|
|  Get related patents on CD |
| United States Patent | 5401511 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/5401511.html |
| Inventor(s) | Margalit; Rimona (Givataim, IL) |
| Abstract | Methodologies have been developed and certain recognizing substances and
crosslinking reagents have been identified to modify liposomes.
Crosslinking reagents link residues on the liposomal surface to the
residues offered by certain recognizing substances. The crosslinking
reagents include glutaraldehyde (GAD) and a water soluble carbodiimide,
preferably, 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC). The
recognizing substances include gelatin, collagen, and hyaluronic acid
(HA). Following these methodologies, recognizing substances can be
utilized as an adhesive or glue to attach the liposomes onto a target
area. These "bioadhesive" liposomes offer potential advantages as a
microscopic drug delivery system. |
| |
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
March 28, 1995 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
October 9, 1992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parent Case |
This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 07/655,878, filed on
Feb. 14, 1991, now abandoned. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the preparation of microscopic drug
delivery systems (MDDS) utilizing drug-encapsulating bioadhesive
liposomes.
Microscopic drug delivery systems (MDDS) have been developed for improved
drug administration relative to administration of drugs in their free
form. Drug-loaded MDDS can perform as sustained or controlled release drug
depots. By providing a mutual protection of the drug and the biological
environment, MDDS reduces drug degradation or inactivation. As a system
for controlled release of a drug, MDDS improves drug efficacy and allows
reduction in the frequency of dosing. Since the pharmacokinetics of free
drug release from depots of MDDS are different than from
directly-administered drug, MDDS provides an additional measure to reduce
toxicity and undesirable side effects.
MDDS is divided into two basic classes: particulate systems, such as cells,
microspheres, viral envelopes and liposomes; or nonparticulate systems
which are macromolecules such as proteins or synthetic polymers. Liposomes
have been studied as drug carriers and offer a range of advantages
relative to other MDDS systems. Composed of naturally-occurring materials
which are biocompatible and biodegradable, liposomes are used to
encapsulate biologically active materials for a variety of purposes.
Having a variety of layers, sizes, surface charges and compositions,
numerous procedures for liposomal preparation and for drug encapsulation
within them have been developed, some of which have been scaled up to
industrial levels. Liposomes can be designed to act as sustained release
drug depots and, in certain applications, aid drug access across cell
membranes. Their ability to protect encapsulated drugs and various other
characteristics make liposomes a popular choice in developing MDDS, with
respect to the previous practices of free drug administration.
Despite the advantages offered, utilization of drug-encapsulating liposomes
does pose some difficulties. For example, liposomes as MDDS have limited
targeting abilities, limited retention and stability in circulation,
potential toxicity upon chronic administration and inability to
extravasate. In recent years, successful attempts have been made to bind
different substances to liposomes. For example, binding of chymotrypsin to
liposomes has been studied as a model for binding substances to liposomal
surfaces. Recognizing substances, including antibodies, glycoproteins and
lectins, have been bound to liposomal surfaces in an attempt to confer
target specificity to the liposomes. Concentrating on systemic application
and in vivo studies, these previous efforts have discussed methods of
binding recognizing substances with liposomes and studied the
effectiveness of such modified liposomes. Although the bonding of these
recognizing substances to liposomes occurred, the resulting modified
liposomes did not performed as hoped, particularly during in vivo studies.
Other difficulties are presented when utilizing these recognizing
substances. For example, antibodies can be patient specific and therefore,
add cost to the drug therapy.
The number and surface density of the discrete sites on the liposomal
surfaces for covalent bonding are dictated by the liposome formulation and
the liposome type. The liposomal surfaces also have sites for noncovalent
association. Covalent binding is essential as noncovalent binding might
result in dissociation of the recognizing substances from the liposomes at
the site of administration since the liposomes and the bioadhesive
counterparts of the target site (that is, the bioadhesive matter) compete
for the recognizing substances. Such dissociation would reverse the
administered modified liposomes into regular, non-modified liposomes,
thereby defeating the purpose of administration of the modified liposomes.
To form covalent conjugates of recognizing substances and liposomes,
crosslinking reagents have been studied for effectiveness and
biocompatibility. Once such reagent is glutaraldehyde (GAD). Through the
complex chemistry of crosslinking by GAD, linkage of the amine residues of
the recognizing substances and liposomes is established. For example,
previous efforts have studied binding of chymotrypsin and liposomes with
GAD as the crosslinking reagent. Further, covalently binding a growth
factor as a recognizing substance to liposomes has been disclosed in my
concurrently filed application.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
According to the present invention, methodologies have been developed and
recognizing substances and crosslinking reagents have been identified to
modify liposomes for MDDS. More specifically, crosslinking reagents have
been identified which crosslink residues on tile liposomal surface to the
residues offered by certain recognizing substances. The crosslinking
reagents include glutaraldehyde (GAD) and a water soluble carbodiimide,
preferably, 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC). The
recognizing substances include gelatin, collagen, and hyaluronic acid
(HA). Following these methodologies, recognizing substances can be
utilized as an adhesive or glue to attach the liposomes onto a target
area. These "bioadhesive" liposomes offer potential advantages as a MDDS
for the administration of drugs which is further disclosed in my
concurrently filed applications.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
According to the present invention, various recognizing substances have
been covalently bound to liposomal surfaces through the chemistry of
crosslinking functional groups offered by the recognizing substances and
the liposomes. Liposomes, in particular, multilamellar vesicles (MLV),
microemulsified liposomes (MEL) or large unilamellar vesicles (LUVET),
each containing phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), have been prepared by
established procedures. The inclusion of PE in the liposome formulations
provides an active functional residue, a primary amine, on the liposomal
surface for crosslinking purposes.
Recognizing substances have been successfully linked with PE-liposomes.
Using commercially available gelatin and collagen, these
protein-recognizing substances were linked to the liposomes through amine
residues. HA is a natural polymer with alternating units of N-acetyl
glucoseamine and glucoronic acid. Using a crosslinking reagent, HA offers
carboxylic acid residues as functional groups for covalent binding. The
N-acetyl-glucoseamine contains hydroxyl units of the type --CH.sub.2 --OH
which can be oxidized to aldehydes, thereby offering an additional method
of crosslinking HA to the liposomal surface in the absence of a
crosslinking reagent.
The "level of covalent binding" as reported in the Examples and Tables 1-4,
is defined as the quantity of recognizing substance bound to a given
quantity of lipid in the final product since the most accurate
quantitative measure of liposomes is in terms of lipid quantities. The
recognizing substances and lipids are assayed by traces of labels included
in each formulation. Alternatively, the lipids are assayed by colorimetric
methods. The determination of the protein-recognizing substances can be
done by the Lowry procedure previously reported. Free HA and liposome
bound HA is determined by the Alcian Blue method.
For a given lipid quantity, different liposome types will yield different
quantities of liposomes. Therefore, similar initial ratios of recognizing
substance to lipid for different liposome types should not be expected to
yield the same level of binding. Another factor which would yield
different results for different liposomes even under the same initial
recognizing substance to lipid ratios, is the differences in particle
size, therefore in curvature, number and accessibility or PE sites on the
surface of the liposome. Therefore, comparisons among liposome types
should be avoided.
EXAMPLE ONE
Gelatin is added to a PE-liposome sample and the mixture is buffered by a
phosphate buffer saline solution (PBS) to pH of 7.2. Concentration ratios
of gelatin to lipid are shown in Table 1. Aliquots from a 25% solution of
the crosslinking reagent GAD are added at a ratio of 10 .mu.l per 1 ml
gelatin/PE-liposome mixture. Incubation for a desired period is completed
at either room temperature without stirring or at 37.degree. C. with
stirring. Depending upon the liposome used, excess unreacted material was
removed through either centrifugation and washings, column chromatography
or dialysis against PBS.
TABLE 1
______________________________________
GELATIN-LIPOSOME CROSSLINKING BY GAD
Liposome ug Gelatin/uMole Lipid
Incubation
Type Initial Final Period (a)
______________________________________
MEL 21 0.02 Short
MEL 63 0.24 Short
MEL 127 0.26 Short
MEL 21 15 Long
MEL 23 14 Long
MEL 25 18 Long
MEL 63 43 Long
MEL 187 208 Long
MLV 18 0.24 Long
MLV 66 0.67 Long
MLV 281 2.6 Long
MLV 556 6.4 Long
MLV 1140 13 Long
MLV 2350 13 Long
MLV 3440 24 Long
MLV 5830 26 Long
______________________________________
(a) Incubation Periods: "Short" is 5 minutes; "Long" is 24-48 hours.
EXAMPLE TWO
Collagen is crosslinked to PE-MLV samples with GAD following the same
procedure as in Example 1, at "Long" incubation periods.
TABLE 2
______________________________________
COLLAGEN-LIPOSOME CROSSLINKING BY GAD
Liposome ug Collagen/uMole Lipid
Type Initial Final
______________________________________
MLV 1.64 0.90
MLV 2.06 1.18
MLV 5.01 2.20
MLV 8.96 5.07
MLV 9.83 6.78
MLV 9.86 6.02
MLV 10.68 8.20
MLV 18.79 11.55
MLV 20.00 14.14
______________________________________
EXAMPLE THREE
Aqueous solutions of HA and of EDC were mixed to yield a preparation system
of HA and EDC each at final concentrations of 1.7 mg/ml. The pH of the
preparation system was adjusted to 3 by titration with 1N HCl. The
preparation system was incubated for a time period at 37.degree. C. with
stirring. Table 3 shows an example of variation in the pre-incubation time
period for reacting HA with EDC. A pre-incubation period of 3 hours is
preferred to activate the carboxylic residues of HA.
TABLE 3
______________________________________
EFFECTS OF PRE-INCUBATION
HA-LIPOSOME BINDING(a)
PRE-INCUBATION mg HA
PERIOD (hours) Bound/mmole Lipid
______________________________________
0 0
1 0
3 22.8 .+-. 0.9
24 20.9 .+-. 2.8
______________________________________
(a) Liposomes are LUVET, incubation was at 37.degree. C., incubation of
complete reaction mixture at pH 3 with the addition of borate buffer for
24 hours.
After the pre-incubation period, PE-liposome samples were added and
followed by the addition of a 0.1M borate buffer at pH 8.5. The
HA/PE-liposome mixture was incubated at 37.degree. C. in a shaker bath for
24 hours. Removal of excess unbound HA and reagents was by
ultracentrifugation and washings. Initial and final concentrations of
HA/lipid are reported in Table 5.
EXAMPLE FOUR
Various parameters affect the successful binding of HA to PE-liposomes when
using EDC as the crosslinking reagent. These parameters include a
pre-incubation procedure, pH of the reaction mixture, use of buffer
solution in the incubation system and the contact area between liposomes
and HA. Tables 4 and 5 provide data on variations of these parameters.
TABLE 4
______________________________________
EFFECTS OF pH, BUFFER, PRE-INCUBATION
AND CONTACT AREA ON COVALENT BONDING
OF HA AND LIPOSOMES.sup.(a)
Borate HA-Liposome
mg HA Bound/
pH Buffer Contact Area
mmole Lipid
______________________________________
4.5.sup.(b)
-- Narrow 3.1 .+-. 0.6
4.5 -- Narrow 5.2 .+-. 0.5
4.5 -- Wide 7.6 .+-. 3.9
4.5 Added Wide 19.0 .+-. 0.9
3.0 Added Wide 26.5 .+-. 0.9
______________________________________
.sup.(a) Using MLV and EDC, three hours of preincubation (see exception
below), 24 hours incubation of complete reaction mixture, both at
37.degree. C.
.sup.(b) No preincubation, pH listed is for the incubation of the complet
reaction mixture.
EXAMPLE FIVE
A reaction mixture of HA, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and acetic anhydride
were stirred at room temperature for 24 hours. At the end of this period,
the mixture was transferred to a dialysis sac and dialyzed against water
over 48 hours. Activated HA was completely recovered from the sac as
determined by the Alcian Blue method. Activated HA was incubated with
PE-liposomes in 0.5M carbonate buffer at a pH of 9 for 24 hours in a
shaker bath at 37.degree. C. Adding sodium borohydride as a reducing
agent, portions of the activated HA/PE-liposome mixture were incubated for
an additional two hours. Removal of excess unbound HA and reagents was by
centrifugation and washings. Concentration ratios of activated-HA to lipid
are shown in Table 5.
TABLE 5
______________________________________
COVALENT BINDING OF HA TO LIPOSOMES
CROSSLINKER-HA & ACTIVATED-HA (a)
mg HA/mmoles Lipid
Methodology Initial Final pH
______________________________________
With EDC 1000 27 3
Activated HA 974 86 9
with Reduction
Activated HA 974 113 9
without Reduction
______________________________________
(a) Liposomes were MLV
The covalent bonding of the recognizing substances, gelatin, collagen and
HA, to liposomal surfaces can be achieved. Noncovalently bound product is
removed as excess unreacted material and does not appear in the reported
results. Preferably, protein-recognizing substances such as gelatin and
collagen, are covalently bonded to PE-liposomes through amine residues
with the crosslinking reagent GAD.
The bonding of HA to PE-liposomes can be completed either in the presence
or absence of a crosslinking reagent. In the presence of a reagent,
preferably EDC, a pH of 3 in the pre-incubation system is preferred. A
3-hour approximate time period is preferred for pre-incubation of the HA
and crosslinking reagent. The addition of a 0.1M borate buffer at pH of
8.5 to the incubation system offers a positive contribution to the binding
step. Changing the reaction mixture vessel in the binding step from test
tubes to flasks, thereby increasing the area of contact between liposomes
and HA did not adversely effect the binding results.
Bonding of HA to PE-liposomes without a crosslinking reagent is preferably
completed by pre-activation of HA and an incubation period of 24 hours at
a reaction mixture pH of 9.
While the preferred embodiments have been described, various modifications
and substitutes may be made without departing from the scope of the
invention. For example, the pre-activation of the carboxylic residues of
HA could be completed with dicyclohexylcarbodiimide or with
N,N'-disuccinimidyl carbonate. Accordingly, it is to be understood that
the invention has been described by way of illustration and not
limitation.
* * * * *
|
|
|
|
|
Description  |
|