, the center frequency, the maximum channel bandwidth for fewest in-band interferences, the interference center frequencies and the bandwidth are all determined, in view as the best available channel, by processor 14. Thereafter, using signal design techniques well known to those versed in the art and discussed in aforenoted copending application Ser. No. 196,579 by Cermignani, et al. entitled "FM Modulation Technique for Producing Frequency Rejection Bands", incorporated herein by reference, a signal is designed to match, in the "matched filter" sense, the best available channel as defined by the interferences, as measured by monitor 6.

Processor 14 also designs the matched filter (for the waveform from radar receiver 8, to be discussed more in-depth later) by supplying equalizer coefficients to filter 16 of real time FFT 22, which comprises FFT 18, filter 16 and IFFT 20, all of which have been exhaustively discussed in the aforenoted incorporated Schreiber, et al. copending application.

The above-mentioned signal designed to match the best available channel is synthesized in synthesizer 12, which is manufactured by The Hewlett Packard Company, and fed to a conventional pulse radar transmitter 10, manufactured for example by The General Electric Company. The signal may be provided to conventional duplexer 4, before being fed to a fan-beam rotodome antenna 2, manufactured for example by The Randtron Company.

The signal designed by synthesizer 12 has no energy in-band with the EMI profile. In radar transmitter 10, the power of the signal is amplified before being radiated out at some preferred direction into the environment by means of antenna 2. And when the radiated signal impinges on a target, a reflection is obtained. And by means of control circuits well known in radar systems, the transmitter is shut down by the time the signal hits the target. Accordingly, the receiver is turned on by the duplexer and the reflection of the sent signal, i.e., the echo of the target, is received through rotodome antenna 2 and directed by duplexer 4 to radar receiver 8, which is a conventional type of radar receiver. Receiver 8 includes an analog to digital converter and simply amplifies the received echo and converts the same to a complex, digital signal, i.e., in-phase and quadrature, before providing it as a complex input to FFT 18. FFT 18 takes blocks of the echo signal and converts the same to its frequency spectrum as indicated by the brackets underneath FFT 18 in FIG. 1.

Once the return signal has been converted to its frequency domain representation, it is then multiplied by the receiver matched filter and the equalizer coefficients in filter 16, supplied thereto by processor 14. From this multiplication, the interferences on the reflection signal are suppressed. IFFT 20 next converts the frequency spectrum back into the time domain and presents the reflection radar signal, as an uncontaminated compressed pulse, for further processing via line 23. It should be appreciated that the operation performed by real time FFT 22 involves digital signal processing, as described in the aforenoted Schreiber, et al. copending application. It should further be appreciated that the signal sent via line 23 may have a very low main lobe to sidelobe ratio, as illustrated in FIG. 10.

Referring to FIG. 2, an EMI profile for a non-adaptive waveform and an idealized transmit signal spectrum for a linear FM, fixed bandwidth at center frequency radar is shown. It can be seen that within the transmit signal spectrum there are three in-band interferences The filtering provided by the receiver imposes the nominal cos.sup.4 spectral amplitude weighting for the recompressed pulse temporal sidelobe control and for the out-of-band interference suppression. Three band eliminate filters are used to suppress the in-band interferences. Thus, it should be clear to those skilled in the art of signal analysis that the receiver filter is not a matched filter for the transmit signal. Consequently, severe loss of pulse detection signal-to-noise ratio occurs.

In addition, the three spectral holes, as indicated by the waveform at the bottom portion of FIG. 2, indicates tha