|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Biological calorimetry is a field primarily concerned with the measurement
of the heat effects produced in biochemical processes. There are two
categories of reaction processes of interest which produce heat while
reacting.
The first category of reactions are those between two chemical entities
(reactants M and X) to produce a third species (product MX), such as the
binding of a drug to a protein molecule to produce a drug/protein complex.
This binding (interriolecular) reaction is depicted by the chemical
reaction equation, M+X.fwdarw.MX.
The second category of reactions are those that result in a transformation
of the molecular state of a substance (from the reactant state M to the
product state M') due to an increase in temperature, such as the unfolding
of proteins and various nucleic acid structures or the melting of a lipid
suspension. This unfolding (intramolecular) reaction is depicted by the
chemical reaction equation, M.fwdarw.M'.
Typically, one measures the heat effects for binding (intermolecular)
reactions (i.e. the first category) using a conventional calorimeter by
mixing the reactants in a "reaction chamber" while monitoring the
temperature change in the reaction chamber with a thermometer or a
thermoelectric sensor. The temperature or voltage change is converted into
a unit of heat by calibrating the calorimeter against a standard heat
effect generated by the passage of electric current through a resistor
placed in the reaction chamber.
Similarly, one typically measures the heat effect due to unfolding
(intramolecular) reactions (i.e. the second category) using a scanning
calorimeter, which measures the heat effect produced upon increasing the
temperature of the contents of a reaction chamber.
Conventional methods of thermodynamic data collection for chemical
reactions tend to be very repetitive and time consuming. Using
conventional methods, the time required to determine the equilibrium
constant and enthalpy of the unfolding of a protein at eight different
values of PH can take between 3 to 8 days. Another limitation of
conventional methods is that two different devices are needed to measure
both binding (intermolecular) and unfolding (intramolecular) reactions. In
addition, the accuracy of a conventional reaction calorimeter is limited
by heat effects caused by stirring the reactants in the reaction chamber.
The use of conventional scanning calorimeters can be very time consuming
because scanning calorimeters tend to require lengthy temperature
equilibrium periods.
Therefore, a need exists for a single device which can determine heat
effects for both binding (intermolecular) and unfolding (intramolecular)
reactions with increased accuracy and in less time than traditional
methods.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a temperature gradient calorimeter with two
dimensional data collection capability for monitoring both type binding
(intermolecular) and unfolding (intramolecular) reactions involving
temperature changes with increased accuracy and which significantly
reduces the amount of time required for determining heat effects of
chemical reactions from traditional methods. The temperature gradient
calorimeter of the invention determines heats of reactions by correlating
reaction processes with differences in patterns of radiation intensity
changes (fluorescence preferred) that occur due to a fixed temperature
differential.
The calorimeter apparatus in general is comprised of wells forming a two
dimensional array of reaction chambers disposed in a thermally conductive
substrate. A preferred array is a horizontal row and vertical column
arrangement forming an x-y array where each row in the x-direction has
twelve wells and where each column in the y-direction has eight wells. A
first heat transfer medium at a first temperature T.sub.1 is in thermal
contact with the thermally conductive substrate at a first region of the
substrate. A second heat transfer medium at a different temperature
T.sub.2 is in thermal contact with the thermally conductive substrate at a
second region. The difference in temperatures between the first and second
heat transfer mediums produces a fixed and highly stable temperature
gradient T.sub.1 -T.sub.2 along the x-axis across the array of reaction
chambers disposed between the two regions.
The array of reaction chambers are filled with a measured amount of
premixed reactant solution. An x-y array would for example, have a
different pH in each row resulting in a variance of reaction conditions in
the y-axis. The fluorescence intensity in each reaction chamber is
measured with a sensoring device and converted to digitized data. The
result is the collection of fluorescence intensity data which provides a
fluorescence profile of the extent of reaction (degree of advancement)
across the temperature gradient. The digitized fluorescence profile data
is then processed in a computer which compares the data to stored data
concerning known relationships between the degree of advancement of
reaction and heat of reaction for known parameters, to determine the heat
of reaction and equilibrium constant for the reaction process under
consideration.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention
will be apparent from the following more particular description of
preferred embodiments of the drawings in which like reference characters
refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are
not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating
the principles of the invention.
FIG. 1 is a plan view of the present invention temperature gradient
calorimeter.
FIG. 2 is a section end view of the present invention temperature gradient
calorimeter.
FIGS. 3a-3b are a graphs illustrating two different temperature gradient
profiles across the array of wells.
FIG. 4 illustrates the fluorescence intensity profile across the array of
wells.
FIG. 5 is a graph showing an example of the change in fluorescence
intensity for an binding (intermolecular) reaction.
FIG. 6 is a graph showing an example of the change in fluorescence
intensity monitored as a function of temperature for an unfolding
(intramolecular) reaction.
FIG. 7 is plan view of a temperature gradient calorimeter having a coaxial
temperature gradient and a series of connecting canals for filling wells.
FIG. 8 is a section end view of the present invention having an environment
chamber.
FIG. 9 is a plan view of a segmented temperature gradient calorimeter.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
In FIGS. 1 and 2, an x-y array 15 (wherein x=12, y=8) of wells 14 are
formed, such as by drilling holes into a substrate 12 to form temperature
gradient calorimeter 10. In a preferred embodiment, substrate 12 is a
plate formed from a 6".times.3.5".times.0.5" block of copper.
Alternatively substrate 12 can be of various dimensions or shapes and can
be made of other thermally conductive materials such as saphire, silicon,
aluminum or stainless steel.
Flow tube 18 is located at one edge of the array of wells 14 and passes
through substrate 12 along region R.sub.1. Circulating pump P.sub.1
circulates water from water bath W.sub.1 through flow tube 18. Water bath
W.sub.1 is held at a constant temperature T.sub.1 by a heating coil (not
shown). Alternatively, a cooling coil may be used to maintain a constant
temperature in water bath W.sub.1. Copper tube 16 is located at an
opposite edge of the array and passes through reaction plate 12 along
region R.sub.2. Circulating pump P.sub.2 circulates water from water bath
W.sub.2 through flow tube 16. Water bath W.sub.2 is held at a constant
temperature T.sub.2 in similar fashion as water bath W.sub.1. The
temperatures T.sub.1 and T.sub.2 can range anywhere between 0.degree. C.
to 100.degree. C. In the preferred embodiment, flow tubes 16 and 18 are
made of copper. Alternatively, flow tubes 16 and 18 may be made of any
thermally conductive material such as aluminum and stainless steel. The
difference in temperature between flow tube 18 and flow tube 16 produces a
fixed and highly stable temperature gradient T.sub.1 -T.sub.2 across
substrate 12 and array 15.
In FIGS. 1 and 2, insulation 20 is provided to insulate substrate 12,
substantially isolating calorimeter 10 from the ambient temperature
surrounding calorimeter 10. Insulation 20 may be formed of Styrofoam.TM.
or any other material with good insulating properties can be used. Quartz
window 22 is also provided to cover the upper surface of substrate 12
thereby covering wells 14. Additionally, quartz window 22 also serves to
isolate wells 14 from the surrounding ambient temperature. Alternatively,
window 22 can be made of other transparent materials. By isolating
calorimeter 10 from the surrounding ambient temperature with insulation 20
and quartz window 22, the temperature gradient T.sub.1 -T.sub.2 remains
fixed and stable.
The wells 14, which make up array 15, preferably have a volume of 250 .mu.l
with the dimensions being about 1/4" in diameter and 5/16" deep.
Alternatively, the volume of wells 14 can be of various volumes or shapes.
Wells 14 are coated with a chemically inert and optically reflective
material having good thermal conductive properties. In the preferred
embodiment, wells 14 are plated with a thin layer of gold. Alternatively,
wells 14 can be coated with polytetrafluoroethylene. Additionally, wells
14 can consist of removable wells made of quartz, glass or
polytetrafluoroethylene.
Array 15 is filled with a reactant solution using the following method.
First, the top horizontal row of wells 14 is filled with reactant solution
at a known pH level. Each well 14 is filled with a measured volume (250
.mu.l) of reactant solution. For binding (intermolecular) reactions, a
known amount of protein is titrated with varying amounts of a reactant
agent across the row of wells 14 where the amount of reactant agent in
each well 14 increases across the row. For an unfolding reaction
(intramolecular reaction) no titrating is performed. Second, the row of
wells directly below the top row is filled with a reactant solution at a
different pH level than the top row. For binding (intermolecular)
reactions, the reactant solution is titrated in the same manner as that in
the top row. The process is repeated for each suceeding row where each
horizontal row is filled with reactant solution at a different pH level.
Alternatively, each row of wells 14 may contain a different chemical
additive instead of having different pH levels. The reactants are mixed
before being placed in wells 14, thus the need to stir reactant solutions
in wells 14 is avoided along with the undesired heat effects due to
stirring.
The 12.times.8 array 15 allows data to be collected in two dimensions for
testing a reactant solution at eight different pH levels or with eight
different chemical additives at twelve different temperatures. In two
dimensional data collecting, each horizontal row of twelve wells 14 would
be at a different pH level or have a different chemical additive included.
Alternatively, the number of wells in the array may be increased or
decreased.
In the preferred embodiment, fluorescence sensor 100 is located directly
above array 15. Fiber optic device 104 is housed within fluorescence
sensor 100 and two stepping motors (not shown) move fiber optic device 104
in a x-axis and a y-axis. Fiber optic device 104 moves over each well 14
of array 15 and measures the fluorescence intensity emitted by the
reactant solution sample held in each well 14 after the equilibrium of the
reaction has been attained. Fiber optic cable 106 connects fiber optic
device 104 to fluorescence spectrometer 102. Fluorescence spectrometer 102
converts the fluorescence intensity read by fiber optic device 104 into
digital data.
In the preferred embodiment the raw data from the fluorescence measurements
is processed into a computer 110 (FIG. 1) which, using the above
equations, computes the values for the heat of reaction .DELTA.H and the
degree of advancement of the reaction e. The apparatus and method of the
present invention can determine the heat of reaction and equilibrium
constant for both inter and intramolecular reactions at several different
values of pH in about 1 hour. The same results would take 3 to 8 days
using conventional methods.
Both intermolecular and intramolecular reactions often take place with a
change in fluorescence intensity. For example, for an unfolding
(intramolecular) reaction, the unfolding of a protein in a sample of
reactant solution can be detected by sensing the corresponding change in
fluorescence intensity emitted by the sample of reactant solution.
Furthermore, for a binding (intermolecular) reaction, the binding of a
reactant agent to a protein in a sample of reactant solution can be
detected by sensing the corresponding change in fluoresence intensity.
Fluorescence measurements are highly sensitive and only minute amounts of
reactant materials are required. This translates into significant savings
for situations where proteins must be isolated by costly purification
methods.
Alternatively, the radiational intensity emitted by a sample reactant
solution can be measured by means other than measuring fluorescence
intensity such as by measuring radioactively labelled materials, measuring
luminescence, measuring the absorption of ultraviolet radiation or
measuring the absorption of visible radiation.
The extent of reaction taking place in a given well 14 (FIG. 1) is
dependent on temperature and concentration of an added agent. For example,
in a binding (intermolecular) reaction, a different amount of protein will
bind with a fixed amount of reactant agent at different temperatures.
Therefore, the extent of reaction for a reactant solution varies across
the x-direction of array 15 due to the temperature gradient across array
15 and varies across the y-direction due to a change in concentration of a
reactant agent. FIG. 3a provides an example of a further representation of
the extent of reaction of a drug with a protein as a function of
temperature and concentration of the drug which binds to the protein. In
the temperature gradient calorimeter 10 (FIG. 1), the concentration
variation is achieved by mixing solutions before dispensing into the wells
14 of array 15. The temperature gradient is established as described
above. FIG. 4 illustrates two examples of temperature gradients across
array 15 (FIG. 1) as a function of well position on the x-axis. Due to the
temperature gradient across array 15, each vertical column of eight wells
14 in the y-axis is at a different temperature than any of the other
columns and each well 14 in a column is at the same temperature. FIG. 3b
illustrates this change in the extent of reaction with a corresponding
change in fluorescence intensity across array 15. Array 15 is identified
in FIG. 3b by horizontal rows indicated as "a" through "h" and by vertical
columns indicated as 1 through 12. The temperature gradient moves
horizontally from vertical columns 1 through 12. The fluorescence
intensity of the reactant solution held in array 15 varies with the change
in temperature across array 15 and also with the change in concentration
of a reactant agent vertically along array 15.
Once the fluorescence patterns of the reactant samples are measured, the
heats of reactions can be determined by correlating reaction processes
with differences in patterns of fluorescence intensity changes that occur
due to a fixed temperature differential. Thermodynamic principles provide
that the variation of the equilibrium constant with temperature is
proportional to the heat of the reaction (also called the enthalpy of the
reaction). This principle is summarized by the following mathematical
expression:
##EQU1##
where: K is the equilibrium constant
.pi. is the reciprocal absolute temperature
.DELTA.H is heat change for the reaction
R is the gas constant.
Equation (1) can be expressed in terms of .DELTA.H where:
##EQU2##
The temperature gradient calorimetry method provides a measure of the heat
of the reaction by providing the necessary information on the right hand
side of equation [2], namely the variation of the equilibrium constant K
with temperature.
The equilibrium constant K is also related to a quantity known as the
degree of advancement of the reaction .THETA., which reflects the relative
amount of a reaction mixture that has been converted to products.
Determining the heats of reaction for a binding (intermolecular) reaction
and an unfolding (intramolecular) reaction requires the use of different
sets of equations.
For a binding (intermolecular) reaction (M+X.fwdarw.MX), the equilibrium
constant can be expressed in terms of the degree advancement of reaction
.THETA. as:
K=.THETA./[(1-.THETA.)x] [3]
where x is the free (unreacted) concentration of the reactant X.
Substituting equation [3] into equation [2] results in:
##EQU3##
The degree of advancement of the reaction at a fixed temperature column in
the array can be expressed by:
##EQU4##
where .DELTA.F is the change in fluorescence intensity from one well site
to the next adjacent well site
.DELTA.F.sub.total is the total change in fluorescence intensity over a
fixed temperature column
x is the free ligand concentration of X
K(T) is the equilibrium constant at a given temperature.
Once the fluorescence intensity for a binding (intermolecular) reaction has
been measured across array 15 (FIG. 1), the resulting data can be graphed.
FIG. 5 is a graph depicting fluorescence intensity versus the relative
amount of added reactant for a given fixed temperature column. A value of
the equilibrium constant at that temperature, K(T), can be extracted from
the data by equation (5), by considering that the free ligand
concentration x is determined in the fit by the positive solution to:
Kx.sup.2 +(1+kM.sub.T -kX.sub.T)-X.sub.T =0 [6]
where M.sub.T and X.sub.T are the total concentrations of protein and
ligand in the sample wells respectively. Values of .DELTA.F.sub.total and
K(T) are determined in the fitting procedure. This procedure is carried
out for each constant temperature column so that a set of K(T)'s at
different temperatures are collected. Equation [2] is then used to compute
the heat of the reaction, .DELTA.H.
Some of the equations used in determining the heats of reaction for an
unfolding (intramolecular) reaction are different than those used for a
binding (intermolecular) reaction. For an unfolding (intramolecular)
reaction (M.fwdarw.M'), the equilibrium constant can be expressed in terms
of the degree of advancement of a reaction as:
K=.THETA./(1-.THETA.) [7]
The substitution of equation [7] into equation [2] results in:
##EQU5##
FIG. 6 is a graph of raw data showing fluorescence intensity monitored as a
function of temperature for a given horizontal row used in monitoring the
unfolding of a protein. The curve of the data points shown in FIG. 6 is
approximated by the equation:
I(T)=I.sub.m (T)+[I.sub.m (T)-I.sub.m (T)].THETA. [9]
where:
I.sub.m (T)=a+bT [10]
and
I.sub.m (T)=c+dT [11]
The degree of advancement of the reaction can be expressed by:
##EQU6##
where .tau. is the reciprocal temperature in degrees Kelvin, and a, b, c,
d, .tau..sub.M and .DELTA.H are constants determined in the fitting
procedure.
An alternative embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 7 where
temperature gradient calorimeter 40 is circular rather than rectangular.
Flow tube 42, maintained at temperature T.sub.1 , is in thermal contact
with region R.sub.1 at the center of substrate 46. Flow tube 44,
maintained at temperature T.sub.2 is in thermal contact with region
R.sub.2 at the outer edge of substrate 46. The difference in temperature
T.sub.1 -T.sub.2 between flow tube 42 at region R.sub.1 and f low tube 44
at region R.sub.2 produces a radial temperature gradient between regions
R.sub.1 and R.sub.2.
Rho/theta array 56 of wells 14 is located within the temperature gradient
between regions R.sub.1 and R.sub.2. Array 56 is made up of a number of
equally spaced rows 58 of wells 14 extending radially outward from R.sub.1
across the temperature gradient towards region R.sub.2. Valves 50 permits
a measured amount of reactant solution from reservior 54 to enter canals
48 via trough 52. Canals 48 connect each well 14 of a row 58. Canals 48
allow an entire row 58 of wells 14 to be filled at the same time with
reactant solution.
FIG. 8 shows an alternative embodiment of the present invention where
temperature gradient calorimeter 60 maintains a constant protein
concentration in sample well 14, but changes the concentration (in sample
well 14) of an agent which binds to it, such as the binding of oxygen to
hemoglobin or whole blood. This is made possible by environment chamber 66
which exchanges gases between sample wells 14 and environment chamber 66
through membrane 64, where environment chamber 66 is a gas phase dialysate
chamber and membrane 64 is a gas-permeable membrane. Sample wells 14 pass
through substrate 68 so that membrane 64 makes up the bottom of sample
wells 14, separating wells 14 from environment chamber 66. Sample window
62 covers the top of sample wells 14. Alternatively, environment chamber
66 can be a liquid dialysate chamber and membrane 64 can be a
semi-permeable membrane allowing liquids rather than gases to pass from
environment chamber 66 to wells 14.
FIG. 9 shows a segmented temperature gradient calorimeter 70. In this
alternative embodiment of the present invention, a number of individual
substrates 72 make up calorimeter 70. Each individual substrate 72
contains a vertical column 74 of wells 14 and is individually cooled or
heated. The individual substrates 72 are thermally isolated from each
other by an insulating material. The temperature of each adjacent
substrate 72 can be in ascending or descending temperature so that the
overall effect is a stepped temperature gradient over calorimeter 70.
While this invention has been particularly shown and described with
references to preferred embodiment thereof, it will be understood by those
skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made
therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as
defined by the appended claims.
* * * * *
|
|
|
|
|
Description  |
|