|
|
|
| United States Patent | 4959217 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/4959217.html |
| Inventor(s) | Sanders; Lynda M. (Palo Alto, CA);
Domb; Abraham (Brookline, MA) |
| Abstract | This invention concerns novel, delayed/sustained release devices and
compositions, including methods of their manufacture and use. The
compositions include macromolecules, particularly polypeptide
pharmaceuticals, and an initially partially-hydrated, non-biodegradable,
hydrogel rate-limiting membrane. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing from US Patent 4959217 |
|
|
Delayed/sustained release of macromolecules |
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
September 25, 1990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 3416530
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3551556
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3832252
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4668506 Bawa 424/429 May,1987 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4548990 Mueller 525/123 Oct,1985 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4475916 Himmelstein 424/424 Oct,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4452775 Kent 424/425 Jun,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4309996 Theeuwes 604/892.1 Jan,1982 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4298002 Ronel 424/424 Nov,1981 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4190642 Gale 424/427 Feb,1980 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4127127 Wong 424/424 Nov,1978 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4024121 Schally 530/313 May,1977 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4010125 Schally 525/54.11 Mar,1977 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3948254 Zaffaroni 128/833 Apr,1976 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3946106 Chien 424/425 Mar,1976 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3903880 Higuchi 128/833 Sep,1975 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3854480 Zaffaroni 424/424 Dec,1974 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3828777 Ness 424/427 Aug,1974 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3710795 Higuchi 424/424 Jan,1973 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3618604 Ness 430/372 Nov,1971 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4391797 Folkman 424/425 Dec,1969 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4402695 Wong 424/432 Dec,1969 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4432964 Shell 424/427 Dec,1969 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4052505 Higuchi 424/427 Dec,1969 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4069307 Higuchi 424/432 Dec,1969 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3993072 Zaffaroni 424/430 Dec,1969 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4613330 Michelson 424/424 Dec,1969 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4667014 Nestor, Jr. 530/313 Dec,1969 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4014335 Arnold 424/427 Dec,1969 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
|
|
|
| Market Size |
|
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market
sector:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Market Share |
|
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Reasonable Royalty |
|
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
|
| | |
| |
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
|
| Market Size | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Market Share | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Reasonable Royalty | N/A | [No votes] |
| | N/A | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Technical Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed is:
1. A drug delivery device for the controlled administration of a
macromolecular drug, said device comprising:
(a) a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier;
(b) a macromolecular drug having a molecular weight greater than about
1,000 mixed with said carrier; and
(c) an initially partially-hydrated, non-biodegradable, hydrogel
rate-limiting membrane, wherein said membrane:
(i) comprises a homopolymer or a copolymer material surrounding said
carrier and drug, and
(ii) has an initial water content such that it is substantially
non-permeable to said macromolecular drug.
2. The drug delivery device of claim 1 wherein said carrier is saturated
with said drug and wherein an excess of said drug in a solid state is
disposed in contact with said drug-saturated carrier.
3. The drug delivery device of claim 1 wherein said membrane is initially
hydrated to such an extent that it is structurally manipulable.
4. The drug delivery device of claim 1 wherein said membrane comprises a
crosslinked HEMA homopolymer.
5. The drug delivery device of claim 1, which is a monolithic reservoir.
6. The drug delivery device of claim 1 wherein said carrier is silicone
oil.
7. A device for the delayed/sustained release of a compound, said device
comprising:
(a) a macromolecular compound having a molecular weight greater than about
1,000;
(b) a carrier having said macromolecular compound mixed therewith; and
(c) an initially partially-hydrated, non-biodegradable, hydrogel
rate-limiting membrane, wherein said membrane:
(i) comprises a homopolymer or a copolymer material surrounding said
carrier and macromolecular compound,
(ii) is substantially non-permeable to said macromolecular compound when in
said initially partially-hydrated state, and
(iii) is hydratable, when placed in a delivery environment, to become
permeable to said macromolecular compound.
8. The drug delivery device of claim 1 useful as an ocular insert.
9. The drug delivery device of claim 1 wherein said membrane is selected
from the group of crosslinked and non-crosslinked homopolymers or
copolymers consisting of: HEMA, GMA, HEMA/GMA, HEMA/MMA, GMA/MMA, and
HEMA/GMA/MMA.
10. The drug delivery device of claim 9, which is a reservoir, wherein said
carrier is silicone oil.
11. The drug delivery device of claim 9 useful as an ocular insert.
12. The drug delivery device of claim 1 wherein said macromolecular drug
comprises a hydrophilic polypeptide.
13. The drug delivery device of claim 1 wherein said macromolecular drug
comprises a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog or a
pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
14. The drug delivery device of claim 13 wherein said carrier is saturated
with said drug and wherein an excess of said drug in a solid state is
disposed in contact with said drug-saturated carrier.
15. The drug delivery device of claim 13 wherein said analog is a
luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist or a pharmaceutically
acceptable salt thereof.
16. The drug delivery device of claim 13 wherein said analog is a
luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonist or a pharmaceutically
acceptable salt thereof.
17. The drug delivery device of claim 13 wherein said analog is nafarelin
acetate.
18. The drug delivery device of claim 17 wherein said membrane is initially
hydrated to a water content of less than about 30%.
19. The drug delivery device of claim 17 wherein said membrane is
hydratable to an equilibrium water content of about 35%-45%.
20. The drug delivery device of claim 17 wherein said membrane is
hydratable to an equilibrium water content of about 39%.
21. The drug delivery device of claim 13 wherein said analog is
aza-Gly.sup.10 nafarelin acetate.
22. The drug delivery device of claim 1 wherein said membrane is hydratable
to an equilibrium water content such that it limits the diffusion of said
macromolecular drug from said carrier to a delivery environment.
23. The drug delivery device of claim 1 wherein said macromolecular drug is
selected from the group consisting of: hormonally active polypeptides,
mammalian growth hormones, mammalian growth hormone-releasing hormones,
and polypeptides having thymosin activity.
24. A pharmaceutical formulation for controlled release of a luteinizing
hormone-releasing hormone analog, said formulation comprising:
(a) a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier;
(b) an effective amount of at least one luteinizing hormone-releasing
hormone analog or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof disposed in
contact with said carrier; and
(c) an initially partially-hydrated, non-biodegradable, hydrogel
rate-limiting membrane surrounding said carrier, said membrane being:
(i) initially hydrated to a water content of about 5% to less than about
30% by weight before placement in a delivery environment, and
(ii) hydratable to an equilibrium water content of about 30% to about 80%
by weight when in a delivery environment.
25. The formulation of claim 24 wherein said analog is a luteinizing
hormone-releasing hormone agonist.
26. The formulation of claim 24 wherein said analog is a luteinizing
hormone-releasing hormone antagonist.
27. The formulation of claim 24 wherein said analog is nafarelin acetate.
28. The formulation of claim 25 wherein said analog is a nonapeptide or a
decapeptide having the formula:
(pyro)Glu-His-V-Ser-W-X-Y-Arg-Pro-Z
or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, wherein:
V is tryptophyl, phenylalanyl or 3-(1-naphthyl)-L-alanyl;
W is tyrosyl, phenylalanyl or 3-(1-pentafluorophenyl)-L-alanyl;
X is a D-amino acid residue having the formula:
##STR5##
wherein R is: (a) a carbocyclic aryl-containing radical selected from the
group consisting of naphthyl, anthryl, fluorenyl, phenylanthryl,
biphenylyl, benzhydryl and phenyl substituted with three or more straight
chain lower alkyl groups; or
(b) a saturated carbocyclic radical selected from the group consisting of
cyclohexyl substituted with three or more straight chain lower alkyl
groups, perhydronaphthyl, perhydrobiphenylyl, perhydro-2,2-diphenylmethyl
and adamantyl;
Y is leucyl, isoluecyl, nor-leucyl or N-methyl-leucyl; and
Z is glycinamide or --NH--R.sub.1,
wherein R.sub.1 is lower alkyl, cycloalkyl, fluoro lower alkyl or has the
formula:
##STR6##
wherein R.sub.2 is hydrogen or lower alkyl.
29. The formulation of claim 28 wherein:
V is tryptophyl or phenylalanyl;
W is tyrosyl;
X is 3-(2-naphthyl)-D-alanyl or 3-(2,3,6-trimethylphenyl)-D-alanyl;
I is leucyl or N-methyl-leucyl; and
Z is glycinamide, NHEt or has the formula:
##STR7##
30. The formulation of claim 24 wherein said luteinizing hormone-releasing
hormone analog is
(pyro)Glu-His-Trp-Ser-Tyr-3-(naphthyl)-D-alanyl-Leu-Arg-Pro-Gly-NH.sub.2
or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
31. The formulation of claim 30 comprising an ocular insert containing 2.0
mg of said luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog suspended in 0.2
ml of a silicone oil carrier, wherein said membrane is a 0.5%
EGDMA-crosslinked HEMA homopolymer having an initial water content less
than or equal to 29%.
32. The formulation of claim 24 wherein said luteinizing hormone-releasing
hormone analog is
(pyro)Glu-His-Trp-Ser-Tyr-3-(naphthyl)-D-alanyl-Leu-Arg-Pro-aza-Gly-NH.sub
.2 or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
33. The formulation of claim 32 comprising a reservoir device containing
30.0 mg of said luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog suspended in
0.3 ml of a silicone oil carrier, wherein said membrane is a 0.5%
EGDMA-crosslinked HEMA homopolymer having an initial water content less
than or equal to 29%.
34. The formulation of claim 24, wherein the luteinizing hormone-releasing
hormone is an analog of natural luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, in
which the 6-position residue is changed from Gly to a D-amino acid.
35. A formulation according to claim 34, wherein the D-amino acid is D-Ala,
D-Lue, D-Phe or D-Trp.
36. A formulation according to claim 34, wherein the D amino acid is D-Leu.
37. A formulation according to claim 34, wherein the D amino acid is D-Trp.
38. The formulation according to claim 24, wherein said carrier is selected
from the group:
(a) aqueous systems;
(b) solvents;
(c) solid substrates;
(d) unpolymerized monomers or comonomers;
(e) xerogels;
(f) partially hydrated hydrogels; and
(g) fully hydrated hydrogels.
39. The formulation according to claim 38, wherein said carrier is silicone
oil.
40. A drug delivery device for the controlled administration of a
macromolecular drug, said device comprising:
(a) a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier;
(b) a macromolecular drug having a molecular weight greater than about
1,000 disposed in contact with said carrier; and
(c) an initially partially-hydrated, non-biodegradable, hydrogel
rate-limiting membrane, wherein said membrane:
(i) comprises a homopolymer or a copolymer material surrounding said
carrier, and
(ii) has an initial water content such that it is structurally manipulable.
41. The drug delivery device of claim 40 wherein said macromolecular drug
is selected from the group consisting of: hormonally active polypeptides,
mammalian growth hormones, mammalian growth hormone-releasing hormones,
and polypeptides having thymosin activity.
42. The formulation of claim 24 wherein said hydrogel comprises a copolymer
of:
(a) 50-100 mole % HEMA;
(b) 0-50 mole % MMA;
(c) 0-10 mole % crosslinking agent; and
(d) 0.01-5 mole % polymerization initiator.
43. The formulation of claim 24 wherein said hydrogel comprises a copolymer
of:
(a) 75-100 mole % HEMA;
(b) 0-25 mole % MMA;
(c) 0-5 mole % crosslinking agent; and
(d) 0.01-2 mole % polymerization initiator.
44. The formulation of claim 24 wherein said membrane is selected from the
group of crosslinked and non-crosslinked homopolymers or copolymers
consisting of: HEMA, GMA, HEMA/GMA, HEMA/MMA, GMA/MMA, and HEMA/GMA/MMA.
45. The formulation according to claim 24, wherein said membrane comprises
a 0.32% EGDMA-crosslinked homopolymer of HEMA.
46. The formulation according to claim 24, which is a reservoir device.
47. The formulation according to claim 24 useful as an ocular insert.
48. The device of claim 7 wherein said membrane is hydratable to an
equilibrium water content at which it limits the diffusion of said
macromolecular compound from said carrier to a delivery environment. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to the controlled release of macromolecules,
particularly hydrophilic macromolecules. More specifically, it relates to
the delayed/sustained release of pharmaceutical compositions, particularly
polypeptides such as luteinizing hormone-releasing hormones ("LH-RH"),
mammalian growth hormones, mammalian growth hormone-releasing hormones,
polypeptides having thymosin-like activity, and the analogs thereof.
Specifically, the invention relates to drug delivery devices having an
initially partially-hydrated, non-biodegradable hydrogel rate-limiting
membrane. These delivery systems, which may include ocular inserts and
implantable devices, delay the release of macromolecules until after
placement in a delivery environment, and then facilitate a sustained,
preferably zero-order release thereof.
2. Background Information
The sustained release of active agents is known to be of value.
Particularly in the administration of certain pharmaceuticals, long-term
drug delivery has been shown to be most effective in that constant serum
levels are obtained and patient compliance is improved. Delaying the
release of such agents is also desirable in that an immediate release upon
placement in the delivery environment can result in unacceptably high
initial concentrations of a drug at the situs of implantation or use.
The examination of synthetic hydrogels for potential biomedical
applications (including potential use in certain drug delivery devices)
has given rise to various theories regarding mechanisms of diffusion. Lee,
Jhon and Andrade have proposed that there are three classes of water in
hydrogels, using polyHEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) as their model
[Nature of Water in Synthetic Hydrogels, J. Colloid & Interface Sci., 51
(2): 225-231 (1975)]. The first 20% of hydrogel water content, called "Z
water", was said to be bound to the polymer matrix. The next 10-12% of
water content, called interfacial or "Y water", is partially affected by
the polymer matrix. Any additional water imbibed by the gel is relatively
unaffected by the polymer matrix; it is called bulk or "X water".
The Lee, et al. model was expanded upon by Kim, Cardinal, Wisniewski and
Zentner [Solute Permeation Through Hydrogel Membranes: Hydrophilic vs.
Hydrophobic Solutes, ACS Symposium Series (Water in Polymers), 127 (20):
347-359 (1980)]. They concluded that the diffusion coefficients for
hydrophilic solutes through hydrogel membranes depends on molecular size
and water content; permeation in pure polyHEMA and in polyHEMA crosslinked
with a low mole percent of ethyleneglycoldimethacrylate ("EGDMA") was via
the pore mechanism, i.e., through the bulk-type water. Hydrophobic solutes
were said to diffuse via both pore and partition mechanisms, i.e.,
respectively through the bulk-type water, and through the interfacial-type
and bound-type water. Neither article, however, included any suggestion as
to how such diffusion characteristics might be applied to the design of a
delayed/sustained delivery device.
Wood, Attwood and Collett have described a model for diffusion of the small
hydrophobic molecule salicylic acid (the solute) in hydrogels [The
influence of gel formulation on the diffusion of salicylic acid in
polyHEMA hydrogels, J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 34: 1-4 (1982)]. Radioactively
labelled salicylic acid was added to a HEMA monomer solution and
polymerized in situ. The water contents of the resulting gels were
measured. Diffusion was measured by quantifying migration of the solute to
a gel placed in contact with the sample gels. It was concluded that
diffusion occurred primarily through the polymer's pores via the hydrating
liquid at higher levels of hydration (more than 31%). At hydration levels
below 31%, diffusion was said to occur by dissolution of the solute within
the polymer segments; crosslinker concentration did not have any
significant effect on diffusion. This was correlated to a change in pore
size proportional with percent hydration. Wood, et al. did not, however,
offer any teaching as to the effects of percent hydration on
delayed/sustained release of hydrophilic macromolecular compositions. For
another treatment of the interaction of pore size and diffusion, see
Wisniewski and Kim [J. Membrane Sci., 6: 299-308 (1980)].
Controlled and sustained release compositions are known in the art for
progesterone. [See Mack, et al., Topics in Pharm. Sci., pp. 265-275
(1983). ] A variety of devices have been described, for example, in the
article by Cardinal, Kim, Song, Lee and Kim [Controlled Release Drug
Delivery Systems from Hydrogels: Progesterone Release from Monolithic,
Reservoir, Combined Reservoir-Monolithic and Monolithic Devices with Rate
Controlling Barriers, AIChE Symposium Series, 77: 52-61 (1981)].
Microporous membranes (some including hydrogels) have been used as
rate-limiting barriers for such devices, including implants, ocular
inserts, coated intrauterine devices and the like, e.g., as described in
U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,416,530 (to Ness--entitled "Eyeball Medication Dispensing
Tablet"); 3,551,556 (to Kliment, et al.--entitled "Carriers for
Biologically Active Substances"); 3,618,604 (to Ness--entitled "Ocular
Insert"); 3,828,777 (to Ness--entitled "Microporous Ocular Device"); and
4,548,990 (to Mueller, et al.--entitled "Crosslinked, Porous Polymers for
Controlled Drug Delivery").
In U.S. Pat. No. 3,993,072 (to Zaffaroni--entitled "Microporous Drug
Delivery Device") and in its parent patents 3,948,254 (entitled "Novel
Drug Delivery Device") and 3,854,380 (entitled "Drug-Delivery System"),
drug delivery systems are disclosed including a solid inner matrix
containing a drug and surrounded by a wall formed of a polymeric membrane
(the '072 and '254 patents call for a microporous membrane, the pores of
which contain a drug-release-rate-controlling medium).
Some sustained release devices have been described for the delivery of
hydrophilic macromolecules, such as polypeptides. For example, European
Patent Application Publication No. 0,092,918 (to Churchill, et
al.--entitled "Continuous Release Formulations") describes the continuous
release of, e.g., luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, growth hormones
and growth hormone releasing factor, from a hydrophobic/hydrophilic
non-crosslinked copolymer in which the hydrophobic component is
biodegradable and the hydrophilic component may or may not be
biodegradable. The composition is described as being capable of absorbing
water to form a hydrogel when placed in an aqueous, physiological-type
environment.
These prior devices depend on the relationship between the drug's
diffusivity in the reservoir, its diffusivity in the delivery environment,
and its diffusivity through the membrane. In other words, the diffusivity
through the membrane has to be the least of the three, in order for the
membrane to serve as a rate-limiting barrier. They all generally rely on
Fick's First Law of Diffusion, in which the flux of a solute through a
membrane is related to the area and thickness of the membrane, the
permeability coefficient of the solute for that membrane material, and the
concentration of the solute.
In attempts to apply the prior art relating to hydrogel-based delivery
devices to macromolecules, it was discovered that none of the prior
devices solve the following problems:
(i) Such devices release macromolecules as soon as the device is in place.
(ii) Such devices cause an initial spike of drug release in the delivery
environment.
(iii) Such devices are difficult to handle during implantation, due to
their flexibility.
(iv) Non-hydrated (or xerogel) devices are relatively fragile as compared
to hydrated hydrogel devices, in that their rate controlling membranes are
quite brittle and tend to chip or crack when handled (e.g., during
implantation), potentially destroying the sealed reservoir environment
required for zero-order release.
The present invention solves all of the foregoing problems through the use
of an initially partially-hydrated, non-biodegradable, hydrogel
rate-limiting membrane surrounding a suitable carrier and a macromolecular
composition.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Devices are disclosed for the delayed/sustained release of macromolecules
having a molecular weight greater than about 1,000, including the
administration of macromolecular pharmaceutical compositions. The devices
include a carrier, e.g., a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, saturated
with, and containing excess solid of, the macromolecular composition. An
initially partially-hydrated, non-biodegradable, hydrogel rate-limiting
membrane formed of a homopolymer or a copolymer (a "[co]polymer") material
surrounds the carrier. The devices of the invention are provided with the
membrane being only partially hydrated; i.e., sufficiently hydrated to be
non-brittle, but hydrated only to such an extent that the devices remain
structurally manipulable and are substantially non-permeable to the
macromolecular composition prior to placement in the delivery environment.
The devices useful in the invention include surgical implants,
suppositories, vaginal inserts and ocular inserts of the reservoir-,
monolithic-, monolithic reservoir-, and monolithic with rate controlling
barrier layer-types. They all have in common the use of a hydrogel
rate-limiting membrane to control the release of the active agent(s)
contained therein; in the monolithic-type device, the carrier also serves
as the rate-limiting membrane.
In one aspect, the invention covers a pharmaceutical formulation designed
for delayed/sustained release of an effective amount of a drug over an
extended period of time, wherein the formulation comprises at least one
hormonally active, water-soluble polypeptide in an effective amount
greater then a conventional single dose, suspended in a carrier (e.g.,
silicone oil or a [co]polymer) and surrounded with a membrane (e.g.,
initially partially hydrated, crosslinked or non-crosslinked [co]polymers
including hydroxyet | | |