|
|  Get related patents on CD |
| United States Patent | 5219101 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/5219101.html |
| Inventor(s) | Matkovich; Vlado I. (Glen Cove, NY);
Schlaudecker; Thomas E. (Hamilton Square, NJ);
Henley; Martin W. (New Hope, PA);
Bormann; Thomas (Seaford, NY) |
| Abstract | A device for dispensing liquids in drop form of substantially uniform size
is provided which includes a container having a dropper tip including a
passageway for ingress of air to and egress of liquid from the device, the
passageway communicating between the container and an orifice in the
dropper tip; means for temporarily reducing the volume of the container;
and, disposed within the dropper tip, across the passageway, a microporous
composite membrane with pores of a size to resist passage of contaminants.
The membrane has a liquophilic component which permits delivery of drops
of a liquid to a desired location outside the container and a liquophobic
component which is adapted to resist the passage of such liquid but to
permit the passage therethrough of air. Both the liquophilic and
liquophobic components of the membrane (which intersects the passageway)
communicate with the passageway. The surface area and pore size of the
liquophilic component is so selected as to meter liquid being dispensed in
drop form and avoid a stream of liquid from emerging from the dropper tip
during normal use. |
| |
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing from US Patent 5219101 |
|
|
Contamination-resistant dispensing and metering drop forming device |
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
June 15, 1993 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
January 17, 1991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parent Case |
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 07/360,041,
filed Jun. 1, 1989, now abandoned. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
We claim:
1. A device for dispensing liquids in drop form of substantially uniform
size which comprises a container having a dropper tip including a
passageway for ingress of air to and egress of liquid from said device,
said passageway communicating between the container and an orifice in the
dropper tip; means for temporarily reducing the volume of the container;
and disposed within the dropper tip, across the passageway, a microporous
composite membrane with pores of a size to resist passage of contaminants,
said membrane having a liquophilic component permitting delivery of drops
of a liquid to a desired location outside the container and a liquophobic
component adapted to resist the passage of such liquid but to permit the
passage therethrough of air, the surface area and pore size of said
liquophilic component being so selected as to meter liquid being dispensed
in drop form and avoid a stream of liquid from emerging from the dropper
tip during normal use, said passageway being intersected by said membrane
and communicating with both the liquophilic and liquophobic components.
2. A device according to claim 1 wherein and the pore size of the
liquophoilic component of the membrane is from about 0.04 to about 0.65
.mu.m.
3. A device according to claim 1 wherein the pore size of the liquophobic
component of the membrane is from about 0.01 to about 0.45 .mu.m.
4. A device according to claim 1 wherein the liquophilic component
comprises from about 50 to about 70% of the surface area of the membrane.
5. A device according to claim 1 wherein the volume between the composite
membrane and the dropper tip orifice is from about 0.001 to about 0.15
cm.sup.3.
6. A device according to claim 1 adapted to dispense an aqueous solution
wherein the liquophobic component has a critical wetting surface tension
of less than 35 dynes/cm.
7. A device according to claim 6 wherein the liquophilic component of the
composite membrane has a critical wetting surface tension of at least 72
dynes/cm.
8. A device according to claim 6 wherein said aqueous solution includes a
medicine.
9. A device according to claim 1 wherein the liquophilic component is made
from a surface-modified microporous nylon polymer membrane.
10. A device according to claim 1 wherein the liquophobic component is made
from a surface-modified microporous polyvinylidene fluoride membrane.
11. A device according to claim 1 wherein the container has elastically
deformable sides.
12. A device according to claim 1 wherein the porosity of the composite
microporous membrane is suitable for resisting the passage of bacterial
contamination and the liquophilic component has a surface area of from
about 20 mm.sup.2 to about 90 mm.sup.2.
13. A device according to claim 1 wherein said liquophilic component
comprises a surface-modified microporous nylon membrane and said
liquophobic component comprises a surface-modified microporous
polyvinylidene fluoride membrane.
14. A device according to claim 1 wherein said liquophilic component
comprises a surface-modified polyamide membrane having a CWST of at least
about 50 dynes/cm and said liquophobic component comprises a
surface-modified polyamide having a CWST of less than about 35 dynes/cm.
15. A device according to claim 14 wherein the CWST of said liquophilic
component is at least about 72 dynes/cm and said liquophobic component is
less than about 29 dynes/cm.
16. A device according to claim 1 wherein said orifice comprises a single
orifice.
17. A device according to claim 1 wherein said liquophilic and liquophobic
components are arranged in juxtaposed relationship.
18. A device according to claim 1 wherein the liquophilic component
comprises a surface treated polyvinylidene fluoride membrane.
19. A device according to claim wherein each of the liquophilic and
liquiphobic components comprise polyvinylidene fluoride membranes.
20. A device according to claim 1 wherein said liquophilic component
comprises a surface-treated polyvinylidene fluoride membrane having a CWST
of at least 50 dynes/cm and said liquophobic component comprises a
polyvinylidene fluoride membrane having a CWST of less than about 75
dynes/cm.
21. A device for dispensing liquids in drop form of substantially uniform
size which comprises an elastically deformable container having a dropper
tip with a passageway therethrough for ingress of air to and egress of
liquid from said device, said passageway terminating in an orifice and,
disposed within the dropper tip and across the passageway, a composite
microporous membrane with pore sizes less than 0.45 .mu.m, said membrane
comprising a hydrophilic component and a hydrophobic component, said
hydrophilic component providing from about 60 to about 70% of the surface
area of the composite membrane, said hydrophilic component having a
surface area so selected as to meter liquid being dispensed in drop form
and avoid a stream of liquid from emerging from the dropper tip during
normal use, and said passageway being intersected by said membrane and
communicating with both of said hydrophilic and hydrophobic components.
22. A device according to claim 21 wherein a composite microporous membrane
has first and second components bonded together in side-by-side
relationship, the first component having a surface area of from about 40
mm.sup.2 to about 50 mm.sup.2, an average pore size of from about 0.15 to
about 0.25 .mu.m, and a CWST of at least about 72 dynes/cm and being made
from a surface-modified polyamide; and the second component being made
from a polyamide that has been surface-modified to produce a CWST of less
than about 35 dynes/cm and having an average pore size of from about 0.1
to about 0.2 .mu.m.
23. A device according to claim 22 wherein the volume between the orifice
of the dropper and the surface of the composite membrane closest to the
tip is from about 0.05 to about 0.1 cm.sup.3.
24. A device for dispensing liquids in drop form of substantially uniform
size which comprises a container having a dropper tip including a
passageway for ingress of air to and egress of liquid from said device,
said passageway communicating between the container and an orifice in the
dropper tip and, disposed within the dropper tip across the passageway, a
microporous membrane with pores of a size to resist passage of
contaminants, said membrane having a liquophilic component permitting
delivery of drops of a liquid to a desired location outside the container,
and a liquophobic component adapted to resist the passage of such liquid
but to permit the passage therethrough of air, said passageway being
intersected by said membrane and communicating with both of said
liquophilic and liquophobic components, the surface area and pore size of
the liquophilic component being selected so as to meter the liquid being
dispensed in drop form and avoid a stream of liquid from emerging from the
dropper tip during normal use.
25. A device according to claim 24 wherein the porosity of the microporous
membrane is selected so as to resist the passage of bacterial contaminants
and the surface area of the hydrophilic component is from about 20
mm.sup.2 to about 90 mm.sup.2. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates to a liquid dispensing and metering device that is
especially useful in, for example, the dispensing of optical drugs that
typically need to be dispensed in drop form. The present invention
provides such a device that also protects the solution from contamination
while retained in the device.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention has wide application in situations where a liquid is
required to be dispensed in metered amounts at regular intervals from a
container and in which it is critical that contamination from outside,
whether particulate or bacterial in nature, be excluded. This is most
frequently encountered in the context of the dispensing of medicines such
as ophthalmic medicines but the utility of the invention extends to the
protection of any liquid against particulate contamination. For ease of
understanding, however, the invention will be described primarily in the
context of the application that, as is presently anticipated, will be the
most commercially attractive.
Many drugs, particularly those used in treatment of various eye disorders,
are administered in drop form. The drops are intended to free-fall onto
the eye surface, where they distribute across the exposed eye. Dosage of
these ophthalmic drugs is often crucial: lower than prescribed levels can
result in failure of the treatment and consequent progression of the
disease, higher levels can result in untoward side effects that can also
interfere with successful resolution.
Complicating the administration of these drugs is the fact that they are
often required several times a day and thus, to be practical, must be
applied by the patients themselves and not by medical personnel who are
formally trained in drug delivery. Patient administration of such drugs
has resulted in two serious problems which must be solved for these
medications to be successfully used: container contamination and flow
rate.
CONTAINER CONTAMINATION
The possibility that bacterial contamination may enter the drug container
and proliferate there is an ever-present problem that can destroy the
utility of the medicine. This can be the result of dropper contact with a
non-sterile surface, such as a body part, or by some other mechanism.
The problem can be most readily understood in the context of the
administration of drops of an ophthalmic medicine. Ideally, the pendant
drop formed at the tip of the conventional dropper container when the
container is squeezed should be allowed to free-fall to the surface of the
eye. In addition, the distance between the dropper tip and the surface of
the eye should be kept reasonably close. This is important so that the
momentum acquired by the free-falling drop will not be so great as to
encourage the drop to splatter on impact with the eye surface and thus be
substantially lost to the outer surface of the lids and face. Where
administration is by a trained professional, it is relatively easy to
ensure that the free-falling drop is discharged close to the eye surface.
It is substantially more difficult to do this when the drug is
self-administered. Gauging such short distances is physiologically
difficult due to the inability to focus, and in addition the anticipation
of the impacting drop often causes a blink and subsequent loss of portions
of the drop. As a result, the user may inadvertently permit the dropper
tip to contact the eye surface.
In any event, small amounts of eye liquids can thus be inadvertently
permitted to commingle with the liquid of the drop to be delivered. Thus,
when the pressure on the delivery container forcing the drop out is
relieved, a small amount of the mixed liquids may be drawn back into the
container. With time the bacteria originally present in the eye, both
normal and pathological, will be permitted access to a medium which may
cause them to proliferate. Thus, subsequent drops of medication may
reintroduce to the eye either excessive levels of typically present
bacteria, or large numbers of pathogens. Neither situation is acceptable.
To cope with the problems of contamination, drug manufacturers often
introduce an anti-bacterial agent to the drug container. In most cases,
this agent or preservative can be very effective at suppressing the growth
of bacterial contaminants within the container. Unfortunately, there
exists a significant population of patients for whom these preservatives
represent ocular irritants, or in more severe cases, cause allergic
reactions. Such untoward ocular reactions prevent such patients from using
the drug in this kind of packaging. For these patients, single-use,
non-preserved drug packaging is a partial answer, but at significantly
increased cost and inconvenience.
Of course, similar problems are encountered with other drop-administered
medicines, for example, for the ear or nose.
Container contamination can also be the result of particulate matter being
drawn back into the container with the liquid in the dropper tip that has
not been delivered as a drop. Over several drop deliveries in, for
example, dusty conditions, a significant accumulation of dust in the
container is possible. If the liquid to be delivered needs to be ultrapure
as, for example, in certain microelectronic applications, such
accumulation could raise a serious problem.
FLOW RATE
Dosage of drugs administered as drops is regulated on the basis of the
number of drops to be applied. Formation of the drops is directly related
to flow rate of the liquid from the container. The drops themselves fall
from the dropper tip when the weight of the pendant drop exceeds the
surface tension forces holding the drop to the dropper tip. In the ideal
case, each drop should be identical to the previous one. In practice,
however, other factors intervene to cause significant variation in drop
size. One of the most significant factors is the rate of drop formation.
If the drop is formed rapidly, more liquid can be "injected" into the body
of the drop as it is beginning to break free. These drops will be larger,
and thus will carry more drug, than if the container is squeezed very
slowly. In extreme circumstances, drug may be ejected in a steady stream.
While this is a minimal problem when the drugs are delivered by a trained
professional, it becomes significant when the drugs are delivered by the
patients themselves. The flow rate, which is directly related to the
finger pressure while squeezing, cannot be easily controlled. The visual
clue, that is, the growth of the drop itself, cannot be readily observed
if the eye is about to receive the same drop or if the dropper is not
positioned in the line of sight in use.
The problem of delivery control is not restricted to ophthalmic drugs, of
course, and there is a clear need for controllable addition devices in a
wide range of, for example, pharmaceutical dispensing applications.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
In the metering device defined in the present invention there is an
inherently greater resistance to liquid flow than in a metering device of
the prior art. For this reason, it becomes most difficult to produce a
continuous stream of liquid by squeezing the container. This resistance to
liquid flow also tends to damp out the natural variations in squeezing
force that occur from moment to moment during use of a metering device of
this type. As a result, the sequential drops metered from such a device
tend to have a much more uniform size.
It is therefore an object of this invention to provide a flow metering
device in which the problems of contamination and uncontrolled flow rate
are substantially reduced.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a dropper for ocular
medicines that is protected from inadvertent bacterial contamination and
thus permit a significant reduction or the complete elimination of
preservatives in the medicine.
It is another object of the invention to provide a liquid metering and
dispensing device in which a liquid, such as a medicine, is dispensed as
substantially uniform drops.
The above objects are provided by a device for dispensing a liquid in drop
form which comprises a container having a dropper tip comprising a
passage-way for ingress of air to and egress of liquid from the device,
the passageway communicating between the body of the container and an
orifice, means for temporarily reducing the volume of the container and,
disposed within the dropper tip, across the passageway and adjacent the
orifice, a composite microporous membrane with pores of a size to resist
the passage of undesired contamination, the membrane having a liquophilic
portion permitting delivery of metered drops of a liquid to a desired
location outside the container, and a liquophobic portion adapted to
resist the passage of such liquid but to permit the passage therethrough
of air being intersected by the membrane and portions. The surface area of
the liquophilic portion is so selected as to provide an appropriate drop
dispensing rate and avoid a stream of liquid from emerging from the
dropper tip.
The membrane is sealed to the inside surface of the dropper within the tip
region so as to prevent the passage of liquid around, as opposed to
through, the membrane.
The membrane comprises two components in side-by-side or juxtaposed
relationship. One component has a liquophobic character, that is, it
resists the passage of liquids. The other component has a liquophilic
character, that is, liquids pass through it readily. Thus, liquids exiting
the container through the porous membrane will pass exclusively through
the liquophilic component and will be rejected by the liquophobic
component. Liquids being sucked back into the container will pass
exclusively through the liquophilic component. However, air will flow into
the container to replace the expelled liquid through the liquophobic side.
THE CONTAINER
In use, the container functions as a reservoir for the liquid to be
dispensed. It is provided with means to temporarily to reduce its volume,
typically by providing that at least part of the container is elastically
deformable. Thus, pressure on a deformable portion of the container will
reduce the effective volume and force the liquid contained therein out of
the container when it is appropriately oriented.
After a desired number of drops have been expelled from the container and
the deforming pressure is removed, the liquid below the membrane in the
tip is drawn back into the container. It is preferred that this occurs as
a continuous column, that is, no droplets should break away and be left
behind in the tip area. Such droplets could be a hospitable environment
for bacterial growth and as such should be avoided so far as possible.
Making the volume of the tip area very small helps to minimize this
problem. It is, therefore, particularly preferred that the volume between
the orifice of the dropper and the surface of the composite membrane be as
small as possible. Volumes of the order of from about 0.001 to about 0.15
cm.sup.3 are suitable and most preferred are volumes of from about 0.05 to
about 0.1 cm.sup.3.
The tip area of the dropper can be designed to provide membrane support by
various means including, for example, a series of ribs on the inside
surface of the dropper tip and/or an interior beading providing a seating
surface to which the membrane can be bonded. Care should, however, be
exercised to ensure that such support devices do not impede or distort the
flow of metered drops from the device. Support could also be provided by
the provision of a transverse septum or bar that would help resist any
tendency of the membrane to deform under pressure.
WETTING OF POROUS MEDIA
The wettability or liquophilicity of a porous structure, e.g., a membrane,
is a function of that structure's critical wetting surface tension (CWST)
(discussed below) and the surface tension of the applied liquid. If the
CWST is at least as high as the surface tension of the liquid, the liquid
will spontaneously wet the porous structure, which may be termed
"liquophilic" with respect to that liquid. Conversely, if the CWST is
lower than the surface tension of the liquid then it will not be wet and
will be liquophobic with respect to that liquid.
When a liquid is brought into contact with the upstream surface of a porous
medium and a small pressure differential is applied, flow into and through
the porous medium may or may not occur. A condition in which no flow
occurs is that in which the liquid does not wet the material of which the
porous structure is made.
A series of liquids can be prepared, each with a surface tension about 3
dynes/cm higher compared with the one preceding. A drop of each may then
be placed on a porous surface and observed to determine whether it is
absorbed quickly, or remains on the surface. For example, applying this
technique to a 0.2 .mu.m porous polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane,
instant wetting is observed for a liquid with a surface tension of about
26 dynes/cm. However, the structure remains unwetted when a liquid with a
surface tension of about 29 dynes/cm is applied.
Similar behavior is observed for porous media made using other synthetic
resins, with the wet/unwet values dependent principally on the surface
characteristics of the material from which the porous medium is made and,
secondarily, on the pore size characteristics of the porous medium. For
example, fibrous polyester, specifically polybutylene terephthalate
(hereinafter "PBT") sheets which have pore diameters less than about 20
.mu.m will be wetted by a liquid with a surface tension of about 50
dynes/cm, but will not be wetted by a liquid with a surface tension of
about 54 dynes/cm.
In order to characterize this behavior of a porous membrane, the term
"critical wetting surface tension" (CWST) is defined as follows. The CWST
of a porous medium may be determined by individually applying to its
surface a series of liquids with surface tensions varying by about 2 to
about 4 dynes/cm, and observing the absorption or non-absorption of each
liquid. The CWST of a porous medium, in units of dynes/cm, is defined as
the mean value of the surface tension of the liquid which is absorbed and
that of a liquid of neighboring surface tension which is not absorbed.
Thus, in the examples of the two preceding paragraphs, the CWST's are
| | |