|
|
|
| United States Patent | 5140332 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/5140332.html |
| Inventor(s) | Martin; Raymond G. (Ellicott City, MD);
Hill; Gregory S. (Columbia, MD) |
| Abstract | A radar system is disclosed which includes a transmitter which produces a
long coded radar pulse. The return of the long coded radar pulse is
compressed by a long pulse compression filter to produce a short coded
pulse and the short coded pulse is compressed by a short pulse compression
filter to produce a return pulse for processing by an existing processor
designed to process return coded pulses of a particular format. The long
pulse transmitter can also transmit a short coded precursor pulse, to
improve radar range coverage, along with the long coded pulse by the
provision of a switching bypass device which routes the short coded pulse
return signal around the long pulse compression filter. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing from US Patent 5140332 |
|
|
Short pulse radar system with a long pulse transmitter |
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
August 18, 1992 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
October 25, 1991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parent Case |
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 07/379,404,
filed Jul. 13, 1989, now abandoned. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 4
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5036328 Nakamura 342/204 Jul,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4983979 McKenzie 342/204 Jan,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4914441 Brookner 342/161 Apr,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4894660 Thomson 342/129 Jan,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4885590 Hasan 342/196 Dec,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4875050 Rathi 342/195 Oct,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4847624 Hopwood 342/201 Jul,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4839655 Kiuchi
Jun,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4739186 Crookshanks 307/106 Apr,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4719468 Jehle 342/201 Jan,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4698827 Kretschmer 375/332 Oct,1987 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4670755 Gellekink 342/194 Jun,1987 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4626855 Rouse 342/201 Dec,1986 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4620112 McPherson 327/199 Oct,1986 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4616232 Reits 342/379 Oct,1986 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4562438 Rouse 342/201 Dec,1985 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4524361 Teulings 342/201 Jun,1985 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4490720 Kuntman 342/195 Dec,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4404562 Kretschmer, Jr. 342/194 Sep,1983 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4347513 Schindler 342/13 Aug,1982 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4293856 Chressanthis 342/93 Oct,1981 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4216433 LeGrand 327/37 Aug,1980 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4153900 Novak 342/201 May,1979 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4142189 Gleason 342/109 Feb,1979 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4137532 Taylor, Jr. 342/93 Jan,1979 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4136341 Mulder 342/160 Jan,1979 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4101889 Evans 342/93 Jul,1978 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4099182 Ward 342/93 Jul,1978 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4096478 Chavez 342/132 Jun,1978 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4053884 Cantrell 342/109 Oct,1977 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3968490 Gostin 342/93 Jul,1976 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
|
|
|
| Market Size |
|
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market
sector:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Market Share |
|
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Reasonable Royalty |
|
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
|
| | |
| |
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
|
| Market Size | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Market Share | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Reasonable Royalty | N/A | [No votes] |
| | N/A | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Technical Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
We claim:
1. A radar system, comprising:
a long pulse transmitter transmitting a long encoded transmit pulse, having
a first coded internal structure, to produce a long pulse return signal;
first pulse filtering means for compressing the long pulse return signal
into a short coded return pulse which is shorter than the long pulse
return signal, and having a second coded internal structure different than
the first coded internal structure of the long encoded transmit pulse;
second pulse filtering means for compressing the short coded return pulse;
and
signal processing means for processing the compressed coded return pulse to
produce a radar indication.
2. A radar system as recited in claim 1, wherein said first pulse filtering
means comprises a surface acoustic wave filter.
3. A radar system as recited in claim 1, further comprising processing
means for performing hard limiting constant false alarm rate processing of
the coded return pulse.
4. A radar system as recited in claim 1, wherein said first and second
pulse filtering means comprise one of a frequency domain digital filter, a
time domain digital filter and a combination of a frequency domain digital
filter and a time domain digital filter.
5. A radar system as recited in claim 1, further comprising:
precursor means for causing said transmitter to transmit a short encoded
precursor pulse associated with the encoded transmit pulse to produce a
short encoded precursor return signal; and
bypass means for applying the short encoded pulse precursor return signal
to said second pulse filtering means and bypassing the said first pulse
filtering means.
6. A radar system as recited in claim 5, wherein the short encoded
precursor pulse if transmitted ahead of the encoded transmit pulse by a
least the length of the encoded transmit pulse.
7. A radar system as recited in claim 5, wherein the short encoded
precursor pulse has a first frequency and the encoded transmit pulse has a
second frequency different from the first frequency and the short encoded
precursor pulse and the encoded transmit pulse are transmitted
concurrently.
8. A radar system, comprising:
a long pulse transmitter transmitting a long encoded transmit pulse, having
a first coded internal structure, to produce a long return signal;
first pulse filtering means for compressing the long return signal into a
short coded return pulse shorter than the long return signal, and having a
second coded internal structure different than the first coded internal
structure of the encoded transmit pulse;
signal processing means for performing hard limiting constant false alarm
rate processing on the short coded return pulse; and
second pulse filtering means for compressing the hard limited false alarm
rate processed short coded return pulse.
9. A radar system, comprising:
a signal processor for compressing a short coded return pulse of a
predetermined format having a first internal coded structure to produce a
radar indication;
a transmitter for producing a long encoded pulse having a second internal
coded structure different than the first internal coded structure of said
short coded return pulse and having a first length longer than a second
length of said short coded return pulse; and
processing means for compressing a returned long encoded pulse into the
short coded return pulse of the predetermined format.
10. A radar system, comprising:
a transmitter producing a first short coded pulse in association with a
long coded pulse to produce a first short coded return pulse and a long
coded return pulse where the first short coded pulse has a first internal
coded structure different than a second internal coded structure of the
long coded pulse and the first short coded return pulse has a first length
shorter than a second length of the long coded return pulse;
a long pulse compression filter compressing the long coded return pulse
into a second short coded return pulse having the encoding of the first
short coded pulse;
switching means for switching the first short coded return pulse to bypass
said long pulse compression filter;
a short pulse compression filter compressing the first and second short
coded return pulses; and
a signal processor processing the first and second compressed short coded
return pulses to produce a radar indication. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present application is directed to a radar system in which a
solid-state, long radar pulse transmitter is used with a short coded pulse
radar processor and, more particularly, to a system in which a long pulse
compression filter is provided in the receiver to convert the long pulse
into the short pulse expected by the signal processor allowing retrofit of
existing radar systems with the more reliable solid-state transmitters or
to the design of a system in which hard limiting constant false alarm rate
processing is desired.
2. Description of the Related Art
Many existing radars, such as the TPS-70 available from Westinghouse, use
tube transmitters to generate, and a processor designed to process,
relatively short coded radar pulses. A pulse is generally considered a
short pulse when the length is from around 1 to around 10 microseconds.
However, there is increasing interest in modifying the short pulse designs
to use solid-state transmitters for which long pulse transmissions are
more appropriate, so that reliability can be increased while taking
advantage of the particular capabilities of the short pulse systems. A
pulse is generally considered a long pulse when the pulse length is
greater than about 50 microseconds. Long pulse waveforms, as are
appropriate to solid-state transmitters for long or medium range, low
pulse repetition frequency, surveillance radars, typically are of
sufficient length (for example, 100 microseconds or more) that the only
waveforms which have sufficient doppler tolerance for the target radial
speeds of interest are linear FM or some form of closely related
non-linear FM. An exception may be low frequency, for example, VHF or UHF,
radars, for which biphase or quadriphase long coded waveforms may have
sufficient doppler tolerance. However, existing radars using tube
transmitters typically use short coded pulse waveforms, such as the 6.5
microsecond quadriphase coded pulse used in the TPS-70 radar. These
existing radars typically employ digital pulse compression by
convolutional methods and, as in the TPS-70 case, also frequently take
advantage of the waveform code structure to employ hard limiting type
constant false alarm rate (CFAR) processing. A conventional approach to
signal processing for long pulses, appropriate to solid-state transmitter
type waveforms would likely involve major signal processor changes which
possibly would include the incorporation of Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) -
Inverse Fast Fourier Transform (IFFT) pulse compression producing a short
unencoded pulse from the long encoded pulse and cell averaging CFAR into
the processor algorithms.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to use solid-state transmitters in
short pulse radar systems.
It is another object of the present invention to allow existing radar
systems to be retrofitted with solid-state transmitters.
It is an additional object of the present invention to provide a more
reliable radar system.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a system which
will operate with both long and short radar pulses.
It is also an object of the present invention to provide a long pulse
system that is capable of using constant false alarm rate processing.
It is an object of the present invention to provide short range coverage in
a long pulse system.
The above objects can be attained by a system in which a solid-state, long
pulse radar transmitter is provided along with both a long pulse
conversion filter and a short pulse compression filter in the receiver.
The long pulse filter converts a long return pulse into the shorter pulse
expected by the short pulse compression filter and existing processor. To
allow both long and short pulses to be used a bypass switch is provided to
route short return pulses around the long pulse filter.
These together with other objects and advantages which will be subsequently
apparent, reside in the details of the construction and operation as more
fully hereinafter described and claimed, reference being had to the
accompanying drawings forming a part hereof, wherein like numerals refer
to like parts throughout.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 illustrates a conventional radar system using a tube type, short
pulse transmitter 12;
FIG. 2 illustrates a radar system with a long pulse, solid-state
transmitter 40 in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 2A illustrates the components of filter 44 in FIG. 2;
FIGS. 3a and 3b compare the radar pulse sequence of the systems of FIG. 1
and FIG. 2;
FIG. 4 illustrates the components of a digital embodiment of the system
illustrated in FIG. 2;
FIG. 5 illustrates the signal processing performed by the pulse compression
signal processor 70 of FIG. 4 in the frequency domain; and
FIG. 6 illustrates the components necessary for processing the radar signal
by a discrete component pulse compression signal processor 70 as
illustrated in FIG. 4 in the time domain.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Prior to discussion of the operation and structure of the present
invention, the components of a conventional radar system that uses a short
pulse will be discussed with respect to FIG. 1. A conventional frequency
generator 10 produces a short coded waveform specified by the system
designer which is amplified and output by the tube type, short pulse
transmitter 12. A duplexer 14 applies the signal to an antenna 16 which
broadcasts the signal toward a target. The signal reflected from the
target impinges on the antenna 16 and is routed to a conventional mixer 18
which conventionally uses a local oscillator to demodulate the received
signal. An IF amplifier 20 applies the demodulated signal to a
conventional analog short pulse compression filter 22, such as a surface
acoustic wave filter, which is designed to convert the return pulse which
is typically approximately 6.5 microseconds long to a pulse which is 0.5
microseconds long, a 13 to 1 compression ratio. The compressed pulse is
then applied to a conventional phase detector 24 and video amplifier 26
and then converted into a digital signal sample by an analog-to-digital
converter 28. A signal processor 30 performs conventional signal
processing on the digitized signal and provides a radar indication, that
is, a display or target location information.
Equivalently, the pulse compression function of filter 22 could be
accomplished digitally, in which case the digital compression function
would typically be performed after the signal processing function and the
analog short pulse compression filter would be omitted. The reason for
performing the final pulse compression after the signal processing
function is that a non-linear type of pulse compression known as Coded
Pulse Anti-Clutter System (CPACS) available from Westinghouse provides an
economical way to combine the pulse compression with a CFAR processing
function and, because CPACS processing is non-linear in nature, it must be
placed after the linear signal processing function, otherwise it would
degrade the performance of such typical signal processor Doppler
processing functions as Moving Target Indicator (MTI) processing that are
used to remove or reduce the effects of ground clutter return signals.
The basic idea of the present invention is to transmit a linear FM,
non-linear FM chirp, or other coded long pulse of a bandwidth
corresponding to the range resolution of the digital signal processor 30
and to employ a filter (for example, a surface acoustic wave device) in
the receive chain to convert the received signal that would return from a
point target into a second and different specific coded waveform for which
the signal processor 30 is designed. For example, for the TPS-70 signal
processor, the desired converted received signal would be a 6.5
microsecond quadriphase coded pulse (a complex pulse with coding of the
internal structure of an individual pulse), regardless of the length and
coding of the actual transmitted pulse. In the conversion of the
transmitted pulse to the second pulse range side lobes will exist on the
second coded pulse output of the long pulse compression filter, however,
the transmitted pulse filter can be designed to drive these side lobes to
almost any desired level with respect to the desired coded output pulse
using well known mismatched filter design techniques. The following
discussion assumes that a chirp pulse preferably 130 microseconds long is
being transmitted, although it will be recognized by those of ordinary the
art that other long coded pulse waveforms could be used in low frequency
radars for which such codes have sufficient doppler tolerance for the
range of the target radial speeds of interest. The following discussion
will, for the purpose of simplicity, also discuss the filtering of the
present invention as a series combination of two filters when the filter
designer of ordinary skill would likely produce a single filter with an
equivalent response of the cascaded filters.
As illustrated in FIG. 2, as an example of one possible implementation of
the invention, a conventional frequency generator 38 generates the desired
long coded pulse and provides the pulse to a conventional long pulse,
solid-state transmitter 40. As in the conventional system described with
respect to FIG. 1, the pulse is transmitted through a duplexer 14 and
antenna 16 to be reflected off the target and demodulated by a
conventional mixer 42 and conventional IF amplifier 20. The return signal
is then applied to a long pulse compression filter 44 designed to compress
the return signal to the form expected by the conventional short pulse
compression filter 22. For example, the filter 44 would compress a 130
microsecond 2 megahertz bandwidth FM chirp return pulse to a 6.5
microsecond pulse. The short pulse compression filter 22 supplies the
signal to the phase detector 24 and thereon to the signal processor 30. To
illustrate the design features that must be incorporated in filter 44, it
is convenient to implementation of filter 44 to describe filter 44 as a
series combination of two separate filters. As illustrated in FIG. 2A, the
first of these two filters is a conventional pulse compression filter 56
for the transmitted pulse, and for the above example of a transmitted wave
form consisting of a 2 megahertz bandwidth linear FM chirp, the pulse
compression filter 56 would convert the 130 microsecond return signal into
a compressed pulse of approximately 0.5 microseconds in length. The second
of the two filters 58 is a conventional encoder filter having an impulse
response such that when excited by a 0.5 microsecond pulse produces an
output waveform 6.5 microseconds in length encoded with the phase code
expected by the short pulse compression filter (the internal structure of
the pulse) 22. Since the present invention is using linear filters, the
same result can be obtained if the two filters 56 and 58 are cascaded in
reverse order or if a single filter is formed having equivalent response
characteristics.
Design methods are well known for chirp or other coded pulse compression
filters such as the pulse compression filter 44 which have controlled
range lobe characteristics. To obtain either a single long pulse
compression filter 56 or a combined filter which performs the functions of
filters 56 and 58, the radar system architect provides a description of
the coded 6.5 microsecond pulse and the desired long pulse to a filter
designer of ordinary skill who uses a conventional filter design program
to produce the layout of an analog filter, such as a surface acoustic wave
(SAW) filter for pulses less than 100 microseconds in length and a
reflective dot array SAW filter for longer pulse lengths, which will
perform the functions of either filter 56 or the combination of filters 56
and 58. Appropriate SAW filters can be obtained from Westinghouse or
Racal-Mesl of Scotland.
Because monostatic radars are normally unable to receive while they are
transmitting, they are generally unable to respond to targets at ranges
shorter than that corresponding to a round trip time equivalent to the
transmitted pulse length (for example 8 miles in the case of a 100
microsecond pulse). Because the receiver must be turned off while the long
pulse is being transmitted, the range of the radar system retrofitted with
a solid-state transmitter 40 is changed as compared to the range of the
short pulse system with the tube the transmitter 12. That is, the mixer 42
can be turned on earlier in a short pulse system and, thus, a short pulse
radar system is capable of detecting and tracking targets that are closer
to the antenna 16.
To overcome the above-discussed drawback and allow operation at shorter
ranges, a second embodiment of the present invention also illustrated in
FIG. 2 can be used to transmit a short precursor pulse of one frequency
followed by a long pulse of a different frequency. In this modified system
during short pulse transmission a switch 46 connects a local oscillator 48
of a first frequency to the generator 38 to produce a short pulse of a
corresponding frequency. As soon as the pulse has been transmitted the
mixer 42 is activated and uses the same frequency generator 38 to
demodulate the return signal. During the receive period for the returns of
the short pulse, switch 54 is set to route the short pulse returns around
the long pulse compression filter 44. Once the time period for the desired
range of the short pulse has expired, the switch 46 is toggled to a local
oscillator 52 which causes the frequency generator 38 and transmitter 40
to produce a long pulse. At the same time the switch 46 applies the same
long pulse local oscillator signal to the mixer 42. During receipt of the
long pulse the switch 54 is set to pass the return signal to the long
pulse compression filter 44. The same solid-state transmitter 40 can be
used for both the short pulse and the long pulse because the energy
content of the short range pulse, even though lower than the long pulse,
is sufficient to provide coverage for the limited range extent for which
it is required. The energy of the short and long pulses should be selected
so that the returns are within the maximum range of the receive circuits
such as by making the peak power of the pulses the same. The benefit of
this approach of transmitting a short precursor pulse, prior to the
transmission of each long pulse, using different transmit frequencies for
the short precursor and long chirp pulses, and encoding the precursor
pulse with the short pulse waveform expected by the signal processor 30 is
that the long pulse system can b | | |