|
|
|
| United States Patent | 5480683 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/5480683.html |
| Inventor(s) | Chabrol; Claude (Villeurbanne, FR);
Robelet; Marc (Unieux, FR);
Leveque; Robert (Firminy, FR);
Pichat nec Nedelec; Anne L. M. (St Etienne, FR);
Rieu; Jean F. E. (St Etienne, FR);
Rabbe; Louis M. (Fraisses, FR);
Rambert; Andre (Lyons, FR) |
| Abstract | A process for reducing the coefficient of friction and the wear between a
metal part and an organic polymer- or copolymer-based part, in an aqueous
medium containing chlorides, characterized in that the organic polymer- or
copolymer-based part is submitted to a surface treatment by ionic
implantation of elements selected from nitrogen, argon, oxygen and carbon. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
January 2, 1996 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
December 16, 1993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parent Case |
This is a continuation of Application No. 08/019,332, filed on Feb. 17,
1993, now abandoned; which is a continuation of Appln. No. 07/356,305
filed May 24, 1989, now abandoned. |
|
| Priority Data |
May 24, 1988[FR]88 06890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
|
|
|
| Market Size |
|
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market
sector:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Market Share |
|
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Reasonable Royalty |
|
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
|
| | |
| |
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
|
| Market Size | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Market Share | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Reasonable Royalty | N/A | [No votes] |
| | N/A | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Technical Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
We claim:
1. A process for simultaneously reducing the coefficient of friction and
the wear between a metal part and an organic polymer- or copolymer-based
part, in an aqueous medium containing chlorides, comprising the step of:
submitting the organic polymer- or copolymer-based part to a surface
treatment by ionic implantation of elements selected from the group
consisting of nitrogen, argon, oxygen and carbon in an amount and under
conditions sufficient to impart a reduced coefficient of friction and wear
to the part as compared to an organic polymer- or copolymer-based part
which is untreated.
2. Process according to claim 1, wherein the polymer is a polyethylene.
3. Process according to claim 1, wherein the implantation is carried out
with an energy of 10 to 300 keV.
4. Process according to claim 3, wherein the implantation is carried out
with an energy of 50 to 150 keV.
5. A process for simultaneously reducing the coefficient of friction and
the wear between a metal part and a polyethylene-based part, in an aqueous
medium containing chlorides, comprising the step of:
submitting the polyethylene-based part to a surface treatment of ionic
implantation of elements selected from the group consisting of nitrogen,
argon, oxygen and carbon in an amount and under conditions sufficient to
impart a reduced coefficient of friction and wear to the part as compared
to an organic polymer- or copolymer-based part which is untreated. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
The present invention relates to a process for reducing the coefficient of
friction and the wear between a metal part and an organic polymer- or
copolymer-based part and is used for artificial limb-joints and for
fittings working in marine environments.
Artificial limb-joints or rotating or sliding fittings generally include
two parts which rub against each other. Generally, at least one of these
parts is metal. The other is of polymer or is covered with an organic
polymer- or copolymer-based layer. The resistance to friction and to wear
of the couple is acceptable but could be improved by suitable surface
treatments.
Polyethylene is in general used as the polymer. The metals used are
generally stainless steels, or cobalt- or titanium-based alloys. In place
of metals, other materials can also be used (ceramics, composites such as
carbon-carbon, etc.).
The present invention aims to provide a process which allows in particular
the reduction of friction and the wear between such parts functioning in
an aqueous environment containing chlorides such as a physiological fluid
or a marine environment.
The invention is described with reference to the drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a graph of torque versus number of test cycles for various
materials,
FIG. 2 is a graph of wear rate versus time for various polyethylene
materials,
FIG. 3 is another graph of torque versus number of test cycles for various
materials, and
FIG. 4 is another graph of wear rate versus time for treated and untreated
polyetheylene.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION
The subject of the present invention is a process for reducing the
coefficient of friction and the wear between a metal part and an organic
polymer- or copolymer-based part, in an aqueous medium containing
chlorides, characterized in that the organic polymer- or copolymer-based
part is submitted to a surface treatment by ionic implantation.
The present invention can be applied in particular when the polymer is a
polyethylene, such as a high-density polyethylene, and with e very high
molecular weight, but other polymers can be used: low-density polymers,
reinforced polymers (fibres, particles . . .), etc.
The principle of ionic implantation consists of ionizing at least one
atomic type chosen from nitrogen, argon, oxygen, carbon or other, then of
accelerating it in an electric field at energies of to 500 keV, preferably
10 to 300 keV and even more advantageously 50 to 150 keV.
The operation is usually carried out under pressures of 10.sup.-2 to
10.sup.-4 Pa. Under these conditions, the ions penetrate into the polymer-
or copolymer-based layer to a depth which can extend to several microns.
The implantation dose is usually 10.sup.12 to 10.sup.17 ions/cm.sup.2.
The account of the following tests highlights the improvement obtained by
using the process according to the invention.
1) Ionic implantation of high-density polyethylene with a very high
molecular weight
The polyethylene used is ERTALENE HD 1000, CESTILENE MC (density 0.94,
elasticity module of 650 MPa), conforming to ISO 5834/2 and NF S90-418
standards and/or polyethylene with a high molecular weight.
Cylindrical samples (pawns) and semi-spherical samples (cups) of
polyethylene were submitted to an ionic implantation treatment with
nitrogen, argon, oxygen, carbon and others, in an apparatus perfected and
manufactured by UNIREC. (Robert LEVEQUE and Claude CHABROL, Application of
ionic implantation in mechanical construction, Journees de GAMI, 8 and 9
March 1988, Paris).
The implantation energy was 80 keV.
2) Tests
Tests for friction between polyethylene parts and metal parts (stainless
steel conforming to ISO 5832-I-NR S90-401 standards and titanium alloy
conforming to ISO 5832-III-NF S90-405 standards) on two machines perfected
and manufactured by Ecole Nationale Superieure des Mines de Saint-Etienne.
One of these machines is a pawn-disk type, the other is a sphere-cup type.
(A. PICHAT, J. RIEU, C. CHARBOL, A. RAMBERT, Effect of ionic implantation
on the resistance to wear and fatigue of materials for orthopaedic use.
Int. Symposium on wear-resistant materials, Bulletin du Cercle d'Etude des
Metaux, 1987, 15-14, p 9-1).
The tests are carried out on orthopaedic-quality parts manufactured by the
SERF company, in Decines.
The test conditions (stress, speed, environment) are similar to those for
an artificial hip.
All the tests are carried out in an artificial physiological fluid
(RINGER'S solution).
As an example, the results obtained on the stainless steel
sphere--polyethylene cup couple are reported in FIGS. 1, 2, 3 and 4.
The curves show the variation of the torque (FIG. 1) and that of the wear
rate of the polyethylene, expressed in loss of mass m (FIG. 2), as a
function of the time t and the number of cycles N with:
1 couple comprising untreated PE/untreated 316L stainless steel
2 couple comprising untreated PE/316L stainless steel implanted with
nitrogen
3 PE couple implanted with nitrogen/untreated 316L stainless steel
4 couple comprising PE implanted with nitrogen/316L stainless steel
implanted with nitrogen.
These tests were stopped at one million cycles; however, longer tests
enabled it to be verified that the beneficial effects of the implantation
were retained.
These results highlight the fact that in the absence of any implantation,
wear is significant and that in practice the implantation of the
polyethylene alone is already sufficient to obtain a couple with
significantly lower friction and rate of wear of the polyethylene (curve
3).
FIGS. 3 and 4 relate to the same tests of untreated 316L stainless steel
spheres in comparison with polyethylene cups untreated or treated by
implantation with argon ions. FIG. 3 shows that the torque is weaker when
the polyethylene is implanted with argon (curve 2) than when it is not
treated (curve 1, identical to curve 1 of FIG. 1).
FIG. 4 shows that the rate of wear .DELTA. m of the polyethylene is much
less (5 mg as opposed to 50 mg) when the polyethylene is implanted with
argon (curve 2) than when it is not treated (curve 1, identical to curve 1
of FIG. 2).
These results show that an ionic implantation of polyethylene with argon
gives a decrease in the friction torque and a reduction in the rate of
wear of the polyethylene in comparison to those obtained with an ionic
implantation of polyethylene with nitrogen.
During the tests of ionic implantation with argon and nitrogen, a small
quantity of carbon was introduced in an uncontrolled way which contributes
to the results of the tests described above.
* * * * *
|
|
|
|
|
Description  |
|
|
|
|
|