|
|
|
| United States Patent | 5091262 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/5091262.html |
| Inventor(s) | Knott; Jack E. (Barrington, IL);
Gage; Paul D. (Eau Claire, WI) |
| Abstract | A starch filled, coextruded degradable polyethylene film includes a starch
filled inner layer positioned between two outer layers that contain a
prodegradant. The outer layers of the film, which contain no starch,
enable the film to retain desirable physical properties similar to
conventional polyethylene film. The prodegradant causes the outer layers
of the film to degrade under appropriate conditions exposing the starch
filled inner layer. The starch in the inner layer then serves as a source
of nutrients for microorganisms which consume starch, leaving a porous
structure that is vulnerable to oxidation, hydrolysis, direct enzyme
action or combinations of these processes. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
February 25, 1992 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
August 27, 1990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 3454510
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3797690
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3850862
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3850863
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3907729
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4873270 Aime 523/128 Oct,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4839450 Fanta
Jun,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4673438 Wittwer 106/145.1 Jun,1987 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4503098 Potts 427/394 Mar,1985 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4337181 Otey 523/128 Jun,1982 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4324709 Griffin 523/210 Apr,1982 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4218350 Griffin 523/210 Aug,1980 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4133784 Otey 523/128 Jan,1979 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4026849 Bagley 527/314 May,1977 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4021388 Griffin 523/128 May,1977 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4016117 Griffin 523/128 Apr,1977 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4009313 Crawford 442/123 Feb,1977 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3952347 Comerford 5/484 Apr,1976 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3940145 Gentiluomo 473/377 Feb,1976 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3932319 Clendinning 47/74 Jan,1976 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3931068 Clendinning 524/14 Jan,1976 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4125495 Griffin 524/51 Dec,1969 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
|
|
|
| Market Size |
|
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market
sector:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Market Share |
|
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Reasonable Royalty |
|
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
|
| | |
| |
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
|
| Market Size | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Market Share | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Reasonable Royalty | N/A | [No votes] |
| | N/A | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Technical Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
I claim:
1. A multilayer film comprising:
a center layer coextruded with adjacent exterior layers, the center layer
comprising a mixture of polyethylene and starch, the exterior layers
comprising a mixture of polyethylene and at least one prodegradant.
2. The film of claim 1 wherein said center layer comprises from about 3% to
about 40% starch.
3. The film of claim 1 wherein the starch is selected from the group
consisting of corn, maize, wheat, rice and potato starch, starch
components, modified starch products, and mixtures thereof.
4. The film of claim 1 wherein the prodegradant is selected from the group
consisting of transition metals, transition metal compounds, unsaturated
polymers and mixtures thereof.
5. The film of claim 1 wherein the prodegradant is selected from the group
consisting of manganese, manganese salts, iron, iron salts, vegetable
oils, fats, fatty acids, unsaturated block copolymers and mixtures
thereof.
6. The film of claim 1 wherein each exterior layer comprises from about 5%
to about 20% of the total film thickness.
7. The film of claim 1 wherein each exterior layer comprises about 10% of
the total film thickness.
8. The film of claim 1 wherein said film is from about 0.75 miles to about
7 miles in thickness.
9. A multilayer film comprising:
a center layer coextruded with adjacent exterior layers, the center layer
comprising a mixture of from about 60% to about 97% polyethylene and from
about 3% to about 40% starch, the exterior layers comprising a mixture of
polyethylene and at least one prodegradant.
10. The film of claim 9 wherein the starch is selected from the group
consisting of corn, maize, wheat, rice and potato starch, starch
components, modified starch products, and mixtures thereof.
11. The film of claim 9 wherein the prodegradant is selected from the group
consisting of transition metals, transition metal compounds, unsaturated
polymers and mixtures thereof.
12. The film of claim 9 wherein the prodegradant is selected from the group
consisting of manganese, manganese salts, iron, iron salts, vegetable
oils, fats, fatty acids, unsaturated block copolymers and mixtures
thereof.
13. The film of claim 9 wherein each exterior layer comprises from about 5%
to about 20% of the total film thickness.
14. The film of claim 9 wherein each exterior layer comprises about 10% of
the total film thickness.
15. The film of claim 9 wherein said film is from about 0.75 mils to about
7 miles in thickness.
16. A multilayer film having a thickness from about 0.75 miles to about 7
miles, said film comprising:
a center layer coextruded with adjacent exterior layers, the center layer
comprising a mixture of from about 60% to about 97% polyethylene and from
about 3% to about 40% of a starch selected from the group consisting of
corn, maize, wheat, rice and potato starch, starch components, modified
starch products, and mixtures thereof;
the exterior layers comprising a mixture of polyethylene and about 5% to
about 15% of at least one prodegradant selected from the group consisting
of transition metals, transition metal compounds, unsaturated polymers and
mixtures thereof, each of the exterior layers comprising from about 55 to
about 20% of the total film thickness.
17. The film of claim 16 wherein the prodegradant is selected from the
group consisting of manganese, manganese salts, iron, iron salts,
vegetable oils, fats, fatty acids, unsaturated block copolymers and
mixtures thereof. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates to a starch filled coextruded degradable film.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Polyethylene films are used in a wide variety of applications including
stretch/cling (pallet wraps etc.), grocery bags, heavy duty shipping
sacks, disposable diapers, food wraps and agricultural films. Large
volumes of polyethylene film are used in these applications on a daily
basis. Decomposition of conventional polyethylene films, however, takes
long periods of time under most conditions. Thus, a need has arisen for a
degradable polyethylene film suitable for use in various products.
A degradable composition comprising a synthetic resin, a degradable
granular filler such as natural starch granules and a substance
autoxidizable to yield a peroxide is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,016,117
issued Apr. 5, 1977 to Griffin. Purportedly, articles formed from the
composition described in this patent degrade as the starch granules
exposed at or adjacent the surface of the article are degraded and leached
away followed successively by degradation of particles at the interior to
produce a cellular structure which is more readily attacked by the
processes of oxidation, hydrolysis, direct enzyme action or combinations
of these processes.
The use of starch as a filler material in the production of thin
polyethylene films, however, causes major problems in the manufacturing
process. Starch, a hydrophilic material is incompatible with polyethylene,
a hydrophobic material. Due to the relative incompatibility of starch with
polyethylene and the difference in the surface energies of the respective
materials, starch migrates to the surface of the meltstream during the
extrusion process and collects on the die lips where the shear rates are
significant. The starch deposited on the die lips oxidizes and
intermittently picks off into the passing film material causing holes and
defects in the film product.
The use of starch as filler material in polyethylene film products also has
a significant impact on the physical properties of the film product. Major
reductions in gloss, elongation, toughness, tear strength, impact and
coefficient of friction result from the use of starch as a filler
material. Although the magnitude of the changes in physical properties
varies with different types of polyethylene, e.g., low density
polyethylene (LDPE) vs. linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE), the
changes are nonetheless significantly deleterious.
Thus, there is a need for a polyethylene film that is degradable and which
simultaneously substantially retains the desirable properties of
conventional polyethylene film.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a starch filled coextruded multilayer
degradable polyethylene film. A starch filled inner layer is positioned
between two outer layers that contain a prodegradant. The starch filled
inner layer provides a source of nutrients for microorganisms. The outer
layers of the film, which contain no starch, enable the film to retain the
desired physical properties, similar to conventional polyethylene film.
When the film is disposed of the prodegradant causes the outer layers of
the film to degrade exposing the starch filled inner layer. The starch in
the inner layer then may act as a source of nutrients for microorganisms
which consume the starch leaving a porous structure that is vulnerable to
oxidation, hydrolysis, direct enzyme action or combinations of these
processes.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The film of the present invention is a multilayer polyethylene film
produced with conventional coextrusion processes. The term "polyethylene"
as used herein refers to low, medium and high density polyethylenes, and
mixtures thereof, including low density polyethylene (LDPE), linear low
density polyethylene (LLDPE), ultra low density polyethylene (ULDPE),
ethylene copolymers and mixtures of polyethylene and other polymers
suitable for the manufacture of films and sheets.
The inner layer of the film of the present invention contains from about 3%
to about 40% starch. All percentages used herein are by weight unless
otherwise indicated. Starches are polysaccharide compounds which are
converted to sugar upon hydrolysis. The term "starch" as used herein
refers to any starch obtained from cereal grains or root crops such as
corn, maize, wheat, rice and potatoes, other starches, starch components,
modified starch products and mixtures thereof. Starch is a hydrophilic
material, having a strong tendency to bind or absorb water. Polyethylene,
on the other hand, is a hydrophobic material, basically antagonistic to
water. Consequently, polyethylene and starch are basically incompatible
and the inclusion of starch granules in a polyethylene film results in a
film having less desirable properties than conventional polyethylene film.
In order to compensate for the change in physical properties, the present
invention provides two starch free outer layers, each comprising from
about 5% to about 20% of the total film thickness. Preferably, each outer
layer comprises about 10% of the total film thickness.
Since the starch-free outer layers of the film prevent the exposure of the
starch contained in the inner layer, the film would not normally degrade
through attack on the starch. The present invention, however, provides a
prodegradant in the outer layers to facilitate the degradation of the
outer layers resulting in the exposure of the starch filled inner layer.
The functional components of the prodegradant are: (1) a transition metal
such as manganese or iron and salts thereof; and, (2) a quantity of an
unsaturated polymer such as vegetable oils, fats, fatty acids,
styrene-butadiene-styrene block copolymer or other unsaturated polymers of
a wide variety. Although the specific reaction kinetics and dynamics are
not well understood, it appears that the transition metal or transition
metal salt reacts initially with the unsaturated polymer or fatty acid
source at the surface of the film to produce peroxides and hydroperoxides
in the initial phase of the reaction. The peroxides and hydroperoxides
then initiate free radical chain reactions and ultimate oxidation of the
polyethylene film. Thus, the outer layers of the film of the present
invention degrade through oxidation and expose the starch filled inner
layer. The starch filled inner layer may also contain prodegradant in
order to increase the rate of degradation.
Preferably the outer layers of the film of the present invention contain
from about 5% to about 15% of a commercially available prodegradant system
sold by Archer Daniels Midland Co., Decatur, Ill. 62525 under the trade
designations ADM 012401 and ADM 012406. ADM 012401 is a metal catalyst
concentrate containing approximately 7200 ppm manganese in a linear low
density polyethylene base having a density of approximately 0.918
gm/cm.sup.3 and a melt index of about 2.0. ADM 012406 is 50%
styrene-butadiene-styrene unsaturated block copolymer and 50% linear low
density polyethylene having a density of about 0.924 and a melt index of
about 20.0. The styrene-butadiene-styrene copolymer contains about 70%
butadiene. The ratio of ADM 012406 to ADM 12401 is preferably about 4:1.
More preferably, the outer layers of the film contain about 10% of the
prodegradant system.
The films of the present invention may be produced in thickness from about
0.75 mils to about 7.0 mils using conventional cast and blown film
coextrusion techniques.
Preferably, the film is produced in thickness from between about 1.0 mil to
about 2.0 mils.
The invention will be further described with respect to the following
examples; however, the scope of the invention is not to be limited
thereby.
EXAMPLE 1
In order to illustrate the effect of incorporating starch in a polyethylene
film, films were produced from a low density polyethylene resin and from a
linear low density polyethylene resin in a conventional blown film
extrusion process. Each resin was used to produce a conventional and a
starch filled film. A commercially available starch master batch sold by
Ampacet Corp., 250 S. Terrace Ave., Mount Vernon, NY 10550 under the trade
designation Ampacet 20835 was added to the resins used to produce the
starch filled films at a rate resulting in a starch concentration in the
films of 6% by weight. Ampacet 20835 is a linear low density polyethylene
having a density of about 0.924 gm/cm.sup.3 and a melt index of about 20.0
that contains 40% starch, 14% unsaturated styrene-butadiene-styrene block
copolymer and about 500 ppm manganese. The films were tested and the
results are set forth in Table 1 below.
TABLE 1
______________________________________
Effect of Starch on Film Properties
LDPE LLDPE
+6% +6%
PROPERTY LDPE STARCH LLDPE STARCH
______________________________________
AV. GAUGE (.mu.m)
50 50 34 45
GLOSS (%) 70 25.7 67 25
TENSILES:
Elong. MD (%)
400 160 615 585
Elong. TD (%)
650 615 705 660
Stress MD (kPa)
24115 16363 30660 17225
Stress TD (kPa)
22392 11747 26660 16536
C.O.F. 0.60 0.39 1.0 0.53
TEAR
MD (g/mm) 3740 2559 6693 5315
TD (g/mm) 10236 9449 13779 13385
IMPACT (g/mm)
3740 1260 7480 5905
______________________________________
The foregoing example illustrates the deleterious effects on the physical
properties of films resulting from the addition of starch.
EXAMPLES 2-16
Coextruded polyethylene films were produced using conventional cast film
techniques. The films were cast with a starch filled center layer and
exterior layers containing varying concentrations of prodegradant. The
following commercially available materials were used to produce the films:
DOWLEX 2047A--LLDPE/octene copolymer having a melt index of about 2.3 and
a density of about 0.917 g/cm.sup.3 ; DOWLEX 2027A--a LLDPE/octene
copolymer having a melt index of 4.0 and a density of 0.941 g/cm.sup.3 ;
Rexene 1031S--a low density polyethylene homopolymer having a melt index
of 0.80 and a density of 0.924 g/cm.sup.3 ; Rexene 1068--a low density
polyethylene homopolymer having a melt index of about 5.5 and a density of
about 0.922 g/cm.sup.3 ; Quantum CM80707--a white color concentrate
containing about 50% titanium dioxide in a low density polyethylene base;
Ampacet 20835--a starch filled polyethylene aster batch; and, ADM 012401
with ADM 012406--a transition metal salt/unsaturated polymer prodegradant
system. The compositions of the core and exterior layers of the film are
set forth in Table 2 below.
TABLE 2
__________________________________________________________________________
ADM
Dowlex
Dowlex
Rexene
Rexene
Ampacet
012406/
CM
Example
2047A
2027A
1031S
1068
20835
012401
80707
__________________________________________________________________________
core-
40% 53% 7%
exterior 65% 35%
3, 4
core-
40% 45.5% 7.5% 7%
exterior 65% 35%
5, 6
core-
40% 45.5% 7.5% 7%
exterior 60% 30% 8%/2%
7, 8
core-
40% 30.5% 22.5% 7%
exterior 65% 35%
9, 10
core-
40% 30.5% 22.5% 7%
exterior 60% 30% 8%/2%
11, 12
core-
40% 38% 15% 7%
exterior 62.5% 32.5% 4%/1%
13
core-
40% 38% 15% 7%
exterior 65% 35%
14
core-
40% 45.5% 7.5% 7%
exterior 62.5% 32.5% 4%/1%
15
core-
40% 38% 15% 7%
exterior 60% 30% 8%/2%
16
core-
40% 30.5% 22.5% 7%
exterior 62.5% 32.5% 4%/1%
__________________________________________________________________________
In order to test the degradability of the films of Examples 2-16, the films
were aged at approximately 160.degree. F. For 24 days at a relative
humidity of approximately 50%. The physical properties of the films were
tested prior to aging and at 8-day intervals during the aging process. The
results of the tests are set forth in Tables 3-6 below.
TABLE 3
__________________________________________________________________________
Film Properties Prior to Aging
__________________________________________________________________________
Example ASTM
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
__________________________________________________________________________
Density (gms/cm.sup.3)
0.935
0.937
0.935
0.940
0.935
0.965
0.936
0.965
Gauge (mils) 1.24
1.35
1.30
1.30
1.34
1.39
1.36
1.31
Stress at: D-882
5% Elongation
MD 290 299 320 299 286 293 317 339
(gms) TD 271 273 287 302 264 294 296 295
10% Elongation
MD 589 612 638 612 581 572 637 659
(gms) TD 509 566 568 584 522 561 554 540
25% Elongation
MD 796 824 850 824 789 747 846 858
(gms) TD 586 663 666 688 614 651 641 629
40% Elongation
MD 1037
1023
1073
1023
1000
902 1029
1031
(gms) TD 617 692 691 719 644 685 656 640
Ultimate MD D-882
2180
2006
1955
1898
1868
1461
1727
1461
Stress (gms)
TD 1644
1387
1472
1379
1327
1443
1327
1269
Ultimate MD D-882
350 308 271 306 279 315 335 315
Elongation (%)
TD 755 603 657 607 634 666 660 619
Tear MD D-1922
26 20 29 21 20 23 27 20
Strength (gms)
TD 202 265 279 270 283 322 263 232
Impact MD D-1709
64 70 53 65 <45 <45 <45 <45
Coefficient of (1)
1.08
0.96
0.96
1.02
1.23
0.83
0.83
0.86
Friction (2) 0.57
0.59
0.53
0.64
0.62
0.50
0.53
0.50
__________________________________________________________________________
Example ASTM
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
__________________________________________________________________________
Density (gms/cm.sup.3)
0.936
0.960
0.961
0.952
0.940
0.956
0.959
Gauge (mils) 1.36
1.30
1.15
1.29
1.29
1.31
1.32
Stress at: D-882
5% Elongation MD 317 330 236 298 269 313 342
(gms) TD 277 309 227 273 305 309 342
10% Elongation
MD 637 633 531 595 531 618 660
(gms) TD 555 574 435 538 589 632 637
25% Elongation
MD 846 830 739 788 700 805 859
(gms) TD 650 666 511 628 687 746 749
40% Elongation
MD 1029
1015
938 969 874 770 1033
(gms) TD 667 692 534 649 689 770 776
Ultimate MD D-882
1479
1666
2180
1716
1734
1716
1730
Stress (gms) TD 1447
1110
1139
1110
1505
1681
1423
Ultimate MD D-882
317 300 350 335 341 335 308
Elongation (%)
TD 681 531 648 557 638 691 622
Tear MD D-1922
53 25 19 21 29 41 28
Strength (gms)
TD 281 279 311 285 219 318 271
Impact MD D-1709
53 50 <45 55 69 56 <45
Coefficient of (1) 1.14
0.89
1.06
0.93
0.86
1.01
0.84
Friction.sup.1 (2) 0.55
0.54
0.55
0.56
0.62
0.57
0.50
__________________________________________________________________________
.sup.1 Subsequent to extrusion, the film was passed between a polished
chrome roller and a rubberfaced roller.
(1) refers to the side corresponding to the polished chrome roller and
(2) refers to the side corresponding to the rubberfaced roller.
TABLE 4
__________________________________________________________________________
Film Properties After Eight Days
__________________________________________________________________________
Example ASTM
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
__________________________________________________________________________
5% Elongation
MD 290 437 429 393 407 426 399 605
(gms) TD 427 431 471 420 405 472 461 581
10% Elongation
MD 589 764 756 688 700 724 704 922
(gms) TD 694 706 803 689 667 752 747 890
25% Elongation
MD 736 994 990 909 917 903 894 1050
(gms) TD 753 775 866 760 720 793 795 853
40% Elongation
MD 1037
1215
1220
1112
1143
1047
1041
1156
(gms) TD 763 779 891 768 715 757 759 806
Ultimate
MD D-882
2180
1859
1824
1707
1724
1488
1460
1421
Stress (gms)
TD 1639
1200
1699
1443
1520
1363
1481
1116
Ultimate
MD D-882
350 234 205 254 229 270 270 244
Elongation (%)
TD 720 553 662 649 692 622 655 516
Tear MD D-1922
26
28 33 16 12 23 24 45
Strength (gms)
TD 275 273 295 390 283 330 357 383
Impact MD D-1709
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
__________________________________________________________________________
Example ASTM
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
__________________________________________________________________________
5% Elongation
MD 579 408 308 414 395 520 506
(gms) TD 528 426 323 465 461 454 527
10% Elongation
MD 886 698 550 702 690 830 895
(gms) TD 822 688 547 742 775 732 815
25% Elongation
MD 1011
889 744 899 889 997 1071
(gms) TD 823 747 597 780 859 773 814
40% Elongation
MD 1119
1058
936 1059
1076
1156
1207
(gms) TD 797 745 589 748 862 745 758
Ultimate MD D-882
1341
1550
1352
1549
1701
1561
1583
Stress (gms)
TD 881 1274
1110
1274
1300
1332
1443
Ultimate MD D-882
202 260 204 278 263 240 257
Elongation (%)
TD 417 573 627 573 548 643 642
Tear MD D-1922
12 25 14 37 16 20 24
Strength (gms)
TD 342 336 413 302 289 338 359
Impact MD D-1709
-- -- -- -- -- -- --
__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 5
__________________________________________________________________________
Film Properties After Sixteen Days
__________________________________________________________________________
Example ASTM
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
__________________________________________________________________________
5% Elongation
MD 419 458 423 715 635 516 496 --
(gms) TD 446 438 470 618 618 595 592 --
10% Elongation
MD 746 782 707 1073
980 814 829 --
(gms) TD 722 728 737 875 935 905 910 --
25% Elongation
MD 989 1018
922 1215
1137
977 1000
--
(gms) TD 795 796 792 963 -- 939 943 --
| | |