|
|
|
| United States Patent | 5372421 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/5372421.html |
| Inventor(s) | Pardikes; Dennis (12811 S. 82nd Ct., Palos Park, IL 60464) |
| Abstract | The inventive method inverts and activates polymer, and delivers it to an
output at a relatively high concentration of polymer in an electrolyte
fluid, such as water. The inversion and activation results from four
steps: (1) premixing polymer and a diluent, (2) blending the premixed
polymer/diluent in a derated centrifugal pump, (3) recycling a portion of
the blended mix, and (4) suddenly relaxing the pressure to relax the
polymer in the blended polymer/diluent mixture. A secondary source of the
fluid is applied at the output to the high concentration in order to
dilute it to a desired level of concentration. A pilot controlled valving
system controls the secondary source of the fluid and maintains a uniform
dilution despite any fluctuation in the delivery of the fluid to the
activating system. A sensor at the output feeds back a control signal to
maintain a uniform level of polymer activity in the outflow from the
system. A check valve monitoring system gives an alarm if water seeps back
toward a source of polymer which is to be activated. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing from US Patent 5372421 |
|
|
Method of inverting, mixing, and activating polymers |
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
December 13, 1994 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
February 3, 1993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parent Case |
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application is a continuation of Ser. No. 07/540,910, filed Jun. 20,
1990 (now abandoned), which was a continuation-in-part of Ser. No.
07/352,689, filed May. 10, 1989, (now abandoned) which was, in turn, a
continuation of Ser. No. 07/139,075 filed Dec. 28, 1987, now abandoned,
which was, in turn, a continuation of Ser. No. 06/871,066 filed Jun. 5,
1986, now abandoned. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND
This invention relates to means for and methods of mixing and activating or
inverting polymers, at a high speed, and in either batch or continuous
loads, while being able to control, select and maintain polymer
concentration and activation.
The term "activation" is widely used to describe the chemical transition of
polymer to a usable form. Recently, the terminology has tended to focus on
how much activation has occurred with some arguing that there must be 100%
activation before the word can be used. Since nothing is ever perfect, it
is seen that if this argument is carried to the extreme, very little
polymer would ever be 100% activated. As used herein, no such fine level
of distinction is made. The word "activated", in its many forms, is
intended to encompass the start of the process and everything occurring
thereafter. Perhaps the word "inversion" might be more appropriate since
it applies regardless of the degree of completion of the activating
process.
Liquid or emulsion polymers are ionic-charged organic molecules which are
soluble in water or another electrolytic fluid, which are herinafter
simply called "water". Unactivated or neat polymers are encased by an oil
carrier. In this phase, the molecule is coiled upon itself in a microgel
form suspended in the oil carrier. Due to its charge, it tries to uncoil,
but the oil carrier overcomes the charge and keeps it coiled.
Liquid polymers are used by various industries to simplify their industrial
processes and make them more economical. For example, liquid polymers may
be used for water purification and flocculation; may be used in automotive
paint spray booths; may be used in the chemical industry to separate
inorganics and solids from plant effluent; may be used in the coal
industry to promote solids settling and to float coal fines; may be used
in the petro-chemical industry to enhance oil recovery; may be used in the
phosphate industry to improve recovery; may be used in the pulp and paper
industry as dewatering aids and retention aids; or may be used in the
steel industry to settle wastes. Those familiar with this art will readily
perceive many other uses in many other industries.
Usually polymers are manufactured and shipped in a deactivated form to a
location where they will be used. At that location, it is necessary to
activate or invert the polymers before they can be used. Usually, that
means that a polymer must be mixed with water or other electrolyte
(solvent), or with a chemical, to provide an electrolyte which can change
the polymer from an inactive state into an active state which can be so
mixed. The process for so converting the polymer into an active state is
one of imparting a sufficient amount of energy to the polymer. Reference
may be made to U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,057,223, 4,218,147 and 4,217,145 for
examples of prior art polymer activating systems.
The polymer encased in the oil phase is inactive. Therefore, its
hydrocarbon surroundings must be emulsified or broken to allow the ionic
molecule to uncoil or hydrate. This process of hydration is called
activation or inversion. The way in which emulsion polymers are activated
are to dilute them with water and to add enough mixing energy to emulsify
the oil carrier and thus to enable the ionic charged molecule to uncoil.
More particularly, the energy imparted to the inactive polymer includes a
mechanical agitation which breaks down the hydrocarbon carrier phase, and
thus enables water to reach and react with the long coiled molecule. Once
that molecule is in water, like charges on the molecule repel each ocher
and the molecule straightens and changes from the coil into a long and
more or less straight "conformation". Until this conformational
rearrangement occurs, the molecule is useless for most purposes.
The exact amount of energy required for an emulsion polymer activation is
not known. However, there is an increase in the viscosity of the polymer,
which is proportional to its stage of activation. This increase in
viscosity is due to the uncoiled molecules intertwining with each other.
The uncoiling of the molecules provide active sites for the attachment of
foreign material in a medium. Then, the increased weight on these
molecules settles them, carrying with them the settled material.
In the utilization of emulsion polymers, care must be taken to properly
prepare the polymer. Different polymers require different amounts of
energy for activation, tougher polymers require more force, while others
need less force. Further, care must be taken not to overshear the
molecules. Overshearing tends to break the uncoiled molecules, thus
lowering their viscosity and making them less effective. Undershearing
also is deleterious in that the polymer is then inefficient and
uneconomical.
The known activating systems have required relatively long periods of time
(such as an hour or so) in order to, for example, complete the inversion
of the polymer. This long period of time increases the requirements for
holding tanks during activation. Therefore, the relatively long period of
activation time is relatively expensive. Also, the requirement for such a
long term for activation greatly increases the capital requirements for
the purchase of machinery when a system is operating continuously, as
opposed to a batch system. Thus a faster polymer activating system is
highly desired.
Primarily, the prior art used the batch method to invert liquid polymers.
Polymer and water are delivered to a common mixing tank. Once in the tank,
the solution is beat or mixed for a specific length of time in order to
impart energy thereto. After mixing, the resulting solution must age to
allow enough time for the molecules to unwind.
There are many different kinds of polymers which leads to a plethora of
application requirements. It might be easy to build an entirely new custom
designed system or machine for each and every different polymer activation
job; however, the cost would then become prohibitive. This highlights the
need for a great flexibility for a polymer activation system or machine,
which in turn leads to the need for alternative mechanisms which may be
added to or removed from the activating hydraulic circuits according to
the then current needs.
One way to satisfy both the greater flexibility and a reduced system cost
is to adjust the system to process a greater concentration of polymer. For
example, instead of producing an output fluid which is 1% polymer, the
system may be adjusted to produce a more concentrated fluid which is 2%
polymer. Then, the concentrated 2% outflow may be diluted downstream to
become 1% polymer, which would double the volume produced by a relatively
small machine, to become the volume of a machine of twice the size, if it
was originally designed to process a polymer as a 1% fluid. The activation
process continues long after the discharge of the inverted polymer from
the system outlet.
Merely adding more water in the primary dilution of a polymer might very
likely wash away necessary inverting agents, called "activators" or
surfactants which are useful in emulsifying the hydrocarbon carrier. For
example, a particular use of a particular polymer might require a tenth
percent (0.1) polymer solution, but the polymer would lose necessary
chemical components if an effort is made to dilute the polymer this much
in a single pass through the system. Once a polymer is inverted, there is
little, if any, need for retaining these chemical activators. Therefore,
the invention presents the opportunity to invert a polymer solution to,
say, one percent. (1.0) Once the polymer is inverted, the solution may be
diluted downstream to reduce the one percent solution to become a tenth
percent solution. Hence, in this example, with the invention, it is
possible to produce a tenth percent solution that could not have been
produced heretofore.
Two examples of dilution systems which have been designed with these
thoughts in mind are found in Rosenberger's and Brazelton's U.S. Pat. Nos.
4,128,147 and 4,642,222. Each of these patents shows a method of adding
dilution water to an inverted polymer as it exits a system, thereby
theoretically enabling the system to deliver higher concentrations of
polymer which are then diluted to give a greater volume of total output.
However, it is thought that each of these patents contain basic design
flaws since each subjects activated polymers to abrupt pressure changes or
additional mixing once the polymer has reached its extended state. That is
the output lines of these patents include pressure regulators and/or
mixing devices which will create a higher upstream pressure as compared to
a lower downstream pressure. Once a polymer is activated, such a pressure
change or additional mixing may cause shear and break the now linear
polymer molecule, thereby damaging or destroying the polymer.
According to FIG. 1 of the Rosenberger patent the polymer solution is
subject to a pressure drop as it passes through the second fixed flow rate
regulator. Brazelton teaches the reduction or increase in the input of
polymer flow to his mixing system instead of varying the water flow.
SUMMARY
Accordingly, an object of the invention is to provide new and improved
means for and methods of activating polymers.
Another object of the invention is to provide flexible polymer activating
systems or machines, which may be adapted to fit the needs of particular
polymers which are being processed. In particular, an object is to provide
means for activating concentrated polymer solutions and for thereafter
introducing downstream a secondary dilution to bring the concentrate into
a useful range before the molecules become fully hydrated.
Yet another object of the invention is to provide an efficient system and
method for activating liquid polymers. Here an object is to provide an
automatic, continuous system which is able to vary the output rate of
inverted polymer, while automatically maintaining the amount of energy
imparted thereto and while maintaining a desired concentration of the
polymer.
In particular, an object is to monitor the level of active solids in an
outflow from the system and to provide system control functions in
response to the level detected during the monitoring in order to maintain
greater stability.
In keeping with an aspect of the invention, the activation of a polymer
occurs in four stages, which are: pre-mixing, blending, recycling, and a
final sudden pressure reduction. The pre-mixing occurs in a manifold
containing a static mixer. The blending occurs within a centrifugal pump
where water is blended with the polymer. The outflowing stream from the
centrifugal pump divides with part of the outflow feeding back through the
static mixer and centrifugal pump. The other divided part of the outflow
is delivered to a mixing pressure regulator where the pressure imparted by
the centrifugal pump is suddenly reduced to, or near, atmospheric
pressure. This suddenly relaxes the coiled, long polymer molecule to
hasten its straightening. This system provides three different kinds of
shear which are imparted during the inversion of the polymer fluid. First,
there is a boundary layer shear occurring in the centrifugal pump. Second,
there is a visco-elastic shear at an orifice where the polymer fluid flows
faster at the center of the orifice than at the periphery of the orifice.
Third, there is a structuring shear when the pressure suddenly reduces as
the polymer solution passes through the mixing pressure regulator. In one
exemplary inventive system, the entire inversion requires only about one
second.
The invention enables an adjustment which controls the amount of energy
introduced into the polymer for inversion. Once the relationship between
the amount of introduced energy and the output rate is established, the
inventive system automatically compensates for variations therein.
The system also provides controls for varying the concentration of the
polymer. A secondary fluid delivery system may dilute the concentrated
polymer after it is inverted.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
Preferred embodiments of the invention are shown in the attached drawings,
wherein:
FIG. 1 schematically shows the principles of an inventive system having two
inputs, which are for water and for the polymer that is to activated;
FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a pre-mixing manifold;
FIGS. 3A and B are two plan views (rotated by 90.degree. from each other) a
static mixer which is used inside the manifold of FIG. 2;
FIG. 4 is an end view of the static mixer, taken along line 4--4 in FIG.
3A; and
FIG. 5 is a schematic showing of a more sophisticated version of the system
of FIG. 1 with provisions for introducing one or more chemicals which may
be used in the electrolyte for activating the polymer;
FIG. 6 is a front plan view of a system incorporating the invention;
FIG. 7 is a plan view of the inventive system taken along lines 7--7 of
FIG. 6;
FIG. 8 is a schematic disclosure of a prior at system for introducing
secondary delivery;
FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram of an inventive system for introducing a
diluent via primary and secondary legs;
FIG. 9A is a cross-section of a pilot valve used in FIG. 9;
FIG. 9B is part of FIG. 9 with an automatic control for maintaining a ratio
of flows in primary and secondary legs of an electrolyte delivery system;
FIG. 10 is a front elevation of the inventive machine having secondary
dilution capabilities;
FIG. 10A shows an alternative wet polymer sensor for use in FIG. 10; and
FIG. 11 is a top plan view of the machine of FIG. 10.
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
In FIG. 1, the polymer inverting and activating system 18 components are an
input throttling valve 20 for controlling the ratio of water to polymer, a
centrifugal pump 22 for introducing the water, a closed mixing loop 24, a
pre-mixing manifold 26, and a centrifugal pump 28 for introducing the
polymer. The water and polymer first meet in the pre-mixing manifold 26,
the water flow being indicated in FIG. 1 by solid lines and the polymer
flow being indicated by dashed lines. Valve 20 may be set to provide a
ratio of water to about 1% polymer, in one example, with a useful ranger
of ratios being in the order of 0.25 to 15% polymer. Associated with valve
20 may be a meter (not shown) which is calibrated in gallons per minute.
By an adjustment of the valve 20, one can also select the desired output
of the system, or a more highly concentration of inverted polymer
solution.
The mixing pressure regulator 30 is critical in three areas. It is used to
maintain a constant net positive discharge head on the booster module or
centrifugal pump 22, which is an important consideration in the hydraulics
of the system. It controls the amount of recycling which occurs in the
recycle stage. It provides a variable pressure drop zone in the final
stage and enables the operator to select a proper amount of mixing energy,
based on the type and concentration of polymer being processed. The higher
solids polymers and higher solution concentrations require more mixing
energy than usual.
In greater detail, the mixing manifold 26 (FIG. 2) is, for example, a solid
block of metal having a central bore 32 extending through substantially
its entire length. The bore 32 stops short of a counterbored and threaded
input opening 34, to form a bulkhead 36. An orifice 38 of fixed diameter
is formed in the center of the bulkhead 36 to establish communication
between the water inlet hole 34 and the central bore 32, with a flow rate
that is controlled by the orifice diameter. The polymer solution
experiences an extrusion type of shear as it passes through the orifice
38.
TABLE I
______________________________________
AN EXEMPLARY FLOW RATE AND RECYCLE
VOLUME IN ONE EXEMPLARY SYSTEM
DIAMETER SOLUTION RECYCLE
TYPE OF OF OUTPUT VOLUME
PUMP ORIFICE 38 (GPM) GPM
______________________________________
054 AnCAT 3/32" to 3/16"
.25 to 10 gpm
1.85 @ 40 psi
to 8.12 @ 60
psi
L-10 AnCAT
1/8" to 1/4"
3 to 10 gpm 2.56 @ 30 psi
to 14.5 @ 60
psi
L-20 AnCAT
1/8" to 1/4"
3 to 20 gpm 2.56 @ 30 psi
to 14.5 @ 60
psi
L-30 AnCAT
1/8"to 3/8" 3 to 30 gpm 2.56 @ 30 psi
to 32.5 @ 60
psi
L-60 AnCAT
3/16" to 1/3"
5 to 60 gpm 5.75 @ 30 psi
to 57.8 @ 60
psi
L-80 AnCAT
3/16" to 5/8"
5 to 80 gpm 5.75 @ 30 psi
to 90.4 @ 60
psi
L-100 AnCAT
3/16" to 3/4"
5 to 100 gpm
5.75 @ 30 psi
to 130.0 @ 60
psi
______________________________________
The last or recycle column indicates that the recycled or returned output
from the derated pump 15 is in the order of about 5% to 70by volume. These
figures are derived from a Cameron Table, which a conventional tool for
hydraulic engineering. The converse statement would be that the outflow is
95% -30% by volume.
A first threaded hole 40 leads to another bulk head 42 between the entrance
to the counter bored and threaded hole 40 and the central bore 32. An
orifice 44 is formed in the bulkhead 42 to establish communication and to
control the flow rate between the hole 40 and the central bore 32.
The output port 46 is in direct communication with the central bore 32 to
give an unimpeded outflow of a mixture of polymer and water.
A static mixer 50 (FIGS. 3,4) comprises two sets of semi-elliptical baffles
which are set at an angle with respect to each other so that the over all
end view configuration is a circle (FIG. 4). The baffles 52 (FIG. 3A) on
one side of the static mixer are a series of spaced parallel plates. The
baffles 54 on the other side of the static mixer are Joined on alternate
ends to give an over all zig-zag appearance. The outside diameter of the
static mixer corresponds to the inside diameter of the central bore 32.
Therefore, the static mixer 50 slides through an end opening 56 and into
the bore 32. Thereafter a plug 58 seals off the end of the bore. In one
embodiment, the static mixer 50 is a standard commercial product from TAH
Industries of Inlaystown, N.J.
Water is introduced through the centrifugal pump 22 and into the mixing
loop 24 (FIG. 1). The flow of water is controlled and metered by the
throttling flow valve and meter at 20. The beginning stages of activation
or the pre-blend stage occurs inside the centrifugal pump assembly 22.
The centrifugal pump 22 is a modified commercial item which is derated on
the high end of its output flow by a factor in the order of 2 to 7, for
example, for most applications. On the low end of its output flow, the
derating factor may be much higher. That is the diameter (for example) of
the impeller is trimmed to give a derated performance wherein there is a
larger amount of stirring and mixing per volume flow, as compared to what
might normally be expected from standard commercial centrifugal pump.
Other techniques for derating an impeller including changing a pitch of
the blades, thinning the width of blades, and the like.
Derating is also controlled by an adjustment of the water inlet flow. In
greater detail, by way of example, a centrifugal pump usually has a series
of flow charts which are supplied by the manufacturer. One flow chart,
which may be the one normally used, may describe how the pump could
provide a flow of 20 gallons per minute to the top of a 40 foot head, for
example. Another flow chart may describe how the same pump could be
operated at a different speed to provide five times that capacity, or at
100 gallons per minute to the same 40 foot head, in this particular
example.
According to the invention, the pump is operated, for example, in the
manner described by the manufacturer to deliver 100 gallons per minute,
but the diameter of the impeller is reduced until the delivery returns to
20 gallons per minute, while the pump continues to be operated in the
manner which the manufacturer suggests for 100 gallons per minute. Thus,
in this particular example, the centrifugal pump has been derated by a
factor of 5 (i.e. derated from 100 to 20 gallons per minute). After
derating, the increased impeller speed, which is normally required to
deliver 100 gallons per minute imparts a higher level of energy to the
mixed fluid, without increasing the volume of fluid output.
The following chart illustrates a number of different centrifugal pumps
which may be used for polymer injection at pump 28.
______________________________________
TYPE PUMP FLOW RATE
______________________________________
054 AnCAT 0-864 gpd
L-10 AnCAT 0-2160 gpd
L-20 AnCAT 0-4320 gpd
L-30 AnCAT 0-6480 gpd
L-60 AnCAT 0-12,960 gpd
L-80 AnCAT 0-17,280 gpd
L-100 AnCAT 0-21,600 gpd
______________________________________
In pump type L-60, the impeller diameter was 5 inches; in pump type L-S0,
it was 6 inches, and in pump type L-100, it was 6.25 inches.
The unactivated or neat polymer is introduced through the premix manifold
26 and into the mixing loop 24 by a variable speed, positive displacement
pump 28 which delivers the polymer at a rate which achieves, a range of
desired concentrations. Because the centrifugal pump 22 is derated, it
causes a desirable mixing shear of the polymer. A calibration column (not
shown) is provided to correlate the variable speed pump 28 to its
capability to deliver the unactivated polymer at a rate which accurately
obtains the desired concentration. The pump 28 is not modified and merely
delivers the polymer to the mixing manifold 26.
The mixed water and polymer solution is recycled, via loop 24, back through
the premix manifold 26 and the booster module (derated centrifugal pump
22) which continues to boost the level of the activation or inversion of
the polymer.
The final stage of polymer inversion is controlled by the mixing pressure
regulator 30. The polymer solution passing through the regulator 30
experiences a sudden and abrupt pressure drop which further inverts the
solution. The pressure drop causes a third kind of shear of the polymer.
This pressure drop is adjustable and represents an important factor in the
development of the inversion of polymer molecules. The pressure regulator
30 is a standard commercial item.
More specifically, the mixing pressure regulator 30 is provided in the
mixing loop to enable a discharge of the inverted polymer at a desired
level of activation while, maintaining a net positive suction head in the
centrifugal pump to prevent cavitation. Once the desired output rate and
level of inversion is selected, the mixing pressure regulator 30
automatically compensates for any surging or ebbing flow which is
attendant upon changes in the output flow rate. Thus pressure regulator 30
maintains the desired level of inversion in the centrifugal pump 22.
It should now be apparent that the mixing pressure regulator is critical in
three areas. It is used to maintain a constant net positive discharge head
on the booster module, which is an important consideration in the
hydraulics of the system. It controls the amount of recycling which occurs
in the recycle stage. It provides a variable pressure drop zone in the
final stage and enables the operator to select a proper amount of mixing
energy, based on the type and concentration of polymer being processed.
The higher solids polymers and higher solution concentrations require more
mixing energy than usual.
Regulator 30 is set to cause a sudden and abrupt relaxation of pressure,
from the pressure in line 60 to or near atmospheric pressure. This sudden
and abrupt relaxation causes an effect which is somewhat similar to th | | |