WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Transmission and reception in a hostile interference environment    
United States Patent5488632   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/5488632.html
Inventor(s)Mason; Arthur G. (Andover, GB2); Gledhill; Jeffrey J. (Chandlers Ford, GB2)
AbstractA low power OFDM signal may be transmitted in an environment where it is subject to interference from other transmissions, e.g. broadcast television services. In a receiver interference is reduced by ignoring information modulating OFDM carriers at the frequencies corresponding to the carriers of the interfering transmissions; adjacent channel interference is reduced by ignoring data on OFDM carriers at the band edges and interference from third order intermodulation products is reduced by the ignoring OFDM carriers affected. Image channel interference is reduced by using an intermediate frequency for a first mixing process in the receiver such that the image channel interference affects OFDM carriers at frequencies which are already being ignored by the receiver. Preferably no data is modulated onto OFDM carriers which are to be ignored by the receiver. Preferably the modulation of the OFDM carriers is arranged so as to produce a real baseband representation of the OFDM signal.
   














 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History
Drawing from US Patent 5488632
Transmission and reception in a hostile interference environment - US Patent 5488632 Drawing
Transmission and reception in a hostile interference environment
Inventor     Mason; Arthur G. (Andover, GB2); Gledhill; Jeffrey J. (Chandlers Ford, GB2)
Owner/Assignee     National Transcommunications Limited (Winchester, GB2)
Patent assignment
All assignments
Publication Date     January 30, 1996
Application Number     07/940,874
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     October 29, 1992
US Classification     375/260 370/208 375/281 375/308 375/348
Int'l Classification     H04K 001/10 H04L 027/28
Examiner     Chin; Stephen
Assistant Examiner     Vo; Don
Attorney/Law Firm     Watson, Cole, Grindle & Watson
Address
Parent Case    
Priority Data     Mar 30, 1990[GB]9007141 Sep 14, 1990[GB]9020169 Sep 14, 1990[GB]9020170
USPTO Field of Search     375/77 375/75 375/80 375/99 375/101 375/102 375/37 375/38 375/27 375/58 375/60 375/104 370/21 370/69.1 370/70 370/19 370/20 348/398 348/607 348/608
Patent Tags     transmission reception hostile interference environment
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
5063574
Moose

Nov,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
5053860
Tsinberg
348/437.1
Oct,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
4928288
D'Aria
375/287
May,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4884139
Pommier
348/21
Nov,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4881241
Pommier
375/260
Nov,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


We claim:

1. Apparatus for receiving an orthogonal frequency division multiplex (OFDM) signal transmitted at low power in a frequency band subject to interference from other transmissions, said OFDM signal comprising a plurality of OFDM carriers modulated by a block of samples, comprising:

means for demodulating the received OFDM carriers so as to produce a block of values representing the block of samples modulating said OFDM carriers;

means for decoding information contained in said sample values, the decoding means excluding from the decoding process sample values demodulated from OFDM carriers at frequencies likely to experience interference from said other transmissions; and

means for outputting said decoded information.

2. Apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the decoding means excludes from the decoding sample values demodulated from OFDM carriers at one or more frequencies likely to experience co-channel interference from one or more respective carriers at a first frequency or group of frequencies likely to experience co-channel interference from the carrier of one of said other transmissions.

3. Apparatus according to claim 2, wherein said other transmissions comprise a television signal and said one or more carriers at one of said other transmissions comprise a vision carrier of the television signal.

4. Apparatus according to claim 3, said one or more carriers of one of said other transmissions comprise a second carrier of the television signal.

5. Apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the decoding means excludes from the decoding sample values demodulated from OFDM carriers at one or more frequencies likely to be affected by adjacent channel interference from said other transmissions.

6. Apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the decoding means excludes from the decoding sample values demodulated from OFDM carriers at one or more frequencies likely to be affected by third order intermodulation products attributable to said other transmissions.

7. Apparatus according to claim 1 and further comprising means for demodulating the modulated OFDM carriers from a further carrier signal by a heterodyne process.

8. Apparatus according to claim 7, wherein an intermediate frequency (IF) used in the heterodyne process is selected so as to ensure that an image channel interferer due to the carrier of one of said other transmissions affects OFDM carrier or carriers at a frequency or group of frequencies at one or more OFDM carriers modulated by sample values already being excluded from the decoding by the decoding means.

9. Apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the decoding means translates at least one demodulated sample value to a location within the block of a demodulated sample values which corresponds to demodulated sample excluded from the decoding.

10. Apparatus according to claim 3, further comprising means for demodulating the modulated OFDM carriers from a further carrier signal by a heterodyne process, an intermediate frequency (IF) used in the heterodyne process being selected so as to insure that an image channel interferer due to a further carrier of one of said other transmissions affects OFDM carriers at said one or more frequencies likely to experience co-channel interference from the vision carrier of the television signal.

11. Apparatus according to claim 4, further comprising means for demodulating the modulated ODFM carriers from a further carrier signal by a heterodyne process, an intermediate frequency (IF) used in the heterodyne process being selected so as to ensure that an image channel interferer due to a further carrier of one of said other transmissions affects OFDM carriers at said one or more frequencies likely to experience co-channel interference from the sound carrier of the television signal.

12. Apparatus according to claim 3, wherein said one or more carriers of one of said other transmissions comprises a vision carrier and a sound carrier of the television signal and further including means for demodulating the modulated OFDM signal from a further carrier signal by a heterodyne process, as intermediate frequency used in the heterodyne process being selected so as to ensure that image channel inteferers due to further carriers of one of said other transmissions affect OFDM carriers at one or more frequencies likely to experience co-channel interference from vision and sound carriers of the television signal.

13. Apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the decoding means comprises means for processing decoded sample values to derive data corresponding to sample values excluded from the decoding.

14. Apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the decoding means comprises means for processing decoded sample values to derive data corresponding to sample values excluded from the decoding.

15. Apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the decoding means comprises means for processing decoded sample values to derive data corresponding to sample values excluded from the decoding.

16. Apparatus according to claim 6, wherein the decoding means comprises means for processing decoded sample values to derive data corresponding to sample values excluded from the decoding.

17. Apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the decoding means translates at least one demodulated sample value to a location within the block of demodulated sample values which corresponds to a demodulated sample excluded from the decoding.

18. Apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the decoding means translates at least one demodulated sample value to a location within the block of demodulated sample values which corresponds to a demodulated sample excluded from the decoding.

19. Apparatus according to claim 6, wherein the decoding means translates at least one demodulated sample value to a location within the block of demodulated sample values which corresponds to a demodulated sample excluded from the decoding.

20. Apparatus for transmitting and receiving information in a frequency band subject to interference from other transmissions, comprising:

a transmitter, comprising:

means for inputting, in the form of blocks of digital data, the information to be transmitted;

means for coding each of the data samples in a block into one of a plurality of allowed values;

means for modulating a set of orthogonal frequency division multiplex (OFDM) carriers with the coded data sample values such that a data sample located in the block at a position corresponding to an OFDM carrier having a frequency identified as likely to experience interference is at least one of omitted and translated and duplicated to another location in the block, whereby another OFDM carrier having a frequency which is not identified as likely to experience is modulated; and

means for transmitting a plurality of OFDM carriers modulated with the block of samples at a power which is low compared with the power of said other transmissions; and

a receiver, comprising:

means for receiving the modulated OFDM carriers;

means for demodulating the received OFDM carriers so as to produce a block of values representing the block of samples modulating said OFDM carriers;

means for decoding information contained in said sample values, the decoding means excluding from the decoding process sample values demodulated from OFDM carriers at frequencies likely to experience interference from said other transmissions; and

means for outputting said decoded information.

21. Apparatus for transmitting and receiving information according to claim 20, wherein said means for coding further includes means for storing and means for writing said coded data samples into said means for storing, and means for reading out said coded data samples of said means for storing to said modulating means, said means for writing including means for addressing coded data sample values so that no coded sample is written into a location in said means for storing that would be transmitted to said modulating means for modulating an OFDM carrier at a frequency identified as likely to experience co-channel interference from the carrier of one of said other transmissions; and

wherein said decoding means excludes from the decoding sample values demodulated from OFDM carriers at one or more frequencies likely to experience co-channel interference from one or more respective carriers at a first frequency or group of frequencies likely to experience co-channel interference from the carrier of one of said other transmissions.

22. Apparatus for transmitting and receiving information according to claim 21, wherein said modulating means modulates the OFDM carriers using an array of real and array of imaginary values, the real array being even symmetrical about its center and the imaginary being skew symmetrical its center, for producing a real baseband signal, and said transmitter further comprising means for mixing the modulated OFDM carriers up to a further frequency for transmission.

23. Apparatus for transmitting information in a frequency band subject to interference from other transmissions, comprising:

a transmitter, comprising:

means for inputting, in the form of blocks of digital data, the information to be transmitted;

means for coding each of the data samples in a block into one of a plurality of allowed values;

means for modulating a set of orthogonal frequency division multiplex (OFDM) carriers with the coded data sample values such that a data sample located in the block at a position corresponding to an OFDM carrier having a frequency identified as likely to experience interference is at least one of omitted and translated and duplicated to another location in the block, whereby another OFDM carrier having a frequency which is not identified as likely to experience is modulated; and

means for transmitting a plurality of OFDM carriers modulated with the block of samples at a power which is low compared with the power of said other transmissions.

24. Apparatus for transmitting information according to claim 23, wherein said means for coding further includes means for storing and means for writing said coded data samples into said means for storing, and means for reading out said coded data samples of said means for storing to said modulating means, said means for writing including means for addressing coded data sample values so that no coded sample is written into a location in said means for storing that would be transmitted to said modulating means for modulating an OFDM carrier at a frequency identified as likely to experience co-channel interference from the carrier of one of said other transmissions.

25. Apparatus for transmitting information according to claim 24, wherein said modulating means modulates the OFDM carriers using an array of real and array of imaginary values, the real array being even symmetrical about its center and the imaginary being skew symmetrical its center, for producing a real baseband signal, and said transmitter further comprising means for mixing the modulated OFDM carriers up to a further frequency for transmission.
 Description Submit all comments and votes
 


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates to the transmission and reception of information and particularly to the transmission and reception of information in digital form at frequencies which are hostile from the point of view of interference from other signals. More particularly, the invention is described in relation to transmitting in or close to the frequency bands of existing ultra-high frequency (UHF) TV signals.

2. Related Art

There exist channels in the UHF TV Spectrum which are not used as part of the frequency planning rules--these are known as the "taboo" channels. To understand these taboo channels it is necessary to have a brief understanding of the way in which the UHF TV band is planned.

The following description is given in the context of the frequency plan adopted in the United Kingdom. It will be understood by a person skilled in the art that, for similar reasons to those discussed below, taboo channels exist in the frequency plans of other countries and that the techniques described below for avoiding interference in a new low power service in a taboo channel may be applied in those countries also (with suitable alterations taking into account the different respective channel bandwidths/channel spacings and sub-carrier frequencies in those countries).

The frequency plan in the United Kingdom consists of 51 main transmitter stations covering some 90% of the population using horizontal polarisation. There then exists 950 small low power relay stations filling the main coverage gaps these use vertical polarisation. Each main transmitter station has a certain coverage area and needs perhaps 20 relay stations for gap filling.

The relay stations in a given coverage area of a single main station have restrictions on the frequencies to which they may be assigned because of the frequency planning taboos. Some of the taboos came about as the result of limited technology when the original UHF plan was designed back in 1961.

In the United Kingdom television channels are assigned 8 MHz segments of the frequency spectrum. If it is desired to broadcast television signals in channel number N, then a first pair of taboo channels (adjacent) arise at channel numbers N.+-.1 because, with receiver technology as it was in 1961, the receiver filters accepting channel N could not reject frequencies used by channels N.+-.1. Two other pairs of taboo channels (local oscillator and image channel) also arise at channels numbers N.+-.5 and N.+-.9 respectively because of the heterodyning process used to demodulate received television signals. If a first receiver were to receive a broadcast signal at one of channels numbers N.+-.5 then during the demodulation process frequencies would be generated at the receiver which would propagate and could interfere with operation of a nearby receiver attempting to demodulate a broadcast signal at channel number N.

There is now interest in exploiting these taboo channels in a way which does no cause interference to the existing television service. The present invention may be utilized for this purpose. More generally, the invention may be applied to enable the transmission of relatively low power signals in frequency bands subject to interference from other transmissions.

Transmissions in the taboo channels may take place without causing interference to existing relay stations in surrounding coverage areas which use the same frequencies providing very low power transmissions are used in the taboo channels. This criterion can be met by using digital modulation which enables transmitter power to be very much reduced without significantly reducing the coverage area. Typically, a digital signal may be transmitted using the methods of the present invention with 30 dB less power for approximately the same coverage as analogue amplitude modulation (AM). However, when sharing the UHF band at such low levels of transmitted power the digital signal is very vulnerable to interference from the much higher power levels of the existing services.

A proposal has been made in European patent application EP-A-0278192 to transmit digital data in the same channel as a conventional television signal. In this proposal the data to be transmitted is used to modulate the carriers of an orthogonal frequency division multiplex OFDM signal. Interference of the television signal into the OFDM signal is reduced by using a frequency offset technique. This technique relies on the fact that the energy in the frequency spectrum of a conventional television signal is centered around multiples of the line frequency 15625 Hz. The carriers of the OFDM signal are conditioned to exist only at frequencies which are offset from the line repetition "harmonic" frequencies of the existing television signal.

There is a finer repetitive structure to the conventional television signal spectrum arising because of the frame repetition rate 25 Hz. EP-A-0278192 also proposes a precision offset technique in which the carriers of the OFDM signal are conditioned to exist only at frequencies which are offset from these frame repetition "harmonic" frequencies.

Offset and precision offset techniques are well-known for use in reducing interference between broadcast television signals. For example, television transmitters broadcasting the same channel are arranged to broadcast their signals at frequencies offset from one another so that the line structure of one spectrum interleaves with that of the other. See EBU technical document 3254. However when contemplating applying an offset technique to an OFDM signal there is a difficulty.

When reference is made to an OFDM signal the image generally brought to mind is of a signal including orthogonal carriers overlapping by 50%, such as that having a power spectrum as illustrated in FIG. 1a. With such a signal the overall data transmission rate for the full channel bandwidth almost reaches the ideal Nyquist rate (see U.S. Pat. No. 3,488,445 in the name of Chang). It may be seen from FIG. 1b that such a signal containing overlapping carriers cannot be interleaved with a conventional television signal.

In order to implement an offset or precision offset technique using an OFDM signal it is proposed in EP-A-0278192 to dispense with overlapping OFDM carriers and instead to use a set of carriers spaced apart from one another and each having a narrower width of the carrier peak. Such an OFDM signal may be used in an offset or precision offset technique as illustrated by FIG. 1c.

The above system has the disadvantage that the overall data transmission rate of the OFDM signal is drastically reduced compared with the theoretical maximum. Furthermore, if a precision offset technique is used then the frequencies of the OFDM carriers must be very precisely locked to the carrier frequency of the interfering television signal.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is based on a different principle from that described above. The present invention seeks to identify particular individual frequencies of the interfering signal which cause the worst interference problems for the proposed new signal and to either prevent this interference by cutting out of the new signal the frequencies that would be affected and/or to reduce the effect of the interference by conditioning a receiver to reject data transmitted at affected frequencies.

Where the interferer is a conventional television signal there are two main components that present continuous high power interfering elements which would affect the proposed transmissions taking place, for example, in the taboo channels, these are the vision carrier and the sound carrier. Although the colour sub-carrier and the digital sound sub-carrier are also present, these are reduced in level by the dispersal effect of their modulating signals. Hence, these sub-carriers have a similar energy level to the vision modulation which has much less peak power than the vision and sound carrier levels and thus does not present such an interference problem. The techniques of the invention may nevertheless be applied to reduce the effects of interference from the colour and digital sound sub-carriers if it is desired.

It follows that a conventional broadcast television signal may be approximated to a spectrum consisting of two continuous wave tones (CW), with the vision carrier at 0 MHz in the baseband and the sound carrier at 6 MHz in the baseband in the United Kingdom. This is shown in FIG. 2.

Transmissions from a given transmission site in the U.K. will resemble four pairs of CW signals as shown in FIG. 3. The pairs of CW signals will always be spaced apart by an integer multiple of 8 MHz in the United Kingdom since successive channel numbers are spaced apart by 8 MHz. Given this property of the interferer it is possible to design the wanted digital channel, which is the interference victim, to resist the interference tones. This will enable the digital signal to be capable of transmission at a level of 30 dB less than the existing TV service. Principal modes of interference are as follows:

(i) co-channel interference

(ii) adjacent channel interference

(iii) image channel interference

(iv) third order intermodulation products.

In order to be able to reject interfering tones it is useful to have a wanted signal spectrum of a type such that pieces can be cut out at frequencies where the interferers fall.

A likely candidate is the usual orthogonal frequency division multiplexed signal spectrum (OFDM) which may be made up of a large number of overlapping modulated carriers as shown in FIG. 1a. Typically 512 overlapping carriers might be transmitted each modulated with a low data rate signal using say quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK). The total bit rate of the signal is the number of carriers times the bit rate per carrier. The resulting OFDM spectrum is rectangular and is an excellent approximation to a noise signal.

If an interfering tone falls on a few OFDM carriers, these carriers may be arranged to be ignored by the receiver, provided the interferer is in a known position in the spectrum. Hence, the receiver cuts out a small portion of the received spectrum by eliminating the information from the affected carriers. Since the carriers suffering interference are not to be processed by the receiver, it is not necessary to transmit them--hence the spectrum may be transmitted with cut out portions if desired. The advantage in providing the cut outs on transmission is that a very small power saving occurs and interference of the OFDM signal into the other existing transmission, e.g. a television signal, is slightly reduced.

Preferably, therefore, no useful information is broadcast on the carriers which will be affected by interference. The relevant data which would normally have been transmitted on the OFDM carriers affected by interference either omitted or is simply translated so as to modulate OFDM carriers at other frequencies.

However, it is also possible to use the OFDM spectrum in this environment by duplicating the "lost" data at one or more other frequency locations in the OFDM signal. Alternatively, if useful information is modulated onto all of the OFDM carrier frequencies without translation or duplication, known methods of data reconstruction may be employed at the receiver to regenerate that data which is lost by the ignoring of specific frequencies from the received data.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Example embodiments of the invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1a illustrates the power spectrum of an Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplex (OFDM) signal;

FIG. 1b compares the spectrum of an OFDM signal with the spectrum of a conventional television signal;

FIG. 1c compares the spectrum of a specially conditioned OFDM signal with the spectrum of a conventional television signal;

FIG. 2 shows the frequency spectrum of a typical television channel;

FIG. 3 shows an approximation to the frequency spectrum broadcast at a typical UK transmitter site;

FIG. 4 is illustrative of co-channel interference;

FIG. 5 is illustrative of image channel interference;

FIG. 6 shows the spectrum of FIG. 3 with an OFDM spectrum added;

FIG. 7 shows a possible final OFDM spectrum according to the present invention;

FIGS. 8a and 8b illustrate how 2-bit digital data samples may be differentially QPSK coded;

FIGS. 9a and 9b show in block diagrammatic form examples of coders according to the present invention;

FIG. 10a illustrates the allowed values of a signal which is QPSK modulated;

FIG. 10b illustrates the allowed values of a signal which is 8 PSK modulated;

FIG. 10c illustrates the allowed values of a signal which is 16 QAM modulated;

FIG. 11 illustrates two possible approaches to the modulation of an OFDM signal onto a carrier;

FIG. 12 is a simplified block diagram showing the transmission side of an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 13 shows a simplified block diagram of a receiver compatible with the transmitter of FIG. 12;

FIG. 14 shows in block diagrammatic form a decoder in one embodiment of a receiver according to the invention; and

FIG. 15 shows in block diagrammatic form a decoder in another embodiment of a receiver according to the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

As mentioned above there are four principal types of interference likely to affect a low power transmission:

i) co-channel interference,

ii) adjacent channel interference,

iii) image channel interference, and

iv) third order intermodulation products.

The description below of methods for handling these types of interference is given in terms of the TV transmission frequency plan in the UK. For TV transmission elsewhere there will be different channel bandwidths and vision and sound carrier frequencies so the values in the calculations will differ. For other types of interfering signal, e.g. radio transmissions, appropriate changes will be needed in the calculations so as to take into account the different carrier frequencies etc.

Also, particular frequencies within a broadcast band are often referred to below as e.g. 6 MHz. In relation to existing television services it will be understood that these numerical values are referenced to the channel carrier frequency, F.sub.o, and so 6 MHz really indicates F.sub.o +6 MHz in the broadcast signal. The actual numerical values will be correct when considering the baseband signal before its modulation up to the desired broadcast channel frequency. In relation to the OFDM signal "6 MHz" indicates the frequency which if a TV signal occupied the channel would be F.sub.o +6 MHz. Since TV signals in the UK are transmitted in vestigial sideband form this frequency will be more than 6 MHz above the lowest frequency present in the OFDM signal.

Straight co-channel interference where a signal according to the invention is transmitted in the same channel, for example, as a conventional TV signal is shown in FIG. 4. If two slots are cut out in the OFDM spectrum, one at the vision carrier position (0 MHz) and one at the sound carrier position (6 MHz), the level of interfering TV signal that may be tolerated may be increased by some 30 dB, compared to the case of not having slots in the OFDM spectrum. Hence, a very large improvement in the level of co-channel interference from a TV signal is gained by slots in the OFDM signal at 0 and 6 MHz.

For other co-channel interferers of the type where the modulation is substantially continuous and causes a much less significant interference problem than does the carrier, slots may be created in the OFDM spectrum at locations corresponding to the or those carrier frequencies.

In relation to adjacent channel interference, often a large signal in the adjacent channel will have spectral components that spill over into the next channel. The OFDM receiver may be arranged to ignore a small number of carriers at the edges of the spectrum in order to eliminate the effect of adjacent channel interference caused by partial blocking. The transmitted OFDM spectrum may be trimmed at the edges in order to omit carriers at the frequencies likely to experience adjacent channel interference and be ignored by the receiver.

Image channel interference arises as explained below.

A superheterodyne receiver tunes to a particular UHF channel by means of a local oscillator (LO) and mixes the signal down to a fixed intermediate frequency (IF). As a consequence of the first mixing stage an image channel is also mixed down into the IF band. The image channel can be thought of as a channel which folds into the wanted channel at I.F. with its spectrum reversed. For conventional television transmissions in the UK the wanted channel is at the UHF frequency which is the LO-IF and the image channel is at the UHF frequency which is LO+IF. Normally an image rejection filter is used at the front end of the receiver which has to be tuned with the LO. However, the rejection offered by a typical, low-cost image filter is insufficient to remove a TV signal interferer which is 30 dB above the OFDM signal. However, if the vision and sound carriers of the TV signal can be made to fall into the OFDM slots already created or envisaged at 0 and 6 HMz then the rejection of the unwanted image will be vastly improved. This can be achieved by suitable choice of IF frequency for the OFDM receiver and will cause the sound carrier image to fold back into the 0 MHz slot and the vision carrier notch to fold back into the 6 MHz notch. This is shown in FIG. 5.

From FIG. 5, the image channel is n channels above the wanted channel and each channel is 8 MHz wide in the UHF band.

Hence F'.sub.v =F.sub.v +8 n (MHz) and F.sub.s =F.sub.v +8 n+6 (MHz)

The condition for the image channel to fold back into the OFDM holes at F.sub.v and F.sub.s is when ##EQU1## the IF frequency can be any value which satisfies the above equation with n an integer. The most convenient value of n=9 gives: ##EQU2##

An IF frequency of 39 MHz is very close to the standard values of 38.9 and 39.5 MHz currently used for television in the UK and a 38.9 MHz SAW IF filter may be used for OFDM without modification.

Although the discussion of how to tackle image channel interference has been cast in terms of selecting a local oscillator frequency for a first mixing stage in the receiver such that the image channel carrier or carriers is/are folded into notches that have been provided in the OFDM spectrum to reduce co-channel interference it will be understood that the important factor is to cause the image channel carrier(s) to affect portions of the OFDM signal that are already affected by other types of interference and that the receiver should already be disregarding. Thus it does not matter if the image channel interferers are folded into locations where no notch as such is actually provided (i.e. useful data has in fact been modulated onto OFDM carriers at the frequencies which the receiver will ignore).

When the new OFDM service is transmitted in the adjacent channels at 30 dB less power than the existing TV service, problems may arise because intermodulation products (IP) of the existing services may fall in the OFDM band at similar levels to the OFDM signal. This section analyses where the intermodulation products will fall in the OFDM spectrum when there are any number of television channels spaced multiples of 8 MHz apart, and gives the number of possible intermodulation products. Intermodulation products might be caused in the receiver by the low noise front end amplifier non-linearities--these cause principally 3rd order intermodulation products. FIG. 6b shows a typical arrangement of four incoming UHF TV channels with the new OFDM signal transmitted from the same mast at a power level 30 db lower than the existing services. The new signal may even be transmitted from the same mast.

If the transfer function of a non-linear device is given by the following equation:

Y=K.sub.1 F(t)+K.sub.2 (F(t)).sup.2 +K.sub.3 (F(t)).sup.3 + . . .

then the third order intermodulation products are generated by the term K.sub.3 (F(t)).sup.3

when F(t)=A sin 2 .pi.F.sub.1 t+B sin 2 .pi.F.sub.2 t+ . . . N sin 2 .pi.F.sub.n t the input signal has n carriers which can be written in a shorthand form as ##EQU3## (i) the first line has IPs of the form x.sup.3 which correspond to out of band IPs given by 3F.sub.x. These can be ignored.

(ii) the second line has IPs of the form x.sup.2 y which give rise to IPs generated from two of the n input frequencies F.sub.x and F.sub.y and IPs at

IP=2F.sub.x -F.sub.y

(iii) the third line has IPs of the form xyz which give rise to IPs generated from three of the n input frequencies F.sub.x, F.sub.y, F.sub.z and generate IPs at:

IP=F.sub.x +F.sub.y -F.sub.z

(iv) the first set of IPs of form (2F.sub.x -F.sub.y) have a multiplying coefficient of 3 whereas the second set of IPs have a multiplying coefficient of 6 which causes the (F.sub.x +F.sub.y -F.sub.z) IPs to be twice as large as the (2F.sub.x -F.sub.y) IPs. Hence for equal magnitude input carries the (F.sub.x +F.sub.y -F.sub.z) IPs are 6 dB greater than the (2F.sub.x +F.sub.y) IPs.

This is an important point to note as IPs caused by three frequencies are more significant than those caused by only two frequencies, they are of course only present when three or more input frequencies are present, i.e. n.gtoreq.3.

The number of IPs generated from n input carriers can be found from the theory of permutations.

Consider a set of n objects (a,b,c,d, . . . n) the number of different ways of choosing r objects from the set of n objects is given by: ##EQU4##

Hence IPs given by two frequencies chosen from a set of n input frequencies generate ##EQU5## intermod products.

Consider now the equation (F.sub.x +F.sub.y -F.sub.z), the number of IPs generated is ##EQU6## because there are 3 frequencies chosen from the n frequency input set. However, since the permutation (F.sub.x +F.sub.y -F.sub.z) and the permutation (F.sub.y +F.sub.x -F.sub.z) generate the same IP frequency the number of IPs actually generated is halved, and is:

______________________________________ ##STR1## IP Frequency Number of IPs Magnitude of each IP ______________________________________ 2F.sub.x - F.sub.y ##STR2## KX.sup.2 Y F.sub.x + F.sub.y - F.sub.z ##STR3## 2KXYZ ______________________________________

TABLE 1 INTERMODULATION PRODUCTS GENERATED FROM N INPUT CARRIERS

Where K is some constant caused by the non-linearity and can be determined from the 3rd Order Intercept point of the device. X is the magnitude of F.sub.x, Y is the magnitude of F.sub.y and Z is the magnitude of F.sub.z. F.sub.x, F.sub.y and F.sub.z are any three frequencies chosen from an n frequency input set.

FIG. 6 shows a typical spectrum of incoming signals to an OFDM receiver front end. Four TV channels consisting of a vision and sound carrier are shown which are spaced integer multiples of 8 MHz apart. Since the vision and sound carrier of a channel are spaced 6 MHz apart it is convenient to show the carrier sitting on a 2 MHz grid, which is the lowest common multiple of 8 MHz and 6 MHz. The OFDM signal is 30 dB down on the vision carrier and for the purpose of the analysis sits in one of the possible channels--in this case an adjacent channel. However, the analysis is not dependent in which channel the OFDM signal sits provided F.sub.o, the nominal position of the vision carrier in that channel, is an integer of 8 MHz away from each vision carrier of the other TV signals.

Intermodulation products will occur at:

(i) IP=2F.sub.x -F.sub.y

(ii) IP=F.sub.x +F.sub.y -F.sub.z

where x, y and z are any of the carriers shown in FIG. 6. Since all carriers are on a 2 MHz spacing and referring all frequencies to the datum frequency F.sub.3 :

F.sub.x =F.sub.o +21 (MHz)

F.sub.y +F.sub.o +2 m (MHz)

F.sub.z =F.sub.o +2 n (MHz)

The 2 is the 2 MHz spacing and l, m and n are integers that give the distance of F.sub.x, F.sub.y and F.sub.z from the datum frequency F.sub.o in 2 HMz steps. The integers may be positive or negative.

Hence IPs are generated at the following frequencies: ##EQU7## since (21-m) is just another integer, say K, then IP=F.sub.o +2K (MHz) Furthermore: ##EQU8## since (l+m-n) is just another integer, say K, then: IP=F.sub.o +2K (MHz)

Hence all IPs generated from any of the input carriers can only fall at integer multiples of 2 MHz. Therefore, the position of the IPs in the OFDM spectrum can only be at the following frequencies:

F.sub.o (MHz) position of vision carrier

F.sub.o +2 (MHz)

F.sub.o +4 (MHz)

F.sub.o +6 (MHz) position of sound carrier

In practice the actual number of IPs falling at these four frequencies will vary depending on the position of the TV channels relative to the OFDM spectrum. However, this analysis shows the upper limit to the position of all the possible 3rd order intermodulation product from any number of incoming TV channels. Hence, from the above theory placing cut-outs in the OFDM spectrum at 0, 2, 4 and 6 MHz will prevent interference from 3rd order IPs.

The OFDM spectrum with information eliminated at the nominal position of the vision carrier 0 MHz, at 2 MHz and 4 MHz and the nominal position of the sound carrier 6 MHz is able to resist a variety of interferers. By means of this strategy, interference from co-channel, image channel and 3rd order intermodulation product may be rejected. The image channel rejection requires a correct choice to be made for the IF frequency. Adjacent channel overlapping interferers may be rejected by removing information at the edges of the OFDM spectrum.

There is an additional advantage to removing information at the low frequency (d.c.) edge of the OFDM baseband spectrum. Having no energy at d.c. allows a.c. coupled amplifiers to be used in the signal processing.

Hence the OFDM spectrum with novel conditioning lends itself to broadcasting in a very hostile interference environment. The resulting OFDM spectrum is shown in FIG. 7.

As shown in FIG. 1a, an orthogonal frequency division multiplex (OFDM) signal consists of a large number of carriers each of which is modulated by a signal whose level varies discretely rather than continuously and thus the power spectrum of each modulated carrier follows a (sin/x).sup.2 curve. The symbol rate of the modulating signals, and the carrier frequencies, are such that the peak of each modulated carrier occurs at a frequency corresponding to nulls for all of the other modulated carriers. The carrier spacing is equal to the reciprocal of the symbol rate of each modulating signal (assuming that all of the modulating signals have the same symbol rate).

The overall spectrum of the OFDM signal is very close to rectangular when a large number of carriers are contained in the OFDM signal.

During a time period, T, the OFDM signal may be represented by a block of N time domain samples. The value of the kth sample is, as follows: ##EQU9##

The N values X(n) represent the respective values, during period T, of the discretely-varying signals which modulate the OFDM carriers e.sup.2jnk/N.

It may be seen from the above equation that the OFDM signal corresponds to the inverse Discrete Fourier Transform of a set of data samples, X(n) Thus, a stream of data may be converted into an OFDM signal by splitting the data stream up into blocks of N samples X(n) and subjecting each block of data samples to an inverse Discrete Fourier Transform.

The succession of data samples, X(n.sub.i), which appear at a particular sample position n.sub.i over time constitute a discretely-varying signal which modulates a carrier at a frequency, f.sub.n.

According to the present invention it is preferred to have only a restricted set of values which the samples X(n) may take, the set of values representing a set of phase states and amplitudes to be imparted to carriers, fn. In particularly preferred embodiments of the invention the set values to which the samples X(n) are restricted comprises values +1+j, +1-j, -1+j and -1-j. This set of values corresponds to four allowable equally spaced phase states for the modulated carriers f.sub.n, and the same amplitude. Thus, the modulation of each carrier, f.sub.n, in these embodiments amounts to quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK). QPSK has the advantage of simplicity and good performance. Further advantages may be gained by differentially coding the data (this avoids the need for carrier references). An OFDM signal produced in this way will also tolerate non-phase-equalised channels much better than would conventional signals.

If the data to be QPSK modulated on to the OFDM carriers consists of data samples, each data sample taking one of the four possible levels, then it is relatively simple to code the input data into one of the four allowed modulating values .+-.1.+-.j. However, where this is not the case (for example, where the data consists of 3 (or more) bit data samples) then it is necessary to use an indirect process to code the input data into the four allowed sample values .+-.1.+-.j. One way of doing this is to first convert the input data into a binary