|
|
|
| United States Patent | 4994762 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/4994762.html |
| Inventor(s) | Tay; Wan F. (Coral Springs, FL) |
| Abstract | An improved mixed down synthesizer scheme 10 having a first phase locked
loop 12 and a second phase locked loop 14 provides a first frequency and a
second frequency respectively. The first phase locked loop 12 has at least
a first programmably tunable filter 30 and a mixer 28. The second phase
locked loop 14 has an output received by the mixer 28 in the first phase
locked loop 12. A controlling means (18 and 20) controls the first and
second frequencies and tunes the first programmably tunable filter 30. The
first and the second phase locked loops 12 and 14 are programmed to
maintain a constant frequency ratio between the first and second
frequencies in order to maintain a minimum frequency offset from the
mixed-in spurious products. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing from US Patent 4994762 |
|
|
Multiloop synthesizer with optimal spurious performance |
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
February 19, 1991 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
November 20, 1989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
|
|
|
| Market Size |
|
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market
sector:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Market Share |
|
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Reasonable Royalty |
|
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
|
| | |
| |
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
|
| Market Size | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Market Share | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Reasonable Royalty | N/A | [No votes] |
| | N/A | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Technical Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed is:
1. A mixed down synthesizer scheme, comprising:
a first phase locked loop, providing a first frequency and having at least
a first programmably turnable filter and a mixer;
a second phase locked loop, providing a second frequency having an output
received by said mixer in the first phase locked loop; and
a controlling means for controlling said first and second frequencies and
for tuning said first programmably tunable filter.
2. The mixed down synthesizer scheme of claim 1, wherein the first and
second phase locked loops receive a reference signal from at least one
reference oscillator.
3. The mixed down synthesizer scheme of claim 1, wherein a second
programmably tunable filter is coupled to the output of said mixer, said
second programmably tunable filter being tuned by said controlling means.
4. The mixed down synthesizer scheme of claim 1, wherein said controlling
means comprises a microprocessor and at least one digital-to-analog
convertor.
5. The mixed down synthesizer scheme of claim 1, wherein each of said first
and second phase locked loops has at least a prescaler coupled to a phase
detector.
6. The mixed down synthesizer scheme of claim 5, wherein each of said first
and second phase locked loops further comprises a loop filter.
7. The mixed down synthesizer scheme of claim 5, wherein each of said first
and second phase locked loops further comprises a voltage controlled
oscillator.
8. The mixed down synthesizer scheme of claim 5, wherein said controlling
means controls each prescaler in the first and second phase locked loops.
9. The mixed down synthesizer scheme of claim 3, wherein a buffer is
coupled to the output of the second tunable filter.
10. A mixed down synthesizer scheme, comprising:
a first phase locked loop, providing a first frequency and having at least
a first programmably tunable filter and a mixer; and
a second phase locked loop, providing a second frequency having an output
received by said mixer in the first phase lock loop;
a controlling means for controlling said first and second frequencies and
for tuning said first programmably tunable filter;
a reference oscillator coupled to each of said first and second phase
locked loops for providing a reference signal to each phase locked loop.
11. The mixed down synthesizer scheme of claim 10, wherein the first and
second phase locked loops comprise a first and a second phase detector
respectively, each receiving a reference signal from the reference
oscillator and a prescaled signal from a first and a second prescaler
respectively for providing a first and a second phase detected signal.
12. The mixed down synthesizer scheme of claim 11, wherein said first and
second phase locked loops comprise a first and a second loop filter
respectively for receiving the first and the second phase detected signal
respectively and for providing a first and a second filtered voltage
signal.
13. The mixed down synthesizer scheme of claim 12, wherein said first and
second phase locked loops comprise a first and a second voltage controlled
oscillator respectively for receiving said first and said second filtered
voltage signal respectively and providing a first and a second injection
signal to the mixer.
14. The mixed down synthesizer scheme of claim 13, wherein said mixer,
having a reference injection port, receives the first and the second
injection signals from the first and the second voltage controlled
oscillators to provide a desired signal to an output stage and to the
first programmably tunable filter.
15. The mixed down synthesizer scheme of claim 14, wherein said output
stage comprises a second programmably tunable filter and a buffer.
16. The mixed down synthesizer scheme of claim 11, wherein said controlling
means comprises a microprocessor and said first programmably tunable
filter, comprises a programmably tunable varactor filter.
17. A method to programmably obtain an optimal mixing frequency ratio for
optimal spurious performance, comprising the steps of:
(a) providing a first frequency with a first phase locked loop;
(b) providing a second frequency with a second phase locked loop;
(c) mixing said first and second said frequencies to provide a desired
frequency along with spurious products;
(d) programming said first and said second phase locked loops such that the
ratio between the first and second frequencies are within an optimum
spurious range;
(e) programming at least one tunable filter to filter any mixed spurious
products.
18. The method of claim 17, wherein the ratio of step (d) is within the
range between 0.83 and 0.9.
19. The method of claim 17, wherein programming the first and the second
phase locked loops further comprises maintaining a substantially constant
frequency ratio between the first and second frequencies in order to
maintain a minimum frequency offset from the mixed-in spurious products.
20. A mixed down synthesizer scheme, comprising:
a first phase locked loop having a mixer, providing a first frequency;
a second phase locked loop, providing a second frequency having an output
received by said mixer in the first phase locked loop;
a controlling means for controlling said first and second frequencies and
for tuning at least a first programmably tunable filter. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates generally to phase locked loops, and more
specifically to phase locked loops with optimal spurious performance.
BACKGROUND
The tuning bandwidth of a conventional single loop analog synthesizer often
has a narrow tuning bandwidth (below 20% bandwidth), due to limitations in
the tuning range of the varactor diode. More particularly applicable to
low band and mid band ranges, if a high resonator Q is desired for good
sideband noise performance, then a large and bulky resonating coil is
usually required. The typical techniques used to diminish these problems
involves the use of the divide down synthesis method or the mix down
synthesis method.
Use of the divide down synthesis method generally reduces the size of the
coil when a higher frequency voltage controlled oscillator (VCO) is used,
but fails to provide an adequate tuning range due to the limits of the
divider ratio. The conventional mix down method eliminates the problems
with coil size and limits in tuning range, but adds the additional problem
of inherent in-band spurious response signals due to Able-Baker mixing
products. The Able-Baker spurious response signals cannot be filtered out
due to their proximity to the desired signal over a wide frequency band.
Therefore, a need for a mix down synthesizer method that reduces the
in-band spurious response signal problems is required.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide an
improved mixed down synthesizer scheme having a first phase locked loop
and a second phase locked loop providing a first frequency and a second
frequency respectively. The first phase locked loop has at least a first
programmably tunable filter and a mixer. The second phase locked loop has
an output received by the mixer in the first phase locked loop. A
controlling means controls the first and second frequencies and tunes the
first programmably tunable filter.
The first and the second phase locked loops are programmed to maintain a
narrow frequency ratio range between the first and second frequencies in
order to maintain a minimum frequency offset of the spurious products from
the desired frequency.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a dual phase locked loop in accordance
with the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring to FIG. 1, there is shown a mixed down synthesizer scheme 10 in
accordance with the present invention. As illustrated, the dual looped
mixed down synthesizer scheme 10 has a single frequency source, preferably
a reference oscillator 16 that provides a reference signal to a first loop
12 and a second loop 14, although a separate frequency source may
optionally be provided for each loop. The first loop 12 and the second
loop 14 provide a first frequency and a second frequency respectively. The
first loop 12 has a conventional phase detector 22 that receives the
reference signal and a first prescaled signal from a prescaler
(programmable divider) 32, and provides a phase detected signal. The phase
detected signal is applied as an input into a loop filter 24. The loop
filter 24 provides a filtered voltage signal and is applied as a
controlling voltage input to a voltage controlled oscillator 26 for
developing an output useful as an injection signal input F.sub.x to a
mixer 28. After the injection signal from the VCO 26 is mixed in the mixer
28, the output of the mixer 28, a desired signal F.sub.d, is applied to a
first programmable tunable filter, preferably a varactor tuned filter 30
within the first loop 12. The output of the varactor tuned filter 30 is
applied to the prescaler 32, preferably a dual modulus prescaler. Note
that the desired signal F.sub.d from the mixer 28 can be split to provide
the desired signal F.sub.d to the filter 42 in the output stage of the
mixed down synthesizer scheme 10.
The mixer 28 also receives an injection signal F.sub.r from a VCO 34 in the
second loop 14. The mixer 28 mixes the injection signals F.sub.x and
F.sub.r from the VCOs 28 and 34 to provide the desired signal F.sub.d to
varactor tuned filter 30 and, optionally, to another varactor tuned filter
42 in the output stage of the mixed down synthesizer scheme.
The second loop 14 has a phase detector 38 that receives the reference
signal from the reference oscillator 16 and a prescaled signal from a
prescaler 40 and provides a phase detected signal. The phase detected
signal is applied as an input to a loop filter 36. The loop filter 36
provides a filtered voltage signal and is applied as a controlling voltage
input to a voltage controlled oscillator 34. The output or the injection
signal from the VCO 34 is then applied to the prescaler 40, preferably
another dual modulus prescaler which provides a second prescaled signal.
The second prescaled signal is then fed back to the phase detector 38. The
output or injection signal from the VCO 34 is also applied to the
reference injection port of the mixer 28. The second loop 14 acts as a
programmable frequency reference source for the mixer 28. The output
F.sub.d from the mixer 28 after mixing a signal injection signal F.sub.r
from (the VCO 34 in) the second loop 14 with the injection signal F.sub.x
from (the VCO 26 in) the first loop 12 provides a desired signal. The
output of the mixer 28, the desired signal, is applied to the programmable
tunable filter 42 in the output stage of the mixed down synthesizer scheme
10. The output stage of the mixed down synthesizer 10 preferably has at
least one buffer 44 for buffering the output signal from the varactor
tuned filter 42.
Varactor tuned filters 30 and 42 are both programmably tuned by a processor
18, preferably a MC68HC11 microcontroller manufactured by Motorola.
Processor 18 also can control the divisors of the prescalers 32 and 40.
The filters 30 and 42 are controlled by the processor 18 via a
digital-to-analog convertor 20. The filters 30 and 42 are programmably
tuned so that an almost constant frequency ratio between the first
frequency and second frequency is maintained in order to maintain a
minimum frequency offset from mixed-in spurious product or the spurious
frequencies. The constant frequency ratio is dependent on the operating
frequency and the desired spurious performance. Typically, there are
numerous ratio ranges providing good spurious performance, but the range
between 0.83 and 0.9 is preferred. By keeping the spurious frequencies at
a minimum offset frequency from the desired signal's frequency, a constant
bandwidth filter can be designed to easily filter out Able-Baker type and
other in-band spurious responses. This provides an improved in-band
spurious response over a wide range of frequencies.
In an alternative embodiment (not shown), all programmably tunable filters
(42 and 30) can be located in the output stage, preferably receiving the
desired signal from the mixer 28. A low pass filter (not shown) can
replace the filter 30 in loop 12. When a low pass filter is used, a
smaller bandwidth is obtained. Again, the filters (42 and 30) can be
controlled by a microprocessor 18 via a D-to-A convertor. The outputs from
the filters (42 and 30) are preferably buffered.
* * * * *
|
|
|
|
|
Description  |
|
|
|
|
|