WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Stacked fluid-separation membrane disk module assemblies    
United States Patent5500122   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/5500122.html
Inventor(s)Schwartz; A. William (Upland, CA)
AbstractA module for separating at least one component from a flowing mixture containing the same, includes a pair of end plates between which a plurality of stacked separation disks are positioned. The separation disks separate at least one component from the flowing mixture and defines a central passageway therethrough. A tensionable conduit is disposed in the fluid passageway to define a pathway for the separated component through at least one of said end plates and cause the end plates to exert a compressive force to the stacked separation disks in response to the conduit being tensioned. In preferred embodiments, the tensionable conduit includes a single or double helix spring which is machined along a major axial extent of its length. An adjustment nut may thus be threadably coupled to at least one (nonmachined) end portion of the conduit so as to adjustably tension the conduit and translate such tension into compressive force exerted to the stack of membranes by the end plates.
   














 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History
Drawing from US Patent 5500122
Stacked fluid-separation membrane disk module assemblies - US Patent 5500122 Drawing
Stacked fluid-separation membrane disk module assemblies
Inventor     Schwartz; A. William (Upland, CA)
Owner/Assignee     UOP (Des Plaines, IL)
Patent assignment
All assignments
Publication Date     March 19, 1996
Application Number     08/241,370
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     May 11, 1994
US Classification     210/321.75 96/7 96/11 210/232 210/321.84 210/346 210/350 210/352
Int'l Classification     B01D 063/00
Examiner     Fortuna; Ana M.
Assistant Examiner    
Attorney/Law Firm     McBride; Thomas K. Tolomei; John G. ,
Address
Parent Case    
Priority Data    
USPTO Field of Search     210/321.75 210/381.84 210/350 210/346 210/347 210/352 210/456 210/433.1 210/445 210/454 210/232 96/7 96/11
Patent Tags     stacked fluid-separation membrane disk module assemblies
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
2592527



[0 after 0 votes]
3570280



[0 after 0 votes]
3528554



[0 after 0 votes]
3439119



[0 after 0 votes]
3390546



[0 after 0 votes]
3322279



[0 after 0 votes]
3259248



[0 after 0 votes]
3207311



[0 after 0 votes]
3156106



[0 after 0 votes]
3152988



[0 after 0 votes]
3083834



[0 after 0 votes]
2902164



[0 after 0 votes]
2757803



[0 after 0 votes]
2604994



[0 after 0 votes]
1800625



[0 after 0 votes]
1913886



[0 after 0 votes]
1987316



[0 after 0 votes]
2304618



[0 after 0 votes]
2349469



[0 after 0 votes]
2359475



[0 after 0 votes]
5318704
Cosgrove
210/352
Jun,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5244578
Ohnishi
210/650
Sep,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5130020
Meckstroth
210/264
Jul,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5106506
Schmidt
210/321.84
Apr,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5069789
Mohn

Dec,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
4945956
Bueyuekgueclue
141/67
Aug,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4855048
Tang
210/500.3
Aug,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4801381
Niesen
210/321.84
Jan,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4790700
Schwartzman
409/233
Dec,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4759845
Selesnick
210/316
Jul,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4707258
Drori
210/333.1
Nov,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
4698154
Mohn
210/232
Oct,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
4678578
Nodes
210/445
Jul,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
4613436
Wight
210/232
Sep,1986

[0 after 0 votes]
4601824
Dreyer
210/232
Jul,1986

[0 after 0 votes]
4243536
Prolss
210/321.84
Jan,1981

[0 after 0 votes]
4230646
Ghizzoni
261/35
Oct,1980

[0 after 0 votes]
4203305
Williams
464/60
May,1980

[0 after 0 votes]
4134642
Kapron
385/127
Jan,1979

[0 after 0 votes]
4132649
Croopnick
210/347
Jan,1979

[0 after 0 votes]
4379051
Hiesinger
210/193
Dec,1969

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


What is claimed is:

1. A fluid separation module comprising:

a plurality of membrane disks each having a central first aperture and a pair of second apertures radially spaced from said central first aperture, said membrane disks being stacked relative to one another so that said central first apertures thereof are registered to establish a central fluid passageway, and so that said second apertures thereof are registered to establish a respective pair of second fluid passageways;

sealing layers interposed between adjacent stacked membrane disks to fluid isolate said first fluid passageway from said pair of second fluid passageways and to seal a peripheral edge region of said membrane disks surrounding said pair of second fluid passageways; and

a permeate tube positioned coaxially with said central fluid passageway to provide a conduit for fluid in said central fluid passageway, said tube is provided with integral compression means to maintain a compressive force on said stacked membrane disks, whereby repeated pressurization and depressurization of said module may occur by virtue of said compressive force, maintaining said sealing layers in sealing contact with said adjacent membrane disks.

2. A module as in claim 1, wherein said integral compression means in said permeate tube includes at least one unitary helical spring.

3. A module as in claim 1, wherein said integral compression means in said permeate tube includes a unitary bihelical spring.

4. A module as in claim 1, wherein said module includes a pair of opposed end plates between which said membrane disks are stacked, and wherein said permeate tube exerts said compressive force to said pair of end plates.

5. A module as in claim 4, wherein said permeate tube includes end portions each coupled to a respective said end plates to allow for relative axial displacements, and a helical spring formed in said permeate tube and extending axially between said end portions.

6. A module as in claim 5, further comprising at least one adjustment nut threadably coupled to one of said ends of said permeate tube such that turning movements to said adjustment nut places said helical spring of said permeate tube trader tension, and wherein said adjustment nut translates said tension of said helical spring into said compressive force exerted by said end plates.

7. A module as in claim 6, wherein both ends of said permeate tube include a respective adjustment nut.

8. A fluid-separation system comprising a vessel, and at least one module according to claim 1.
 Description Submit all comments and votes
 


CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is related to copending and commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 08/241,371 and 08/240,509, each filed on even date herewith, the entire content of each such application being incorporated hereinto expressly by reference.

FIELD OF INVENTION

This invention relates to improvements to membrane modules usefully employed in the field of fluid separations whereby fluid components are separated from a fluid mixture. In preferred forms, the present invention is embodied in a stacked membrane disk module which includes the means by which fluid leakage is prevented by maintaining compressive force on the membrane disks in the stack to accommodate movements of mechanical components during repeated pressurization/depressurization cycles.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A variety of commercial processes rely on the use of fluid separation techniques in order to separate one or more desirable fluid components from a mixture. For example, in the production of natural gas, it is typically necessary for the producer to strip carbon dioxide from natural gas in order to meet government regulatory requirements. It is also typically desirable in many chemical processes for hydrogen to be removed and recovered from gaseous process streams.

The use of membranes for fluid separations has achieved increased popularity over other known separation techniques. However, one major disadvantage of membranes for use in fluid separations is that the membranes must be supported in a "package" (sometimes referred to as a "module") which provides the requisite flow path to achieve the desired fluid separation. The membrane package must also exhibit sufficient structural integrity to withstand the pressures needed to effect separation in a given process. These physical demands of membrane packages become especially acute when the membrane package is used in high pressure separation processes (i.e., fluid separation processes having operating pressures of greater than about 500-1000 psi).

Recently, a stacked membrane disk assembly for fluid separations has been proposed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,613,436 issued to William W. Wight et al on Sep. 23, 1986 (hereinafter more simply referenced as "the Wight et al '436 Patent", the entire content of which is expressly incorporated hereinto by reference). According to the Wight et al '436 Patent, a compact stack of alternating layers of membrane disks with layers of feed fluid spacers is suggested. Each such layer is provided with a pair of notches formed in the perimetrical edge and a central aperture. The respective notches and apertures of each layer are registered when stacked such that the registered notches collectively form respective feed and residue channels, while the registered apertures collectively form a permeate channel.

Sealing beads (e.g., bead 40 shown in FIG. 3 and bead 57 shown in FIG. 4 of the Wight et al '436 Patent) extend around the perimetrical edge of the feed fluid spacers from one notch to the other. The sealing beads are thus discontinuous around the edge of the feed fluid spacers in the area of the notches (see, column 9, lines 18-21 of the Wight et al '436 Patent). In use, these discontinuous edge beads cooperate in conjunction with edge seals associated with the distribution plates and feed fluid spacers of the assembly disclosed in the Wight et al '436 Patent (i.e., edge seals 104 and 180 shown in FIGS. 9 and 10, respectively). These edge seals thereby serve as a pressure seal against the interior surface of the pressure vessel in which the assembly is positioned so that the feed and residue channels are collectively defined by the registered notches and a corresponding adjacent interior surface of the pressure vessel wall. In addition, the discontinuous sealing beads employed in the assembly disclosed in the Wight et al '436 Patent serve to fluid-isolate interior regions of the pressure vessel on opposing sides of the stacked membrane disk assembly so as to establish a pressure gradient (e.g., between 1-5 psi) between the feed inlet and residue discharge ports.

While the stacked membrane disk assembly disclosed in the Wight et al '436 Patent represented a significant advance in the art of fluid separations, there exist several practical disadvantages associated with the assembly's required notches and discontinuous sealing beads. As noted above, since the sealing beads are discontinuous, in order to effectively fluid-isolate the feed and residue channels from one another, the beads must make effective sealing contact with the interior surface of the pressure vessel wall. As a consequence, the interior surface of the pressure vessel wall must be machined to very high tolerances to prevent even the slightest gap from existing between the discontinuous sealing beads and the interior surface vessel wall. For example, at high operating pressures of greater than between about 500-1000 psi, a very small gap between the discontinuous sealing beads and the interior surface vessel wall could cause failure of the membrane assembly (i.e., prevent the membrane assembly from performing its intended fluid separation functions).

Improvements to the stacked membrane disk assembly disclosed in the Wight et al '436 Patent are proposed in the above-referenced copending and commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/241,371. In this regard, a principal improvement disclosed in that copending Patent Application is embodied in a self-contained stacked membrane assembly. That is, the membrane module assembly disclosed in that copending Patent Application is itself pressure-isolated and thus does not require edge seals to be formed with the interior surface of the pressure vessel wall. As a result, the only requirement on the internal dimensions of the pressure vessel is that sufficient space be provided to house the membrane assembly. In other words, the longitudinal and/or latitudinal size of the pressure vessel wall can be virtually any dimension since the perimetrical edge of the membrane assembly does not need to be sealed against the interior pressure vessel wall in order to perform its intended fluid-separation functions.

In use, membrane module assemblies are subjected to repeated pressurization and depressurization cycles due to periodic equipment maintenance and day-to-day processing needs requiring equipment shut-down. When stacked membrane disk modules of the type disclosed in the copending Patent Application cited above are pressurized, stone of the structural components may undergo irreversible dimensional deformation. For example, the membrane and/or permeate carrier sheets in the membrane disks may be dimensionally "thinned" when subjected to relatively high pressures (sometimes on the order of greater than 1000 psi) of a given fluid separation process. At the same time, however, the seals employed will typically be sufficiently elastic and/or compressible so that they will maintain a fluid and pressure tight seal with the membrane disks when pressurized.

However, the seals in the module may not be capable of