WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Projection exposure apparatus and semiconductor device manufacturing method    
United States Patent5436692   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/5436692.html
Inventor(s)Noguchi; Miyoko (Tokyo, JP)
AbstractA projection exposure apparatus includes an illumination optical system for constituting illumination source for illuminating an original having an exposure pattern, the illumination optical system including changing mechanism for changing a shape of the illumination source; a projection optical system for projecting an image of the exposure pattern onto a surface to be exposed; an adjuster responsive to the changing mechanism to adjust the projection optical system.
   














 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History
Drawing from US Patent 5436692
Projection exposure apparatus and semiconductor device manufacturing

     method - US Patent 5436692 Drawing
Projection exposure apparatus and semiconductor device manufacturing method
Inventor     Noguchi; Miyoko (Tokyo, JP)
Owner/Assignee     Canon Kabushiki Kaisha (Tokyo, JP)
Patent assignment
All assignments
Publication Date     July 25, 1995
Application Number     08/321,455
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     October 11, 1994
US Classification     355/53 355/71
Int'l Classification     G03B 027/72
Examiner     Wintercorn; Richard A.
Assistant Examiner    
Attorney/Law Firm     Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
Address
Parent Case     This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/227,699 filed Apr. 14, 1994, now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/131,413 filed Oct. 4, 1993, now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 07/925,863 filed Aug. 7, 1992, now abandoned.
Priority Data     Aug 09, 1991[JP]3-225223 Aug 09, 1991[JP]3-225226
USPTO Field of Search     355/53 355/67 355/52 355/71
Patent Tags     projection exposure semiconductor manufacturing
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
5363172
Tokuda
355/71
Nov,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5357312
Tounai
355/67
Oct,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5345292
Shiozawa
355/67
Sep,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5337097
Suzuki
353/101
Aug,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5335044
Shiraishi
355/53
Aug,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5305054
Suzuki
355/53
Apr,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5160962
Miura

Nov,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5061956
Takubo

Oct,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
4988188
Ohta
353/122
Jan,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
4939630
Kikuchi
362/268
Jul,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4871257
Suzuki
356/400
Oct,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4851882
Takahashi
355/46
Jul,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4814829
Kosugi
355/43
Mar,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4754307
Burki
355/46
Jun,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4739373
Nishi
355/53
Apr,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


What is claimed is:

1. A projection exposure apparatus comprising:

an illumination optical system comprising an illumination source for illuminating an original having an exposure pattern, said illumination optical system including a changing mechanism for changing a shape of the illumination source, said changing mechanism including a selecting mechanism for selecting one of predetermined illumination source shapes, said selecting mechanism including a turret having a plurality of apertures for determining the illumination source shapes;

a projection optical system for projecting an image of the exposure pattern onto a surface to be exposed; and

adjusting means responsive to said changing mechanism to adjust said projection optical system.

2. An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said adjusting means adjusts aberration of said projection optical system.

3. An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said adjusting means adjusts field of curvature of said projection optical system.

4. An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said adjusting means adjusts one side blurness of said projection optical system.

5. An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said adjusting means adjusts pivotal inclination of said projection optical system.

6. An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said adjusting means adjusts projection magnification of said projection optical system.

7. An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said adjusting means adjusts a distance between the original and said projection optical system.

8. An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said adjusting means adjusts power of said projection optical system.

9. An apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising input means for inputting information indicative of a kind of the original, wherein said changing mechanism changes the shape in accordance with information inputted to said input means.

10. An apparatus according to claim 9, wherein said input means includes a bar code reader for reaching a bar code on the original.

11. An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said illumination optical system includes a radiation source and an optical integrator, and wherein said illumination source is formed behind the optical integrator as a second illumination source.

12. An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said plural illumination source shapes includes one corresponding to a zone including the optical axis.

13. An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said plural illumination source shapes include one corresponding to a zone outside the optical axis.

14. An apparatus according to claim 13, wherein said one has a substantially circular ring shape around the optical axis.

15. An apparatus according to claim 13, wherein the one has a substantially rectangular ring shape around the optical axis.

16. An apparatus according to claim 13, wherein the one has four illumination source portions in respective quadrants in an orthogonal coordinate with its origin at the optical axis.

17. An apparatus according to claim 16, wherein the exposure pattern is substantially codirectional with the ordinate and the abscissa of the coordinate.

18. A projection exposure apparatus comprising:

an illumination optical system comprising an illumination source for illuminating an original having an exposure pattern, said illumination optical system including a changing mechanism for changing a shape of the illumination source, said changing mechanism including a selecting mechanism for selecting one of predetermined illumination source shapes, wherein the selecting mechanism includes a turret having a plurality of apertures for determining the illumination source shapes,

a projection optical system for projecting an image of the exposure pattern onto a surface to be exposed; and

processing means responsive to said changing means to change a parameter and for calculating an optical property of said projection optical system.

19. An apparatus according to claim 18, wherein the optical property includes at least one of focus point and projection magnification of said projection optical system.

20. An apparatus according to claim 18, further comprising adjusting means responsive to said processing means to adjust said projection optical system.

21. An apparatus according to claim 18, further comprising input means for inputting information indicative of a kind of the original, wherein said changing mechanism changes the shape in accordance with information inputted to said input means.

22. An apparatus according to claim 21, wherein said input means includes a bar code reader for reaching a bar code on the original.

23. A projection exposure apparatus, comprising:

an illumination optical system constituting an illumination source for illuminating an original having an exposure pattern, said illumination optical system including a changing mechanism for changing the shape of the illumination source;

a projection optical system for projecting an image of the exposure pattern onto the surface to be exposed; and

processing means, responsive to said changing mechanism to change a parameter, for calculating an optical property of said projection optical system, other than the focus point and the projection magnification thereof.

24. An apparatus according to claim 23, further comprising adjusting means responsive to said processing means to adjust said projection optical system.

25. An apparatus according to claim 23, further comprising input means for inputting information indicative of the type of the original, wherein said changing mechanism changes the shape of the illumination source in accordance with the information inputted to said input means.

26. An apparatus according to claim 25, wherein said input means includes a bar code reader for reading a bar code provided on the original.

27. A projection exposure apparatus, comprising:

an illumination optical system having an illumination source, for illuminating an original having an exposure pattern, said illumination optical system including means for changing the shape of said illumination source;

a projection optical system for projecting an image of the exposure pattern onto a surface to be exposed; and

processing means responsive to said changing means to change a parameter for calculating a change in the optical property of said projection optical system, other than the imaging position and the projection magnification thereof.

28. A exposure apparatus, comprising:

means for changing the shape of an illumination source illuminating a pattern;

a projection optical system for projecting an image of the pattern illuminated by said illumination source, onto a substrate; and

means for adjusting an aberration of said projection optical system, in accordance with the change in said illumination source.

29. An apparatus according to claim 28, wherein said adjusting means adjusts the distortion of the image of the pattern illuminated.

30. An apparatus according to claim 28, wherein said adjusting means adjusts the field of curvature of said projection optical system, in accordance with the change in said illumination source.

31. An apparatus according to claim 30, wherein said adjusting means adjusts the distortion of the image of the pattern illuminated.

32. An apparatus according to claim 28, wherein said changing means serves to define one of an on-axis illumination source and an off-axis illumination source.

33. An exposure apparatus, comprising:

means for changing the shape of an illumination source illuminating a pattern;

a projection optical system for projecting an image of the pattern illuminated by said illumination source, onto a substrate; and

means for adjusting one side blurness of said projection optical system, in accordance with the change in said illumination source.

34. An apparatus according to claim 33, wherein said changing means serves to define one of an on-axis illumination source and an off-axis illumination source.

35. An exposure apparatus, comprising:

means for changing the shape of an illumination source illuminating a pattern;

a projection optical system for projecting an image of the pattern illuminated by said illumination source, onto a substrate; and

means for adjusting the pivotal inclination of said projection optical system, in accordance with the change in said illumination source.

36. An apparatus according to claim 26, wherein said changing means serves to define one of an on-axis illumination system and an off-axis illumination system.
 Description Submit all comments and votes
 


FIELD OF THE INVENTION AND RELATED ART

The present invention relates to a projection exposure apparatus and a semiconductor device manufacturing method, more particularly to the apparatus and method in which even if a reticle pattern illumination method is changed, a high optical performance can be maintained.

The recent development in the semiconductor manufacturing device manufacturing techniques, and the development in the fine processing techniques, are remarkable. 1M DRAM semiconductor device requires the photoprocessing technique for sub-micron resolution. Heretofore, the resolution has been improved by means of increasing NA (numerical aperture) with a constant exposure light wavelengths. However, the recent developments include the change of the exposure light from g-line to i-line, using ultra high pressure mercury lamp. With the use of the g-line and i-line, the photoresist process has also been developed. Thus, the developments in the optical system and the photoresist system has been contributable to the developments in the photolithographic process.

It is generally known that the depth of focus of an exposure apparatus in the form of a stepper is reversely proportional to NA squared. Therefore, when the sub-micron resolution is provided, the depth of focus decreases correspondingly.

Japanese Patent Application No. 28631/1991 under the name of the assignee of this application has proposed a projection exposure apparatus having a higher resolution provided by the structure of illumination system depending on the pattern to be projected and the line width.

In order to maintain the satisfactory resolution, it is important that the optimum focus point of the projection optical system does not change. However, when the exposure light is applied to the projection optical system to project the pattern of the reticle onto the wafer, the projection optical system absorbs a part of the exposure light, with the result of heat generated in the projection optical system. If this occurs, the temperature of the lens material itself and the temperature between or around the lens materials, change, and therefore, the optical performance of the projection optical system changes. In other words, the optimum focus point of the projection optical system changes.

In the above-mentioned Japanese Patent Application, the illumination method is changed depending on the directions of the pattern of the reticle and the required line width, and the optical path in the projection optical system changes, accordingly. Then, the absorptions of the exposure beam in the projection optical system change, and the change in the optical system is different. For example, the ways of changes in the optimum focus point and the projection magnification, may be different.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, it is a principal object of the present invention to provide a projection exposure apparatus and method in which the high optical performance is maintained even if the illumination method is changed.

It is a further object of the present invention to provide a semiconductor device manufacturing method in which the illumination method is selected in accordance with the nature of the circuit pattern, so that the semiconductor devices can be produced with high precision.

These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent upon a consideration of the following description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a systematic diagram of the projection exposure apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 illustrates a relationship between a pupil of a projection optical system and an optical integrator.

FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate the pupil of the projection optical system.

FIGS. 4A and 4B illustrate the aperture of the optical system.

FIG. 5 shows a cable extending from an ultra high pressure mercury lamp.

FIG. 6 illustrates a variation of a focus point of a projection optical system when it absorbs a part of the exposure light energy.

FIG. 7 illustrates a pupil of another projection optical system.

FIG. 8 illustrates reading of bar code on a reticle surface.

FIG. 9 is a system diagram of an apparatus according to a second embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 10 illustrates a pupil of a projection optical system of another illumination method.

FIG. 11 shows a lens arrangement of a projection optical system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 12 illustrates a manufacturing system for manufacturing a semiconductor device.

FIG. 13 is a flow chart showing semiconductor device manufacturing process steps.

FIG. 14 is a flow chart of a wafer process.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Embodiment 1

FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a projection exposure apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention. Denoted at 11 is a light source (radiation source) comprising an ultra-high pressure Hg lamp, for example. The point of light emission of it is disposed adjacent to the first focal point of an elliptical mirror 12. The light produced by the lamp 11 is collected by the elliptical mirror 12. Denoted at 13 is a deflecting mirror, and denoted at 14 is a shutter for restricting the quantity of light to be passed. Denoted at 15 is a relay lens system for efficiently directing the light from the lamp 11 to an optical integrator 17 through a wavelength selecting filter 16. The optical integrator 17 comprises a plurality of small lenses arrayed two-dimensionally, to be described later.

In this embodiment, the manner of imaging to the optical integrator 17 may be either under critical illumination or under Koehler illumination. Also, the exit port of the elliptical mirror 12 may be imaged on the optical integrator 17. The filter 16 serves to select and pass only a desired wavelength component or components out of the light from the Hg lamp 11.

Denoted at 18 is a stop shape adjusting member (selecting means) comprising a turret having plural stops of different aperture shapes and sizes, disposed after the optical integrator. The stop shape adjusting member 18 operates to select predetermined ones of the small lenses of the optical integrator 17 in accordance with the shape of the optical integrator 17. That is, in this embodiment, the manner of illumination suitable to the configuration of a pattern of a semiconductor integrated circuit, concerned, is selected and the exposure process is executed in the selected manner of illumination. Details of selection of small lenses will be explained later.

Denoted at 19 is a mirror for deflecting the light path, and denoted at 20 is a lens system for collecting the light passing through the adjusting member 18. The lens system 20 plays an important role in providing uniformness of illumination. Denoted at 21 is a half mirror for dividing the light from the lens system 20 into reflected light and transmitted light. Of the divided lights, the light reflected by the half mirror 21 goes through a lens 38 and a pinhole 39 to a photodetector 40. The pinhole 39 is provided at a position which is optically equivalent to the reticle 30 having a pattern to be printed. The light passing through the pinhole 39 is detected by the photodetector 40, for controlling the amount of exposure.

Denoted at 22 is a mechanical blade called a masking blade, whose position can be adjusted by a driving system (not shown) in accordance with the size of the pattern region of the reticle 30 to be illuminated. Denoted at 34 is a mirror; at 24 is a lens system; at 25 is another mirror; and at 26 is another lens system. These elements serve to illuminate the reticle 30 planed on the reticle stage 37 wit the light from the Hg lamp 11.

A projection optical system 31 projects a focused pattern of the reticle 31 onto the wafer 32. The wafer 32 is attracted and supported on a wafer chuck 33, and the wafer chuck 33 is carried on a stage 34 controlled in response to a detection of a laser interferometer 36. A mirror 35 is placed on the wafer stage 34 and is effective to reflect the light from the laser interferometer 36.

Light projecting system 52 and a light receiving system 53 detect a surface level (in the direction of the optical axis 31b) of the wafer 32. The beam from the light projecting system 52 is formed as a spot on the wafer 32. The beam reflected by the wafer 32 is incident on a position sensor of the light receiving system 53, and an image of a-light source is formed. In the surface level detecting position for the wafer 32, as shown in the figure, the light reflection point on the wafer 32 surface and a light incident point on the position sensor of the light receiving optical system, are disposed in an imaging relation, so that the vertical positional deviation of the wafer 32 is detected on the basis of the light incident point on the position sensor.

In this embodiment, the light exit surface 17a of the optical integrator 17 is substantially in an optically conjugate relationship with a pupil plane 31a of the projection optical system 31 with the intervention of the elements denoted at 19, 20, 23, 24, 25 and 26. Namely, an effective light source image corresponding to the light exit surface 17b, is formed on the pupil plane 31a of the projection optical system 31.

Referring now to FIG. 2, the relationship between the pupil plane 31a of the projection optical system 31 and the light exit surface 17a of the optical integrator 17 will be explained. The configuration of the optical integrator 17 corresponds to the configuration of the effective light source as formed on the pupil plane 31a of the projection optical system 31. This is shown in FIG. 2 wherein the shape of the effective light source image 17c on the light exit surface 17b as formed on the pupil plane 31a of the projection optical system 31 is illustrated superposedly. For standardization, the radius of the pupil 31a of the optical integrator 31 is taken as 1, and, within this pupil 31a, the small lenses of the optical integrator 17 are imaged to form the effective light source image 17c. In this embodiment, each small lens of the optical integrator has a square shape.

Here, orthogonal coordinates which define the major directions to be used in design of a semiconductor integrated circuit are taken on x and y axes. These directions correspond to the major directions of the pattern formed on the reticle 30, and they substantially correspond to the directions of the outside configuration (square shape) of the reticle 30.

Generally, if the wavelength is denoted by .lambda., the parameter is denoted by k.sub.1 and the numerical aperture is denoted by NA, then the resolution RP can be given by:

RP=k.sub.1..lambda./NA

The case wherein a high resolution illumination system provides its power is a case where the k.sub.1 factor takes a level about 0.5.

In the present embodiment, in consideration thereof, under the influence of a particular stop of the adjusting member 18, only the light that passes through selected ones of the small lenses of the optical integrator 17, selected in accordance with the shape of the pattern on the reticle 30 surface, is used to illuminate the reticle 30.

More specifically, selection of small lenses is such that the light is allowed to pass through plural zones on the pupil plane 31a of the projection optical system 31, other than the central zone thereof.

FIGS. 3A and 3B are schematic views each illustrating on the pupil plane 31a the manner of selection of light, passing through particular ones of the small lenses of the optical integrator 17 selected by a particular stop of the adjusting member 18. In these drawings, the painted areas depict light-blocked regions. The blank areas depict those regions to which the light come.

More specifically, FIG. 3A illustrates an effective light source image upon the pupil plane 31a to be defined in an occasion where resolution is required with respect to x and y directions. Assuming the circle representing the pupil 31a as x.sup.2 +y.sup.2 =1, the following four circles should now be considered:

(x-1).sup.2 +y.sup.2 =1

x.sup.2 +(y-1).sup.2 =1

(x+1).sup.2 +y.sup.2 =1

x.sup.2 +(y+1).sup.2 =1

With these four circles, the circle representing the pupil 31a is divided into eight zones 101-108.

The illumination system of high resolution and deep depth of focus with respect to the x and y directions, is accomplished in this embodiment by selected projection, with priority, of the light to small lens groups in such zones denoted by reference numerals of even number, that is, the zones 102, 104, 106 and 108. Since the small lenses adjacent to the origin (x=0, y=0) are mainly contributable to enlarging the depth with respect to a rough pattern, whether those at the central portion are to be selected or not is a matter of selection to be determined by the pattern to be printed.

In the example of FIG. 3A, those small lenses around the center are excluded. The portion outside the optical integrator 17 is light-blocked by an integrator holding member (not shown) within the illumination system. In FIGS. 3A and 3B, for easy understanding of the relationship between the small lenses to be light-blocked and the pupil 31a of the projection lens, the pupil 31a and the effective light source image 17c of the optical integrator are drawn in superposition.

On the other hand, FIG. 3B illustrates the configuration of a stop to be used in an occasion where high resolution is required with respect to patterns of .+-.45 deg. Similarly to the FIG. 4A case, there is illustrated the relationship between the pupil 31a and the effective light source image 17c of the optical integrator 17. For such .+-.45 deg. patterns, under the same conditions as in the preceding case, the following four circles are to be considered: ##EQU1## By drawing these four circles in superposition on the pupil 31a, like the FIG. 3A case, the pupil 31a is divided into eight zones 111-118. In this case, the zones which are contributable to enhancement of resolution to the .+-.45 deg. patterns are those zones denoted by reference numerals of odd number, that is, the zones 111, 113, 115 and 117. Thus, by selecting with priority those of the small lenses of the optical integrator 17 which present in these zones, to such .+-.45 deg. patterns the depth of focus is considerably enlarged at a k.sub.1 factor of about 1.5.

FIG. 4A illustrates an example of the stop shape adjusting member 18. As illustrated, a turret type stop interchanging system is adopted in this embodiment. A first stop 18a it to be used in a case where a pattern which is not so fine (k.sub.1 is not less than 1) is to be printed. The first stop 18a is of the same type as has been used in conventional illumination optical system, and it is a fixed stop and may be so set as to block the portion outside the small lenses of the optical integrator 17 as desired. Stops 18b-18d are selected in accordance with the type of a reticle pattern to be used.

In this embodiment, a secondary light source formed out of the optical system has independent light source portions in the four quadrants, respectively, of an orthogonal coordinates defined with the point of origin coincident with the optical axis, depending on the selection of the illumination system.

In this embodiment, a first original having a circuit pattern of relatively large minimum line width and a second original having a circuit pattern of relatively small minimum line width. When the first original is used, the secondary light source is formed adjacent to the optical axis as shown by an opening 18a in FIG. 4. When the second original is used, the secondary light sources are formed outside the optical axis as indicated by openings 18b, 18c and 18d in the same figure.

As for the configuration of the secondary light source outside the optical axis, it may be in the form of a circular ring-like or rectangular ring-like shape.

Generally, in an illumination system for providing a high resolution, for a higher spatial frequency it is advantageous to use an outside region, upon the pupil plane, beyond the size of the optical integrator 17 as required in conventional illumination systems. For example, while it may be preferable in a conventional illumination system to use small lenses within a radius of 0.5, in an illumination system for high resolution it may be preferable to use those small lenses in a circle of a maximum radius of 0.75 although the small lenses in the central portion are not used.

In consideration of this, it is desirable to set the size of the optical integrator 17 as well as the effective diameter of the illumination system and the like while taking into account both the conventional type and the high resolution type. Further, it is desirable that the light intensity distribution at the light entrance end 17a of the optical integrator 17 has a sufficient size so that it can function well even if a stop member is inserted. The possibility of blocking outside small lenses by the stop 18a is for the reason described above. It may be possible that, while an optical integrator 17 prepared is provided with a radius up to 0.75, the stop 18a serves to select a portion within a radius 0.5.

In this manner, the stop shape may be determined while taking into account the specificness of a pattern of a semiconductor integrated circuit to be manufactured and, by doing so, it is possible to provide an exposure apparatus best suited to the pattern. The selection of stops may be executed automatically under the influence of a control computer which may be provided to control the operation as a whole of the exposure apparatus. What is illustrated in FIG. 4A is an example of stop shape adjusting member formed with such stops and, in this example, a desired one of four types of stops 18a-18d can be selected. As a matter of course, the number of stops may be easily increased as desired. An example is illustrated in FIG. 4B. In this example, stops 18a-18d are of the same structure as the those of FIG. 4A example. Stop 18e has an opening of a size smaller than the stop 18a. Stop 18f has an opening of further reduced size. Stop 18g has a ring-like opening having a central light blocking portion. Stop 18h has a rectangular ring-like opening.

There is a possibility that, when a stop is selected, the non-uniformness of illuminance changes with the selection of stop. In this embodiment, in consideration thereof, the non-uniformness of illuminance in that occasion may be adjusted by using the lens system 20. The non-uniformness of illuminance can be adjusted finely by adjusting the spacing or spacings of lens elements of the lens system 20 in the direction of its optical axis. Denoted at 51 is a driving mechanism for moving a or some lens elements of the lens system 20. The adjustment of the lens system 20 may be made in response to the selection of a stop. If desired, it may be possible to replace the lens system 20 itself by a different one in accordance with the stop shape adjustment. In that occasion, plural lens systems 20 may be prepared and may be interchangeably used in a turret fashion in response to the selection of a stop shape.

In this embodiment, as described, by changing the shape of stop, an illumination system suitable to the characteristic of a pattern of a semiconductor integrated circuit is selected. Another feature of this embodiment resides in that, when an illumination system for high resolution is selected, the formed effective light source comprise four separate zones. What is important in this case is the balance of intensity of these four zones. In the arrangement of FIG. 1, however, there is a possibility that the shadow of a cable to the Hg lamp 11 adversely affects the balance. In order to avoid this, it is preferable in the illumination system for high resolution which uses the stop means shown in FIG. 4 to connect the cable so that the linear shadow of the cable comes to the position of the small lenses of the optical integrator as light-blocked by the stop.

Namely, in the example of FIG. 3A, it is preferable that the cable 11a is stretched in the x or y direction as illustrated in FIG. 5A. When the stop of FIG. 3B is used, it is preferable to that the cable 11a is stretched in a direction of .+-.45 deg. relative to the x or y direction as illustrated in FIG. 5B. In this embodiment, the direction of stretching the cable may be changed in accordance with the change of the shape of stop.

The description will be described as to the compensating method for optical characteristics changes occurs in the projection optical system, for example, a temperature change due to absorption of a part of exposure light energy.

When .DELTA.F.sub.1 and .DELTA.F.sub.2 are differences of focus change amount between non-exposure period and exposure period, at a time t, the following results:

.DELTA.F.sub.1 =I.sub.o.exp {-k.sub.2.t}

.DELTA.F.sub.2 =I.sub.o.{1-exp (-k.sub.1.t)}

Where I.sub.o is proportional to the absorbed energy, and k.sub.1 and k.sub.2 are thermal conductivity coefficient. The difference relating to the magnification change .DELTA..beta..sub.1 and .DELTA..beta..sub.2, the equations include substantially the same parameters.

Here, coefficient I.sub.o, k.sub.1 and k.sub.2 are called focus change coefficient. It is assumed that the initial optimum focusing surface (focusing position) of the projection optical system is F.sub.0 and the exposure beam is applied to the projection optical system from the point of time t.sub.0. Then, as shown in FIG. 6, the optimum focus surface changes with time until it is stabilized at a position F.sub.C at time t.sub.1. The position F.sub.C is a saturation point corresponding to the incident energy.

When the exposure light application is stopped at time t.sub.2, the optimum focusing surface returns in an exponential function fashion with time from the position F.sub.C to the initial position F.sub.0 (time t.sub.3). Thus, the change amount .DELTA.F from the initial level F.sub.0 to the saturated level F.sub.C changes proportionally to the illumination energy (the transmittance of the reticle and the illumination strength). The time constant T.sub.1 in the rising profile from time t.sub.o to time t.sub.1, and the time constant T.sub.2 of the falling profile from the time t.sub.2 to the time t.sub.3, are peculiar to the projection optical system.

Among the change amount .DELTA.F, the time constants T.sub.1 and T.sub.2, the focus change coefficients I.sub.o, K.sub.1 and K.sub.2, satisfy the following:

.DELTA.F=.DELTA.I=I.sub.o =I.sub.o..tau.xE

T.sub.1 =1/K.sub.1

T.sub.2 =1/K.sub.2

Where .tau. is a transmittance of the reticle, E is illumination light quantity per unit time. The parameters I.sub.o, K.sub.1 and K.sub.2 are different if the conditions of the light rays passing through the projection optical system, that is, the illumination method. The parameters .tau. and E can be predetermined based on measurements. The following calculations can be carried out on the basis of measurements of the opening and closing periods of the shutter 14 of the apparatus.

In view of the above, the optimum focus surface position is calculated using optimum parameters I.sub.o, K.sub.1 and K.sub.2 which are different depending on illumination method even when the same projection optical system is used.

Table 1 shows the parameters I.sub.o, K.sub.1 and K.sub.2 used by the calculating means upon the correction of the optical performance in the projection optical system 31 when the illumination methods 1 and 2 having the strength distribution on the pupil shown in FIGS. 7A and 7B, are shown.

TABLE 1 ______________________________________ Illumination Method Parameter 1 2 ______________________________________ I.sub.o (.mu.m) 1.2 1.1 K.sub.1 (/min) 0.2 0.15 K.sub.2 (/min) 0.2 0.15 ______________________________________

In this embodiment, the parameters are properly selected on the basis of the difference of the illumination method, so that the optical performance change at the time of the temperature change of the projection optical system attributable to the ejection light energy absorption, is corrected in precision, thus permitting high accuracy projection exposure.

The description will be made as to the correction method on the basis of the results of calculations from the calculating means 54 of FIG. 1. In this embodiment, the calculating means 54 detects the illumination method or mode for the reticle 30 on the basis of the signal from the driving means 50 for driving the aperture shape adjusting member 18. The calculating means 54 selects the focus coefficients I.sub.o, K.sub.1, K.s