|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 4947320 Crus 707/201 Aug,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4933848 Haderle 707/201 Jun,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4912669 Iwamoto 715/531 Mar,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4876665 Iwai 707/200 Oct,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4868733 Fujisawa 707/5 Sep,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4864497 Lowry 707/102 Sep,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4827447 Croes 715/530 May,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4816655 Musyck 235/380 Mar,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4811207 Hikita 707/2 Mar,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4807182 Queen 715/511 Feb,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4805099 Huber 707/102 Feb,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4751740 Wright 382/180 Jun,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4713754 Agarwal 707/100 Dec,1987 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4712174 Minkler, II 704/1 Dec,1987 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4674040 Barker 707/200 Jun,1987 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4663615 Hernandez 715/785 May,1987 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4656343 Gerritsen 235/454 Apr,1987 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4631664 Bachman 707/100 Dec,1986 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4611298 Schuldt 707/1 Sep,1986 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4604653 Shimizu 358/403 Aug,1986 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4601003 Yoneyama 715/775 Jul,1986 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4553261 Froessl 382/306 Nov,1985 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4503515 Cuan 715/537 Mar,1985 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4485454 Kimoto 707/3 Nov,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4445195 Yamamoto 707/206 Apr,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4404649 Nunley 235/379 Sep,1983 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4358016 Richardson 209/564 Nov,1982 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4121196 Johnson 382/212 Oct,1978 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application is related in subject matter to the following applications
filed concurrently herewith and assigned to a common assignee:
Application Ser. No. 07/277,385 filed by M. G. MacPhail entitled "Method of
Filing Stapled Documents Within A Context of A Folder".
Application Ser. No. 07/277,387 filed by M. G. MacPhail entitled "Method of
Filing Stapled Documents".
Application Ser. No. 07/277,390 filed by M. G. MacPhail entitled "Method of
Distributing Stapled Documents".
The foregoing copending applications are incorporated herein by reference.
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates to methods of managing documents in an information
processing system and more particularly, to methods of filing stapled
documents in the information processing system within the context of an
application program.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
In recent times, automation of offices is rapidly becoming a reality for an
increasing number of organizations. Office automation helps the
organizations integrate data files with text, store and retrieve
correspondence and reports electronically, distribute documents
electronically and support the day-to-day activities of administrative
personnel, professionals and managers.
While some of the benefits of electronic document processing can be
realized from a single, stand-alone office system, a network which
connects office systems in various locations in the organization increases
the productivity of the organization. Physically, a network is a
combination of interconnected pieces of equipment and programs used for
moving information between points where it may be generated, processed,
stored and used. From the viewpoint of an user of the network, the network
is a collection of services which are useful in creating, revising,
distributing, filing and retrieving documents.
In today's electronic office, documents are physically grouped or stored
using one of the following techniques: partition data sets, directories
and folders. Partition data sets are storage areas on a disk or other form
of storage medium. Documents stored in a partition data set only exist in
that storage area and a partition data set can not be deleted until all of
the documents included therein have been removed. Generally, the documents
are filed in the partition data set in the order created and there is no
other relationship regarding the order to the documents.
Directories are similar to partition data sets in that they are physical
storage areas for documents for files. Documents can not exist in more
that one physical storage area. The documents contained in a directory are
not logically organized.
In regards to both the partition data sets and the directories, if a user
filed a group of documents which are related to a general topic and wanted
to review the group of documents, the user would have to first locate the
partition data set or sets or the directory or directories containing the
documents. In partition data sets and directories, documents have to be
deleted from the bottom up. Additionally, it is very difficult to
rearrange documents stored or grouped using these two techniques. The
documents must be copied and then deleted. Moreover, partition data sets,
except for the contents thereof, can not be distributed. Directories can
not be distributed in their entirety. Linear and hierarchical groupings
can not be distributed using directories or partition data sets because
the groupings mechanism utilized therewith will be lost. This type of
operation technique reduces the efficiency of the electronic office.
Folders are documents which form hierarchical and linear relationship
between a group of documents. Folders can be nested to form the
hierarchical relationship whereby the group of documents within a folder
are ordered to form the linear relationship. The documents within a folder
are organized sequentially by a specified descriptor or by a specified
position number. Access to a folder is independent from the documents
contained therein. Documents within a folder can be manipulated as a
single document, as a set of documents which comprise the entire folder or
as a set of documents which comprise a specified level of the folder
document.
A folder can be used to form a directed or one-to-one relationship between
two documents. This requires the folder to be a first document and a
document contained therein to be a second document. The relationship
suffers in that not all documents are folders and if any other documents
are entered into the folder, the one-to-one relationship between the first
and the second document becomes unclear.
The use of partitioned data sets and directories in establishing directed
relationships between two documents suffers from limitations which are
similar to those as a result of using a folder. There is no way to
identify which document is coupled to another, when more than two
documents are included in a partitioned data set or directory, the
one-to-one relationship is lost and the forms of grouping documents
requires the creation of a new folder, directory or partition to establish
the relationship.
Consequently, what is needed is a technique for establishing a directed
relationship between documents without creating additional documents or
groups.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to methods of establishing a directed relationship
between at least two documents stored in an information processing system
within the context of an application program. An end user indicates to the
system that a staple relationship is to be created between at least two
identified documents stored in therein. The staple relationship is then
defined by entering an indication that the staple relationship is
restricted to the application program, a name of the application,
stapler/staplee attributes of the at least two documents including whether
or not history is to be maintained and pointers to the physical locations
of the at least two documents in the system. In response to the entry of
the data defining the staple relationship, an add or file request is
transmitted to a library server along with copies of any documents which
are not filed in a library. The server then sets data objects associated
with the identified documents to reflect the staple relationship.
Thereafter, the server files the identified documents into the library as
specified by the staple relationship defined by the end user.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a document management system in accordance
with the principles of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a model of a document showing the various objects associated with
a document stored in the system of FIG. 1.
FIGS. 3 through 6 are object structures which are employed in establishing
a staple relationship within a context of an application.
FIGS. 7 through 9 are various flow charts illustrating detailed steps of
the method of the present invention.
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
FIG. 1 shows a document management system 10 which controls the creation,
retrieval, editing and distribution of documents within an information
processing system. Moreover, the document management system 10 enables an
end user (EU) to file a pair of documents in the system 10 which are
coupled together in a stapled relationship within the context of an
application. In essence, a stapled pair of documents to be filed consists
of documents copied from the EU's local storage, the server's storage or a
combination of both. Thus, the EU creates the staple relationship by
interacting with a dialogue manager application 14 providing the data
which is necessary to establish the staple relationship between the pair
of documents. The necessary data includes addressing information for
access control, contextual-search characteristics, requester/principle
identifiers and a definition of the stapled pair of documents. The
definition of the stapled pair includes an indication that a document is
stapled by another document and pointers to the physical location of all
of the documents to be filed. These documents can be directly accessible
to the requester application 16 or they can be directly accessible to the
requester's server 18. After the dialogue manager application 14 has
gathered the above-identified information, it transmits the information to
the requester application program 16.
The requester application application program 16, in response to input from
the dialogue manager application 14, builds an add or a file request and
transmits the request to the requester's server 18. The file request is
built when at least one of the documents specified in the request to be a
part of the staple relationship is not stored in a library 12. The add
request is built when all of the documents specified in the request are
stored in the library 12. The requester application program 16 makes a
copy of each of the locally accessible documents identified by the EU
which are stored in a local storage medium 20. The copies of the documents
are transmitted to the requester's server 18 along with the request.
Additionally, the requester application program 16 transmits pointers to
the physical location of all of the documents identified in the request
which are stored in the library 12 and not otherwise identified by the
folder document containing the documents.
The requester's server 18 files the stapled documents into the library 12
as specified in the file request. The appropriate staple relationship will
be established and maintained as specified in the file or add request.
The document management system 10 shown in FIG. 1 utilizes a uniform
structure for exchanging information within the system. This structure
includes an encoding scheme which is designed to convey any document,
irrespective of it content, from one type of office system to another and
to communicate the intent of the person creating or transmitting a
document as to the method of processing thereof. One type of structure
which meets all of these requirements is the Document Interchange
Architecture (DIA) which is a part of a DISOSS office system marketed by
the International Business Machines Corporation.
DIA is a program-to-program communication architecture which defines the
protocols and data structures that enable programs to interchange
information such as documents and messages in a consistent and predictable
manner. DIA is independent of the type of information managed by DIA
services. DIA includes document objects which contain parameters or
descriptors that describe the contents of the information being
transmitted. The descriptors contained in the objects include the name
under which the information is filed, the authors, the subject of the
information and the date the information was filed in the document
history. These descriptors enable a document to be searched in a storage
medium such as the server library 12.
The server library 12 performs various services for the system 10. These
services are used for storing and retrieving documents electronically.
Whenever a document is filed in the server library 12, a set of
descriptors called a document profile is filed with it. The profile
contains the descriptors noted above. Document profiles are used in
searching for documents in the library 12. For purposes of illustration
and not limitation, a EU can ask the system 10 to search for all documents
regarding a particular subject and by a certain author which was filed in
the library 12 between any two dates. Upon completing the search, the
system presents the EU with a list of the documents which meet the search
criteria. The EU could then ask the system 10 to retrieve a copy of a
specific document on the list from the library an deliver the copy the EU
for printing or viewing.
The server library 12 also provides the following services: file documents
in and retrieve or delete documents from the library; update work in
progress documents in the library; specify a security level to associate
with the document that is being filed; allow authorized end users other
than the EU who filed the document to retrieve the document from the
library and perform searches for and retrieve documents in the library for
other end users. The server library 12 assigns each new document filed in
therein a unique name called a library-assigned document name (LADN). This
name is returned to the requester and can be used to uniquely identify the
document at some later time.
Referring to FIG. 2, each document stored in the server library 12 includes
the objects shown therein. All of the objects shown in FIG. 2 are created
in response to the processing a FILE command. A document model object
contains information concerning ownership and attributes of a specific
document. This object controls the access to the document during its life
in the library.
An original owner object contains or points to information used by an owner
of the document to control access to the document as filed.
A document content object provides for the storage of the document content
and for saving information relating to the actual size of the filed
document.
A document relation object describes the logical relationships between the
document and other documents. If the document is a folder, each of the
documents contained therein has a pointer or LADN entry in this object. If
this document is in one or more folders, then each folder has a pointer or
LADN entry in this object. Enter and remove history may be maintained for
the document either as a folder or as a document in other folders.
An access control model object is created when the document owner
authorizes other users to access the document.
Structures for all of the above-identified objects except document
relations object (DRO) are a part of the DISOSS office system and will not
be described herein. Every document stored in system 10 has a document
relations object associated therewith. FIG. 3 shows the structure of the
DRO which consists of the following: an attribute parameter set, a folder
document parameter set, a document-within-a-folder (DIF) parameter set, a
staplee parameter set and a stapler parameter set.
The attribute parameter set indicates whether or not the document
associated with the DRO is a folder or whether or not the document is a
`folder-only` document. Additionally, the attribute parameter set
indicates whether or not in a stapled relationship the associated document
is designated as a "staplee" or as a "stapler" with respect to another
document. A staplee document is a document which is stapled by another
document. A stapler document is a document which is stapled to another
document. FIG. 4 illustrates the structure for the attribute parameter
set. A folder attribute indicates whether or not the document associated
with the document relation object is a folder. If the document is a
folder, then a folder section parameter set is required. A DIF (document
in folder) attribute indicates whether or not the document is contained
within any folders. A folder-only attribute indicates whether or not the
document can be viewed as existing on its own when it is included within a
folder. Documents are viewed as folder-only when both the DIF and
Folder-only attributes are positively set.
A physical document in a physical folder is a folder-only document. In
essence, the physical document exists in the folder and can not stand on
its own. However, electronic documents can logically exist in multiple
places at the same time. Therefore, a document can appear to be in more
than one folder and standing on its own all at the same time. Whether or
not the document can stand on its own when it is also in a folder is
indicated by the folder-only attribute. Folder-only documents are viewed
as stand-alone when they are not contained by any folders.
The staplee attribute indicates whether or not the document associated with
the DRO is a stapled by another document. The stapler attribute indicates
whether or not the document associated with the DRO is stapled to another
document.
FIG. 5 illustrates the structure for the staplee section parameters. The
staplee parameters associated with the DRO is defined as a repository for
information specific to a document stapled by another document. The
staplee parameters are created when the document associated with the DRO
is stapled by another document. The staplee parameters are preserved with
the document until the document is deleted from a document library or the
document is unstapled by its last document. The attributes parameter
allows for the specification of a history option when the document is
stapled and unstapled by another document. The history option determines
the maintenance of a related document parameter set associated with the
document. The related document parameter set is either deleted when the
document is unstapled by another document and maintained when the document
is stapled by another document. Alternatively, the related document
parameter set is maintained when the document is unstapled by another
document. The request date, time and requester's identification are added
to the related document parameter set. When the document is restapled by
the same document, the new staple date, time and the requester's
identification are added to the related document parameter set.
The related document parameter set includes the following: a related
document parameter introducer, the LADN of the document by which the
document is stapled, a user-assigned document name of the other document,
the context in which this document was stapled by the other document, the
date and time this document was stapled by the other document, the
identification of the staple requester, and the date and time the document
was unstapled and the identification of the unstaple requester if the
history option is specified.
FIG. 6 illustrates the structure for the staplee related document
subparameters. The stapler LADN is a unique name assigned to the other
document by the server library when the other document was filed in the
library. The document name parameter identifies the other document by its
user-assigned name. The context parameter set specifies the context in
which this document is stapled by the other document: the context can be
all folders, a set of folders, an application, or a set of applications.
The other document can appear in more than one folder. The context
parameter can be used to specify in which folders this documen | | |