WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Selective chemical vapor deposition of tungsten for microdynamic structures    
United States Patent5149673   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/5149673.html
Inventor(s)MacDonald; Noel C. (Ithaca, NY); Chen; Liang-Yuh (Ithaca, NY); Zhang; Zuoying L. (Ithaca, NY)
AbstractA selective chemical vapor deposition (CVD) tungsten process is used to fabricate three-dimensional tungsten cantilever beams on a substrate. Two beams form micromechanical tweezers that move in three dimensions by the application of potential differences between the beams, and between the beams and the silicon substrate. A high deposition rate selective tungsten CVD process is used to fabricate beams of greater than 3 micrometers thickness in patterned, CVD silicon dioxide trenches ion-implanted with silicon. Tweezers 200 micrometers in length with a cross section of 2.7 by 2.5 micrometers will close upon application of a voltage of less than 150 volts.



 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History
Drawing from US Patent 5149673
Selective chemical vapor deposition of tungsten for microdynamic

     structures - US Patent 5149673 Drawing
Selective chemical vapor deposition of tungsten for microdynamic structures
Inventor     MacDonald; Noel C. (Ithaca, NY); Chen; Liang-Yuh (Ithaca, NY); Zhang; Zuoying L. (Ithaca, NY)
Owner/Assignee     Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. (Ithaca, NY)
Patent assignment
All assignments
Publication Date     September 22, 1992
Application Number     07/762,492
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     September 19, 1991
US Classification     438/611 216/2 438/52 438/702
Int'l Classification     H01L 021/283
Examiner     Quach; T. N.
Assistant Examiner    
Attorney/Law Firm     Jones, Tullar & Cooper
Address
Parent Case     This is a divisional of copending application Ser. No. 07/313,206, filed on Feb. 21, 1989, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,072,288, issued Dec. 10, 1991.
Priority Data    
USPTO Field of Search     437/203 437/192 437/182 437/195 437/245 437/24
Patent Tags     selective chemical vapor deposition tungsten microdynamic structures
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
3039897



[0 after 0 votes]
3641373



[0 after 0 votes]
3672985



[0 after 0 votes]
3769531



[0 after 0 votes]
5057450
Bronner
438/412
Oct,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
4983535
Blanchard
438/270
Jan,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
4959515
Zavracky
200/181
Sep,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4956619
Hornbeck
359/317
Sep,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4906840
Zdeblick
250/306
Mar,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4835585
Panousis
257/332
May,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4805033
Nishikawa
358/3.1
Feb,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4789803
Jacobsen
310/309
Dec,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4788158
Chatterjee
438/212
Nov,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4776924
Delapierre
438/52
Oct,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4772928
Dietrich
257/254
Sep,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4754185
Gabriel
310/309
Jun,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4746621
Thomas

May,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4706374
Murakami
438/52
Nov,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
4697118
Harnden, Jr.
310/331
Sep,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
4654555
Ohba
310/332
Mar,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
4570139
Kroll
335/187
Feb,1986

[0 after 0 votes]
4517486
Andrews
310/331
May,1985

[0 after 0 votes]
4516148
Barth
257/735
May,1985

[0 after 0 votes]
4381672
O'Connor
73/504.15
May,1983

[0 after 0 votes]
4348650
Minagawa
333/195
Sep,1982

[0 after 0 votes]
4319397
Tanabe
438/51
Mar,1982

[0 after 0 votes]
4203128
Guckel
331/156
May,1980

[0 after 0 votes]
4011144
Bachman
438/611
Mar,1977

[0 after 0 votes]
3835338
Martin
310/331
Sep,1974

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


What is claimed is:

1. A method of forming a microdynamic structure, comprising:

forming on a top surface of a substrate wafer a first dielectric layer; forming a second layer of silicon dioxide on a top surface of said first layer to produce a composite dielectric wafer;

patterning and etching said composite dielectric wafer to produce at least one channel in said wafer, said channel extending partially through said second layer and having a bottom wall in said silicon dioxide layer, the bottom wall being spaced above said top surface of said first layer;

implanting silicon in said silicon dioxide bottom wall of said channel;

selectively depositing a refractory metal in said channel to fill said channel;

depositing an isolation mask on said first layer to and on said refractory metal to mask said refractory metal in said channel;

etching said silicon dioxide layer in the region surrounding at least a part of said metal-filled channel to produce a cavity and to free said metal to provide a cantilever beam extending into said cavity.

2. The method of claim 1, further including removing said isolation mask.

3. The method of claim 2, further including applying a thin film layer of insulating material on said beam.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein the step of patterning and etching produces two spaced channels, whereby two cantilever beams are produced in said cavity.

5. The method of claim 4, further including applying an electrical potential across said beams to produce an electrostatic force therebetween for mechanical deflection of said beams.

6. The method of claim 2, further including applying an electrical potential between said beam and said substrate to produce an electrostatic deflection force on said beam.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the step of applying an electrical potential includes applying a step voltage to said beam.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of depositing a refractory material includes chemical vapor deposition of tungsten, said tungsten seeding on said implanted silicon in said channel.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the step of patterning and etching includes forming a third layer of silicon nitride on the top surface of said second layer, said third layer forming a mask for said channel.

10. A method of forming a microdynamic structure comprising:

providing a wafer including an insulating layer covered by a tungsten seeding layer:

depositing a layer of silicon dioxide on said tungsten seeding layer;

etching through said layer of silicon dioxide at least one elongated channel having a bottom wall formed by said tungsten seeding layer, said channel serving as a mold for formation of said microdynamic structure;

selectively depositing tungsten by chemical vapor deposition in said channel, said tungsten seeding in said channel on said bottom wall of said channel and filling said channel to form an elongated tungsten structure in said silicon dioxide layer; and

selectively removing a portion of said silicon dioxide layer surrounding said tungsten-filled channel to form a cavity around at least a part of said tungsten structure to release said structure and to form a cantilever tungsten beam extending into said cavity.

11. The method of claim 10, further including applying an electrical insulator to the surface of said beam.

12. The method of claim 10, wherein the step of forming a cavity further includes removing said seeding layer from within said cavity.

13. The method of claim 10, further including applying a conformal coating of an electrically insulating oxide to surfaces of said beam.

14. The method of claim 10, further including applying conformal coating of silicon dioxide to surfaces of said beam.
 Description Submit all comments and votes
 


The present invention relates, in general, to a process for producing microdynamic structures and to the structures produced by that process, and more particularly is directed to the fabrication of three-dimensional tungsten cantilever beams on a substrate.

The field of micro-electromechanical systems is a new, emerging technology which has as its goal the integration of electronic circuits, sensors, and electromechanical motion devices to build complete electromechanical systems on a micrometer scale. Recent research interest in such system has focused on the fabrication of microactuators and micromotors which have applications as micromechanical positioners, robotic actuators, and microprobes. Recent research has shown that rotating and sliding structures can be fabricated using modified silicon processing. To date, research emphasis has been directed toward the fabrication of movable microstructures using polycrystalline silicon with sacrificial layers which, upon removal, releases the microstructures for motion. One disadvantage of the present technology is that the deposition of only relatively thin layers of polysilicon are practical, and thus the silicon micromechanical structures are usually planar structures that are not easily extended to three dimensions. Furthermore, these structures are fragile and require many process steps to create a movable, free structure.

Silicon-based electrostatic actuators and electrostatic motors are crucial to the construction of integrated micro-electromechanical systems. However, attempts to achieve motion in microdevices have been impeded by the complexity of the processes required to build three dimensional structures, and by the forces that make materials stick together upon contact, to impede or prevent relative motion. Four major challenges to the production of a working micro motor have been identified as being the control of friction and wear; the control of surface charges and interfacial forces; the development of a process that produces movable parts; and the control of stress, especially in the movable parts. The first two challenges require considerable experimental research to measure and identify the controlling parameters, while the third and fourth challenges are very closely related since a movable structure must conform to a designed shape, whereas stress plays a major role in distorting a structure when it is released from a mold.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed, in general, to a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) tungsten/silicon process for fabricating movable structures for electrostatic actuators and motors. The movable actuator is fabricated on a suitable substrate such as a silicon chip, with careful attention being given to production of a structure which permits measurement of friction, stress, and electrostatic forces to enable the production of a stress-free device capable of mechanical motion under the control of applied electrostatic voltages.

Thin films several micrometers in thickness can be deposited using chemical vapor deposition processes. Both CVD silicon dioxide and CVD tungsten processes have been developed with deposition rates of greater than 1,000 angstroms per minute. As described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,746,621 of David C. Thomas et al, assigned to the assignee of the present application, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, a selective tungsten on silicon process has been developed for producing patterned integrated circuit metal layers. This process uses patterned CVD silicon dioxide trenches which are ion implanted with silicon to make patterned tungsten microstructures. In accordance with that patent, the CVD tungsten seeds only on the silicon implanted at the bottom of the trenches, and continues to grow vertically while filling the trenches from wall to wall. No anisotropic tungsten etch is required to produce high aspect ratio tungsten structures in accordance with that process.

The present invention is an extension of the selective tungsten CVD process described in the aforesaid U.S. Pat. No. 4,746,621 to produce stress-free cantilever beams that can be deflected using applied electric fields. In accordance with this process, a pair of beams form the arms of microtweezers which can be deflected in both the X-Y plane, which is the plane of the two beams and which preferably is parallel to the plane of the substrate, and in the Z direction perpendicular to the substrate plane, by the application of potential differences between the tweezer arms or between the tweezer arms and the substrate, respectively. The application of such potential differences produces motion in the tweezer arms which is a function of the time during which the potentials are applied and which is a function of the magnitude of such potentials.

In accordance with a preferred form of the process of the present invention, a layer of low pressure CVD silicon dioxide is applied to a wafer coated with a thin silicon nitride layer, the latter layer serving to ensure insulation between the substrate and the tungsten beams produced by the process. A thin silicon nitride layer is deposited as an implantation mask on the top of the silicon dioxide layer and the mask is patterned to obtain vertical resist profiles. The channels for the tungsten beams are then formed in the silicon dioxide layer by reactive ion etching. After the photoresist is removed, silicon atoms are implanted in the bottom of the channels. Thereafter, the silicon nitride mask is removed and a tungsten film is selectively deposited to fill the implanted oxide channels. An isolation mask is applied to etch the oxide surrounding the tungsten channels to thereby free the tungsten beams. In a preferred form of the invention, the beams are then covered with a conformal coating of CVD silicon dioxide to provide a thin insulating layer on the beams.

Although the substrate preferably is silicon or gallium arsenide, it will be apparent that any substrate that can receive the thin silicon nitride and the CVD silicon dioxide layers can be used. The silicon or gallium arsenide substrates are preferred, however, when the microtweezers are to be incorporated into electronic circuitry such as VLSI circuits.

In a modified version of the invention, the channels are formed in an oxide layer which is formed over a polysilicon layer, which in turn is formed on the thin silicon nitride layer on the wafer. The channels expose the polysilicon layer, which then acts to seed the CVD tungsten which is deposited to form the tungsten beams. The cavity formed around the beam exposes the nitride layer under the beams to free them, as before, with the nitride layer remaining as an insulator on the top surface of the substrate.

In a still further modification of the invention, the substrate may be a silicon wafer formed by a Simox process, wherein a silicon substrate is covered by a thin layer of silicon dioxide which in turn is covered by a thin layer of silicon. This commercially available wafer is then covered by an oxide layer such as CVD silicon dioxide, and trenches are formed therein, as discussed above. These trenches extend down to the thin layer of silicon, so taht CVD tungsten will seed in the trenches without the need for ion implantation. A cavity is then formed around the beams to release them, as previously described.

The tungsten beams are extensions of the tungsten microcircuit conductors formed in a silicon dioxide layer, and extend in cantilever form from the silicon dioxide layer into the formed cavity. The beams are elongated and are substantially square in cross-section, and extend substantially parallel to the floor of the cavity. Upon application of a potential across the beams, the beams move toward or away from each other, while application of a potential difference between a beam and the substrate will cause the beam to move toward or away from the substrate.

In carrying out the foregoing process, tungsten beams have been fabricated having a length of 200 micrometers, a height of 2.7 micrometers and a width of 2.5 micrometers. Such beams have been moved in a controlled manner by the application of selected voltages.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing and additional objects, features and advantages of the invention will become apparent to those of skill in the art from a consideration of the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of tungsten beams forming microtweezers in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic top view of the tweezers of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a side view of the tweezers of FIG. 1;

FIG. 4 is an end view of one of the tweezer beams of FIG. 2;

FIG. 5 is a graphical depiction of the free end deflection of one tweezer arm as a function of the applied voltage between the tweezer arms of FIG. 1;

FIG. 6 is a graphical depiction of forced density distributions along the length of one tweezer arm;

FIG. 7 is a graphical depiction of the dynamic beam deflection as a function of time for one tweezer arm;

FIG. 8 is graphical depiction of the dynamic beam deflection as a function of position for one tweezer arm and for time;

FIGS. 9 through 15 illustrate the steps in a process of fabricating the tweezer of FIG. 1; and

FIGS. 16-20 and 21-25 illustrate the steps in alternative fabrication processes.

DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Turning now to a more detailed consideration of the present invention there is illustrated in FIG. 1 a segment 10 of a microcircuit incorporating a pair of three-dimensional cantilever beams 14 and 16 fabricated from a material such as tungsten in accordance with the present invention. The microcircuit is formed on a substrate or base 18 which in a preferred form of the invention is a silicon or a gallium arsenide wafer, but which may be any material capable of receiving an insulating layer 20 of, for example, silicon nitride. A layer of CVD silicon dioxide 22 covers the layer 20, with the beams 14 and 16 being formed in a cavity 24 created in the silicon dioxide layer. The beams are embedded in the silicon dioxide layer 22 at their near ends 26 and 28, respectively, and extend outwardly in a cantilever fashion from one face 29 of the cavity 24 with their far, or free ends 30 and 32, respectively, being suspended in the cavity and above the bottom surface 34 thereof. The beams 14 and 16 lie in a common X-Y plane which may be parallel to the surface 34 and are free to move in this plane and in a Z direction perpendicular to the X-Y plane. The near ends of the beams 26 and 28 are formed as a part of, and thus are connected to, metal circuit connector lines 36 and 38, respectively, in the illustrated embodiments. These circuit lines may lead, for example, to external contacts or other circuit components for supplying voltages to the respective beams 14 and 16 to thereby actuate the beams in a manner to be described. The two beams 14 and 16 in the illustrated embodiment can be moved toward and away from each other upon application of appropriate voltages between the beams, and accordingly can perform the function of microtweezers. In one form of the invention, the beams may be formed of material exhibiting piezoelectric characteristics, so that motion of the beams by externally applied forces results in the generation of electrical signals which can be detected by the microcircuit to which the beams are connected.

As illustrated in FIGS. 2, 3 and 4, the beams are generally rectangular in cross section and are capable of deflection through an angle .theta., with the deflection occurring over the full length L of the beam, and with the total motion away from the initial position defined by axis x being identified in FIG. 4 by u(x). In FIG. 2 this deflection is shown in the X-Y plane, but it will be apparent that a similar deflection can also be produced in the Z direction. In one form of the invention, the length L may be 200 micrometers, the width w of the beam may be about 2.5 micrometers, and the height h of the beam may be about 2.7 micrometers.

The beams 14 and 16 are rigidly fixed at their inner ends at cavity wall 29, which coincides with the axis y diagrammatically illustrated in FIG. 2, but are free to deflect over their entire length L. When a step function potential difference is applied between the arms 14 and 16, as by applying potentials to the lines 36 and 38, an attracting or repelling electrostatic force occurs between the charged arms, depending on the polarity of the potential. The arms act as electrodes, so the tweezers can be mathematically modeled as an air gap capacitor, and the distance between the two arms, d(x, t), is given by the following equation:

d(x,t)=d.sub.0 +2u(x,t), (Eq.1)

where u(x, t) is the deflection of one arm away from the x axis, at any given position x along the tweezer arm, and where the potential is supplied to the arms for a time t greater than 0. The spacing between the tweezer arms 14 and 16 is illustrated at d.sub.0 in FIG. 1 and in FIG. 2. The total capacitance density, c(x, t), along the two arms 14 and 16 is the combination of the fringing capacitance and the plate capacitance, and is given by the following equation: ##EQU1## where .epsilon..sub.0 is the dielectric constant between the tweezer arms and h is the height of the tweezer arm, as indicated above. Equation 2 is an approximate expression to account for the fringing capacitance.

The force density F(x, t), per unit length along one of the arms due the attraction of the other arm is given by the following equation: ##EQU2##

Since the total deflection of the tweezer arm at the free end thereof is made much smaller than its length, the Euler-Bernoulli beam equation, including the damping and external forcing terms for each arm, is given by the following equation: ##EQU3## where E is the Young's modulus for tungsten; M=.mu.mw is its mass density per unit length: .mu. the volume mass density; I=h w.sup.3 /12 is its moment of inertia; and P is the damping coefficient.

In order to solve the equation for the deflection of the tweezers in the dynamic case, the partial differential equation 4 is replaced by a set of difference equations using the central difference scheme. The scheme is explicit and is stable when the temporal increment is sufficiently small compared with the spatial increment. In the static case, the time dependent terms vanish, and the resulting ordinary differential equation can be replaced by a set of algebraic equations.

In order to determine when the free ends of the tweezer arms 14 and 16 will touch in response to an applied potential, the deflection of tips 30 and 32 for different applied voltages may be simulated, with the results of such simulations being illustrated in FIG. 5. In this Figure, curve 40 illustrates the free end deflection of one tweezer arm as a function of the applied voltage between the two tweezer arms. As illustrated, for an applied voltage slightly above 112 volts, the deflection of the arm becomes unstable, and the tweezers close abruptly.

FIG. 6 illustrates the force density distribution along one arm of the tweezers due to an applied voltage of 112 volts. Curve 42 illustrates the density distribution at time t=0 upon application of a step function input of 112 volts, while curve 44 illustrates the force density distribution at time t=infinity. As illustrated by these curves, initially when the tweezers arms are fully opened, the force density of attraction decreases along the length of the arm. However, when the arms are deflected toward each other, the force density decreases. For an applied voltage greater than 112 volts, the forced density increases rapidly and the two arms close.

FIG. 7 illustrates the dynamic beam deflection of one tweezer arm as a function of time and for positions along the beam upon application of a step input of 112 volts. Curves 46, 48, 50 and 52 illustrate the response at four points along the arm, where X=80, 120, 160 and 200 micrometers, respectively. In this case, the free ends touch at x=L=200 micrometers. At other positions along the length of the tweezers the arms may collide and bounce back and forth, exhibiting decaying vibrations. The dynamic response approaches a steady state after a short time. The damped responses are slower than the ones for the undamped case. The free ends for the undamped case exhibit increased vibrational motion.

FIG. 8 shows the dynamic beam deflection as a function of the position for one tweezer arm over a period of time upon application of a step function of 112 volts. Curves 54, 56, 58 and 60 show the spatial shapes of the tweezer arms for times t=0, 8, 15 and 20 microseconds, respectively. As illustrated in this Figure, the two arms will deflect and touch within 20 microseconds.

The foregoing simulations illustrated in FIGS. 5, 6, 7 and 8 are for voltages applied between the tweezer arms 14 and 16 or between one arm and a nearby, horizontally spaced electrode, to produce motion in the X-Y plane parallel to surface 34. In similar manner, the arms 14 and 16 can be deflected in a vertical direction by application of a suitable potential between a tweezer arm and a vertically spaced electrode such as the substrate 18. It has been found that the voltage required to cau