|
|
|
| United States Patent | 4990229 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/4990229.html |
| Inventor(s) | Campbell; Gregor (Glendale, CA);
Conn; Robert W. (Los Angeles, CA);
Shoji; Tatsuo (Nagoya, JP) |
| Abstract | The high density RF plasma generator of this invention uses special antenna
configurations (15) to launch RF waves at low frequency such as 13.56 MHz
along a magnetic field supplied by an external magnetic field generator
(16.17) in a discharge space (14) where the working gas is introduced and
which is used alone or in conjunction with a process chamber (18) where
specimen substrates (20) are located to either deposit or etch films from
a substrate or to sputter deposit films to a substrate. The plasma
etching, deposition and/or sputtering system comprises the high density RF
plasma generator, the external magnetic field, the gas injection and
control system, the antenna system (15) and associated power supplies
(48), the process chamber (18), and the means to couple plasma from the
generator to substrates or targets, including magnetic means (36) to
enhance plasma uniformity at the substrates (20) or targets (92). |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
February 5, 1991 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
June 13, 1989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 3247515
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3875068
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4876983 Fukuda 118/722 Oct,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4859908 Yoshida 315/111.81 Aug,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4828649 Davis 438/711 May,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4826585 Davis 204/298.37 May,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4810935 Boswell 315/111.41 Mar,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4733133 Dandl 315/111.41 Mar,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4483737 Mantei 438/732 Nov,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4438368 Abe 315/39 Mar,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4438368 Abe 315/39 Mar,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4368092 Steinberg 156/345.48 Jan,1983 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4216405 Stenzel 313/310 Aug,1980 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
|
|
|
| Market Size |
|
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market
sector:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Market Share |
|
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Reasonable Royalty |
|
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
|
| | |
| |
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
|
| Market Size | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Market Share | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Reasonable Royalty | N/A | [No votes] |
| | N/A | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Technical Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed is as follows:
1. A plasma processing apparatus, comprising:
(a) an antenna, the antenna radiating electromagnetic waves, the antenna
comprising: (i) a first current loop, the first current loop residing in a
first plane and; (ii) a second current loop, the second current loop
residing in a second plane, the first and second current loops residing in
a spaced apart relationship wherein the first plane and the second plane
are substantially parallel;
(b) a plasma generation chamber, the plasma generation chamber being
proximate to and in electromagnetic communication with the antenna, such
that a line perpendicular to the planes of the first and second current
loops defines a longitudinal axis of the plasma generation chamber;
(c) a first fluid injector, the first fluid injector introducing a fluid
into the plasma generation chamber, thereby permitting the creation of a
plasma within the plasma generation chamber;
(d) a magnetic field generator, the magnetic field generator generating a
magnetic field;
(e) a process chamber, the plasma being transported to the process chamber
by the magnetic field;
(f) a second fluid injector, the second fluid injector introducing a fluid
into the process chamber.
(g) a current controller, the current controller controlling the current
within the magnetic field generator, thereby controlling plasma shape;
(h) a substrate holder, the substrate holder residing within the process
chamber;
(i) an auxiliary radio frequency generator, the auxiliary radio frequency
generator adapted for applying radio frequency power to a substrate
residing on the substrate holder;
(j) a radio frequency exciter, the radio frequency exciter generating a
radio frequency voltage and current; and
(k) a matching network, the matching network interconnecting the radio
frequency exciter and the antenna, thereby promoting the efficient
transfer of radio frequency energy from the radio frequency exciter to the
antenna.
2. The plasma processing apparatus of claim 1, wherein the generated
magnetic field is parallel to the longitudinal axis of the plasma
generation chamber.
3. The plasma processing apparatus of claim 2, wherein the substrate holder
is supported within the process chamber in a state of substantial
electrical insulation.
4. The plasma processing apparatus of claim 3, wherein the substrate holder
comprises:
(a) A copper block;
(b) Thermal control means, permitting temperature regulation of the copper
block.
5. The plasma processing apparatus of claim 4, wherein the second fluid
injector is formed as a porous element, thereby permitting a gas to be
introduced within the element, the gas escaping from the element into the
process chamber.
6. The plasma processing apparatus of claim 5, wherein the porous element
is formed as a ring, the ring being constructed of tubing, the tubing
being perforated so as to permit the gas to escape from the ring into the
process chamber.
7. The plasma processing apparatus of claim 6, wherein the plasma
generation chamber is a quartz cylinder.
8. The plasma processing apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a
plurality of magnets, the magnets being arranged in a circumferential
manner proximate to the process chamber, succeeding magnets having
opposite orientations of north and south poles.
9. The plasma processing apparatus of claim 8, wherein the process chamber
has a cross sectional area that is larger than a cross section of the
plasma generation chamber.
10. The plasma processing apparatus of claim 9, wherein the process chamber
is formed substantially of stainless steel.
11. The plasma process apparatus of claim 10, wherein the cross section of
the process chamber is a regular geometric shape.
12. A sputter deposition device according to claim 9, further comprising
(a) at least one target;
(b) biasing means, the biasing means applying a voltage to the target,
thereby causing ions with the plasma to bombard the target and causing
material from the target to be deposited on the substrate.
13. The sputter deposition device of claim 12, wherein the target is a
magnetron sputter target.
14. The sputter deposition device of claim 12, wherein the substrate holder
is formed as an aperture, thereby permitting the plasma to travel past the
substrate holder enroute to the target, the plasma thereby bombarding the
target and sputtering material onto the substrate.
15. The plasma processing apparatus of claim 8, further comprising:
(a) a plurality of plasma generation chambers, each plasma generation
chamber being cooperatively connected to the processing chamber;
(b) a plurality of antennas, each antenna being electromagnetically coupled
to a plasma generation chamber; and
(c) a plurality of magnetic field generators, each magnetic field generator
being magnetically coupled to each plasma generation chamber.
16. The plasma processing apparatus of claim 1, further comprising
(a) a plurality of plasma generation chambers, each plasma generation
chamber being cooperatively connected to the process chamber, each plasma
generation chamber being coaxial to the longitudinal axis of the plasma
generation chamber;
(b) a plurality of antennas, each antenna being electromagnetically coupled
to a plasma generation chamber;
(c) a plurality of magnetic field coils, the magnetic field coil being
proximate to the process chamber;
(d) a plurality of magnetic field generators, each magnetic field generator
being magnetically coupled to each plasma generator; and
(d) a plurality of substrate holders mounted within the process chamber.
17. A sputter deposition device according to claim 1, further comprising:
(a) First magnetic field coils, the first magnetic field coils being
magnetically coupled and proximate to the plasma generation chamber, the
first magnetic field coils generating a magnetic field in a first
direction;
(b) Second magnetic field coils, the second magnetic field coils being
magnetically coupled and proximate to the process chamber, the second
magnetic field coils generating a magnetic field in a second direction,
the second direction being substantially parallel to the first direction;
(c) Third magnetic field coils, the third magnetic field coils being
magnetically coupled and proximate to a target, the target residing within
the process chamber, the magnetic field coils causing the plasma to
conform to the target; and
(d) A negative voltage power supply, the negative voltage power supply
being electrically coupled to the target, the target thereby depositing
material onto the substrate.
18. A sputter deposition device according to claim 17, further comprising a
baffle, the baffle residing within the process chamber, the baffle
permitting control of fluid injection into the process chamber. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a plasma deposition or etching method and
various apparatus for depositing a thin film onto a substrate or removal
(etching) of a film from a substrate.
Description of Related Technology
Etching
Plasma etching involves using chemically active atoms or energetic ions to
remove material from a substrate. It is a key technology in the
fabrication of semiconductor integrated circuits. However, before the
advent of microwave plasmas utilizing the electron cyclotron resonance
(ECR) it was becoming difficult for conventional plasma etching techniques
to satisfy the requirements dictated by the increase in device packing
density. Specifically, the requirement for fine pattern etching
(anisotropic etching) and the requirements for low damage and high
selectivity could hardly be satisfied at the same time.
Deposition
Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition is a widely used technique to
deposit materials on substrates in a host of applications. In normal CVD
the chemical reaction is driven by the temperature of the substrate and
for most reactions is high (>800.degree.C.). The high substrate
temperature needed precludes this method from use in a number of
applications particularly in microelectronics, displays and optical
coatings. The role of the plasma is to dissociate and activate the
chemical gas so that the substrate temperature can be reduced. The rate of
dissociation, activation and ionization is proportional to the density of
the plasma. It is therefore of importance to make the plasma as dense as
possible.
Sputtering
Sputtering is also a widely used method for depositing materials onto
substrates for a wide variety of applications such as the production of
hard or decorative coatings and the coating of glass. In general, a plasma
is produced at the sputter target material and the sputter target is
biased to a negative voltage of around 700 V. Plasma ions, generally
argon, impact the surface and sputter the material which then transports
as neutral atoms to a substrate. Reactive gases can be introduced to
chemically react with the sputtered atoms at the host substrate in a
process called reactive sputter deposition. Rate is often important and it
is therefore important to make the plasma as dense as possible. Ionization
of reactive gases is also important and is helped by having plasma in the
vicinity of the substrate material. Sputtering is also done by ions
accelerated in an ion or plasma gun and then made to bombard the sputter
target. In this case, a bias voltage on the target is not necessary. For
sputtering insulating materials, RF voltage bias can be applied to the
sputter target.
Existing Methods
There are presently two widely used methods for plasma deposition and
etching, the parallel plate reactor and the ECR plasma deposition system.
Parallel Plate Reactor (Diode)
The RF diode has been widely used for both deposition and etching. It is
described in detail in the book by Chapman ("Glow Discharge Processes"
John Wiley & Sons 1980). It uses RF at 13.56 MHz capacitively coupled to
one electrode while the other electrode is grounded. The pressure in the
system is typically 1 mtorr-1 torr and the plasma density is typically
10.sup.10 electrons per cc. The rate at which both deposition or etching
occurs is dependent on the density of the plasma and the density
(pressure) of the reactive gas used to etch or in CVD processes to
deposit.
In etching, the high pressure needed to sustain the discharge causes
collisions between the ions and the background gas. This causes the paths
of the etching ions or atoms to be ramdomised or non-directional leading
to undercutting of the mask. This is referred to as an isotropic etch. It
is desirable to have the etch atoms or ions be directional so that
straight anisotropic etches can be achieved. At the high pressure used in
RF diode discharges it is necessary for the ions to have high energy (1
keV) to achieve an anisotropic etch. However the high energy of the ions
can cause damage to the substrate, film materials or photoresist.
The plasma is sustained by secondary electrons that are emitted by ions
impacting the cathode. These electrons are accelerated by the voltage drop
across the sheath which is typically 400-1000 V. These fast electrons can
bombard the substrate causing it to have a high voltage sheath drop. This
high voltage can accelerate the ions leading to damage of the substrate or
film material. The presence of high energy electrons leading to high
voltage sheath drops is undesirable.
Electron Cyclotron Resonance Plasmas
The advent of using microwaves at 2.45 GHz and a magnetic field of 875
Gauss to utilize electron cyclotron resonance allowed the generation of
high density plasmas at low pressure. The advantages of this technique for
plasma etching are described by Suzuki in an article entitled "Microwave
Plasma Etching" published in Vacuum, Vol. 34 No. 10/11 (1984). Due to a
low gas pressure (0.04-0.4 Pa) and high plasma density
(1.7-7.times.10.sup.11 electrons/cm.sup.3) anisotropic etch with high etch
rates is achievable.
Suzuki, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,101,411, describes a plasma etching apparatus
using ECR; Matsuo, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,401,054 describes a plasma
deposition apparatus utilizing ECR.
While this technique is desirable over the parallel plate reactor in many
respects it has several limitations. The magnetic field needed is very
high (1-2 kG) which means that heavy, power consuming electromagnets must
be used. The maximum density is limited by either cut-off in certain
configurations or by refraction in other configurations to the value of
1.times.10.sup.12 electrons/cm.sup.3. The expense of the power supply and
necessary hardware to generate and transmit the microwaves is high. The
uniformity (or width of the plasma profile) is not very good.
In the present invention the objective is to use low frequency whistler
waves to generate plasmas of greater density than is possible with the
methods described above. Below the physics of whistler wave propagation in
plasmas is discussed.
Whistler Waves
In a cylindrical geometry these waves are generally referred to as helicon
waves. The classical helicon wave was first investigated by Lehame and
Thonemann and is governed by the following equations:
.gradient..times.E=.delta.B/.delta.t, .gradient..times.B=.mu..multidot.j,
.gradient..multidot.B=0
E=j.times.B./en., E.sub.z =.eta..sub.jz
where E is the Electric Field, B is the magnetic field, j is the current
density, Bo is the vacuum magnetic filed, .mu. is the permitivity, e is
the charge on an electron, n is the density of the plasma and .eta. is the
resistivity of the plasma.
Following the derivation of Chen one can easily find perturbations of the
form B exp(i(m+kz-wt)), and in the .eta.=0 limit the above equations
follow:
.gradient..sup.2 B+.alpha..sup.2 B=0 where .alpha.=(w/k)
(.mu..multidot.en.multidot./B.multidot.)
where
j=(.alpha./.mu..)B
and w is the angular frequency of the wave, k is the wave number,
2.pi./.lambda., where .lambda. is the wavelength. These equations can be
solved in cylindrical coordinates to yield the dispersion relation:
m.alpha.J.sub.m (T a)+TkaJ.sub.m.sup.1 (T a)=0
where, J.sub.m is a Bessel function of the first kind, J.sub.m is a
derivative of J.sub.m with respect to its argument and T is a transverse
wave number defined by
T.sup.2 =.alpha..sup.2 -k.sup.2
It is important to remember that m is the mode number that describes the l
dependence of perturbations of the form B exp(i)ml+kz-wt)
The two lowest modes satisfy
J.sub.1 (T a)=0 ( m=O)
J.sub.1 (T a)=T k a/2.alpha.(J.sub.2 -J 0) (m-1)
This leads to the simple relation
[(w/wc) (w.sub.p.sup.2 /c.sup.2 k.sub.z.sup.2)].sup.2 =1+(3.83/k.sub.z
a).sup.2
where
w.sub.c =cyclotron angular frequency
w.sub.p =plasma frequency
for the m=O mode.
The above derivation is important to understand how to design the antenna
in order to excite the desired mode.
Another important mechanism to understand is the damping of the wave by the
plasma. In the papers by Boswell wave damping by electron collisions could
not explain the experimentally observed results. Chen, however, determined
that Landau damping was responsible for the large damping observed
experimentally. Landau damping is a collisionless damping of waves in a
plasma due to particles in the plasma that have a velocity nearly equal to
the phase velocity of the wave. These particles travel with the wave, do
not see a rapidly fluctuating electric field and so can effectively
exchange energy with the wave. In a plasma there are electrons both faster
and slower than the wave. In a Maxwellian distribution, however, there are
more slow electrons that fast ones and so there are more particles taking
energy from the wave than vice versa.
The damping rate due to Landau damping has been calculated by Chen for
helicon waves and can be expressed as:
Damping Rate=Jm(K.sub.z)/Re(K.sub.z) 2.sqroot..pi.c.sup.2 (3.8/a).sup.2
.zeta..sup.3 e-.sup..zeta.2
where
.zeta.=w/k.sub.z V.sub.th
and V.sub.th is the thermal velocity of the plasma electrons. It is of
interest to demonstrate how sensitive the damping rate is to the value of
k because it is such a steep function of .zeta.. Take for example a plasma
with a density of 10.sup.12 electrons/cm.sup.3, an electron temperature of
3 cV and a driving frequency of 8 MHz. The collisional damping rate would
be 0.065 and the Landau damping rate would be 0.6 for k.sub.z =0.25
cm.sup.-1 and 0.0005 for k.sub.z =0.125 cm.sup.-1. It is clear that Landau
damping is the important damping mechanism and that it is very dependent
on the wave number k.sub.z.
Antenna Excitation of Whistler Waves
There are a number of factors important in choosing the right antenna
structure to excite whistler waves for generation of plasmas:
(a) Frequency of excitation
(b) Wave mode
(c) Efficiency of coupling RF power to plasma
(a) Frequency of excitation
The frequency of the waves should be such that it satisfies .OMEGA..sub.c
<w<w.sub.c where .OMEGA..sub.c is the ion cyclotron frequency e B.sub.o
/M.sub.i and w.sub.c is the electron cyclotron frequency e B.sub.o /M.
These waves are low frequency waves that operate far below the electron
cyclotron frequency. Another important consideration for commercial
application is to use an industrial standard frequency such as 13.56 MHz.
The bounds are then determined by the magnetic field strength and the type
of gas used.
(b) Wave mode
It is important to understand the mode structure of the wave electric and
magnetic fields so that an antenna arrangement can best be designed to
efficiently couple the RF power into wave excitation. As discussed above
the two lowest modes are the m=O and m=1 modes. In FIG. 1 the mode
structure of the wave electric field for an m=O mode is shown. The figure
shows the electric field vector 128 on a circular plane 129 at different
positions along the direction of wave travel, z. It can be seen that,
within a wavelength, the electric field can be purely radial 128 or purely
azimuthal 130 with the electric field on one plane 131 being anticlockwise
while on a plane 132 one half-wavelength away it is clockwise. From this
physical picture the best way to excite this mode would be with two loops
separated in distance by a have-wavelength, .sub..pi. /k.sub.z, where
k.sub.z is given from the previously dispersion relation. In FIG. 2 the
mode structure of the wave electric field for an m=1 mode is shown. It can
be seen that there is a natural helical pitch to the electric and magnetic
field vectors as the wave propagates along the z direction and that the
electric field vector 133 is rotating in a right handed sense, i.e., it
rotates clockwise as it travels along B.sub.o which is in the z direction.
From this picture the best way to excite this mode would be with a helical
shaped antenna with the pitch of the helix given by 2.sub..pi. k.sub.z
where k.sub.z is given from the above dispersion relations.
(c) Efficiency of couplinq RF power to plasma
The efficiency of plasma production depends on the coupling of RF energy
into the plasma. As discussed above the important mechanism for damping of
the RF energy is Landau damping. The phase velocity of the whistler wave
is given by .sup.w /k.sub.z, where k.sub.z is given by the dispersion
relation and depends on the plasma density and vacuum magnetic field
strength. Ideally the phase velocity of the wave should be near the
maximum of the ionization potential of the gas we wish to ionize. From the
above dispersion relation for the m=0 mode:
n=B.sub.o k.sub.z (T.sup.2 +k.sub.z.sup.2).sup.1/2
where .alpha.=B.sub.o k.sub.z.sup.2 for T<k.sub.z.
In other words, the higher the value of k.sub.z, the higher the density.
However, the phase velocity of the wave is w/k.sub.z and so increasing
k.sub.z decreases the energy of the electrons that are accelerated by the
wave. If the k.sub.z is too high then the energy of the electrons may fall
below the ionization potential. It is therefore important to control
k.sub.z in order to be able to increase the density and control the
electron temperature.
The first use of whistler waves to generate dense plasmas was described by
Boswell. In this publication the type of antenna used for excitation was
as shown in FIG. 3a. This antenna configuration had been used by
Ovchinnikov and has been previously described. This type of antenna
excites m=1 mode due to the current flowing in the conductors 134 running
parallel to the direction of the magnetic field B.sub.o. The frequency of
excitation was 8 MHz. The density profile of the 10 cm plasma was found to
be quite peaked, particularly at the higher magnetic field strengths
needed for high densities.
In these publications the mechanism for efficient coupling of the RF energy
to the plasma could not be explained. Chen, in an Australian National
University report, explained the mechanism as Landau damping.
Chen, in a paper presented in August 1988, described a system using
whistler waves to generate dense plasmas for use in advanced accelerators.
The type of antenna used in this arrangement was similar to that used by
Boswell in that it excited the m=1 mode and was of a type known as the
Nagoya Type III antenna. This type of antenna is explained in a paper by
Watari (78) and is illustrated in FIG. 3b. The frequency of excitation was
30 MHz.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention utilizes whistler waves to generate plasmas of high
density for use in plasma etching, deposition, and sputtering equipment.
The efficient generation of plasma depends strongly on the antenna
configuration used. The invention includes two new antenna configurations
designed to excite the m=O and m=1 modes and to control the wave number of
the excited wave. This has been shown to be important in maximizing the
density for a given input power and to give control over the electron
temperature or average energy of the electrons in the plasma. We have also
found that the m=O antenna gives a more uniform plasma than previous
designs and that the helical pitch of the m=1 antenna improves the
efficiency as compared to other antennas. For use in many etching and
deposition applications the uniformity of the plasma is important. The
present invention uses a magnetic bucket in conjunction with the plasma
generator to provide a uniform plasma density over large circular area.
The invention uses one or multiple plasma generators in conjunction with a
rectangular magnetic bucket to provide a uniform density over a large
rectangular area for the coating or etching of rectangular substrates. The
invention uses expansion of the magnetic field to allow deposition or
etching over a large area. The present invention uses a linear
configuration to coat or etch large substrates. The invention uses the
plasma generator in conjunction with electrostatic grids as a high
efficiency, high ion current ion source. The invention uses the plasma
generator in conjunction with a sputter target for the sputter deposition
of materials onto substrates.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of electromagnetic wave electric field vectors
for the m=O mode.
FIG. 2 is a perspective view of electromagnetic wave electric field vectors
for the m=1 mode.
FIG. 3a is a perspective view of an antenna arrangement.
FIG. 3b is a schematic diagram depicting RF current flow in an antenna
arrangement.
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram depicting the principle of operation and RF
current flow in an antenna constructed according to the principles of the
present invention for the m=O mode.
FIG. 5 is a perspective view of an antenna constructed according to the
principles of the present invention depicting the principle of operation
and RF current flow in a second configuration used to excite the m=1 mode.
FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of the basic configuration of a plasma
deposition or etching device constructed in accordance with the principles
of the present invention.
FIG. 7 is a graph depicting the relationship of plasma density to magnetic
field strength according to the invention as depicted in FIG. 6 using the
antenna described in FIG. 4.
FIG. 8 is a graph depicting the relationship of plasma density to the
separation of the loops of the antenna described in FIG. 4.
FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram of a second embodiment of the present
invention used for plasma deposition or etching over large circular areas
where uniformity requirements are important.
FIG. 10 is a perspective view of a third embodiment of the present
invention for the deposition or etching over a large rectangular area
where uniformity is important.
FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram of a fourth embodiment of the present
invention for deposition or etching of large area substrates.
FIG. 12 is a side elevation of a fifth embodiment of the present invention
for providing an ion beam.
FIG. 13 is a schematic diagram of a sixth embodiment of the present
invention for sputter deposition.
FIG. 14 is a side elevation of a seventh embodiment of the present
invention for sputter deposition over substrates of large area where
uniformity is important.
FIG. 15 is a side elevation of an eighth embodiment of the present
invention for sputter deposition that uses the plasma generator in
conjunction with a magnetron.
FIG. 16 is a schematic diagram depicting a ninth embodiment of the present
invention for sputter deposition.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The first principle structure of the present invention is the antenna
configuration as shown in FIG. 4. RF current is made to flow through two
circular loops 1 and 2 in such a way that the current in one loop is
passing in a clockwise manner while the current in the other loop is
passing in an anti-clockwise manner. This is achieved by applying an RF
voltage between an inner electrode 3 and an outer electrode 4 which is
grounded and by using the conductors 5 and 6 to connect the two loops. The
distance L between the loops is adjusted to match the conditions in the
plasma as dictated by the dispersion relation,
[w/w.sub.c .multidot.w.sub.p.sup.2 /C.sup.2 k.sub.z.sup.2 ].sup.2
=1+(3.83/k.sub.z a).sup.2.
The RF voltage is applied from an RF power supply 7 through a 50 ohm cable
8 to a matching box 9 which consists of two variable vacuum capacitors 10
and 11 which are tuned so that the loading of the antenna is close to 50
ohms in order to minimize the reflected power.
In FIG. 5 a second arrangement of an antenna is shown. In this arrangement
the RF current path is modified so that the current is made to flow in two
helical shaped paths 12 and 13.
The basic configuration of a plasma deposition or etching apparatus
according to the present invention is shown in FIG. 6. The plasma
generation chamber 14 is cylindrical in shape and is made of a
non-conducting material such as quartz or pyrex. The antenna 15 is mounted
as shown and can be of the type described in FIG. 4 or FIG. 5. An axial
magnetic field is provided by the magnetic field coils 16 and 17. The
plasma is transported by the magnetic field to a separate process chamber
18 and the shape of the plasma can be controlled by varying the current in
the magnetic field coil 19. The substrate 20 to be coated or etched is
mounted on a substrate holder 21 which is electrically isolated. Plasma
that bombards the substrate 20 causes the substrate 20 to reach a negative
self bias of between 10 and 30 V. For some films to be formed it is
advantageous for the film to be bombarded by ions with greater energy than
they would obtain due to the self-bias. In this case it is necessary to
apply RF power from a second RF source 23 through a second matching
circuit 24. The substrate holder 21 is a copper block that is cooled or
heated by a heating/cooling circuit 22. Gas is injected in two places 25
and 26. 25 is a stainless steel tube connected to the plasma generation
chamber 14. 26 is a stainless steel ring with a diameter that is large
compared to the size of the holes 27 that are distributed equally around
the ring. This arrangement is such that a uniform flow of gas is directed
towards the substrate 20. The RF voltage is applied to the antenna 15 by
means of a matching circuit 28 which consists of two vacuum capacitors
10,11 described in FIG. 4. This matching circuit is necessary to maximize
the power that is coupled into the plasma and minimize the power that is
reflected back along the 50 ohm cable 29 to the RF power supply 30.
Using this basic configuration, plasmas of density up to 1.times.10.sup.13
/cm.sup.13 have been produced. In FIG. 7 the plasma density is shown as a
function of magnetic field. In this experiment the antenna as described in
FIG. 4 was used. The mode excited in this case is the m=O mode. The
diameter of the plasma generator was 10 cm and the coil spacing was 15 cm.
The RF was at a frequency of 13.56 MHz and was supplied usinq a commercial
RF power supply through a matching box as shown in FIG. 4. The gas used in
this experiment was argon and the pressure was 1.5 mtorr. Reflected power
was tuned to be less than 1% of the applied power of 2.40 kW.
The importance of the spacing between the loops in order to control the
wave number k has been demonstrated. FIG. 8 depicts the dependence of the
plasma density on the spacing between the loops for a fixed RF power,
magnetic field and pressure. The pressure was 2 mtorr, the magnetic field
was 650 Gauss and the RF power was 2.75 kW. In this example there is an
optimum spacing of the loops at approximately 125 mm.
FIG. 9 shows an arrangement where high uniformity over a large area is
required. The plasma generation chamber 31 is cylindrical in shape and is
made of a non-conducting material such as quartz or pyrex. The antenna 32
is mounted as shown and can be of the type described in FIG. 4 or FIG. 5.
An axial magnetic field is provided by the magnetic field coils 33 and 34.
The plasma is transported by the magnetic field to the magnetic bucket
chamber 35.
In a paper by Limpaecher and Mackenzie (R. Limpaecher and K.R. Mackenzie,
Rev. Sci. Instrum. Vol. 44,726 (1973) is the disclosure that using magnets
in a multicusp arrangement can provide very uniform plasma parameters in a
central zone of the volume enclosed by the magnets. The arrangement of the
magnets around the circumference of a cylinder is a common arrangement
used for ion sources and is referred to as a magnetic bucket. It is
important to design the magnetic field in such a way that there is a good
match between the axial field provided by the coil 34 and the field in the
bucket. The plasma from the generator diffuses along the magnetic field
lines and expands to fill the bucket. The magnetic bucket chamber 35 is
made of stainless steel and can be of, for example, circular or
rectangular cross-section. In either case the dimensions of the bucket are
such that it is larger than the diameter of the plasma generator. The
magnetic field within the bucket is provided by permanent magnets 36
arranged with their poles perpendicular to the surface of the bucket
chamber and with alternating north N and south S poles. With this
arrangement, the magnetic field lines 37 follow a multicusp pattern and
the field in the central zone is very low. The magnetic field pattern
provided by the magnets is shown in view A--A. The substrate 38 to be
coated or etched is mounted on a substrate holder 39. The substrate holder
is a copper block that is cooled or heated by a heating/cooling circuit
40. Gas is injected in two places 41 and 42. 43 is a stainless steel tube
connected to the plasma generation chamber 31. A stainless steel ring 44
has a diameter that is large compared to the size of the holes 45 that are
distributed equally around the ring 44. This arrangement is such that a
uniform flow of gas is directed towards the substrate 38. The RF voltage
is applied to the antenna 32 means of a matching circuit 46 which consists
of two vacuum capacitors 10,11 as described in FIG. 4. This matching
circuit is necessary to maximize the power that is coupled into the plasma
and to minimize the power that is reflected back along the 50 ohm cable 47
to the RF power supply 48.
FIG. 10 shows an arrangement where high uniformity over large rectangular
shaped areas is required such as needed in the coating of displays. The
plasma generator is of the type described above and in this arrangement
multiple generators may be used depending on the size of plasma needed. In
FIG. 10 three plasma generators 49, 50 and 51 are shown. Each plasma
generation chamber is cylindrical in shape and made of non-conducting
material such as quartz or pyrex. The antennae 52,53 and 54 used on each
generator is of the type described in FIG. 4 or FIG. 5. An axial magnetic
field is provided by the magnetic field coils 55,56, 57, 58, 59, and 60.
The plasma is transported by the magnetic field to the rectangular
magnetic bucket chamber 61. The plasma diffuses along the field lines and
expands to fill the bucket. The magnetic field within the bucket chamber
61 is provided by permanent magnets 62 arranged with their poles
perpendicular to the surface of the bucket chamber and with alternating N
and S poles. The magnetic field pattern provided by the magnets is shown
in view A--A. The substrate 63 to be coated | | |