WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Fire retarded solvents    

Get related patents on CD
United States Patent5207953   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/5207953.html
Inventor(s)Thorssen; Donald A. (Calgary, CA); Loree; Dwight N. (Calgary, CA)
AbstractA fire retarded solvent composition includes a mixture of at least one flammable organic solvent; and a mixture of at least one brominated hydrocarbon, in an amount sufficient to decrease the flame propagation rate of the composition and preferably increase the flash point of the solvent composition. The brominated hydrocarbon may be selected from the group consisting of dibromoethane, dibromomethane, chlorodibromomethane, bromochloromethane, dibromodifluoromethane, dibromodifluoroethane, 1,2,dibromo-1.1-difluoroethane, chlorodibromofluoromethane, 1,2dibromotetrafluoroethane and 1,2dibromoethylene. Dibromomethane and bromochloromethane are preferred. When used as an oil and gas operation fluid, the fluorinated hydrocarbons should not be used, nor should the brominated hydrocarbon be an aromatic or contain an oxygen bridge. The organic solvent is preferably selected from the group consisting of light petroleum distillate, diesel and crude, the fluid hydrocarbon primarily having between 5 and 12 carbon atoms.
   














 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History Custom Search
Inventor     Thorssen; Donald A. (Calgary, CA); Loree; Dwight N. (Calgary, CA)
Owner/Assignee     Trisol Inc. (Calgary, CA)
Patent assignment
All assignments
Company News
Publication Date     May 4, 1993
Application Number     07/800,475
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     November 27, 1991
US Classification     252/601 252/364 252/602 507/203 507/929
Int'l Classification     C09K 021/08 C09K 007/06 C23G 005/028
Examiner     Lovering; Richard D.
Assistant Examiner     Anthony; Joseph D.
Attorney/Law Firm     Christensen, O'Connor, Johnson & Kindness
Address
Parent Case    
Priority Data    
USPTO Field of Search     252/601 252/602 252/364
Patent Tags     fire retarded solvents
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
2217926



[0 after 0 votes]
2297660



[0 after 0 votes]
2805722



[0 after 0 votes]
2894584



[0 after 0 votes]
2898294



[0 after 0 votes]
3151992



[0 after 0 votes]
3288216



[0 after 0 votes]
3496107



[0 after 0 votes]
3712393



[0 after 0 votes]
3730898



[0 after 0 votes]
3773677



[0 after 0 votes]
3827978



[0 after 0 votes]
5102557
Nimitz
252/8
Apr,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
4902310
Vara
95/259
Feb,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4900456
Ogilvy
507/262
Feb,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4865129
Ryles
166/295
Sep,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4839096
Dennis

Jun,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4775489
Watkins
507/202
Oct,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4663027
Mendiratta
208/262.1
May,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
4645615
Drake
252/78.5
Feb,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
4593764
Lilienthal

Jun,1986

[0 after 0 votes]
4387016
Gagon
208/390
Jun,1983

[0 after 0 votes]
4101425
Young
507/260
Jul,1978

[0 after 0 votes]
3974116
Lissant
524/436
Aug,1976

[0 after 0 votes]
3933669
Fowlkes
252/78.5
Jan,1976

[0 after 0 votes]
4174283
Griffin, Jr.
507/203
Dec,1969

[0 after 0 votes]
4153066
Griffin, Jr.
137/13
Dec,1969

[0 after 0 votes]
4083698
Wenzel
44/301
Dec,1969

[0 after 0 votes]
4001129
Sheratte
252/78.5
Dec,1969

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B

[0 market size comments]
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%

[0 market share comments]
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%

[0 reasonable royalty comments]
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

[0 Guesstimation of Royalty Value Comments]
License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
[0 license availability comments]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
[0 owner/assignee comments]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

[0 competitive advantage comments]
Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

[0 commercial alternatives comments]
 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


We claim:

1. A fire retarded solvent composition for use as an oil and gas operation fluid, the composition comprising:

a mixture of at least one well formation compatible flammable or combustible organic solvent; and

at least one non-flourine containing brominated non-aromatic hydrocarbon dissolved in the organic solvent in an amount sufficient to cause a decrease in the flame propagation rate of the composition said brominated non-aromatic hydrocarbon being present in an amount of no more than about 5% by volume of said organic solvent.

2. The fire retarded solvent composition of claim 1 in which the mixture of at least one organic solvent includes a mixture of at least one alcohol.

3. The fire retarded solvent composition of claim 1 in which the mixture of at least one brominated hydrocarbon is selected from the group consisting of dibromoethane, dibromomethane, chlorodibromomethane, bromochloromethane and 1,2dibromoethylene.

4. The fire retarded solvent composition of claim 3 in which the mixture of at least one organic solvent is selected from the group consisting of light petroleum distillate, diesel and crude, the organic solvent primarily having between 5 and 12 carbon atoms.

5. The fire retarded solvent composition of claim 4 in which the mixture of at least one organic solvent is a light petroleum distillate having primarily between 5 and 12 carbon atoms.

6. The fire retarded solvent composition of claim 5 in which the organic solvent includes at least 30% by volume of aromatics.

7. The fire retarded solvent composition of claim 1 in which the mixture of at least one brominated non-aromatic hydrocarbon is in an amount no greater than 1.5% by volume of the solvent composition.

8. The fire retarded solvent composition of claim 7 in which the mixture of at least one brominated non-aromatic hydrocarbon is selected from the group consisting of dibromomethane and bromochloromethane.

9. The fire retarded solvent composition of claim 8 in which the organic solvent includes at least 30% aromatics by volume.

10. A fire retarded solvent composition for use as an industrial or household solvent, the composition comprising:

a mixture of at least one flammable organic solvent; and

at least one brominated non-aromatic hydrocarbon dissolved in the organic solvent in an amount sufficient to cause a decrease in the flame propagation rate of the composition said brominated non-aromatic hydrocarbon being present in an amount of no more than about 5% by volume of said organic solvent.

11. The fire retarded solvent composition of claim 10 in which the at least one brominated non-aromatic hydrocarbon is selected form the group consisting of dibromoethane, dibromomethane, chlorodibromomethane, bromochloromethane, dibromodifluoromethane, dibromodifluoroethane, 1,2dibromo-1.1-difluoroethane, chlorodibromofluoromethane, 1,2dibromotetrafluoroethane and 1,2dibromoethylene.

12. The fire retarded solvent composition of claim 11 in which the organic solvent is selected from the group consisting of light petroleum distillate, diesel and crude, the organic solvent primarily having between 5 and 12 carbon atoms.

13. The fire retarded solvent composition of claim 12 in which the at least one brominated non-aromatic hydrocarbon is in an amount no greater than 1.5% by volume.
 Description Submit all comments and votes
 


TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to solvents, particularly hydrocarbon solvents, and which may be used particularly as oil and gas well site operation fluid compositions or as industrial solvents, and to a method of fire retarding such solvents.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Many industrial and household organic solvents such as hydrocarbon solvents manufactured under the trademark VARSOL of Imperial Oil, Calgary, Canada, or such as turpentine, are made of petroleum distillates and are frequently flammable. This evidently creates a hazard, particularly when these solvents are used in oil and gas exploration as well site operation fluids. Such well site operation fluids are pumped down the well, often under high pressure, and are frequently used in the vicinity of equipment with high temperature components, such as exhaust pipes. The use of flammable organic solvents in these conditions and during transportation evidently presents a hazard.

In particular, when light petroleum distillates (having primarily between 5 and 12 carbon atoms) are used for fracturing a well formation, the very high pressures used can create a fire hazard. For example, among frac oils used in industry, the following products of Dome Petroleum Limited of Calgary, Alberta have densities (in kg/m.sup.3 at 15.degree. C.) and flash points (flash points are Pensky Martens throughout this patent disclosure) indicated: FRAC OIL 120 . . . 780, 10.degree. C.; FRAC OIL 200 . . . 785, 20.degree. C.; FRAC OIL 300 . . . 800, -3.degree. C.; FRAC OIL 500 . . . 798, 15.degree. C. SUPER FRAC.TM. made by Home Oil Company Limited of Calgary, Alberta has a flash point of 15.degree. C. and density of 778. Diesel P-40 has a flash point of 43.degree. C. and density of 820. These fluids are being actively used as frac oils and the present invention is believed to have utility for fire retarding them, and other similar flammable organic solvents.

Substitution of other fluids for the volatile hydrocarbons, or alteration of these fluids to make them non-flammable, cannot be reliably predicted to work in part because of formation compatibility.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The inventors have proposed a way of fire retarding flammable and combustible organic solvents such as the lighter hydrocarbons particularly for use in wellsite operations, but also for use as industrial or household solvents with low volume percentages of additive. These fluids are non-aqueous.

The inventors have therefore proposed in one aspect of the invention a fire retarded solvent composition for use as an oil and gas operation fluid, the composition comprising at least one formation compatible combustible organic solvent; and at least one brominated non-aromatic hydrocarbon dissolved in the organic solvent in an amount sufficient to cause a decrease in the flame propagation rate of the solvent composition.

The inventors found, moreover, that the fire retarded organic solvents thus produced were compatible with most formations and would be superior to existing drilling and service fluids.

In another aspect of the invention the inventors have proposed a fire retarded solvent composition for use as an industrial or household solvent, the composition comprising at least one flammable organic solvent; and at least one brominated hydrocarbon dissolved in the organic solvent in an amount sufficient to cause a decrease in the flame propagation rate of the solvent composition.

In a still further aspect of the invention there is proposed a method of fire retarding a flammable organic solvent to create a fire retarded organic solvent, the method comprising the step of dissolving in the flammable organic solvent a mixture of at least one brominated hydrocarbon in an amount sufficient to decrease the flame propagation rate of the organic solvent.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The brominated hydrocarbon should be selected to allow sufficient concentration of additive in the vapour phase to result in a decrease in the flame propagation rate of the composition and preferably increase the flash point and fire point of the composition.

The preferred organic solvents for use as formation compatible oil and gas well site operation fluids (sometimes referred to as operation fluids) typically comprise combustible or flammable fluid hydrocarbons such as light petroleum distillates (condensates), diesel and crude oil, these being hydrocarbons having between 5 and 12 carbon atoms (C5-C12) and traces of hydrocarbons having up to 30+ carbon atoms. The preferred cut is about 100.degree. C. and greater. A good example is the Sundre C5+ condensate available from Trysol Inc. of Calgary, Alberta, Canada distilled to 110.degree. C. It includes the following constituents (with volume fraction in parentheses as determined by gas chromatography): heptanes (0.0072), octanes (0.1191), nonanes (0.1028), decanes (0.1143), undecanes (0.0927), dodecanes (0.0687), tridecanes (0.0598), tetradecanes (0.0449), pentadecanes (0.0366) and smaller quantities of C.sub.16 + alkanes, as well as smaller quantities of toluene (0.0131), benzene and xylene (ethylbenzene, p+m-xylene 0.0371, o-xylene 0.0156, 1,2,4 trimethylbenzene 0.0158). However, actual aromatic content is believed to be about 35% (the gas chromatography does not distinguish between some aromatics and alkanes). The preferred organic solvent primarily includes a mixture of alkanes and aromatics.

These organic solvents typically have a specific gravity of about 0.8, so that when mixed with no more than about 5% by volume of halogenated hydrocarbon as described in this disclosure, the fire retarded solvent will typically have a specific gravity of less than 0.9. Thus, fluid condensate (98.degree. C. cut, s.g. .7950) may be mixed with up to 5% dibromomethane (b.p. 96.degree.-98.degree. C.) to produce an organic solvent with a specific gravity of up to 0.8794. Fluid condensates with which the mixture of brominated hydrocarbon may be added to improve fire retardancy include C4 condensate from the Coleman field in Alberta, Canada, with s.g. of 0.800, or C6+ condensate from the Harmattan Area Gas Plant in Alberta, Canada, with s.g. of about 0.765. Useful flammable organic solvents include hydrocarbon solvents manufactured under the trademark VARSOL of Imperial Oil Canada.

When the flammable organic solvent is used in well site operations, it is preferred that the organic solvent include toluene, ethylbenzene, para-xylene, meta-xylene, ortho-xylene as well as other mono-, di- and tri-aromatics to assist in solvating waxes and asphaltenes. In particular, if a particular condensate from a refinery is found after analysis and testing to assist in asphaltene precipitation, then xylene (preferably from a 130.degree. C. to 145.degree. C. cut) may be added to ensure compatibility of the organic solvent with the reservoir. The xylene may be obtained by removing a xylene rich cut from for example the Sundre feed stock described above and further distilling it to produce a cut that is richer in xylene. It is desirable to ensure that the percentage of aromatics in the solvent be kept above about 30% since otherwise there is increasing danger of asphaltene precipitation.

Other organic solvents for use in wells should be formation compatible and include hydrocarbon derivatives such as alcohols, ketones, esters, ethers, and terpenes.

Due to restrictions on the commercial use of fully brominated hydrocarbons, these are not believed to have utility in all places and at all times, and thus the emphasis in this patent disclosure is on the properties of partially brominated hydrocarbons whose utility is believed to be of greatest use in the compositions and methods of the invention. Nonetheless, the fire retardant properties of fully brominated hydrocarbons are desirable properties so that where permitted by law they might be used. Also, other brominated hydrocarbons can be highly toxic, thus for example, it is not recommended to use bromomethane. Brominated hydrocarbons in particular have surprising utility when used in or as a formation compatible oil and gas well site operation fluid. The bromines provide good fire retardance in small quantities. Bromochloromethane may be used as the brominated hydrocarbon, and the addition of the chlorine, by lowering the boiling point of the additive, is believed to assist in the fire retardant properties of the composition.

Other halogens may have utility in some circumstances, but they are presently expensive to manufacture and therefore are not preferred. Dibromomethane is believed to be preferred. Test results show a desirable composition would include about up to 5% of dibromomethane when added to a 98.degree. C. cut fluid condensate, yielding a specific gravity up to 0.8794.

Other brominated hydrocarbons believed to have utility as good fire retardants, while being formation compatible, include dibromoethane (s.g. 2.18, b.p. 131.degree.-132.degree. C.), chlorodibromomethane (s.g. 2.451, b.p. 119.degree.-120.degree. C.), bromochloromethane (s.g. 1.991, b.p. 68.degree. C.), and 1,2dibromoethylene (s.g. 2.246, b.p. 110.degree. C.). Alkanes are believed to be most useful because they may be economically produced. Further, for oil and gas operations it is believed to be inadvisable to use brominated aromatics, particularly aromatics with an oxygen bridge, since where there is sulphur in the well formation fluid, the sulphur may react with the bromine and produce corrosive compounds (such as HBr). However, such compounds may still have utility where the solvent is not being used in oil and gas operations or where hydrogen sulphide is not present.

The inventors have also found, unexpectedly, that dibromodifluoromethane can assist in causing asphaltene precipitation in some reservoir fluids. It is believed that this is due to the presence of the fluorine in the halocarbon. This is surprising because the halogen analog carbon tetrachloride is compatible with most reservoirs, as is dibromomethane. The precipitation of asphaltenes can be very damaging to formations, and thus it is believed that use of fluorinated hydrocarbons is not in general desirable.

In wells with low downhole pressures, the composition of the present invention has particular utility in that heavy fluids cannot be used. However, a mixture of condensate and brominated hydrocarbon may be readily prepared that has low density.

The composition of the present invention also helps to reduce the viscosity of vegetable oil formation compatible oil and gas well site operation fluids. Mixtures of less than 5% halogenated hydrocarbon by volume in the vegetable oil can give the vegetable oil desirable viscosity.

The composition of the present invention may also be used to fire retard operation fluids during transportation and storage.

It will be understood that not all operation fluids will be compatible with every well, so that care must be taken to select the appropriate mixture of operation fluids and brominated hydrocarbons for the well of concern.

The brominated hydrocarbons noted here, particularly dibromomethane and chlorobromomethane, or mixtures of them, may also be used to fire retard solvents, particularly hydrocarbon solvents that are derived from petroleum refining such as aromatics and naphthalenes. These are also useful frac fluids. For example, in the case of VARSOL.sup..TM., a variable composition of aromatics, naphthalenes and chain saturates, addition of less than 1% dibromomethane and chlorobromomethane in a mixture is believed to be sufficient for fire retardance. Similarly, such a low percentage of brominated hydrocarbon mixed with diesel, or another fluid petroleum distillate cut above about 100.degree. C., is believed to provide good fire retardancy. A combination of dibromomethane and chlorobromomethane is also believed to be useful when used in combination since the dibromomethane boils at 98.degree. C. and the chlorobromomethane, since it boils at 66.degree. C., this reduces the average boiling point of the additive. In the case of the use of the organic solvent as a commercial or consumer solvent, then fluorinated hydrocarbons may be used such as dibromodifluoromethane (b.p. 22.degree.-23.degree. C.), dibromodifluoroethane (s.g.2.224), 1,2,dibromo-1,1-difluoroethane (b.p. 93.degree.-94.degree. C.), chlorodibromofluoromethane (b.p. 79.degree.-80.degree. C.) and 1,2dibromotetrafluoroethane (s.g.2.175, b.p. 47.degree. C.).

Useful commercial solvents in which the brominated hydrocarbons are believed to be miscible and to produce good fire retardancy include acetone, amyl acetate, amyl alcohol, n-amylamine, n-amylbenzene, n-amylchloride, benzene, benzyl chloride, bromoform, bromo-m-xylene, o-bromotoluene, n-butane, butanol, carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, cumene, naphthene, cyclohexane, dimethyl ether, dipentene, ethane, ethanol, ethylbenzene, ethyl bromide, ethyl chloride, ethylene, ethylene dibromide, ethylene dichloride, ethylene glycol monoethyl, ethyl ether, n-hexane, isopropanol, isopropyl ether, methane, methanol, methylcyclohexane, methyl formate, naphthalene, acetone, pentachloroethane, pentane, perchloroethylene, phenol, phenyl methyl ether, propane, propanol, toluene and xylene.

EXAMPLES

Tests conducted on diesel and other organic solvents (diesel, San Frac Oil, Arosol HTU available from Gulf Oil, Calgary, Canada, FRACOIL 200, SUPERFRAC OIL and BP PC condensate, available from British petroleum, Calgary, Canada) with various combinations of brominated hydrocarbons (CF.sub.2 Br.sub.2 and CH.sub.2 Br.sub.2) showed good solubility of the additive in the organic solvent, and compatibility with current gellation processes. Flash points tests showed flash points of various mixtures of organic solvents with brominated hydrocarbons of the invention as shown in the following table (percentages are volume percentages):

______________________________________ FLASH FIRE PT PT ASTM ASTM FLUID D-93 D-92 ______________________________________ DIESEL (NO ADDITIVE) 45 63 DIESEL + 2.5% CH.sub.2 Br.sub.2 48 108 DIESEL + 1% CF.sub.2 Br.sub.2 + >100 130 2% CH.sub.2 Br.sub.2 DIESEL + 2% CF.sub.2 Br.sub.2 + >100 130 1% CH.sub.2 Br.sub.2 DIESEL + .5% CF.sub.2 Br.sub.2 + >100 83 .5% CH.sub.2 Br.sub.2 DIESEL + 1% CH.sub.2 Br.sub.2 + >100 1% CH.sub.2 BrCl DIESEL + .5% CH.sub.2 Br.sub.2 + >100 .5% CH.sub.2 BrCl DIESEL + 2.5% CH.sub.2 Br.sub.2 + >100 2.5% CH.sub.2 BrCl TURPENTINE 36 (56) 56 TURPENTINE + 5% CH.sub.2 Br.sub.2 >100 (60) 99 TURPENTINE + 5% CF.sub.2 Br.sub.2 >100 (61) 63 TURPENTINE + 2.5% >100 (60) 62 CH.sub.2 Br.sub.2 + 2.5% CF.sub.2 Br.sub.2 VARSOL .TM. 46 55 VARSOL .TM. + 5% CH.sub.2 Br.sub.2 >100 (58) 77 VARSOL .TM. + 5% CF.sub.2 Br.sub.2 >100 (67) 81 VARSOL .TM. + 2.5% CH.sub.2 Br.sub.2 + >100 (65) 74 2.5% CF.sub.2 Br.sub.2 PAINT THINNER (P.T.) 46 52 P.T. + 5% CH.sub.2 Br.sub.2 >100 (61) 75 P.T. + 5% CF.sub.2 Br.sub.2 >100 (60) 72 P.T. + 2.5% CH.sub.2 Br.sub.2 + >100 (61) 82 2.5% CF.sub.2 Br.sub.2 TOLUENE 8 (11) 17 TOLUENE + 5% CH.sub.2 Br.sub.2 10 (24) 60 TOLUENE + 5% CF.sub.2 Br.sub.2 N/A (23) 40 TOLUENE + 2.5% CH.sub.2 Br.sub.2 + N/A (24) 40 2.5% CF.sub.2 Br.sub.2 XYLENE 25 (34) 38 XYLENE + 5% CH.sub.2 Br.sub.2 29 (39) 80 XYLENE + 5% CF.sub.2 Br.sub.2 >100 (45) 71 XYLENE + 2.5% CH.sub.2 Br.sub.2 + >100 (39) 70 2.5% CF.sub.2 Br.sub.2 METHANOL 12