|
|
|
| United States Patent | 5196694 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/5196694.html |
| Inventor(s) | Berthold; John W. (Salem, OH);
Reed; Stuart E. (Homeworth, OH) |
| Abstract | A temperature compensated, self-referenced fiber optic microbend pressure
transducer employs a fiber optic loop (90) to compensate for thermal
offset of the microbend sensor output. In the preferred emb
This invention was made with Government support under Contract No.
NAS3-25796 awarded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
The Government has certain rights in this invention. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing from US Patent 5196694 |
|
|
Temperature compensated self-referenced fiber optic microbend pressure
transducer |
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
March 23, 1993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 4932263 Wlodarczyk 73/705 Jun,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4932262 Wlodarczyk 73/705 Jun,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4930862 Miers 385/13 Jun,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4915468 Kim 385/28 Apr,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4891511 Reed 250/227.16 Jan,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4860586 Miers 73/514.26 Aug,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4853534 Dakin 250/227.17 Aug,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4733933 Pikulski 385/12 Mar,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4724316 Morton 250/227.14 Feb,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4714829 Hartog 250/227.14 Dec,1987 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4703175 Salour 356/45 Oct,1987 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4681395 Lindsay 385/12 Jul,1987 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4600836 Berthold, III 250/231.19 Jul,1986 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4589286 Berthold, III 73/715 May,1986 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4577100 Meltz 250/227.18 Mar,1986 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4500204 Ogura 356/318 Feb,1985 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4487206 Aagard 600/480 Dec,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4436995 Whitten 250/227.16 Mar,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
|
|
|
| Market Size |
|
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market
sector:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Market Share |
|
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Reasonable Royalty |
|
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
|
| | |
| |
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
|
| Market Size | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Market Share | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Reasonable Royalty | N/A | [No votes] |
| | N/A | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Technical Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed is:
1. A temperature compensated, self-referenced fiber optic sensor,
comprising:
a pair of plates with corrugated surfaces having facing and offset teeth,
at least one of said plates being in contact with a parameter to be
sensed;
a first signal optical fiber clamped between said corrugated plates for
being bent to a greater or less extent depending on a parameter exerted on
said corrugated plates;
a second reference optical fiber located adjacent said plates to be exposed
to a similar environment, said second reference optical fiber being formed
in a loop with at least one turn and secured to itself by at least one
point with securing means, said optical fiber loop having a predetermined
radius r constructed to produce a controlled degree of microbending loss
for mode conversion to compensate for thermal offset in addition to cable
and connector offsets and light source fluctuations;
a light source for supplying light to said signal and reference optical
fibers; and
optical detecting means for receiving light from said signal and reference
optical fibers, said optical detecting means measuring changes in
transmitted light therethrough for determining a sensed parameter, said
optical detecting means further including light transmission determining
means for measuring a change in transmission in said reference fiber to
compensate for thermal offset in the sensed parameter.
2. A temperature compensated, self-referenced fiber optic sensor,
comprising:
a pair of plated with corrugated surfaces having facing and offset tooth,
at least one of said plates being in contact with a parameter to be
sensed;
a first signal optical fiber clamped between said corrugated plates for
being bent to a greater or less extent depending on a parameter exerted on
said corrugated plates, said signal fiber having an optical fiber loop
situated past said corrugated plates, said optical fiber loop having a
predetermined radius r with at least one turn and secured to itself with
securing means, said optical fiber loop being constructed to produce a
controlled degree of microbending loss for mode conversion to compensate
for thermal offset;
a second reference optical fiber located adjacent said plates to be exposed
to a similar environment;
a light source for supplying light to said signal and reference optical
fibers; and
optical detecting means for receiving light from said signal and reference
optical fibers, said optical detecting means measuring changes in
transmitted light therethrough for determining a sensed parameter, said
optical detecting means further including light transmission determining
means for measuring a change in transmission in said reference fiber to
compensate for thermal offset in the second parameter.
3. A fiber optic sensor as recited in claim 1, further comprising:
a second light source for supplying light at a second wavelength
.lambda..sub.2 together with said first light source supplying light at a
first wavelength .lambda..sub.1, said light at the first wavelength
.lambda..sub.1 being supplied to said signal optical fiber and said light
at the second wavelength .lambda..sub.2 being supplied to said reference
optical fiber; and
optical detecting means including at least two photodetectors for receiving
light intensities at the two wavelengths from said signal and reference
fibers to produce corresponding output signals, and optical detecting
means further receiving light intensities directly from said first and
second light sources to provide source signals at both wavelengths, said
optical detecting means comparing said output signals with source signals
to determine the sensed parameter.
4. A fiber optic sensor as recited in claim 2, further comprising:
a second light source for supplying light at a second wavelength
.lambda..sub.2 together with said first light source supplying light at a
first wavelength .lambda..sub.1, said light at the first wavelength
.lambda..sub.1 being supplied to said signal optical fiber and said light
at the second wavelength .lambda..sub.2 being supplied to said reference
optical fiber; and
optical detecting means including at least two photodetectors for receiving
light intensities at the two wavelengths from said signal and reference
fibers to produce corresponding output signals, said optical detecting
means further receiving light intensities directly from said first and
second light sources to provide source signals at both wavelengths, said
optical detecting means comparing said output signals with source signals
to determine the sensed parameter.
5. A fiber optic sensor, as recited in claim 1, wherein said reference
fiber includes a delay coil to create a separation in time of light
intensity, said light source being pulsed to provide pulses of light for
separation.
6. A fiber optic sensor, as recited in claim 2, wherein said reference
fiber includes a delay coil to create a separation in time of light
intensity, said light source being pulsed to provide pulses of light for
separation.
7. A fiber optic sensor, as recited in claim 5, wherein said optical
detecting means provides a ratiometric measurement of signal fiber
intensity to reference fiber intensity based upon time domain intensity.
8. A fiber optic sensor, as recited in claim 6, wherein said optical
detecting means provides a ratiometric measurement of signal fiber
intensity to reference fiber intensity based upon time domain intensity.
9. A temperature compensated, self-referenced fiber optic sensor,
comprising:
a pair of plates with corrugated surfaces having facing and offset teeth,
at least one of said plates being in contact with a parameter to be
sensed, one plate of said pair of plates being positioned centrally on a
diaphragm which deflects in proportion to a pressure difference, said
other plate being opposite and offset thereof, said diaphragm being
circumferentially sealed inside a cap and body;
a first signal optical fiber clamped between said corrugated plates for
being bent to a greater or less extent depending on a parameter exerted on
said corrugated plates;
a second reference optical fiber located adjacent said plates to be exposed
to a similar environment, said second reference optical fiber being formed
in a loop with at least one turn and secured to itself by at least one
point with securing means, said optical fiber loop having a predetermined
radius r constructed to produce a controlled degree of microbending loss
for mode conversion to compensate for thermal offset in addition to cable
and connector offsets and light source fluctuations;
a light source for supplying light to said signal and reference optical
fibers; and
optical detecting means for receing light from said signal and reference
optical fibers, said optical detecting means measuring changes in
transmitted light therethrough for determining a sensed parameter, said
optical detecting means further including light transmission determining
means for measuring a change in transmission in said reference fiber to
compensate for thermal offset in the sensed parameter.
10. A fiber optic sensor as recited in claim 9, wherein said cap includes
an aperture for producing a vacuum within the body.
11. A fiber optic sensor as recited in claim 10, wherein said body includes
a greater for absorbing outgassed and in-diffused gases for maintaining
the vacuum.
12. A temperature compensated, self-referenced fiber optic sensor,
comprising:
a pair of plates with corrugated surfaces having facing and offset teeth,
at least one of said plates being in contact with a parameter to be
sensed;
a first signal optical fiber clamped between said corrugated plates for
being bent to a greater or less extent depending on a parameter exerted on
said corrugated plates;
a second reference optical fiber located adjacent said plates to be exposed
to a similar environment, said second reference optical fiber being formed
in a loop with at least one turn and secured to itself by at least one
point with securing means, said optical fiber loop having a predetermined
radius r constructed to produce a controlled degree of microbending loss
for mode conversion to compensate for thermal offset in addition to cable
and connector offsets and light source fluctuations;
a light source for supplying light to said signal and reference optical
fibers; and
optical detecting means for receiving light from said signal and reference
optical fibers, said optical detecting means measuring changes in
transmitted light therethrough for determining a sensed parameter, said
optical detecting means further including light transmission determining
means for measuring a change in transmission in said reference fiber to
compensate for thermal offset in the sensed parameter, said optical fiber
loop including one end of the optical fiber forming the loop having
reflecting means at or near the point of being secured, said reflecting
means reflecting light supplied to the optical fiber back to said optical
detecting means.
13. A fiber optic sensor as recited in claim 3, wherein said optical
detecting means provides a ratiometric measurement of signal fiber
intensity to reference fiber intensity based upon wavelength domain
intensity.
14. A fiber optic sensor as recited in claim 4, wherein said optical
detecting means provides a ratiometric measurement of signal fiber
intensity of reference fiber intensity based upon wavelength domain
intensity.
15. A temperature compensated, self-referenced fiber optic sensor,
comprising:
a pair of plates with corrugated surfaces having facing and offset teeth,
at least one of said plates being in contact with a parameter to be
sensed, one plate of said pair of plates being positioned centrally on a
diaphragm which deflects in proportion to a pressure difference said other
plate being opposite and offset thereof, said diaphragm being
circumferentially sealed inside a cap and body;
a first signal optical fiber clamped between said corrugated plates for
being bent to a greater or less extent depending on a parameter exerted on
said corrugated plates, said signal fiber having an optical fiber loop
situated past said corrugated plates, said optical fiber loop having a
predetermined radius r with at least one turn and secured to itself with
securing means, said optical fiber loop being constructed to produce a
controlled degree of microbending loss for mode conversion to compensate
for thermal offset;
a second reference optical fiber located adjacent said plates to be exposed
to a similar environment;
a light source for supplying light to said signal and reference optical
fiber; and
optical detecting means for receiving light from said signal and reference
optical fibers, said optical detecting means measuring changes in
transmitted light therethrough for determining a sensed parameter, said
optical detecting means further including light transmission determining
means for measuring a change in transmission in said reference fiber to
compensate for thermal offset in the sensed parameter.
16. A fiber optic sensor as recited in claim 15, wherein said cap includes
an aperture for producing a vacuum within the body.
17. A fiber optic sensor as recited in claim 16, wherein said body includes
a getter for absorbing outgassed and in-diffused gases for maintaining the
vacuum.
18. A fiber optic sensor as recited in claim 2, wherein said optical fiber
loop includes one end of the optical fiber forming the loop having
reflecting means at or near the point of being secured, said reflecting
means reflecting light supplied to the optical fiber back to said optical
detecting means.
19. A fiber optic sensor as recited in claim 12, wherein said reflecting
means includes a silicon film deposited on one end of the optical fiber
forming the loop. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates in general, to fiber optic sensors, and in
particular, to a temperature compensated self-referenced fiber optic
microbend pressure transducer.
2. Description of the Related Art
Numerous applications exist for pressure measurement in high-temperature
environments. These applications include pipe line pressure in
petrochemical refineries, gas path pressure in aircraft engines and main
steamline pressure in turbine generators. Traditional diaphragm type
pressure transducers are not suited for these high-temperature
applications for several reasons. First, the diaphragm material may creep
and cause output offset error. Second, the strain or capacitance gages
used to measure diaphragm deflection exhibit large non-repeatable and
unpredictable changes in gauge outputs at temperatures greater than
300.degree. C. These changes are caused by such effects as alloy
segregation, phase changes, selective oxidation, and diffusion.
Ultimately, they lead to premature failure of the gage or lead-wire.
One attempt to eliminate the effects of diaphragm creep and hysteresis used
dimensionally stable fused silica or other ceramic for the diaphragm
material. Another attempt to enable measurement of diaphragm deflection at
high temperatures employed fiber optic sensors with a fused silica optical
fiber.
While there are several fiber optic sensors available for sensing diaphragm
deflection, most of these sensors have been configured for dynamic
applications such as the detection of acoustic signals. Since pressure
changes occur over long periods of time in most process applications,
pressure transducers and manometers must be designed to measure static or
dc pressure. Consequently, it is desirable that these devices have low
drift and insensitivity to environmental changes other than pressure, for
example, temperature.
In addition, there are practical problems associated with the design of
fiber optic sensors to operate at elevated temperatures with adequate
sensitivity within a transducer configuration exhibiting low drift and
environmental insensitivity.
Microbend sensors exhibit zero offset as a function of temperature. The
zero offset causes an apparent error in applications such as pressure
transducers where the fiber optic microbend sensor is used to measure
diaphragm deflection. It is known that microbend sensor offset is a
linear, repeatable function of temperature. Thus, it is desirable that an
independent, linear fiber optic measurement of temperature provide a
signal which could be subtracted from the microbend sensor to provide a
simple method for compensation of temperature offset.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention solves the aforementioned problems with the prior art
as well as others by providing a temperature compensated, self-referenced
fiber optic sensor.
The temperature compensated, self-referenced fiber optic sensor comprises a
pair of plates with corrugated surfaces having facing and offsetting
teeth. At least one of the plates is in contact with a parameter to be
sensed or measured. A signal optical fiber is clamped between the
corrugated plates so that when the parameter applies a force thereon, it
causes a change in separation of the plates and microbending of the signal
fiber. At least one reference optical fiber is located in a similar
environment to be exposed to the same conditions. The reference optical
fiber is formed in a loop with a predetermined radius to compensate for
thermal offset. A light source supplies light to the fibers and optical
detecting means receives the light and measures the changes in light
intensity for determining the sensed parameter. The change in light
transmission in the reference fiber compensates for thermal offset in the
sensed parameter.
One embodiment of the present invention employs wavelength division
multiplexing where light at two different wavelengths is propagated
through a common fiber and then separated so that one wavelength is
propagated through the sensor fiber and the other wavelength through the
reference fiber. After passing through the sensor, the light is combined
in an output fiber and later separated at the optical detecting means. The
optical detecting means includes photodetectors for comparing light
intensities of the two wavelengths with source signals directly from the
light source.
The preferred embodiment of the present invention uses time domain
intensity normalization. In this embodiment the reference fiber includes a
delay line to create a separation in time between light intensity pulses
traveling in the sensor and reference fibers.
The present invention advantageously employs a first optic loop for
temperature compensation. The fiber optic loop may be incorporated
directly in the reference fiber or it may be serially connected to the
sensor optical fiber so that the slope change due to temperature
compensates the slope of thermal offset in the microbend sensor.
Accordingly, one aspect of the present invention is to provide an optical
fiber loop temperature sensor to compensate for thermal offset.
Another aspect of the present invention is to provide a temperature
compensated, self-referenced fiber optic sensor.
Still another aspect of the present invention is to provide a temperature
compensated self-referenced fiber optic microbend pressure transducer.
A further aspect of the present invention is to provide a fiber optic
sensor which is simple in design, rugged in construction, and economical
to manufacture.
The various features of novelty which characterize the present invention
are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed to and forming a
part of this disclosure. For a better understanding of the present
invention, its operating advantages and specific objects attained by its
use, reference is made to the accompanying drawings and descriptive matter
in which the preferred embodiments of the invention are illustrated.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a sectional view of a fiber optic pressure transducer;
FIG. 2(a) is an exploded cross-sectional view of the preferred embodiment
of a temperature compensated, self-referenced fiber optic pressure
transducer;
FIG. 2(b) is an assembled view of FIG. 2(a);
FIG. 3 is a close-up view of the microbend sensor employed in FIGS. 1, 2(a)
and 2(b);
FIG. 4 is a graph of sensitivity versus tooth pitch illustrating optimum
corrugation spacing;
FIG. 5 is a graph of applied load versus displacement using corrugated
sensor plates;
FIG. 6 is a graph of measured microbend sensor output voltage versus
displacement at ambient temperature;
FIG. 7 is a graph of calculated diagram deflection versus pressure with 27N
point load at center of diaphragm;
FIG. 8 is a schematic representation of an embodiment of the present
invention employing time domain referencing;
FIGS. 9(a) and 9(b) are graphs showing transmitted intensity and received
intensity employing time domain referencing;
FIG. 10 is a schematic representation of another embodiment employing
wavelength division multiplexing;
FIG. 11 is a schematic illustration of the signal processing employed in
the embodiment depicted in FIG. 10;
FIG. 12 is a schematic representation of the optical fiber loop temperature
sensor;
FIGS. 13(a) and 13(b) depict different fiber loop geometries;
FIG. 14 depicts a single ended fiber optic loop;
FIG. 15 is a calibration curve for a 4.8 dB loop;
FIG. 16 depicts typical pressure response of a microbend fiber optic
transducer at two different temperatures;
FIG. 17 is a plot of throughput (dB) versus temperature over the
temperature range of -60.degree. C. to 80.degree. C.; and
FIG. 18 is a calibration curve for a silicon etalon temperature sensor.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Referring to the drawings, and FIG. 1 in particular, there is shown a
diaphragm pressure transducer containing a fiber optic microbend sensor
(2). These transducers use a microbend fiber optic sensing principle where
a multimode step-index optical fiber (10) with a buffer coating is
squeezed between a pair of plates (12, 14) with corrugated surfaces having
facing and offsetting teeth (16). One of the plates (12) is positioned
approximately at the center of a diaphragm (18) which deflects in
proportion to a pressure exerted upon it. This deflection causes a change
in the amplitude for the periodic distortion of the optical fiber (10)
squeezed between plates (12, 14). Optical light transmitted through the
optical fiber (10) is attenuated in proportion to the amplitude of these
mechanical distortions (microbends).
Thus, measurement of the change in transmitted light provides a signal
proportional to pressure applied to the diaphragm (18).
In FIG. 1, the transducer consists of a 1.4 mm. thick, 12.7 mm. diameter
diaphragm (18) fastened to a cylinder (4) with bolts (6). The cylinder (4)
is fastened to a flange (3) by welds (5). This assembly is designed to be
inserted directly into a high pressure pipeline (not shown) which contains
a mating flange. Pressure seals (7, 9) ensure a tight fit. The transducer
diaphragm (18) and cylinder (4) are made from a high strength steel super
alloy such as Inconel (a Registered Trademark of The International Nickel
Company, Inc.). This alloy is chosen because of its low creep at high
temperatures and the relative ease in machining this material compared to
fused silica.
Next, referring to FIG. 2, there is shown another embodiment of the
microbend pressure transducer.
Diaphragm (18) is sealed around its circumference by suitable means such as
an electron beam weld to a cap (20) and a body (22). The body (22) has a
step-bored cavity (24) for receiving the diaphragm (18), and the second
plate (14) which may be affixed by any suitable means such as a post (26)
with bellows (28) circumferentially surrounding the post (26) immediately
below plate (14). A second aperture (30) in the side of the body (22) in
communication with the first aperture (24) allows for a getter (32) and a
plug (34). Openings (36, 38) allow the optical fiber to enter the body
(22) and are sealed with Torr Seal vacuum epoxy commercially available
through Varian Associates. Protection tubes (40) may be employed to
protect and secure optical fiber (10) as it enters the body (22). An
opening (42) in cap (20) allows introduction of the unknown pressure to
the assembled transducer. The volume surrounding the microbend sensor and
bellows is evacuated to create a vacuum with opening (30) being plugged
thereafter. The getter (32) absorbs outgassed and in-diffused gases to
ensure that a vacuum reference is maintained for extended time periods
behind the diaphragm (18). This embodiment provides an absolute pressure
reference.
The multi-mode step index optical signal fiber (10) is clamped between a
pair of plates (12, 14) as best seen in FIG. 3. The first plate (12) is
located at approximately the diaphragm (18) center and the second plate
(14) is positioned on a fixed reference surface of the transducer body
such as post (26). When a pressure is applied to the flexible diaphragm
(18), the optical fiber (10) is spatially deformed into a sinusoidal
shape. The deformation induces loss in the optical fiber (10) proportional
to an applied pressure. The loss sensitivity may be optimized by matching
the sinusoidal deformation period to the difference between the
propagation constants of adjacent modes in the optical fiber (10). The
power loss from the core to radiation modes is optimum when the fiber
spatial-bend frequency equals the difference in propagation constants
(.DELTA.B) between propagating and radiation modes as follows:
##EQU1##
where: .LAMBDA. is the corrugation spacing. For step index fibers,
.DELTA..beta. is given by the following formula:
##EQU2##
where: a=the fiber core radius
m=the mode number
M=the total number of modes
.DELTA.=(n.sub.core -n.sub.clad)/n.sub.clad
The higher-order modes are preferentially coupled to adjacent higher-order
modes and radiation modes by the periodic distortion applied to the fiber
by the corrugations. For these higher-order modes the mode number is about
equal to the total number of modes, and by combining Equations, 1 and 2,
the optimum corrugation spacing is calculated as follows for a fiber with
0.15 mm core and 0.18 mm clad diameters.
##EQU3##
Although the result in Equation 3 is close to the optimum value, the
corrugation spacing providing best sensitivity for a 0.15 mm core diameter
fiber has been found to be about 0.15 mm, as shown in FIG. 4.
FIG. 5 shows the applied load versus displacement measured using corrugated
sensor plates that apply two spatial bends to the optical fiber. The
spring constant is the slope of the curve in FIG. 5. For small changes,
the displacement changes linearly with load.
FIG. 6 plots the inverted sensor output voltage signal versus displacement.
The electronics bandwidth employed was 100 Hz. This microbend sensor
calibration curve was generated using a piezoelectric transducer (PZT)
(driven at 100 Hz) and corrugated plates similar to those in the sensor.
The PZT was in turn calibrated using a Brown and Sharpe displacement gage
whose calibration is traceable to the National Bureau of Standards. The
piezoelectric transducer retracts with applied voltage at 20 nm/volt. It
is apparent from FIG. 6 that the microbend sensor output signal is linear
with displacement over almost four orders of magnitude. The plotted signal
voltage is directly proportional to light intensity transmitted through
the optical fiber squeezed between the corrugated plates (12, 14).
The graph in FIG. 7 is the calculated deflection of a 12.7 mm diameter, 1.4
mm thick diaphragm (18) versus applied pressure with a 27N point load at
the diaphragm center. The 27N point load is a non-critical value and
represents a typical preload on the optical fiber (10). The calculation
represents the configuration diagrammed in FIG. 1. The deflection W.sub.r
is given by the following formula:
##EQU4##
where: .mu.=Poisson's ratio
E=Young's modulus
t=diaphragm thickness
a=diaphragm radius
q=pressure load
Q is the force due to compression of the optical fiber with a preload
(L.sub.o =27N) according to the following equation:
Q=-[(W.sub.T -W')K+L.sub.o ] (5)
where:
K=fiber spring constant
W'=diaphragm deflection at q=0
FIGS. 4-7 provide sufficient information to analyze and predict the
performance of the microbend sensor with the following assumptions:
a) two periodic distortions of fiber;
b) spring constant as calculated from FIG. 5;
c) a light-emitting diode light sensor with a nominal output wavelength of
830 nm;
d) 100 .mu.W of optical power (P.sub.o) propagating in unloaded fiber;
e) 27N static load (L.sub.o) on fiber at diaphragm center; and
f) 53% static light transmission (T.sub.o) caused by static load.
The values of preload and quiescent light transmission are noncritical
because of the extremely wide sensor linearity range (see FIGS. 5 and 6).
These values chosen for calculation below are typical, but vary with
machining tolerances on transducer parts and mating surfaces. Since the
light transmission, T, is log linear with displacement, .DELTA.h (FIG. 6),
and the displacement is linear with applied pressure, q (FIG. 7), the
light transmission is log linear with applied pressure. The change in
light transmission, .DELTA.T, with displacement is expressed as follows:
##EQU5##
From FIG. 7, deflection .DELTA.h is 10 .mu.m at 22.8 MPa full-scale
pressure, and resolves 0.1% of full scale in a 1 Hz electrical bandwidth.
This corresponds to a minimum detectable displacement of 10 nm.
Substituting the appropriate value into Equation 6, as follows:
##EQU6##
The static load causes a static loss in optical power (P) given by:
P=P.sub.o T.sub.o =53 .mu.W (8)
Thus, the minimum detectable power is (combining Equations 7 and 8):
.DELTA.P.sub.min =P.DELTA.T/T.sub.o =3.5 nW (9)
Silicon photodiodes are available with two to three orders magnitude better
noise equivalent power (NEP) and linear dynamic range than what is
required. In addition, there is ensured shot-noise-limited operation with
53 .mu.W of background light level. Consequently, the microbend sensor
signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) is more than adequate to achieve excellent
diaphragm deflection resolution and dynamic range.
Compensation of the microbend sensor is performed to ensure that
temperature, vibration, and light level changes do not introduce errors.
To compensate the microbend sensor, one of two self-referencing methods is
employed in addition to a fiber optic loop for temperature compensation.
Microbend fiber optic pressure transducer outputs may be dc coupled and
errors are introduced by random changes in coupling loss when fiber optic
connectors are mated, demated, and remated. This random loss results in
output signal offset, which can be zeroed out with an adjustment
potentiometer in the electronics. However, if cable bending results in
similar random offsets, the magnitude of these offsets could lead to
random unknown errors. To eliminate these potential offset errors, time
domain or wavelength referencing methods are employed.
The time domain referencing preferred embodiment is depicted in FIG. 8.
Light from a pulsed source (44) is transmitted to a sensor head (46)
containing a fiber optic intensity sensor (48) such as a microbend
pressure sensor, delay coil (50) and 2.times.2 power splitter (52). Each
input light pulse is divided at the splitter (52) between the sensor tap
(54) and the delay coil tap (56) acting as the reference fiber. The ends
of the taps are mirrored (58, 60). If the round trip time through the
delay coil (50) is long enough, the received light pulses from the sensor,
I.sub.S, and delay coil, I.sub.R, will be separated in time as shown in
FIG. 9. Any cable bending or connector mating and demating introduce
offsets which affect the received pulses similarly. Thus, a ratiometric
measurement I.sub.S /I.sub.R provides an output signal free of any cable
or connector dependent offsets, and free of errors due to fluctuations in
the average light level from the source.
The wavelength referencing embodiment is shown in FIG. 10. It uses two
light sources operating at different wavelengths (.lambda.1 and
.lambda.2). With the dual wavelength approach, the light intensities at
each wavelength are combined into a common fiber (66), which travels to
the sensor (68) and directly to the detectors (82). A diffraction grating
or wavelength division multiplexor (WDM) (70) separates the wavelengths
between the signal and reference fibers (72, 74), respectively, in the
sensor head (68). The signals are recombined by combiner (76) into an
output fiber (78). At the signal pr | | |