|
|  Get related patents on CD |
| United States Patent | 4975581 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/4975581.html |
| Inventor(s) | Robinson; Mark R. (Albuquerque, NM);
Ward; Kenneth J. (Albuquerque, NM);
Eaton; Robert P. (Albuquerque, NM);
Haaland; David M. (Albuquerque, NM) |
| Abstract | The characteristics of a biological fluid sample having an analyte are
determined from a model constructed from plural known biological fluid
samples. The model is a function of the concentration of materials in the
known fluid samples as a function of absorption of wideband infrared
energy. The wideband infrared energy is coupled to the analyte containing
sample so there is differential absorption of the infrared energy as a
function of the wavelength of the wideband infrared energy incident on the
analyte containing sample. The differential absorption causes intensity
variations of the infrared energy incident on the analyte containing
sample as a function of sample wavelength of the energy, and concentration
of the unknown analyte is determined from the thus-derived intensity
variations of the infrared energy as a function of wavelength from the
model absorption versus wavelength function. |
| |
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
December 4, 1990 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
June 21, 1989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 4883953 Koashi 250/226 Nov,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4882492 Schlager 250/346 Nov,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4801805 Butler 250/343 Jan,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4800279 Hieftje 250/339.09 Jan,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4798954 Stevenson 250/341.7 Jan,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4642778 Hieftje 702/23 Feb,1987 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4509522 Manuccia 600/326 Apr,1985 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4427889 Muller 250/339.11 Jan,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4169976 Cirri 219/121.72 Oct,1979 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3973118 LaMontagne 250/226 Aug,1976 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Technical Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed:
1. A method of determining noninvasively and in vivo one or more unknown
values of known characteristics, such as the concentration of an analyte,
of a biological fluid in a mammal, said method comprising the steps of:
(a) irradiating in vivo and noninvasively said biological fluid having said
unknown values of said known characteristics with infrared energy having
at least several wavelengths so that there is differential absorption of
at least some of said wavelengths by said biological fluid as a function
of said wavelengths and said characteristics, said differential absorption
causing intensity variations of said wavelengths incident from said
biological fluid as a function of said wavelengths and said unknown values
of said known characteristics;
(b) measuring said intensity variations from said biological fluid; and
(c) calculating said unknown values of said known characteristics in said
biological fluid from said measured intensity variations utilizing an
algorithm and a mathematical calibration model, said algorithm including
all independent sources of intensity variations v. wavelengths information
obtained from irradiating a set of samples in which said values of said
known characteristics are known, said algorithm also including more
wavelengths than samples in said set of samples, said model being
constructed from said set of samples and being a function of said known
values and characteristics and said intensity variations v. wavelengths
information obtained from irradiating said set of samples.
2. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein said set of samples is
irradiated in vivo and noninvasively.
3. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein said infrared energy is near
infrared energy.
4. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein said algorithm is selected
from the group including partial least squares and principal component
regression.
5. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein said biological fluid is
irradiated by directing said infrared energy to be incident on a portion
of said mammal which includes said biological fluid, so that said
biological fluid partially absorbs said incident infrared energy.
6. The method as set forth in claim 5, wherein said infrared energy
incident on said portion of said mammal passes through said portion.
7. The method as set forth in claim 6, wherein said portion is a digit.
8. The method as set forth in claim 5, wherein said infrared energy
incident on said portion of said mammal is partially absorbed by said
portion and partially diffusely reflected from said portion.
9. The method as set forth in claim 8, wherein said portion is a head.
10. The method as set forth in claim 5, wherein said irradiating is
accomplished by coupling said infrared energy to said portion of said
mammal by a fiber optic device.
11. The method as set forth in claim 10, wherein said infrared energy from
said portion of said mammal is transmitted from said portion by said fiber
optic device.
12. The method as set forth in claim 10, wherein said infrared energy from
said portion of said mammal is transmitted by a second fiber optic device.
13. The method as set forth in claim 11, further including the step of
detecting outlier samples in said set of samples.
14. The method as set forth in claim 13, wherein said detection of outlier
samples in said set includes the step of comparing said intensity v.
wavelength responses of each sample in said set to said model, the
comparing step yielding a measure of the magnitude of the difference
between said intensity v. wavelength responses of each of said samples and
said model.
15. The method as set forth in claim 14, further including performing a
statistical test to indicate the probability of said magnitude being
caused by random chance, and classifying as outliers those of said samples
in said set having an excessively low probability.
16. The method as set forth in claim 15 wherein the statistical test is the
F ratio test.
17. The method as set forth in claim 13, wherein said detection of outlier
samples in said set includes the step of comparing said known values of
said characteristics of each sample in said set to the calculated value of
said characteristic, said calculated value being based on an estimate
derived from said model of said value of said characteristic for each said
sample to determine a measure of the magnitude of the difference between
said known value of said characteristic and said calculated value of said
characteristic.
18. The method as set forth in claim 17, further including performing a
statistical test to indicate the probability of said magnitude being
caused by random chance, and classifying as outliers those of said samples
in said set having an excessively low probability.
19. The method as set forth in claim 18, wherein the statistical test is
the F ratio test.
20. The method as set forth in claim 11, further including the step of
determining whether said intensity variations v. wavelengths response of
said biological fluid with unknown values of said known characteristics is
an outlier.
21. The method as set forth in claim 20, wherein said determination of
whether said intensity variations v. wavelengths response of said
biological fluid is an outlier includes the step of comparing said
intensity variations v. wavelengths from said biological fluid to said
model, the comparing step yielding a measure of the magnitude of the
difference between said intensity variations v. wavelengths of said
biological fluid and said model.
22. The method as set forth in claim 21, further including performing a
statistical test to indicate the probability of said magnitude being
caused by random chance, and classifying as outliers those of said values
having an excessively low probability.
23. The method as set forth in claim 22, wherein the statistical test is
the F ratio test.
24. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein said known characteristics
are minor components of said biological fluid and said unknown values are
less than 2.0 weight percent of said biological fluid.
25. A method of determining invasively and in vivo one or more unknown
values of known characteristics, such as the concentration of an analyte,
of a biological fluid in a mammal, said method comprising the steps of:
(a) coupling invasively and in vivo a source of infrared energy with an
internal portion of said mammal;
(b) irradiating in vivo and invasively said biological fluid having said
unknown values of said known characteristics with said infrared energy
having at least several wavelengths so that there is differential
absorption of at least some of said wavelengths by said biological fluid
as a function of said wavelengths and said characteristics, said
differential absorption causing intensity variations of said wavelengths
incident from said biological fluid as a function of said wavelengths and
said characteristics having unknown values;
(c) measuring said intensity variations from said biological fluid; and
(d) calculating said unknown values of said known characteristics in said
biological fluid from said measured intensity variations from said
biological fluid utilizing an algorithm and a mathematical calibration
model, said algorithm including all independent sources of intensity
variations v. wavelengths information obtained from irradiating a set of
samples in which said values of said known characteristics are known, said
algorithm also being capable of using more wavelengths than samples in
said set of samples, said model being constructed from said set of samples
and being a function of said known values and characteristics and said
intensity variations v. wavelengths information obtained from irradiating
said set of samples.
26. The method as set forth in claim 25, wherein said samples are
irradiated invasively and in vivo.
27. The method as set forth in claim 25, wherein said algorithm is selected
from the group including partial least squares and principal component
regression.
28. The method as st forth in claim 25, wherein said source of infrared
energy is coupled with said mammal by at least partially implanting a
fiber optic device in said mammal.
29. The method as set forth in claim 28, wherein at least a portion of said
fiber optic device is used as an attenuated total reflectance (ATR)
device.
30. The method as set forth in claim 29, comprising passing said fiber
optic device through a portion of said mammal.
31. The method as set forth in claim 25, comprising implanting an ATR
crystal in said mammal, said ATR device being coupled to said source of
infrared energy.
32. The method as set forth in claim 25, comprising implanting said source
of infrared energy and apparatus for measuring said intensity variations
in said mammal proximate to a supply of said biological fluid.
33. The method as set forth in claim 32, comprising positioning said source
of infrared energy and said measuring apparatus on opposite sides of said
biological fluid.
34. The method as set forth in claim 33, comprising positioning said source
of infrared energy and said measuring apparatus on opposite sides of at
least one blood vessel of said mammal.
35. The method as set forth in claim 25, wherein said infrared energy is
either in the mid-infrared or near-infrared spectrum.
36. The method as set forth in claim 25, further including the step of
detecting outlier samples in said set of samples.
37. The method as set forth in claim 36, wherein said detection of outlier
samples in said set includes the step of comparing said intensity v.
wavelength responses of each sample in said set to said model to determine
a measure of the magnitude of the difference between said intensity v.
wavelength responses of each of said samples and said model.
38. The method as set forth in claim 37, further including performing a
statistical test to indicate the probability of said magnitude being
caused by random chance, and classifying as outliers those of said samples
in said set having an excessively low probability.
39. The method as set forth in claim 38, wherein the statistical test is
the F ratio test.
40. The method as set forth in claim 25, wherein said detection of outlier
samples in said set includes the step of comparing said known values of
said characteristics of each sample in said set to the calculated value of
said characteristic, said calculated value being based on an estimate
derived from said model of said value of said characteristic for each said
sample to determine a measure of the magnitude of the difference between
said known value of said characteristic and said calculated value of said
characteristic.
41. The method as set forth in claim 40, further including performing a
statistical test to indicate the probability of said magnitude being
caused by random chance, and classifying as outliers those of said samples
in said set having an excessively low probability.
42. The method as set forth in claim 41, wherein the statistical test is
the F ratio test.
43. The method as set forth in claim 25, further including the step of
determining whether said intensity variations v. wavelengths of said
biological fluid with unknown values of said known characteristics is an
outlier.
44. The method as set forth in claim 43, wherein said determination of
whether said intensity variations v. wavelengths of said biological fluid
is an outlier includes the step of comparing said intensity variations v.
wavelengths from said biological fluid to said model, said comparing step
yielding a measure of the magnitude of the difference between said
intensity variations v. wavelengths between said biological fluid and said
model.
45. The method as set forth in claim 44, further including performing a
statistical test to indicate the probability of said magnitude being
caused by random chance, and classifying as outliers those of said values
having an excessively low probability.
46. The method as set forth in claim 45, wherein the statistical test is
the F ratio test.
47. The method as set forth in claim 25, wherein said known characteristics
are minor components of said biological fluid and said unknown values are
less than 2.0 weight percent of said biological fluid.
48. A method of determining in vitro one or more unknown values of known
characteristics, such as the concentration of an analyte, of biological
fluid, said method comprising the steps of:
(a) irradiating in vitro said biological fluid having said unknown values
of said known characteristics with infrared energy having at least several
wavelengths so that there is differential absorption of at least some of
said wavelengths by said biological fluid as a function of said
wavelengths and said characteristics, said differential absorption causing
intensity variations of said wavelengths incident from said biological
fluid as a function of said wavelengths and said characteristics having
unknown values;
(b) measuring said intensity variations from said biological fluid; and
(c) calculating said unknown values of said known characteristics in said
biological fluid from said measured intensity variations from said
biological fluid, utilizing an algorithm and a mathematical calibration
model, said algorithm including all independent sources of intensity
variations v. wavelengths information obtained from irradiating a set of
samples in which said values of said known characteristics are known, said
algorithm also including more wavelengths than samples in said set of
samples, said model being constructed from said set of samples and being a
function of said known values and characteristics, said intensity
variations v. wavelengths information being obtained by irradiating said
set of samples.
49. The method as set forth in claim 48, wherein said samples are
irradiated in vitro.
50. The method as set forth in claim 48, wherein said algorithm is selected
from the group including, partial least squares and principal component
regression.
51. The method as set forth in claim 48, further including the step of
detecting outlier samples in said set of samples.
52. The method as set forth in claim 48, further including the step of
determining whether said intensity variations v. wavelengths response of
said biological fluid with unknown values of said characteristics is an
outlier.
53. The method as set forth in claim 48, wherein said known characteristics
are minor components of said biological fluid and said unknown values are
less than 2.0 weight percent of said biological fluid.
54. Apparatus for determining at least one unknown value of a known
characteristic, such as the concentration of an analyte, in a biological
fluid, said apparatus comprising:
(A) a source of infrared energy having at least several wavelengths;
(B) means for coupling said at least several wavelengths of said infrared
energy to said biological fluid to enable said biological fluid to
differentially absorb at least some of said wavelengths, said differential
absorption causing intensity variations of said infrared energy incident
from said biological fluid as a function of said at least several
wavelengths of said energy and said unknown value of said known
characteristic;
(C) means for measuring said intensity variations; and
(D) computer means including:
i. a stored model constructed from a set of samples in which the values of
said known characteristic are known, said model being a function of said
known values from said set of samples and intensity v. wavelength
information obtained from said set of samples, and
ii. an algorithm including (a) all independent sources of said intensity
variations v. said wavelengths information from both said set of samples
and said biological fluid and (b) more wavelengths than samples, said
algorithm utilizing said model for calculating said unknown value of said
known characteristic of said biological fluid from said measured intensity
variations from said biological fluid.
55. The apparatus as set forth in claim 54, further including means for
determining whether said intensity variations v. wavelength of said known
characteristic in said biological fluid is an outlier.
56. The apparatus as set forth in claim 54, wherein said means for coupling
includes an attenuated total reflectance (ATR) device.
57. The apparatus as set forth in claim 56, further including a flow cell,
said ATR device being positioned in said cell for in vitro sampling.
58. The apparatus as set forth in claim 56, wherein said ATR device
includes a biocompatible coating on at least a portion thereof for
enabling said portion of said ATR device to contact said biological fluid
in vivo.
59. The apparatus as set forth in claim 54, wherein said means for coupling
includes a fiber optic device.
60. The apparatus as set forth in claim 59, wherein a portion of said fiber
optic device forms an ATR device.
61. The apparatus as set forth in claim 59, wherein said fiber optic device
includes a portion for transmitting said infrared energy to said
biological fluid and a separate portion for transmitting said infrared
energy from said biological fluid to said apparatus.
62. The apparatus as set forth in claim 54, wherein said apparatus includes
a first portion adapted to be positioned on one side of an in vivo source
of biological fluid and a second portion adapted to be positioned on
another side of said in vivo source of biological fluid.
63. The apparatus as set forth in claim 54, wherein said means for coupling
includes means for transmitting said infrared energy to an in vivo source
of said biological fluid and means for measuring diffuse infrared
reflection from said in vivo source.
64. The apparatus as set forth in claim 54, further including means for
transmitting signals from said computer means to a means for changing said
value of said known characteristic.
65. The apparatus as set forth in claim 64, wherein said means for changing
is an insulin pump.
66. The apparatus of claim 54, wherein said means for measuring said
intensity variations includes an array of infrared sensors, means for
frequency dispersing said intensity variations of said at least several
wavelengths onto said sensors, different ones of said sensors being
provided for different ones of said at least several wavelengths, so that
said different ones of said sensors derive different electric signals.
67. The apparatus of claim 66, wherein said array includes multiple
individual filters, each having a bandpass for each one of said at least
several wavelengths, said filters being positioned relative to said
sensors so that said infrared energy passed through each of said filters
is incident on a corresponding one of said sensors.
68. The apparatus of claim 66, wherein said array includes a sheet of
infrared gradient wavelength responsive material having areas positioned
relative to said sensors so that said infrared energy passed through
different areas of said sheet is incident on a corresponding one of said
sensors.
69. The apparatus of claim 66, wherein each of said sensors is constructed
to be responsive to a different one of said at least several wavelengths.
70. A method of determining in vivo at least one unknown concentration of a
known characteristic in a biological fluid in a mammal, said
characteristic being a trace component in said biological fluid, said
concentration being less than 2.0 weight percent of said biological fluid,
said method comprising:
(a) irradiating in vivo said biological fluid having said unknown
concentration of said known characteristic with infrared energy having
said at least several wavelengths so that there is differential absorption
of at least some of said wavelengths by said biological fluid as a
function of said wavelengths and said unknown concentration, said
differential absorption causing intensity variations of said wavelengths
incident from said biological fluid as a function of said wavelengths and
said unknown concentration;
(b) measuring said intensity variations from said biological fluid;
(c) calculating said unknown concentration in said biological fluid from
said measured intensity variations from said biological fluid utilizing an
algorithm and a mathematical calibration model, said algorithm including
all independent sources of intensity variations v. wavelengths information
obtained from irradiating a set of samples in which the concentrations of
said known characteristic are known, said algorithm including more
wavelengths than samples in said set of samples, said model being
constructed from said set of samples and being a function of said known
concentrations of said known characteristic and the intensity variations
v. wavelengths information obtained from irradiating said set of samples;
and
(d) determining whether said intensity variations v. wavelengths of said
biological fluids is an outlier.
71. The method as set forth in claim 70, wherein said known characteristic
is glucose. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to determining the nature, i.e.,
the similarity or concentration, of a biological analyte in comparison
with a model constructed from plural known biological fluids, and, more
particularly, to such a method and apparatus wherein a sample of
biological fluid containing the analyte is irradiated with infrared energy
having at least several wavelengths to cause differential absorption by
the analyte as a function of the wavelengths and properties of the
analyte.
BACKGROUND ART
For various care and treatment of mammal patients, it is necessary to
determine concentrations of certain species in biological fluids. For
instance, diabetics must be apprised of their blood glucose concentrations
to enable insulin dosage to be adjusted. To determine blood glucose
concentrations, blood is presently drawn several times per day by the
diabetic, usually via a finger prick. If the blood glucose concentrations
in such individuals are not properly maintained, the individuals become
susceptible to numerous physiological problems, such as blindness,
circulatory disorders, coronary artery disease, and renal failure. For
these reasons, a substantial improvement in the quality of life of persons
suffering from various maladies, such as diabetes mellitus, could be
attained if the concentrations of species in body fluids are
non-invasively and/or continuously determined. For example, for diabetic
patients having external or implantable insulin pumps, a feedback loop for
these pumps could be controlled by continuously monitoring glucose
concentrations, to enable an artificial pancreas to be developed.
Exemplary systems have been previously proposed to monitor glucose in
blood, as is necessary, for example, to control diabetic patients. This
prior art is represented, for example, by Kaiser, U.S. Pat. No. 4,169,676,
Muller, U.S. Pat. No. 4,427,889, and Dahne et al, European Patent
Publication No. 0 160 768, and Bauer et al, Analytica Chimica Acta 197
(1987) pp. 295-301.
In Kaiser, glucose in blood is determined by irradiating a sample of the
blood with a carbon dioxide laser source emitting a coherent beam, at a
single frequency, in the mid-infrared region. An infrared beam derived
from the laser source is coupled to the sample by way of an attenuated
total reflectance crystal for the purpose of contacting the blood sample.
The apparatus uses double beam instrumentation to examine the difference
in absorption at the single frequency in the presence and absence of a
sample. The reliability of the Kaiser device is materially impaired in
certain situations because of the reliance on a single frequency beam for
reasons explained below. Also, we have found from calculations based on
available information that Kaiser's statement anent optical energy
penetrating the skin to the depth of the blood capillaries is unlikely due
to water absorption of the mid-infrared beam.
Muller discloses a system for quantifying glucose in blood by irradiating a
sample of the blood with energy in a single beam from a laser operating at
two frequencies in the mid-infrared region. The infrared radiation is
either transmitted directly to the sample or by way of an attenuated total
reflectance crystal for in vitro sampling. One frequency that irradiates
the sample is in the 10.53-10.65 micrometer range, while the other
irradiating frequency is in the 9.13-9.17 micrometer range. The radiation
at the first frequency establishes a baseline absorption by the sample,
while glucose absorption by the sample is determined from the intensity
reduction caused by the sample at the second wavelength. The absorption
ratio by the sample at the first and second frequencies quantifies the
glucose of the sample. There is no glucose absorption at the first
wavelength.
Dahne et al employs near-infrared spectroscopy for non-invasively
transmitting optical energy in the nearinfrared spectrum through a finger
or earlobe of a subject. Also discussed is the use of near-infrared energy
diffusely reflected from deep within the tissue. Responses are derived at
two different wavelengths to quantify glucose in the subject. One of the
wavelengths is used to determine background absorption, while the other
wavelength is used to determine glucose absorption. The ratio of the
derived intensity at the two different wavelengths determines the quantity
of glucose in the analyte biological fluid sample.
Bauer et al discloses monitoring glucose through the use of
Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry wherein several absorbance versus
wavelength curves are illustrated. A glucose concentration versus
absorbance calibration curve, discussed in the last paragraph on p. 298,
is constructed from several samples having known concentrations, in
response to the intensity of the infrared energy absorbed by the samples
at one wavelength, indicated as preferably 1035 cm.sup.-1.
All of the foregoing prior art techniques thus use only a single frequency
analysis or ratio of two frequencies to determine a single proportionality
constant describing a relationship between absorption of the infrared
energy by the sample and concentration of a constituent of the biological
fluid sample being analyzed, usually glucose. Hence, the prior art
analysis is univariate since absorption by the constituent of interest at
a single wavelength is determined.
However, univariate analysis has a tendency to be inaccurate in situations
wherein there are concentration variations of any substance which absorbs
at the analysis frequency. Biological systems are subject to numerous
physiological perturbations over time and from person to person. The
perturbations cause inaccuracies in univariate analysis, thereby
decreasing the accuracy and precision of such analysis. The physiological
perturbations involving any substance which absorbs at the analysis
frequencies do not permit an operator of a system utilizing univariate
analysis to recognize the resulting inaccuracy. In addition,
nonlinearities may arise from spectroscopic instrumentation, refractive
index dispersion, or interactions between molecules of the sample which
cannot generally be modelled by univariate techniques. In addition,
unknown biological materials in the sample have a tendency to interfere
with the analysis process, particularly when these materials are present
in varying amounts. Also the univariate techniques are usually not capable
of identifying outlier samples, i.e., samples with data or constituents or
spectra among the calibration or unknown data which differ from the
remainder of the calibration set.
The described prior art systems utilizing midinfrared energy are not
feasible for non-invasive in vivo determinations of glucose concentrations
because of penetration depth limitations.
The most frequently employed prior art techniques for determining the
concentration of molecular substances in biological fluids have used
enzymatic, chemical and/or immunological methods. However, all of these
techniques require invasive methods to draw a blood sample from a subject;
typically, blood must be drawn several times a day by a finger prick, such
as presently employed by a diabetic. For example, in the determination of
glucose by diabetics, such invasive techniques must be performed using
present technology. It would be highly desirable to provide a
lessinvasive, continuous or semi-continuous system for automatically
analyzing glucose concentrations in the control of diabetes mellitus.
It is, accordingly, an object of the present invention to provide a new and
improved method of and apparatus for determining characteristics of a
biological analyte sample.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a new and improved
apparatus for and method of using infrared energy for analyzing biological
fluids wherein the apparatus and method are particularly suitable for
analyzing samples having concentrations of substances which variably or
differentially absorb the infrared energy.
Another object of the invention is to provide a new and improved method of
and apparatus for utilizing infrared energy to determine a characteristic,
e.g., concentration, of a biological analyte by comparison of the
absorption characteristics of said sample with a mathematical model
constructed from several spectra of biological fluids having known
absorption versus wavelength characteristics at known analyte
concentrations.
A further object of the invention is to provide a new and improved
apparatus for and method of analyzing biological fluids with infrared
energy wherein interference with the infrared energy due to numerous
physiological perturbations over time and between people does not have a
particularly adverse effect on the results.
An additional object of the invention is to provide a new and improved
apparatus for and method of using infrared energy to analyze biological
fluids, wherein non-linearities due to various causes, for example,
spectroscopic instrumentation, refractive index dispersion, and/or
inter-molecular interactions, do not have an adverse effect on the
analysis results.
An additional object of the present invention is to provide a new and
improved apparatus for and method of using infrared energy to determine
the nature of a biological sample wherein the presence of unknown
biological materials in the sample does not interfere with the analysis of
the sample, as long as these unknown biological materials are present in a
calibration set which is used to derive a mathematical model which
represents the response of known fluids to the infrared energy.
A further object of the invention is to provide a new and improved
apparatus for and method of using infrared energy to determine
characteristics of biological fluids wherein outlier samples subsisting in
a calibration set used to derive a mathematical model are identified and
either eliminated or accommodated so as not to have an adverse effect on
the determination.
Another object of the invention is to provide a method of and apparatus for
identifying the presence of outliers. The quality of the calibration
results and the reliability of the unknown sample analyses can be
critically dependent on the detection of outlier samples. In the
calibration set, an outlier is a sample that does not exhibit the
characteristic relationship between composition and the absorbance
spectrum of the other calibration samples. During prediction, an outlier
is a sample that is not representative of samples in the calibration set.
Outliers in the calibration samples can impair the precision and accuracy
of the calibration and limit the quality of the analyses of all future
samples. The results of the analyses of outlier unknown samples by
multivariate calibration cannot be considered reliable, and samples
containing outliers should be analyzed by other methods. Thus, efficient
detection of outlier samples is crucial for the successful application and
wide acceptance of multivariate spectral analyses. For example, outliers
occur as a result of changes in instrumental response, incorrect analyte
determination by the reference method, unique type of sample, unexpected
components, unusual baseline, incorrectly labeled or documented sample,
etc.
Still an additional object of the invention is to provide a new and
improved biological fluid analysis apparatus and method which is
particularly adaptable, in certain embodiments, to non-invasive
determinations.
THE INVENTION
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, the concentration
of a biological fluid containing an analyte is determined from a model
constructed from plural known biological fluid samples. The model is a
function of the concentration of materials in the known samples as a
function of absorption at at least several wavelengths of infrared energy.
The infrared energy is coupled to the analyte containing sample so there
is differing absorption of the infrared energy as a function of the
several wavelengths and characteristics of the analyte containing sample.
The differing absorption causes intensity variations of the infrared
energy passing through the analyte containing sample as a function of the
several wavelengths. The thus-derived intensity variations of the infrared
energy as a function of the several wavelengths are compared with the
calibration model relating concentration to plural absorption versus
wavelength patterns derived from the plural known biological fluid samples
having various concentrations. The comparison enables the determination of
the analyte concentration from the measured intensity variations for the
biological fluid containing the analyte. In the preferred embodiment, the
comparison is made in a computer by the partial least squares method,
although other multivariate techniques can be employed.
In the computer implementation, the intensity variations as a function of
wavelength are converted into plural first electric signals, such that
different ones of the first electric signals are assigned to different
ones of the wavelengths. The magnitude of each of the different first
signals is determined by the intensity of the transmitted energy at the
wavelength assigned to that particular first signal. The transmitted
energy in the presence of the analyte containing sample is statistically
compared with the transmitted energy in the absence of the sample to
determine the absorption by the biological analyte containing fluid.
A multivariate statistical method, preferably using the partial least
squares technique in a manner known in the statistical art, enables a
model to be constructed of the infrared absorption versus wavelength
characteristics and analyte concentrations. Following determination of the
calibration model, the infrared absorption versus wavelength of the
unknown fluid enables estimation of the analyte concentration. For
examp | | |