 |
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to a motor-driven power steering
apparatus for an automobile or a motor vehicle for assisting a driver in
steering the vehicle by manipulating a steering wheel. More particularly,
the invention is concerned with a motor-driven power steering apparatus
which can ensure improved return performance of the steering wheel without
involving degradation in the linearity of assist torque control.
2. Description of the Related Art
For a better understanding of the invention, description will first be made
of a motor-driven power steering apparatus known heretofore.
FIG. 5 is a block diagram showing schematically a configuration of a
motor-driven power steering apparatus known heretofore, which is
disclosed, for example, in Japanese Unexamined Patent Application
Publication No. 35664/1985 (JP-A-60-35664).
Referring to the figure, the power steering apparatus is equipped with a
torque sensor 1 for detecting a steering torque T of a steering wheel (not
shown) and a vehicle speed sensor 2 for detecting a vehicle speed V. An
output shaft of an electric motor 3 is operatively coupled to the steering
wheel. The electric motor 3 is electrically connected to a DC power supply
source such as an onboard battery 4 via a bridge circuit constituted by
two pairs of switching elements such as switching transistors, i.e., a
first pair of switching elements Q.sub.1 and Q.sub.4 and a second pair of
switching elements Q.sub.2 and Q.sub.3 for allowing the motor 3 to be
driven selectively in either one of forward and backward directions.
Fly-wheel diodes D.sub.1 to D.sub.4 are connected across the switching
elements Q.sub.1 to Q.sub.4, respectively. A resistor 5 is inserted-in a
current path between the battery 4 and the bridge circuit mentioned above.
A motor current detecting means 6 is provided for detecting a current I
supplied to the motor 3 through the resistor 5.
The outputs of the torque sensor 1, the vehicle speed sensor 2 and the
motor current detecting means 6 are supplied to a signal processing unit 7
which is adapted to control the switching elements Q.sub.1 ; Q.sub.4 or
Q.sub.2 ; Q.sub.3 or the basis of the steering torque T, the vehicle speed
V and the motor current I and includes a target value calculating means
(not shown) for arithmetically determining or calculating a target current
value I.sub.0 of the motor current I on the basis of the steering torque T
and the vehicle speed V as detected, a control quantity calculating means
(not shown) for calculating a control quantity for controlling the motor 3
on the basis of a deviation or difference between the detected motor
current I and the target current value I.sub.0, a converting means for
converting the control quantity mentioned above into PWM (Pulse Width
Modulated) signal for controlling the switching elements Q.sub.1 ; Q.sub.4
or Q.sub.2 ; Q.sub.3 and a driving circuit (not shown) for driving the
switching elements in accordance with duty cycles or ratios indicated by
the PWM signals.
Next, description will turn to operation of the conventional power steering
apparatus shown in FIG. 5.
It is assumed, by way of example, that a driver of the motor vehicle tries
to rotate the steering wheel in the rightward (clockwise) direction. In
that case, the signal processing unit 7 outputs the driving signal for
controlling conduction of the paired switching elements Q.sub.1 and
Q.sub.4 in dependence on the steering torque T and the vehicle speed V as
detected by the torque sensor 1 and the vehicle speed sensor 2,
respectively. At this juncture, it should be mentioned that there are
provided first and second driving modes for controlling the switching
elements (Q.sub.1 ; Q.sub.4 or Q.sub.2 ; Q.sub.3). In the first driving
mode, one of the switching elements (Q.sub.4 or Q.sub.3) in each pair of
the switching elements (Q.sub.1 ; Q.sub.4 or Q.sub.2 ; Q.sub.3) is held in
the conducting (ON) state while the other one (Q.sub.1 or Q.sub.2) is
controlled in dependence on the duty cycle of the PWM signal. On the other
hand, in the second driving mode, both of the paired switching elements
(Q.sub.1 and Q.sub.4 or Q.sub.2 and Q.sub.3) are driven in accordance with
the duty ratio of the PWM signal.
It is assumed again, by way of example, that the first driving mode is
validated and that the switching elements Q.sub.1 and Q.sub.4 are in
charge of controlling the forward rotation of the motor 3 while the
switching elements Q.sub.2 and Q.sub.3 are to control the backward
rotation of the motor 3.
When the driver rotates the steering wheel in the clockwise direction
(which corresponds to the forward rotation of the motor 3), the signal
processing unit 7 outputs correspondingly a forward motor rotation signal.
In that case, one Q.sub.4 of the paired switching elements Q.sub.1 and
Q.sub.4 is so controlled as to be held constantly in the conducting state
while the other one Q.sub.1 is repetitively turned on and off in
accordance with the duty ratio of the PWM signal.
During a period in which the switching transistor Q.sub.1 is turned on, a
DC current is supplied to the motor 3 via a current path extending from
the battery 4 to the ground through the resistor 5, the switching element
Q.sub.1, the motor 3 and the switching element Q.sub.4, which results in
that the motor 3 is rotated in the forward direction (corresponding to the
clockwise rotation of the steering wheel). In this manner, the motor 3
generates an output torque of magnitude which depends on the duty ratio of
the PWM signal with which the switching element Q.sub.1 is turned on and
off. The output torque of the motor 3 thus aids the driver in steering the
motor vehicle by reducing correspondingly the steering torque T applied by
the driver. When the steering torque T applied to the steering wheel is
cleared, the steering wheel automatically returns to the neutral or center
position under a self-aligning torque.
As can be seen from the above description, the switching element Q.sub.4 is
held in the conducting (ON) state even when the switching element Q.sub.1
is turned off in the first driving mode. Consequently, a closed circuit is
formed by the switching element Q.sub.4, the fly-wheel diode D.sub.2 and
the motor 3, as indicated by arrows shown in FIG. 5. Accordingly, when the
motor 3 is rotated due to external forces such as a self-aligning torque,
a load torque and the like, which act to return the steered road wheels to
their original neutral positions, in the state mentioned above (i.e., when
the switching element Q.sub.4 is in the conducting state with the
switching element Q.sub.1 being off), a current flows, as indicated by the
arrows, which results in that the motor 3 generates a torque which is
utterly independent of the torque control. In this conjunction, it should
be noted that no means is provided for turning off the switching element
Q.sub.4. Consequently, the current flowing through the motor 3 in the
state mentioned above can not be controlled.
The torque generated by the motor 3 independent of the power steering
control, as described above, acts as a regenerative braking force when the
steering wheel returns to the center position under the self-aligning
torque and thus reduces the returning speed of the steering wheel.
For solving the problem mentioned above, it is conceivable to validate the
second driving mode to thereby turn on/off the switching element Q.sub.4
together with the switching element Q.sub.1 in accordance with the duty
ratio of the PWM signal. In that case, the frequency of the PWM signal
will necessarily increase. Consequently, under the influence of inductance
of the motor 3, linearity in the relation between the duty ratio of the
PWM signal and the output torque of the motor 3 is degraded whereby the
control performance of the power steering apparatus is lowered.
Next, differences in the return characteristic of the steering wheel and
the linearity due to difference in the output torque of the motor 3
between the first and second driving modes will be elucidated below in
detail.
FIGS. 6A and 6B are waveform diagrams illustrating voltages (solid-line
curve) and currents I (broken-line curve) of the motor 3 in the first and
second driving modes, respectively.
As can be seen by comparing the waveforms shown in the figures, the motor
current I in the first driving mode differs from that in the second
driving mode. Such a difference in the motor current I can be ascribed to
a difference in the on/off time constant due to a difference in ohmic
resistance, for example, of the switching element Q.sub.4 between the
first and second driving modes. More specifically, when inductance of the
motor 3 is assumed as being constant, the time constant of the motor
circuit including the resistance, the switching element Q.sub.4 and the
motor 3 is in reverse proportion to the on/off resistance of the switching
element Q.sub.4. Thus, the time constant assumes a large value in the
first driving mode in which the switching element Q.sub.4 is constantly
held in the on-state while the time constant is small in the second
driving mode where the switching element Q.sub.4 is turned on and off.
For the reason mentioned above, the time constant for the regenerative
brake current of the motor 3 when the switching element Q.sub.4 is off in
the first driving mode is large, as is shown in FIG. 6A. This means that a
long time is taken for the motor current I to attenuate, although a high
linearity can be assured between the duty ratio of the SW signal and the
torque generated by the motor 3. Consequently, the return characteristic
of the steering wheel is degraded.
On the other hand, in the second driving mode shown in FIG. 6B, the
above-mentioned time constant is small. Consequently, the motor current I
changes rapidly when the switching elements Q.sub.1 and Q.sub.4 are turned
off. In other words, the motor current I tends to decrease to zero
immediately in response to a change of the PWM signal to the off-level.
However, because of poor linearity, the control of the motor current I or
output torque to a desired value becomes unstable particularly in a
control region where the current 1 is large, bringing about fluctuations
in the output torque as well as generation of acoustic control noise by
the motor 3.
FIG. 7 is a characteristic diagram illustrating relation of the motor
output torque (motor current I) to the duty ratio of the PWM signal,
wherein the output torque generated when the steering wheel is rotated
rightwardly or clockwise is shown in the first quadrant with the output
torque generated upon leftward or counterclockwise rotation of the
steering wheel being shown in the third quadrant. Arrows shown in FIG. 7
indicate the direction in which the frequency of the PWM frequency
increases. It will be seen from this figure that the linearity is degraded
when the driving mode is changed over from the first driving mode (a) to
the second driving mode (b).
More specifically, it is apparent from FIG. 7 that the output torque
characteristic is represented substantially by a linear function of the
duty ratio (i.e., the output torque characteristic exhibits high
linearity) in the first driving mode represented by a graph (a). On the
other hand, in the second driving mode represented by graphs (b), the
output torque characteristic takes a curvilinear form and degradation in
the linearity becomes more remarkable as the frequency of the PWM signal
increases.
Further, in the second driving mode, ripple components of the motor current
I generated upon turning-on/off of the switching elements Q.sub.1 and
Q.sub.4 become more remarkable when compared with the motor current in the
second driving mode, resulting in generation of radio noise as well as
heat generation of the switching elements Q.sub.1 to Q.sub.4 and the
ripple suppressing capacitor.
As is obvious from the foregoing discussion, the power steering apparatus
known heretofore in which the switching elements Q.sub.1, Q.sub.4 are
controlled only in one of the first and second driving modes is
disadvantageous in that the return performance of the steering wheel is
poor in the first driving mode and that the linearity of the PWM control
is degraded in the second driving mode.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In the light of the state of the art described above, it is an object of
the present invention to provide a motor-driven type power steering
apparatus for a motor vehicle in which high linearity can be realized in
the relation between the motor output torque and the duty ratio of the PWM
signal and in which the steering wheel return performance can be improved.
In view of the above and other objects which will become apparent as
description proceeds, there is provided, according to a general aspect of
the present invention, a motor-driven power steering apparatus for a motor
vehicle, which apparatus comprises a torque sensor for detecting a
steering torque applied to a steering wheel, a vehicle speed sensor for
detecting speed of the motor vehicle, an electric motor for assisting
manipulation of the steering wheel, two pairs of switching elements
connected in the form of a bridge circuit together with the electric motor
for allowing the motor to rotate selectively in either one of forward and
backward directions, a motor current detecting means for detecting the
current flowing through the electric motor, and a signal processing unit
for driving the switching elements on the basis of the steering torque,
the vehicle speed and the motor current, wherein the signal processing
unit includes a steering wheel return decision means for deciding whether
or not the steering wheel of the motor vehicle is in a return state in
which the steering wheel is returned to a center position, a target
current value arithmetic means for arithmetically determining a target
current value of the motor current on the basis of the steering torque and
the vehicle speed, a control quantity arithmetic means for arithmetically
determining a control quantity for the electric motor in dependence on a
deviation of the motor current from the target Current value, a selecting
means for generating first and second control quantities corresponding to
first and second driving modes, respectively, on the basis of the control
quantity outputted from the control quantity arithmetic means and for
selecting one of the first and second control quantities in dependence on
the result of decision as to the return state of the steering wheel, a
conversion means for converting the first and second control quantities
into first and second PWM duty ratios, respectively, for controlling the
switching elements, and a driving circuit for driving the switching
elements on the basis of the first or second PWM duty ratio, wherein the
selecting means generates the first control quantity corresponding to the
first driving mode when the steering wheel is decided as not being in the
return state while generating the second control quantity corresponding to
the second driving mode when the steering wheel is decided as being in the
return state, and wherein the driving circuit responds to the first PWM
duty ratio to thereby hold constantly the switching element in each while
turning on and off the other switching element in each pair with the first
PWM duty ratio, while the driving circuit responds to the second PWM duty
ratio by turning on and off both of the switching elements in each pair
with the second PWM duty ratio.
With the arrangement of the power steering apparatus described above, high
linearity can be maintained in the relation between the motor output
torque and the PWM duty ratio selected for the first driving mode in the
normal manipulation of the steering wheel, whereby a smooth steering
torque control can be realized with unwanted radio noise and heat
generation of circuit components being suppressed to a minimum. On the
other hand, upon return of the steering wheel to the neutral or center
position under a self-aligning torque, regenerative braking action of the
motor can be suppressed through the control in the second driving mode.
Thus, the steering-wheel manipulation performance can significantly be
improved.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the steering-wheel return state
decision means determines the state of the steering wheel on the basis of
a deviation of the motor current from the target current value and outputs
the state of the steering wheel as determined.
With this arrangement, the steering-wheel return characteristic can be
improved with a simplified and inexpensive circuit configuration.
It is preferred that the steering-wheel return state decision means
presumes that the steering wheel is in the return state when the motor
current exceeds the target current value by a predetermined value.
By virtue of this feature, the steering-wheel return state can be
determined with high accuracy and reliability.
Further, the conversion means may include correcting means for correcting
difference between the first and second PWM duty ratios upon change-over
of the first and second driving modes.
Owing to this arrangement, the linearity of the torque control can be
improved even in the second driving mode.
The above and other objects, features and attendant advantages of the
present invention will more easily be understood by reading the following
description of the preferred embodiments thereof taken, only by way of
example, in conjunction with the drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an arrangement of a motor-driven type
power steering apparatus according to a first embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 2 is a view illustrating graphically a conversion characteristic of a
first conversion means for determining a first PWM duty ratio in a first
driving mode in dependence on a first control quantity;
FIG. 3 is a view similar to FIG. 2 and shows a conversion characteristic of
a second conversion means for determining a second PWM duty ratio for a
second driving mode in dependence on a second control quantity;
FIG. 4 is a flow chart for illustrating operation of the power steering
apparatus shown in FIG. 1;
FIG. 5 is a diagram showing schematically a circuit configuration of motor
driven power steering apparatus known heretofore;
FIGS. 6A and 6B are waveform diagrams illustrating motor currents in the
first and second driving modes, respectively; and
FIG. 7 is a characteristic diagram illustrating characteristically
relations of the motor output torque (motor current I) to duty ratios of a
PWM signal.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Now, the present invention will be described in detail in conjunction with
preferred or exemplary embodiments thereof by reference to the drawings.
Embodiment 1
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an arrangement of the motor-driven type
power steering apparatus according to a first embodiment of the invention
with a part of the apparatus being shown in a circuit diagram. In the
figure, the reference symbols 1 to 6, Q.sub.1 to Q.sub.4 and D.sub.1 to
D.sub.4 denote parts or components same as or equivalent to those
described hereinbefore by reference to FIG. 5. Further, it is to be
understood that the reference symbols T, V and I have the same meanings as
those described previously.
Referring to FIG. 1, a signal processing unit 70, which functionally
corresponds to the one designated by the reference numeral 7 in FIG. 5,
includes a steering-wheel return decision means 71, a target current value
arithmetic means 72, a subtractor 73, a motor control quantity arithmetic
means 74, a selecting means 75, a conversion means 76 and a driving
circuit 77.
The steering-wheel return decision means 71 serves for deciding whether the
steering wheel is in the return state (i.e., the steering wheel is to be
rotated back to the neutral or center position). When the return state of
the steering wheel is determined by the steering-wheel return decision
means 71 on the basis of, for example, the steering torque T detected by
the torque sensor 1 and a current deviation or difference (mentioned
below), the steering-wheel return decision means 71 outputs a decision
result signal H indicative of the return state of the steering wheel.
The target current value arithmetic means 72 serves for arithmetically
determining or calculating a target current value I.sub.0 of the motor
current on the basis of the steering torque T and the vehicle speed V to
thereby generate a signal representing the target current value I.sub.0
and a rotating direction command R indicating the direction in which the
motor 3 is to be rotated. The target current value I.sub.0 is inputted to
the subtractor 73 which subtracts the actually measured value of the motor
current I from the target current value I.sub.0 to thereby determine the
current deviation .DELTA.I mentioned above. On the basis of the this
current deviation .DELTA.I, the control quantity arithmetic means 74
arithmetically determines a control quantity C for controlling the motor 3
through a PID (proportional-plus-integral-plus-differential) control. The
current deviation .DELTA.I is also inputted to the steering-wheel return
decision means 71 together with the steering torque T.
The selecting means 75 generates a first control quantity C1 and a second
control quantity C2 corresponding to the first and second driving modes,
respectively, on the basis of the control quantity C outputted from the
control quantity arithmetic means 74 and selects one of the control
quantities C1 and C2 in dependence of the decision result of the
steering-wheel return decision means 71. Unless the decision result H
indicating the steering-wheel return state is outputted from the decision
means 71, the selecting means 75 generates the first control quantity C1
corresponding to the first driving mode, while the selecting means 75
generates the second control quantity C2 corresponding to the second
driving mode when the decision result H is outputted.
Here, it is to be noted that there are following relationships between
control quantities C, C1 and C2:
C=C1=C2
However, the first and second control quantities C1 and C2 have a piece of
information representative of the first driving mode and the second
driving mode, respectively.
In this embodiment, P1 and P2 are determined by looking up the map as
illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3, but they can be determined by use of a
function. For example, P1 can be determined from a linear function having
variables T and V, and P2 can be determined from a combination of two or
more linear functions.
The conversion means 76 serves for converting the first and second control
quantities C1 and C2 into first and second PWM duty ratios P1 and P2 for
the PWM signal for controlling the switching elements Q.sub.1 ; Q.sub.4 or
Q.sub.2 ; Q.sub.3 and is comprised of first conversion means 76a for
converting the first control quantity C1 to the first PWM duty ratio P1
and a second conversion means 76b for converting the second control
quantity C2 to the second PWM duty ratio P2. At this juncture, it should
be mentioned that the conversion means 76 should preferably include a
correcting means for smoothing change-over of the first and second PWM
duty ratios P1 and P2 to each other upon changing over of the first and
second driving modes. The correcting means may be incorporated in the
conversion means 76b corresponding to the second driving mode in which the
linearity between the duty ratio of the PWM signal and the motor torque is
degraded as described hereinbefore.
The driving circuit 77 drives the switching elements such as the switching
elements Q.sub.1 and Q.sub.4 on the basis of the first PWM duty ratio P1
or the second PWM duty ratio P2 on the assumption that the steering torque
for rotating the steering wheel in the clockwise direction. More
specifically, the driving circuit 77 responds to the first PWM duty ratio
P1 to thereby turn on one (e.g. Q.sub.4) of the paired switching elements
(Q.sub.1 and Q.sub.4) and hold it in the conducting state while turning on
and off the other switching element Q.sub.1 in accordance with the duty
ratio of the first PWM duty ratio P1. On the other hand, in response to
the second PWM duty ratio P2, the driving circuit 77 drives both the
paired switching elements Q.sub.1 and Q.sub.4 in accordance with the first
PWM duty ratio P2.
FIG. 2 is a view illustrating graphically a conversion characteristic of
the first conversion means 76a for determining the first PWM duty ratio P1
in the first driving mode in dependence on the first control quantity C1.
As previously pointed out by reference to FIG. 7, the torque control for
the motor 3 can enjoy a good linearity in the first driving mode.
Accordingly, the above-mentioned conversion characteristic can be
represented at least approximately by a linear function.
FIG. 3 is a view similar to FIG. 2 and shows a conversion characteristic of
the second conversion means 76b for determining the second PWM duty ratio
P2 for the second driving mode in dependence on the second control
quantity C2. In the second driving mode, the torque control for the motor
3 is poor in the linearity, as described hereinbefore by reference to FIG.
7. Accordingly, the conversion characteristic of the second conversion
means 76b is so determined as to cancel out the non-linearity of the motor
torque control characteristic.
Next, description will turn to operation of the power steering apparatus
according to the instant embodiment of the invention by reference to FIGS.
2 and 3 along with a flow chart of FIG. 4.
At first, in a step S1, the target current value arithmetic means 72
fetches the steering torque T from the output of the torque sensor 1. In a
step S2, the target current value arithmetic means 72 fetches the vehicle
speed signal from the output of the vehicle speed sensor 2 to calculate
the vehicle speed V. In a step S3, the steering torque T undergoes a phase
compensation in dependence on the vehicle speed V. In a step S4, the
target current value arithmetic means 72 determines the direction R of
rotation of the motor 3 as well as the target current value I.sub.0 of the
motor current for assisting the steering. More specifically, when the
steering torque T changes at a high rate as a function of time, the target
current value I.sub.0 is set to a large value by taking into account a
phase advance of the steering torque T. On the other hand, in the running
state of the automobile where the vehicle speed V is high, the target
current value I.sub.0 is set to a small value because the assist torque
may be small in this case.
Subsequently, in a step S5, the motor current I supplied from the motor
current detecting means 6 is fetched and subtracted from the target
current value I.sub.0 by the subtractor 73 to thereby determine the
current deviation .DELTA.I (step S6).
Further, the control quantity arithmetic means 74 determines the control
quantity C for controlling the motor 3 through a PID
(proportional-pulse-integral-plus-differential) control on the basis of
the current deviation .DELTA.I (steps S7 and S8). The control quantity C
for the motor 3 is given in terms of the duty ratio of the PWM signal for
driving the switching elements Q.sub.1 and/or Q.sub.4.
The steering-wheel return decision means 71 decides whether or not the
steering torque T is greater than a predetermined value (e.g., 10 Kgf-cm)
in a step S9. When the result of this decision step S9 is negative (NO),
then a step S10 is executed to determine whether or not the current
deviation .DELTA.I(=I.sub.0 -I) is greater than a predetermined value
(e.g., 3 amperes).
When it is decided that the steering torque T is greater than the
predetermined value in the step S9 or alternatively the current deviation
.DELTA.I is smaller than the predetermined value in the step S10, the
steering-wheel return decision means 71 determines that the steering wheel
is not in the return state but in the normal steering state. Consequently,
the steering-wheel return decision means 71 does not generate the decision
result H indicating the steering-wheel return state.
Unless the decision result H is generated, the selecting means 75 generates
the first control quantity C1 for the first driving mode on the basis of
the control quantity C. In response, the first conversion means 76a
incorporated in the conversion means 76 determines the first PWM duty
ratio P1 on the basis of the first control quantity C1 in accordance with
the converting function (FIG. 2) for the first driving mode in a step S11,
whereby the corresponding PWM signal is inputted to the driving circuit
77.
Thus, the switching elements Q.sub.1 and Q.sub.4 are driven in the first
driving mode. More specifically, one (Q.sub.4) of the switching elements
Q.sub.1 and Q.sub.4 is constantly held in the conducting state while the
other switching element (Q.sub.1) is driven (i.e., turned on and off) in
accordance with the first PWM duty ratio P1.
In this manner, in the case of the normal steering state, the power
steering operation enjoying a high linearity in the torque control for the
motor 3 can be realized, whereby fluctuation in the assist torque,
generation of audible noise of the motor 3 and radio noise as well as heat
generation of the circuit components can be suppressed satisfactorily.
On the other hand, when it is decided in the step S9 that the steering
torque T is smaller than the predetermined value, it is then determined in
step S10 whether the current deviation .DELTA.I is greater than the
predetermined value. The steering-wheel return decision means 71 then
determines that the steering wheel is in the return state, whereby the
decision result H indicating the steering-wheel return state is generated.
In general, decrease of the steering torque T as applied by the driver
below a predetermined value indicates a high probability of return of the
steering wheel to the neutral or center position. Besides, the current
deviation .DELTA.I which is greater than a predetermined value, i.e., the
motor current I greater than the target current value I.sub.0 by a
predetermined value, equally indicates a high probability of return of the
steering wheel and hence regenerative mode of the motor 3. Accordingly,
when both conditions mentioned above are satisfied, it can reasonably be
regarded that the steering wheel is in the return state.
When the decision result H is generated by the steering-wheel return
decision means 71, the selecting means 75 changes over the first driving
mode to the second driving mode for improving the return performance of
the steering wheel. In the second driving mode, the second control
quantity C2 is generated on the basis of the control quantity C. Thus, the
second conversion means 76b incorporated in the conversion means 76
determines the second PWM duty ratio P2 in accordance with the function
for conversion illustrated in FIG. 3 (step S12). The second PWM duty ratio
P2 thus determined is inputted to the driving circuit 77.
Consequently, the switching elements Q.sub.1 and Q.sub.4 are driven with
the second PWM duty ratio P2 in the second driving mode. In other words,
both the paired switching elements Q.sub.1 and Q.sub.4 are turned on and
off in accordance with the second PWM duty ratio P2. Thus, in the
steering-wheel return state, the follow-up characteristic of the motor
current I is improved, whereby the assist torque generated by the motor 3
can be controlled accurately to a demanded value, as a result of which
there can be realized the power steering which can enjoy excellent
steering-wheel return performance.
The selecting means 75 includes a timer. When the timer indicates the lapse
of a predetermined time after the change-over to the second driving mode,
the selecting means 75 decides that the steering-wheel return operation
has been completed and automatically changes over the second driving mode
to the first driving mode in order to restore the high linearity of the
assist torque control. The conditions for changing over the driving modes
should preferably be so set as to conform with the specifications of the
automobile in which the power steering apparatus is actually installed by
selecting the reference level for the change-over of the driving modes
while taking into consideration other factors such as hysteresis involved
in the control so that unwanted hunting or the like phenomenon can be
suppressed.
Since the conversion means 76 can select appropriately the first PWM duty
ratio P1 or the second PWM duty ratio P2 upon change-over to the first or
second driving mode, the steering wheel can positively be protected
against shock or the like undesirable phenomena without the need of paying
attention to the change-over timing based on the decision result H of the
steering-wheel return decision means 71.
As will now be understood from the foregoing description, according to the
teachings of the invention incarnated. In the illustrated embodiment,
there can be realized a silent and smooth torque control for the steering
assist motor owing to high linearity between the first PWM duty ratio P1
and the motor current I (motor output torque) in the first driving mode
for the normal steering operation with unwanted generation of radio noise
and heat being suppressed to a minimum, while in the second driving mode
for return of the steering wheel to the center position under the
selfaligning torque, the regenerative braking action of the motor 3 can be
suppressed by validating the second driving mode.
In the foregoing description, it has been assumed that the motor 3 is
rotated in the forward or rightward direction in the first and second
driving modes by controlling the switching elements Q.sub.1 and Q.sub.4,
it goes without saying that the similar torque control can be accomplished
equally when the motor 3 is rotated in the leftward direction by
controlling similarly the switching elements Q.sub.2 and Q.sub.3.
Embodiment 2
In the case of the first embodiment, the steering-wheel return decision
means 71 decides the steering-wheel return state on the basis of the
steering torque T and the current deviation .DELTA.I. However, similar
effects can be achieved by estimating the rotation speed (rpm) of the
motor 3 on the basis of either one of the steering torque T or the current
deviation .DELTA.I or alternatively on the basis of an observer which is a
calculation method for calculating a motor generating voltage Em and a
rotational number (number of revolutions per minute) Nm of the motor based
on a motor resistance R, a motor current Im (i.e., the current supplied to
the motor), and a motor drive voltage Vm (i.e., the voltage supplied to
the motor). Namely, the motor drive voltage Vm and the motor generating
voltage Em are expressed as follows:
Vm=Im.times.R+Em (1)
Em=K.times.Nm (2)
where K is a coefficient. In equation (1) above, Vm and Im are first
determined or detected, and R is estimated to thereby determine Em. From
thus determined or estimated Em, Nm is obtained using equation (2) above.
Embodiment 3
According to the third embodiment of the invention, it is proposed to
detect straight-forwardly the steering wheel return state by using a
steering-wheel angle sensor or a motor rotation speed sensor to thereby
generate the decision result H on the basis of the outputs of these
sensors.
Embodiment 4
In the case of the first embodiment, the correcting means is incorporated
in the conversion means 76 for the purpose of smoothing the change-over of
the driving modes by correcting the PWM duty ratio. However, the
correcting means may be omitted. In that case, although degradation of
linearity in the torque control in the second driving mode can not be
evaded, the steering-wheel return performance can be improved.
Many features and advantages of the present invention are apparent form the
detailed description and thus it is intended by the appended claims to
cover all such features and advantages of the system which fall within the
true spirit and scope of the invention. Further, since numerous
modifications and combinations will readily occur to those skilled in the
art, it is not intended to limit the invention to the exact construction
and operation illustrated and described. Accordingly, all suitable
modifications and equivalents may be resorted to, falling within the
spirit and scope of the invention.
* * * * *
|
|
 |
|
 |
Description |
|
