|
|
|
| United States Patent | 5206706 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/5206706.html |
| Inventor(s) | Quinn; William E. (Middlesex Boro, NJ) |
| Abstract | Alignment method and procedure for accurately determining the off-normal
angle of incidence of an optical beam with a sample, for example, in
ellipsometry. A diffraction grating is fabricated with a grating period
chosen such that, when a laser beam irradiates the grating placed at the
sample area, a beam is diffracted generally along the incoming laser beam.
The laser is then angularly moved with respect to the grating until the
two beams are auto-collimated, i.e., made coincident. The angle of
incidence is then accurately determined from the laser wavelength and the
grating period through well known equations. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing from US Patent 5206706 |
|
|
Alignment of an ellipsometer or other optical instrument using a
diffraction grating |
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
April 27, 1993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed is:
1. A method of aligning an optical instrument, comprising the steps of:
irradiating along a first axis a diffraction grating having a grating
period of d with an incident beam of light having a wavelength .lambda.,
thereby diffracting along a second axis at least an n-th order diffracted
beam from said grating, n being an integer greater than zero; and
auto-collimating said n-th order diffracted beam with said incident beam,
wherein said first and second axis are made to be substantially
coincident, whereby an angular orientation between said incident beam and
said grating is established, thereby determining an angle of incidence
between said incident beam and said grating at said established
orientation.
2. A method as recited in claim 1, wherein n is equal to 2.
3. A method as recited in claim 2, wherein said irradiating step includes
observing a first-order diffracted beam while moving said incident beam.
4. A method as recited in claim 1, wherein said auto-collimating step
comprises the steps of:
observing a separation between said incident beam and said n-th order
diffracted beam; and
changing said angular orientation until said separation disappears.
5. A method as recited in claim 1, further comprising the step of placing
said diffraction grating at a sample area within an ellipsometer before
the step of irradiating the diffraction grating.
6. A method as recited in claim 5, further comprising substiting a
narrow-bandwidth light source for a light source of said ellipsometer,
said narrow-bandwidth light source producing said incident beam.
7. A method as recited in claim 1, wherein said angle of incidence is
determined according to the equation
##EQU3##
8. An ellipsometer system, comprising:
an ellipsometer including an ellipsometric light source for irradiating a
sample area with an optical beam at an angle of incidence .phi..sub.i ;
and
a diffraction grating having a grating period d disposed at said sample
area, wherein
##EQU4##
wherein n is a positive integer and .lambda. is a wavelength of light
emitted by a narrow-bandwidth light source physically substitutable for
said light source in said ellipsometer.
9. An ellipsometer system as recited in claim 8, wherein, a laser emitting
light at said wavelength .lambda. is said narrow-bandwidth light source. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates generally to optical measuring devices, such as
ellipsometers. In particular, the invention relates to the optical
alignment of such devices.
BACKGROUND ART
Aspnes and the present inventor disclosed an ellipsometer in U.S. Pat. No.
5,091,320, and incorporated herein by reference. This highly sensitive
ellipsometer allows the characterization of the composition of a
semiconductive thin film as it is being grown in a closed deposition
chamber. As illustrated in the schematic illustration of FIG. 1, the thin
film is grown on a substrate 10, usually a semiconductor wafer, held on a
substrate holder 12 located inside the enclosed growth chamber. If the
growth process is molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) or organo-metallic
molecular beam epitaxy (OMMBE), the growth chamber is a vacuum chamber 14
held at fractions of a torr. Two viewing ports 16 and 18 are disposed at
about 70.degree. on either side of the surface normal 20 of the substrate
holder 12. Low-strain optical windows 22 in the viewing ports 16 and 18
provide optical access to the growing thin film. A viewing port 24 with
its own window is usually located on the surface normal 20. The
ellipsometer of Aspnes and Quinn includes a light source 26 outputting a
beam along an incident axis 28, an entrance iris 30, a rotatable input
polarizer 32, a rotatable output polarizer 34 and an exit iris 35 disposed
on a reflection axis 36, and an optical detector 38. A computer 40
receives the measured optical intensities and controls the polarizers 32
and 34. They chose to use a wide band Xe arc lamp as the light source 26
and include a monochromator just before the optical detector 38. More
details may be found in their patent. The ellipsometer provides an
incident beam of a predetermined polarization state extending through the
window of the input port 22 and striking the substrate 10 at an oblique
angle .phi..sub.i away from the surface normal. The incident radiation
interacts with the top micrometer or so of material on the substrate 10
(i.e., the growing thin film) and is reflected in a changed polarization
state along the reflection axis 36 extending through the output port 18.
The reflection axis 36 is angularly displaced from the normal 20 by
.phi..sub.0. For specular reflection,
.phi..sub.i =.phi..sub.0. (1)
The ellipsometer of Aspnes and Quinn has been used to control the growth of
thin films of ternary semiconductors, e.g. Al.sub.x Ga.sub.1-x As. It is
highly precise, capable of controlling variations of the alloying
percentage x to less than 0.1%
However, its accuracy has been substantially less. Accuracy depends on the
absolute value of the alloying percentage x, not just its variation. The
accuracy has been limited by the lack an exact numerical value of the
incident angle .phi..sub.i, which is used in reducing the experimentally
derived ellipsometric data to the complex refractive indices or dielectric
functions of the material being probed by the ellipsometer. In the past,
the incident angle .phi..sub.i was determined by triangulation. However,
the sample holder 12 is within the vacuum chamber 14 having very limited
optical access, and its angular position cannot usually be moved. As a
result, triangulation becomes difficult. Another commonly used technique
involves auto-collimation in which the sample is replaced by a mirror
mounted on a precision rotatable stage. The stage or light source is then
moved until the reflected beam coincides with the incident beam.
Thereafter, the stage is rotated through a precisely measured angle to its
operational position. Reflective auto-collimation is not useful with
growth chambers because the substrate holder is designed for
considerations inconsistent with a precision rotatable stage. Another
indirect technique involves mounting a reference sample of known
refractive indices and performing ellipsometry upon it. The value of
.phi..sub.i which best reduces the ellipsometric data to the known (or
assumed) dielectric function of the sample is taken as the incident angle.
However, this technique requires that the actual surface composition of
the reference sample be precisely known and be constant. Therefore, the
accuracy of the indirect approach depends on the unknown reproducibility
of the reference sample.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Accordingly, an object of the invention is to provide a highly accurate
angular alignment of a sample relative to an optical beam.
Another object of the invention is to provide an accurate value of the
angular displacement between an optical beam incident on a sample and the
surface normal of that sample.
The invention can be summarized as the method and apparatus required to
determine the oblique angle of incidence of an optical beam on a sample. A
diffraction grating is placed in the position of the sample. Its period is
selected such that, when an optical beam of narrow frequency width, e.g. a
laser beam, shines on the grating, a non-zero-order diffraction beam can
be made coincident with the laser beam. When the beams are coincident, the
angle of incidence is related by well known equations to the grating
period and the optical frequency.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of the geometry involved in
ellipsometric monitoring of a growing thin film.
FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of the method of measuring the incident
angle of an optical beam.
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of a diffraction grating usable with the
invention.
FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of a beam splitter usable in
auto-collimation.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
According to the invention, auto-collimation of a higher-order beam
diffracted from a grating positions the input beam at a precisely fixed
angle relative to the normal of the grating. As illustrated in FIG. 2, a
diffraction grating 40 having a grating period d replaces the substrate 10
on the substrate holder 12. The input beam propagating light of wavelength
.lambda. along the incident axis 28 is both specularly reflected in a
zero-order beam along the reflection axis 36 and diffracted into multiple
higher-order beams. The figure illustrates a first-order beam 42 located
at an angle .phi..sub.1 from the normal 20 and a second-order beam 44 at
an angle .phi..sub.2. The angles are interrelated by well known equations:
d sin .phi..sub.i -d sin .phi..sub.1 =.lambda. (2)
and
d sin .phi..sub.i +d sin .phi..sub.2 =2.lambda.. (3)
If the second-order beam 44 is auto-collimated with the input beam 28, that
is, the two beams 28 and 44 are made coincident, then
.phi..sub.2 =.phi..sub.i. (4)
Substitution of Equation (4) into Equation (3) and rearranging it produce a
calculable value of the incident angle
##EQU1##
Therefore, under the auto-collimation condition, the incident angle
.phi..sub.i can be calculated from the grating period d and the light
wavelength .lambda.. Alternatively, if the grating is designed according
to a particular value of .phi..sub.i, when the diffracted beam is
auto-collimated with the incident beam, the angular relationship between
the grating and the incident beam accurately conforms to this value of the
incident angle. For auto-collimation of the second-order beam 44,
.phi..sub.1 =0 so that the first-order beam 42 is coincident with the
normal 20.
EXAMPLE
The invention was demonstrated using a HeNe laser 46 during the alignment
procedure. The laser 46 emits at .lambda.=632.82 nm. With this value of
.lambda. and the nominal value of 70.degree. for .phi..sub.i, Equation (5)
required that the grating 40 have a non-standard pitch 1/d of 1484.9
grooves per millimeter.
Such a grating was custom made. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) was coated as
a resist layer on a two-inch (5 cm) GaAs wafer. An electron beam wrote the
grating pattern of nominal period d into a 2 mm square of the resist at
the center of the wafer, the resist was developed, and then the GaAs was
etched with reactive ion etching with BCl.sub.3 to transfer the grating
pattern to the substrate. There resulted a grating 40, as illustrated in
cross-section in FIG. 3, of period d. The grooves were approximately 200
nm deep. The groove width approximately equaled the mesa width. After its
fabrication, the grating was mounted on an indium-free (clipping) mounting
block. It was determined that mounting with In could warp the 500 .mu.m
thick substrate. The grating period d was measured outside of the chamber
14 after the grating has been attached to the mounting block using the
HeNe alignment laser 46 and a transit. Its value was 672.0 nm, which would
determine the true value of .phi..sub.i in the alignment procedure. A
silicon diffraction grating would have been preferred. Blazing would have
increased the intensity of the desired diffraction order.
The mount holding the diffraction grating 40 was then attached to the
substrate holder 12. A pencil tip punched a 1 mm hole in a paper card 48.
The card 48 was then taped to the laser 46 such that the laser beam 28
penetrated the hole. The laser 46 was then substituted for the light
source 26 in the ellipsometer set up around the vacuum chamber 14. Rough
alignment of the laser beam 28 with the small area of the grating 40 was
achieved by projecting the first-order beam 38 onto another white card and
maximizing its intensity. The second-order beam 44 was then observed on
the unperforated portion of the paper card 48. The laser 46 and the
attached card 48 were moved laterally until the second-order beam 44
disappeared into the punched hole, in which situation the second-order
beam 44 was auto-collimated with the laser beam 28, and the incident angle
.phi..sub.i was precisely determined from the values of d and .lambda..
The entrance and exit irises 30 and 35 were then centered on the incident
and specularly reflected beams 28 and 36 to lock in the alignment when
using the Xe arc lamp and sample being tested by the ellipsometer.
The accuracy in the value of .phi..sub.i using the above technique is
estimated to be about .+-.0.06.degree.. The accuracy could be improved
using more elaborate techniques. For example, a beam splitter 50,
illustrated in cross-section in FIG. 4, could be used to intercept the
input beam 28 and the second-order beam 44. The beam splitter 50 is a cube
of quartz having a half-silvered diagonal 52. Additionally, one side is
coated with a reflector 54. The laser light shining from the left side is
partially transmitted across and partially reflected downwardly from the
interface 52. The second-order beam propagating from the right is
partially reflected upwardly from the interface 52, reflected downwardly
by the reflector 54, and partially transmitted downwardly through the
interface 52. The optical pattern at the bottom of the beam splitter 50 is
monitored. In auto-collimation, the laser beam and the second-order beam
merge into a single beam.
Although the above embodiment uses the second-order diffracted beam for
auto-collimation, any higher-order (greater than zero order) diffracted
beam could be auto-collimated with the incident beam. Equation (5) can be
generalized to
##EQU2##
where n is a positive integer.
The choice of a nominal incident angle .phi..sub.i of 70.degree. was
dictated by the existing viewing ports 16 and 18. Many vacuum stations are
configured with two viewing ports separated by 135.degree. so that
.phi..sub.i would be 671/2.degree.. Ellipsometry is most accurate when
performed near the pseudo-Brewster angle, that is, when the tangent of
incident angle .phi..sub.i equals the refractive index of the material
being probed. For most semiconductive materials, this is about
70.degree.-75.degree.. Sensitivity considerations suggest limiting
.phi..sub.i to the range of 60.degree. to 75.degree., preferably
65.degree. to 75.degree..
Although the above example used a laser as a light source for the
alignment, a narrow-bandwidth light source could be substituted, e.g., a
Xe lamp with a monochromator. The bandwidth needs to be small enough that
the spectrally induced beam spreading in the diffracted beam is less than
the desired angular accuracy.
The alignment method and apparatus of the invention thus provide a simple
but highly accurate alignment of an ellipsometer. The accuracy allows the
ellipsometer to provide accurate absolute values of material compositions.
The invention can be used for other optical measuring equipment in which
the off-normal angle of incidence needs to be accurately known.
* * * * *
|
|
|
|
|
Description  |
|