|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 1006854
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3911107
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3152976
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 1892410
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5256701 Tamura 514/781 Oct,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5227161 Kessler 424/94.4 Jul,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5137718 Gillespie 424/78.24 Aug,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5116623 Khan 424/616 May,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4976733 Girardot 623/11.11 Dec,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4969912 Kelman 128/898 Nov,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4946673 Pollack 424/78.25 Aug,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4885005 Nashef 8/94.11 Dec,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4838888 Nashef
Jun,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4800603 Jaffe 8/94.11 Jan,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4801299 Brendel 623/1.47 Jan,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4798611 Freeman, Jr. 600/36 Jan,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4753652 Langer 623/1.42 Jun,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4729139 Nashef 8/94.11 Mar,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4648881 Carpentier 128/898 Mar,1987 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4647283 Carpentier 128/898 Mar,1987 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4526751 Gartner 424/78.25 Jul,1985 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4405327 Pollock 8/94.11 Sep,1983 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4402697 Pollock 8/94.11 Sep,1983 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4389487 Ries 435/273 Jun,1983 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4383832 Fraefel 8/94.11 May,1983 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4378224 Nimni 8/94.11 Mar,1983 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4323358 Lentz 8/94.11 Apr,1982 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4314800 Monsheimer 8/94.1R Feb,1982 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4278548 Bettinger 210/636 Jul,1981 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4120649 Schechter 8/94.11 Oct,1978 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4097234 Sohde 8/94.19R Jun,1978 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4083066 Schmitz 600/36 Apr,1978 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Many types of implantable devices for repairing or improving the function
of human body parts are known. Examples are vascular prostheses and
grafts, tissue valves, and even completely artificial organs. The material
that is used to make these implants or prostheses may be synthetic or it
may be actual tissue derived from man or from some other species. For
example, tissue implants often are derived from porcine or bovine sources.
When an implant is made of actual tissue, the tissue may be used fresh
from the donor; however, it is preferable to preserve the implant tissue
for later use.
One primary obstacle to successful implantation of actual tissue implants
is immune response against the implant by the recipient. Immune response
against an implant is a result of antigenic differences between cells of
the recipient and cells of the implant material. The recipient's natural
immune response is to attack the foreign antigens on the cells of the
tissue implant.
One widespread means used to overcome immune reactions against a tissue
implant is to fix and preserve the tissue implant using glutaraldehyde
before implantation. Theoretically, glutaraldehyde is believed to coat,
bind and cross-link the antigens on the surface of the tissue implant. As
a result, the number of antigens on the implant that are capable of
inducing an immune response in the recipient are reduced.
Glutaraldehyde-preserved tissue implants are relatively inert biologically
and have demonstrated long-term durability in some instances even though
the glutaraldehyde renders them somewhat cytotoxic. However,
glutaraldehyde treated implants also have demonstrated serious drawbacks,
such as tissue-fatigue and a propensity toward calcification.
Glutaraldehyde tends to leach out of a tissue implant into both the
surrounding tissue and into the bloodstream. Also, because glutaraldehyde
is cytotoxic, the cells exposed to the leached glutaraldehyde can be
damaged. Cells damaged by glutaraldehyde often die and/or rupture. Dead
and/or ruptured cells often serve as a nidus for calcification. In fact,
calcification has proven to be one of the primary reasons for failure of
glutaraldehyde-treated implants.
One solution to this calcification problem has been to fix and preserve
tissue implants using photooxidation rather than glutaraldehyde.
Photooxidation involves placing the tissue implant in saline, exposing the
implant to a photocatalytic dye, and then subjecting the implant to
fluorescent light. Photooxidation also modifies the structure of the
collagen and appears to provide new cross-links in the collagenous tissue.
However, implants that have been fixed using photooxidation do not exhibit
the same tendency to calcify as glutaraldehyde-treated implants.
Although photooxidative fixing of tissue implants shows great promise, the
implant still must be sterilized before it can be implanted in the
recipient. Unfortunately, the most common method used to sterilize a
tissue implant is to treat the implant with glutaraldehyde. Sterilization
with glutaraldehyde, even after the tissue implant has been fixed, still
could create a calcification problem. Therefore, it would be advantageous
if tissue implants could be sterilized without using glutaraldehyde.
Historically, many germicidal or disinfectant solutions have been used to
sterilize various objects and materials. The majority of such solutions
have been used to disinfect solid surfaces. However, some disinfectant
solutions have been used to disinfect soft surfaces, including human skin.
Some of the disinfectant solutions previously used to sterilize human
tissue, for example, the preparation known by the trademark
"Betadine.TM.," have been iodine-based. Although iodine-based
disinfectants have been used safely and effectively to sterilize the
surface of living tissue, iodine-based solutions have not been used to
sterilize non-living tissue such as the tissue found in a tissue implant.
Whether or not an iodine-based disinfectant solution can safely and
effectively sterilize the non-living tissue in a tissue implant is a valid
concern. Living tissue can survive relatively rigorous conditions because
living tissue is capable of repairing any damage that may result from such
conditions. In contrast, non-living tissue cannot repair itself. When the
proteins in non-living tissue are subjected to rigorous conditions, they
tend to denature. Denaturation of the protein in the tissue implant, which
cannot be repaired by the non-living tissue, detrimentally affects the
physical properties of the tissue implant.
A method of sterilizing tissue implants which does not cause protein
denaturation and which does not induce calcification in vivo would be
highly desirable.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides an iodine-based solution, and a method of
using that solution, which sterilizes tissue implants without denaturing
the proteins in the implant and without inducing calcification of the
implant in vivo. Preferably, the tissue implants sterilized using the
present invention are fixed without using glutaraldehyde. Most preferably,
the tissue implants are fixed using photooxidation.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIGS. 1-5 chart the results of the experiments discussed below.
FIG. 1A indicates the temperature at which sterilization took place and
charts the change in shrink temperature of a tissue implant dependent upon
the pH of the iodine sterilant used.
FIG. 1B indicates the pH at which sterilization took place and charts the
change in shrink temperature of a tissue implant dependent upon the
temperature at which the sterilization procedure took place.
FIG. 2A and 2B compare shrink temperatures, when ethanol was either present
(2B, 10%) or not present (2A) in the solution used to sterilize the tissue
implants, as a function of iodide:iodine ratios present in the sterilant.
FIG. 3A charts the change in shrink temperature dependent upon the iodine
concentration in a sterilization solution that has been buffered to a pH
of 6.5.
FIG. 3B charts the change in shrink temperature dependent upon the iodine
concentration in a sterilization solution that has been buffered to a pH
of 5.0.
FIG. 3C charts the change in shrink temperature dependent upon the
incubation temperature used with sterilization solutions having various
iodine concentrations and which have been buffered to a pH of 6.5.
FIG. 3D charts the change in shrink temperature dependent upon the
incubation temperature used with sterilization solutions having various
iodine concentrations and which have been buffered to a pH of 5.0.
FIG. 4 indicates sterilization conditions and charts the change in shrink
temperature dependent upon the time of incubation and the presence (4B,
10%) or absence (4A) of ethanol.
FIG. 5A is a transmission electron micrograph of collagen which has been
damaged by treatment with iodine at a relatively low pH (3.5) and high
temperature (42.degree. C.).
FIG. 5B is a transmission electron micrograph of substantially undamaged
collagen treated with iodine at a pH of 6.5 at 42.degree. C.
FIGS. 6A and 6B are photographs of x-rays of explanted tissue valves which
were treated according to the present invention which shows no evidence of
calcification.
FIGS. 7A, 7B, and 7C are photographs of x-rays of explanted tissue valves
which were treated with glutaraldehyde, and which show evidence of
calcification.
FIGS. 8A and 8B are photographs of x-rays of explanted Carpentier-Edwards
Porcine tissue valves which were treated with glutaraldehyde, and which
show evidence of calcification.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention involves the sterilization of tissue implants which
preferably have not been treated with glutaraldehyde. Most preferably, the
tissue implants used in the present invention will have been fixed
photooxidatively using the procedure described in U.S. patent application
Ser. No. 07/388,003.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the tissue implants are
sterilized using an iodine based germicidal solution under conditions
having four primary variables: time of incubation; temperature of
incubation; chemical content; and, pH of the germicidal solution. If any
one of these four parameters is too stringent, the tissue implant may be
damaged or the sterilization may be insufficient. Therefore, these
parameters must be carefully controlled.
Although it is possible not to add stabilizing salts to the iodine based
solution of the present invention, the solution preferably contains iodine
stabilizing salts which are believed to help maintain the elemental iodine
in a microbiocidal condition. A number of salts might be suitable for this
function, preferably halide salts, and most preferably iodide salts, such
as potassium and sodium iodide.
Another variable which tends to increase the microbial kill efficacy of the
present solutions is to refresh the solution at approximately 24 hour
intervals. If the solution is refreshed, solutions containing lower
concentrations of iodine appear to be more efficacious.
In order to avoid damaging the tissue implants, as the stringency of any
one of the following treatment parameters is increased within the
following ranges, the stringency of the other parameters should be
decreased:
______________________________________
Parameter Low High
______________________________________
elemental iodine 0.01% 0.20%
(I2)
potassium iodide 0% 0.40%
(KI)
sodium iodide (NaI)
0% 0.40%
ethanol 0% 20%
pH (aqueous 5.0 6.8
solution)
NaCl -- 4M
time of incubation
3 hours 2 weeks
incubation 20.degree. C.
50.degree. C.
temperature
______________________________________
A preferred embodiment of the present invention involves incubation of a
tissue implant at a temperature between about 35.degree.-39.degree. C. for
a period of time sufficient to sterilize the implant, typically between
about 46-50 hours, in a solution containing between about 0.09-0.11% each
of elemental iodine, potassium iodide, and sodium iodide and between about
1.8-2.0% ethanol, the solution having been buffered to a pH between about
6.4-6.6 using purified water and phosphate buffered saline. The ethanol
content of the solution described in these preferred embodiments is a
result of residual ethanol from the solution used to prepare the iodine
stock. Although the present invention is functional if additional ethanol
is present, no additional ethanol is added in these preferred embodiments.
A particularly preferred embodiment of the present invention involves
incubation of the implant at approximately 37.degree. C. for about two
days in a solution containing about 0.1% each of elemental iodine,
potassium iodide, and sodium iodide, about 1.9% ethanol, the solution
having been buffered to a pH of about 6.5 using purified water and
phosphate buffered saline.
In a preferred method of preparing the germicidal solution of the present
invention, a concentrated (10X) phosphate buffered saline solution ("PBS")
is prepared by combining about 76 gm NaCl, 35 gm Na.sub.2 HPO.sub.4, and
approximately 950 mL distilled or purified water (to a total volume of one
liter), and stirring the resulting mixture until the ingredients are
dissolved. Additional NaH.sub.2 PO.sub.4 is added (approximately 13.6-14
gm) until the pH of the resulting solution is about 6.5. Unless otherwise
specified, the chemicals used herein may be obtained from a number of
commercial sources, such as Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, Mo., or
Aldrich, 1001 West Saint Paul Avenue, Milwaukee, Wiss. 53233.
A preferred iodine stock solution is prepared by combining about 5.0 gm
each of elemental iodine (I.sub.2), potassium iodide, and sodium iodide,
with about 100 ml of 95% ethanol which has been prewarmed to about
37.degree. C. The mixture is swirled until the iodine is completely
dissolved. The resulting solution may be stored in the dark for up to one
month.
To prepare the solution for actual use to sterilize a tissue implant, the
following should be dissolved in about 850 mL distilled or purified water
in a 2 liter beaker or flask: about 100 mL 10X PBS stock solution; 20.0 mL
5% iodine stock solution. After all of the components have dissolved, the
pH of the solution should be adjusted to about 6.5 using the appropriate
sodium mono- and dibasic-phosphates, as needed. The solution then should
be brought to 1.0 liter using additional distilled or purified water, as
needed. The resulting solution should be filtered through a 0.2 micron
sterilizing filter into a sterile container which may be capped, sealed,
labeled, and stored at room temperature in the dark for up to a maximum of
one week.
In order to sterilize a tissue implant using the foregoing iodine solution,
the following preferred procedure should be performed within a laminar
flow hood. All personnel should wear appropriate attire, including gowns,
mask, hat, and sterile gloves. The following items should be placed within
the laminar flow hood: sterile 5 inch forceps; clean plastic jars;
prepared labels; prepared iodine solution. The implant container should be
opened and the tissue implant and test sample or "swatch leaflet" removed
using the sterile forceps. The containers should be opened one at a time
and the transfer should be completed before another tissue implant is
removed from another container. The tissue implant and swatch leaflet
should be placed in a clean plastic jar (such as a 3 oz. polypropylene
jar) and the prepared iodine sterilant should be poured into the jar until
the solution completely covers the valve (approximately 100 mL). The Jars
containing the implant, the test swatch, and the iodine solution should be
closed tightly and the outside of the jar should be wiped with a lint free
cloth and ethyl alcohol and labelled. Two empty jars then should be filled
with approximately the same volume of iodine and labeled as controls, and
all of the jars should be placed in an incubator which has been calibrated
to the desired temperature, preferably about 37.degree. C., and incubated
for 48.+-.2 hours, or for 24 hour increments after which the iodine
solution was refreshed.
After incubation, the jars should be removed from the incubator and placed
in the laminar flow hood, along with a sterile five inch forceps, clean
plastic jars, labels, and sterile 50% ethanol. The container should be
opened and the tissue implant and swatch leaflet removed from the
iodine/ethanol solution using the sterile forceps. The containers should
be opened one at a time. The implant should be placed into one clean jar
and the swatch leaflet placed into another, and 50% ethanol should be
aseptically poured into the jars until the implant and the swatch leaflet
are covered completely (approx. 100 mL). The jars then should be closed
tightly, and the outside of the jar should be wiped with a lint free cloth
and ethyl alcohol and labeled. Two control jars for later sterilization
testing then should be prepared by filling two empty jars with
approximately the same volume of 50% ethanol and labeling the jar | | |