WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Optical waveguide display system    
United States Patent5009483   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/5009483.html
Inventor(s)Rockwell, III; Marshall A. (303 Grenola St., Pacific Palisades, CA 90272)
AbstractA thin-panel, large, high-definition television screen employs optical waveguides. Light (32) flows through waveguides (28) arranged, in parallel, across a substrate (64). Light from a source (44) is coupled into the waveguides using a Graded Index (GRIN) microlens array (56). Taps (37) direct light out and make it visible at different locations along the length of the waveguides. Long interaction length (8) taps with reflectors (10) are introduced which enable many waveguides to be staggered and placed side-by-side to maintain high screen resolutions. Polymers, both electro-optic and non-electro-optic, are used in the preferred embodiment as a waveguide building material. However, acousto-optic, thermo-optic (86) and magneto-optic effects may also be used with other materials such as glass and silicon dioxide. This display can be economically produced by forming a flexible waveguide ribbon (62) which integrates multiple waveguides (1), intensity modulators (40) and taps (38) into a single unit. Waveguide display manufacturing techniques based on thermo-poling (100), photolocking (114), extrusion (124), and preform fiber-drawing (132) are also presented.
   














 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History
Drawing from US Patent 5009483
Optical waveguide display system - US Patent 5009483 Drawing
Optical waveguide display system
Inventor     Rockwell, III; Marshall A. (303 Grenola St., Pacific Palisades, CA 90272)
Owner/Assignee    
Patent assignment
All assignments
Publication Date     April 23, 1991
Application Number     07/385,910
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     July 25, 1989
US Classification     385/116 40/547 348/804 385/1 385/2
Int'l Classification     G02B 006/04
Examiner     Gonzalez; Frank
Assistant Examiner    
Attorney/Law Firm    
Address
Parent Case    
Priority Data    
USPTO Field of Search     350/96.1 350/96.11 350/96.12 350/96.13 350/96.14 350/96.15 350/96.16 350/96.19 350/96.24 350/96.25 358/901 40/547 362/32
Patent Tags     optical waveguide display
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
3535018



[0 after 0 votes]
3871747



[0 after 0 votes]
4936663
Mori
385/31
Jun,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4845596
Mouissie
362/560
Jul,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4822123
Mori
385/31
Apr,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4763984
Awai
385/31
Aug,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4576436
Daniel
385/25
Mar,1986

[0 after 0 votes]
4422719
Orcutt
385/123
Dec,1983

[0 after 0 votes]
4389085
Mori
359/591
Jun,1983

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


I claim:

1. A visual optical switching element comprising:

a first elongated transparent optical material,

a second elongated optical material,

said first and said second optical materials arranged alongside each other,

a light source positioned in a light coupling relationship to said first elongated optical material,

a means for causing some of the light traveling through said first optical material from said light source to exit selectively into said second optical material so light can be observed by a viewer,

a means of altering the path taken by light traveling through said second optical material,

said path altering means consisting of a plurality of abrupt discontinuities formed in said second optical material.

2. The visual optical switching element as claimed in claim 1 in which said abrupt discontinuities comprise indentations formed in at least one part of the surface of said second optical material.

3. The visual optical switching element as claimed in claim 2 in which said indentations are at least partially covered with a light reflective material.

4. The visual optical switching element as claimed in claim 2 in which said indentations are filled with a light scattering material.

5. The visual optical switching element as claimed in claim 1 in which said first optical material comprises an optical waveguide.

6. The visual optical switching element as claimed in claim 1 in which said second optical material guides light from said first optical material a substantial distance before reaching an abrupt discontinuity.

7. The visual optical switching element as claimed in claim 1 in which said selective light exiting means is one of electro-optic, acousto-optic, magneto-optic, and thermo-optic devices.

8. A display system comprising:

a plurality of parallel optical waveguides,

a plurality of controllable light emitting regions of approximately uniform size and shape,

said controllable light emitting regions spaced apart along the length of each individual waveguide in said plurality of optical waveguides,

said controllable light emitting regions offset a distance oriented along the direction of light travel through said plurality of waveguides such that said light emitting regions associated with adjacent waveguides are not situated directly next to each other.

9. The display system as claimed in claim 8 in which said controllable light emitting regions are approximately the size of the core diameter of the individual waveguides in said plurality of waveguides.

10. The display system as claimed in claim 9 in which said controllable light emitting regions are spaced relatively far apart along the length of the waveguides when compared with the size of the light emitted from said controllable light emitting regions.

11. The display system as claimed in claim 8 in which said controllable light emitting regions is one of acousto-optic, electro-optic, thermo-optic and magneto-optic devices.

12. The display system as claimed in claim 9 in which light from said controllable light emitting regions is passed through a light diffusing material.

13. The display system as claimed in claim 8 in which light from said light source is directed into the cores of said plurality of waveguides with at least one graded index lens.

14. A display system comprising:

a plurality of parallel optical waveguides,

a plurality of controllable light emitting regions of approximately uniform size and shape,

said controllable light emitting regions spaced apart along the length of each individual waveguide in said plurality of optical waveguides,

in which said controllable light emitting regions are staggered on separate waveguides so high screen area pixel resolutions can be achieved while using long interaction length taps.

15. The display system as claimed in claim 14 in which said controllable light emitting regions are one of electro-optic, acousto-optic, magneto-optic, and thermo-optic devices.

16. A display system comprising:

a plurality of solid optical waveguides,

a light source positioned in a light coupling relationship to said plurality of optical waveguides,

and a thermo-optic light exiting means for causing a portion of light traveling through said plurality of solid optical waveguides to exit selectively so light can be viewed at selected locations oriented along the lengths of the waveguides in said plurality of waveguides.

17. The display system as claimed in claim 16 in which a controllable heating element is placed in proximity to said plurality of solid optical waveguides.

18. The display system as claimed in claim 16 in which said thermo-optic light exiting means comprises two waveguides which are placed in close proximity.

19. The display system as claimed in claim 18 in which a controllable heating element is placed in proximity to said two waveguides.

20. The display system as claimed in claim 18 in which light is abruptly removed from one of said two waveguides.

21. A display system comprising:

a plurality of regularly spaced parallel optical waveguides,

a plurality of separate electrodes which control the amount of light flowing through said plurality of optical waveguides,

each individual electrode in said plurality of separate electrodes configured to only control the amount of light flowing through a single waveguide in said plurality of optical waveguides,

said plurality of separate electrode elements shaped so the electrode extends a distance normal to the direction of light flow through said plurality of optical waveguides,

said electrode distance exceeding the closest distance separating two adjacent parallel waveguides in said plurality of regularly spaced optical waveguides.

22. The display as claimed in claim 21 in which said electrodes are opaque.

23. The display as claimed in claim 21 in which said electrodes are transparent.
 Description Submit all comments and votes
 


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention is a continuation-in-part of the pending patent application entitled "Optical Waveguide Display System" filed Apr. 12, 1989 and which has U.S. Pat. Ser. No. 337,141 (still pending). The parent application describes how to switch guided light out of an optical waveguide. Images are formed by systematically switching light out of many parallel waveguides arranged, side-by-side, on a substrate.

2. Prior Art

The prior application details how to switch (tap) guided light out from a waveguide core with sound. Sound is generated by separate transducers oriented alongside the length of a waveguide. Sound waves interact with guided light via the acousto-optic effect. Changes in the waveguide refractive index create light emitting regions at different locations where individual transducers are placed along the length of the waveguide. By using many transducers, and many parallel waveguides, images can be formed on a viewing screen.

Recently, research has revealed a number of limitations inherent in the acousto-optic display method. First, acoustic taps have high electrical drive power requirements because sound must be continuously generated to operate the tap. Typically, sound from a transducer propagates perpindicularly to the direction of light flow through a waveguide core. This sound passes through the waveguide core and is absorbed by material on the other side of the waveguide. Sound traveling beyond the waveguide core does not interact with guided light. Consequently, since most of the acoustic energy travels into non-core regions, sound must continuously be generated by the transducer to operate the tap. This is wasteful, hence the energy requirements of acoustic taps are high.

Second, optical waveguide displays have low resolutions due to the long acousto-optic tap interaction lengths that are needed to efficiently switch light out of the waveguide. The interaction length is the distance light must travel through a waveguide tap before exiting from the core. The screen resolution, as described in the prior application, is determined by the number of consecutive taps which can be placed along the length of a single waveguide. Thus, the longer the tap interaction length, the fewer the number of taps which can be arranged along a given length of waveguide. The acousto-optic tap interaction length is presently estimated to be.apprxeq.10 cm.

The third major disadvantage to acousto-optic taps is the small degree with which sound can change the waveguide refractive index. Sound can induce refractive index changes in silicon dioxide and other commonly used waveguide materials on the order of .DELTA.n.apprxeq.10.sup.-5. Because this refractive index change is extremely small, waveguides must be specially designed so waveguide taps can function with small acousto-optic effects.

Waveguides suitable for use in conjunction with acousto-optic taps are constructed by making the cladding layer surrounding the core very thin. A thin cladding layer allows the evanescent field of core guided light to interact with materials outside the cladding. A small refractive index change in a thin cladding waveguide shifts the evanescent field of the guided light out beyond the cladding. Once outside the cladding, guided light is scattered, or refracted, so it can be seen by a viewer.

Presently, the light guiding ability of a thin cladding waveguide changes when it is exposed to different temperature conditions. A thin cladding waveguide which guides light well at a low temperature will have an increased attenuation at higher temperatures. This increased attenuation is caused by the large refractive index change induced by the thermo-optic effect. For example, a temperature difference in glass of only 20.degree. C. causes a change in .DELTA.n>10.sup.-5. This thermo-optic refractive index change is larger than the highest attainable acousto-optic refractive index change. Consequently, a thin-cladding waveguide used in conjunction with acoustic taps is very sensitive to thermal conditions and can only operate in an environment where the temperature is carefully controlled.

Art related to this invention is disclosed by M. Gottlieb and G.B. Brandt, "Temperature sensing in optical fibers using cladding and jacket loss effects", Applied Optics, Vol. 20, No. 22, Nov. 15, 1981, pp. 3867-3873; M. Gottlieb et. al "Measurement of Temperature with Optical Fibers", ISA Transactions, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 55-62; J. R. Hill et. al., "Synthesis and Use of Acrylate Polymers for Non-linear Optics", Organic Materials for Non-linear Optics, Royal Society of Chemistry - Dalton Division, Oxford, 29-30 June 1988, pp. 405-411; J. R. Hill et. al., "Demonstration of the linear electro-optic effect in a thermopoled polymer film", J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 64, No. 5, Sept. 1, 1988, pp. 2749-2751; E.A. Chandross et. al., "Photolocking - A new technique for fabricating optical waveguide circuits", Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 24, No. 2, Jan. 15, 1974, pp. 72- 74; Hilmar Franke, "Optical recording of refractive-index patterns in doped poly - (methyl methacrylate) films", Applied Optics, Vol. 23, No. 16, Aug. 15, 1984, pp. 2729-2733; Takashi Kurokawa, "Polymer optical circuits for multimode optical fiber systems", Applied Optics, Vol. 19, No. 18, Sept. 15, 1980, pp. 3124-3129; M. Haruna and J. Koyama, "Thermooptic reflection and switching in glass", Applied Optics, Vol. 21, No. 19, Oct. 1, 1982, pp. 3461-3465; Andrew J. Lovinger, "Ferroelectric Polymers", Science, Vol. 220, No. 4602, June 10, 1983, pp. 1115-1121; D. Bosc and P. Grosso, "Polymer acousto-optic modulator working at 20 Mhz", 2nd International Conference on Passive Components: Materials, Technologies, Processing, Paris, France, Nov. 18-20, 1987, pp. 107-112; D. R. Ulrich, "Overview: Non-linear Optical Organics and Devices", Organic Materials for Non-linear Optics, Royal Society of Chemistry - Dalton Division, Oxford, June 29-30, 1988, pp. 241-263; Brettle et. al., "Polymeric non-linear optical waveguides", SPIE Vol. 824 Advances in Nonlinear Polymers and Inorganic Crystals, Liquid Crystals, and Laser Media (1987 ), pp. 171-177; R. Lytel et. al., "Advances in organic electro-optic devices", SPIE Vol. 824 Advances in Nonlinear Polymers and Inorganic Crystals, Liquid Crystals, and Laser Media (1987), pp. 152-161; NCAP Technology Report, Taliq Corporation, Sunnyvale CA.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Objects of the Invention

Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to show an improved electroptic tap for use in optical waveguide display systems.

Another object is to show an improved waveguide tap comprising a long interaction region and a light reflecting element.

Yet another object is to show a staggered, multi-waveguide, tap-arrangement method which enables high screen pixel resolutions to be maintained while using long interaction length taps.

A further object is to show waveguide manufacturing techniques based on thermo-poling, photolocking, extrusion and preform/furnace fiber drawing.

Another object is to show a Graded Index (GRIN) microlens focusing method for efficiently guiding light from a source into many waveguide core elements.

Yet another object is to show how to use broad-spectrum light to produce color display images in optical waveguide displays.

Still another object is to show a new type of thermo-optic waveguide tap.

These and additional objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more obvious from the following description when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.

Brief Description

The invention comprises a number of improvements in the individual elements required to construct an optical waveguide display. For example, a new long interaction length waveguide tap based on electroptic effects is detailed. Also, a focusing element which directs light from the source into the waveguide cores is introduced. Finally, polymer processing techniques are described which make waveguide displays less expensive to manufacture. Taken together, these improvements enable large flat panel screens to be economically produced.

A new type of waveguide tap structure is introduced. In the tap interaction region, guided light is coupled through the cladding, from the core, into a second waveguide running alongside the cladding. The second waveguide, hereinafter referred to as the "supercladding", guides light in a direction oriented parallel to the core. Light coupled out from the core travels through the supercladding until it hits a small reflector formed in the supercladding. The reflector, in turn, directs light out of the supercladding to the viewer. Thus, light coupled into the supercladding from the core over a long interaction length appears as a small light emitting region located at a supercladding reflector.

The supercladding/reflector tap structure enables high screen resolutions to be maintained while using long interaction length taps. To maintain a high screen resoltion multiple waveguides are placed, side-by-side, next to each other. Each waveguide still contains a small number of long interaction length supercladding/reflector taps. However, the reflectors on separate waveguides are slightly offset, or staggered, to achieve a higher resolution. The combined effect of many parallel waveguides, each with their limited number of staggered taps, increases the display resolution.

Another important innovation is an energy efficient tap design which uses electro-optic effects. Electro-optic materials change their index of refraction in an electric field. By using electro-optic materials to construct the waveguide core, cladding and/or supercladding elements the amount of power needed to drive the taps, and hence the screen, is lowered. Non-linear and ferroelectric polymers are presently considered the best electro-optic waveguide building materials.

An entirely different type of tap based on thermo-optic effects is also described. Thermo-optic taps comprise a heating element placed in close proximity to the waveguide core, cladding and supercladding. The heating element causes the index of refraction in these waveguide layers to change at different rates. Slight differences in the refractive index rate of change in separate waveguide layers force light to couple out of the core and into the supercladding. Thermo-optic taps are simple to fabricate and have excellent environmental stability.

Improvements in the light-source-to-waveguide-coupling elements are also presented. Graded Index lenses (GRIN) reduce a collimated beam of light to a very small size. Multiple GRIN lenses are used to efficiently focus light from a source into the many waveguide core elements used in the display.

Finally, plastic waveguide processing techniques are described which enable large numbers of waveguides to be economically manufactured. Plastics can be extruded, molded, laminated, etched, doped, drawn, stamped, machined, thermo-poled and photolocked to form optical waveguides. Optical waveguides can be mass produced using these manufacturing techniques at a low cost.

The attainment of the foregoing and related objects, features and advantages of the invention will be more readily apparent to those skilled in the art, after review of the following detailed description of the invention, taken together with the included drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1A is a side view of a waveguide tap showing how light is coupled out of a core into a supercladding and reflected out to the viewer.

FIG. 1B is a side view of waveguide tap showing how light is coupled out of a core into a supercladding, reflected back through the waveguide core, and directed out to the viewer.

FIG. 1C is a side view of a waveguide tap showing how light is coupled out into two supercladdings placed on each side of a waveguide core, reflected from the front and reflected back through the waveguide core, and directed out to the viewer.

FIG. 2A is a schematic view of a single waveguide with multiple short interaction length taps placed at even intervals along its length.

FIG. 2B is a schematic view of two waveguides with medium interaction length taps, and staggered reflectors, that when taken in combination, achieve the same adjacent pixel resolution as shown in FIG. 2A.

FIG. 2C is a schematic view of four waveguides with long interaction length taps, and staggered reflectors, which achieve the same adjacent pixel resolution as shown in FIG. 2A.

FIG. 3A is an end view of a ribbon containing multiple supercladding elements arranged on one side of multiple core elements.

FIG. 3B is an end view of a ribbon containing multiple supercladding elements arranged on both sides of multiple core elements.

FIG. 4A is an end view of a ribbon containing multiple supercladding elements arranged on one side of multiple core elements such that the core, cladding and supercladding elements are isolated from each other.

FIG. 4B is an end view of a ribbon containing multiple supercladding elements arranged on both sides of the ribbon cores where the core, cladding and supercladding elements are isolated from each other.

FIG. 5A is the back of a waveguide ribbon which shows the intensity modulator and tap electrodes.

FIG. 5B is the light emitting side of the same ribbon in FIG. 5 showing the ground conductors and supercladding reflectors which direct light out from the waveguides to the viewer.

FIG. 6 is a rear view of a complete display comprising a light source, multiple ribbons which are folded and spread out side-by-side to cover a substrate.

FIG. 7A shows a thermo-optic tap element which switches light by heating an element placed in close proximity to the core, cladding and supercladding elements.

FIG. 7B shows a thermo-optic tap element which switches light by heating the cladding and supercladding elements through the core.

FIG. 8A shows a waveguide ribbon based on the thermo-optic tap shown in FIG. 7A.

FIG. 8B shows a waveguide ribbon based on the thermo-optic tap shown in FIG. 7B.

FIG. 9A shows a photolocking process used to manufacture optical waveguide ribbon.

FIG. 9B shows a thermo-poling process used to manufacture optical waveguide ribbon.

FIG. 10A shows a side view of a extrusion process used to manufacture waveguide ribbon.

FIG. 10B shows a front view of the extrusion manufacturing process shown in FIG. 10A.

FIG. 11 shows a ribbon manufacturing process based on heating and drawing a ribbon preform containing multiple waveguide elements.

FIG. 12 shows a block diagram of a complete optical waveguide display system.

DRAWING REFERENCE NUMBERS

1 Optical waveguides

2 Width of a single waveguide

3 All of the waveguides with staggered taps which make up a vertical column

4 Reflector spacing when more than one waveguide is in a column 3

6 Reflector spacing when a single waveguide is used for column 3

8 Tap interaction region (i.e. - where light is coupled from the core into the super cladding)

10 Reflector region (i.e. - where light is directed out of the supercladding to the viewer)

12 Direction of light flow through the waveguide

14 Ground

16 DC voltage

18 Signal conductor

20 Ground conductor

21 Ground conductor for intensity modulators

22 Cladding

24 Thin-layer cladding (i.e. - electro-optic material)

25 Waveguide isolation layer (clear optical, metallic or opaque material)

26 Supercladding (i.e. - electro-optic material)

28 Core

30 Direction of light reflected out of supercladding to the viewer

32 Light exiting the end of the waveguides

34 Dark layer to improve screen contrast ratio

36 Intensity modulator ribbon reflector elements

37 Tap conductor element extends to edge of ribbon

38 Staggered tap fingers define a vertical column 3

39 Reflector regions on ribbon direct tap supercladding light to the viewer

40 Interaction region 8 for intensity modulators

41 Intensity modulator spacing

42 Large size bonding pads associated with intensity modulators

43 Intensity modulator electrode

44 Light source

46 White light from source 44

48 Collimating focusing optics

50 Collimated white light

52 Light coloring element

54 Colored light

56 Focusing lens (GRIN) to direct collimated and colored light 54 into the ribbon cores

58 Focused light entering ribbon stack 60

60 Stack of waveguide ribbons

62 Bend regions where each ribbon in the stack is folded over and arranged across the substrate

64 Screen substrate

66 Individual ribbons

67 Light exiting the end of the ribbons

68 Clear viewing window in substrate so light can make it from the ribbon reflectors 39 to the viewer

70 Gap between separate ribbons taps - usually made conductive

72 Heating element

74 Optical buffer for separating thermal heating element 72

76 Substrate material (also cladding)

78 Core

80 Light confined in core

82 Light coupled into supercladding

84 Supercladding

86 Heated region

88 Thin cladding between core and supercladding

90 Electronics to control the intensity modulators

92 Electronics to control the taps

94 Controller which provides information and synchronizes the tap and intensity modulators to form complete screen images

96 Electrode brushes contacting the ribbon electrodes to pole waveguide regions into the ribbon

98 Heat

100 Thermo-poled waveguides formed in the plastic sheet

102 Direction ribbon moves through processing machine

104 Direction ribbon on spool rotates

106 Unprocessed ribbon on the spool

108 Ribbon before it encounters the waveguide processing step

110 Photolocking light source to expose waveguide regions in the ribbon

112 Light beams passing through ribbon 108 to expose the waveguide regions

114 Waveguide regions formed by heating the plastic material 108

116 Rollers

118 Extrusion die

120 Melted optical grade plastic or glass

122 Vesicle containing melted optical waveguide material

124 Waveguides formed by extrusion

126 Fiber preforms before heat-drawing

128 Furnace to melt and stretch prefroms

130 Direction preform is passed through the furnace

132 Waveguide preforms being heated, stretched and reduced to a smaller siz e

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Waveguide Taps

Turning now to the drawings, more particularly FIGS. 1A-1C, which show side views of three different long interaction length waveguide taps. The taps shown in these diagrams employ the electro-optic effect. However, long interaction length taps based on acousto-optic, thermo-optic and magneto-optic effects may also be constructed based on the ideas presented in the following sections. It is strongly intended that long interaction length taps which use these other effects be included within the scope of this discussion.

FIG. 1A shows light 32 traveling through a waveguide core 28. The tap is controlled by applying a voltage difference between conductors 20 and 18. The electric field produced by the voltage difference induces the electro-optic material in the tap interaction region 8 to change its index of refraction. Changes in the waveguide refractive index allow light to exit the core and enter into the supercladding 26.

Light travels through the transparent supercladding until it hits a reflector. FIGS. 1A-1C show three angled reflector regions 10 formed in the supercladding. The reflector redirects light out 30 of the supercladding so it can be observed. The reflector is preferrably formed by etching a pit in the supercladding. The pit is partially metalized, so that supercladding light entering the pit is blocked and reflected out of the supercladding 30. All the light traveling through the supercladding hits a reflector and is directed out 30 to the viewer. The interaction length 8 plus the reflector region length 10 equals the total length of a tap.

FIG. 1B shows light 30 being reflected out through the waveguide core 28 and cladding 22 layers. As in FIG. 1A, light is coupled out into the supercladding 26 in the interaction region 8. However, instead of being reflected 30 directly to the viewer, light in the supercladding 26 must first pass through the cladding 22 and core 28 layers.

FIG. 1C shows a hybrid combination of the taps shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B. Two supercladdings 26, one on either side of the core, carry light tapped out in the interaction region 8. By using two supercladdings the interaction length 8 needed to couple light out from a waveguide core 28 is decreased. Light evanescently interacts more strongly with the supercladdings 26 because there are two thin-claddings 24 arranged on each side of the core 28. Reflectors formed in both supercladdings 10 direct light to the viewer 30.

The preferred core-to-supercladding coupling mechanism uses the evanescent field of the core guided light. Guided light can interact with materials placed near the cladding and core via its evanescent field. Evanescent field interactions allow very slight refractive index changes to efficiently tap guided light out of the core and into the supercladding.

The supercladding is preferably made of a material with a higher index of refraction than the core. A high supercladding index of refraction causes light coupled into the supercladding to be angled away from the core. Angling light away from the core causes it to be more centrally located in the middle of the supercladding. This makes it is easier to remove light at a reflector region 10 since the reflector pit does not need to be formed as deeply in the supercladding 26 to remove the centrally located supercladding light.

Either the cladding, core, and/or supercladding may be made of electro-optic materials. In one embodiment only the cladding 24 is made of an electro-optic material. A voltage difference 16 applied to the electrodes causes the electro-optic cladding 24 to increase its index of refraction. Increasing the cladding refractive index forces guided light to interact with the supercladding 26. Light is stripped out of the core and travels through the supercladding 26 until it hits a reflector region 10.

In a different tap embodiment, an electro-optic supercladding 26 can be made to act as part of a non-electro-optic cladding. In this configuration, the evanescent field of light in the waveguide core extends through the cladding into the supercladding. When the tap is "off", the supercladding has an index of refraction approximately equal to the cladding. In the "off" state, the supercladding and cladding collectively act to guide light through the waveguide. In other words, the cladding alone is not enough to confine and guide light through the waveguide core.

However, when the tap is switched "on" the refractive index of the electro-optic supercladding increases. This refractive index increase couples light out from the waveguide core into the supercladding. Light travels through the electro-optic supercladding until it hits a reflector 30.

Forming only the supercladding out of an electro-optic material has the advantage that the core and cladding layers can be made from traditional non-electro-optic waveguide materials. Very low loss non-electro-optic materials have been developed which are capable of guiding light long distances, typically 100 meters or more, with little attenuation. On the other hand, electro-optic waveguide materials presently have optical losses in the range of 1 dB/cm. If the core and cladding were made of currently available electro-optic materials, attenuation of light in the waveguide would be prohibitively high.

To reduce loss, the waveguide is designed so only a small fraction of the guided evanescent wave extends past the cladding into the electro-optic supercladding. Most of the light in the waveguide travels through the non-electro-optic core and cladding. Only the small fraction of guided light which actually extends into the electro-optic supercladding is more highly attenuated. Thus, high loss electro-optic materials can still be used to build display waveguides.

There are other ways to use electro-optic materials to tap light out of optical waveguides. Diffractive and/or refractive effects may also be employed. For example, the core can be made of alternating layers of electro-optic and non-electro-optic materials. (not shown) In the absence of an electric field, the electro-optic and non-electro-optic layers are chosen so they have the same index of refraction. However, when an electric field is applied to the waveguide, an increase in the index of refraction in the electro-optic core layers causes an irregular core refractive index. Diffraction and refraction effects caused by this irregular core refractive index force light to exit into the supercladding.

It is possible that a single supercladding reflector 10 will not be sufficient to deflect out all of the light in the supercladding 26. It is important that the reflector remove all of the light in the supercladding, otherwise, light will continue through the supercladding and be reflected at the next reflector. Light leaking between consecutive waveguide supercladding reflectors distorts the screen image. To prevent light leakage, multiple reflectors (not shown) may be placed close next to each other. A plurality of closely spaced reflectors in region 10 will insure all of the supercladding light is removed and directed to the viewer 30.

Other reflector-like means may also be used to remove supercladding light. For example, a diffusing material containing small scattering centers may be used to re-fill a supercladding reflector pit. Light interacting with the many small scattering centers will be re-directed out of the supercladding. Other light re-directing means based on lenses, pigments, and dyes can also be used. In general, anything which scatters, absorbs, deflects, refracts or blocks supercladding light can be used in a reflector region 10.

It should be mentioned that long interaction length 8 taps are relatively tolerant to irregularities encountered during the manufacturing process. The performance of long interaction length taps degrades gracefully due to their long length. Interaction lengths 8 typically will vary from 0.1-20 cm. This is much longer than the core and cladding dimensions which will typically be in the micron range. As a result, small irregularities in optical materials and the waveguide core and cladding dimensions have minimal effects on the performance of the waveguide tap.

In FIGS. 1A-1C the ground is 14 is connected to the bottom conductor 20 and the positive voltage 16, or signal, is connected to the top conductor 18. The connection of the ground 14 and voltage 16 to conductors 18 and 20 may be switched if desired. In fact, FIGS. 5 and 6 show layer 18 connected to ground 14 and layer 20 connected to the signal 16.

Staggered Taps on Multiple Waveguides

FIGS. 2A-2C show a schematic view of optical waveguide taps. The perspective in FIGS. 2A-2C is that of a viewer looking at the front of the display screen. If light were actually flowing direction 12 and emitted from the reflectors 30 shown in FIGS. 2B and 2C it would travel from the page toward the reader.

As previously mentioned, the small refractive index changes which can be achieved with acousto-optic, electro-optic and thermo-optic effects necessitate long tap interaction lengths. Long tap interaction lengths are needed to efficiently remove light from the waveguide. Short interaction length 8 taps can not remove enough core light to brightly illuminate screen pixels.

The total number of taps arranged along the length of a waveguide determines the resolution along one dimension of the display. Therefore, long tap interaction lengths 8 result in low screen resolutions. Consequently, there is a tradeoff between the screen resolution and the tap efficiency, or screen brightness. Long taps remove more light from the waveguide and are brighter. However, long taps cause the screen resolution to be low. Short taps increase the screen resolution, but at the expense of the screen brightness.

FIG. 2A shows a single waveguide with many short interaction length 6 taps. The only way to increase the resolution of a screen built with the waveguide shown in FIG. 2A is to decrease the tap interaction length 6. However, decreasing the tap interaction length 6 will decrease the efficiency of the taps.

FIGS. 2B and 2C show how to use multiple waveguides to achieve high screen resolutions with long interaction length taps. FIG. 2B shows two waveguides 1; each with half the width 2 of the single waveguide width 3 shown in FIG. 2A. The tap interaction length 8 plus the reflector region length 10 on each waveguide is twice as long as on the single waveguide shown in FIG. 2A. By staggering the interaction 8 and reflector 10 regions on two separate waveguides, the adjacent pixel spacing 4 is kept equal to the short tap interaction length 6 shown in FIG. 2A.

FIG. 2C shows how the tap interaction length increases when four waveguides are placed side-by-side. The interaction length 8 and reflector region 10 is twice as long as it is in FIG. 2B and four times as long as in FIG. 2A. Again, all of the light coupled out in the interaction region 8 is directed out of the waveguide at a reflector 10.

Many more than four parallel waveguides can be placed next to each other to achieve even longer interaction lengths 8. For example, if each reflector spacing 4 is 2 mm, each waveguide is 100 uM wide 2, and there are 20 waveguides in a column 3, the interaction 8 and reflector 10 length on each waveguide will be 40 mm. With these specifications a 500.times.500 element display screen can fit on a 1.times.1 meter substrate 64.

Staggering taps on separate waveguides causes consecutive pixels along the direction of light flow 12 to be horizontally displaced. Consecutive pixels in a column 3 have a "jagged" or "staircase" look because they are placed on separate, adjacent, waveguides. In addition, since the reflector size 10 gets smaller as more waveguides are placed next to each other, light emitted 30 from a reflector region 10 will appear as a small, point-like source.

To smooth the jagged, point-like, reflector appearance a diffusing material (not shown) may be positioned between the viewer and the reflectors 10. A diffusing material scatters reflector light and makes a larger light emitting area. Consequently, instead of a small point source, the diffusing layer causes reflector light to appear as a large, planar, light emitting area. Reflector light 30 traveling through the diffusing layer should exit with a lambertian intensity profile.

Reflector light scattered in the diffusing layer should be confined to a region with a width which equals all the parallel waveguides 1 in a column. For example, in FIGS. 2B and 2C, light emitted from a reflector 30 should illuminate an area in the diffusing layer equal to the column width 3. The length of the light diffusing region should equal the adjacent reflector spacing 4 or 6.

Reflector 30 light in the diffusing layer can be isolated by forming light barriers in the diffusing material. Light barriers are conveniently formed by molding, stamping or extruding a diffusing plastic to create optically separate scattering regions. In this way, screen pixels can be made which have large, sharply defined, light emitting areas.

Optical Waveguide Ribbon

FIGS. 3A-3B and 4A-4B show cross sections of four different types of optical waveguide ribbon. FIG. 3A, shows multiple waveguide ribbon cores 28 surrounded by cladding 22. A thin cladding layer 24 is positioned between the core 28 and the supercladding 26. The core is typically 1-200 uM thick. Light is coupled out of the cores 28, through the thin cladding 24, into the supercladding 26 and travels 30 to the viewer. As previously mentioned, the light coupling method may use evanescent field coupling, diffractive or other refractive effects.

A light absorbing material 34 is placed on one side of the ribbon to increase the screen contrast ratio. The light absorbing material can be placed on either side of the ribbon depending on how the reflectors 10 are formed in the supercladding. If the reflector is similar to the one shown in FIG. 1A, the light absorbing material 34 is placed on the top. If the tap is similar to the one shown in FIG. 1B, the absorbing layer 34