WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Identification apparatus and methods    
United States Patent5302954   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/5302954.html
Inventor(s)Brooks; David R. (Perth, AU); Murdoch; Graham A. M. (Perth, AU)
AbstractAn identification system comprising a transponder having receiver means adapted to extract powering energy from a surrounding electromagnet field, transponder transmitter means adapted to transmit at least one unique signal from the transponder, frequency generating means for generating a plurality of pre-determined frequencies, each frequency adapted to carry the signal from the transmitter means to an interrogator receiver means adapted to receive said signals to achieve identification of said transponder, said transponder transmitting signals successively or repetitively using at each successive or repetitive transmission a newly selected frequency or set of newly selected frequencies.



 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History
Drawing from US Patent 5302954
Identification apparatus and methods - US Patent 5302954 Drawing
Identification apparatus and methods
Inventor     Brooks; David R. (Perth, AU); Murdoch; Graham A. M. (Perth, AU)
Owner/Assignee     Magellan Corporation (Australia) Pty. Ltd. (Perth, AU)
Patent assignment
All assignments
Publication Date     April 12, 1994
Application Number     07/978,033
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     November 18, 1992
US Classification     342/44 342/51
Int'l Classification     G01S 013/80
Examiner     Sotomayor; John B.
Assistant Examiner    
Attorney/Law Firm     Baker & Daniels
Address
Parent Case     This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 07/499,296, filed May 17, 1990, now abandoned.
Priority Data     Dec 04, 1987[AU]P15744
USPTO Field of Search     342/42 342/44 342/51
Patent Tags     identification methods
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
3886548



[0 after 0 votes]
3689885
Suzuki
713/340
May,2006

[0 after 0 votes]
5051741
Wesby
340/825.49
Sep,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
5043903
Constant
701/300
Aug,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
5029182
Cai
375/136
Jul,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
4963887
Kawashima
342/44
Oct,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4931788
Creswick
340/10.33
Jun,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4862176
Voles
342/45
Aug,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4850036
Smith
455/502
Jul,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4829540
Waggener, Sr.
375/133
May,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4786903
Grindahl
340/10.4
Nov,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4725841
Nysen
342/44
Feb,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4694466
Kadin
375/136
Sep,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
4612652
Kadin
375/134
Sep,1986

[0 after 0 votes]
4606041
Kadin
375/134
Aug,1986

[0 after 0 votes]
4558453
Mimken
375/137
Dec,1985

[0 after 0 votes]
4554668
Deman
375/133
Nov,1985

[0 after 0 votes]
4551712
Fockens
340/572.2
Nov,1985

[0 after 0 votes]
4510495
Sigrimis
340/10.34
Apr,1985

[0 after 0 votes]
4388524
Walton
235/380
Jun,1983

[0 after 0 votes]
4364043
Cole
340/10.34
Dec,1982

[0 after 0 votes]
4350982
Alpers
342/42
Sep,1982

[0 after 0 votes]
4297700
Nard
342/125
Oct,1981

[0 after 0 votes]
4209783
Ohyama
340/825
Jun,1980

[0 after 0 votes]
4206462
Rabow
342/60
Jun,1980

[0 after 0 votes]
4144534
Prickett
342/43
Mar,1979

[0 after 0 votes]
4114151
Denne
342/44
Sep,1978

[0 after 0 votes]
4095226
Kratzer

Jun,1978

[0 after 0 votes]
4034371
Maier
342/43
Jul,1977

[0 after 0 votes]
4023167
Wahlstrom
342/42
May,1977

[0 after 0 votes]
4006477
Yost, Jr.
342/51
Feb,1977

[0 after 0 votes]
3964024
Hutton
340/10.34
Jun,1976

[0 after 0 votes]
3945006
Cleeton
342/45
Mar,1976

[0 after 0 votes]
3911434
Cook
342/50
Oct,1975

[0 after 0 votes]
3887916
Goyer
342/30
Jun,1975

[0 after 0 votes]
3878528
Majeau
342/44
Apr,1975

[0 after 0 votes]
3750168
Schrader
342/30
Jul,1973

[0 after 0 votes]
3737911
Sakuragi
340/10.4
Jun,1973

[0 after 0 votes]
3701150
Dame
342/42
Oct,1972

[0 after 0 votes]
3611379
Deckett
324/316
Oct,1971

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


We claim:

1. In a system for multiple device identification and communication of data having an interrogating station for interrogating a plurality of transponders wherein the interrogating station is capable of receiving communications from said transponders via carrier frequencies, each said transponder comprising:

transmitter means adapted, when the transponder is interrogated by the interrogating station, to transmit an information signal via a carrier signal having a frequency selected from a set of possible carrier signal frequencies; and

frequency generating means for selectively generating the set of possible carrier signal frequencies;

the information signal being transmitted successively or repetitively using at each transmission a newly selected carrier signal frequency or set of newly selected carrier signal frequencies;

wherein the frequency of the newly selected carrier signal frequency or set of newly selected carrier signal frequencies is selected independent of external influence and independent of external knowledge by the interrogating station.

2. A transponder as claimed in claim 1, wherein selection of the carrier signal frequency from the set of possible carrier signal frequencies is random.

3. A system as claimed in claim 1, wherein only one carrier signal is selected at each transmission.

4. A system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the transmitter means is adapted to go to an idle state or transmit on a redundant channel in order to provide a break in transmission for a predetermined period of time.

5. A system as claimed in claim 1, wherein each carrier signal generated is assigned a probability weighting in accordance with a desired use of each carrier signal at each transmission.

6. A system as claimed in claim 1, wherein frequency of the set of possible carrier signals is programmed in the transponder from an external source.

7. A system as claimed in claim 1, further comprising a tuned pickup coil adapted to extract power, tuning signal and/or information signals from an externally applied magnetic field.

8. A system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the information signal is a unique signal identifiable with the transponder.

9. An identification system as claimed in claim 1, and including system receiver means for receiving each information signal simultaneously.

10. An identification system as claimed in claim 9, wherein the receiver means further includes logic means for ignoring information signals having the same newly selected frequency.

11. The system of claim 1 wherein the interrogating station is capable of identifying and receiving communications from two or more of said transponders simultaneously.

12. The system of claim 7 wherein the interrogating station is capable of identifying and receiving communications from two or more of said transponders simultaneously.

13. In a system for multiple device identification and communication of data having an interrogating station for interrogating a plurality of transponders wherein the interrogating station is capable of receiving communications from said transponders via carrier frequencies, each said transponder comprising:

logic means adapted to provide an information signal for transmission by said transponder;

transmitter means adapted to transmit the informational signal;

frequency generating means adapted to provide a set of possible carrier signal frequencies greater than two in number, at least one of the carrier signal frequencies being available for transmission of the information signal at each transmission of the information signal; and

carrier signal selection means adapted to select at least on of the carrier signal frequencies from the set of possible carrier signal frequencies at each transmission of the information signal, the frequency selected for each transmission of the information signal being determined internal of the transponder independent of external knowledge and external influence by the interrogating station.

14. A system as claimed in claim 13, wherein upon receipt of an external selection signal, the carrier signal selection means selects or reselects at least one of the carrier signals for transmission.

15. A system as claimed in claim 13, wherein selection of the carrier signal frequency from the set of possible carrier signal frequencies is random.

16. A system as claimed in claim 13, wherein only one carrier signal is selected at each transmission.

17. A system as claimed in claim 13, wherein the transmitter means is adapted to go to an idle state or transmit on a redundant channel in order to provide a break in transmission for a predetermined period of time.

18. A system as claimed in claim 13, wherein each carrier signal generated is assigned a probability weighting in accordance with a desired use of each carrier signal at each transmission.

19. A system as claimed in claim 13, wherein frequency of the set of possible carrier signals is programmed in the transponder from an external source.

20. A system as claimed in claim 13, further comprising a tuned pickup coil adapted to extract power, tuning signal and/or information signals from an externally applied magnetic field.

21. A system as claimed in claim 13, wherein the information signal is a unique signal identifiable with the transponder.

22. An identification system as claimed in claim 13, and including system receiver means for receiving each information signal simultaneously.

23. The system of claim 13 wherein the interrogating station is capable of identifying and receiving communications from two or more of said transponders simultaneously.

24. A system of device identification comprising;

at least two identifiable devices and a device identifier adapted to communicate with said devices by interrogating the devices and receiving data signals from said devices, said identifier adapted to receive signals simultaneously from a plurality of said devices, wherein,

each identifiable device includes transmitter means adapted to transmit a data signal to the identifier,

each transmitter means being adapted to transmit said data signal via a respective carrier signal, the frequency of the carrier signal being selected by each respective device from a predetermined set of carrier signal frequencies greater than two in number, the frequency of each carrier signal being determined internal of each respective device independent of external knowledge and external influence by the identifier.

25. A system as claimed in claim 24, wherein each device is embodied in a VLSI chip.

26. A system as claimed in claim 24, further comprising comparison means adapted to disregard corrupted signals received simultaneously from each device.

27. A system as claimed in claim 24, wherein each device is a passive device.

28. A system as claimed in claim 24, including means for phase coherently generating the newly selected carrier signal using an external powering field as a frequency reference.

29. A system as claimed in claim 24, including means for generating the newly selected carrier signal frequency using at least one phase-locked loop frequency multiplier, and subsequently dividing the carrier signal frequency to obtain a desired frequency of the carrier signal.

30. A system as claimed in claim 29, including means for ignoring frequencies which correspond to harmonics of the powering field.

31. A system as claimed in claim 24, wherein each transmitter means transmits the data signal asynchronously.

32. The system of claim 24 wherein said device identifier is adapted to identify and communicate simultaneously with two or more of said identifiable devices by simultaneously receiving data signals from said two or more identifiable devices.

33. A method of communication between an interrogator and at least one remote device, said method comprising the steps of:

the interrogator interrogating one or more of said remote devices,

each remote device generating a first signal for transmission via a carrier signal at a frequency selected by each respective remote device from a respective predetermined set of carrier signal frequencies, the frequency of the carrier signal being determined by each remote device,

transmitting said first signal from each remote device to the interrogator, and

generating and transmitting the first signal successively or repetitively at each transmission via a new carrier signal, the frequency of the new carrier signal being newly selected internal of each remote device and independent of external knowledge and influence by the interrogator.

34. A method as claimed in claim 33, wherein each remote device transmits the first signal to the interrogator simultaneously.

35. A method as claimed in claim 33, wherein the first signal includes a code unique to each remote device.

36. The method of claim 33 wherein the interrogator identifies and communicates simultaneously with two or more of said remote devices by receiving respective signals simultaneously from said two or more devices.

37. In a system for communication between an interrogating station for interrogating a plurality of transponders wherein the interrogating station includes a receiver that is capable of receiving communication from the transponders via carrier frequencies, wherein each said transponder is adapted for asynchronous communication with the external receiver, said transponder including:

transmitter means adapted to transmit asynchronously at least one signal from the transponder to the external receiver,

frequency generating means adapted to provide a predetermined set of possible carrier frequencies,

the transmitter means being adapted to transmit the at least one signal at a frequency selected from the predetermined set of possible carrier frequencies independent of external knowledge and external influence by said interrogating station.

38. The system of claim 37 wherein the interrogating station is capable of identifying and receiving communications from two or more of said transponders simultaneously.

39. A system as claimed in claim 1, wherein transmission by each transponder is asynchronous.
 Description Submit all comments and votes
 


FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention relates to a system of multiple device identification. The present invention further relates to a system utilising a plurality of remote devices and/or passive labels, the passive labels being adapted to extract energy from an applied magnetic field, the energy enabling transmission by the label of a signal, unique or coded, to be identified by a receiver, the remote devices being powered so as to transmit said signal, unique or coded. Each label or device can transmit simultaneously. Transmitting and receiving apparatus and methods of the system are also herein contemplated. The present invention in a preferred form is suitable for transponder (or a plurality thereof) identification.

PRIOR ART

Conventional passive identification or transponder systems known to Applicant utilise a system in which a single common carrier frequency is used to transmit data or identification codes from and/or to each transponder. Simultaneous transmission by more than one transponder results in co-interference between the signals so transmitted and prevent correct identification of any of the transmitting transponders i.e. simultaneous transmission gives rise to corrupted signal(s).

Furthermore, the Applicant is aware of AU-A-70052/87 which describes a radio meter reading system that is designed to correctly read signals from several transponders simultaneously. The system utilises a "wake-up" signal from the interrogation station to activate a battery powered transmitter in each transponder. Data containing amongst other things the transponders ID and the meter reading modulates a transmitted carrier signal. The frequency of the transmitted carrier signal is randomly varied using a frequency control voltage derived from a digital pseudo-random generator. The transmitter is designed to keep these carrier frequencies within an allowed band.

The system disclosed is not capable of precisely controlling the carrier frequencies. Consequently, direct coherent detection of the transponder signals is not possible. Powering of the receiving circuitry for detecting the "wake-up" si