|
|
|
| United States Patent | 4903201 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/4903201.html |
| Inventor(s) | Wagner; Susan W. (Dallas, TX) |
| Abstract | A computerized open outcry exchange system for transacting sales of a
particular futures commodity contract by members of a futures trading
exchange wherein bids to purchase or offers to sell the particular
commodity contract are made by the members through remote terminals and
the exchange computer automatically matches offers and bids to complete
the transaction. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
February 20, 1990 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
November 3, 1983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 3253263
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4554418 Toy 379/88.01 Nov,1985 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4412287 Braddock, III 705/37 Oct,1983 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4346442 Musmanno 705/36R Aug,1982 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4334270 Towers 705/36R Jun,1982 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4321672 Braun 705/42 Mar,1982 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4275456 Tanaka 714/18 Jun,1981 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4264782 Konheim 705/75 Apr,1981 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4032946 Wakatsuki 463/25 Jun,1977 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3976840 Cleveland 379/93.02 Aug,1976 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3974480 Gernelle 710/260 Aug,1976 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3848233 Lotan 710/305 Nov,1974 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3770941 Gechele 235/383 Nov,1973 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3753233 Cardell, Jr. 715/531 Aug,1973 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3652795 Wolf 379/91.01 Mar,1972 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3596254 Highleyman 436/93 Jul,1971 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3594503 Wolf 399/58 Jul,1971 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3581072 Nymeyer 114/279 May,1971 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3573747 Adams 359/715 Apr,1971 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4376978 Musmanno 705/36R Dec,1969 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
|
|
|
| Market Size |
|
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market
sector:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Market Share |
|
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Reasonable Royalty |
|
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
|
| | |
| |
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
|
| Market Size | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Market Share | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Reasonable Royalty | N/A | [No votes] |
| | N/A | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Technical Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
I claim:
1. A computerized open outcry exchange system for transacting sales of a
particular futures commodity contract in varying volumes or lot sizes by
members of a futures trading exchange as principals or agents for others
wherein bids to purchase or offers to sell said particular commodity
contract are made by said principals or agents through remote terminals,
said system comprising:
a. means for receiving and storing bids and offers from said remote
terminals and automatically completing a transaction of matching bids and
offers on a first-come, first-served basis thereby establishing a trading
system,
b. means for storing CFTC requirements and regulations to be observed on
said buy and sell transactions thereby establishing a clearing system,
c. means coupling said stored CFTC requirements and regulations in said
clearing system to said trading system for comparing said transaction with
said stored requirements and regulations thereby determining the validity
of each transaction,
d. means for storing predetermined compliance criteria necessary to detect
illegal trade practices or trade patterns which would adversely affect
said commodity market thereby establishing a compliance system, and
e. mean coupling said stored compliance criteria in said compliance system
to said trading system and said clearing system for automatically
comparing said transaction determined to be valid to said predetermined
compliance criteria thereby enabling detection of illegal trade practices
and trade patterns which would adversely affect said commodity market.
2. A system as in claim 1 further including:
a. means in said remote terminals for identifying by code said member, as
agent or a principal, making said bid or offer, and
b. a central processor in said trading system having means for recording
said identify code whereby said agent or principal may be identified.
3. A system as in claim 2 further including:
a. means in said central processor for storing relevant information
relating to each received bid or offer including prioritizing each
received bid or offer on the basis of price, lot size and time received by
said central processor, said
b. display means in said remote terminals coupled to said central processor
for receiving said prioritized bids and offers and displaying at least a
part of all bids in descending price order and all offers in ascending
price order.
4. A system as in claim 3 further including:
a. a movable cursor on said remote terminal display for identifying said
member's bid or offer, and
b. keyboard means in said remote terminal for modifying said member's bid
or offer identified by said movable cursor by entering data through said
keyboard modifying said selected bid or offer.
5. A system as in claim 2 further including:
a. means coupled to said recording means in said central processor for
accessing relevant information relating to at least a part of said stored
bids and offers for a particular commodity contract, and
b. means coupled to said accessing means for determining the breadth of the
market for that commodity contract by displaying the number of bids for
any particular number of offers based on said relevant information.
6. A system as in claim 2 further including:
a. means coupled to said recording means in said central processor for
accessing relevant information relating to said stored bids and offers for
a particular commodity contract, and
b. means coupled to said accessing means for displaying bid or offer lot
sizes, last sales price, daily price ranges, and volume of trades of said
commodity contracts occurring over any predetermined period of time.
7. A system as in claim 6 wherein said display means displays the
variations in lot size, last sales price, daily price ranges, and volumes
of trades of said commodity contracts that occur between various ones of
said predetermined periods of time.
8. A system as in claim 2 further including printing means at each remote
terminal coupled to said central processor for printing the execution of
each transaction initiated by a particular terminal including date, time,
lot size and price of said commodity contract.
9. A system as in claim 2 further including:
a. means in said central processor for establishing trading limits in
dollar volume for any particular remote terminal, and
b. means in said clearing system coupled to said remote terminals for
rejecting any bid or offer from said remote terminal that exceeds the
trading limits established for each of said terminals.
10. A system as in claim 2 further including:
a. means in said compliance system for accessing said storage means in said
central processor, and
b. means coupled to said accessing means for detecting patterns of trading
which may be manipulative by displaying times of receipt of said bids and
offers, the agent or principal making said trades, or the history of
trading of said agent or principal.
11. A system as in claim 2 further including:
a. a printer coupled to said central processor, and
b. means selectively coupling said central processor storage to said
printer for printing the volume of trading of any commodity contract over
any predetermined period of time.
12. A system as in claim 2 further including:
a. a portable hand-held terminal for receiving and generating buy and sell
data for features commodity contracts,
b. a modem coupled to said portable hand-held terminal for converting said
generated data to information capable of being transmitted to said trading
system and converting said received data to information capable of being
used by said portable terminal, and
c. telephone lines coupling said modem converted information to and from
said trading system.
13. A system as in claim 12 wherein said portable hand-held terminal
further comprises:
a. a display,
b. a keyboard containing commodity keys, buy and sell keys, numerical entry
keys and control keys,
c. means for generating said member identification code uniquely
identifying a particular hand-held terminal, and
d. means for storing said transaction in said member remote terminal and
only displaying said transaction at said portable terminal.
14. An automated system for transacting a sale of a particular futures
commodity contract in predetermined volumes or lot sizes by members of the
trading system as principals or agents for others wherein bids to purchase
or offers to sell are made by said principals or agents for said
particular commodity contract, said system comprising:
a. remote terminals for initiating and transmitting transaction data
including buyer's bids and seller's offers,
b. a central processor for receiving said buyer's bids and seller's offers
thereby forming a trading system,
c. means in said central processor for completing a transaction by
comparing received bids with received offers to find a matching bid and
offer,
d. means coupled to said trading system and said remote terminals for
storing predetermined trading constraints and approving only those bids
and offers coming within said constraints thereby forming a clearing
system,
e. means coupled to said trading system and said clearing system for
storing predetermined criteria representing fraudulent trading practices
and comparing said transaction data with said predetermined criteria
thereby establishing a compliance system for enabling detection of said
fraudulent trading practices, and
f. means in said central processor for notifying the remote terminals of a
completed transaction when a matched bid and offer are found.
15. A system as in claim 14 further including:
a. a storage means in said central processor and
b. means coupled to said storage means for storing said received bids and
offers according to time, price and lot size for a particular commodity
contract.
16. A system as in claim 15 further including:
a. means in said central processor for matching said bids and offers on a
priority basis where first received bids and first received offers are
matched, and
b. means coupled to said matching means for completing said transaction of
said matched bids and offers on a first received in time basis.
17. A system as in claim 14 wherein said received bids and offers are
stored in respective memory queues according to commodity contract by
time, lot size, and price.
18. A system as in claim 17 further including means in said central
processor for reporting to said remote terminals last sales of a commodity
contract by time, lot size, and price.
19. A system as in claim 17 further including means in said central
processor for reporting to said remote terminals bids and offers by type
of commodity contract as received by time, quantity, and price.
20. A system as in claim 17 further including means in said central
processor for notifying remote terminals of filled and unfilled orders.
21. A system as in claim 17 further including memory means in said central
processor for maintaining a complete trading history of each trading
system member.
22. A system as in claim 14 further including:
a. means for identifying each exchange member by an electronic code,
b. means in said clearing system for storing limits of trade for each
member, and
c. means in said central processor coupled to said trade limit storing
means and said exchange identifying means for rejecting any proposed trade
from a member that exceeds the established position limits.
23. A method of transacting a sale of a particular futures commodity in
varying volumes or lot sizes by members of a futures trading exchange as
principals or agents for others wherein bids to purchase or offers to sell
are made by said principals or agents for said particular commodity, said
method comprising the steps of:
a. receiving in a central processor buyer bids and seller offers on a
particular commodity from remote terminals,
b. storing in said central processor said bids and offers in the form of
time, price and lot size of each of said received bids and offers,
c. comparing said received bids and offers and matching equal bids and
offers on a first cone, first served basis according to the time of
receiving said bids and offers thereby storing a trading system,
d. storing buy and sell constraints on each member of said exchange thereby
forming a clearing system,
e. coupling said clearing system to said trading system for approving
execution of a transaction only when said transaction falls within said
predetermined buy and sell constraints,
f. executing the buy and sell transaction for a particular commodity for
which said offer and bid have been matched and approved by said clearing
system,
g. storing predetermined compliance criteria necessary to detect illegal
trade practices thereby forming a compliance system,
h. coupling said compliance system to said trading system and said clearing
system for detecting any illegal trade practices as indicated by said
stored predetermined criteria, and
i. confirming the execution of an approved transaction immediately to both
buyer and seller at the remote terminals whose bid and offer are matched.
24. A method as in claim 23 further comprising the steps of:
a. identifying by code at said remote terminals whether an agent or a
principal has made said bid or offer, and
b. recording said identity code in said central processor whereby said
agent or principal may be identified.
25. A method as in claim 24 further comprising the steps of:
a. prioritizing each received bid or offer on the basis of price, lot size
and time received by said central processor, and
b. receiving said prioritized bids and offers and displaying all bids in
descending price order and all offers in ascending price order.
26. A method as in claim 25 further comprising the steps of:
a. providing a keyboard and a movable cursor on said remote terminal
display,
b. modifying a bid or offer by moving said cursor to said displayed bid or
offer, and
c. entering modifying data through said keyboard.
27. A method as in claim 24 further including the step of printing the
execution of each transaction initiated by a particular remote terminal
coupled to said central processor including date, time, lot size and price
of said transaction and the name of the other member completing said
transaction.
28. A system as in claim 24 wherein said step of detecting illegal trade
practices comprises:
a. accessing said storage means in said central processor, and
b. displaying times of receipt of said bids and offers, the agent or
principal making said trades, and the history of trading cf said agent or
principal whereby illegal trade practices are made manifest.
29. A method as in claim 23 further comprising the steps of:
a. accessing said stored bids and offers for a particular commodity, and
b. determining the breadth of the market for that commodity by displaying
the number of bids for any particular number of offers.
30. A method as in claim 23 further comprising the steps of:
a. accessing said stored bids and offers for a particular futures
commodity, and
b. displaying bid or offer lot sizes, last sales price, daily price ranges,
and volume of trades of said futures commodity occurring over any
predetermined period of time.
31. A method as in claim 30 further including the step of displaying the
variations in lot size, last sales price, daily price ranges, and volumes
of trades of said commodity that occur between various ones of said
predetermined periods of time.
32. A method as in claim 23 further comprising the steps of:
a. storing in at said central processor trading limits in dollar volume for
any particular remote terminal, and
b. rejecting any bid or offer from any said remote terminal that exceeds
the stored trading limits for each of said terminals.
33. A method as in claim 24 further comprising the steps of:
a. coupling a printer to said central processor, and
b. selectively coupling said central processor storage to said printer for
printing the volume of trading of any commodity over any particular period
of time.
34. A method of storing an automated futures trading system for transacting
a sale of a particular commodity in predetermined volumes or lot sizes by
members of the trading system as principals or agents for others wherein
bids to purchase or offers to sell said particular commodity are made by
said principals or agents, said method comprising the steps of:
a. initiating and transmitting buyer's bids and seller's offers from
remotely terminals,
b. determining whether said buyer's bids and seller's offers are valid,
c. comparing received valid bids with received valid offers to find a
matching bid and offer on a first-come, first-served basis,
d. reviewing said valid bids and offers to detect illegal trading
practices, and
e. notifying the remote terminals of a completed transaction when a matched
bid and offer are found.
35. A method as in claim 34 further comprising the steps of:
a. forming a storage means in said central processor, and
b. storing said received bids and offers according to time, price and lot
size for a particular commodity in said storage means.
36. A method as in claim 35 further comprising the steps of:
a. matching said bids and offers stored in said central processor on a
priority basis where first received bids and first received offers are
matched, and
b. completing said transaction of said matched bids and offers on a first
received in time basis.
37. A method as in claim 34 further including the step of storing said
received bids and offers in respective memory queues according to time,
lot size, price and commodity.
38. A method as in claim 37 further comprising the step of reporting to
said remote terminals last sales by time, lot size, price and commodity.
39. A method as in claim 37 further comprising the step of reporting to
said remote terminals bids and offers as received by time, lot size, price
and commodity.
40. A method as in claim 37 further comprising the step of notifying remote
terminals of filled and unfilled orders.
41. A method as in claim 37 further comprising the step of maintaining a
complete trading history of each trading system member.
42. A system as in claim 34 further comprising the steps of:
a. identifying each exchange member by an electronic code,
b. establishing limits of trade for each member, and
c. rejecting any proposed trade from a member that exceeds the established
position limits. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a futures trading exchange and in
particular to an automated open outcry futures trading exchange having a
central processor associated with one or more remote terminals through
which trades can be made by members of the exchange who enter offers or
bids at the remote terminal and couple them to a central processor which
compares any bid with offers on a priority basis, finds a match and
completes the execution of the transaction.
The major purpose of the futures marketplace is to provide a facility
whereby large numbers of people can make bids and offers through a central
location on a commodity contract in order to determine its market value. A
second purpose of the futures market is to spread the risk of price
changes in a business from a small group of people to a larger group of
people. This process is known as risk management. The reason the risk can
be spread is that speculators, in addition to hedgers, enter the market
and provide liquidity when they recognize an economic benefit from changes
in the prices of commodity contracts. The larger number of participants
allows a hedger to identify a price level which takes into account his
cost of doing business and his desired profit level and then to lock-in a
price level by offsetting losses in the cash market with equal gains in
the futures market. All of this must be done in such a way as to minimize
fraud and manipulation of the marketplace and is conducted with the
oversight of and under the direction of the federal government which
establishes the required rules and regulations.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The method or process of trading futures contracts has remained virtually
the same since the markets first opened in the 1800's. Use of state of the
art technology in present systems has been limited thus resulting in major
inefficiencies and opportunities for abuse. The futures trading system and
markets, as they exist today, are the remnants of an archaic system. When
an investor (hedger or speculator) wishes to trade on any of the futures
exchanges, he is many times removed from access to firsthand trade data
unless he is a floor trader. He must first call his broker who may have a
direct line to a floor clerk but, generally, must call the trading room of
the broker headquarters. The trading room calls the floor clerk who in
turn relays the information to a runner. The runner relays the request for
information or execution of a trade to the floor trader. The floor trader
stands in a "pit" and executes a trade by shouting out his offer to sell,
or buy, until someone across the pit signals that they will take the
offered price (bid). When a trader thinks he has made a trade, he marks a
trading card and a portion of the card is given to the exchange to begin
the clearing process or accounting and funds collection process. This is
known as the "open outcry" system because trading takes place in a central
location in open view of a variety of participants. Most exchanges require
that the trader enter the trade within one-half hour of the time a trade
has been executed.
As can be imagined, there are many problems with the present archaic
system. The markets were originally designed when there were a relatively
few number of people who wished to participate in the process. As the
number of participants have increased, it has meant that those who are
directly on the floor of an exchange are at a distinct advantage over
those who are not physically present. First, when a customer asks a
question as to what is taking place, the question is relayed through four
or five people. An answer to a question is at most subjective because it
is based on the observation of those who are on the floor. The floor
trader will tell what he thinks is happening but he does not have the
tools to be sure that his observation is correct. The advantage that a
floor trader has is that if his observation is not correct, he can make an
additional trade to correct the situation for himself. But a retail broker
or customer may not be advised of a change and at worst may simply be
given inaccurate information.
The opportunity for mistake or abuse has been acknowledged by regulators
and exchanges alike. As the system presently exists, trades are not
confirmed until after an exchange is closed for the day. Therefore, if a
floor trader has traded in front of a customer in order to obtain a better
price or has failed to execute a trade for fraudulent reasons, it is
difficult to detect. Even when a trade has been properly executed the
opportunity for abuse or mistakes is still high as will be discussed
hereinafter.
On a traditional exchange, after a trade is made a card is handed to an
exchange employee who then keypunches the data into the computer. At the
same time trading cards must be manually sorted to match trades. At the
end of the day the computer lists are checked against the trading cards to
reach agreement as to the trades which have been made. As can be well
understood, there, first, may have been a mistake in the keypunching
process. Secondly, there may be a difference given in the two cards as to
the price at which a trade was made and thirdly because the trades are
based on eye contact, there may be a difference in opinion as to whether a
trade was actually made at all. When there is disagreement, a list of "out
trades" is made and agreement must be reached as to whether the trade was
made at all and if so at what price. The nature of the discrepancy
determines whether the trader, the broker, or the customer must bear the
cost of an out trade. Again, because the customer is at a lengthy
distance, he is at a disadvantage because he takes no part in the
resolution process.
The accounting process also has its problems. Once the matching of trades
takes place, the information is fed into the clearing process of an
exchange. The present clearing process in most exchanges is a computerized
process. However, since information is manually entered, after the fact of
the trade, its value lies only in the accounting process and not in the
control of the exchange process. The exchange only knows at the end of the
day if a trader has exceeded his position limits or has incorrectly
identified a clearing member or has provided other incorrect information.
On most exchanges 300 to 400 individuals are required to process trading
cards and complete the clearing function.
The surveillance of the system as it now exists (to insure proper operation
and minimize mistakes and abuse) also has numerous problems. Surveillance
is completed on existing exchanges through live observation. An exchange
employee stands in the middle of a ring and observes trading as it takes
place. With close to a 1,000 people on the floor of an exchange,
observation is spotty at best. Some exchanges have programs for detecting
illegal trade practices which are repetitive but even when such practices
are detected often the information available as evidence is inaccurate and
unreliable.
The present invention, the automated futures trade exchange, has created an
entire automated process for trading futures contracts which provides
accurate and precise information, trading based on factual data, assurance
of execution and immediate confirmation of the contracts, control through
real time processing of information and electronic surveillance, and the
use of computer hardware to implement the process. It does not separate
clearing and surveillance from the futures trading process as do other
exchanges because it is the combined process which allows the markets to
function properly.
All trading conducted on the automated futures trading system will be
effected through a central computer complex programmed to handle orders
for the exchange's futures contracts. Access to this central computer will
be available only through specially programmed remote computer terminals
which will be distributed only to exchange members who will have a coded
membership number. Each remote terminal will consist of a keyboard, a
printer, on-line storage and a video monitor, the latter displaying a
variety of information regarding the futures contracts traded on the
exchange. Members will be able to utilize these terminals to transmit to
the central computer bids and offers for their own accounts as principals
or for the accounts of customers for whom they are agents. However, the
system does not allow direct negotiations between members of the exchange
as in the system disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,573,747. Instead, the system
acts as an intermediary among members and matches bids and offers and
completes the transaction. Thus, the present novel system is an open
outcry system since trading takes place in a central location in open view
of a variety of participants.
When an order is transmitted to the central computer, its pertinent
characteristics will be recorded including quantity, price, the time that
the order was placed, and the capacity in which the order is entered; that
is, whether as agent or principal. The exchange central computer will
retain all orders received, arranging each bid and offer on the basis of
its price, quantity and entry time and displaying all bids in descending
order of price and all offers in ascending order of price. Thus, each bid
or offer will become part of the market data displayed in every member's
remote terminal video monitor. The breadth of the market will also be
indicated. That is, whether a bid of 200 contracts represents one offer to
buy 200 contracts or 20 offers to buy 10 contracts.
In addition, the video monitor of each remote terminal will display lot
sizes, last sale prices, daily price ranges, the volume for each contract
month, the spread relationships or price differential among the various
contract months, and allows simultaneous spread trades (both in time and
by commodity) to take place.
Pertinent to this process is the capability to modify prices at a remote
terminal by moving a cursor on the video display to the bid or offer
desired to be modified by the user which modification is then accomplished
through the keyboard. The capability to see the display of buys and sells
is analogous to the open outcry system of trading and is pertinent to good
trading because it shows the supply and demand in the market. On the floor
of an existing exchange, a trader would have a "feel" for the market but
would not be able to relay to a customer with any degree of accuracy
information pertaining to the distribution of bids and offers.
The exchange central computer will automatically match equal bids and
offers on a first come, first served basis thereby executing the
transaction. Each transaction execution will be immediately confirmed to
the members on both sides of the trade by the printing mechanisms of those
members terminals. Each execution report will include information
regarding the date, time, quantity and price of the transaction. The
exchange central computer will be able to handle a full array of futures
orders including straddles, limit orders and stop orders. Because bids and
offers are transmitted from the remote terminals directly into the
computer there will be no chance for an "out trade", that case where a
trade is made but the bid and offer do not match. Moreover, because
trading will be effected solely by the computer, a record will exist of
the precise time each order was entered, the precise time it was executed
and the precise time an execution report was transmitted.
Another important factor in trading is the capability to determine the
liquidity of the market. Again, on the floor of an exchange a trader may
note that trading is active but by the time information is relayed back
and forth between the principal and the trader the price may have moved
considerably or the bids and offers may no longer be present. No presently
existing exchange can determine with accuracy during the trading the
volume of trading immediately taking place. The present system will record
trades exactly as they are made, when they are made, and thus a member
would be able to determine the volume of trading taking place at any
particular time and would have the information necessary to determine
whether it is likely that he can come in and out of the market at his
desired price level.
Each terminal on the system will be specifically designated to trade a
certain number of contracts. Position limits for each principal are thus
determined by the fiduciary capabilities of the participant. Under the
present system of trading on exchanges, a member may execute trades far in
excess of his limit without detection by the exchange. In the present
trading system, limits will be programmed into each individual terminal
thus further eliminating the possibility of "out trades" because an
individual trader has exceeded his limits. During trading times live
surveillance of the market will take place through control terminals at
the exchange. Information may be fed directly into the surveillance system
to detect the patterns of trading which may be manipulative and since all
information is recorded as trading takes place, accuracy is assured.
All information from the trading system will be moved directly to the
clearing system. Thus, there is no manual matching of trades and accuracy
of the data is assured. Earlier and more rapid transfer of funds will be
possible thus increasing the financial viability of the exchange as a
whole.
It has been recognized for some time in the futures industry that multiple
factors determine the pricing of commodities. Thus, the use of
computerized analysis has rapidly developed and multiple tools for
graphing and receiving information has been developed. But the process for
trading and processing trades remains archaic. The present system provides
a means of executing trades, validating the information, and notifying
parties of pertinent changes without bias to those who participate. Thus,
a larger more efficient marketplace may be accommodated at lower cost.
SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
The present invention relates to a computerized open outcry trading
exchange system for transacting sales of futures commodity contracts in
varying volumes or lot sizes by members of the trading system as
principals or agents for others wherein bids to purchase or offers to sell
a particular commodity are made by said principals or agents through
remote terminals, said system comprising a trading system for receiving
buyer bids and seller offers on a particular commodity contract from said
remote terminals and automatically completing a transaction of matching
bids and offers, a clearing system for establishing requirements and
regulations to be observed on said buy and sell transactions, means
coupling said clearing system to said trading system for determining the
validity of each transaction by comparing said transaction to said
requirements and regulations, a compliance system for establishing
predetermined criteria necessary to detect illegal trade practices or
| | |