|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed is:
1. A method for extending an unambiguous range of interferometric
measurement of an object illuminated by a source having a first color
wavelength .lambda., a second color wavelength .lambda..sub.2 and a
synthetic wavelength
.LAMBDA.=(.lambda..multidot..lambda..sub.2)/(.lambda..sub.2 -.lambda.), to
an unambiguous range greater than the synthetic wavelength .LAMBDA.,
comprising the steps of:
(a) determining an instantaneous interferometric optical phase .phi. of the
first source color, an instantaneous interferometric optical phase .phi.hd
2 of the second source color, and a synthetic phase .PHI. defined by
.phi.-.phi..sub.2 ; and
(b) calculating the object measurement by analysis of a phase couple formed
by a combination of said synthetic phase .PHI. and said first source color
optical phase .phi..
2. A method for extending an unambiguous range of interferometric
measurement of an object illuminated by a source having a first color
wavelength .lambda., a second color wavelength .lambda..sub.2 and a
synthetic wavelength
.LAMBDA.=(.lambda..multidot..lambda..sub.2)/(.lambda..sub.2 -.lambda.), to
an unambiguous range greater than the synthetic wavelength .LAMBDA.,
comprising the steps of:
(a) calculating an unambiguous range multiplier integer N.sub.R consistent
with the first color wavelength .lambda. and second color wavelength
.lambda..sub.2 for providing an unambiguous measurement range N.sub.R
.LAMBDA., wherein N.sub.R >1;
(b) determining an instantaneous interferometric optical phase .phi. of the
first source color, an instantaneous interferometric optical phase
.phi..sub.2 of the second source color, and a synthetic phase .PHI.
defined by .phi.-.phi..sub.2 ;
(c) estimating a synthetic fringe order N'.ltoreq.N.sub.R using the first
source color optical phase .phi. and the synthetic phase .PHI. which
together define a phase couple (.PHI.,.phi.) that repeats at intervals of
N.sub.R .LAMBDA.; and
(d) calculating the object measurement using the first source color optical
phase .phi., the first source color wavelength .lambda., the synthetic
phase .PHI., and the synthetic fringe order N' estimated in said step (c).
3. The method of claim 2, wherein said step (c) comprises:
(i) obtaining an initial estimate n' of an optical fringe order n for the
first color source wavelength .lambda. in accordance with:
##EQU12##
(ii) obtaining an estimate N' of the synthetic fringe order in accordance
with:
##EQU13##
4. The method of claim 2, wherein said step (d) comprises:
(i) determining a corrected optical fringe order n" for the first color
source wavelength .lambda. using the synthetic fringe order N' determined
in said step (c); and
(ii) calculating the object measurement using the optical fringe order n"
determined in said step (i).
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the object measurement is a distance L
and said step (ii) comprises the steps of:
(A) obtaining a corrected estimate n" of the optical fringe order n in
accordance with:
##EQU14##
(B) calculating the distance L by the steps of: (1) calculating an
intermediate distance value L" in accordance with:
##EQU15##
(2) calculating the distance L in accordance with:
##EQU16##
6. The method of claim 5, wherein said step (a) comprises the steps of:
(I) selecting an unambiguous range that is an integral multiple N.sub.R of
the synthetic wavelength .LAMBDA.;
(II) choosing an integer n.sub.R such that a first ratio n.sub.R /N.sub.R
is approximately equal to a second ratio .LAMBDA./.lambda.; and
(III) adjusting at least one of the first and second color wavelengths
.lambda., .lambda..sub.2 to more closely approximate equality of the first
ratio n.sub.R /N.sub.R and the second ratio .LAMBDA./.lambda..
7. The method of claim 6, wherein said step (II) further comprises
confirming that said first ratio n.sub.R /N.sub.R cannot be represented by
an equal value ratio x/y having integers y and x that are smaller than
said respective integers N.sub.R and n.sub.R.
8. A method for extending an unambiguous range of interferometric
measurement of an object illuminated by a source having a first color
wavelength .lambda., a second color wavelength .lambda..sub.2 and a
synthetic wavelength
.LAMBDA.=(.lambda..multidot..lambda..sub.2)/(.lambda..sub.2 -.lambda.), to
an unambiguous range greater than the synthetic wavelength .LAMBDA.,
comprising the steps of:
(a) determining an instantaneous interferometric optical phase .phi. of the
first source color, an instantaneous interferometric optical phase
.phi..sub.2 of the second source color, and a synthetic phase .PHI.
defined by .phi.-.phi..sub.2 ;
(b) calculating an unambiguous range multiplier integer N.sub.R for
providing an unambiguous measurement range N.sub.R .multidot..LAMBDA.,
wherein N.sub.R >1;
(c) determining a synthetic fringe order N using the phase .phi. of the
first source color and the synthetic phase .PHI. which together define a
phase couple (.PHI.,.phi.) that repeats at intervals for which n.sub.R
/N.sub.R =.LAMBDA./.lambda.;
(d) determining an optical fringe order n for the source wavelength
.lambda. using the synthetic fringe order N determined in said step (c);
and
(e) calculating the object measurement using the optical fringe order n
determined in said step (d).
9. The method of claim 8, wherein said step (c) comprises:
(i) obtaining an initial estimate n' of the optical fringe order n in
accordance with:
##EQU17##
(ii) obtaining an estimate N' of the synthetic fringe order N in
accordance with:
##EQU18##
10. The method of claim 9, wherein said step (d) comprises obtaining a
corrected estimate n" of the optical fringe order n in accordance with:
##EQU19##
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the object measurement is a distance L
and said step (e) comprises calculating the distance L by the steps of:
(1) calculating an intermediate distance value L" in accordance with:
##EQU20##
(2) calculating the distance L in accordance with:
##EQU21##
12. The method of claim 11, wherein said step (b) comprises the steps of:
(i) selecting an unambiguous range that is an integral multiple N.sub.R of
the synthetic wavelength .LAMBDA.;
(ii) choosing an integer n.sub.R such that a first ratio n.sub.R /N.sub.R
is approximately equal to a second ratio .LAMBDA./.lambda.; and
(iii) adjusting at least one of the first and second color wavelengths
.lambda., .lambda..sub.2 to more closely approximate equality of the first
ratio n.sub.R /N.sub.R and the second ratio .LAMBDA./.lambda..
13. The method of claim 12, wherein said step (ii) further comprises
confirming that said first ratio n.sub.R /N.sub.R cannot be represented by
an equal value ratio x/y having integers y and x that are smaller than
said respective integers N.sub.R and n.sub.R.
14. The method of claim 8, wherein said step (b) comprises the steps of:
(i) selecting an unambiguous range that is an integral multiple N.sub.R of
the synthetic wavelength .LAMBDA.;
(ii) choosing an integer n.sub.R such that a first ratio n.sub.R /N.sub.R
is approximately equal to a second ratio .LAMBDA./.lambda.; and
(iii) adjusting at least one of the first and second color wavelengths
.lambda., .lambda..sub.2 to more closely approximate equality of the first
ratio n.sub.R /N.sub.R and the second ratio .LAMBDA./.lambda..
15. The method of claim 14, wherein said step (ii) further comprises
confirming that said first ratio n.sub.R /N.sub.R cannot be represented by
an equal value ratio x/y having integers y and x that are smaller than
said respective integers N.sub.R and n.sub.R. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to precision optical metrology
instrumentation for distance measurement and, more particularly, to
increasing the unambiguous measurement range of two-color interferometers.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A well-known problem in metrology involves the interferometric measurement
of distances and of changes in distance for surfaces that may have
discontinuities larger than the source wavelength. Calculation of a
round-trip optical path difference L in interferometers is carried out on
the basis of the measured phase -.pi.<.phi.<.pi. and the optical
wavelength .lambda.:
##EQU1##
Since the phase is determined from an inverse trigonometric function, the
same measured value of .phi. will be repeated at path-length intervals
R.sub.n equal to
R.sub.n =n.lambda. (Equation 2)
where n is an integer that cannot be determined from the phase measurement
alone. In the absence of some other information relating to the optical
path length, the interferometer can only make unambiguous single-point
measurements over a range limited to the optical wavelength.
To increase the unambiguous range, a second wavelength .lambda..sub.2 with
an associated phase .phi..sub.2 and integer fringe order n.sub.2 may be
introduced. Multiple-color interferometry has been used for over a century
to facilitate the identification of fringe orders. Traditionally, the
analysis proceeds by some variation of the method of excess fractions,
also known as the method of exact fractions which, according to the text
Principles of Optics by M. Born and E. Wolf (Pergamon Press, 1987), was
first used in four-color interferometry by J. R. Benoit in 1898. The
method of excess fractions consists of determining mutually consistent
values for the integer fringe orders n and n.sub.2, given the measured
fractional fringe orders .phi./2.pi. and .phi..sub.2 /2.pi.. In its
simplest form, the computational procedure for this method can be reduced
to calculating a large number of possible distances for the given
fractional fringe orders, and then observing which values are in closest
agreement.
It has become common practice in the art to make the data processing in
two-color interferometry more rapid and intuitive by defining a synthetic
wavelength .LAMBDA., defined by the spatial beat period for a two-color
interference pattern. The corresponding synthetic phase is
##EQU2##
constrained by -.pi.<.PHI..ltoreq..pi.. Using this concept and assuming a
perfectly compensated interferometer, a distance L' can be obtained from
the relationship
##EQU3##
where N is the integer synthetic fringe order and the synthetic wavelength
.LAMBDA. is defined by
##EQU4##
If N=0, then an estimate n' of the optical wavelength fringe order can be
made by substituting Eq. (4) into Eq. (1) and rearranging to obtain
##EQU5##
The final distance measurement is then
##EQU6##
where the function Int{} returns the nearest integer to its argument. The
unambiguous measurement range has thus now been extended to the synthetic
wavelength .LAMBDA., which may be very much larger than .lambda..
The use of synthetic wavelengths has been widely accepted in many different
forms of interferometry. In the two-wavelength holographic method
described by K. Haines and B. P. Hildebrand in Contour Generation By
Wavefront Reconstruction, 19 Physics Letters 10-11 (1965), the synthetic
wavelength corresponds to the contour intervals of constructive
interference in the reconstructed holographic image. Similar techniques
involving synthetic wavelengths have been described by J. C. Wyant in
Testing Aspherics Using Two-Wavelength Holography, 10 Applied Optics
2113-18 (1971). A computational approach to the method of exact fractions
based on synthetic wavelengths is described in an article by C. R. Tilford
entitled Analytical Procedure For Determining Lengths From Fractional
Fringes, 16 Applied Optics 1857-60 (1977). U.S. Pat. No. 4,355,899 of T.
A. Nussmeier, entitled Interferometric Distance Measurement Method,
discloses the general concept of using synthetic wavelength information to
remove the phase ambiguities in interferometry. This principle has been
applied to full-aperture phase-modulation interferometry by Y. Cheng and
J. C. Wyant, as described in Two-Wavelength Phase Shying Interferometry,
23 Applied Optics 4539-43 (1984). Virtually all modern embodiments of
multiple color interferometers employ an analysis based on synthetic
wavelengths as is manifest, for example, from the review article Absolute
Distance Interferometry by N. A. Massie and H. John Caulfield, 816
Proceedings of the Society of Photooptical Engineers 149-57 (1987).
The only limitation of the synthetic-wavelength method, apart from
practical difficulties in construction of appropriate instrumentation, is
that the same synthetic phase .PHI. will repeat itself at distances
R.sub.n =N.LAMBDA.. (Equation 8)
Thus, the unambiguous range interval for this method is defined by
.vertline.L.vertline.<.LAMBDA./2. It is generally accepted in the art that
the only way in which to extend this range is to either increase the
synthetic wavelength .LAMBDA. or incorporate additional optical,
electrical or mechanical means for removing the synthetic-wavelength phase
ambiguity. This limitation, which is evident in the aforementioned
articles and widely known to those skilled in the art, restricts the
choice of source and detection methods available for the implementation of
two-color interferometry. For example the two-color source, which may be
formed by two different kinds of inexpensive lasers, light-emitting diodes
or interference filters, can become more costly or difficult to implement
if a significantly different wavelength separation is required in order to
increase the synthetic wavelength. In addition, some interferometers use
prisms, gratings or interference filters to separate the two colors before
detection, and this separation is rendered more difficult when the two
colors are selected as very close in wavelength to one another in order to
generate a large synthetic wavelength. These problems apply to all
interferometers employing two colors for the purpose of measuring
distances unambiguously over ranges larger than an optical wavelength.
OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION
Accordingly, it is a principal object of the present invention to measure
distances interferometrically, without phase ambiguity, over ranges
exceeding the synthetic wavelength of the two-color source illumination of
the interferometer.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a systematic approach to
selecting appropriate optical wavelengths for the two source colors so as
to achieve an extension of the unambiguous measurement range by a chosen
multiple of the synthetic wavelength.
It is another object of the invention to provide an efficient and accurate
interferometric computational method and apparatus for performing distance
measurements over ranges exceeding the synthetic wavelength of the
two-color source illumination of the interferometer.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with a method of the invention, and apparatus for
accomplishing the same, a first step consists of illuminating a Michelson
or equivalent amplitude-division interferometer with a two-color source.
One leg of the instrument includes a target surface whose position L is to
be determined. In a second step the achievable unambiguous range for the
two-color source is calculated and expressed as a multiple N.sub.r of the
wavelength .LAMBDA.. The value of this multiplying factor N.sub.R is a
characteristic of the two-color source and, if a particular multiplying
factor is desired, the source can be selected or adjusted according to a
procedure taught hereinbelow in the Detailed Description of the Preferred
Embodiments. Phase-modulation interferometry or like phase-detection means
is used to calculate the interferometric phases .phi. and .phi..sub.2
corresponding to each of the two source colors in a third step. In a next
step, a synthetic phase .PHI. is calculated, and is constrained to a range
of .+-..pi.. In a further step, a synthetic fringe order N, generally
considered to be unknown in prior art methods of two-color interferometry,
is determined by analysis of the phase couple (.PHI..phi.). The phase
couple (.PHI..phi.), composed of the combination of the synthetic phase
.PHI. and the optical phase .phi., repeats at intervals which may be very
much larger than the synthetic wavelength .LAMBDA.. The unambiguous
distance measurement range can therefore be extended using knowledge of
the spatial evolution of this phase couple for the particular source
colors employed. In a final step, the synthetic wavelength is utilized to
determine the integer fringe order n for the optical wavelength, thus
resulting in a distance measurement L having interferometric accuracy.
Since the method of the invention includes an express determination of the
synthetic fringe order N, the useful unambiguous range N.sub.R .LAMBDA. of
the instrument can be larger than the synthetic wavelength.
The ability to unambiguously measure beyond the synthetic wavelength
greatly increases the functionality of interferometric measuring
tools--making it possible, even in applications requiring a comparatively
large unambiguous range, to use sources whose composite colors are widely
spaced in wavelength. Thus, a two-color source for the present invention
may be formed by two different kinds of inexpensive quasi-monochromatic
devices, which may be relatively inexpensive and easy to obtain with a
wide wavelength separation, or by a single gas laser emitting light
efficiently in widely-separated spectral regions corresponding to
different transitions in the gain medium, or by some combination of
sources that would otherwise be impractical by virtue of a small synthetic
wavelength. Moreover, detection of source colors using prisms, gratings,
dichromatic prisms, and the like is greatly facilitated by a large
spectral separation. Still another advantage lies in the ability to use a
single multiple-order optical filter to control the transmitted source
wavelengths and improve the temporal coherence of a source formed by two
broadband devices, such as light-emitting diodes, whose large spectral
bandwidths would otherwise overlap were the diode colors too close in
wavelength. These advantages are readily adapted to other instruments
based on interference phenomena, including imaging systems capable of
simultaneously acquiring phase information for a plurality of points
arranged in a two-dimensional array, as is the case with various
well-known apparatus for testing optical components, analyzing wavefronts,
or topographical mapping of microscopic surfaces.
Other objects and features of the present invention will become apparent
from the following detailed description considered in conjunction with the
accompanying drawings. It is to be understood, however, that the drawings
are designed solely for purposes of illustration and not as a definition
of the limits of the invention, for which reference should be made to the
appended claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
In the drawings, wherein like reference characters denote similar elements
throughout the several views:
FIG. 1 is a graph depicting the results of a computer simulation in which
the extended unambiguous range of the method and apparatus of the present
invention (heavy line) and the restricted range of conventional
synthetic-wavelength methods are compared;
FIG. 2 is a block diagram representation of a first embodiment of the
invention including a simple two-color source, an amplitude-division
interferometer and an object surface whose position is to be determined;
FIG. 3 is a block diagram representation of another embodiment of the
invention in which a second detector and a dichromatic beam splitter
element have been added to the embodiment of FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a block diagram representation of a still further embodiment of
the invention in which a multiple-order interference filter has been added
to the embodiment of FIG. 1 for controlling and modifying the spectral
characteristics of the illumination source;
FIG. 5 is a graph depicting the transmission properties of the
multiple-order transmission filter of the embodiment of FIG. 4; and
FIG. 6 is a graph depicting the superimposed spectra of two broadband
sources.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The present invention is directed to a methodology for extending, in a
two-color interferometric distance measuring procedure, the effective
synthetic wavelength .LAMBDA.(see Equation 5, infra) so as to
correspondingly extend the unambiguous range of distance or topographical
surface feature measurement. Extension of the unambiguous range enables,
by way of example, the measurement of test specimen surface features or
discontinuities larger than .LAMBDA./2. The inventive methodology by which
the effective synthetic wavelength and, thereby, the unambiguous
measurement range, are extended consists of a manner of operating on and
utilizing the phase data interferometrically generated from each of the
two source illumination colors; thus, the advantageous functionality of
the invention may be realized utilizing substantially conventional
metrology apparatus for generating the phase data. The invention further
provides preferred apparatus for implementing the novel methodology herein
disclosed.
In order to facilitate a clear and complete understanding of the underlying
principles of the invention, it is first reiterated from the
above-described Background of the Invention that the optical phase .phi.
repeats at intervals of R.sub.n =n.lambda., while the synthetic phase
.PHI.(.PHI.=.phi.-.phi..sub.2) repeats at intervals of R.sub.N =N.LAMBDA..
In conventional two-color interferometry--as is generally understood and
has been described in numerous articles and patents including, by way of
example, the publications mentioned hereinabove--there is a natural limit
of .+-..LAMBDA./2 imposed on the attainable unambiguous range, which
limitation is based on the repetition of the synthetic phase .PHI. at
intervals equal to the synthetic wavelength .LAMBDA.. In accordance with
the instant invention, however, it is recognized that the phase couple
(.PHI..phi.)--composed of the combination of the optical phase .phi. and
the synthetic phase .PHI.--repeats at intervals for which R.sub.N
=R.sub.n. These intervals may be very much larger than the synthetic
wavelength .LAMBDA..
Proceeding mathematically, when the two repeat distances R.sub.N and
R.sub.n are set equal to one another, it is found that
##EQU7##
where n.sub.R and N.sub.R are the values of the respective integers n and
N for which the couple (.PHI..phi.) repeats itself. Normally, the
coefficient n.sub.R /N.sub.R will be some non-integer rational number, and
the integers n.sub.R and N.sub.R may have to be very large to approximate
that number. If .LAMBDA.=10.1.multidot..lambda., for example, then n.sub.R
=101 and N.sub.R =10. The repeat distance N.sub.R..LAMBDA. for this
particular example is, therefore, ten times the synthetic wavelength.
The underlying principle of the invention having been demonstrated by these
discussions, preferred apparatus and methods for achieving an extended
unambiguous range in accordance with the instant invention are now
presented.
If the source wavelengths used in an interferometer are adjustable or are
otherwise selectable over a small range, then the procedure summarized
below can be employed to assure that the synthetic wavelength satisfies
the requirements of the extended-range algorithm for a multiplier N.sub.R
:
Step 1: Choose a desired unambiguous range that is an integral multiple
N.sub.R of the present synthetic wavelength .LAMBDA.;
Step 2: Choose a value n.sub.R such that the ratio n.sub.R /N.sub.R is
approximately .LAMBDA./.lambda.;
Step 3: Confirm that the chosen ratio of n.sub.R to N.sub.R does not
satisfy the repeat condition for smaller values of N.sub.R --i.e. confirm
that the ratio n.sub.R /N.sub.R cannot be expressed using integers n.sub.R
and N.sub.R smaller than the integers chosen in the foregoing steps 1 and
2; and
Step 4: Adjust .LAMBDA. until it conforms as closely as possible to
Equation 9.
Once the two-color source has been characterized according to this
procedure, the following method extends the unambiguous range by making
full use of the spatial evolution of the phase couple (.PHI..phi.). In
deriving this method, it should first be recalled that Equation 6 provides
an estimate n' of the optical-wavelength integer fringe order that is
valid over a range of .+-..LAMBDA./2; both the synthetic and optical
phases .PHI., 100 appear in this equation. Now if L is larger than
.LAMBDA., fractional errors equal to N times the non-integer part of the
ratio of .LAMBDA. to .lambda. will be introduced into Equation 6; these
fractional errors are therefore an indication of the integer synthetic
fringe order. From these observations, one may derive a formula that
yields an estimate of N' which can be used to extend the unambiguous
range, as follows:
##EQU8##
The resulting estimate of N' can then be used in the following Equation 11
to provide a corrected estimate n" of the optical fringe order valid over
the extended range:
##EQU9##
The final calculation of the distance L is carried out by utilizing the
estimate n" to first obtain
##EQU10##
and then, constraining the final answer to the extended range .+-.N.sub.R
.LAMBDA./2, using the relationship
##EQU11##
The above-described inventive methodology for processing of the phase date
is summarized below:
Step 1: Measure the optical phases .phi. and .phi..sub.2, and calculate the
difference .PHI.;
Step 2: Use Equation 6 to obtain an initial estimate n' of the optical
fringe order; the fractional error in this estimate relates to the
synthetic fringe order;
Step 3: Use Equation 10 and the calculated estimate n' to estimate the
synthetic fringe order N';
Step 4: Use Equation 11 to obtain a corrected estimate n" of the optical
fringe order;
Step 5: Use Equation 12 to calculate an intermediate distance value L".
Step 6: Use Equation 13 to constrain the final optical path length distance
value L to the range of .+-.N.sub.R .LAMBDA./2.
Careful consideration of the details of this method indicates that the
signal-to-noise ratio, the phase measurement precision, and the wavelength
stability requirement for obtaining an extended range are proportionally
more stringent for increasing values of the range multiplier N.sub.R.
However, these requirements are no more exacting and difficult to achieve
than the requirements that must otherwise be met if the unambiguous range
were conventionally extended by simply enlarging the synthetic wavelength.
Thus, the present invention does not demand any greater precision in phase
measurement or wavelength stabilization, for a given unambiguous range,
than that which is required by prior art techniques.
In its broadest sense, therefore, the present invention is directed to a
method for extending the unambiguous range of two-color interferometry to
a distance N.sub.R .LAMBDA. by consideration of the couple (.PHI..phi.),
and in this manner fully utilizing optical-wavelength phase information
that is discarded in prior art synthetic-wavelength techniques. It will
also be recognized, given the teachings of the present invention, that
similarly advantageous results may in principle be achieved by equivalent
algebraic manipulations, or by inspection of the couple (.phi.,
.phi..sub.2); nevertheless, it should be pointed out that the particular
methods described herein provide systematic, efficient and readily
apprehensible computational techniques for determining the extended range
and for calculating distances over this extended range and are,
accordingly, currently preferred. Furthermore, these preferred
computational techniques have been conveniently described using the
intuitive concept of a synthetic wavelength A and a range multiplier
N.sub.R.
A practical example of an extension of the unambiguous range of measurement
through use of the methodology of the present invention is graphically
illustrated in FIG. 1. For this example, a first optical wavelength
.lambda.=612.4 nm and a second wavelength .lambda..sub.2 =648.0 nm were
selected, yielding a synthetic wavelength .LAMBDA.=11.146 .mu.m which
corresponds to a ratio n.sub.R /N.sub.R of 91/5. Utilizing a computer
simulation, a plurality of modulo 2 .pi. phases .phi. and .phi..sub.2 were
generated for a range of round-trip optical path differences L. Proceeding
from Equations 6, 10, 11 and 12, the original distances were recovered
without ambiguity over a range of 5.LAMBDA.=56 .mu.m. For comparison, the
results of the conventional synthetic-wavelength algorithm utilizing only
Equations 6 and 7 are also depicted in FIG. 1; the conventional algorithm
can only be used over a range of 11 .mu.m.
The teachings provided herein can therefore be applied to any measurement
system employing two source wavelengths to remove interferometric phase
ambiguities. A specific apparatus for implementation of the inventive
methodology will now, by way of example, be described.
Referring to FIG. 2, an interferometric measurement system with extended
unambiguous range capability includes a two-color source 1 and an
amplitude-division Michelson interferometer 2. The measurement system is
operable to determine the position of a target 3 which, in the figure, is
represented as one of the two mirrors of the interferometer.
The source 1 in the embodiment of FIG. 2 is itself comprised of a first
individual source 4 and a second individual source 5, each of which may
for example be light-emitting diodes, laser diodes, gas lasers, or like
narrow band or quasi-monochromatic devices. The individual sources 4, 5
are controlled by respective electrical means 7, 6. The electrical means
6, 7 will typically include appropriate stabilization circuitry as may be
required for selecting and/or maintaining the source wavelengths for a
chosen extended range. Semiconductor sources such as light-emitting diodes
and laser diodes, by way of example, may be conveniently controlled by
adjusting the excitation current, which adjustment has the effect of
varying the emission wavelength. Not shown in the figures are any
associated wavelength monitoring devices or systems that may be
appropriate or required for facilitating wavelength stabilization. The
emissions from the individual sources 4, 5 are combined by a
partially-reflective element 8 and are then transmitted to the
interferometer 2.
The interferometer in FIG. 2 is comprised of a beam-splitting element 9
that transmits one portion of the beam to a reference mirror 10 and the
other beam portion to the target 3. The reference mirror 10 is actuated by
an electro-mechanical transducer 11, such as a piezo-electric crystal, and
associated drive electronics 12 so as to effect precisely-controlled
displacements of the mirror 10 on the order of one-eighth (1/8) of one
optical wavelength. These small displacements are required for many of the
common phase detection schemes known in the art such, for example, as that
described by P. Hariharan, F. F. Oreb, and T. Eiju in Digital
Phase-Shifting Interferometry: A Simple Error-Compensating Phase
Calculation Algorithm, 26 Applied Optics 2504-06 (1987). The two beams
reflected from the target 3 and reference mirror 10 are recombined and
projected onto a detector 13 which generates an electrical signal
proportional to the resultant beam intensity produced by the interference
effect. This electrical signal is received and processed by electronic
data acquisition and analysis means 14.
The measurement procedure is initiated by determining, first, an
instantaneous interferometric phase .phi. for the individual source 4 and,
then, the phase .phi..sub.2 for the individual source 5. This may be
accomplished by switching these sources alternately on and off so as to
not confuse the two interference patterns. The distance calculation then
proceeds in accordance with the methodology described hereinabove.
Although the general appearance and functionality of the apparatus depicted
in FIG. 2 may at first glance appear to be known, it should be recognized
that the manners in which the illumination source is characterized and the
phase information is processed are entirely different from prior art
apparatus and techniques. The inventive methodology permits and, indeed,
may encourage the use of sources that would be adjudged as having
insufficient unambiguous range when using conventional methods. For
example, in the practice of the present invention the source 4 may be a
Helium-Neon gas laser oscillating at 632.8 nm and the source 5 may be a
tunable laser diode operating at 780 nm. Such a combination may in
accordance with the invention prove useful in the modification of existing
interferometers based on Helium-Neon lasers, as for the purpose of
measuring discontinuous step heights on a target surface or the metrology
of rough surfaces, or in the calculation of the radius of curvature of an
optical component under test. The resulting synthetic wavelength of 3.35
.mu.m is, however, too small for many applications if the unambiguous
range is limited to this value, a limitation which would be present in the
use of prior-art techniques. Since there exists a much wider choice of
laser diodes in the near-infrared--including wavelength-stabilized and
high-power devices--it is undesirable to substantially lower the diode
wavelength for the sole purpose of extending the unambiguous range;
rather, it would be far more advantageous under these circumstances to
employ the teachings of the present invention without changing the sources
already present in the apparatus.
Further advantages readily attainable in accordance with the invention will
be appreciated by reference to FIG. 3 which depicts an alternative
apparatus embodiment. This second embodiment is substantially the same as
that depicted in FIG. 2 but further includes a second detector 15 and a
dichromatic beam splitter element 16, thus enabling simultaneous
illumination of the interferometer by both source colors which are
separated, before detection, by the dispersing prism 16. Such an
arrangement is similar to that employed by A. F. Fercher, H. Z. Hu and U.
Vry in Rough Surface Interferometry With A Two-Wavelength Heterodyne
Speckle Interferometer, 24 Applied Optics 2181-88 (1985). As should of
course be apparent, the complete and efficient separation of the two
colors of source illumination is essential to the successful operation of
these systems. Generally, this separation is more efficient and less
costly to obtain where the source colors are widely separated in
wavelength, a goal that is readily attainable with the present invention
without sacrificing unambiguous range. Other methods of separating the
illumination colors--as by spectral filtering, for example with
interference filters, diffraction gratings or the like--similarly benefit
from the methods herein taught in accordance with the invention.
FIG. 4 depicts a further embodiment of the invention in which a
multiple-order filter element 17 has been added to the basic apparatus
illustrated in FIG. 2. The filter 17 may for example be of the Fabry-Perot
interference type, such as may be provided by a single or double layer of
dielectric material on a suitable transparent substrate, or by a pair of
partially reflective mirrors maintained in parallel relation and separated
by a small air gap, thus forming what is commonly referred to as an
air-gap etalon. The resulting transmission as a function of wavelength is
in the form of a series of peaks of width .alpha. and separation .beta..
Two of these transmission peaks are shown in FIG. 5, there illustrated for
the case in which the filter 17 is implemented by an etalon having an air
gap of 8.75 .mu.m. The source 1 for this embodiment is formed by two
light-emitting diodes, or similar broad-band devices, separated in
wavelength by .DELTA..lambda. and each having a spectral width
.delta..lambda.. An example of the superimposed output spectra for two
devices emitting at 625 nm and 675 nm, respectively in the FIG. 4
apparatus is shown in FIG. 6. From FIG. 6 may be seen that the filter 17
is so designed that the two source colors overlap the peaks in the
transmission spectrum shown in FIG. 5. Apart from the additional
additional introduction thereto of the filter 17, the procedure for making
measurements utilizing the apparatus of FIG. 4 is the same as that
described hereinabove for the apparatus depicted in FIG. 2--that is, the
individual sources are turned alternately on and off to obtain independent
phase information for each of the two colors emitted by the source 1.
The filter 17 in FIG. 4 performs two functions. The first is to precisely
define the transmitted wavelengths of the two-color source 1 so as to
relax the wavelength stabilization requirements on the individual devices
4, 5, and the second is to reduce the effective linewidth of the
individual colors from .delta..lambda. to .alpha., thus increasing the
coherence length so that the interferometer may operate over a larger
operational range with good fringe contrast. These two features constitute
extremely useful improvements to conventional two-color interferometry.
However, the filter 17 will properly function only if the separation
.beta. of the transmission peaks of the two illumination sources or
devices 4, 5 exceeds the spectral width .delta..lambda. by a sufficient
margin to prevent the emissions of a single device from simultaneously
overlapping both transmission peaks. This constraint imposes an effective
limit on the achievable synthetic wavelength utilizing this FIG. 4
configuration. For example, common red light-emitting diodes have spectral
linewidths of approximately 25 nm. Thus, the transmission peak separation
must be at least 50 nm to prevent accidental overlap, corresponding to a
synthetic wavelength of about 7 .mu.m. The method of the present invention
enlarges the unambiguous range without narrowing the spectral separation
| | |