WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Waste water treatment method    
United States Patent4999116   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/4999116.html
Inventor(s)Bowers; Gregory S. (Greer, SC)
AbstractWaste water treatment for the removal of heavy metals is optimized by continuously removing and filtering a sample flow of treated waste water subject to pH level control to determine the presence of remaining metals in solution to be precipitated. Filtering of the sample removes metals precipitated by pH level control. Optimized pH level control can cause precipitation of most non-chelated and/or non-complexed metals, so that controlled feeding of a precipitating agent to the treated waste water is effectively determined by only those metals remaining in solution, which are typically either chelated and/or complexed heavy metals. The filtered sample is injected with a diluted solution of the precipitating agent, and then a turbidity meter is used to determine the degree of turbidity of the injected clear sample. The resulting degree of turbidity corresponds to the level of precipitation caused by injection of the diluted precipitating agent. The precipitation level is in turn in direct correspondence with the level of remaining metals in solution. Differentiation between types of metals for control of feeding of the precipitating agent to the waste water permits optimized use of the precipitating agent, and minimized sludge production accompanying use of the precipitating agent.
   














 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History
Drawing from US Patent 4999116
Waste water treatment method - US Patent 4999116 Drawing
Waste water treatment method
Inventor     Bowers; Gregory S. (Greer, SC)
Owner/Assignee     Southern Water Treatment Company, Inc. (Easley, SC)
Patent assignment
All assignments
Publication Date     March 12, 1991
Application Number     07/450,411
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     January 8, 1990
US Classification     210/709 210/724 210/726 210/745 210/764 210/912 210/928
Int'l Classification     C02F 001/62
Examiner     Wyse; Tom
Assistant Examiner    
Attorney/Law Firm     Dority & Manning
Address
Parent Case     This is a division of application Ser. No. 205,313, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,923,599, filed June 10, 1988.
Priority Data    
USPTO Field of Search     210/709 210/711 210/720 210/724 210/725 210/726 210/727 210/728 210/729 210/745 210/746 210/757 210/764 210/765 210/743 210/725 210/726 210/727 210/728 210/729 210/928 210/96.1
Patent Tags     waste water treatment
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
3770423



[0 after 0 votes]
1943684



[0 after 0 votes]
3262878



[0 after 0 votes]
3393149



[0 after 0 votes]
3605775



[0 after 0 votes]
3725263



[0 after 0 votes]
4943377
Legare, III
210/709
Jul,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4855061
Martin
210/709
Aug,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4731182
High
210/374
Mar,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4724084
Pahmeier
210/709
Feb,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4282093
Haga
210/90
Aug,1981

[0 after 0 votes]
4170553
Lang
210/709
Oct,1979

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


What is claimed is:

1. A method of waste water treatment, comprising:

conducting pH treatment of a controlled body of waste water for substantially precipitating non-chelated and non-complexed metals therefrom;

sampling such pH-treated waste water, and substantially removing solid precipitated metals therefrom to provide a clear sample;

testing such clear sample for the presence of any remaining metals in solution therein; and

feeding a given precipitating agent to the controlled body of waste water in response to the presence of such remaining metals so as to substantially precipitate same, whereby both pH-precipitated and non-pH-precipitated metals are substantially precipitated from such body of waste water for removal therefrom, with minimized feeding of said precipitating agent.

2. A method as in claim 1, wherein said sampling, removing, and testing are generally conducted continuously, while said feeding is conducted selectively for feeding the given precipitating agent to the controlled body of waste water responsive to the presence of remaining metals in solution.

3. A method as in claim 1, wherein said testing includes analyzing said clear sample with a continuous metal analyzer means, operative for outputing a feedback signal indicative of the presence of any remaining metals in solution, which feedback signal in turn actuates feed control means, provided as part of said feeding, for feeding said precipitating agent to the waste water.

4. A method as in claim 1, wherein:

said removing includes passing the sampled waste water through filter means for providing said clear sample; and

said testing includes continuously injecting an indicator solution to the clear sample, which solution renders such sample turbid to a degree which is in proportion to the presence of metals in solution in such sample; and further includes thereafter monitoring the degree of the turbidity of such sample.

5. A method as in claim 4, wherein:

said indicator solution comprises a diluted strength of said given precipitating agent; and

said non-pH-precipitated metals comprise at least one of heavy metals which are chelated and heavy metals which are complexed.

6. A method as in claim 4, further comprising:

periodically interrupting said sampling and removing operations, and instead backwashing said filter means so as to prevent clogging of same; and

recirculating said clear sample to the controlled body of waste water after testing of such sample; and

wherein said conducting of pH treatment includes adequately controlling the pH of such body of waste water so as to substantially precipitate therefrom non-chelated and non-complexed metals; whereby

said method permits relatively continuous automatic monitoring and removal of heavy metals from solution in such waste water while minimizing sludge generation accompanying heavy metal precipitation, by substantially preventing overfeeding of said precipitating agent beyond an efficacious amount thereof for precipitating chelated and complexed heavy metals from such body of waste water.

7. A method as in claim 1, wherein:

said testing further includes determining the degree to which any remaining metals in solution are present; and

said feeding is actuated only whenever such determined degree of the presence of remaining metals in solution exceeds a predetermined level.

8. A method of as in claim 1, wherein:

said testing further includes determining the degree to which any remaining metals in solution are present; and

actuation of said precipitating agent feeding is modulated proportionately to such determined degree of the presence of remaining metals in solution.

9. A process of removing heavy metals from waste water, said process including the steps of:

continuously sampling the waste water and removing from such sampling already precipitated metals so as to provide a clear sample;

injecting a given precipitating agent into such clear sample so as to render same turbid to a degree determined by the reactionary precipitation of metals formerly remaining in solution in such clear sample;

detecting the degree of turbidity of such injected sample, so as to ascertain a proportional corresponding degree to which metals remain in solution in the waste water; and

providing a regulated flow of said given precipitating agent to the waste water in correspondence with the ascertained degree to which metals remain in solution in such waste water, whereby such regulated flow enables precipitation of heavy metals from the waste water substantially without overfeed of the precipitating agent, which minimizes sludge production accompanying use of such agent.

10. A process as in claim 9, wherein:

said sampling and removing steps include establishing a sample flow from the waste water through filter means for filtering precipitants therefrom larger than a predetermined size;

said injecting step includes injecting a relatively diluted strength of said given precipitating agent into said sample flow; and

said process further includes the step of returning said sample flow to the waste water, after performance of said injecting and detecting steps thereon.

11. A process as in claim 10, wherein:

the waste water from which said sample flow is established also undergoes pH-treatment for substantially precipitating non-chelated and non-complexed metals therefrom, which are removed during said removing step; and

said process further includes the step of periodically backwashing said filter means with reverse flow therethrough so as to prevent clogging thereof with such pH-treatment precipitated non-chelated and non-complexed metals, whereby relatively continuous operation of said process is afforded.

12. A process as in claim 9, wherein said providing step includes set-point control of said regulated flow, so as to permit flow of said given precipitating agent only whenever the degree of turbidity is detected as being above a predetermined set-point.

13. A process as in claim 9, wherein said providing step includes modulated control of said regulated flow, so as to provide flow of said given precipitating agent in proportion with the detected degree of turbidity.

14. A waste water treatment process for reducing metals in solution with such waste water to a predetermined level, said process including:

providing multiple treatment stages for waste water including at least one stage constituting a main treatment tank having inflow thereto and outflow therefrom relative other treatment stages in the process;

controlling the pH level in said main treatment tank so as to precipitate those metals therefrom amenable to pH-induced precipitation at the controlled level of such pH;

continuously monitoring said main treatment tank for remaining non-precipitated metals; and

based on such monitoring, selectively administering a given precipitating agent to said main treatment tank for precipitating such remaining metals to a degree adequate to reduce metals in solution with such waste water to said predetermined level; wherein

said monitoring and administering steps include:

establishing a continuous sample flow from said main treatment tank,

filtering said continuous sample flow to remove precipitated metals therefrom so as to provide a relatively clear continuous sample flow,

continuously injecting a relatively diluted amount of said given precipitating agent into said relatively clear continuous sample flow at an injection point in such flow,

detecting the turbidity of such flow at a point downstream from said injection point, the degree of such turbidity varying in proportion with the degree to which additional metals are precipitated by said injecting of the diluted given precipitating agent, and

actuating said administering of such given precipitating agent to the main treatment tank responsive to the degree of detected turbidity, whereby such administering of the precipitating agent is in accordance with a monitored need for additional precipitation measures other than said pH level control, which minimizes sludge production inherently generated by use of such precipitating agent.

15. A process as in claim 14, wherein:

said continuous sample flow from said main treatment tank is established at a relatively low flow rate; and

said process further includes a preliminary equalization stage situated upstream from said main treatment tank and providing said inflow thereto; and

said process further includes treatment stages situated downstream from said main treatment tank and receiving said outflow therefrom, such downstream stages consecutively including coagulation, flocculation, and clarification stages.

16. A process as in claim 14, wherein:

said predetermined level of metals in solution with the waste water is generally in a range of from about zero to about 5 parts per million;

said continuous sample flow from said main treatment tank has a flow rate generally within a range of from about 1 to about 20 gallons per minute;

said filtering of said continuous sample flow includes filtering with membranes having a minimum particle trapping size generally in a range of from about 0.2 microns to about 5 microns;

said pH-level control includes controlling such pH level in said main treatment tank to generally within a range of from about 4 to about 12; and

said metals amenable to pH-induced precipitation are generally non-heavy metals, while said remaining non-precipitated metals are generally heavy metals which are chelated and/or complexed.

17. A process as in claim 16, wherein said given precipitating agent comprises one of sodium dimethyldithiocarbamate and sodium borohydride.

18. A process as in claim 14, wherein:

said pH-level control includes maintaining the level of said pH in said main treatment tank generally below 4;

preliminary treatment stages of said process upstream from said main treatment tank include an equalization stage followed by a flocculation stage; and

said given precipitating agent comprises parasulfate.

19. A process as in claim 14, wherein:

said filtering step includes providing a pair of tubular filters, interconnected with controllable valves for directed flow therethrough in a selected longitudinal direction; and

said waste water treatment process further includes the step of controlling said valves so as to intermittently reverse the longitudinal flow direction within said filters, and/or admit reverse flow direction water thereto from a clean external source, for backwashing same, whereby substantially continuous monitoring and administering may take place.

20. A process as in claim 14, wherein said administering actuating is based on set point control so that only degrees of detected turbidity above a predetermined set point actuate administering of said given precipitating agent to the main treatment tank.

21. A process as in claim 14, wherein said actuating step includes modulated administering of said given precipitating agent to the main treatment tank proportionately responsive to the degree of detected turbidity, for proportionately administering said precipitating agent in accordance with said monitored need therefor.

22. A method of controlling the level of a consumable agent present in a given generally aqueous medium having solids in solution therein, such agent being consumed while such given medium is involved in a continuous process, said method including the steps of:

establishing a sample flow from the given medium;

filtering the sample flow established from said given medium, for substantially removing precipitated solids therefrom to provide a clear sample flow;

providing a given indicator solution which reacts in said sample flow so as to create precipitation therefrom of any solids remaining in solution in said given medium;

injecting said given indicator solution into the clear sample flow;

sensing the degree of turbidity of such sample flow downstream from such injecting, which degree of turbidity is in direct proportion with the degree of precipitation brought on by injecting of such given indicator solution into such flow; and

replenishing said consumable agent in said given medium in proportion to the sensed degree of turbidity of such sample flow, whereby the level of such agent in said given medium can be monitored and regulated as desired relative the continuous process in which said given medium is involved.

23. A method as in claim 22, wherein:

said given medium comprises waste water to be treated, and said solids comprise metals in solution therewith to be removed therefrom to about a predetermined level remaining in solution as such treatment of said waste water;

said consumable agent comprises a predetermined precipitating agent, with consumption thereof occurring during precipitation from said waste water of metals in solution therewith; and

said indicator solution comprises a relatively diluted strength of said predetermined precipitating agent.

24. A method as in claim 23, wherein:

said metals in solution include heavy metals and non-heavy metals;

said continuous process includes substantial pH-induced precipitation of such non-heavy metals from said waste water; and

said precipitating agent comprises sodium dimethyldithiocarbamate, effective for precipitating chelated and complexed metals from said waste water not otherwise precipitated therefrom by such pH-inducement.

25. A method as in claim 22, wherein:

said given medium comprises an aqueous suspension for use in manufacturing a product; and

said consumable agent comprises a biocide, with consumption thereof occurring as such biocide encounters and kills organic growth in said aqueous suspension.

26. A method as in claim 25, wherein:

said suspension comprises a pulp suspension involved in a continuous papermaking process;

said biocide comprises sodium dimethyldithiocarbarmate; and

said indicator solution comprises a heavy metal compound in solution.

27. A method as in claim 25, wherein:

said suspension comprises a sugar-based suspension in a continuous sugar-making process;

said biocide comprises sodium dimethyldithiocarbarmate; and

said indicator solution comprises a heavy metal compound in solution.
 Description Submit all comments and votes
 


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention concerns in general improved method and apparatus for waste water treatment, and in particular concerns the treatment of waste water containing heavy metals.

Industrial waste waters commonly include a variety of contaminants which require treatment (i.e. removal) even before the waste water can be discharged from the plant site. The nature of the waste water contaminants is in large part dependent on the commercial processes practiced in the plant. Accordingly, there is great variety in the nature of waste water contaminant problems. Moreover, the matrix (i.e., makeup) of waste water even at a given commercial site will usually vary, sometimes dramatically, with changes in production or the like.

Particular industries, for example such as those relating to metal plating, metal finishing, or circuit board manufacturing activities, generate waste water with heavy metals (e.g., copper, nickel, etc.) and other metals in solution with such waste water. The commercial activities themselves, may inherently generate heavy metals which are chelated and/or complexed for purposes of the commercial activity (e.g., metal plating) itself. Chelating and/or complexing tends to cause such metals to remain in solution, and thus require special attention for their removal.

During the typical course of plant activity, heavy metal concentration in the waste water is highly variable. While concentration variations can in general be expected, monitoring of and reacting to specific variations is problematic. Concentrations of heavy metals may typically vary from a few parts per million to several hundred parts per million, even in a very short time, such as a matter of minutes.

Not only do concentration levels vary drastically, but extreme variations can be experienced with respect to the matrix (both in identity and nature, e.g., chelated versus non-chelated) of heavy metals present.

In general, it is known to add (i.e., feed) various precipitating agents to waste water to precipitate such heavy metals for their removal from the water. The amount of such precipitating agents required (i.e. consumed) in the course of precipitating such heavy metals of course depends on the degree of presence of such heavy metals in solution with the waste water. Since effective real time monitoring of heavy metal concentration levels has heretofore generally proven difficult, such treatment chemical feeding (i.e. the feed rate of precipitating agents) is typically set at a compromise level, such as for precipitating the maximum expected concentration of heavy metals. Such a compromise setting creates an excess amount of sludge, which sludge may often be classified as a hazardous waste. Moreover, since the cost of the treatment chemicals is not insignificant, wasteful overfeeding thereof is costly.

Operators have been known to attempt periodic checks to manually detect the level of metals entering the waste water (i.e., assess the expected concentrations), and adjust the chemical feed rate accordingly. However, such a manual adjustment merely alters the set feed rate in accordance with periodic reassessments of the anticipated maximum concentration, and does nothing to eliminate excess sludge production and excessive and costly chemical usage caused by differences between actual concentration levels and the anticipated maximums thereof. Moreover, short term spikes can still occur, meaning that inadequately treated waste water can be nonetheless discharged. Such occurrences are particularly problematic where applicable laws regulate the permissable discharge concentration levels, such as to certain fractional parts per million or certain parts per million.

In some industrial settings, anticipation of heavy metal concentrations in the waste water may be relatively "less predictable". For example, a totally unexpected occurrence of heavy metals in the waste water can go unchecked, thereby causing the plant to exceed permissible discharge levels. For example, maintenance personnel might empty mop buckets or the like containing chelated heavy metals picked up from the floor of the facility, which could cause a heavy metal concentration spike in the waste water at a time whenever commercial activity in the plant is nil, and precipitating agent feed pumps may be switched off. The plant is nonetheless responsible for its waste water discharge, though no effective continuous monitoring systems for preventing such undesirable discharges may be available.

It is generally known that certain metals in solution in waste water may be precipitated therefrom by controlling the pH level of the waste water. For example, non-chelated and non-complexed metals in particular may be in various degrees precipitated in such manner. Automatic controllers are generally available which function to probe the waste water for its pH level, and automatically pump treatment chemicals accordingly to the waste water so as to adjust its pH level within an established deviation from a pre-selected setpoint. One example of such a controller is the Model 5 proportional pH pump controller, made by Chem-Tech International, Inc., of 92 Bolt Street, Lowell, Mass., 01853. While such a controller may be effective for metals which may be precipitated through such pH inducement, heavy metals which are chelated and/or complexed generally will not be precipitated with such pH level control. Thus, the monitoring and treatment problems noted above persist, and may be compounded where a changing mix of chelated and non-chelated metals is presented for treatment.

Another aspect of waste water treatment problems where both such types of metals are in solution (i.e., which can and can not be practically precipitated through pH inducement) is that use of a precipitating agent can precipitate both such types of metals. However, unnecessary sludge production is caused by precipitating metals in such a manner which could have otherwise been precipitated through pH level control (as generally discussed above). Again, the amount of precipitating agent consumption is also a factor.

In addition to the availability of known pH level control generally outlined above, at least one other generally known method, involving a so-called oxidation reduction potential probe, attempts to address precipitating agent usage. Such a probe is typically used to detect the presence of excess (i.e. un-consumed) precipitating agent at a phase of a waste water treatment program after all the metal is removed. One particular limitation of such a system is that it cannot distinguish between, for example, chelated and non-chelated metals, and must therefore feed precipitating agent until there is an excess of such agent present in the water. Feed control feedback also is derived from detected excess agent, not from information relative remaining metal in solution to be precipitated. Thus, there is no effective prevention of excess sludge generation or wasteful chemical usage.

Another limitation of a waste treatment system utilizing an oxidation reduction potential (ORP) probe is that the probe operation involves an electrical measurement which is affected by changes in the pH level of the waste water, the amount of total dissolved solids therein, and the amount of chelated metal in the waste water. Thus, an ORP probe system is inherently ineffective for use in providing close control of the feeding of chemical treatment solutions into waste water treatment systems.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention addresses such drawbacks and shortcomings, and others, of prior waste water treatment techniques. Accordingly, it is a general object of the present invention to provide improved waste water treatment methods, and apparatus for practicing same. It is a more particular object to provide such improved waste water treatments relating to the removal of heavy metals.

It is a more general object to provide improved heavy metal waste water treatment which effectively minimizes sludge production and treatment chemical consumption.

In providing such improved method and apparatus, it is yet a further object of this invention to provide same with the ability to change a chemical treatment solution feed rate so as to automatically match varying demands of the waste water chemistry, thereby resulting in such reduced sludge generation and lower treatment chemical consumption. In providing such an automatically operative system, it is an object to provide a system which can be practically operated substantially continuously, and so as to greatly reduce a plant operators time needed to manage and maintain same.

It is another more general object of the present invention to provide for improved waste water treatment which permits continuous and automatic achievement of a predetermined setpoint of heavy metal concentration in solution (such as legislatively mandated levels in parts per million or fractions thereof). It is a more particular object to provide such a system which is effective in achieving such objects despite even wide variations in the heavy metal concentrations, such as may occur from entirely unanticipated dumps of relatively high heavy metal concentrations into the waste water flow.

It is another more particular object of the present invention to provide for improved heavy metal waste water treatment which is compatible for use with pH level control systems, so as to in combination therewith limit usage of the precipitating agent and limit the overall generation of sludge, particularly sludge designated as hazardous waste.

In providing such improved waste water treatment methods and apparatus, it is an object to provide for continuous practice thereof in conjunction with an otherwise continuously operating waste water treatment system, such as a system having a plurality of consecutive treatment stages.

It is yet another object of the present invention to provide such an improved waste water treatment system, which is effective for controling the consumption of a wide variety of available precipitating agents.

In connection with consumption monitoring and limiting, it is another object to provide a controller for precipitating agent feeding, even where such agent is used for an alternative commercial purpose, such as for a biocide (encountering and killing microbiological activity, or the like) for treating a given aqueous suspension. It is a particular object to provide such a controller effective for controlling the level of such a consumable agent used as a biocide in connection with a generally aqueous papermaking suspension or sugar-making suspension. Alternatively, an object is to utilize the present invention in controlling the level of a consumable biocide in cooling water of a cooling water tower.

It is yet another general object of the present invention to provide for improved waste water treatment which effectively distinguishes between metals in solution which are chelated and/or complexed, and those which are non-chelated and/or non-complexed, so as to enable efficient utilization of a precipitating agent for the chelated and/or complexed metals. It is a further object to provide for controlled feeding of such precipitating agent to the waste water to be treated, instead of merely allowing feeding of such precipitating agent at a calculated rate based on anticipated maximum heavy metal concentrations.

The foregoing objects and advantages, and others, of the present invention may be embodied in a variety of methods, apparatus, and devices in accordance with the present invention. Alternative embodiments of the present invention may include various combinations of features in accordance with this invention, which features are discussed in greater detail below. Moreover, such embodiments may in the alternative be embodied as either practice of a method including such features as various steps or the like of such method, or embodied as an apparatus, a device, system or the like including components or means in correspondence with such combination of features.

Practiced as either a method or apparatus, one exemplary embodiment of the present invention includes the combination of present features for waste water treatment, comprising: conducting pH treatment of a controlled body of waste water for substantially precipitating non-chelated and non-complexed metals therefrom; sampling such pH-treated waste water, and substantially removing solid precipitated metals therefrom to provide a clear sample; testing such clear sample for the presence of any remaining metals in solution therein; and feeding a given precipitating agent to the controlled body of waste water in response to the presence of such remaining metals so as to substantially precipitate same. Both pH-precipitated and non-pH-precipitated metals are substantially precipitated from the body of waste water for removal therefrom, with minimized feeding of said precipitating agent.

Other exemplary embodiments of this invention (concerning both process and apparatus) are directed to the combined features of: continuously sampling waste water and removing from such sampling already precipitated metals so as to provide a clear sample; injecting a given precipitating agent into such clear sample so as to render same turbid to a degree determined by the reactionary precipitation of metals formerly remaining in solution in such clear sample; detecting the degree of turbidity of such injected sample, so as to ascertain a proportional corresponding degree to which metals remain in solution in the waste water; and providing a regulated flow of the given precipitating agent to the waste water in correspondence with the ascertained degree to which metals remain in solution in such waste water. Such regulated flow enables precipitation of heavy metals from the waste water substantially without over-feed of the precipitating agent, which minimizes sludge production accompanying use of such agent.

Still another exemplary embodiment of this invention is directed to a waste water treatment process for (or system for) reducing metals in solution with such waste water to a predetermined level, such process including (or such system including means for): providing multiple treatment stages for waste water including at least one stage constituting a main treatment tank having inflow thereto and outflow therefrom relative other treatment stages in the process; (pH level control means for) controlling the pH level in said main treatment tank so as to precipitate those metals therefrom amenable to pH-induced precipitation at the controlled level of such pH; (testing means for) continuously monitoring the main treatment tank for remaining non-precipitated metals; and based on such monitoring, (control means for) selectively administering a given precipitating agent to the main treatment tank for precipitating such remaining metals to a degree adequate to reduce metals in solution with such waste water to the predetermined level.

Such monitoring and administering steps (testing and control means) further include: (tubing means for) establishing a continuous sample flow from the main treatment tank; (liquid-solid separation means for) filtering the continuous sample flow to remove precipitated metals therefrom so as to provide a relatively clear continuous sample flow; (precipitating agent injection pump means for) continuously injecting a relatively diluted amount of the given precipitating agent into the relatively clear continuous sample flow at an injection point in such flow; (turbidity meter means for) detecting the turbidity of such flow at a point downstream from such injection point, the degree of such turbidity varying in proportion with the degree to which additional metals are precipitated by the injecting of the diluted given precipitating agent; and (precipitating agent controlled pump means for) actuating administering of such given precipitating agent to the main treatment tank responsive to the degree of detected turbidity.

Such administering of the precipitating agent is in accordance with a monitored need for additional precipitation measures other than pH level control, which minimizes sludge production inherently generated by use of such precipitating agent.

Still further embodiments of the present invention relate to a method of, and corresponding device for, controlling the level of a consumable agent present in a given generally aqueous medium having solids in solution therein, such agent being consumed while such given medium is involved in a continuous process, such embodiments including: establishing a sample flow from the given medium; filtering the sample flow established from the given medium, for substantially removing precipitated solids therefrom to provide a clear sample flow; providing a given indicator solution which reacts in such sample flow so as to create precipitation therefrom of any solids remaining in solution in the given medium; injecting the given indicator solution into the clear sample flow; sensing the degree of turbidity of such sample flow downstream from such injecting, which degree of turbidity is in direct proportion with the degree of precipitation brought on by injecting of such given indicator solution into such flow; and replenishing the consumable agent in the given medium in proportion to the sensed degree of turbidity of such sample flow. In such embodiments, the level of such consumable agent in the given medium can be monitored and regulated as desired relative the continuous process in which the given medium is involved.

While specific exemplary embodiments are disclosed above, and discussed in greater detail below, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate various modifications to features and aspects of this invention which may be practiced in accordance with the broader teachings thereof. Such modifications include, but are not limited to, variations in particular means, steps, or features, various combinations thereof, and various substitution of equivalent features and means, or the like. It is intended by virtue of present reference thereto that all such modifications and variations come within the spirit and scope of this invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A full and enabling disclosure of the present invention, including the best mode thereof, is set forth below, in conjunction with reference to the accompanying figures, in which:

FIG. 1 comprises a block diagram representation of one embodiment in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 2a comprises a block diagram representation of one embodiment in accordance with the present invention of the testing and control means of FIG. 1;

FIG. 2b comprises a block diagram representation of an alternative embodiment to that of FIG. 2a, for the testing and control means of present FIG. 1; and

FIG. 3 comprises a diagrammatical view of a multi-stage waste water treatment system incorporating heavy metal waste water treatment features in accordance with the present invention.

Repeat use of reference characters throughout the following specification and accompanying figures is intended to represent same or analogous features, elements, or aspects of this invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In conjunction with the following description of exemplary embodiments of this invention, it is to be understood that features and aspects of this invention may be variously practiced in combination with a variety of waste water treatment systems, not all of which are necessarily shown nor explicitly mentioned hereinafter. However, specific exemplary embodiments are presented herewith and discussed in detail below to provide those of ordinary skill in the art with an adequate disclosure of this invention for practicing same, either as shown and discussed herein or as adapted by such persons from time to time for conformance with their particular requirements.

As relates to waste water treatment, one aspect of this invention as represented by present FIG. 1 is that a filtered sample of waste water is obtained and monitored for determining controlled feeding of a given precipitating agent. Such methodology, even if readily accomplished with individual components which independent of one another are previously known, advantageously p