|
|
|
| United States Patent | 5395438 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/5395438.html |
| Inventor(s) | Baig; Mirza A. (Des Plaines, IL);
Englert; Mark H. (Buffalo Grove, IL);
Gaynor; John C. (Antioch, IL);
Kacner; Michael A. (Lindenhurst, IL);
Singh; Rajinder (Mundelein, IL) |
| Abstract | A mineral wool-free acoustical tile composition and the acoustical tile
made therefrom wherein an expanded perlite is used as a substitute for
granulated mineral wool to provide porosity and good sound absorption
properties. It is preferred that the composition and acoustical tile also
contain an inorganic filler to provide texturability during the
manufacturing process. In addition, the acoustical tile composition also
contains a starch gel binder and a fiber reinforcing agent selected from
the group consisting of cellulosic fibers, polymeric fibers and glass
fibers. It has been found that the mineral wool-free acoustical tile
compositions of this invention have acoustical properties comparable to
the commercially available cast mineral wool tiles. In addition, the
mineral wool-free compositions can be used to cast an acoustical tile
using equipment and procedures currently used to produce cast mineral wool
tiles. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
March 7, 1995 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
January 14, 1994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 1769519
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 1996032
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 1996033
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 2772603
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 2884380
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3090699
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3228825
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3244632
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3246063
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3307651
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3367871
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3498404
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3510394
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3804706
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5277762 Felegi, Jr. 162/145 Jan,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5250153 Izard 162/152 Oct,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5106600 Johnstone 423/164 Apr,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5047120 Izard 162/101 Sep,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5022963 Porter 162/116 Jun,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5013405 Izard 162/101 May,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4968603 Slamon 435/6 Nov,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4941949 Luszczak 162/310 Jul,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4925529 Dotzauer 162/152 May,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4863979 Beyersdorf 524/14 Sep,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4861822 Keskey 524/559 Aug,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4801355 Johnstone 162/181.3 Jan,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4613627 Sherman 521/68 Sep,1986 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4587278 Dotzauer 523/200 May,1986 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4530653 Ishii 425/363 Jul,1985 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4126512 Hill 162/171 Nov,1978 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4062721 Guyer 162/101 Dec,1977 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5134179 Felegi, Jr. 524/13 Dec,1969 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
We claim:
1. A wetted, mineral wool-free pulp composition suitable for making
acoustical tiles comprising at least about 10% by weight on a dry solids
basis of expanded perlite, at least about 5% by weight on a dry solids
basis of a starch gel binder, at least about 35% by weight on a dry solids
basis of an inorganic mineral filler selected from the group consisting of
calcium sulfate dihydrate, calcium sulfate hemihydrate, silicates,
limestone and alumina, and from about 2% to about 10% by weight of a fiber
reinforcing agent selected from the group consisting of polymeric fibers
and glass fibers.
2. The composition of claim 1 which also contains a surfactant to increase
the rate of drying.
3. The composition of claim 1 in which the inorganic mineral filler is
selected from the group consisting of kaolin clay, ball clay, stucco,
gypsum and fibrous calcium sulfate hemihydrate.
4. The composition of claim 3 which contains up to about 5% by weight of an
acoustical enhancer selected from polystyrene beads and polyvinyl alcohol
foam.
5. The composition of claim 3 in which both the expanded perlite and the
inorganic mineral filler range from about 35% to about 50% by weight of
the composition on a dry solids basis.
6. The composition of claim 5 in which the inorganic mineral filler is
tabular acicular gypsum.
7. The composition of claim 6 in which the fiber reinforcing agent is
selected from the group consisting of wood and paper fibers.
8. The composition of claim 6 in which the fiber reinforcing agent is glass
fibers.
9. The composition of claim 8 which contains up to about 5% by weight of an
acoustical enhancer selected from polystyrene beads and polyvinyl alcohol
foam.
10. A dry mineral wool-free acoustical tile comprising at least about 10%
by weight of expanded perlite, at least about 5% by weight of a starch
binder, at least about 35% by weight of an inorganic mineral filler
selected from the group consisting of calcium Sulfate dihydrate, Calcium
Sulfate hemihydrate, silicates, limestone and alumina, and from about 2%
to about 10% by weight of a fiber reinforcing agent selected from the
group consisting of polymeric fibers and glass fibers.
11. The acoustical tile of claim 10 in which the inorganic mineral filler
is selected from the group consisting of kaolin clay, ball clay, stucco,
gypsum and fibrous calcium sulfate hemihydrate.
12. The acoustical tile of claim 11 which contains up to about 5% by weight
of an acoustical enhancer selected from polystyrene beads and polyvinyl
alcohol foam.
13. The acoustical tile of claim 11 in which both the expanded perlite and
the inorganic mineral filler range from about 35% to about 50% by weight
of the composition.
14. The acoustical tile of claim 13 in which the inorganic mineral filler
is tabular acicular gypsum.
15. The acoustical tile of claim 14 in which the fiber reinforcing agent is
selected from the group consisting of wood and paper fibers.
16. The acoustical tile of claim 14 in which the fiber reinforcing agent is
glass fibers.
17. The acoustical tile of claim 16 which contains up to about 5% by weight
of an acoustical enhancer selected from polystyrene beads and polyvinyl
alcohol foam.
18. A dry mineral wool-free acoustical tile comprising about 40% by weight
of expanded perlite, about 40% by weight of tabular acicular gypsum, about
15% by weight of a starch binder and about 5% by weight of a glass fiber
reinforcing agent. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to acoustical tile compositions useful in
manufacturing acoustical tiles and panels for ceiling applications. More
particularly, this invention relates to acoustical tile compositions which
do not contain mineral wool. The invention also relates to a novel
combination of expanded perlite, reinforcing fibers and an inorganic
filler in an acoustical tile composition.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A commercially successful acoustical tile is marketed under the trademark
ACOUSTONE and is made generally using the composition and procedures
disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 1,769,519. According to the teachings of this
patent, a molding composition comprising granulated mineral wool fibers,
fillers, colorants and a binder, in particular a starch gel, is prepared
for molding or casting the body of the tile. This mixture or composition
is placed upon suitable trays which have been covered with paper or a
metallic foil and then the composition is screeded to a desired thickness
with a screed bar or roller. A decorative surface, such as elongated
fissures, may be provided by the screed bar or roller. The trays filled
with the mineral wool pulp or composition are then placed in an oven for
twelve (12) hours or more to dry or cure the composition. The dried sheets
are removed from the trays and may be treated on one or both faces to
provide smooth surfaces, to obtain the desired thickness and to prevent
warping. The sheets are then cut into tiles of a desired size.
The mineral wool acoustical tiles of the prior art, as disclosed in U.S.
Pat. Nos. 3,246,063 and 3,307,651, generally used a starch gel as a binder
for the mineral wool fibers. The gel may comprise a thick boiling starch
composition combined with calcined gypsum (calcium sulfate hemihydrate)
which are added to water and cooked at 180.degree. F.-195.degree. F. for
several minutes to form the starch gel. Thereafter, the granulated mineral
wool is mixed into the starch gel to form the aqueous composition which is
used to fill the trays.
Mineral wool acoustical tiles are very porous which is necessary to provide
good sound absorption. The prior art (U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,498,404; 5,013,405
and 5,047,120) also discloses that mineral fillers, such as expanded
perlite, may be incorporated into the composition to improve sound
absorbing properties and provide light weight.
It is an object of this invention to provide an acoustical tile composition
which contains no mineral wool.
It is another object of this invention to provide a mineral wool-free
acoustical tile composition having acoustical properties comparable to the
commercially available cast mineral wool tiles.
It is a further object of this invention to provide an acoustical tile
composition comprising a combination of expanded perlite, a starch gel
binder, reinforcing fibers, and an inorganic filler.
These and other objects will be apparent to persons skilled in the art in
view of the description which follows.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It has been discovered that an expanded perlite can be combined with a
standard starch gel binder, an inorganic mineral filler for texturability
if desired, and a fiber reinforcing material (non-mineral wool), to
provide a dough-like composition (hereinafter referred to as a "pulp")
which can be used to cast an acoustical tile using equipment and
procedures currently used to produce cast mineral wool tiles. The mineral
wool-free pulp can be dried using less energy than employed in drying a
mineral wool pulp. The dried product can be formed into tiles having
comparable acoustical properties with commercially available acoustical
tiles. Acoustical tiles made from the mineral wool-free pulp of this
invention have acceptable physical properties for use in suspended ceiling
systems.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The mineral wool-free acoustical tile compositions of this invention are
based on using an expanded perlite as a substitute for granulated mineral
wool to provide porosity and good sound absorption properties preferably
combined with an inorganic filler to provide texturability. These two
ingredients when mixed with a starch gel binder, a fiber reinforcing
material and water, provide a mineral wool-free pulp which can be cast or
molded in trays using equipment and procedures currently used to produce
cast mineral wool tiles.
It has been found that a medium grade expanded perlite provides sufficient
porosity and acceptable texturability. The expanded perlite material is
commercially available from Silbrico Corporation under the designation
Perlite D-1. This medium grade expanded perlite contains perlite particles
that are similar in size to granulated mineral wool. A finer grade of
perlite (more than 60% by weight passed through a 100 mesh screen) was
evaluated, but the pulps made with the finer perlite had a lower texture
rating and the dried tiles showed more surface cracking. Other properties
such as warpage, hardness and modulus of elasticity were improved by the
finer grind. The finer grade perlite particles have greater surface area
and require more starch gel binder to obtain texture ratings comparable to
the medium grade expanded perlite. In addition, the finer grade perlite
increased the criticality of the fiber reinforcement relative to providing
an acceptable pulp texture. The range of expanded perlite in the pulp, on
a dry solids basis, may be from about 10% by weight to about 85% by
weight, with the preferred range being from about 25 to about 50 % by
weight.
The inorganic mineral filler provides texturability. Tabular acicular
gypsum is the preferred filler. Other materials, such as kaolin clay (in
natural hydrous form, or a calcined anhydrous form), Gardner ball clay,
stucco (calcium sulfate hemihydrate), gypsum (calcium sulfate dihydrate),
and fibrous calcium sulfate hemihydrate (FRANKLIN FIBER filler), have been
evaluated as fillers. The evaluations indicated that the presence of a
filler in the formulation causes a decrease in the final physical
properties of the acoustical tile. The filler appeared to contribute to
the formation of undesirable surface cracks, particularly in the absence
of a fiber reinforcement. The filler also adversely affected acoustical
properties. However, the filler has a marked effect upon the texturability
of the resultant pulp and is critical in providing a pulp which can be
processed on equipment which is currently used to make acoustical tile out
of mineral wool pulp. The tabular acicular gypsum filler provided a pulp
which had properties most similar to a standard mineral wool pulp. Other
fillers which might be used include limestone (calcium carbonate),
Feldspar, Nepheline, talc, mica, Wollastonite, synthetic silicates,
hydrous alumina, and silica.
The tabular acicular gypsum is made in accordance with the process
disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,801,355 and 5,106,600. The disclosure in
said U.S. Patents is incorporated herein by reference. It is generally
preferred that the inorganic mineral filler be present in the pulp, on a
dry solids basis, in amounts ranging from about 10% by weight to about 60%
by weight, with a range of about 35% to about 50% by weight being
particularly preferred.
When the inorganic mineral filler contains water of hydration, e.g. tabular
acicular gypsum, the filler may be calcined during the drying of the tile
which may be carried out at 350.degree. F. If the gypsum is calcined to a
hemihydrate or soluble anhydrite, the tile product may not be stable under
high humidity conditions and may sag excessively.
The first step in the preparation of an acoustical tile is the preparation
of the starch gel. In general, only the starch is dispersed in water, and
the slurry is heated until the starch is fully cooked and the slurry
thickens to a viscous gel. In the event a cellulosic fiber is used as a
reinforcing agent, it may be incorporated into the starch slurry prior to
cooking. The cooking temperature of the starch slurry should be closely
monitored to assure full swelling of the starch granules. A representative
cooking temperature for corn starch is about 180.degree. F. (82.degree.
C.)to about 195.degree. F.(90.degree. C.). The starch gel binder in the
pulp may range from about 5% to about 25% on a dry solids basis.
Several types of fiber reinforcing agents have been evaluated in the
mineral wool-free acoustical tile compositions of this invention. In
general, the fiber reinforcing agents may be selected from cellulosic
fibers, polymeric fibers and vitreous (glassy) fibers. Examples of
cellulosic fibers are softwood and hardwood fibers and paper fibers.
Polyester fibers have been used to prepare a pulp, but the dried product
was difficult to cut and to kerf. In addition, E-glass fibers have also
been used, but the preferred E-glass fibers require special handling
procedures. The fiber reinforcing agent is present in only minor amounts,
generally ranging from about 2% to about 10% by weight on a dry solids
basis. Other examples of polymeric fibers include rayons, polyolefins,
polyamides, nylons, acetates and aramid fibers.
The initial development efforts to produce a starch-based, cast acoustical
ceiling product without using mineral wool were directed to developing a
product requiring reduced drying energy. The following formulation was
developed to provide optimum texturability:
______________________________________
Ingredient Amount (grams)
% Solids
______________________________________
Expanded Perlite (medium grade)
500 42.4
Tabular Acicular Gypsum Filler
500 42.4
Starch Gel Binder 130 11
Cellulosic Fiber 50 4.2
Water 2,500 0
______________________________________
The procedure used in preparing the starch-based acoustical tile was very
similar to the manufacturing methods used to prepare a standard cast
mineral wool tile. The reason for the similarity was the intention to use
existing equipment to make the mineral wool-free acoustical tile. It was
the basic cast process wherein a starch gel binder was mixed with an
expanded perlite and an inorganic filler (preferably tabular acicular
gypsum) to produce a dough-like pulp.
The starch gel binder was prepared as set forth above. When cellulosic
fibers were used for reinforcement, they were incorporated into the starch
gel prior to cooking. Mixing the cooked starch gel with the expanded
perlite and the inorganic filler is the final step in preparing the pulp.
In the laboratory, the mixing step was carried out in a Hobart (Model
A-200) mixer. A mix time of 1 minute at speed No. 1 was determined to be
suitable to attain complete mixing of all of the ingredients without
breaking down the starch gel and the fragile perlite particles.
Physical testing of laboratory boards was conducted according to
established procedures. In most instances, three 10 inch.times.3 inch
samples were cut from each 12 inch.times.12 inch or 12 inch.times.24 inch
board and tested in a flexural mode using an Instron Model 1130 test
instrument. Data normally measured included density (lb./ft..sup.3), the
modulus of rupture (MOR) in psi, the modulus of elasticity (in psi) and
the hardness (in lbs. using the 2 inch Janka ball hardness method).
EXAMPLE 1
A series of inorganic fillers were evaluated to determine which filler
provided the best texturability. The following fillers were tested:
Gardner Ball Clay; Kaolin Clay; Stucco (calcium sulfate hemihydrate);
Tabular Acicular Gypsum; and Fibrous Calcium Sulfate Hemihydrate (Franklin
Fiber Brand). The formulation used to carry out the evaluation was as
follows:
______________________________________
Total
Ingredient Amount (grams)
% Solids
______________________________________
Expanded Perlite (Slibrico D-1)
600 78.4
Starch Gel 100 15.7
Paper Fiber 37.5 5.9
Filler Variable 0-300
--
Water 2,000 0
______________________________________
TABLE 1
______________________________________
Filler Type Filler % Density (lb./ft..sup.3
MOR(psi)
______________________________________
Ball Clay 13.6 14.1 174
Ball Clay 23.9 14.3 148
Ball Clay 32.0 16.1 215
Kaolin Clay 13.6 13.7 151
Kaolin Clay 23.9 14.8 166
Kaolin Clay 38.6 19.1 170
Stucco 13.6 13.7 117
Stucco 23.9 16.0 110
Stucco 32.0 17.1 115
Acicular Gypsum
13.6 14.1 150
Acicular Gypsum
23.9 15.2 146
Acicular Gypsum
32.0 16.6 133
Franklin Fiber
5.2 12.7 130
Franklin Fiber
9.9 13.7 115
______________________________________
The tabular acicular gypsum provided pulp properties most similar to those
of granulated mineral wool and the best texturability.
EXAMPLE 2
A variety of cellulosic fiber types were evaluated in a mineral wool-free
pulp. The following cellulosic fibers were used in the pulp formulations
which did not contain an inorganic filler:
1) a medium wood fiber type
2) a coarse wood fiber type
3) pulped fly leaf--a highly refined bleached fiber obtained by
hydropulping waste office paper
4) bleached softwood kraft--a long fibered, bleached, softwood kraft fiber
The following formulation was used:
______________________________________
Ingredient Total Amount (grams)
% Solids
______________________________________
Expanded Perlite (D-1)
500 83.3
Starch Gel 100 16.7
Cellulosic Fiber
Variable 0-66.67
--
Filler 0 --
Water 2,000 0
______________________________________
The acoustical tiles made from this pulp formulation using the various
cellulosic fibers were evaluated and yielded the following results:
______________________________________
% Density MOR MOE
Fiber Type Fiber (lb./ft..sup.3)
(psi) (psi)
______________________________________
Medium Wood Fiber
2.0 11.4 82.5 14,400
Medium Wood Fiber
4.0 11.8 107 13,800
Medium Wood Fiber
6.0 12.1 120 15,900
Medium Wood Fiber
7.6 12.2 133 16,800
Medium Wood Fiber
10 12.4 152 17,500
Coarse Wood | | |